Search

Objective: To compare virological outcome and genotypic resistance profiles in HIV-1-infected patients starting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens., Methods: NNRTI-naive patients were included who started treatment with nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) with genotypic resistance test results available at time of initiation (baseline). Virological failure was defined as two consecutive values > 500 copies/ml after starting the regimen. Cox models were used to investigate time to virological failure (the first of two values)., Results: A total of 759 patients were included (13% antiretroviral-naive): 389 initiated NVP and 370 initiated EFV. Baseline IAS-USA NNRTI resistance mutations were detected in 3%. Using the Rega algorithm (version 7.1) to interpret resistance, 460 (64%) patients had resistance (full or intermediate) to at least one drug they were starting (69% NVP, 60% EFV, P = 0.011); 287 (74%) NVP and 168 (45%) EFV patients experienced virological failure after treatment initiation, P < 0.001. After adjustment for previous antiretroviral use, previous AIDS, year started NNRTI, CD4 cell count (baseline, nadir), viral load (baseline, maximum), and baseline drug resistance (measured by Rega), the relative hazards (EFV versus NVP) of virological failure was 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.65, P < 0.001. At time of virological failure, comparable levels of NNRTI resistance were detected. The K103N mutation emerged more in patients failing EFV and Y181C in patients failing NVP., Conclusions: NVP may be associated with an inferior virological outcome compared to EFV in NNRTI-naive patients with extensive resistance to other drug classes. The profile of NNRTI resistance mutations when virologically failing an NNRTI-containing regimen appears to depend on the NNRTI the patients fail.

Escalating drug resistance in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients has made management increasingly difficult. In clinical trials, tipranavir (TPV) has produced potent and durable responses in such patients, although experience in clinical cohorts is limited. A retrospective clinical case review was undertaken of triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients receiving optimized boosted TPV-containing regimens and T20 with up to 108 weeks follow-up. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) resistance profiles were characterized using International Aids Society (IAS)-USA scoring and 'TPV resistance score' (TPV-RS) at baseline and failure. Five of 12 patients had undetectable virus (<50 copies/mL) after median 84 weeks (range 60-108), and 1/12 < had 700 copies/mL after 40 weeks. Six of 12 patients failed after 36 (range 12-48) weeks and were more likely to have > or = 3 TPV-RS mutations than non-failures (P = 0.06). Presence of a major IAS-USA mutation at baseline was strongly associated with absence of a 1 log viral load drop at 24 weeks (P = 0.02). TPV-containing regimens showed impressive efficacy and tolerability in this heavily experienced cohort.

Background: Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) may vary in ability to suppress viral load and increase CD4+ T-cell count in people infected with different HIV-1 subtypes, possibly due to differences in resistance development. Antiretroviral drugs have predominantly been developed in Western Europe/North America on the basis of the most prevalent subtype, B. However, non-B subtypes are increasingly spreading worldwide., Objective: To compare virological and immunological response to cART between patients infected with B and non-B subtypes across Europe., Design: EuroSIDA prospective, observational cohort with 11,928 HIV-1-infected patients., Methods: Response to cART was analysed in patients with subtypes determined pre-cART, via multivariable logistic regression on the first measurements 6-12 months after starting cART. A virological response was defined as a viral load <500 copies/mi and immunological response as a CD4+ T-cell count increase of > or =100 cells/mm(3)., Results: Forty-five percent of patients were antiretroviral naive at initiation of cART. Virological suppression was achieved by 58% of 689 subtype-B-infected patients and 66% of 102 non-B-infected patients (P=0.159). After adjustment for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in odds of achieving virological suppression (non-B compared with B; odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.93, P=0.866). An immunological response was achieved by 43% of 753 B-infected patients and 48% of 114 non-B-infected patients (P=0.334). After adjustment, there was no significant difference in odds of an immunological response (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.73-1.87, P=0.524)., Conclusions: There was no evidence of significant differences in virological or immunological response to cART between patients infected with HIV-1 B and non-B subtypes.

Background: Studies have suggested that HIV-1 may develop thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) by one of two distinct pathways - the TAM1 pathway (including mutations 41L, 210W and 215Y) or the TAM2 pathway (including mutations 67N, 70R and 219E/Q) - under the pressure of a not fully suppressive thymidine-analogue-containing regimen., Methods: Frozen plasma samples stored in the EuroSIDA repository were selected and sent to two central laboratories for genotypic analysis. We considered 733 patients with at least one genotypic test showing > or =1 TAMs (the first of these tests in chronological order was used). TAM1 and TAM2 genotypic profiles were defined in accordance with previous literature. Statistical modelling involved logistic regression and linear regression analysis for censored data., Results: The observed frequencies of patterns classifiable as TAM1 or TAM2 profiles were markedly higher than the probabilities of falling into these classifications by chance alone. The chance of detecting a TAM2 profile increased by 25% per additional year of exposure to zidovudine. We found that mutations 67N and 184V were not associated with a particular TAM profile. In the presence of TAM2 profiles, the adjusted mean difference in the 6-month viral reduction was 0.96 log10 copies/ml (95% confidence interval: 0.20; 1.73) higher in patients who started stavudine-containing regimens instead of zidovudine-containing regimens., Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the suggested TAM clustering is a real phenomenon and that it may be driven by which thymidine analogue the patients has used. In patients with TAM2-resistant viruses, stavudine appears to retain greater viral activity than zidovudine.

Objectives: To investigate the ability of several HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation systems, as well as the number of pre-specified combinations of abacavir-related mutations, to predict virological response to abacavir-containing regimens in antiretroviral therapy-experienced, abacavir-naive patients starting an abacavir-containing regimen in the EuroSIDA cohort., Patients and Methods: A total of 100 HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >500 copies/ml who had a plasma sample available at the time of starting abacavir (baseline) were included. Resistance to abacavir was interpreted by using eight different commonly used systems that consisted of rules-based algorithms or tables of mutations. Correlation between baseline abacavir-resistance mutations and month 6 virological response was performed on this population using a multivariable linear regression model accounting for censored data., Results: The baseline VL was 4.36 log10 RNA copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65-4.99 log10 RNA copies/ml] and the median CD4 cell count was 210 cells/microl (IQR: 67-305 cells/microl). Our patients were pre-exposed to a median of seven antiretrovirals (2-12) before starting abacavir therapy. The median (range) number of abacavir mutations (according to the International AIDS Society-USA) detected at baseline was 3.5 (0-8). Overall, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median month 6 VL decline was 0.86 log10 RNA copies/ml [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.45-1.24]. The VL in those patients (n=31) who intensified treatment by adding only abacavir decreased by a median 0.20 log10 RNA copies/ml (95% CI: -0.18; +0.94). The proportion of patients who harboured viruses fully resistant to abacavir among the eight genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms ranged from 12% [Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS)] to 79% [Stanford HIV RT and PR Sequence Database (HIVdb)]. Some interpretation systems showed statistically significant associations between the predicted resistance status and the virological response while others showed no consistent association. The number of active drugs in the regimen was associated with greater virological suppression (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional sensitive drug=0.51, 95% CI: 0.15-0.88, P=0.006); baseline VL was also weakly associated (additional month 6 VL reduction per log10 higher=0.30, 95% CI: -0.02; +0.62, P=0.06). In contrast, the number of drugs previously received was associated with diminished viral reduction (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional drug=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.28; 0.00, P=0.05)., Conclusions: Our results revealed a high degree of variability among several genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms currently in use for abacavir. Therefore, the interpretation of genotypic resistance for predicting response to regimens containing abacavir remains a major challenge.

New information about the benefits and limitations of testing for resistance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) drugs has emerged. The International AIDS Society-USA convened a panel of physicians and scientists with expertise in antiretroviral drug management, HIV-1 drug resistance, and patient care to provide updated recommendations for HIV-1 resistance testing. Published data and presentations at scientific conferences, as well as strength of the evidence, were considered. Properly used resistance testing can improve virological outcome among HIV-infected individuals. Resistance testing is recommended in cases of acute or recent HIV infection, for certain patients who have been infected as long as 2 years or more prior to initiating therapy, in cases of antiretroviral failure, and during pregnancy. Limitations of resistance testing remain, and more study is needed to refine optimal use and interpretation.

In 1996 the International AIDS Society-USA convened an international panel of experts in HIV drug resistance and clinical management to develop guidelines for the clinical use and limitations of resistance testing. Since then the International AIDS Society-USA Resistance Testing Guidelines Panel has developed and regularly published its recommendations. The latest panel recommendations appear in the July 1 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases. We periodically pose questions to the panel relating to clinical elements of resistance testing that have been collected from HIV practitioners across the nation. We are happy to feature the latest edition in this issue of Topics in HIV Medicine. It is our hope that addressing these issues will help guide your treatment strategy decisions regarding resistance testing.

Background: Subpopulations of HIV with mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs often have reduced replicative capacity, so virus with resistance mutations for all existing and new antiretroviral drugs is likely to be appreciably impaired. Issues of toxicity, quality of life and economics mean that the simultaneous use of all these drugs in combination is unrealistic. We aimed to explore the use of sequential monotherapy regimens using a mathematical model of quasi-species dynamics, to see if these could take advantage of the poor replicative capacity of highly resistant virus., Methods: We assume for each of seven drugs that a single mutation is associated with the ability to replicate (effective reproductive ratio, R > 1) in the presence of that drug as monotherapy. Parameters included were drug efficacy, the cost of resistance mutations and the number of new target cells arising daily., Results: The use of seven drugs in a daily/weekly sequential monotherapy cycle led to substantial viral suppression (in the presence of all resistant viral subpopulations) for a wider range of parameter values than a continuous five-drug regimen. Although on any one day/week there is a viral subpopulation with R > 1 (e.g. that with resistance only to the current drug), this subpopulation does not have time to grow sufficiently during the short period when that drug is being taken., Conclusion: These results provide a rationale for trials of sequential regimens, using as wide a number of drugs with different resistance-associated mutations as possible, as a potential 'resistance-proof' strategy for achieving significant viral load suppression.

Purpose and Methods: To describe the evolution of resistance to zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), abacavir (ABC) and nelfinavir (NFV), 113 previously untreated children in the PENTA 5 trial had resistance assayed at baseline, rebound and/or 24, 48, 72 weeks (VIRCO: phenotyping and genotyping with 'Virtual Phenotype' interpretation)., Results: At baseline, few reverse transcriptase mutations and no primary protease inhibitor mutations were observed. Time to detectable HIV-1 RNA with reduced phenotypic susceptibility to any drug was shortest in the ZDV+3TC arm (overall logrank P=0.02). Through a median follow-up of 55 weeks, at their last assessment 11 (28%), 16 (40%) and 13 (32%) children with detectable HIV-1 RNA and a resistance test available had mutations conferring resistance to none, one, or two or more trial drugs, respectively, according to the virtual phenotype. Reduced phenotypic susceptibility to ABC only occurred in the 3TC+ABC arm and required K65R and/or L74V in addition to M184V. NFV-resistant virus was selected slowly through D30N or L90M pathways, and selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare., Conclusions: Selection of 3TC-resistant virus was most frequent, followed by NFV and/or ABC; selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare. Importantly, although in vitro, ABC selects for M184V as the first mutation, ABC did not select for M184V when combined with ZDV without 3TC. The most sustained HIV-1 RNA response was in the 3TC+ABC arm, but mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to 3TC and/or ABC evolved more frequently if virological failure occurred with 3TC+ABC than with ZDV+ABC.

This study evaluated 1433 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), 409 (28%) of whom had prior nucleoside experience and achieved an HIV load of <400 copies/mL by 24 weeks of therapy. Three hundred seven patients experienced virus rebound during a total of 2773.3 person-years of follow-up. There was a higher rate of virus rebound among the patients with pre-HAART nucleoside experience (relative hazard [RH], 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-3.84; P<.0001) and a decreasing rate of virus rebound with increasing duration of virus suppression (i.e., time since achieving a virus load of <400 HIV RNA copies/mL) among both the nucleoside-experienced and naive patients (P<.0001), but the difference between the groups persisted into the third year of follow-up (P=.0007). Even patients who had experienced <2 months of nucleoside therapy before beginning HAART had an increased risk of virus rebound (RH, 1.95; P=.009). It appears that only a small period of pre-HAART nucleoside therapy is sufficient to confer a disadvantage, in terms of risk of virus rebound, that persists for several years.

In most studies, people who have not responded virologically to a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen have tended to experience poor virologic responses to subsequent regimens. We describe the 2-year viral load, CD4 count, and clinical outcome of a multidrug regimen used in 60 people who had not responded virologically to a PI-containing regimen. At baseline, median CD4 count was 126/mm(3) (nadir 30/mm(3) ) and median viral load was 320,000 copies/mL. A median of five antiretroviral drugs had previously been used, of which a median of two were PIs. Of these patients, 16% had previously used another nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor besides efavirenz. The multidrug regimen (median 5 drugs) started most commonly included efavirenz (100%), at least one PI (92%, usually indinavir/ritonavir), didanosine (78%), and hydroxyurea (74%). At year 2, 5 patients had died and 5 had no measure available. Nine patients developed a new AIDS event and 10 patients were known to have stopped all antiretroviral therapy. Thirty-one patients (52% of the whole group, 72% of those remaining on therapy with viral load value available) had viral load <50 copies/mL. Thus, a substantial proportion of patients who had failed to respond virologically to PI-containing regimens can achieve profound and sustained virologic suppression with a multidrug regimen.

Objective: To use a stochastic model to gain insights into the consequence for resistance development of different drug use patterns., Methods: We consider use of three drugs (A, B and C) where for each drug one and only one viral mutation is associated with ability to replicate (effective reproductive ratio, R > 1) in the presence of that drug as monotherapy. For drug A mutation is a, etc. We define eight populations of short-lived infected cells that live 1 day: Vo with no mutations a, b, c; Va with mutation a only, Vab with mutations a and b, etc. A random number generator was used to determine whether mutations occur in any one round of replication and to sample from a Poisson distribution to determine for each cell the number of cells of the same population created in the next generation, using the R operative at that time. Values of R depended on drug exposure, cost of resistance and availability of target cells., Results: Treatment strategies and the resulting percentage (over 100 runs) developing full "resistance" in 1500 days (Vabc not equal 0) were: (i) ABC 1500 days 0%; (ii) A 300 days, AB 300 days, ABC 900 days 100%; (iii) AB 300 days, ABC 1200 days 33%; (iv) ABC 2/3 1500 days 15%; (v) ABC 1/2 1500 days 100%; (vi) ABC 50 days, no drugs 50 days, for 1500 days 1%, where ABC 2/3 means on-drug for 2 days in every 3, ABC 1/2 represents on-drug for 1 day in every 2, and represents suboptimal adherence., Conclusions: This model helps to develop understanding of key principles concerning development of resistance under different patterns of treatment use.

The relative fitness of HIV-1 viral variants containing a broad range of drug resistance-associated mutations has been little studied in vivo. Understanding the relative fitness associated with viruses containing mutations may aid future therapeutic management. The aim of this study was to investigate the relative fitness of mutant viruses by assessing a cohort of patients who had developed resistance to many drugs and subsequently stopped all therapy. Eleven patients were assessed for drug resistance associated mutations in the protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes before and, at multiple time points, after stopping therapy. Relative fitness was calculated as a function of the rate of disappearance of mutant viruses when therapy was stopped. The least fit viruses were associated with the RT mutation M184I/V (11.6% less fit) and the PR mutations D30N (12.4% less fit) and M46I/L (21% less fit). Mutations at these codons were associated with significant reductions in fitness levels compared to wild-type viruses. Mutations at codons 10, 20, 36, and 63 in the PR gene remained fairly constant when therapy was stopped and may not significantly reduce viral fitness. The rapid re-population of wild-type viruses may allow the recycling of antiretroviral drugs prescribed previously., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Purpose: This study investigated the factors that may affect adherence to antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV infection and compared the use of three self-report tools to determine client adherence., Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study of 260 HIV-infected clients attending nine HIV outpatient centers in England was conducted using researcher-administered instruments. Self-reports of adherence were assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), Reported Adherence to Medication Scale (RAM), and the Patient Adjustment to Medication Scale (PAM)., Results: Univariate analysis of clients' self-reports indicated a number of associations with adherence. Significant associations with less adherent behavior identified by two or more self-report tools were the reported use of recreational drugs, p =.001; living alone, p =.041; feeling depressed, p =.02; being influenced by the media, p =.037; and lack of a close confidant, p =.037. Greater adherence was associated with clients reporting a positive mental attitude to HIV infection, p =.038. Principal component analysis (PCA) of each self-report tool identified two well-recognized constructs: intentional nonadherence and unintentional nonadherence. In addition, a third construct of following instructions was identified from PAM, a scale developed by the authors. Subsequent regression analysis failed to confirm the associations with adherence suggested by the univariate analysis., Conclusion: This study suggests that the design and use of self-report tools to identify client's adherence to complex antiretroviral regimens may need to measure individual constructs of adherence to accurately assess adherence behavior.

We sought to determine whether the intracellular activation of zidovudine (ZDV) varied over time and with previous antiretroviral exposure in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals and to examine whether there is an association between virological responses and intracellular phosphorylation. A total of 23 patients (12 treatment naïve, 11 previously treated with ZDV) who commenced ZDV as part of dual nucleoside therapy were prospectively monitored for 12 months or until withdrawal from the study. No association was observed between virological responses at 2 weeks and 3 months and ZDV phosphorylation. The mean intracellular concentrations of ZDV mono-, di-, and triphosphates did not change significantly over time or with previous ZDV exposure. The rate of formation of total ZDV phosphates was increased in patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/mm(3). Previous reports from in vitro cell culture experiments or cross-sectional cohort studies suggesting alterations of ZDV phosphorylation over time are not confirmed by this longitudinal study.

Objective: To describe the short-term changes in CD4 lymphocyte counts after the interruption of antiretroviral HIV therapy in order to increase the understanding of CD4 lymphocyte dynamics, and so that appropriate monitoring strategies can be designed., Methods: We studied 35 HIV-infected patients with late-stage disease who had therapy interruptions leading to high viral load levels, median greater than 750 000 RNA log10 copies/ml, and in whom two CD4 cell counts (median 28 days apart) were available before beginning a salvage regimen., Results: Overall, there was a substantial decline in CD4 cell counts from a median of 125 to 83 cells/mm3 in the average 28 day period, with median proportionate and absolute losses of 26% and 24 cells/mm3 per month, respectively (P < 0.008). This tended to be greater in individuals studied sooner after interrupting therapy (P = 0.03) and in those with CD4 cell counts above the pre-therapy baseline (P = 0.06). There was a strong negative correlation between the proportionate increase in viral load and the absolute change in CD4 cell count (-0.66, P = 0.0002)., Conclusion: Patients with relatively advanced HIV infection interrupting antiretroviral therapy after failing a protease inhibitor-containing regimen require frequent monitoring because CD4 cell counts appear to fall quite rapidly, at least in the first few weeks after interruption.

Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is now widely used in clinical practice and gives rise to a range of immunological, virological and clinical responses., Objectives: To describe the immunological, virological and clinical response to HAART and to examine the frequency of modification of the HAART regimen among patients from a single treatment centre., Methods: Kaplan-Meier estimation and incidence rates were used to describe responses to HAART (a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside drug in addition to at least two nucleoside analogues) among 421 patients from the Royal Free Hospital in London., Results: The median CD4 cell count at starting HAART was 186 x 10(6) cells/l [interquartile range (IQR) 76-310] and viral load was 5.13 log10 copies/ml (IQR 4.66-5.56). At 6 months after starting HAART, 51.1% of patients were estimated to have experienced a 100 x 10(6) cells/l increase in CD4 cell count; the median time for viral load to fall below 400 copies/ml was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.2-4.4). At 6 months after the first viral load was < 400 copies/ml, 16.4% of patients were estimated to have failed on the basis of a single viral load > 400 copies/ml and 12.4% were estimated to have failed if the more stringent definition of two viral loads above the limit of detection was used. Compared with the pre-HAART era, the incidence of death among patients on HAART was one sixth of that level; new AIDS-defining illnesses was one seventh; and hospital admissions was one fifth. In total, 141 patients (33.5%) stopped at least one of the antiretroviral agents included as part of their HAART regimen; the occurrence of side effects was the most common reason (n = 63; 44.7%)., Conclusion: A good response occurred to an initial HAART regimen. There was a high rate of virological relapse, which varied considerably according to the definition of failure used. Even so, the rates of clinical progression and hospital admissions observed to date were low. Further follow-up of these patients is required to determine their long-term immunological, virological and clinical outcome.

The correlation of detectable HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in plasma and PBMCs in patients extensively treated with all antiretroviral drug classes has not been fully elucidated. The detection of mutations in PBMCs may reveal resistant HIV-1 associated with past therapies. In addition, these measures in PBMCs may have a practical value when plasma virus is at low levels that are difficult to detect with current assays. The reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (P) genes were analyzed for drug resistance, using an in-house method carried out on 36 paired samples of plasma and PBMCs from 12 treatment-experienced patients in order to investigate resistance in the two compartments. When viruses in plasma and PBMCs were analyzed by patient, the mean of the Cohen kappa values was 0.728 (substantial agreement). When viruses were analyzed by codon the mean of the Cohen kappa values was 0.715 (substantial agreement). Baseline samples were concordant at 280 of 288 (97%) codons analyzed. This study shows that a minority of mutations associated with previous therapy can be detected in PBMCs and not in plasma. Overall, mutations in plasma and PBMCs showed a substantial correlation in extensively treated patients, suggesting that either compartment is suitable for the detection of mutations as a virological guide for clinical care.

Objectives: Many haemophilic individuals infected with HIV died before receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Most who remain alive are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), which has implications for their prognosis and choice of ART. The clinical status of a cohort of HIV-positive haemophilic men is reported together with their response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)., Design: Longitudinal cohort study., Setting: A comprehensive care haemophilia centre., Patients: A group of 111 haemophilic men who seroconverted to HIV in the period 1979 to 1985., Results: The cohort has been followed since 1979. By 30 April 1999, 57 of the 111 men had developed AIDS and 65 had died: Kaplan-Meier rates of 57.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.9-67.0) and 65.1% (95% CI 52.7-77.4) by 19.5 years, respectively. AIDS rates have declined since 1997 but death rates have remained high, largely owing to deaths from non-HIV-related causes. Thirty-five patients remain alive and under follow-up at the clinic. The 28 men who had received ART had lower CD4 cell counts than the seven patients who had not received ART, but the two groups were otherwise similar. In total, 21 patients are known to have started HAART while under care at the centre. By 10-12 months after starting HAART, viral loads dropped by 2.06 log10 copies/ml and CD4 cell counts increased by 60 x 10(6) cells/l. In 10 out of 18 patients with viral loads initially > 400 copies/ml, a viral load below this level was attained; four had changed therapy at the time., Conclusions: While the decision to initiate HAART in haemophilic men should be made carefully because of the possible adverse events, our results suggest that a good response rate was achieved in this group of men.

Objective: Assays for drug resistance testing in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are now available and clinical studies suggest that viral drug resistance is correlated with poor virologic response to new therapy. The International AIDS Society-USA sought to update prior recommendations to provide guidance for clinicians regarding indications for HIV-1 resistance testing., Participants: An International AIDS Society-USA 13-member physician panel with expertise in basic science, clinical research, and patient care involving HIV resistance to antiretroviral drugs was reconvened to provide recommendations for the clinical use of drug resistance testing., Evidence and Consensus Process: The full panel met regularly between January and October 1999. Resistance and resistance testing data appearing in the last decade through April 2000 and presentations at national and international research conferences were reviewed. Recommendations and considerations were developed by 100% group consensus, acknowledging that definitive data to support final recommendations are not yet available., Conclusions: Emerging data indicate that despite limitations, resistance testing should be incorporated into patient management in some settings. Resistance testing is recommended to help guide the choice of new regimens after treatment failure and for guiding therapy for pregnant women. It should be considered in treatment-naive patients with established infection, but cannot be firmly recommended in this setting. Testing also should be considered prior to initiating therapy in patients with acute HIV infection, although therapy should not be delayed pending the results. Expert interpretation is recommended given the complexity of results and assay limitations.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of initiating a salvage-therapy regimen on resistant viruses in heavily treated patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Nineteen patients receiving multiple antiretroviral drugs were tested for HIV-1 mutations associated with drug resistance by using an in-house method at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 8 of the salvage-therapy regimen. For the majority of mutations analyzed, the mean number of detectable mutations at baseline was significantly higher than the mean at weeks 2, 4, and 8 of salvage therapy. Introducing new and more potent therapy reduces the number of detectable drug resistance-associated mutations within 8 weeks, and no evidence was found that the new therapy promoted the emergence of novel mutations.

Objectives: To review current knowledge of the biology and clinical implications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) resistance to antiretroviral drugs, describe assays for measuring resistance, and assess their use in clinical practice., Participants: The International AIDS Society-USA assembled a panel of 13 physicians with expertise in basic science, clinical research, and patient care relevant to HIV resistance to antiretroviral drugs., Evidence: We reviewed available data from published reports and presented at national and international research conferences. Basic science research, clinical trial results, and expert opinions were used to form the basis of this report. Data on methods for and characteristics of specific genotypic and phenotypic assays were obtained from manufacturers and service providers., Consensus Process: The panel met regularly between October 1997 and April 1998. Panel subgroups developed and discussed different sections of the report before discussing them with the entire panel. Conclusions and suggested approaches to the use of resistance testing were determined by group consensus., Conclusions: Plasma HIV RNA level and CD4+ cell count are the primary values that should be used to guide the initiation of antiretroviral therapy and subsequent changes in therapy. Possible causes of treatment failure other than development of drug resistance that should be considered are adherence, drug potency, and pharmacokinetic issues. Genotypic and phenotypic testing for HIV resistance to antiretroviral drugs may prove useful for individual patient management. Assays under development need validation, standardization, and a clearer definition of their clinical roles. Possible current roles of resistance testing for choosing an initial regimen or changing antiretroviral therapy, as well as possible implications of the presence or absence of phenotypic resistance and genotypic changes, are discussed.

Replication of HIV introduces errors into the genome which are responsible for conferring a growth advantage over wildtype virus when drugs such as zidovudine (ZDV) exert a selective pressure. The molecular basis for HIV-1 resistance to ZDV has been mapped to codons 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219 of the reverse transcriptase gene both in vitro and in clinical samples of blood. This study has investigated the relationship between the quantitative prevalence of ZDV resistance in multiple organs of the same individual. Proviral HIV-1 load was measured by quantitative-competitive PCR in 90 samples from organs of 11 patients dying with AIDS. Nine of these patients had been prescribed zidovudine. The distribution of wildtype and mutant sequences at the positions 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219 of the reverse transcriptase was assessed using a point mutation assay. The results showed that the highest proviral loads were predominately found in lymph node, spleen and lung and there was a significant association between viral load and resistance to ZDV (P=0.008). Inter-organ distribution of wildtype and mutant sequences at codons 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219 was frequently not uniform and in some patients differed markedly between the lymphoreticular system and other organs. These results demonstrate that treatment of HIV-1 infection with zidovudine does not exert uniform selective pressures in multiple organs. These findings have implications for the interpretation of resistance data and design of treatment strategies for HIV, arguing in particular that alterations in therapeutic regimens should consider the likelihood of different resistance patterns being present in multiple sites within the same individual.

Virological assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 load and drug resistance can broadly be divided into culture-based and molecular biology-based methods. Culture-based methods give a direct measure of infectious virus load and phenotypic drug resistance, whereas molecular biology-based methods are indirect, assaying nucleic acid levels to determine virus load and point mutations associated with drug resistance. We have compared culture-based and non-culture-based methods for patients enrolled in a placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine (the Concorde Trial). Virus loads were assayed by culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or quantitative PCR, and drug resistance was assayed in culture or in a quantitative, PCR-based point mutation assay. The rates of detection of viremia and drug resistance were higher by PCR than by culture for this population of subjects. Comparison of the virus loads by the two measures showed a good correlation for virus loads in PBMCs but a poor correlation for virus loads in plasma. The latter result probably reflected the inaccuracies of culture in assaying plasma with the low infectious virus titers seen in the study population. The concordance of phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance methods was high, with all phenotypically resistant isolates having at least one resistance-associated mutation and with no mutations being found in a drug-sensitive isolate. Genomic resistance scores (weighted sums of levels of resistance mutations) showed good correlations with the levels of phenotypic resistance, and both resistance measures were observed to increase as the duration of exposure to drug increased. Overall, non-culture-based methods were shown to correlate well with culture-based methods and offer a low-cost, high-throughput alternative. However, culture-based methods remain the final arbiters of infectious virus load and phenotypic drug resistance and are unlikely to be superseded entirely.

Background: The Delta trial showed that combination therapy (zidovudine plus didanosine and zidovudine plus zalcitabine) substantially lengthened life and reduced disease progression compared with zidovudine monotherapy. We did a nested virological study in three countries (France, the Netherlands, and the UK) to investigate changes in markers for viral load and antiretroviral-drug resistance during therapy., Methods: 240 zidovudine-naive HIV-1-infected patients were randomly assigned zidovudine only (n = 87), zidovudine plus didanosine (n = 80), or zidovudine plus zalcitabine (n = 73). Viral load in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells and plasma was measured by quantitative culture. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was measured by reverse-transcriptase PCR amplification, and serum p24 antigen by ELISA. Resistance to antiretroviral drugs was measured phenotypically by culture and genotypically by detection and quantification of drug-related point mutations in the pol gene. Analyses were done by intention to treat., Findings: The reduction in viral load was greatest 4-12 weeks after the start of therapy and was most pronounced in the combination-therapy study groups (median reductions of RNA at 4 weeks 1.58, 1.28, and 0.49 log10 copies/mL for zidovudine plus didanosine, zidovudine plus zalcitabine, and zidovudine only, respectively). RNA levels at 8 weeks were predictive of disease progression and death after allowance for baseline values. At 48 weeks, the proportion of participants with phenotypic zidovudine resistance was similar in all three groups: didanosine and zalcitabine resistance were rare; zidovudine genomic resistance correlated with phenotypic resistance (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001) and developed earlier in the combined-therapy groups. However, participants in the zidovudine monotherapy group had higher circulating loads of resistant virus than those in the combined-therapy groups., Interpretation: Combined antiretroviral therapy was more efficient at lowering virus load than monotherapy. Although zidovudine resistance was common in monotherapy and combined-therapy groups, circulating concentrations of resistant virus were substantially lower in the combination groups, which is likely to be a result of the continued antiviral activity of didanosine or zalcitabine.

Atevirdine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In this study we investigated the effect of atevirdine in asymptomatic antiretroviral naive HIV-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts of between 200 and 750 cells per mm3. Patients were randomized to receive 600 mg of atevirdine (n = 15) or a placebo (n = 15) three times a day for 12 weeks. There was no statistically significant effect of atevirdine on viral loads (HIV p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA levels by PCR) or CD4+ cell counts. The data do not support the use of atevirdine as a monotherapy in the treatment of HIV-infected patients.