Search

Purpose: Standard dosing and intermittent bolus application (IB) are important risk factors for pharmacokinetic (PK) target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactams in critically ill patients, particularly in those with sepsis and septic shock. We assessed the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-guided (TDM), continuous infusion (CI) and individual dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP) on PK-target attainment in critically ill patients., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of a database including 484 patients [933 serum concentrations (SC)] with severe infections, sepsis and septic shock who received TDM-guided CI of PIP in the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic teaching hospital. The PK-target was defined as a PIP SC between 33 and 64 mg/L [fT > 2-4 times the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA)]., Results: PK-target attainment with standard dosing (initial dose) was observed in 166 patients (34.3%), whereas only 49 patients (10.1%) demonstrated target non-attainment. The minimum PK-target of ≥ 33 mg/L was overall realized in 89.9% (n = 435/484) of patients after the first PIP dose including 146 patients (30.2%) with potentially harmful SCs ≥ 100 mg/L. Subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustments significantly enhanced PK-target attainment to 280 patients (62.4%) and significantly reduced the fraction of potentially overdosed (≥ 100 mg/L) patients to 4.5% (n = 20/449). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) resulted in a relevant reduction of PIP clearance (CL PIP ): no RRT CL PIP 6.8/6.3 L/h (median/IQR) [SCs n = 752, patients n = 405], continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) CL PIP 4.3/2.6 L/h [SCs n = 160, n = 71 patients], intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) CL PIP 2.6/2.3 L/h [SCs n = 21, n = 8 patients]). A body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m 2 significantly increased CL PIP 9.6/7.7 L/h [SC n = 43, n = 18 patients] in these patients. Age was significantly associated with supratherapeutic PIP concentrations (p < 0.0005), whereas high CrCL led to non-target attainment (p < 0.0005). Patients with target attainment (33-64 mg/L) within the first 24 h exhibited the lowest hospital mortality rates (13.9% [n = 23/166], p < 0.005). Those with target non-attainment demonstrated higher mortality rates (≤ 32 mg/L; 20.8% [n = 10/49] ≥ 64 mg/L; 29.4% [n = 79/269])., Conclusion: TDM-guided CI of PIP is safe in critically ill patients and improves PK-target attainment. Exposure to defined PK-targets impacts patient mortality while lower and higher than intended SCs may influence the outcome of critically ill patients. Renal function and renal replacement therapy are main determinants of PK-target attainment. These results are only valid for CI of PIP and not for prolonged or intermittent bolus administration of PIP.

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria challenges a clinician's ability to fight life-threatening infections. Administering beta-lactams via extended infusion may improve patient outcomes. This article discusses the underlying principles of this therapeutic approach and when it may be appropriate.

Introduction: Sequential antibiotic therapy (SAT) is safe and economical. However, the unnecessary use of intravenous (IV) administration usually occurs. The objective of this work was to get to know the effectiveness of an intervention to implement the SAT in a teaching hospital in Brazil., Methods: This was a prospective and interventional study, historically controlled, and was conducted in the Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, a high complexity teaching hospital having 503 beds. In each of the periods, from 04/04/05 to 07/20/05 (pre-intervention) and from 09/24/07 to 12/20/07 (intervention), 117 patients were evaluated. After the pre-intervention period, guidelines were developed which were implemented during the intervention period along with educational measures and a reminder system added to the patients' prescription., Results: In the pre-intervention and intervention periods, the IV antibiotics were used as treatment for a average time of 14.8 and 11.8 days, respectively. Ceftriaxone was the antibiotic most prescribed in both periods (23.4% and 21.6% respectively). Starting from the first prescription of antibiotics, the average length of hospitalization time was 21.8 and 17.5 days, respectively. The SAT occurred only in 4 and 5 courses of treatment, respectively, and 12.8% and 18.8% of the patients died in the respective periods., Conclusions: Under the presented conditions, the evaluated intervention strategy is ineffective in promoting the exchange of the antibiotic administration from IV to oral treatment (SAT).

Background: We assessed the effects of preventive practices on sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and reproductive tract infections (RTIs) among female sex workers (FSWs) in Lanzhou, China., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 350 FSWs from November 2008 to January 2009. Demographic information and behavioural factors associated with STIs were collected from all the participants. Blood samples and cervical swabs were obtained, and genital and cervical examinations were done at the collection site. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationships between preventive measures and the incidences of STIs and RTIs., Results: The utilization rates of vaginal douching (VD), regular intravenous infusion (RII), and prophylactic oral antibiotics (POA) among FSWs were 72.9%, 35.7%, and 36.3%, respectively. The preventive measures had no impact on diagnosed STIs. On the contrary, the use of VD + POA could increase the risk of vaginal infection by 2-fold (odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% credible interval (95% CI) 1.3-6.7). Moreover, the risk for cervical infection increased with the use of POA alone (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.1-15.4), VD + POA (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-10.3), and VD + RII (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.7)., Conclusions: VD, RII, and POA, which were used widely by FSWs to prevent STIs after sex with their clients, were assumed to prevent STIs. Instead, our study indicates that they could increase the risk of vaginal or cervical infections. Therefore, FSWs should be informed of proper preventive strategies to reduce the incidence.

Objective: The increase of bacterial resistance and of fluoroquinolones consumption led to set up an action plan in order to improve the use of fluoroquinolones., Methods: Two audits "on a given day" in February 2005 (before action) and January 2007 (after action) allowed evaluating the effects of several interventions: restitution of the results from the first audit and antibiotics counselling by an infectious diseases expert, conception and diffusion of local recommendations and follow-up of antibiotic consumption., Results: The prevalence of the fluoroquinolones' prescriptions was 49/503 hospitalized patients in 2005 (1st audit) and 30/482 in 2007 (2nd audit). Global conformity to the recommendations was 47% in 2005 and 40% in 2007. The number of inappropriate indications remained stable between 2005 (12, 25%) and 2007 (10, 33%) with a reduction in the use of fluoroquinolones for empirical treatments: 74% in 2005 and 50% in 2007. The use of the intravenous route decreased from 45% in 2005 to 27% in 2007. Consumption of antibiotics and fluoroquinolones decreased by 7% and 30% between 2005 and 2007 respectively., Conclusion: The interventions allowed to decrease the use of fluoroquinolones in empirical treatments and to limit the use of the intravenous route. The impact on the fluoroquinolones and antibiotics consumption has been demonstrated. However, the proportion of inappropriate indications remained unchanged. The impact of the fluoroquinolones consumption decrease on the bacterial resistance will be the next step of our action., (Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Infectious diseases are currently one of the major health problems worldwide. As a consequence, both nosocomial and community-acquired infections are responsible for a significant increase in workload and health costs for hospitals, particularly in Intensive Care Units (ICU), Internal Medicine and Surgery. The use of intravenous antimicrobial agents is common in hospitalized patients. In order to determine the use of antimicrobial agents and the most frequent procedures used for their administration in Spanish hospitals, a national multicenter survey was undertaken among ICU, Internal Medicine and Surgery health staff from 63 hospitals, in which data were collected on central and peripheral catheter manipulation and intravenous administration. Results showed that, in Spain, both catheter manipulation (insertion, maintenance and removal) and administration of antimicrobial agents are performed by the nursing staff following established protocols, particularly for central catheters. Moreover, the ICUs had the highest rates of catheter-bearing patients, as well as patients undergoing antimicrobial treatment, sometimes in combination. The use of intravenous antimicrobial agents in Spanish hospitals results in an increased workload for the nursing staff and higher health costs, not to mention the risk involved with the use of vascular catheters.

With the increasing frequency of antibiotic-resistant gram-positive infections in the United States, many patients are being treated outside the hospital setting. The majority of studies on the cost of outpatient antimicrobial therapy involve retrospective medical record review or prospective data collection. These methods tend to be expensive and time consuming, and often fail to produce a sufficiently large sample size. Analysis of insurance claims data offers a convenient approach for studying the costs associated with outpatient therapy for gram-positive infections. To demonstrate this approach, a study of the cost of intravenous vancomycin home care therapy was conducted using claims data from a large insurance company.

We evaluated antimicrobial use in our hospital by department, including indications for use, source of infections, use of the microbiology laboratory, and appropriateness of prescribing, in a prospective, comparative, non-interventional study of all patients receiving antimicrobial agents. We excluded departments where antimicrobial use was negligible. The other 19 departments were followed for 3 (n=4) or 4 (n=15) months, including 2 consecutive months in the spring-summer and either 1 or 2 in the autumn-winter. Antimicrobial therapy was followed from initiation, through possible adaptations, and possible change from intravenous to oral therapy, until discontinuation of treatment. Overall, 6376 antibiotics were given to 2306 patients. Of the surveyed hospitalized patients, 62%+/-22% received antibiotics, with a range of 4-100% per department. Antibiotics were prescribed for infections acquired in the community (3037 instances, 47%), in the hospital (2182, 34%), in a nursing home (575, 9%), and for prophylaxis continued post-operatively (582, 9%). The most common indications for antimicrobial use were: respiratory tract infection (1729, 27%), urinary tract infection (955, 15%), sepsis (701, 11%), intra-abdominal infections (663, 10%), prophylaxis 582 (9%), soft-tissue infection (572, 9%), and surgical site infection (319, 5%). Univariate indicators for appropriateness of treatment were: age, department, site of infection, source of infection, antimicrobial drug and serum creatinine (all p<0.001). Forty-nine antimicrobials were prescribed in 279 combinations, 58% as single agent and 42% as drug combinations. Half of all antimicrobial use consisted of four agents: cefuroxime (19.1%), metronidazole (11.3%), gentamicin (10.6%) and ampicillin (10.2%), which together accounted for 20% of expenditure on antibiotics. Although use of as many as 53% of antimicrobials (26/49) surveyed was restricted, use in this category accounted for only 29% of all antimicrobial courses. Of 6376 antibiotic courses, 4101 (64%) were given intravenously and 2275 (36%) orally. Appropriateness of use of restricted drugs was lower (70%) than of unrestricted ones (84%, p<0.001). Of 24571 defined daily doses (DDD) given orally, 4587 (19%) were restricted, compared to 7264 (34%) of 21602 DDDs given intravenously (p<0.001). Antibiotic treatment in our hospital appears to be substantial and increasing, justifying efforts to improve appropriateness of therapy and improve clinical and financial results.

The intravenous push method for drug administration is not a new idea. In an era of quality, good patient outcomes, and cost efficiency it is important to look at economical and safe methods of drug delivery. This article reviews different methods of drug delivery and compares outcomes. The focus of the study was a comparison of minibag versus i.v. push drug delivery for anti-infective self-administration in the home setting. Case reports totalling 1116 from 50 sites were analyzed. The most frequently used drugs were ceftriaxone, cefazolin, and ceftazidime. Rates for all complications were 1.89/1000 catheter days for i.v. push and 1.69/1000 days for minibag delivery method. The phlebitis rate was 0.6/1000 catheter days for i.v. push and 0.79/1000 catheter days for minibag delivery method. Client satisfaction rates were comparable for all types of drug-delivery methods.

The NHS Executive is keen to promote "hospital at home" services in Britain, as part of its philosophy of keeping more care in the community and also to relieve the increasing demand for hospital beds. One such service is the provision of intravenous antimicrobial therapy in the community. Yet, compared with the United States, where home or outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy programmes are well developed, experience in Britain and Europe is limited, reflecting a difference in cultural attitudes and healthcare structures between the two continents. Only a few units in Britain currently run home intravenous antimicrobial therapy programmes, and several issues need to be addressed if more treatment is to be provided outside hospital. These include an assessment of the need for community intravenous antibiotic treatment and which patient groups many benefit. The main motive for community intravenous treatment should be better patient care and not simply a reduction in healthcare costs. At present the pace of change is being set by a few clinical enthusiasts and by commercial organisations, whereas the NHS deserves a more organised strategy for purchasing treatment with intravenous antibiotics in the community.

Several techniques can be applied to streamline or optimize antimicrobial therapy in the hospitalized patient. As soon as there is a documented clinical response to intravenous therapy, the antibiotic can be switched to the oral route of administration. This antimicrobial streamlining technique is called switch therapy. This article presents the development of the switch therapy concept, the good clinical outcome obtained with switch therapy in patients with community and nosocomial pneumonia, as well as the cost-savings to our institution after the implementation of this program.

Careful patient selection is vital to the success of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. As more experience has been gained, criteria for acceptance have expanded. Up to 50% of patients now originate from physicians' offices and other nonhospital settings. Currently, medical stability, insurance coverage, and availability of experienced personnel are the major selection criteria.