Search

Lacosamide (LCM) is a treatment option for status epilepticus (SE) described in several series. We therefore proposed to describe its use in status epilepticus patients in our hospital. All patients admitted to our hospital for SE from September 2010 to April 2012 were evaluated. We collected related variables including the type of SE, etiology, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used, loading dose of AEDs, cessation of SE after AEDs, ICU admission and mortality. In those patients receiving LCM, we reviewed the infusion rate and time to response. We compared patients receiving LCM with patients in whom it was not used. This was a retrospective and uncontrolled study. A total of 92 patients were included; 67.7 % of SE patients who received LCM responded to treatment. The vast majority of the patients presented non-convulsive and motor focal SE. When we selected patients to receive four or more AEDs, the LCM efficacy was 55.6 %, a very similar result compared to when it was not used. Subsequently, we analyzed the sample regarding the AED administered as the second or third line of treatment, and the responder rate was significantly higher when LCM was used (84.6 vs. 47.8 %, p 0.041). After an adjusted regression analysis, the use of LCM was independently associated with cessation of SE. The total percentage of undesirable effects was very low (12 %), and they were all mild. No relationship was found between a specific etiology and better response. LCM is a useful drug that represents an alternative in the treatment of non-convulsive or focal motor SE. Its efficacy might be more important when it is administered as a second or third option after benzodiazepines. A randomized trial is required to confirm these results.

Introduction: Encephalopathy due to valproic acid (VPA) is a rare complication leading to a disorder that affects the patient's mental status to a greater or lesser extent and which can be accompanied by a paradoxical worsening of the seizures. The diagnosis is obvious when it appears within the context of hyperammonemia or a liver pathology, but can be difficult to diagnose if it appears in isolation in patients who show no other signs of intoxication due to VPA., Case Report: We report the case of an adolescent who suffered idiopathic generalised epilepsy and presented sub-acute cognitive impairment and a worsening of his pattern of seizures some months after starting treatment with VPA. These manifestations were accompanied by a slowing of the baseline electroencephalogram (EEG) tracing; no biochemical signs of overdosage or toxicity that could be attributed to the drug or any other possible aetiology were observed. Withdrawing VPA resulted in a swift improvement in the patient's mental status and in the control of his seizures. Likewise, EEG recordings also returned to normal., Conclusions: Encephalopathy due to VPA should be considered in patients who present a deterioration of their neurological status, whether associated to an aggravation of their seizures or not, despite the absence of any analytical signs suggestive of VPA toxicity or overdosage. If liver functioning is not affected, withdrawal of the drug will determine the disappearance of the symptoms and will also allow confirmation of the diagnosis.