Search

Purpose: New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly applied in second-line therapy of status epilepticus (SE). In our study, we analyzed the impact of the choice of second-line AEDs on the course and prognosis of SE., Methods: This retrospective single- center study used data of an 8 year cohort of SE in adults from 2007 to 2014. Based on the year of market introduction with a cutoff at 1990, we classified AEDs as traditional or new. Prescription pattern associated differences in prognosis were measured through univariate and multivariable analysis of 3 endpoints: occurrence of refractory SE (RSE), functional outcome in survivors to discharge (good: mRS at discharge <3 or identical to admission mRS; otherwise poor), and in-hospital mortality., Results: From 362 SE episodes during the study period, 222 episodes were included into the study, among those 150 episodes treated with new and 72 with traditional AEDs. Use of new AEDs increased during the study period. After adjustment for confounders, treatment with new AEDs was on the one hand associated with higher rate of RSE occurrence (OR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.05-3.62, p = 0.03), but, on the other hand, also with better functional outcome at discharge (OR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.16-6.00, p = 0.02), while it was not an independent predictor of in- hospital mortality (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.33-2.33, p = 0.80)., Conclusion: Our observation that new AEDs may be associated with a higher rate of RSE development and relatively better functional outcome when adjusted for the premorbid mRS needs confirmation in prospective studies., (Copyright © 2019 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) may require treatment with continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (cIVADs) for seizure control. The use of cIVADs, however, was recently associated with poor outcome in status epilepticus (SE), raising the question of whether cIVAD therapy should be delayed for attempts to halt seizures with repeated non-anesthetic antiepileptic drugs. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of differences in therapeutic approaches on RSE outcome using timing of cIVAD therapy as a surrogate for treatment aggressiveness., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study over 14 years (n = 77) comparing patients with RSE treated with cIVADs within and after 48 h after RSE onset, and functional status at last follow-up was the primary outcome (good = return to premorbid baseline or modified Rankin Scale score of less than 3). Secondary outcomes included discharge functional status, in-hospital mortality, RSE termination, induction of burst suppression, use of thiopental, duration of RSE after initiation of cIVADs, duration of mechanical ventilation, and occurrence of super-refractory SE. Analysis was performed on the total cohort and on subgroups defined by RSE severity according to the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and by the variables contained therein., Results: Fifty-three (68.8%) patients received cIVADs within the first 48 h. Early cIVAD treatment was independently associated with good outcome (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.175, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.273-7.918; P = 0.013) as well as lower chance of both induction of burst suppression (aRR 0.661, 95% CI 0.507-0.861; P = 0.002) and use of thiopental (aRR 0.446, 95% CI 0.205-0.874; P = 0.043). RSE duration after cIVAD initiation was shorter in the early cIVAD cohort (hazard ratio 1.796, 95% CI 1.047-3.081; P = 0.033). Timing of cIVAD use did not impact the remaining secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed early cIVAD impact on the primary outcome to be driven by patients with STESS of less than 3., Conclusions: Patients with RSE treated with cIVADs may benefit from early initiation of such therapy.

Purpose: Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) represents a challenging medical condition with high morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to establish variables related to SRSE development and outcome., Methods: We retrospectively screened our databases for refractory SE (RSE) and SRSE episodes between January 2001 and January 2015. Baseline demographics, SE characteristics, and variables reflecting the clinical course were compared in order to identify factors independently associated with SRSE occurrence. Within the SRSE cohort, predictors of in-hospital mortality as well as good functional outcome in survivors to discharge were established through univariate and multivariable analyses., Results: A total of 131 episodes were included, among those 46 (35.1%) meeting the criteria of SRSE. Comparison of RSE and SRSE episodes revealed a lower premorbid mRS score (odds ratio (OR) per mRS point, 0.769; p=0.039) and non-convulsive SE (NCSE) in coma (OR, 4.216; p=0.008) as independent predictors of SRSE. SRSE in-hospital mortality was associated with age (OR, 1.091 per increasing year; p=0.020) and worse premorbid functional status (OR, 1.938 per mRS point; p=0.044). Good functional outcome in survivors was independently related to shorter SRSE duration (OR, 0.714 per day; p=0.038)., Conclusion: Better premorbid functional status and NCSE in coma as worst seizure type indicate a role of acute underlying etiologies in the development of SRSE. In-hospital mortality in SRSE is determined by nonmodifiable factors, while functional outcome in survivors depends on seizure duration underscoring the need of achieving rapid seizure termination., (Copyright © 2017 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clobazam (CLB) is a well characterized antiepileptic drug (AED) that differs from other benzodiazepines by its basic chemical structure and pharmacodynamic properties. Only one previous study examined the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in refractory status epilepticus (RSE)., Methods: We analyzed RSE episodes treated in our institution between 2001 and 2012. Successful treatment with CLB was scored if CLB was the last AED added to therapy before RSE termination. We assessed the differences between patients with and without CLB and correlated CLB with outcome. Among patients treated with CLB, we studied responders and non-responders and compared our CLB cohort with recently published data., Results: CLB was part of the AED regimen in 24/70 (34.3 %) RSE episodes. In six of these (25.0 %) RSE resolution was attributed to CLB. Baseline characteristics of episodes with and without CLB treatment showed no significant differences and RSE termination rates were very similar (83.3 % vs. 80.4 %). CLB was administered in clinically more complex RSE with longer RSE duration and worse outcome, but CLB was not related independently to outcome. Comparison of our results with previously published data revealed that baseline characteristics as well as CLB maintenance doses and time of treatment initiation were similar in both cohorts. CLB was less frequently the last AED added to RSE therapy in our patients indicating a lower treatment success rate than previously reported., Conclusions: CLB represents a reasonable AED and promising add-on agent for treatment of RSE. However, rates of successful CLB response were substantially lower than in a recently published study. Differing RSE characteristics and treatment strategies may account for the discrepancy between study results, as RSE etiologies and seizures types associated with unfavorable prognosis were more common in our cohort, while anesthetics tended to be less frequently applied to achieve seizure control.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the use of topiramate (TPM) in refractory status epilepticus (RSE)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed RSE episodes over a 12-year period. Episodes treated with and without TPM were compared in terms of demographics, RSE characteristics, clinical course, and outcome in univariate and multivariate analyses. Subgroups defined by type of RSE were studied separately. Functional outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale., Results: Among 71 episodes, 17 (23.9%) were treated with TPM and seizure control was achieved in all of these. The results of unadjusted comparisons suggested a use of TPM in younger and healthier patients who received more perseverant treatment indicated by a higher number of antiepileptic drugs applied. In multivariate analysis adjusting for RSE duration, however, these associations lost significance. Furthermore, TPM was not a predictor of successful RSE termination in neither the overall cohort, nor in the subgroup of complex-partial RSE., Conclusion: After multivariate adjustment, no significant differences were observed between episodes treated with and without TPM in baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Regarding the latter, this study does therefore not yield evidence for a particular efficacy of TPM in RSE., (Copyright © 2016 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)