Search

Background: Infections are common in terminally ill patients (pts), and although antibiotics are frequently prescribed, their benefit for symptom relief is not clear. Antimicrobials at the end of life (EOL) may increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance and Clostrioides difficile infection. Our aim was to determine the frequency of symptom occurrence at the EOL when comparing pts who did or did not receive antibiotics (AB+ or AB-)., Methods: We reviewed electronic medical records of pts admitted to a palliative care unit of a quarternary care hospital between 01/09/2017 and 07/16/2017 and assessed antimicrobial use in the last 14 days of life. Differences in demographics and symptom control between AB+ and AB- pts were analyzed using chi-square analyses; p-values were computed using Mann-Whitney tests., Results: Of a total of 133 pts included, 90 (68%) received antimicrobials (AB+). The indication for antibiotics was documented in only 12% of pts. The AB+ and AB- groups were similar with respect to demographics, including sex, and Charleston Comorbidity Index except for age (p = 0.01) and race (p = 0.03). Documented infections were similar between AB+ and AB- groups, except urinary tract infections. No statistically significant differences were noted in documented symptoms including pain, dyspnea, fever, lethargy, and alteration of mental state or length of stay., Conclusion: Our study did not show differences in frequencies of documented symptoms with use of antimicrobials at EOL. Antimicrobial stewardship programs and further research can help with developing EOL care antimicrobial guidelines supporting patients and providers through shared decision-making.

Background Infections are common in terminally ill patients, and although antibiotics are frequently prescribed, their benefit for symptom relief is not clear. Antimicrobials at the end of life (EOL) increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance and Clostridium difficile infection. Very few studies have described the risks and benefits of antimicrobials in patients at EOL. Here, we describe a retrospective chart review of antimicrobial use at EOL. Methods We reviewed electronic medical records of patients admitted in a palliative care unit of a tertiary care hospital between 2017 and 2018 and assessed antimicrobial use in the last 14 days of life. The analysis excluded neutropenic patients. Differences in demographics and symptom control between patients who did or did not receive antibiotics (AB+ or AB−) were analyzed using chi-square analyses; P-values were computed using Mann–Whitney tests. Results Of a total of 133 patients included, 89 (67%) received antimicrobials (AB+); however, the role of antibiotics was documented in only 12% of patients. The AB− and AB+ groups were similar with respect to demographics, including sex, and Charleston Comorbidity Index except for age (table). Documented infections were similar between AB− and AB+ groups, except urinary tract infections. No statistically significant differences were noted in documented symptoms including pain, dyspnea, fever, lethargy, and alteration of mental state or length of stay (LOS). Conclusion Our study did not show differences in frequencies of documented symptoms with use of antimicrobials at EOL. These results indicate that the risks of antimicrobial use may outweigh potential benefits and their use should be a part of goals of care discussions at EOL. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]