Search

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently proven their efficacy and safety, as primary and secondary prevention agents for thrombosis in cancer patients. We aimed to determine if DOACs might be a suitable choice to reduce the thrombotic risk in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients.We analysed a large multicentric cohort of MPN patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban after atrial fibrillation (AF) or thrombotic events.We included 135 MPN patients with a median follow-up of 23.8 months since DOAC initiation. Twenty patients (14.8 %) developed 30 thrombotic events (28 arterial thromboses in 19 patients) for a global incidence of 6.5 % patient-years. No difference was highlighted between apixaban and rivaroxaban in terms of thrombosis risk, but the incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher on low-dose DOACs (11.9 vs. 4.5 % patient-years, p = 0.04). Bleeding events were more frequent in the full-dose group (41.2 vs. 15.2 %, p = 0.006). However, major and clinically relevant non major (CRNM) bleeding events occurred in 18 patients (13.3 %), with no difference between the groups. Age was the only identified thrombotic risk factor, whereas risk factors for major or CRNM bleeding were a full-dose treatment regimen and a combination of DOAC/low-dose aspirin.DOACs seem effective in preventing venous thrombosis in MPN patients with AF or VTE. For these high-risk patients, low-dose DOACs exposed patients to more arterial thrombosis but fewer bleeding events. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate and compare DOACs to the currently recommended antithrombotic drugs for high-risk MPN patients.

The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is discussed. Results from randomized controlled trials are available. It has been stated that a history of arterial thrombosis and triple positivity was associated with a higher risk of thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs. However, their efficacy in non-high-risk APS patients with isolated venous manifestations is unsolved. Therefore, we performed a sub-group analysis of a previously published meta-analysis after the exclusion of patients with triple positivity and those with history of arterial or small vessel thrombosis. We identified 290 APS patients with previous isolated venous event treated with DOACs; among them, 25 (8.6%) patients experienced a recurrent thrombosis in comparison to 16% in the original cohort. We found that the rate of recurrent thrombosis is lower in APS patients with isolated venous manifestations than in overall APS patients including high-risk patients. Research about DOAC use in non-high-risk APS patients needs to be continued.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but their clinical efficacy and safety are not established in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) patients. There is only one randomized controlled trial published while others are still ongoing. Many non-randomized studies have been published in this field with conflicting opinions.We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 2000 until March 2018 regarding APS patients treated with DOACs. We performed a patient-level data meta-analysis to a) estimate the prevalence of recurrent thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs in the literature, and b) identify variables associated with recurrent thrombosis.We identified 47 studies corresponding to 447 APS patients treated with DOACs. Three commercially available DOACs were analyzed: rivaroxaban (n = 290), dabigatran etexilate (n = 144) and apixaban (n = 13). A total of 73 out of 447 patients (16%) experienced a recurrent thrombosis while on DOACs with a mean duration until thrombosis of 12.5 months. Rates of recurrent thromboses were 16.9% and 15% in APS patients receiving either anti-Xa inhibitors or dabigatran respectively. Triple positivity (positivity for all three antiphospholipid antibodies) was associated with a four-fold increased risk of recurrent thrombosis (56% vs 23%; OR = 4.3 [95%CI; 2.3-7.7], p 0.0001) as well as a higher number of clinical criteria for APS classification. In patients treated with anti-Xa inhibitors, history of arterial thrombosis was associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis (32% vs 14%; OR = 2.8 [95%CI; 1.4-5.7], p = 0.006). In conclusion, DOACs are not effective in all APS patients and should not be used routinely in these patients. Randomized controlled trials assessing clinical efficacy and safety as primary endpoints are underway. In the meantime, a registry of APS patients on DOACs could be proposed to establish in which APS subgroups DOACs would be a safe alternative to warfarin.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing of direct oral anticoagulants is frequent with the most common errors being dosage, administration, and duration of therapy. We developed RecosDoc-MTeV, a documentary-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the management of direct oral anticoagulant prescription to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism. Simultaneously, the network of Parisian public hospitals (AP-HP, France) developed narrative clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and a companion smartphone application to enhance medication and patient safety related to direct oral anticoagulant prescription. To assess the effectiveness of these CDS tools, we performed a retrospective review of 274 random patients hospitalized in 2017, which were either at risk of venous thromboembolism or actually treated for the disease. Consistency between the two CDS tools was measured at 96.7%. Administered treatments were compliant in 67.2% and 72.3% of the cases, with AP-HP CPGs and RecosDoc-MTeV, respectively. These results support that implementing CDSSs for the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants may ensure safe prescribing of high-risk medications.