Search

Background: Posaconazole is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients. Standard dosing was shown to result in adequate attainment of the prophylaxis Cmin target (0.7 mg/L) but not of the treatment Cmin target (1.0 mg/L)., Objectives: To provide an optimized posaconazole dosing regimen for IV treatment of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in the ICU., Methods: A population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model was developed using data from the POSA-FLU PK substudy (NCT03378479). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess treatment Cmin and AUC0-24 PTA. PTA ≥90% was deemed clinically acceptable. PopPK modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM 7.5., Results: Thirty-one patients with intensive PK sampling were included in the PK substudy, contributing 532 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The popPK of IV posaconazole was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Interindividual variability was estimated on clearance and volume of distribution in central and peripheral compartments. Posaconazole peripheral volume of distribution increased with bodyweight. An optimized loading regimen of 300 mg q12h and 300 mg q8h in the first two treatment days achieved acceptable PTA by Day 3 in patients <100 kg and ≥100 kg, respectively. A maintenance regimen of 400 mg q24h ensured ≥90% Cmin PTA, whereas the standard 300 mg q24h was sufficient to achieve the AUC0-24 target throughout 14 days, irrespective of bodyweight., Conclusions: We have defined a convenient, optimized IV posaconazole dosing regimen that was predicted to attain the treatment target in critically ill patients with invasive aspergillosis., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objective: Posaconazole is a pharmacotherapeutic pillar for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases. Dose individualization is of utmost importance as achieving adequate antifungal exposure is associated with improved outcome. This study aimed to select and evaluate a model-informed precision dosing strategy for posaconazole., Methods: Available population pharmacokinetic models for posaconazole administered as a solid oral tablet were extracted from the literature and evaluated using data from a previously published prospective study combined with data collected during routine clinical practice. External evaluation and selection of the most accurate and precise model was based on graphical goodness-of-fit and predictive performance. Measures for bias and imprecision included mean percentage error (MPE) and normalized relative root mean squared error (NRMSE), respectively. Subsequently, the best-performing model was evaluated for its a posteriori fit-for-purpose and its suitability in a limited sampling strategy., Results: Seven posaconazole models were evaluated using 764 posaconazole plasma concentrations from 143 patients. Multiple models showed adequate predictive performance illustrated by acceptable goodness-of-fit and MPE and NRMSE below ± 10% and ± 25%, respectively. In the fit-for-purpose analysis, the selected model showed adequate a posteriori predictive performance. Bias and imprecision were lowest in the presence of two prior measurements. Additionally, this model showed to be useful in a limited sampling strategy as it adequately predicted total posaconazole exposure from one (non-)trough concentration., Conclusion: We validated an MIPD strategy for posaconazole for its fit-for-purpose. Thereby, this study is an important first step towards MIPD-supported posaconazole dosage optimization with the goal to improve antifungal treatment in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is a broad-spectrum antifungal drug. Little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to document the PK of L-AmB in this population. It was also explored if covariates may be identified that influence its exposure. All adult, critically ill patients (at the intensive care unit or hematology ward) treated with L-AmB between October 2016 and January 2020 were eligible for this study. The administered dose was left at the discretion of the treating clinician. Plasma samples were collected at predose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h postdose at an early (day 2-3) and/or later (≥ day 6) treatment day. Additionally, daily trough concentrations were collected until day 14. Of 33 included patients, 31 were evaluable; their median [IQR] age and body weight was 59 [54-64] years and 68 [59-77] kg, respectively. L-AmB was administered at doses between 2.7 mg/kg and 12.3 mg/kg, with a median [IQR] trough concentration of 3.1 [2.0-4.7] mg/l. The overall median area under the 24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were 169.0 [117.0-253.0] mg h/l and 23.2 [16.9-33.7] mg/l, respectively. A considerable intra- and interpatient PK variability for Cmax and AUC0-24 was observed but no explaining variables, except the administered dose, could be identified. The PK of L-AmB in critically ill patients was documented. A considerable variability in exposure was observed between and within patients; however, it was not associated with a multitude of patient-related characteristics., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology.)

Background: Posaconazole oral suspension emerged as a promising candidate for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. Its pharmacodynamic advantages include a broad-spectrum activity and a favorable safety profile; however, they are overshadowed by its large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, which might cause subtherapeutic exposure. The aim of this study was to develop a population (pop) PK model based on rich sampling data to better understand the PK of posaconazole oral suspension in pediatric patients., Methods: Data were obtained from a prospective interventional study involving hospitalized pediatric patients with a hematologic malignancy and prophylactically treated with posaconazole oral suspension. After constructing the popPK model, the probability of target attainment (PTA; 100% T ≥ 0.7 mg/L) for prophylaxis under fixed, body weight-based, and body surface area-based dosing was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation., Results: Fourteen patients contributed 112 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The PK of posaconazole was adequately described by a 1-compartment model with lag time 2.71 hours [13%]; nonlinear bioavailability ED50 99.1 mg/m2 (fixed); first-order absorption rate constant 0.325 hour-1 [27%]; apparent volume of distribution 1150 L [34%]; and apparent clearance 15.4 L/h [24%] (∼70-kg individual). The bioavailability decreased in the presence of diarrhea and co-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The unexplained interindividual variability in posaconazole PK remained large. The PTA was <85%, irrespective of the simulated dosing strategy. Patients without diarrhea and not administered a PPI had the highest PTA (85% under the fixed 300-mg dosing 4 times per day)., Conclusions: Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during prophylactic posaconazole therapy in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to characterize the PK variability between different posaconazole formulations in this cohort., Competing Interests: I. Spriet received consultancy support and lecture fees from argenx, Pfizer, Merck, and Cidara. P. Annaert is the cofounder and co-owner of BioNotus (Niel, Belgium). R. Van Daele has received travel support from Pfizer, Inc., and Gilead Sciences. E. Dreesen received consultancy fees from argenx and Janssen (all honoraria/fees paid to the University). The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Posaconazole is an antifungal drug used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections. Severe influenza has been identified as a risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. In this population, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used as rescue therapy, although little is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of posaconazole during ECMO.Objectives: To determine the PK and target attainment of six patients treated with IV posaconazole under ECMO and to develop a population PK model that can be used to simulate the PTA.Methods: Critically ill patients treated with posaconazole and ECMO were included in this study. Plasma samples were collected at several timepoints within one dosing interval on two occasions: an early (Day 2-3) and a late (Day 4-7) sampling day. Daily trough concentrations were measured.Results: The median (IQR) AUC0-24, CL and Vd were 34.3 (28.3-37.7) mg·h/L, 8.7 (8.0-10.6) L/h and 389 (314-740) L, if calculated with non-compartmental analysis based on the observed concentrations. All measured trough concentrations were ≥0.7 mg/L and 11/16 were ≥1 mg/L, which are the haematological thresholds for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis, respectively. The targeted PTA (>90%) was attained for prophylaxis but not for treatment.Conclusions: ECMO does not appear to influence posaconazole exposure compared with haematology patients. However, some trough levels were below the lower limit for treatment. An a priori dose adjustment does not appear to be necessary but drug monitoring is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precision dosing for many antifungal drugs is now recommended. Saliva sampling is considered as a non-invasive alternative to plasma sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). However, there are currently no clinically validated saliva models available. The aim of this study is firstly, to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence supporting saliva-based TDM for azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine. The second aim is to develop a saliva population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for eligible drugs, based on the evidence. Databases were searched up to July 2019 on PubMed® and Embase®, and 14 studies were included in the systematic review for fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole. No studies were identified for isavuconazole, posaconazole, flucytosine, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin, or anidulafungin. Fluconazole and voriconazole demonstrated a good saliva penetration with an average S/P ratio of 1.21 (± 0.31) for fluconazole and 0.56 (± 0.18) for voriconazole, both with strong correlation (r = 0.89–0.98). Based on the evidence for TDM and available data, population PK analysis was performed on voriconazole using Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modeling (NONMEM 7.4). 137 voriconazole plasma and saliva concentrations from 11 patients (10 adults, 1 child) were obtained from the authors of the included study. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics was best described by one-compartment PK model with first-order absorption, parameterized by clearance of 4.56 L/h (36.9% CV), volume of distribution of 60.7 L, absorption rate constant of 0.858 (fixed), and bioavailability of 0.849. Kinetics of the voriconazole distribution from plasma to saliva was identical to the plasma kinetics, but the extent of distribution was lower, modeled by a scale factor of 0.5 (4% CV). A proportional error model best accounted for the residual variability. The visual and simulation-based model diagnostics confirmed a good predictive performance of the saliva model. The developed saliva model provides a promising framework to facilitate saliva-based precision dosing of voriconazole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]