Search

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background Oral anticoagulation with warfarin is the cornerstone therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention. Multi-disciplinary anticoagulation management services have been shown to be cost-effective in the United States, Hong Kong and Thailand, but the findings are not readily generalizable to Singapore's healthcare system. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic (ACC) compared with usual care (UC) for the management of older adults with AF receiving oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Setting Pharmacist-managed ACC in an academic medical centre. Method A Markov model with 3-month cycle length and 30-year time horizon compared costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ACC and UC from the patient's and healthcare provider's perspectives. Four pathways based on time in therapeutic range (TTR) were: ACC TTR < 70 %, ACC TTR ≥ 70 %, UC TTR < 70 % and UC TTR ≥ 70 %. A hypothetical cohort of 70-year-old Singaporean AF patients receiving warfarin was utilised. Local data from national disease registries, patient surveys and hospital databases were used. When local data was not available, published studies on Asian populations were utilized when available. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainties. Costs and QALYs were discounted annually by 3 %. Main outcome measure Costs and QALYs of ACC and UC. Results Pharmacist-managed ACC was found to dominate UC in all comparisons. It improved effectiveness by 0.19 and 0.13 QALYs at TTR < 70 % and TTR ≥ 70 % respectively compared with UC. From the patient's perspective, ACC reduced costs by SG$1222.67 (€1110.24) for TTR < 70 % and SG$1008.16 (€915.46) for TTR ≥ 70 %. Similar trends were observed from the healthcare provider's perspective, with ACC reducing costs by SG$1444.79 (€1311.94) for TTR < 70 % and SG$1269.17 (€1152.46) for TTR ≥ 70 % compared with UC. The results were robust to variations of the parameters over their plausible ranges in one-way sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that ACC was cost-effective more than 79 % of the time from both perspectives at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SG$69,050 (€62,701) per QALY. Conclusion Pharmacist-managed ACC is more effective and less costly compared with UC regardless of the quality of anticoagulation therapy. The findings support the current body of evidence demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of ACC.

Introduction: Elderly patients intrinsically have higher bleeding risks, deterring clinicians from prescribing them oral anticoagulants. Setting a narrow international normalized ratio (INR) target range might potentially mitigate some of these risks. This study sought to compare the outcomes of elderly patients who were assigned to either a narrow INR target range or the conventional INR target range in a real-world environment., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study with the primary and secondary outcomes being the mean percentage time above INR 3.0 and the mean percentage time below INR 2.0 and the incidents of bleeding and thromboembolism associated with oral anticoagulant therapy, respectively. Patients and health care workers managing them had no prior knowledge of this study., Results: Data of 150 patients with a narrow INR target range (2.0-2.5) and 164 patients with a conventional INR target range (2.0-3.0) were collected and analyzed. The narrow INR group had significantly higher underlying risks of bleeding than the conventional INR group. Patients in the narrow INR group had a significantly lower percentage time above INR 3.0 but no significant difference in the percentage time below INR 2.0. Adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for bleeding events was significantly lower for the narrow INR group, while the adjusted IRR for thromboembolic events between both groups was similar., Conclusion: Patients assigned to a narrow INR target range in real-world practice spent a significantly lower amount of time below an INR of 3.0 compared to conventional INR target range with lower incidents of bleeding complications and no increase in subtherapeutic INRs., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Strokes can have a catastrophic impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition to warfarin, two novel oral anticoagulants, i.e., dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been approved to prevent strokes. This study aimed to use direct measures to elicit patient-reported utilities (i.e., preferences) for anticoagulant-related outcomes. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 100 patients taking warfarin in an anticoagulation clinic. Utilities for six long-term and four short-term anticoagulant-related health states were elicited by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) methods. Health states with the highest SG-derived mean utility values were "well on rivaroxaban" (mean ± SD = 0.90 ± 0.15), "well on warfarin" (0.86 ± 0.17), and "well on dabigatran" (0.83 ± 0.18). Approximately half of the patients considered major ischemic stroke (-1.57 ± 6.77) and intracranial hemorrhage (-1.99 ± 6.98) to be worse than death. The percentages of patients who considered a particular health state worse than death ranged from 0 to 55 % among various health states assessed. The VAS had similar findings. Good logical consistency was observed in both VAS- and SG-derived utility values. Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage had a significant impact on patients' HRQoL. Greater variation in patients' preferences was observed for more severely impaired health states, indicating the need for individualized medical decision-making. In this study, both long-term and short-term health states were included in the utility assessment. The findings of this study can be used in cost-utility analysis of future anticoagulation therapies.

Introduction: A better understanding of patients' knowledge, satisfaction and concerns can identify deficits and help develop targeted patient education. This study aimed to examine patients' knowledge, satisfaction and concerns regarding warfarin therapy and assess their association with warfarin adherence and international normalized ratio (INR) control., Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a convenience sample of patients taking warfarin in an anticoagulation clinic. The questionnaire consisted of questions on patients' knowledge, satisfaction and concerns regarding warfarin treatment. Patients' warfarin refill records and time within the therapeutic INR range were retrieved from hospital databases., Results: One hundred and eighty-three patients participated in the survey. Patients had inadequate knowledge of warfarin-diet and warfarin-drug interactions. Over 40% of the respondents were not satisfied with the waiting time to see a pharmacist. The most common concerns of taking warfarin were worries about warfarin-drug interactions (36.1%), forgetting to take warfarin (26.2%) and worries about side effects (25.7%). Higher satisfaction was associated with better knowledge (r=0.24, p=0.001) and fewer concerns (rs=-0.23, p=0.002). Better knowledge and higher satisfaction were associated with higher warfarin adherence (rs=0.21 and 0.16; p=0.01 and 0.046, respectively). Better knowledge, higher satisfaction, fewer concerns, and better warfarin adherence were associated with good INR control (p=0.003, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.003, respectively)., Conclusions: This study highlighted patients' concerns and deficits in knowledge regarding warfarin treatment, and also demonstrated their association with warfarin adherence and INR control., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In order to improve warfarin adherence, we must first know the rate of non-adherence and the reasons for it. Assessment of warfarin adherence is important in improving patients' warfarin-taking behavior and International Normalized Ratio (INR) control. This study aimed to compare three medication adherence measures in patients taking warfarin: the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), the 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and medication refill adherence (MRA). A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a convenience sample of 174 patients taking warfarin at an anticoagulation clinic. A survey questionnaire that included the MMAS, VAS, and demographic and warfarin-related clinical questions was administered to patients in English or Chinese depending on their preferences. The MRA and INR values were retrieved from hospital electronic databases. Most participants were adherent to warfarin as indicated by the three measures. A weak association was found between the MMAS and the other two adherence measures. The MMAS and MRA were associated with the percentage of INRs within range in the past 2 weeks. Moreover, the MRA was weakly associated with time within the therapeutic INR range in the past 3 months and 2 weeks. The findings provide insights into the differences among three medication adherence measures and may assist healthcare providers to select the most suitable measure for the assessment of warfarin adherence.

Summary: Warfarin-induced bleeding complications and high inter-patient variability are major hindrances to oral anticoagulant therapy. The present study identifies the influence of VKORC1 diplotypes, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 variants on warfarin disposition and dose requirements in Chinese patients (n=107). The study subjects were genotyped for VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphic variants. Weekly warfarin dose requirements and S-warfarin clearance were stratified by VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics. The major VKORC1 diplotypes were H1-H1 (62%), H1-H7 (18%) and H1-H(*)(b) (10%). Warfarin dose requirements were significantly lower in patients with VKORC1 H1-H1 and H1-H(*)(a) diplotypes compared to patients harboring the H1-H7 and H1-H(*)(b) diplotypes (P<0.05). Hepatic tissues with H1-H1 diplotype had significantly lower expression of VKORC1 mRNA compared with liver tissues carrying the H1-H7 and H1-H(*)(b) diplotypes (P=0.006). The percent variability explained by VKORC1 diplotype status was 59.1% while the CYP2C9 genotype status accounted for 6.9% variability in warfarin dose requirements. Patient age and weight were significant covariates accounting for 29% and 8.6% of warfarin dose variability, respectively. The present study shows that VKORC1 diplotype status, CYP2C9 genotype, age and weight are significant covariates, accounting for 73.4% of interindividual variability in warfarin dose requirements among Chinese patients. Translation of these findings into clinical guidelines for warfarin dosing may be required to assess its impact on the safety and efficacy of warfarin.

Thrombin generation assays and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clot waveform analysis (CWA), are some examples of global coagulation assays. Each modality evaluates different aspects of the clot forming process to globally define haemostasis with exclusive measurement parameters. Data on CWA are emerging, but its performance against other haemostatic assays is yet to be ascertained. This study evaluates the correlation between aPTT-based CWA and CAT parameters across a range of INR in warfarin-treated patients. A prospective study consisting of patients on warfarin anticoagulation with varying INR levels. CWA and CAT were performed for the study subjects. 54 samples were included covering an INR range from 1.33–6.89, with a mean of 4.31 +/- 1.13. For CAT parameters, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin were assessed. Both unadjusted and adjusted (adjusted for final plateau transmittance) aPTT-based CWA were evaluated for parameters min1 (maximum velocity), min2 (maximum acceleration) and max2 (maximum deceleration). Peak thrombin showed significant correlation with all CWA parameters (min1: r = 0.435, P<0.001; min2: r = 0.485, P<0.001; max2: r = 0.578, P<0.001; adjusted min1: r = 0.734, P<0.001, adjusted min2: r = 0.693, P<0.001; adjusted max2: r = 0.751, P<0.001). ETP correlated significantly with all CWA parameters except unadjusted min1 (min1: r = 0.235, P = 0.087; min2: r = 0.326, P = 0.016; max2: r = 0.437, P<0.001; adjusted min1: r = 0.610, P<0.001, adjusted min2: r = 0.563, P<0.001; adjusted max2: r = 0.642, P<0.001). We demonstrated a modest correlation between CAT and CWA parameters. Adjusted CWA improved this correlation. These findings provide additional understanding of CWA and it's role in the evaluation of global haemostatic function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]