Search

Background: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy for the treatment of solid and haematologic malignancies has shown poor response rates as a monotherapy. Furthermore, its use is limited to tumours expressing certain molecular targets. It has been shown that single-dose radiation can induce immunogenic modulation that is characterised by cell-surface phenotypic changes leading to augmented tumour cell/cytotoxic T-cell interaction., Methods: We examined radiation's ability to upregulate mAb therapy targets. We also used radiation to sensitise tumour cells to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC)., Results: Radiation significantly increased cell-surface and total protein expression of mAb targets HER2, EGFR, and CD20. Focusing on HER2, targeted by trastuzumab, we observed significant upregulation of HER2 following radiation of 3 out of 3 breast cancer cell lines, one of which was triple negative, as well as in residential stem-cell populations. HER2 upregulation was sustained up to 96 h following radiation exposure and was largely dependent on intracellular reactive oxygen species. Improved ADCC and sensitisation to the antiproliferative effects of trastuzumab demonstrated the functional significance of radiation-induced HER2 upregulation., Conclusions: We show that single-dose radiation enhances mAb therapy. These findings highlight a mechanism for combining radiation with immunotherapy and expand the patient population that can be treated with targeted therapy.

Ofatumumab (OFA), a human CD20-targeting mAb, kills B lymphocytes using the innate immune system including complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). The efficacy of OFA in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is limited by drug resistance, which is not well characterized. To better understand mechanisms of resistance, we prospectively studied CLL cells isolated from blood samples collected before and after in vivo exposure to the initial dose of OFA therapy in 25 patients undergoing their first treatment for progressive CLL. As previously reported, OFA therapy rapidly decreased the absolute lymphocyte count, CD20 expression by CLL cells, and serum complement levels. We now show that after administration of the first dose of OFA, there was a modest rebound in the absolute lymphocyte count and serum complement levels, but substantial ongoing loss of CD20 expression by CLL cells. These post-OFA treatment CLL cells were highly resistant to OFA-mediated CDC but retained sensitivity to alemtuzumab-mediated CDC in vitro. Posttherapy serum OFA levels correlated inversely with both the amount of pretreatment circulating cell-bound CD20 and with the decrease in this value following treatment. In vitro OFA-mediated CDC did not predict clinical responses, and the patients with first-dose reactions to OFA did not have markers of increased complement activation in vivo. We propose that optimal efficacy of CD20- targeted therapy for CLL requires determining an mAb dose size and frequency that optimizes CLL killing without exceeding the capacity of the cytotoxic mechanisms and thus minimizes loss of CD20 expression in the surviving CLL cells.

Activation of the complement system by tumor cells was long believed to only benefit the host. Overexpression of complement inhibitors by many tumor cell types and results obtained in several experimental animal models were all in agreement with this hypothesis. However, recent reports imply that the situation is more complex than initially believed and that under certain circumstances tumor cells may use complement to their own advantage, e.g. by recruitment of suppressor T cells or promoting local angiogenesis. Such a dual role of complement may also be apparent when considering the effect of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) used to successfully treat B cell malignancies, such as CD20 mAbs. Some argue that besides direct tumor cell killing by mAbs, two main immune effector mechanisms, complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), may be competing with each other. Experiments aiming at answering the question whether complement is our friend or foe in mAb therapy ended up with seemingly contradictory conclusions. Herein, we revisit the existing knowledge on this pivotal issue based on rituximab and other anti-CD20 mAb as a model of therapeutic agents., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are successfully used in the management of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We have reported previously that statins induce conformational changes in CD20 molecules and impair rituximab-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Here we investigated in more detail the influence of farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) on CD20 expression and antitumor activity of anti-CD20 mAbs. Among all FTIs studied, L-744,832 had the most significant influence on CD20 levels. It significantly increased rituximab-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity against primary tumor cells isolated from patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas or chronic lymphocytic leukemia and increased CD20 expression in the majority of primary lymphoma/leukemia cells. Incubation of Raji cells with L-744,832 led to up-regulation of CD20 at mRNA and protein levels. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that inhibition of farnesyltransferase activity was associated with increased binding of PU.1 and Oct-2 to the CD20 promoter sequences. These studies indicate that CD20 expression can be modulated by FTIs. The combination of FTIs with anti-CD20 mAbs is a promising therapeutic approach, and its efficacy should be examined in patients with B-cell tumors.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a destructive inflammatory joint disorder. Pre- and mature B-cells, characterized by CD20 antigen expression, play an important role in the inflammatory process. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen, has been approved since 2006 for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, not all patients benefit from this treatment. Persistent activity of the disease has been reported despite treatment with rituximab. Imaging of radiolabeled rituximab can be used to monitor the biodistribution of rituximab, and potentially to predict the efficacy of the treatment. In this study, rituximab was radiolabeled with ¹²⁴Iodine for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of ¹²⁴I-rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, to establish the optimal procedure for PET imaging. Eligible patients received 50 MBq ¹²⁴I-rituximab, corresponding to approximately 1.5 mg rituximab. Wholebody PET/CT imaging was performed at 10 min, 24 hrs, and 48 hrs post injection. The total body activity, radioactivity in whole blood, and rituximab serum levels were determined. ¹²⁴I-rituximab has favorable pharmacokinetics for targeting of (pathological) B cells and imaging over several days, but only after pre-treatment with unlabeled rituximab. In addition, protection of the thyroid is recommended to prevent uptake of released ¹²⁴I.

Introduction: Visualization of the CD20-antigen expression could provide a tool to localize sites of inflammation and could be of additive value in the diagnosis, and subsequently, in the treatment follow-up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab (Mabthera®), was radiolabeled with ¹²⁴Iodine. We report the first results of I¹²⁴-rituximab PET/CT in patients with rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: Eligible patients received 50 MBq ¹²⁴I-rituximab. Wholebody PET/CT imaging was performed at 10 min, 24 h, 48 h and 72-96 h post injection. Images were evaluated primarily on a visual basis and were correlated with disease activity as determined by physical examination and clinical measures., Results: Joints with visually detectable targeting of ¹²⁴I-rituximab were observed in 4 out of 5 evaluable patients. Only the images at 24 h and later showed accumulation in joints, indicating that the visualized signal represented active targeting of rituximab to the CD20 antigen. Several images showed CD20 positive B-cell infiltration in joints which were clinically normal, while a few clinically diagnosed arthritis localizations were not visualized. This discrepancy suggests that infiltration of CD20 positive B-cells in synovium is a phenomenon that is at least partially independent of clinical inflammation. The level of uptake in joints was generally low, representing less than 0.5% of the injected dose., Conclusion: We have shown the feasibility of CD20 antigen imaging using ¹²⁴I-rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Further research is needed to elucidate the clinical significance of demonstrated B-cell infiltration in rheumatic joints.

Purpose: To report the pharmacokinetics of ¹³¹I-rituximab a patient with a CD20 positive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma who has received ¹³¹I-rituximab as consolidation treatment after remission induction and to evaluate the effect of radioiodination on the biological properties of rituximab., Results: The patient was a 65-year-old male with a relapsed CD20 positive follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. After induction therapy the patient was in partial remission. Following administration of a diagnostic dose of 185 MBq ¹³¹I-rituximab, remaining lesions were identified on the wholebody scans. The patient then received a therapeutic dose of 1000 MBq ¹³¹I-rituximab. The uptake by the tumor in the right axilla was 0.17-0.21% of the injected dose. The calculated biological half-life of ¹³¹I-rituximab was 684 hrs. This biological half-life corresponded well with the half-life of unlabeled rituximab which was approximately 720 hrs., Discussion and Conclusion: Even though radioiodination of rituximab results in a reduced binding capacity, whole body scans demonstrated localization of ¹³¹I-rituximab in the tumor area. This observation supports the specific targeting of ¹³¹I-rituximab. The half-life of ¹³¹I-rituximab corresponded to the half-life of unlabeled rituximab. Hence, the pharmacokinetics of ¹³¹ I-rituximab was not relevantly affected by the radioiodination process.

Rituximab maintenance therapy provides a significant benefit in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Based on its efficacy in improving response to chemotherapy, the anti-CD20 antibody is currently under evaluation as maintenance therapy also in patients with B-CLL. We evaluated rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity in 10 B-CLL cases pretreated in vitro with non-cytotoxic concentrations of fludarabine. This combination induced a synergic cytotoxic effect in 8 out of 10 patients at a mean level of 26.15 +/- 13.9%, compared to 8.05 +/- 5.3% cytotoxicity observed with rituximab alone. Consistent with the viability assay, we found an increased caspase-3 activity together with activation of caspase-9 in B-CLL cells sensitive to sequential non-cytotoxic fludarabine and rituximab exposure. Non-cytotoxic fludarabine concentrations may sensitize B-CLL cells to rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity via caspase-3 activation.

The aim of adoptive T-cell therapy of cancer is to selectively confer immunity against tumor cells. Autoimmune side effects, however, remain a risk, emphasizing the relevance of a suicide mechanism allowing in vivo elimination of infused T cells. We investigated the use of human CD20 as suicide gene in T-lymphocytes. Potential effects of forced CD20 expression on T-cell function were investigated by comparing CD20- and mock-transduced cytomegalovirus (CMV) specific T cells for cytolysis, cytokine release and proliferation. The use of CD20 as suicide gene was investigated in CMV specific T cells and in T cells genetically modified with an antigen specific T-cell receptor. No effect of CD20 on T-cell function was observed. CD20-transduced T cells with and without co-transferred T-cell receptor were efficiently eliminated by complement dependent cytotoxicity induced by therapeutic anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. The data support the broad value of CD20 as safety switch in adoptive T-cell therapy.

Peptide mimotopes of the CD20 epitope recognized by rituximab are useful tools for studying this therapeutic mAb's functional properties. We previously identified two structurally different peptides that are both effective mimotopes: a 7-mer cyclic peptide (Rp15-C) bearing the antigenic motif (a/sNPS) that matches 170(ANPS)173 of the extracellular loop of CD20, and a 12-mer linear peptide (Rp5-L) containing the antigenic motif (WPxWLE) lacking sequence homology to CD20. In this study, we investigated whether the different structures of Rp15-C and Rp5-L reflect the mimicry of the same or different CD20 epitopes recognized by rituximab. Using immunochemical methods, we found that, like Rp15-C, Rp5-L mimics the raft-associated form of CD20 (by inhibiting rituximab binding to CD20 in vitro). Rp5-L and Rp15-C elicit, in immunized mice, anti-CD20 Abs that stain CD20+ cells with a punctate pattern similar to that of rituximab. However, only anti-Rp5-L Abs recognize denatured CD20. When phage-display peptide libraries were panned with anti-Rp5-L, phage clones were enriched that expressed the consensus qWPxwL, similar to the antigenic motif (WPxWLE), but not matching (a/sNPS). Finally, (WPxWLE) and (ANPS) share some, but not all, contact sites within the rituximab Ag-combining site, indicating that (WPxWLE) is not an exact replica of Rp15-C (or CD20) (ANPS). Altogether, these results indicate that the two structurally different peptides are also conformationally different, and suggest that rituximab recognizes two different CD20-associated epitopes.

CD20 is expressed in approximately one- half of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases with B-cell precursor (BCP) origin. We observed that it is occasionally up-regulated during treatment. To understand the impact of this on the potential effectiveness of anti-CD20 immunotherapy, we studied 237 CD10(+) pediatric BCP-ALL patients with Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM)-type therapy. We analyzed CD20 expression changes from diagnosis to end-induction, focusing on sample pairs with more than or equal to 0.1% residual leukemic blasts, and assessed complement-induced cytotoxicity by CD20-targeting with rituximab in vitro. CD20-positivity significantly increased from 45% in initial samples to 81% at end-induction (day 15, 71%). The levels of expression also increased; 52% of cases at end-induction had at least 90% CD20(pos) leukemic cells, as opposed to 5% at diagnosis (day 15, 20%). CD20 up-regulation was frequent in high-risk patients, patients with high minimal residual disease at end-induction, and patients who suffered later from relapse, but not in TEL/AML1 cases. Notably, up-regulation occurred in viable cells sustaining chemotherapy. In vitro, CD20 up-regulation significantly enhanced rituximab cytotoxicity and could be elicited on prednisolone incubation. In conclusion, CD20 up-regulation is frequently induced in BCP-ALL during induction, and this translates into an acquired state of higher sensitivity to rituximab. This study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00430118.

Here we describe two cases of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with monoclonal immunoglobulins (Igs). The first case was a 77-year-old man with primary lymphoma of the lung. Immunoelectrophoresis detected IgM-kappa in serum and kappa light chain excretion into urine. Three months after treatment with single-agent rituximab, a large amount of pleural fluid was found to have accumulated. The fluid contained CD5(-), CD10(-), CD19(+), CD38(+) and CD138(-/+) lymphoma cells with lymphoplasmacytoid appearance. Although a small fraction of the cells were CD20(+), the majority of the lymphoma cells were negative and expressed surface-membrane IgM-kappa at low levels. The cells possessed a karyotype of 46, XY, t(11;18)(q21;q21). The second case was a 55-year-old man who underwent total gastrectomy due to gastric perforation. Surgical specimens demonstrated the histopathological features of MALT lymphoma associated with plasma cell differentiation. The lymphoma cells had a 46, XY, t(11;18)(q21;q21) karyotype. Monoclonal Igs detected were serum IgA (M)-kappa and urinary kappa light chain. The patient was subsequently treated with six cycles of R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone) ; however, serum monoclonal Ig levels were not affected. The lymphoma cells in both cases may have contained two populations, a rituximab-sensitive CD20(+) population and a rituximab-resistant population that had differentiated into the Ig-secreting plasma cell stage.

Purpose: The treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and its subset, primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL), remains of limited efficiency, and salvage therapies are often used without prior testing in adequate animal models. Most PNCSL/PIOL are aggressive B-cell malignancies. Two animal models that closely mimic the human situation were established to evaluate the efficiency of intravitreal and intracerebral anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) injections., Methods: Human CD20-transfected murine B-lymphoma cells (38C13 CD20(+)) were inoculated in the vitreous through the pars plana or in the caudate nucleus with the use of a stereotaxic frame in immunocompetent syngeneic mice. Animals were monitored clinically and by funduscopic and histologic examination. Rituximab was injected intravitreally or intracerebrally. Occurrences of exophthalmia, neurologic disturbance, and weight loss were monitored over 2 months., Results: Inoculation of 38C13 CD20(+) cells in the eye or the brain resulted in tumor occurrence after a median of 15 days or 22 days, respectively, with histologic characteristics closely resembling those of PIOL and PCNSL. Local rituximab injections eradicated tumor colonization in more than half the graft recipients and inhibited tumor progression significantly in the others compared with progression in mice that underwent grafting with the control 38C13 cell line (no human CD20 expression) and in mice that underwent grafting with 38C13 CD20(+) cells that received local injections of an irrelevant antibody (trastuzumab)., Conclusions: Inoculation of native or human CD20-transfected murine 38C13 cells in the vitreous or the brain of immunocompetent mice provides useful novel models for evaluating the biology and treatment of PIOL and PCNSL. Intravitreal and intracerebral rituximab injections reduced tumor occurrence and growth in each model.

The chimeric monoclonal antibody rituximab is the standard of care for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Rituximab mediates complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of CD20-positive human B cells. In addition, rituximab sensitizes B-NHL cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy and has direct apoptotic and antiproliferative effects. Whereas expression of the CD20 antigen is a natural prerequisite for rituximab sensitivity, cell-autonomous factors determining the response of B-NHL to rituximab are less defined. To this end, we have studied rituximab-induced apoptosis in human B-NHL models. We find that rituximab directly triggers apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway of caspase activation. Expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-xL confers resistance against rituximab-induced apoptosis in vitro and rituximab treatment of xenografted B-NHL in vivo. B-NHL cells insensitive to rituximab-induced apoptosis exhibit increased endogenous expression of multiple antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, or activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling resulting in up-regulation of Mcl-1. The former resistance pattern is overcome by treatment with the BH3-mimetic ABT-737, the latter by combining rituximab with pharmacologic phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitors. In conclusion, sensitivity of B-NHL cells to rituximab-induced apoptosis is determined at the level of mitochondria. Pharmacologic modulation of Bcl-2 family proteins or their upstream regulators is a promising strategy to overcome rituximab resistance.

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been less successful in treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) than lymphoma, possibly due to the lower density of CD20 on B lymphocytes from CLL patients than on those from lymphoma patients. This lowering may result from insufficiency of one of the transcription factors of cd20. Of these, purine-rich box-1 (PU.1) is poorly expressed in CLL. To estimate its weight in CD20 expression, pu.1 cDNA was transfected into CLL B cells and shown to raise the membrane expression of CD20 and to improve the rituximab-induced lysis of transfected cells. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and all-trans-retinoic acids were not involved in the defective expression of PU.1 or the excessive methylation of the pu.1 gene, because 6 of 14 CLL samples tested were normally methylated. This was confirmed by the failure of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors to restore pu.1 transcription in hypermethylated CLL, and, in fact, the expression of PU.1 was down-regulated by excessive expression of the FMS proto-oncogene-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3) receptor. This abnormality is consistent with our finding of elevated levels of Flt3 ligand (FL) in 20 of 23 CLL sera tested. We propose that FL-dependent increased Flt3 signaling prevents the expression of PU.1, which down-regulates that of CD20, and accounts for resistance of leukemic B cells to rituximab-induced lysis.

Purpose: The use of targeted radiation therapy (RT) in conjunction with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) delivers high clinical response rates in B-cell lymphomas as part of radioimmunotherapy. The mechanisms underlying these impressive responses, particularly in patients whose lymphomas have become refractory to chemotherapy, are poorly understood., Experimental Design: In this study, we have investigated the signaling pathways and mode of cell death induced in B-cell lymphoma cells after the combination of RT and either type I (rituximab) or type II (tositumomab/B1) anti-CD20 mAb., Results: Increased tumor cell death was observed when RT was combined with tositumomab, but not rituximab. This additive cell death was found to be mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent and could be reversed with mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors, as well as small interfering RNA targeting MEK1/2. Furthermore, we found that this increased death was associated with ERK1/2 nuclear accumulation after tositumomab treatment, which was enhanced in combination with RT. Importantly, although Bcl-2 overexpression resulted in resistance to RT-induced apoptosis, it had no effect on the tumor cell death induced by tositumomab plus RT, indicating a nonapoptotic form of cell death., Conclusions: These findings indicate that RT and type II anti-CD20 mAb combine to stimulate a prodeath function of the MEK-ERK1/2 pathway, which is able to overcome apoptotic resistance potentially explaining the efficacy of this modality in treating patients with chemoresistant disease.

The present patient was diagnosed as having human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8)/Kaposi sarcoma herpes virus (KSHV)-negative and CD20-positive primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) of the right-sided pleural effusion. After pleural drainage, malignant cells disappeared spontaneously in a small amount of the remaining pleural effusion without chemotherapy. The patient was treated with six cycles of chemotherapy consisting of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone. He has been in complete remission for more than 22 months. It is suggested that effusion drainage followed by chemotherapy containing rituximab is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HHV-8/KSHV-negative and CD20-positive PEL.

The B-cell depleting anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has become a therapeutic alternative in renal transplantation. However, understanding of the pharmacodynamics is limited. We have therefore studied the effect of single-dose rituximab, in combination with conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy, on the B-cell population in peripheral blood as well as in tissues, in kidney transplant recipients. Forty-nine kidney recipients received single-dose rituximab. The prevalence of B cells was assessed in peripheral blood, kidney transplant tissue, and in lymph nodes. In 88%, complete depletion of B cells in peripheral blood was observed and, 15 months after treatment, B cells were still undetectable in the majority of patients. In kidney tissue, B cells were also completely eliminated. In contrast, the B cells were not eliminated in lymph nodes, although a reduction was observed. In conclusion, single-dose rituximab in kidney transplant recipients evokes a long-term elimination of B-cells in peripheral blood as well as within the kidney transplant.

Purpose: PF-3512676 (formerly CpG 7909) is a novel Toll-like receptor 9-activating oligonucleotide with single-agent antitumor activity that augments preclinical rituximab efficacy. This Phase I trial was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab., Experimental Design: Patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received i.v. rituximab (375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) and PF-3512676 weekly for 4 weeks either i.v. (0.04, 0.16, 0.32, or 0.48 mg/kg) or s.c. (0.01, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.16 mg/kg). An additional extended-treatment cohort received 4 weeks of 0.24 mg/kg s.c. PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab followed by s.c. PF-3512676 alone weekly for 20 weeks., Results: Patients (N = 50) had received a median of three prior therapies (range, 1-11) including rituximab in 80% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 of 19 (58%) i.v. patients, 15 of 19 (79%) s.c. patients, and all 12 patients in the extended-treatment cohort. Most common adverse events were mild to moderate systemic flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions (s.c. cohorts only). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients. Objective responses occurred in 12 of 50 (24%) patients overall and in 6 of 12 (50%) patients in the extended-treatment cohort, including 2 patients with rituximab-refractory disease., Conclusion: Brief or extended-duration PF-3512676 can be safely administered in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Background: Intrarenal B cell clusters are associated with poor clinical outcome in acute interstitial rejection. The incidence of B cell aggregates in vascular rejection and the effect of therapy with the monoclonal CD20 antibody rituximab on intrarenal B cells are currently unclear., Methods: We analyzed the incidence of B cell clusters in patients with vascular rejection by immunohistochemistry and compared the influence of rituximab treatment plus conventional therapy with that of conventional immunosuppression alone on intrarenal B cells. Furthermore intrarenal expression of the B cell attracting chemokine BCA-1/CXCL13 and the lymphoid chemokine SLC/CCL21 were analyzed., Results: Nine of 16 patients with vascular rejection displayed intrarenal B cell clusters strictly co-localizing with expression of the B cell attractant chemokine BCA-1/CXCL13. Addition of rituximab to conventional treatment lead to complete depletion of intrarenal B cells (98.3+/-136.4 CD20, 90.7+/-113.2 CD19 vs. 0+/-0 CD20, 0+/-0 CD19 B cells/hpf, P<0.001). Creatinine decreased from 5.0+/-4.1 to 1.9+/-0.4 mg/dl at discharge, and to 1.9+/-0.5 mg/dl after three months (P<0.02). No effect on intrarenal B cells was observed in the patients not treated with rituximab (72.8+/-73.0 vs. 80.3+/-75.3 CD20, 75.6+/-86.6 vs. 85.7+/-82.0 CD19). At discharge, creatinine had improved in this group from 5.1+/-4.1 mg/dl to 1.8+/-0.5 mg/dl and to 1.7+/-0.6 mg/dl after 3 months (P<0.05)., Conclusion: In summary, our study reports two main findings, namely the previously unrecognized high prevalence of intrarenal B cell clusters in 56% of biopsies with acute vascular rejection and a complete depletion of intrarenal B cells by addition of Rituximab to conventional treatment.

Rituximab is effective in about one half of patients with indolent lymphoma. Even these patients relapse and develop rituximab resistance. To increase potency and circumvent resistance, the anti-lymphoma effects of rituximab, an anti-CD20 MAb(1), combined with chLym-1(2), an anti-HLA-DR MAb, were assessed in human lymphoma cell lines by examining growth inhibition and cell death, apoptosis induction, ADCC(3) and CDC(4). There were additive effects in all assays and synergism in cell lines, such as B35M, which displayed resistance to either MAb alone. In B35M cells, combined rituximab and chLym-1 induced a 27-fold direct reduction in viable cells, whereas equivalent concentrations of rituximab or chLym-1 alone induced only a 1-fold and 10-fold reduction in viable cells, respectively. Because these results occurred at MAb concentrations readily achievable in patients, they suggest that this combination immunotherapy regimen may increase the potency and range of effectiveness of these MAbs in lymphoma patients.

Immunotherapy with rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan), alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, has significantly improved the treatment outcome of lymphoma patients. Via an elusive mechanism, a subpopulation of patients becomes unresponsive and/or relapses. To recapitulate various aspects of acquired resistance, rituximab-resistant (RR) clones were established from lymphoma lines and compared with parental cells. Surface CD20 expression was diminished in the clones. The clones neither responded to rituximab-mediated growth reduction or complement-dependent cytotoxicity nor underwent apoptosis in response to cross-linked rituximab. Rituximab failed to chemosensitize the RR clones, which exhibited constitutive hyperactivation of the nuclear factor-kappaB and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathways, leading to overexpression of B-cell lymphoma protein 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-related gene (long alternatively spliced variant of Bcl-x gene), and myeloid cell differentiation 1 and higher drug resistance. Unlike parental cells, rituximab neither inhibited the activity of these pathways nor diminished the expression of resistant factors. Pharmacologic inhibitors of the survival pathways or Bcl-2 family members reduced the activity of these pathways, diminished antiapoptotic protein expression, and chemosensitized the RR clones. These novel in vitro results denote that continuous long-term rituximab exposure culminates in RR clones that do not respond to rituximab-mediated effects, have altered cellular signaling dynamics, and exhibit different genetic and phenotypic properties compared with parental cells. The data also reveal that although RR clones exhibit higher resistance to rituximab and cytotoxic drugs, these clones can be chemosensitized following treatment with pharmacologic inhibitors (e.g., dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin, bortezomib, PD098059) that target survival/antiapoptotic pathways. The findings also identify intracellular targets for potential molecular therapeutic intervention to increase treatment efficacy. The significance and potential clinical relevance of the findings are discussed.

We report the first case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the stomach displaying CD20-negative relapse after rituximab-containing treatment and the re-appearance of CD20 expression at the second failure. The loss of CD20 expression in B-cell lymphomas relapsing after rituximab is a well-known phenomenon, but its actual impact in DLBCL is difficult to estimate. This paradigmatic case suggests that CD20-expression reappearance after purging of CD20-positive clones with rituximab might be an underestimated occurrence in B-cell lymphomas. Accordingly, every relapse, whenever possible, should be histologically assessed with diagnostic and immunophenotyping purposes.

Immunohistochemistry using the L26 antibody recognizes an intracellular domain of CD20, whereas the L27 antibody used for surface CD20 staining by flow cytometry (FC) recognizes an extracellular domain and would be expected to be a better predictor of response to rituximab. We present a 75-year-old man who was initially treated for CD20- diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on FC and, at relapse, still had CD20- disease by FC but CD20+ disease by immunohistochemistry. The patient responded to rituximab alone. On further study, it was shown that the malignant B cells, but not normal B cells, expressed the L27 surface binding site only within the intracellular domain. Therefore, it appears that the rituximab binding site is distinct from the surface binding site, and when there is a disparity between the methods to detect CD20 expression, consideration should be given to include rituximab in the treatment plan.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a haematological syndrome characterised by a dramatic onset requiring an urgent treatment with plasma exchange (PE). However, the prognosis is still dismal for PE related complications, a rate of failure and remarkable frequencies of relapse. TTP post transplantation is largely described as an outstanding, unusual complication of allogenic transplantation, but it is rarely mentioned after autologous transplantation. We describe a 62-year-old Caucasian patient who presented with TTP, accompanied by renal failure, after an autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. PE together with hemodialysis was rapidly initiated but without any benefit. Since empirical administration of Rituximab, anti CD20 monoclonal antibody,was reported to be effective, we administered four courses of Rituximab inducing a complete remission of TTP and subsequently of the renal failure. This response to Rituximab in TTP post transplantation is suggestive of a possible implication of B-lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of TTP and it paves the way for an investigational approach in this settings.

Novel monoclonal antibodies are currently being evaluated and have been shown to have significantly influenced the treatment of Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It is of the utmost importance to reduce treatment-related toxicity and, hopefully, improve the cure rate of lymphoma. This is possible by using novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, which target tumor cells while sparing normal cells. Investigational antibody therapies include those targeting malignant cells as well as those targeting the microenvironment. Continued investigation is encouraged to combine monoclonal antibodies with other targeted therapies and incorporate their use into standards of care in the treatment of lymphoma.

Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma remains a generally incurable malignancy. Administration of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy has become widely employed in this patient population. Although the addition of maintenance treatment after 1 course of single-agent rituximab prolongs time to progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a similar "duration of rituximab benefit" is observed when rituximab is administered at the time of relapse. Progression-free survival is clearly improved when rituximab is administered with chemotherapy whether it is given concomitantly, in a maintenance fashion, or both. In fact, the available data show a trend toward survival benefit with these strategies in some settings. Further follow-up will elucidate the effect of maintenance rituximab on long-term outcomes. For now, these initial data suggest that patients with indolent lymphoma might derive significant benefit from these novel therapeutic strategies.

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody active against normal and malignant B cells which has proven to be effective in the therapy of CD-20 positive lymphomas. Its B-cell cytotoxic action has also been exploited in many non-malignant autoimmune disorders in which it has been used with the aim of interfering with the production of pathologic antibodies. The present knowledge regarding the use of rituximab in antibody-associated disorders of hemostasis (i.e. idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, acquired hemophilia A, congenital hemophilia with inhibitors, acquired inhibitors against coagulation factors) is presented briefly in this review. The results suggest that rituximab can be useful in the treatment of disorders of hemostasis associated with inhibitor formation. Although collectively the number of patients treated is now quite substantial, most of the data are drawn from isolated case reports or descriptions of small, uncontrolled series. Large, prospective, randomized trials are, therefore, needed to confirm the positive, preliminary results.

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, and interferon alpha (IFN) are active agents in advanced stage, indolent lymphoma. Some data obtained in vitro suggest upregulation of CD20 by IFN, and clinical trials have reported additive or synergistic activity of IFN with rituximab. A prospective phase II study in advanced stage, follicular and non-follicular indolent lymphoma was performed. Peginterferon alpha 2b (pegIFN) 0.5 microg/kg s.c. weekly x 6 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 i.v. weekly x 4 (beginning on week 3 of pegIFN) was administered. Quantitative CD20 antigen was measured pre-treatment and pre-rituximab in lymph node aspirates. Nine patients were treated: one complete response and three partial responses; however, all relapsed within 12 months and two were withdrawn for grade 3 toxicity (both with serum sickness). No up-regulation of CD20 was documented in seven patients studied (median change in CD20: decrease by 11.9%). PegIFN plus rituximab as delivered in this study is not recommended. PegIFN does not appear to upregulate CD20 expression in peripheral lymph node tumor cells.

Purpose: The use of the CD20-specific antibody rituximab has greatly improved the response to treatment of CD20+ follicular lymphoma. Despite the success of rituximab, resistance has been reported and prognostic markers to predict individual response are lacking. The level of CD20 expression on tumors has been related to response, but results of several studies are contradictory and no clear relationship could be established. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) are thought to be important effector mechanisms, but the exact mechanism of rituximab-mediated cell kill is still unknown. Importantly, no data have been reported on the combined contribution of CDC and ADCC., Experimental Design: We have developed a system of clonally related CEM-CD20 cells by retroviral transfer of the human CD20 cDNA (n = 90). This set of cells, with the CD20 molecule as the only variable, was used to study the importance of CD20 expression level on rituximab-mediated CDC, ADCC, and the combination., Results: We show a sigmoidal correlation of CD20 expression level and rituximab-mediated killing via CDC but not ADCC. On both high and low CD20-expressing cells, all CD20 molecules were translocated into lipid rafts after rituximab binding. Furthermore, CDC and ADCC act simultaneously and CDC-resistant cells are sensitive to ADCC and vice versa., Conclusions: These findings suggest that CDC depends on CD20 expression level and that both CDC and ADCC act complementary. These data give new insights into novel strategies to improve the efficacy of CD20-specific antibodies for the treatment of CD20+ tumors.

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody has been shown to improve response rates when it is combined with standard salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A vast majority of these patients subsequently undergo high-dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation. However, the impact of rituximab on stem cell mobilization kinetics is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of high-dose rituximab given with chemotherapy on stem cell mobilization in patients with intermediate-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Thirty-six patients received ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab followed by filgrastim for stem cell mobilization. The chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated. Thirty-four of 36 patients (94%) were able to mobilize at least 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight after a median of 2 apheresis procedures. The median CD34+ cell dose collected per kilogram of recipient body weight was 6.5 x 10(6) (range, 4.65-31.15). All patients who subsequently underwent high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation experienced sustained engraftment. In conclusion, high-dose rituximab given during stem cell mobilization does not negatively affect stem cell mobilization kinetics.

In the present phase II study, we tested the efficacy of a single course of rituximab (375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22) as treatment for relapsed myeloma. The rationale for this study was the identification of a population of clonotypic CD20+ B cells that are believed to be precursors of malignant plasma cells. In addition, CD20 was expressed on 10% and 50% of bone marrow plasma cells in two of the ten patients enrolled. Following rituximab treatment, none of the patients achieved an objective response. Two patients had stable disease at month 6, the predefined end of the study, while, at that time, two patients were classified as having progressive disease. One patient opted to withdraw from the study at month 3, at which time he had stable disease. The other five patients had to be withdrawn early from the post-treatment observation because of need of salvage therapy for progressive disease. WHO grade

Intravascular lymphoma is a rare aggressive systemic neoplasm with neurological and cutaneous presentation, which commonly eludes the diagnosis ante mortem. We document a case of intravascular lymphoma in a 65-year-old man who presented with altered mental status, fevers and weight loss. The diagnosis was made by random skin biopsies demonstrating an intravascular, CD20 positive cellular infiltrate. Initial treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone and rituximab. Because of disease progression, the therapy was switched to weekly rituximab after the first cycle. A complete response was observed with resolution of symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. The patient remains in remission 3 years after completion of therapy. This is the first case report to describe a sustained remission following single-agent rituximab in the patient with neurologic involvement of intravascular lymphoma who failed antracycline-based therapy. Single-agent rituximab has activity in this disease and may be considered as a treatment option.

Purpose: Targeted radioimmunotherapy with yttrium-90 (90Y)-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin, IDEC-Biogen, San Diego, CA) has shown significant activity in the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20+ non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eligibility criteria used in phase I trials, and adopted in phase II and III trials, excluded patients with prior myeloablative therapy. We treated eight patients with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan who had prior autologous stem cell transplant, but met all other treatment criteria., Experimental Design: Eight patients with CD20+ non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had extensive prior therapy including myeloablative chemotherapy but did not receive total body irradiation. Each had bone marrow cellularity of >15%, platelet count of >100,000/mm3, and one had documented lymphomatous bone marrow involvement of <25%. The standard course of 0.3 to 0.4 mCi/kg of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan was administered to patients at full dose. 18-Flouro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans were done at pretreatment and approximately 12 weeks after treatment to assess patient response. Maximum toxicities were monitored and classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (ver. 3.0)., Results: Toxicities observed included grade 4 thrombocytopenia in three of eight evaluable patients and grade 4 neutropenia in one of eight evaluable patients. One patient had a neutropenic fever; all patients were off blood product support 12 weeks post-zevalin. Complete response by 18-flouro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging occurred in one of seven evaluable patients and one patient treated as consolidation had no evidence of disease., Conclusion: Our experience suggests that 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan treatment is safe for use in patients with prior myeloablative therapy when the general inclusion criteria are fulfilled. In this small series, the response rates, however, are limited. Nevertheless, 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan treatment may provide clinical benefit in carefully selected extensively pretreated patients.

Aim: Yttrium-90 ((90)Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) radioimmunotherapy is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), with overall response rates ranging from 74% to 82%. This retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the number of patients achieving long-term durable responses with (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan treatment., Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients (n = 211) with relapsed, refractory, or transformed indolent CD20+ B-cell NHL who were treated with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan were reviewed. Time to progression (TTP) of > or =12 months was noted in 78 patients (37%), who were identified as long-term responders and were further characterized., Results: Median age of the long-term responders was 58 years (range, 24-80 years) with 44% over 60 years, and 55% were male. Notably, 59% of patients had received > or =2 prior regimens, 33% had received > or =3 prior regimens, and 37% had failed to respond to immediate prior therapy. Median response duration was 28.1 months (range, 10.5-80.3+ months). Median TTP was 29.3 months (range, 12.1-81.5+ months). In patients with ongoing response, median TTP was 53.9 months (range, 49-82+ months)., Conclusions: (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan produces durable long-term responses in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Failure to respond to prior therapy does not preclude achieving a long-term response with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan.

The therapeutic unconjugated anti-CD20 Mab rituximab is used for the treatment of B-non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. We have studied the direct biological effects, signalling and gene expression profiles induced by rituximab in two human B-lymphoma cell lines, DHL4 and BJAB, using microarray, quantitative PCR and gel shift analysis. Rituximab alone inhibited thymidine uptake and induced homotypic adhesion in DHL4 only, but not BJAB. Analysis of Affymetrix microchips carrying probes for about 10,000 human cDNAs, allowed us to identify 16 genes in DHL4 and 12 in BJAB induced by rituximab at 4 h. Eleven and seven of these genes were specific for DHL4 and BJAB, respectively; whereas the remaining five were up-regulated in both cell lines. Mean induction ranged from 2- to 16-fold. Real time PCR analysis allowed us to confirm up-regulation of all genes identified, except one in BJAB. Time course of induction of eight genes was studied, showing peak induction in most cases at 4 h. The up-regulation of 5/5 genes was also observed with the F(ab')(2) fragment of rituximab. Analysis of three further B-cell lymphoma lines showed that gene induction is not restricted to BJAB and DHL4. Finally, we show that rituximab alone can induce AP1 activation in both cell lines and provide evidence that the ERK1/2 pathway is involved in the rituximab-mediated up-regulation of gene expression. These data demonstrate that rituximab alone has direct signalling capacity in different B-lymphoma lines, inducing distinct but overlapping sets of genes which may play a role in the biological and/or therapeutic effect of the antibody.

ABO incompatible kidney transplantations have previously only been performed after several preoperative sessions of plasmapheresis and splenectomy, with the conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol being reinforced with antilymphocyte globulin and B-cell-specific drugs, such as cyclophosphamide or deoxyspergualine. We have designed a protocol without splenectomy, based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol. The protocol calls for a 10-day pretransplantation conditioning period, starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplantation days -6, -5, -2 and -1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. Eleven patients have received transplants with this protocol. The ABO antibodies were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level post-transplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects and all patients have normal renal transplant function. We conclude that after an infusion each of rituximab and IVIG, and antigen-specific immunoadsorption; blood group-incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with excellent results using standard immunosuppression and no splenectomy.

A clinical case of patient with a simultaneous gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and MALT lymphoma in relapse is presented. Simultaneous treatment with imatinib mesylate and rituximab was given, yielded response for both tumors and was well tolerated.

Pre-formed HLA antibodies (Ab), reported as panel-reactive antibody (PRA), prolong transplant waiting time. We hypothesized that rituximab (RIT) could reduce PRA via B-cell depletion. As part of a Phase I study of single RIT dose, we studied in vivo and ex vivo effects on T-cell immune responses. Nine subjects (n = 3) were treated at 50, 150, and 375 mg/m(2). Serum interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha), IL-6, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor beta (TNF-beta), and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). T-cell function was monitored with T-cell proliferation assays. IL-6 levels rose in eight patients (7.15 +/- 4.38 pg/mL to 86.22 +/- 77.08, p = 0.021). The high-dose group had detectable TNF-betapost rituximab infusion (874.7 +/- 1466.5 pg/mL). There was no decline in T-cell proliferation in response to phytohemagglutinin or allogeneic lymphocyte stimuli. Stimulation indices in the presence of both concentrations of tetanus toxoid rose significantly at 4 weeks.

Optimal treatment for splenic marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is not clearly established. Splenectomy has been proposed as the treatment of choice in patients with cytopenias and/or symptoms caused by an enlarged spleen. Splenic MZL, which expresses the CD20 antigen on tumor cell surfaces, is a disease entity candidate to treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. We employed an immunochemotherapy regimen with rituximab/cyclophosphamide/vincristine in 3 patients with splenic MZL who had only a partial response following CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) or CHOP-like therapy. The immunochemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and all patients exhibited complete remission. To our knowledge, this is the first report of splenic MZL showing response to a combination of rituximab with chemotherapy.

Complement plays an important role in the immunotherapeutic action of the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab, and therefore we investigated whether complement might be the limiting factor in rituximab therapy. Our in vitro studies indicate that at high cell densities, binding of rituximab to human CD20(+) cells leads to loss of complement activity and consumption of component C2. Infusion of rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients also depletes complement; sera of treated patients have reduced capacity to C3b opsonize and kill CD20(+) cells unless supplemented with normal serum or component C2. Initiation of rituximab infusion in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients leads to rapid clearance of CD20(+) cells. However, substantial numbers of B cells, with significantly reduced levels of CD20, return to the bloodstream immediately after rituximab infusion. In addition, a mAb specific for the Fc region of rituximab does not bind to these recirculating cells, suggesting that the rituximab-opsonized cells were temporarily sequestered by the mononuclear phagocytic system, and then released back into the circulation after the rituximab-CD20 complexes were removed by phagocytic cells. Western blots provide additional evidence for this escape mechanism that appears to occur as a consequence of CD20 loss. Treatment paradigms to prevent this escape, such as use of engineered or alternative anti-CD20 mAbs, may allow for more effective immunotherapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In recent years preclinical and clinical studies have been undertaken with selected monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) either alone or coniugated to toxins in patients with several lymphoid malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) and hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Two MoAbs, directed against CD20 antigen (Rituximab, RIT) and CD52 antigen (Campath-1H, alemtuzumab, ALT) demonstrate significant activity in CLL. The most notable success to data has been achieved with ALT, both in previously treated and untreated patients with CLL. ALT is a humanized rat IgG1 antibody that binds to the cell membrane of virtually all normal as well as malignant lymphocytes. In the vast majority of CLL patients ALT causes constant reduction of abnormal blood lymphocytes, usually in less than 4 weeks, and disappearance of CD5/CD19 co-expression cells from blood. The regression of lymphoid infiltration from other sites is less clear. ALT is also highly active in patients with CLL in progression, even refractory to fludarabine (FA). Hematological toxicity, especially long-lasting lymphocytopenia, was noted in the majority of patients. The most important clinical side effects of ALT treatment were infections, mainly herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation. RIT is also active in CLL in conventional doses. However some studies suggest that higher doses are more effective than standard doses, used routinely in other lymphoid malignancies. The activity of ALT and RIT in CLL patients resistant to FA and their synergistic interactions with cytotoxic drugs suggests that a combination of these agents may lead to further progress in the treatment of this disease. The T-cell variant of PLL has demonstrated impressive responses to ALT in several trials even if the patients were refractory to deoxycoformycin (DCF) and other agents. However, this MoAb is not curative, because all patients eventually relapsed. Consequently, treatment with ALT may need to be associated with stem cell transplantation to consolidate and maintain long-term remissions. Recently anti-CD22 and anti-CD25 immunotoxins have been investigated in purine analogues refractory or relapsed HCL. The presented results indicate that these agents are highly active and well tolerated even if the patients were resistant to 2-CdA or DCF.

Lymphoid cells in most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), when treated with rituximab, become CD20-. This is thought to be due to masking of CD20 by rituximab. We used specific antimouse immunoglobulin antibodies to detect rituximab on the surface of CLL lymphocytes and we demonstrate that rituximab is rarely detectable after therapy. Only 3 of 65 patients with CLL had rituximab detectable on their lymphocytes after rituximab therapy despite the fact that most had no detectable CD20 expression. In vitro mixing of CLL or Raji cells with rituximab demonstrated that rituximab was detectable on the surface of cells due to its binding to CD20. However, the addition of plasma led to the down-modulation of CD20 expression, and the rituximab became undetectable. This down-modulation of CD20 protein expression was associated with a down-modulation of CD20 mRNA. CLL cells that lost their CD20 expression regained CD20 expression after 24 hours in culture. These data suggest that rituximab therapy leads to a substantial but transient down-modulation of CD20 expression and that negativity for CD20 in cells from patients treated with rituximab is not necessarily due to CD20 masking. The importance of this down-modulation in the efficacy of current therapy with rituximab needs further investigation.

Purpose: Epratuzumab is a novel humanized antihuman CD22 IgG1 antibody that has recently shown promising clinical activity, both as a single agent and in combination with rituximab, in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). In an attempt to better understand the mode of action of epratuzumab, the antibody was tested in vitro in a variety of cell-based assays similar to those used to evaluate the biological activity of other therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab. In this report, we present epratuzumab activities as they relate to binding, signaling, and internalization of the receptor CD22., Methods: Chinese hamster ovary-expressed CD22 extracellular domain was used to measure epratuzumab affinity on Biacore. CD22 receptor density and internalization rate were measured indirectly using a monovalently labeled, noncompeting (with epratuzumab) anti-CD22 antibody on Burkitt lymphoma cell lines, primary B cells derived from fresh tonsils, and B cells separated from peripheral blood samples obtained from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or healthy volunteers. Epratuzumab-induced CD22 phosphorylation was measured by immunoprecipitation/Western blot and compared with that induced by anti-IgM stimulation., Results: Epratuzumab binds to CD22-extracellular domain, with an affinity of K(D) = 0.7 nM. Binding of epratuzumab to B cell lines, or primary B cells from healthy individuals and patients with NHL, results in rapid internalization of the CD22/antibody complex. Internalization appears to be faster at early time points in cell lines than in primary B cells and NHL patient-derived B cells, but the maximum internalization reached is comparable for all B cell populations after several hours of treatment and appears to reach saturation at antibody concentrations of 1-5 micro g/ml. Finally, epratuzumab binding results in modest but significant CD22 phosphorylation., Conclusions: Epratuzumab represents an excellent anti-CD22 ligating agent, highly efficacious in inducing CD22 internalization, and can induce phosphorylation. Although we cannot unequivocally demonstrate here that epratuzumab-induced internalization and signaling of CD22 directly contribute to its therapeutic efficacy, these properties are the fundamental characteristics of the target CD22 and its interaction with epratuzumab. Similar results were observed when epratuzumab was tested in vitro on Burkitt B cell lines as well as on primary normal B cells and neoplastic B cells separated from fresh peripheral blood samples from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Currently available monoclonal antibodies against the B cell surface antigen CD20 have been employed to explore whether specific inhibition of B cells may help improve the outcome of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and may avoid the side effects of steroids and immunosuppressants. This prospective, observational study evaluated the 1-yr outcome of eight IMN patients with persistent (>6 mo) urinary protein excretion > 3.5 g/24 h given four weekly infusions of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (375 mg/m(2)). At 3 and 12 mo, proteinuria significantly decreased from mean (+/- SD) 8.6 +/- 4.2 to 4.3 +/- 3.3 (-51%, P < 0.005) and 3.0 +/- 2.5 (-66%, P < 0.005) g/24 h, albumin fractional clearance from 2.3 +/- 2.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.7 (-47%, P < 0.05) and 0.5 +/- 0.6 (-76%, P < 0.003), and serum albumin concentration increased from 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 3.1 +/- 0.3 (+21%, P < 0.05) and 3.5 +/- 0.4 (+41%, P < 0.05) mg/dl. At 12 mo, proteinuria decreased to < or =0.5 g/24 h or < or =3.5 g/24 h in two and three patients, respectively. Proteinuria decreased in the remaining patients by 74%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. Body weight, diastolic BP, and serum cholesterol progressively decreased in parallel with an improvement of edema in all patients. Renal function stabilized (Delta1/creatinine: +0.002 +/- 0.007). CD20 B lymphocytes fell below normal ranges up to study-end. No patient had major drug-related events or major changes in other laboratory parameters. Rituximab thus promotes sustained disease remission in patients otherwise predicted to progress to ESRD, and it is safe. The long-term risk/benefit profile of this novel, disease-specific approach seems much more favorable to that of commonly employed immunosuppressive drugs.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia is a low-grade lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma characterized by CD20 expression on malignant cells. Several studies have indicated that the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has activity against this disease. Thus, we performed a prospective study in which 17 previously untreated patients with symptomatic macroglobulinemia were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 weeks. Three months after completion of rituximab, patients without evidence of progressive disease received repeat 4-week courses of this agent. Six patients (35%) achieved a partial response after extended treatment with rituximab. Median time to response was 3 months. The median time to progression (TTP) for all patients was 13 months. One of 6 responding patients has progressed at 10 months, while the other 5 patients remain progression free with a follow-up range of > 22-40 months. Eight patients (47%) were rated as stable disease, and their median TTP was 9 months. Treatment with rituximab was well tolerated and was not associated with myelosuppression; one third of the patients experienced infusion-related toxicity, usually fever and chills of mild degree. Our prospective trial of extended rituximab therapy for previously untreated patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia indicates that this agent is active, well tolerated, and might be associated with a long period without the need for further treatment. Studies that will combine rituximab with chemotherapy or with other monoclonal antibodies might be of interest.