Search

Antibody therapeutics with poor solubility in the subcutaneous matrix may carry unintended risks when administered to patients. The objective of this work was to estimate the risk of antibodies that precipitate in vitro at neutral pH by determining the impact of poor solubility on distribution of the drug from the injection site as well as immunogenicity in vivo. Using fluorescence imaging in a mouse model, we show that one such precipitation-prone antibody is retained at the injection site in the subcutaneous space longer than a control antibody. In addition, we demonstrate that retention at the injection site through aggregation is concentration-dependent and leads to macrophage association and germinal center localization. Although there was delayed disposition of the aggregated antibody to draining lymph nodes, no overall impact on the immune response in lymph nodes, systemic exposure of the antibody, or enhancement of the anti-drug antibody response was evident. Unexpectedly, retention of the precipitated antibody in the subcutaneous space delayed the onset of the immune response and led to an immune suppressive response. Thus, we conclude that precipitation due to poor solubility of high doses of antibody formulations delivered subcutaneously may not be of special concern in terms of exposure or immunogenicity., (Copyright © 2019 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the clinical setting, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against biotherapeutics can influence patient safety and interfere with product efficacy. High immunogenicity has been addressed in clinic by concomitant immune suppression, such as co-administration of methotrexate with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and combination tacrolimus/sirolimus treatment for prophylaxis against organ transplant rejection. This study investigates the use of such immune suppressants in mitigating ADA responses to a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb1) in preclinical animal studies. Three groups of Sprague Dawley rats (n = 18) were treated with low (0.01 mg/kg), moderate (50 mg/kg), or high (300 mg/kg) doses of mAb1. Experimental groups also received either methotrexate or tacrolimus/sirolimus immune suppressive regimens. ELISA-based methods were utilized to measure and characterize ADA and mAb1 pharmacokinetics (PK). Results demonstrated a stepwise increase in immunogenicity with mAb1 dosage. Methotrexate significantly lowered incidence of anti-variable region antibodies at moderate mAb1 dose (P < 0.05), while tacrolimus/sirolimus did likewise at moderate and high doses (P < 0.01) of mAb1. Except for low-dose mAb1 + methotrexate, all immunosuppressed groups displayed more than a 70-fold decrease in ADA magnitude (P < 0.05). This abrogation in ADA response correlated with more mAb1 in circulation by week 4 for moderate- and high-dosed mAb1 groups. These data provide an approach to mitigate preclinical immunogenicity by the use of immunosuppressant regimens. Such preconditioning can support preclinical drug development of human therapeutics that are antigenic to animals. Similar approaches could be investigated for wider application to novel therapeutics.

An In Vitro Comparative Immunogenicity Assessment (IVCIA) assay was evaluated as a tool for predicting the potential relative immunogenicity of biotherapeutic attributes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from up to 50 healthy naïve human donors were monitored up to 8 days for T-cell proliferation, the number of IL-2 or IFN-γ secreting cells, and the concentration of a panel of secreted cytokines. The response in the assay to 10 monoclonal antibodies was found to be in agreement with the clinical immunogenicity, suggesting that the assay might be applied to immunogenicity risk assessment of antibody biotherapeutic attributes. However, the response in the assay is a measure of T-cell functional activity and the alignment with clinical immunogenicity depends on several other factors. The assay was sensitive to sequence variants and could differentiate single point mutations of the same biotherapeutic. Nine mAbs that were highly aggregated by stirring induced a higher response in the assay than the original mAbs before stirring stress, in a manner that did not match the relative T-cell response of the original mAbs. In contrast, mAbs that were glycated by different sugars (galactose, glucose, and mannose) showed little to no increase in response in the assay above the response to the original mAbs before glycation treatment. The assay was also used successfully to assess similarity between multiple lots of the same mAb, both from the same manufacturer and from different manufacturers (biosimilars). A strategy for using the IVCIA assay for immunogenicity risk assessment during the entire lifespan development of biopharmaceuticals is proposed.