Search

With the introduction of the complement C5-inhibitor eculizumab, a new era was entered for patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Eculizumab therapy very effectively reversed thrombotic microangiopathy and reduced mortality and morbidity. Initial guidelines suggested lifelong treatment and recommended prophylactic use of eculizumab in aHUS patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, there is little evidence to support lifelong therapy or prophylactic treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Worldwide, there is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal dose and duration of treatment, particularly in view of the high costs and potential side effects of eculizumab. An increasing but still limited number of case reports and small cohort studies suggest that a restrictive treatment regimen is feasible. We review the current literature and focus on the safety and efficacy of restrictive use of eculizumab. Our current treatment protocol is based on restrictive use of eculizumab. Prospective monitoring will provide more definite proof of the feasibility of such restrictive treatment.

Eculizumab is the first drug approved for the treatment of complement-mediated diseases, and current dosage schedules result in large interindividual drug concentrations. This review provides insight into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of eculizumab, both for reported on-label (paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia gravis) and off-label (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy) indications. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize treatment and reduce costs.

Background: Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but severe form of thrombotic microangiopathy as a consequence of complement dysregulation. aHUS has a poor outcome with high mortality and >50% of patients developing end-stage renal disease. Since the end of 2012, these outcomes have greatly improved with the introduction of eculizumab. Currently the duration of treatment is debated. Most guidelines advise lifelong treatment. However, there is no hard evidence to support this advice. Historically, a substantial number of aHUS patients were weaned of plasma therapy, often without disease recurrence. Moreover, the long-term consequences of eculizumab treatment are unknown. In this retrospective study we describe 20 patients who received a restrictive treatment regimen., Methods: All aHUS patients who presented in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2012 and 2016 and who received eculizumab are described. Clinical, diagnostic and follow-up data were gathered and reviewed., Results: Twenty patients (14 adults, 6 children) with aHUS have received eculizumab. Eculizumab was tapered in all and stopped in 17 patients. aHUS recurrence occurred in five patients. Due to close monitoring, recurrence was detected early and eculizumab was restarted. No clinical sequela such as proteinuria or progressive kidney dysfunction was detected subsequently. In total, eculizumab has been discontinued in 13 patients without aHUS recurrence, of which 5 are event free for >1 year. With this strategy ∼€11.4 million have been saved., Conclusions: A restrictive eculizumab regimen in aHUS appears safe and effective. Prospective studies should further evaluate the most optimal treatment strategy.