Search

Background: Failure of second or third‐line eradication treatment against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is principally caused by antimicrobial resistance and reduced treatment adherence. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culture‐based rescue eradication treatments in patients who have previously experienced failed eradication treatment. Methods: Patients who had persistent H. pylori infection following at least one eradication treatment were recommended to undergo culture analysis to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations of various antimicrobials via endoscopic resection. Consenting patients were assigned one of four therapeutic treatments based on an algorithm determined by antimicrobial resistance. These treatments consisted of 7 or 14‐day administration of clarithromycin‐containing proton pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapy; esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin (MEA) therapy; esomeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (quadruple) therapy; or lansoprazole, rifabutin, and amoxicillin (RLA) therapy. Eradication efficacy, adherence, and adverse events were assessed aside clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 132 patients were enrolled, with 84 patients completing the study. The overall resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and moxifloxacin were 13.1%, 83.3%, 47.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. The patients were allocated to the PPI triple (n = 11), MEA (n = 15), quadruple (n = 53), or RLA triple (n = 5) therapy group. The eradication rates in the intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses were 90.5% (76 of 84 patients) and 93.8% (76 of 81 patients), respectively. Nausea was the most frequent adverse event (25.0%). Conclusions: As a rescue therapy, culture‐based susceptibility‐guided eradication treatment was both effective and safe, even for patients exhibiting high antimicrobial resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Failure of bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication is frequently observed. To increase the eradication rate, comprehensive analyses need to be performed regarding risk factors of bismuth quadruple therapy failure based on complete standard culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. Methods: Patients with history of failed first therapy who had H. pylori colonies isolated from culture and successful minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test were enrolled. Esomeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (quadruple) therapies for 7 or 14 days were given. Eradication rate, treatment compliance, adverse events, and risk factors for the failure of bismuth quadruple therapy were analyzed. Results: A total 54 patients were enrolled. Overall eradication rate in the present study was 88.8%. The eradication rate for cases with metronidazole resistance such as MIC 8–16 μg/mL or 16–32 μg/mL was 92.8% (13/14). For cases with high level metronidazole resistance (MIC > 32 μg/mL), the eradication rate was only 60% (6/10). Multivariate analysis regarding compliance, treatment duration, age > 60, three kinds of metronidazole MICs, tetracycline MIC > 4 μg/mL, adverse events and any other parameters, "metronidazole resistance, high level (MIC > 32 μg/mL)" was the only independent risk factor for eradication failure (P = 0.007). Conclusion: For cases with metronidazole resistance at MIC > 32 μg/mL, rescue therapy other than bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]