Search

Patients with haemato-oncological malignancies are one of the high-risk groups for a severe course in case of COVID-19 infections. Furthermore, vaccination results in significantly lower response rates in haematological malignancies and lower antibody levels in patients with solid cancer. We investigated efficacy and safety of a heterologous booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S DNA vector vaccine in haemato-oncological patients without antibody response after double-dose BNT162b2 messenger (m-)RNA COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 32 haemato-oncological non-responders to double-dose BNT162b2 received a heterologous booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S. Blood samples were assessed directly before the vaccination (T0) and four weeks after (T1). Safety assessment was performed using a standardised questionnaire. The overall response rate was 31%, with a mean (SD) antibody titre of 693·79 (1 096·99) binding activity units (BAU)/ml. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphoma showed a significantly lower response rate (P = 0·048). Adverse events were reported in 29·6% of patients, of which 7·1% were graded as severe, including grade III and IV events following the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE). The heterologous booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S led to a serological response in nine out of 29 patients without response after double-dose BNT162b2. Furthermore, the vaccination was safe in our cohort, leading to mainly mild local and systemic reactions. Overall, this vaccination regimen should be further evaluated to increase the response rate in the highly vulnerable population of haemato-oncological patients., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Haemato-oncological patients are at risk in case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Currently, vaccination is the best-evaluated preventive strategy. In the present study, we aimed to assess serological response, predictive markers, and safety of BNT162b2 in haemato-oncological patients. A total of 259 haemato-oncological patients were vaccinated with two 30 µg doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart. Serological response was assessed by ELECSYS ® Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S immunoassay before vaccination, and at 3 and 7 weeks after the first dose (T1, T2). Safety assessment was performed. At T2 spike protein receptor binding domain (S/RBD) antibodies were detected in 71·4% of haematological and in 94·5% of oncological patients (P < 0·001). Haematological patients receiving systemic treatment had a 14·2-fold increased risk of non-responding (95% confidence interval 3·2-63·3, P = 0·001). Subgroups of patients with lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were at highest risk of serological non-response. Low immunoglobulin G (IgG) level, lymphocyte- and natural killer (NK)-cell counts were significantly associated with poor serological response (P < 0·05). Vaccination was well tolerated with only 2·7% of patients reporting severe side-effects. Patients with side-effects developed a higher S/RBD-antibody titre compared to patients without side-effects (P = 0·038). Haematological patients under treatment were at highest risk of serological non-response. Low lymphocytes, NK cells and IgG levels were found to be associated with serological non-response. Serological response in oncological patients was encouraging. The use of BNT162b2 is safe in haemato-oncological patients., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Antibody responses to tumor antigens play an important role in initiating a cellular antitumor response with respect to antigen cross-presentation and T cell cross-priming. Successful vaccination strategies rely on an optimally timed activation of the humoral and cellular immune system by using appropriate adjuvant stimulation. The LUD99-008 trial used the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 formulated with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant injected into patients intramuscularly. It was shown that this vaccination strategy is a safe and highly potent activator of the humoral and cellular immune system. Using the RAYS technology, we analyzed in detail the humoral immune response in these patients before and after vaccination: during the course of repeated vaccinations with the adjuvant, antibody titers against NY-ESO-1 and cross-reactivity to LAGE 1A and B increased as an indicator of an enhanced immune response, whereas no antibody response could be detected after vaccination without the adjuvant. Analysis of single fragments of the NY-ESO-1 protein revealed that the humoral response was almost exclusively directed against the N-terminal fragments and the number of fragments and their length being recognized by the NY-ESO-1-specific antibodies increased during the course of vaccination. The humoral immune response mainly consisted of antibodies of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclass. We rarely found IgG2 and IgG4 subclass antibodies. Our results support the implication that target-specific antibodies raised after vaccination contribute to the stimulation of an effective T cell response against the target antigen.