Search

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of secukinumab on nail psoriasis and other psoriatic disease manifestations in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with concomitant nail psoriasis from the FUTURE 5 study., Methods: Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous secukinumab (300 mg load [300 mg], 150 mg load [150 mg], and 150 mg [no load]) or placebo weekly and then every 4 weeks starting Week 4. Key assessments through Week 104 in this post hoc analysis included modified Nail Psoriasis Severity (mNAPSI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90), resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and radiographic progression (assessed by vdH-mTSS)., Results: At baseline, 66.6% patients (663/996) had concomitant nail psoriasis. Baseline characteristics were balanced in the nail subset and comparable with the overall population. Secukinumab reduced mNAPSI score at Week 16 versus placebo: -8.71 (300 mg), -8.95 (150 mg), -7.55 (150 mg no load) versus -2.34 (placebo); all p<0.0001. Mean change from baseline in DLQI at Week 16 was -8.5 (300 mg), -7.4 (150 mg), -7.3 (150 mg no load) versus -2.4 (placebo); all p<0.0001. Overall, the improvements reported at Week 16 sustained through Week 104. The proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline in vdH-mTSS≤0.5) at Week 104 was 91.9% (300 mg) 78.9% (150 mg), and 82.4% (150 mg no load)., Conclusions: Secukinumab provided sustained improvements in nail disease, signs and symptoms of PsA, and a low rate of radiographic progression through 2 years in patients with concomitant nail psoriasis.

Objectives: Remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) states were compared in a clinical trial setting of the FUTURE 2 study (NCT01752634) using Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) composite indices in secukinumab treated PsA patients., Methods: The proportion of patients reaching DAPSA-REM (cut-off ≤4) or REM+LDA (≤14), and very low disease activity (VLDA; achieving 7/7 criteria) or MDA (≥5/7), were compared in the overall population, by prior use of anti-TNF therapy, and by time since diagnosis using as observed data. The proportion of patients who met individual core component and other variables of interest were also computed to assess residual disease activity in DAPSA-REM/REM+LDA states and VLDA/MDA responses. The relationship between DAPSA/MDA and patient reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life, physical function, and fatigue were assessed using mixed model for repeated measures., Results: More patients could achieve DAPSA-REM or DAPSA-REM+LDA status than VLDA or MDA responses, respectively, at all the time points in the overall population, irrespective of anti‒TNF status and time since diagnosis. Higher proportion of patients reaching DAPSA-REM or VLDA achieved more thresholds of core components (joints, pain, patient and physician global assessments, and function) than DAPSA-REM+LDA or MDA over Week 104. There were differences with numerically higher proportion of patients achieving patient global assessment ≤10 mm and ≤20 mm, and physician global assessment ≤10 mm with MDA than with DAPSA-REM+LDA, and patient pain VAS ≤15 mm, PASI ≤1, HAQ ≤0.5 with VLDA or MDA than with DAPSA-REM or DAPSA-REM+LDA, respectively, through 104 weeks. Improvements in PROs were significantly better for patients in DAPSA-REM+LDA versus DAPSA-moderate+high disease activity status, and for MDA responders versus non-responders., Conclusion: These analysis add to the evidence that both DAPSA and MDA composite index measures can be used for evaluation of the status and treatment response utilizing a treat to target approach in PsA patients in a clinical trial setting and improve patient health related outcomes., Funding: The study and analysis was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests LCC: Consultant and honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, and UCB PN: Research grants and honoraria: Novartis, AbbVie, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, Lilly, and Celgene TKK: Consultant: AbbVie, Biogen, Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Oktal, Hospira/Pfizer, Sandoz, Eli Lilly and UCB; Speakers bureau: Biogen, Celltrion, Oktal, Hospira/Pfizer, Sandoz, and Eli Lilly LG: Grant/research support: BMS, UCB, Eli Lilly and Pfizer; Consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB PJM: Grant/research support, Consultant and Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB LR: Consultant for: Novartis through employment at RTI, Employee of: RTI Health Solutions LP: Shareholder and employee of Novartis SJ: Shareholder and employee of Novartis KG: Shareholder and employee of Novartis CG: Shareholder and employee of Novartis and Shareholder of BMS JS: Grant/research support: AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celltrion, Gilead, ILTOO, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB. Consultant: AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celltrion, Gilead, ILTOO, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies., Method: Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3-6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment., Results: A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3-6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg., Conclusion: Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis., Trial Registration: FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012) FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013).