Search

Purpose: To report real-world clinical evidence of brolucizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Methods: This study included 37 eyes with nAMD treated with intravitreal injections of brolucizumab. The main outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, central retinal thickness (CRT), and serious ocular adverse events. Intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), hyperreflective foci, macular atrophy, and retinal pigment epithelial tears were evaluated., Results: The mean BCVA of all patients showed a post-treatment value of 0.47 ± 0.33 log of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), compared to a baseline measure of 0.50 ± 0.28 LogMAR ( P = 0.372). For treatment-naïve patients, a non-statistically significant improvement in BCVA was observed ( P = 0.116). Both treatment-naive patients and the entire patient cohort exhibited a statistically significant improvement in the mean CRT after injections. Majority of patients exhibited improvements in optical coherence tomography findings, specifically in the resolution of IRF, SRF, SHRM, and PEDs. Four eyes experienced ocular adverse events in the form of intraocular inflammation., Conclusion: Brolucizumab did not yield a substantial improvement in BCVA, but it exhibited efficacy in reducing CRT in the entire study population and treatment-naive patients with nAMD. Our study identified intraocular inflammation as a significant adverse event with brolucizumab. Thus, precise patient selection, education, and vigilant inflammation monitoring are crucial for patients undergoing this treatment., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.)

Purpose: To investigate outcomes after Brolucizumab injection in naïve treatment or non-responder patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: It is a retrospective, comparative, cohort study conducted at the tertiary referral center of the University Hospital Polyclinic of Bari, for 5 years, from November 2017 until May 2022. 41 eyes with wet-AMD (w-AMD) were included, undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections. The sample was divided into two groups, the Bro-Switch group, and the Bro-Naïve group. The Bro-Switch group previously received a slot of other anti-VEGF intravitreal drugs. The Bro-Naïve group received Brolucizumab (Bro) as the first treatment. The pigment epithelium detachment (PED) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes before and after Bro-injection were evaluated., Results: A significant reduction in PED measurement was registered in all eyes treated with Bro-injection ( p  = 0.35). The Bro-Naïve group improved better in PED measurement (mean difference: 297.92 ± 72,32) as compared to the Bro-Switch group (mean difference: 185.06 ± 11.07). On the contrary, no significant reduction in BCVA in the two groups was recorded ( p  = 0.66)., Conclusion: We suggest Bro-injection for w-AMD as effective anatomical outcomes in PED flattening, but not similar in visual results. Although this study evaluated short-term outcomes, the hopeful results can lead to interesting medium-long time effects.

Purpose: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)., Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups., Results: Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes) and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution., Conclusion: Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management., (© 2024 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To measure aqueous flare levels in treatment naïve eyes suffering from wet age- related macular degeneration (wAMD) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab., Methods: Patients with treatment naïve wAMD in one eye were prospectively enrolled. Flare levels were measured with laser flare photometry at baseline, 1 day and 1 month after each of the 3 monthly injections during the loading phase., Results: Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients aged 76.7 ± 6.0 years were enrolled. Flare values were 10.6 ± 3.7 photons/msec at baseline and 12.6 ± 5.8 photons/msec at the last follow up visit, 1 month after the third injection ( p  = 0.289, repeated measures ANOVA). The mean change in flare after the first injection was 4.2 ± 3.6. photons/msec, 6.6 ± 8.9 photons/msec after the 2nd and 8.6 ± 20.8 photons/msec after the 3rd injection ( p  = 0.640, repeated measures ANOVA). No patient had clinical signs of intraocular inflammation., Conclusions: Eyes receiving brolucizumab injections for wAMD showed similar flare at baseline, during and 1 month after completion of three-monthly intravitreal injections. There was no evidence of subclinical inflammation during the loading phase of brolucizumab based on laser flare photometry measurements., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis., Materials and Methods: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. Stata and RevMan5.4 were applied for meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Data on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CSFT), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF), participants with ≥1 serious adverse events, and participants with ≥1 adverse events were analyzed., Results: Six studies were finally included. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences in BCVA [SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-0.17 to -0.23], P < 0.05], the presence of IRF and/or SRF [RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.56-0.79], P < 0.05], and the safety of participants with ≥1 serious adverse events [RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.39-0.84], P < 0.05] between the experimental group and the control group. However, no statistical differences were observed in CSFT [SMD = -1.16, 95% CI [-2.79 to 0.47], P > 0.05] or the safety of participants with ≥1 adverse events [RR = 1.07, 95% CI [0.97-1.17], P > 0.05]., Conclusions: Compared to other anti-VEGF drugs such as Aflibercept and Ranibizumab, intravitreal injection of 6 mg Brolucizumab is more effective and safer for n-AMD, especially in the presence of IRF and/or SRF, and for participants with ≥1 serious adverse events., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024 Dou and Jiang.)

Purpose: to analyze the structural changes of choroidal thickness in patients with brolucizumab-related exudative vitritis after intravitreal injection, using EDI-OCT., Methods: One hundred eyes of one hundred patients, affected by exudative age related-macular degeneration treated with brolucizumab intravitreal injection between January 2022 and august 2023 at Eye clinic of University of Federico II Naples, were enrolled. All eyes underwent macular examination using Enhanced Deep Imaging-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering inc.) preoperatively and at each postoperative check (1, 3, 6, 12 months). Anterior segment evaluation at slit lamp before and after injection was performed., Results: Of the 100 treated eyes, 4 showed inflammatory signs related to exudative vitreitis, with inflammation signs at slit lamp examination and confirmed by OCT and B scan ecography. EDI-OCT revealed, in all of these 4 patients, a significant increase of choroidal thickness compared to baseline., Conclusion: choroidal thickness could be correlated in the inflammatory response generated in patients undergoing treatment with brolucizumab., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: To report a case of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab for a treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patient without comorbid cardiovascular disease history., Case Presentation: A 79-year-old Asian male without a cardiovascular disease history such as diabetes or hypertension underwent three times of monthly consecutive intravitreal brolucizumab injections for treatment of progressed nAMD in his left eye. Two days after the third injection, the patient presented with acute painless visual loss. Typical retinal whitening with a cherry red spot was observed on the fundus photograph, and retinal swelling with hyper-reflectivity was also identified on the optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan. On the fundus fluorescein angiography, arm-to-retina time and arteriovenous transit time were remarkedly delayed, but clinical findings suggesting an intraocular inflammation (IOI) were not observed. Therefore, CRAO was diagnosed, and anterior chamber paracentesis was administrated immediately. However, there had been no improvement in visual acuity during the follow-up period of three months, despite prolonged oral steroid and anti-platelet agent medication., Conclusions: In rare cases, patients without cardiovascular comorbidities can develop CRAO after intravitreal brolucizumab injection without gross evidence of IOI. Therefore, CRAO should always be in consideration and careful observation is required after intravitreal brolucizumab injection for nAMD patients with old age, even if the patient does not have any other cardiovascular disease history., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study investigates the visual outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients who developed intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab injection (IVBr)., Methods: We studied 285 eyes of 279 cases diagnosed with nAMD and focused on 18 eyes (6.3%) of 17 cases which developed IOI after IVBr. IVBr was performed either on the initial treatment or for switching of other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents during January 2020 to December 2021. We evaluated clinical features and the course of treatment of a 6-month follow-up after IOI occurred., Results: Of 17 cases, 9 cases were male, 8 cases were female. Baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.36, BCVA before IOI occurred was 0.30, and BCVA when IOI occurred was 0.43. 16 eyes (88.9%) had symptoms such as visual loss or floaters when IOI occurred. On the other hand, the remaining 2 eyes (11.1%) had no symptoms. 11 eyes (61.1%) had only IOI, while the remaining 7 eyes (38.9%) had IOI and perivascular sheathing. Steroid sub-tenon injection was performed on 1 eye (5.6%), steroid eye drops were used in 11 eyes (61.1%), and 6 eyes (33.3%) were followed-up without treatment. Neovascular AMD recurred in 16 eyes (88.9%) after IOI occurred and were treated with aflibercept. VA at 3 and 6 months after IOI occurred were significantly improved to 0.34 and 0.30, respectively (P = 0.09 at 3 months and P = 0.02 at 6 months). The symptoms of patients were improved in all cases. We were able to stop steroid treatment in all cases., Conclusions: IOI occurred in 6.3% of nAMD patients after IVBr treatment. All of which showed significant improvement from logMAR of 0.43 to 0.30 with steroid treatment or without any treatment. We should consider the possibility of IOI after IVBr as a complication, however, they have a relatively good prognosis if treated at an early stage., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hirono et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

This retrospective study aimed to determine the short-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab treatment for recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting in Taiwan. Recalcitrant nAMD patients who were treated with brolucizumab from November 2021 to August 2022 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were included. Patients were followed for 3 months after switching to brolucizumab. The primary outcomes were changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to the third month. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), proportion of patients with subretinal and intraretinal fluid (SRF and IRF), and change in pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height from baseline to the third month. The significance level was considered as p < .05 in all tests. A total of 38 patients (40 eyes) with a mean (±SD) age of 76.3 (±10.84) years were included. The baseline BCVA was 0.92±0.64 logMAR, and the CRT and PED height were 329.0±171.18 and 189.8±114.94 um, respectively. The patients had a significant reduction in CRT and resolution of IRF and SRF from baseline to the third month. There were numerical improvements in mean BCVA and PED height, but they were not significant. The percentages of achieving at least 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 logMAR (equivalent to 5, 10, 15 ETDRS letters) visual gain were 50%, 37.5%, and 30%, respectively, during the first 3 months of follow-up. No IOI occurred in these patients. This study demonstrated that brolucizumab had good short-term structural and functional efficacy in recalcitrant nAMD patients., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: C.C.W.: consultant of Bayer and Novartis; S.C.C: nil; T.C.L.: consultant of Roche, Bayer, Norvartis, and Allergan; Y.M.H.: nil; Y.B.C.: consultant of Bayer; D.K.H.: consultant of Roche, Bayer, Norvartis, and Allergan; S.J.C.: consultant of Roche, Bayer, receive travel grant and lecture fee from Novartis, Allergan., (Copyright: © 2024 Weng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: To analyze anatomic and functional response to intravitreal brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration recalcitrant to previous intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies., Methods: In this monocentric, one arm, retrospective study, eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) resistant to other intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors were switched to intravitreal brolucizumab. All patients underwent ophthalmological examinations at baseline and in regular follow-up intervals. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), Goldmann tonometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) characteristics were analyzed at initiation of anti-VEGF treatment, at treatment switch, and at the end of brolucizumab loading phase., Results: The study included 20 eyes of 18 consecutively treated patients (age: 77 ± 6 years). All eyes had macular neovascularization with PED. Previous treatments included intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab and had not resulted in a significant improvement in BRVA (0.5 ± 0.5 logMAR vs 0.5 ± 0.6 logMAR) or mean CRT (320 ± 60 µm vs 313 ± 83 µm) up to treatment switch to brolucizumab. At the end of the brolucizumab loading phase, there was significant improvement for both BRVA (0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR, P < 0.05) and CRT (264 ± 55 µm, P  < 0.05). Under previous anti-VEGF therapy, there was a significant increase/deterioration in both PED area (2.68 mm 2 to 5.18 mm 2 , P  < 0.05) and PED volume (0.39 mm 3 to 1.07 mm 3 , P  < 0.05); however, both parameters improved after switching to brolucizumab (3.81 mm 2 and 0.37 mm 3 , P  < 0.05)., Conclusion: Our results suggest a favourable anatomical and visual response after treatment switch to brolucizumab in patients with nAMD refractory to previous anti-VEGF agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional and morphologic changes in the loading phase between patients with treatment-naïve macular neovascularization (MNV) due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with either intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) or intravitreal faricimab (IVF) injections in a clinical setting., Methods: We retrospectively studied 92 consecutive eyes of 90 patients with neovascular nAMD who were scheduled to receive IVBr (42 eyes of 41 patients) or IVF (50 eyes of 49 patients) injections between October 2021 and December 2022. All patients received three consecutive monthly injections of 6.0 mg/0.05 mL brolucizumab or 6.0 mg/0.05 mL faricimab. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) at baseline and 1, 2, and 4 months after the initial treatment were measured and compared between the groups., Results: Thirty-seven eyes in IVBr group and forty-seven eyes in IVF group who finished treatments in the loading phase were assessed at the follow-up examination. The BCVA, CFT, and CCT changed significantly after loading phase in both groups (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). The IVBr group had more rapid improvement of the BCVA (P = 0.037) at 1 month than the IVF group, but there was no difference at 4 months (P = 0.367). The CFT and CCT decreases tended to be greater in the IVBr group than in the IVF group throughout the follow-up period. Of the five eyes excluded from the IVBr group, one eye (2.4%) each had intraocular inflammation (IOI) and was a non-responder, and two eyes (4.8%) had retinal pigment epithelial tears after treatment. Of the three eyes excluded from the IVF group, two eyes (4.0%) did not respond to the treatment., Conclusions: Both IVBr and IVF injections were well-tolerated and improved the VA in treatment-naïve patients with MNV due to nAMD after a loading phase, although IVBr caused a trend toward faster visual improvements in the BCVA. The IVBr group also had greater reductions of the CFT and CCT than the IVF group. However, the potential for adverse events and no response to treatment with each drug are considerations., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

A new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent, brolucizumab, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2019. We evaluated whether brolucizumab reduces the treatment burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after switching by examining 1-year treatment outcomes in a real-world setting. This retrospective single-institution study included 107 consecutive eyes with nAMD treated with brolucizumab. Among these eyes, 30 with treatment-naïve nAMD and 77 treated with other anti-VEGF agents for more than a year were included. All eyes were managed using a treat and extend (TAE) or modified TAE regimen. The last injection intervals at 52 weeks were 12.9 and 12.1 weeks in the treatment-naïve and switch therapy groups, respectively. Among switch therapy group patients whose pre-switch injection intervals were shorter than 120 days (n = 62 eyes), the injection interval was significantly longer after the switch than before, with a mean difference of 2.7 weeks (P < 0.0001). Intraocular inflammation events occurred in 2 and 7 treatment-naïve and switch therapy patients, respectively. In conclusion, brolucizumab might reduce the treatment burden in patients who required the injection of other anti-VEGF agents with a 120-day interval or shorter, despite a relatively high discontinuation rate due to intraocular inflammation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

To report long-term outcomes of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment. Records from 74 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Both naïve eyes and those previously treated with other antiVEGF agents were included. Primary outcomes included variation in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) dimensions. Outcomes were reviewed after the loading phase, at week 24, and at last follow-up. IOI occurrence represented the secondary outcome. BCVA improved significantly in both groups. In switched eyes, IRF and SRF were significantly reduced at every timepoint, with CST reduction from week 24 (p = 0.005). In naïve group, CST decreased from the loading phase (p = 0.006) and all patients showed dry macula from week 24. A significant reduction in PED maximum high was demonstrated in both groups. In seven naïve eyes, PED completely reabsorbed; a slight increase in PED horizontal maximal diameter was also observed from week 24. IOI occurred in 5.4% of cases. In conclusion, brolucizumab showed a strong drying effect, permitting functional improvement together with fluid reabsorption and an encouraging modification of PED dimension, especially on naïve patients. These results together with the extension of treatment intervals make brolucizumab an efficient therapeutic strategy for nAMD., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study analyzes the effectiveness and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in real clinical practice., Material and Methods: The study included patients with nAMD who received brolucizumab treatment and evaluated the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), macular volume, as well as the number of injections and adverse events., Result: The group of previously treated patients included 28 subjects (28 eyes) that were switched to brolucizumab with a loading phase. By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.43±0.29 to 0.33±0.27 LogMAR ( p =0.11), CRT decreased from 281.5±58.2 to 239.9±45.6 µm ( p =0.02). The group of previously untreated patients included 29 subjects (29 eyes). By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.47±0.32 to 0.40±0.30 LogMAR ( p =0.09), CRT decreased from 333.2±77.3 to 226.2±49.6 µm ( p <0.001). Patients received 6.3±0.7 injections. In this group, baseline choroidal thickness showed a statistically significant correlation with final visual acuity ( r =0.54; p <0.05) and CRT ( r = -0.5; p <0.05). The group of previously treated patients switched without a loading phase included 18 patients (18 eyes). By 6 months, BCVA changed from 0.42±0.2 to 0.37±0.26 LogMAR ( p =0.42). CRT remained stable at 285.6±56.9 µm ( p =0.97). No adverse events related to intraocular inflammation were reported during the course of 385 injections., Conclusion: Brolucizumab therapy helps achieve significant anatomical and functional improvements in real clinical practice both in patients switched from previous treatments and in treatment-naïve patients. Greater baseline choroidal thickness may be associated with better anatomical and functional outcomes with brolucizumab treatment.

Intravitreal injections (IVI) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are actively used in the treatment of various ophthalmic pathologies. In addition to the pronounced therapeutic effect of anti-VEGF drugs described in the literature, a number of data on adverse effects associated with the use of IVI, including from the lens, have now been accumulated. Prevention of possible side effects of this type of treatment requires further investigation., Purpose: The study evaluates the changes in spectrofluorometric parameters of the lens after intravitreal injections of brolucizumab in eyes with native lens., Material and Methods: The study included 13 people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who received IVI of brolucizumab. All patients were over 40 years old; changes in central retinal thickness in the macular area exceeded 300 μ m according to optical coherence tomography. Spectrofluorimetric indicators of the lens were studied before and after injections of the drug in both eyes. The spectra were analyzed in the wavelength range 412-698 nm to record the changes in the content of non-tryptophan fluorophore molecules in the lens., Results: Spectrofluorimetry revealed metabolic changes in the native lens after intravitreal injections of the drug brolucizumab. No such changes were observed in the lens of the eyes not injected with the drug (the «Control» group). The proposed investigation technique involves prospective assessment of the safety of various molecules injected intravitreally in terms of cataract development at various times after the injection., Conclusion: Spectrofluorimetry can be used for identifying initial metabolic changes in the lens. It is a promising method for assessing the molecules used in intravitreal injections in terms of their safety for the native lens, as well as for development of detailed instructions for clinically substantiated use of drugs with adverse effects in the form of cataract induction. According to spectrofluorimetry, IVI of the drug brolucizumab affects metabolic changes in the lens.

Introduction: To analyze visual and anatomical outcomes after switch to intravitreal brolucizumab therapy in eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents., Methods: Retrospective study of eyes with nAMD that underwent intravitreal brolucizumab at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) or San Rocco Clinical Institute (Ome, Italy) between January 2021 and July 2022. All study eyes had persistent residual retinal fluid after receiving at least 3 intravitreal injections of other anti-VEGF agents prior to switch to brolucizumab., Results: Among 66 eyes from 60 patients (35 males; mean age 76.5 ± 7.4 years) with nAMD, 43 (65.2%) eyes received a complete loading dose of 3 brolucizumab injections, while 15 (22.7%) and 8 (12.1%) eyes were treated with 2 or 1 brolucizumab injections, respectively. The average number of brolucizumab injections was 2.5 during 4.0 ± 2.0 months (mean interval between two injections of 51.2 days). Lower letter gains (&lt;5 letter improvement from baseline) were found in eyes that did not complete a loading dose, after a greater number of previous anti-VEGF injections, after a longer duration of disease, and in eyes with a greater rate of macular atrophy at baseline. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were found after switch to brolucizumab., Conclusion: nAMD eyes with persistent residual retinal fluid despite frequent anti-VEGF treatment can still gain functional and anatomical improvements after switch to brolucizumab therapy. Despite a relevant heterogeneity in patients' response to brolucizumab, we identified potential biomarkers for functional and anatomical improvement., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: To collect data on efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to support comparability to brolucizumab product used in the Phase III HAWK and HARRIER studies. Methods: The HAWK extension study was a 24-week, double-masked, multicenter study of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who completed the 96-week HAWK core study. All patients were planned to receive three intravitreal injections of either brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. Key endpoint measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness from baseline, and incidence and characteristics of treatment emergent adverse events. Results: Best-corrected visual acuity gain and central subfield thickness reduction observed at the end of the core study were maintained to Week 24 of the extension study. There was no indication of difference in the safety profile of the brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization and the brolucizumab 3 mg or 6 mg drug product used in the Phase III clinical trials. Conclusions: Efficacy and safety with the intended commercial formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients was consistent with that observed in the Phase III studies.

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of a 6-month follow-up after switching to brolucizumab from aflibercept to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Japanese patients., Study Design: Retrospective observational study., Methods: We studied 45 consecutive eyes of 42 patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD, who were switched to intravitreal brolucizumab injection (IVBr) after receiving intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) using a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen. Patients who had brolucizumab-associated intraocular inflammation (IOI) were excluded from the study. The mean changes in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), and treatment intervals were evaluated at 6 months after the switch to IVBr., Results: One eye of 1 patient was excluded because of IOI after the switch; 44 eyes of 41 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean logMAR BCVA was maintained throughout the follow-up period when compared with the baseline value (P > .05 at 6 months). However, the mean CFT and CCT at 6 months had decreased significantly (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). The mean treatment interval was extended from 5.75 to 8.12 weeks., Conclusion: Switching to brolucizumab from aflibercept using a TAE regimen might be effective for maintaining functional outcomes and extending intervals in Japanese patients with AMD., (© 2022. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.)

Untreated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) can lead to severe and permanent visual impairment. The chronic nature of the disease can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and an economic and time burden on medical retina (MR) services, with the care need outweighing the growth of resources that clinical services can access. The introduction of a new treatment into clinical services can be challenging, especially for services that are already under capacity constraints. Guidance for practical implementation is therefore helpful. Roundtable meetings, facilitated by Novartis UK, between a working group of MR experts with experience of leading and managing NHS retinal services in the intravitreal era were conducted between 2020 and 2021. These meetings explored various aspects and challenges of introducing a new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy to the UK medical retina services. Provision of clear expert recommendations and practical guidance nationally, that can be adapted locally as required to support clinicians and healthcare professionals (HCPs), is valuable in supporting the introduction of a new anti-VEGF therapy within the NHS environment. The experts provide ophthalmologic HCPs with a collation of insights and recommendations to support the introduction and delivery of brolucizumab in their local service in the face of current and projected growth in demand for retina care., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion represent some of the commonest degenerative conditions that lead to severe vision impairment in the developed countries. The gold standard treatment of complications associated with these conditions is the intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Brolucizumab is a newly developed, humanised, single-chain fragment of a monoclonal antibody binding all VEGF-A isoforms, which was recently approved for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal brolucizumab promises to reduce treatment burden for nAMD patients by achieving comparable therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. Promising also appears its use for the treatment of more challenging maculopathies like diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of brolucizumab and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of degenerative macular disorders., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Karasavvidou et al.)

Purpose: To investigate short-term treatment outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a Japanese multicenter study., Study Design: Retrospective case control study METHODS: The subjects were 58 eyes of 57 patients with neovascular AMD (43 men and 14 women, mean age 74.6 years) of whom 43 eyes of 42 patients completed initial loading of 3 monthly IVBr injections and were followed for more than 3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, anatomical outcomes, and complications were investigated., Results: Of the 43 eyes that completed loading doses, the AMD subtype was type 1 and type 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) in 51%, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in 42%, and type 3 MNV in 7%. At 3 months after initiating treatment, BCVA significantly improved (P = 0.002) and central retinal thickness significantly decreased (P < 0.0001). At 3 months, complete retinal and subretinal fluid resolution was achieved in 91% of all eyes and complete regression of polypoidal lesions was achieved in 82% of PCV eyes. Iritis occurred in 8 eyes of 8 patients (14%), but resolved using topical or subtenon corticosteroid injection without visual loss in all cases., Conclusions: IVBr for treatment-naïve neovascular AMD was effective in the short-term, achieving significantly improved BCVA, good retinal fluid resolution, and a high rate of polypoidal lesion regression. However, iritis was noted in 14% of patients which may limit use of this drug., (© 2022. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.)

Purpose: To describe the adverse events associated with brolucizumab, in particular the sequence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO)., Methods: This was an unmasked post hoc analysis of the randomized HAWK/HARRIER clinical trials. Patients with neovascular AMD in the brolucizumab arms of the trials were included. IOI-related adverse events reported by study investigators were analyzed to determine early signs and the time course of IOI-related adverse events, using a subgroup of patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified in an independent unmasked post hoc review by an external safety review committee. A limited literature review on IOI following anti-VEGF therapy was also conducted., Results: Among 50 patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified by the safety review committee, 12 had RV or RO adverse events reported by the investigators. For 6 of 12, IOI (other than RV) was reported before RV or RO. The duration from the first IOI adverse event to the first RV or RO adverse event ranged from 16 to 171 days for 5 patients and was 553 days for 1 patient. Four of the 6 patients received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection on or after the date of the first IOI adverse event and before the first RV or RO adverse event., Conclusions: IOI may precede RV or RO in some patients treated with brolucizumab., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To analyze and compare the effects of intravitreal brolucizumab versus aflibercept on systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration., Methods: In this prospective interventional case series study, brolucizumab (6.0 mg/50 µL) or aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 µL) was injected intravitreally in 30 patients each. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 7 days and 28 days after the first injection. Systemic VEGF-A levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Thirty healthy individuals served as controls., Results: The median baseline systemic VEGF-A levels in the brolucizumab, aflibercept, and control groups were 10.8 (8.0-13.2), 12.0 (8.0-18.5), and 10.0 (8.0-15.1) pg/mL, respectively (P = 0.315). In the brolucizumab group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-11.5) pg/mL on Day 7 (P = 0.0254) and to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 28 (P < 0.001). In the aflibercept group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 7 (P < 0.001) but returned to the baseline level, 12.5 (8.5-14.6) pg/mL, on Day 28 (P = 0.120). Vascular endothelial growth factor-A levels were significantly different between the treatment groups after 28 days (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Intravitreal brolucizumab resulted in a sustained reduction of systemic VEGF-A levels until 28 days posttreatment, which raises concerns regarding its safety and long-term effects., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc.)

Purpose: This analysis of the pivotal phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials aimed to provide insights on the timing of presentation, management, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI)-related adverse events (AEs), as reported by investigators in these trials., Design: Post hoc analysis of investigator-reported IOI-related AEs in HAWK and HARRIER., Participants: Of 1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes (3 or 6 mg), 49 eyes demonstrated at least 1 IOI-related AE and were included in this analysis., Methods: Reports of IOI-related AEs were analyzed and descriptive statistics were provided for outcome measures., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence and description of eyes with IOI-related AEs, timing of presentation, management, clinical outcomes, and brolucizumab treatment after the first IOI-related AE., Results: Seventy IOI-related AEs were reported in 49 eyes. Before the onset of first IOI-related AE, eyes received a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3.9 ± 2.2 brolucizumab injections. Median time to first IOI-related AE from the last administered brolucizumab injection was 18.0 days (interquartile range, 4.0-29.0 days). Of the 70 AEs, 61 (87.1%) were treated, most with topical corticosteroids; systemic and intraocular corticosteroids were used for 3 AEs each. Overall, inflammation resolved completely in 39 eyes (79.6%), resolved with sequelae in 5 eyes (10.2%), and did not resolve in 5 eyes (10.2%) by end-of-study (EOS). Overall, the mean ± SD best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to EOS, before AE to the lowest BCVA in 3 months after AE, and from before AE to EOS were -0.84 ± 20.6 , -16.31 ± 17.6, and -0.22 ± 18.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, respectively. Of the 36 eyes (73.5%) that continued with brolucizumab therapy after the first IOI-related AE, 24 completed the trials and 12 discontinued; mean ± SD BCVA change in these eyes was 2.6 ± 17.6, 7.8 ± 13.2, and -7.7 ± 21.3 ETDRS letters, respectively, from baseline to EOS. The remaining 13 eyes (26.5%) were not treated with brolucizumab after first IOI-related AE and showed a mean ± SD BCVA change of -10.4 ± 25.5 ETDRS letters from baseline to EOS., Conclusions: Findings of this analysis highlight the need for continued vigilance and monitoring for any signs of IOI-related events in patients receiving brolucizumab., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is characterized by exudation of fluid from abnormally growing blood vessels in the macula. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is standard treatment for nAMD. Fluid resolution is used both as an indicator of disease control and to guide the frequency of treatment because of anti-VEGF therapy effectiveness in reducing neovascularization-related exudation. Herein reports a post hoc assessment of the HAWK and HARRIER trials comparing the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab with aflibercept in patients with nAMD., Materials and Methods: HAWK randomized 1,078 patients with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to AMD in the study eye to receive brolucizumab 3, 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. In HARRIER, 739 patients received brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. Brolucizumab was injected at weeks 0, 4, and 8, and thereafter q12w unless disease activity was identified (injection interval: q8w). Aflibercept was injected q8w after the loading phase, aligned with approved dosing at study initiation. The objective of this analysis was to assess effects of brolucizumab versus aflibercept on retinal fluid resolution during two phase 3 trials (HAWK and HARRIER) in patients with nAMD. Anatomical assessments for intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) were performed every 4 weeks by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Sustained dryness was defined as a patient being fluid-free (SRF and IRF) on ≥3 consecutive visits. Time to sustained dryness was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: At week 96, fluid resolution (absence of IRF and SRF) was achieved by more brolucizumab- (6 mg; 76.1%) versus aflibercept-treated patients (63.1%; p = 0.0002, HAWK); 75.4% versus 61.8% (p < 0.0001, HARRIER). More patients achieved sustained dryness with brolucizumab versus aflibercept: at 96 weeks, 87.9% (brolucizumab 3 mg) and 86.1% (brolucizumab 6 mg) versus 82.0% (aflibercept) in HAWK, and 91.2% (brolucizumab) versus 78.0% (aflibercept) in HARRIER. Sustained dryness was achieved faster and hence with fewer brolucizumab injections., Discussion/conclusion: Brolucizumab dried the macula in patients with nAMD faster and to a greater degree than aflibercept. Achieving sustained dryness faster, and therefore with fewer injections, provides an opportunity for earlier decisions relating to treatment interval extension potentially reducing treatment burden., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: To assess longitudinally the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), and the sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) compartment in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: Post hoc analysis of the OSPREY clinical trial, a prospective, double-masked, phase 2 study comparing brolucizumab 6 mg with aflibercept 2 mg over 56 weeks., Participants: Participants with treatment-naïve nAMD at the initiation of the trial were included in the analysis., Methods: Eyes were evaluated with spectral-domain OCT at 4-week intervals in the OSPREY trial (n = 81). Spectral-domain OCT scans collected from each visit were segmented automatically using a proprietary, machine learning-enabled higher-order feature-extraction platform for retinal layer, SHRM, and sub-RPE boundary lines, which were evaluated and corrected as needed by masked trained graders. The current analysis focused only on patients evaluated with the Cirrus (Zeiss) platform (n = 28)., Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included change from baseline in EZ-RPE (i.e., photoreceptor outer segment) volume, EZ-RPE central subfield thickness (CST), total EZ attenuation, SHRM volume, SHRM CST, and total sub-RPE volume. The correlation between each of these measures and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at each visit was evaluated., Results: EZ-RPE volume and EZ-RPE CST showed significant increases, and total EZ attenuation, SHRM volume, SHRM CST, and total sub-RPE volume showed significant decreases from baseline at each visit from weeks 4 through 56 (P < 0.05 at each visit). Ellipsoid zone integrity measures and SHRM volume correlated significantly with BCVA at most visits (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between total sub-RPE volume and BCVA., Conclusions: EZ integrity, SHRM, and sub-RPE disease features in eyes with nAMD showed improvement as early as week 4 of anti-VEGF treatment. EZ integrity measures and SHRM volume were predictors of visual acuity over the first year of treatment., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Brolucizumab is a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent with clinical trials demonstrating excellent efficacy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in both visual and anatomic outcomes. However, there is concern of intraocular inflammation (IOI), and we propose concurrent subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) to prevent IOI., Patient Concern: A 73-year-old man was treated with aflibercept for neovascular AMD in his right eye. Despite 11 months of monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, optical coherence tomography demonstrated persistent exudation. Ten days following his second brolucizumab injection, the patient presented with decreased vision due to vitritis in his right eye., Diagnosis: Brolucizumab-related IOI in neovascular AMD refractory to aflibercept., Interventions: A combination therapy involving of intravitreal brolucizumab and STTA., Outcomes: The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor was changed back to aflibercept; however, exudation persisted. Therefore, a combination therapy involving STTA (5 mg/0.5 mL) and intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL) was performed to treat the exudation and as prophylaxis to recurrent IOI. Combination therapy achieved no recurrent IOI and resolution of exudation with 8-week treatment intervals., Lessons: This case might indicate that STTA is not only an optimal treatment option for brolucizumab-related IOI but also a preventive agent for this condition., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in geriatric population. Intravitreal (IVT) injections are popular clinical option. Biologics and small molecules offer efficacy but relatively shorter half-life after intravitreal injections. To address these challenges, numerous technologies and therapies are under development. Most of these strategies aim to reduce the frequency of injections, thereby increasing patient compliance and reducing patient-associated burden. Unlike IVT frequent injections, molecular therapies such as cell therapy and gene therapy offer restoration ability hence gained a lot of traction. The recent approval of ocular gene therapy for inherited disease offers new hope in this direction. However, until such breakthrough therapies are available to the majority of patients, antibody therapeutics will be on the shelf, continuing to provide therapeutic benefits. The present review aims to highlight the status of pre-clinical and clinical studies of neovascular AMD treatment modalities including Anti-VEGF therapy, upcoming bispecific antibodies, small molecules, port delivery systems, photodynamic therapy, radiation therapy, gene therapy, cell therapy, and combination therapies.

Purpose: An independent Safety Review Committee (SRC), supported by Novartis Pharma AG, analyzed investigator-reported cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI), endophthalmitis, and retinal arterial occlusion in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: A post hoc analysis of a subset of data from two 2-year, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled randomized phase 3 trials (NCT02307682, NCT02434328)., Participants: Patients (N = 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye were randomized and treated in HAWK/HARRIER. The SRC reviewed data from cases of investigator-reported IOI (60/1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes; 8/729 aflibercept-treated eyes)., Methods: The SRC received details and images (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and OCT) for all investigator-determined cases of IOI, retinal arterial occlusion, and endophthalmitis. Cases were reviewed in detail by ≥2 readers, then adjudicated by the SRC as a group., Main Outcome Measures: Within this patient subset: incidence of IOI, signs and incidence of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion, and visual acuity loss; time since first brolucizumab injection to IOI event onset; and frequency of visual acuity loss after brolucizumab injection by time of first IOI event onset., Results: Fifty brolucizumab-treated eyes were considered to have definite/probable drug-related events within the spectrum of IOI, retinal vasculitis, and/or vascular occlusion. On the basis of these cases, incidence of definite/probable IOI was 4.6% (IOI + vasculitis, 3.3%; IOI + vasculitis + occlusion, 2.1%). There were 8 cases (incidence 0.74%) of at least moderate visual acuity loss (≥15 ETDRS letters) in eyes with IOI (7 in eyes with IOI + vasculitis + occlusion). Of the 8 cases, 5 experienced their first IOI-related event within 3 months of the first brolucizumab injection (increasing to 7/8 within 6 months). Incidence of IOI in aflibercept-treated eyes was 1.1%, with at least moderate visual acuity loss in 0.14%., Conclusions: This analysis of IOI cases after brolucizumab injection identified signs of retinal vasculitis with or without retinal vascular occlusion and an associated risk of visual acuity loss. The findings will help physicians to evaluate the risks and benefits of brolucizumab treatment for nAMD., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and is the most common cause of blindness in developed countries. Despite antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy demonstrating improvements in visual and anatomical outcomes, unmet needs remain. Brolucizumab-dbll (ie, brolucizumab), a VEGF inhibitor for treatment of neovascular (wet) AMD and recently approved by the FDA for its treatment of wet AMD, attempts to mitigate treatment burden through less frequent injections. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of brolucizumab compared with aflibercept and ranibizumab, given similar costs per injection and the potential for longer dosing intervals based on phase 3 clinical trial data. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to model the treatment of wet AMD patients with brolucizumab vs aflibercept and vs ranibizumab over a lifetime time horizon (base case) and 5-year time horizon (scenario analysis). The Markov model consisted of 3 primary health states: on treatment, off treatment, and death. Markov substates (5 total) described visual acuity (VA) ranging from no vision impairment to blindness. These VA-based substates were defined by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) values measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Fixed-dosing regimens for each therapy were included in the model: dosing every 4 weeks (q4w) for the first 3 months followed by dosing q8w/q12w for brolucizumab, dosing q4w for the first 3 months followed by dosing q8w for aflibercept, and q4w for ranibizumab. RESULTS: In the base case, brolucizumab was less costly than aflibercept ($63,614 vs $72,189), and brolucizumab generated 0.0079 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than aflibercept (4.580 vs 4.572). Lower total costs with brolucizumab were driven by reduced drug costs ($56,432 vs $64,057), reduced administration costs ($6,013 vs $6,825), and reduced monitoring costs ($1,168 vs $1,306). When evaluating the cost-effectiveness of brolucizumab over a 5-year time horizon, brolucizumab was less costly than aflibercept ($44,644 vs $50,772) and generated an additional 0.0049 QALYs (2.953 vs 2.948). Additionally, brolucizumab was less costly than ranibizumab ($63,614 vs $128,163) and generated 0.0078 more QALYs than ranibizumab (4.580 vs 4.572) in the base case. Lower total costs with brolucizumab were driven by reduced drug costs ($56,432 vs $114,516), reduced administration costs ($6,013 vs $11,541), and reduced monitoring costs ($1,168 vs $2,107). When evaluating the cost-effectiveness of brolucizumab over a 5-year time horizon, brolucizumab was less costly than ranibizumab ($44,644 vs $89,665), and brolucizumab generated an additional 0.0046 QALYs (2.953 vs 2.948). CONCLUSIONS: Brolucizumab can be cost saving and cost-effective compared with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of wet AMD. DISCLOSURES : Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation provided funding to Xcenda for the cost-effectiveness analysis and preparation of this manuscript. Carlton is an employee of Xcenda. Agashivala is employed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Yu was an employee of Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation at the time of this study. Hassan reports personal fees from iOPEN, BVI/Visitrec, ArcticDx, Bayer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Broadspot, BMC, Katalyst Surgical, Alcon, Vitreq, Surgicube, personal Ocugenix, Regeneron, Allergan, Oculus Surgical, Novartis, Genentech, and Eyepoint, unrelated to this work. Wykoff reports personal fees from Corcept Therapeutics, DORC, EyePoint, Gyroscope, IVERIC Bio, Merck, Notal Vision, ONL Therapeutics, Oxurion, Palatin, PolyPhotonix, Takeda, Thea Open Innovation; grants from Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Aldeyra, Gemini Therapeutics, Graybug Vision, IONIS Pharmaceutical, LMRI, Mylan, Neurotech Pharmaceuticals, Outlook Pharmaceuticals, Samsung Bioepis, Senju, Taiwan Liposome Company, Xbrane BioPharma, Santen; and grants and personal fees from Adverum, Allergan, Apellis, Chengdu Kanghong Biotechnologies (KHB), Clearside Biomedical, Genentech, Kodiak Sciences, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Opthea, Recens Medical, Regenxbio, Roche, and Regeneron, unrelated to this work. This research was presented as a virtual poster at the AMCP 2020 Annual Meeting, April 2020.

Purpose: To report the 96-week outcomes from HAWK and HARRIER., Design: Phase 3, prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter studies comparing efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 3 mg (HAWK only) and 6 mg with aflibercept 2 mg in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Participants: Treatment-naïve eyes with nAMD were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg (n = 358), brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 360), aflibercept 2 mg (n = 360; HAWK) or 1:1 to brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 370), aflibercept 2 mg (n = 369; HARRIER)., Methods: After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab patients received every (q)-12-week (w) dosing, possibly adjusting to q8w dosing if disease activity was present at predefined disease activity assessment (DAA) visits. Aflibercept was dosed in a fixed q8w regimen. Visual and anatomic parameters were assessed throughout. Primary end point was at week 48 (48w), confirmed at 96w., Main Outcome Measures: Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline, proportion of patients on an q12w regimen, retinal thickness, retinal fluid changes, and safety, all to 96w., Results: Mean change (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error) in BCVA from baseline to 96w in HAWK was 5.6±0.79 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters for brolucizumab 3 mg, 5.90±0.78 letters for brolucizumab 6 mg, and 5.3±0.78 letters for aflibercept and in HARRIER was 6.1±0.73 letters for brolucizumab 6 mg and 6.6 ± 0.73 letters for aflibercept. Greater central subfield thickness reductions were observed with brolucizumab 6 mg versus aflibercept in HAWK (LS mean, -174.8 μm vs. -148.7 μm; 95% confidence interval for treatment difference, -46.2 to -5.9 μm; P = 0.0115) and HARRIER (LS mean, -197.7 μm vs. -155.1 μm; 95% confidence interval for treatment difference, -62.0 to -23.3 μm; P < 0.0001). The proportions of eyes with intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) at 96w in HAWK were 31% (P = 0.0688) and 24% (P = 0.0002) for brolucizumab 3 mg and 6 mg and 37% for aflibercept, whereas in HARRIER, they were 24% for brolucizumab 6 mg (P < 0.0001) and 39% for aflibercept. At 92w (last DAA), a 45.4% and 38.6% probability was observed for brolucizumab 6 mg patients of maintaining an q12w treatment regimen in HAWK and HARRIER, respectively. Brolucizumab exhibited an overall well-tolerated safety profile., Conclusions: Visual outcomes from 48w to 96w confirm the efficacy achieved at 48w. Brolucizumab demonstrated greater fluid resolution compared with aflibercept. The q12w potential for brolucizumab observed at 48w was maintained to 96w., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim : To compare the treatment effect of brolucizumab, a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapeutic, with a putative placebo in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration. Materials and Methods : Clinical treatment-effect data from patients receiving brolucizumab 6 mg in the HAWK and HARRIER studies were compared with modelled placebo data using a previously developed and validated indirect response, non-linear, mixed effects model describing the natural visual acuity decline in wet age-related macular degeneration. The placebo model incorporated patient-level data from the sham injection arms of the MARINA and PIER studies, corrected for baseline best corrected visual acuity and age difference between these studies and the HAWK and HARRIER studies. Results : Compared with a modelled placebo, brolucizumab treatment was associated with an overall best corrected visual acuity gain of approximately 22 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at Week 48 and 28 letters at Week 96. Conclusions : As anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is now a standard of care for wet age-related macular degeneration, it is not feasible to conduct placebo-controlled trials for new wet age-related macular degeneration treatments. By allowing comparison with the natural decline in visual acuity without treatment, this analysis conveys the clinical importance of brolucizumab for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.

Improving or maintaining visual acuity is the main goal for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Current nAMD standard of care dictates frequent intravitreal (IVT) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, which places a substantial burden on patients, caregivers, and physicians. Brolucizumab, a newly developed anti-VEGF molecule for nAMD treatment, has demonstrated longer durability and improvement in visual and anatomic outcomes in clinical studies in a q12-week regimen, indicating its potential to reduce treatment burden as an important therapeutic tool in nAMD management. This review focuses on the development of brolucizumab and the preclinical and clinical studies evaluating its efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Brolucizumab (also known as "RTH258" and "ESBA1008") is a humanized, single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody with a molecular mass of approximately 26 kDa that inhibits VEGF-A. Preclinical studies show that brolucizumab readily penetrates the retina to reach the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid with minimal subsequent systemic exposure. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a single IVT brolucizumab administration in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD were first demonstrated in the SEE Phase 1/2 study. The OSPREY Phase 2 study showed brolucizumab to be as efficacious as aflibercept in a q8-week regimen with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and brolucizumab achieving greater fluid resolution. Brolucizumab-treated patients in the OSPREY study were subsequently challenged with a q12-week dosing interval, and the outcomes provided key information for the study design and end points of the Phase 3 studies. In the HAWK and HARRIER Phase 3 studies, after 3 monthly loading injections, brolucizumab treatment regimen (q12-week or q8-week) was guided by individual disease activity assessment using functional and anatomic parameters (central subfield thickness [CST], intraretinal fluid [IRF], or subretinal fluid [SRF]) versus aflibercept (q8-week). Fewer brolucizumab 6-mg treated eyes had disease activity versus aflibercept, and anatomic outcome results at weeks 16 and 48 demonstrate brolucizumab as a potent drying agent. Moreover, of patients treated with 6 mg brolucizumab, 55.6% and 51.0% maintained a q12-week dosing interval immediately after the loading phase until week 48 in HAWK and HARRIER, respectively. These Phase 3 studies demonstrated that the brolucizumab q12-week regimen maintains efficacy and safety while reducing treatment burden associated with regular IVT injections for patients with nAMD., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials (HAWK and HARRIER) compared brolucizumab, a single-chain antibody fragment that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-A, with aflibercept to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: Double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized trials., Participants: Patients (N = 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye., Intervention: Patients were randomized to intravitreal brolucizumab 3 mg (HAWK only) or 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. After loading with 3 monthly injections, brolucizumab-treated eyes received an injection every 12 weeks (q12w) and were interval adjusted to every 8 weeks (q8w) if disease activity was present; aflibercept-treated eyes received q8w dosing., Main Outcome Measures: The primary hypothesis was noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to Week 48 (margin: 4 letters). Other key end points included the percentage of patients who maintained q12w dosing through Week 48 and anatomic outcomes., Results: At Week 48, each brolucizumab arm demonstrated noninferiority to aflibercept in BCVA change from baseline (least squares [LS] mean, +6.6 [6 mg] and +6.1 [3 mg] letters with brolucizumab vs. +6.8 letters with aflibercept [HAWK]; +6.9 [brolucizumab 6 mg] vs. +7.6 [aflibercept] letters [HARRIER]; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Greater than 50% of brolucizumab 6 mg-treated eyes were maintained on q12w dosing through Week 48 (56% [HAWK] and 51% [HARRIER]). At Week 16, after identical treatment exposure, fewer brolucizumab 6 mg-treated eyes had disease activity versus aflibercept in HAWK (24.0% vs. 34.5%; P = 0.001) and HARRIER (22.7% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.002). Greater central subfield thickness reductions from baseline to Week 48 were observed with brolucizumab 6 mg versus aflibercept in HAWK (LS mean -172.8 μm vs. -143.7 μm; P = 0.001) and HARRIER (LS mean -193.8 μm vs. -143.9 μm; P < 0.001). Anatomic retinal fluid outcomes favored brolucizumab over aflibercept. Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar with brolucizumab and aflibercept., Conclusions: Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in visual function at Week 48, and >50% of brolucizumab 6 mg-treated eyes were maintained on q12w dosing interval through Week 48. Anatomic outcomes favored brolucizumab over aflibercept. Overall safety with brolucizumab was similar to aflibercept (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02307682, NCT02434328)., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To characterise the presence of a hyperautofluorescent (HAF) ring associated with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) complex in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: Fundus autofluorescence images and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from 362 eyes with wet AMD were reviewed. The presence and size of an HAF ring associated with the CNV complex was evaluated. A subgroup of 64 treatment-naive eyes with new-onset CNV was studied to analyse the relationship between pretreatment OCT characteristics and the presence of the HAF ring., Results: An HAF ring was present in 38% of the entire cohort of eyes and in 39% of treatment-naive eyes. The presence of the HAF ring was significantly correlated with the extent of baseline subretinal fluid (SRF) on OCT (p=0.0113), the number of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (p=0.0439) and the number of treatment cycles (p=0.0154). Eyes with an HAF ring were more likely to have disruption of the ellipsoid zone line once the SRF was resolved compared with eyes without an HAF ring (p=0.0002). In multivariate analysis, the best predictors for HAF ring were the baseline area of SRF (p=0.0449) and the number of anti-VEGF treatments received (p=0.0568)., Conclusions: Nearly 40% of wet AMD eyes had an HAF ring. In treatment-naive eyes, the HAF ring had a significant association with SRF and was found as early as the baseline measurement and as long as 18 months after beginning treatment, persisting for up to 6 years after the initial diagnosis. Its association with baseline SRF and disruption of the ellipsoid zone line of the photoreceptors on OCT could indicate continuous stress on the outer retinal structures after exposure to prolonged SRF and/or transmitted autofluorescence from loss of the photoreceptors overlying the retinal pigment epithelium., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Purpose: To assess change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) receiving intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or ranibizumab in VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) 1 and 2 studies., Design: Analyses from 2 randomized, active-controlled, phase III trials., Participants: A total of 2457 patients with NVAMD., Methods: Patients received IAI 2 mg every (q) 4 weeks (2q4), 0.5 mg q4 weeks (0.5q4), 2 mg q8 weeks (after 3 monthly doses; 2q8), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg q4 weeks (Rq4) for 52 weeks. At week 52, patients were switched to a variable regimen requiring at least quarterly dosing and allowing interim injections based on anatomic and visual assessment., Main Outcome Measures: Pre-injection IOP was analyzed in study and uninjected fellow eyes from baseline to week 96. Prespecified end points included mean change in IOP from baseline and prevalence of a >21 mmHg and >10 mmHg increase in IOP from baseline. Cumulative incidence of sustained (at 2 consecutive visits) IOP >21 mmHg, a single event of IOP >25 mmHg, and sustained IOP increase from baseline (≥5 mmHg) was also evaluated., Results: Mean IOP change from baseline over 96 weeks in all IAI groups was consistently lower than in the Rq4 group, and this finding was replicated in both trials. In an analysis integrating both studies, the proportion of study eyes with IOP >21 mmHg at week 96 was 20.2%, 14.2%, 12.1%, and 12.5% in Rq4, 2q4, 2q8, and 0.5q4, respectively. Reduction in risk, relative to Rq4, of having sustained IOP >21 mmHg over 96 weeks was 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-78%), 50% (95% CI, 19%-70%), and 69% (95% CI, 45%-84%) for 2q4, 2q8, and 0.5q4, respectively. Risk reduction in the IAI groups for a sustained IOP increase ≥5 mmHg was 31% (95% CI, 8%-48%), 38% (95% CI, 17%-54%), and 47% (95% CI, 27%-61%), respectively. In uninjected fellow eyes, only sustained IOP >21 mmHg events were higher in the Rq4 group compared with all IAI groups., Conclusions: Incidence of elevated IOP in eyes with NVAMD was lower in all IAI groups than in the ranibizumab group., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)