Search

Rationale: An antagonist (MK-7123) of the cytokine receptor CXCR2 reduces neutrophil chemotaxis and thus may alleviate airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)., Objectives: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three dose levels of MK-7123, compared with placebo, in patients with moderate to severe COPD., Methods: This 6-month, double-blind study randomized patients with moderate to severe COPD (already on standard therapy) to daily MK-7123 at 10, 30, or 50 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in post-bronchodilator FEV1., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 616 patients (71% male; mean age, 63 yr; 45% current smokers; baseline FEV1 [SD], 1.43 L [0.45]; mean FEV1 percent predicted, 43.9%) were randomized. Only MK-7123 50 mg led to significant improvement in FEV1 over placebo (mean difference [SE], 67 ml [32]). Reduced sputum neutrophil count was observed among the 122 patients examined; P = 0.003 (3 mo) and P = 0.092 (6 mo) (MK-7123 50 mg vs. placebo). The stratum of current smokers, but not that of nonsmokers, showed significant improvement versus placebo in FEV1 (168 ml) and time-to-first exacerbation, and showed numerical improvement in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD score. MK-7123 caused a dose-dependent decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and reduced inflammatory biomarkers matrix metallopeptidase-9 and myeloperoxidase in plasma and sputum; ANC lower than 1.5 × 10(9)/L led to discontinuations with higher doses of MK-7123 (18% in the MK-7123 50-mg group vs. 1% in placebo). Plasma C-reactive protein and fibrinogen increased with MK-7123 treatment. Rates of infections at 6 months were similar in all groups., Conclusions: Treatment with MK-7123 50 mg versus placebo led to significant improvement in FEV1 in patients with COPD, suggesting clinically important antiinflammatory effects with CXCR2 antagonism, although dose-related discontinuations were observed because of ANC decreases with MK-7123. Greater response was observed in smokers versus ex-smokers. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01006616).

Corticosteroids are effective anti-inflammatory medications that are recommended for the control of persistent asthma. Little, however, is known about their influence on the perception of dyspnea, which, in turn, is important to the successful self-management of asthma. This paper provides a synopsis of available studies examining the impact of corticosteroids on the sensitivity to perceive dyspnea and presents possible mechanisms underlying this relationship. The results of these investigations are conflicting with some studies showing improved perception and other studies showing worsened perception of dyspnea after corticosteroid treatment. Thus, firm conclusions cannot be derived from the currently available data. Implications for future research, which is required to increase our understanding of potential influences of corticosteroids on the perception of dyspnea, are provided.

The present study aimed at comparing the effects of a dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function, indirect measures of airway inflammation and clinical scores during treatment with a leucotriene receptor antagonist. In 50 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 94% predicted), steroid doses (800 microg beclomethasone dipropionate) were first reduced to 50% and then to 25%, for 6 weeks each. One group received a placebo and the other group received montelukast (10 mg). The first reduction did not cause significant effects. During the second, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Daytime symptoms were not altered with placebo but were reduced by montelukast (p<0.05). Night-time symptoms were slightly elevated with placebo (p<0.05) but not montelukast, as well as the use of supplemental salbutamol. Changes in provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were mostly nonsignificant for both placebo and montelukast. These data demonstrate that a 75% reduction in the dose of steroid given to patients with asthma led to a deterioration in lung function not prevented by montelukast, whereas changes in clinical state seemed to favour montelukast treatment. It therefore appears that potential effects of montelukast, in the presence of low-dose steroids, could not be attributed to single indices of lung function or airway inflammation.

Systemic corticosteroids have been recommended as a therapeutic option in patients with moderate to severe COPD. In an early stage of the disease, i.e. chronic bronchitis with mild or no airflow obstruction, a trial with inhaled steroids could reveal potential benefits, particularly in terms of a modulation of airway inflammation. We therefore investigated the effect of inhaled fluticasone (1000 microg day(-1)) on markers of airway inflammation in 19 patients with chronic bronchitis (mean+/-SEM FEV1, 83.4+/-3.0% predicted; FEV1/VC, 67.5+/-2.4%) in a double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled manner. Visits were performed before and after two 4-week treatment periods. separated by a 4-week washout period. Lung function, the concentration of exhaled nitric oxide, differential cell counts in induced sputum and the number of cells positive for iNOS, as well as the levels of LDH, ECP, neutrophil elastase and IL-8 in sputum supernatants were determined. Although the total cell number decreased significantly after fluticasone (geometric mean 12.3 vs. 7.7 x 10(6)/ml; P<0.05) it was not significantly different from the change observed after placebo (14.2 vs. 10.6 x 10(6)/ml; n.s.). None of the other parameters showed statistically significant changes after fluticasone or placebo and the results did not depend on the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness. We conclude that in patients with chronic bronchitis short-term treatment with inhaled corticosterids did not improve lung function or inflammatory parameters to an extent which was statistically significant as compared to spontaneous variability.

Indirect assessments have shown a superior lung deposition of HFA–BDP (Ventolair®/Qvar®) compared to CFC–BDP (Aerobec®). The aim of this study was to assess the concentrations of BDP and its metabolite 17-BMP in airways and peripheral tissue from resected lung specimens after inhalation of these BDP formulations.Immediately prior to surgery for lung cancer, 10 patients inhaled 1000 μg of either CFC–BDP (n=5) or HFA–BDP (n=5). Mouthwash was collected after inhalation, and serum before, during, and after surgery.There was no significant difference between CFC and HFA in the concentration of 17-BMP in bronchi (median, 4365 vs 4121 pg/g tissue). After CFC, concentrations of 17-BMP were lower in peripheral tissue (1424 vs 2089 pg/g; ANCOVA, p=0.001) and in serum taken immediately after inhalation (688 vs 1219 pg/ml, p<0.01). Furthermore, the CFC group showed a higher concentration of BDP in the mouthwash (17,660 vs 1320 ng/ml, p<0.05), but the concentration of 17-BMP was lower (452 vs 1028 ng/ml, n.s.).These findings indicate a predominantly peripheral deposition of HFA–BDP, in line with previous data. They also provide evidence for a faster uptake and metabolism of HFA–BDP, probably because BDP is dissolved in HFA and has a smaller particle size distribution than the CFC suspensions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]