Search

Within the last several years, the National Institutes of Health has supported three randomized clinical trials to determine whether lower than usually recommended goals for treatment of hypertension would have greater benefit for prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke. These were the ACCCORD, SPRINT, and Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) Trials. Together they enrolled 17,114 participants. Results for all three have been reported. The trials differ from each other in their inclusion criteria, target blood pressures for the lower goal (intensive treatment), but are similar in many respects. The results with regard to their primary outcome were different: not significant for ACCORD and SPS3, but definitely significant for SPRINT. Subgroup analysis revealed differences and similarities. When viewed together and with recent large observational studies, they support a conclusion that a systolic pressure in the range of 125-135 mm Hg range is likely to be optimal on treatment for most hypertensive patients., (© American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2016. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A report from panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee titled "2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults" has garnered much attention due to its major change in recommendations for hypertension treatment for patients ≥60 years of age and for their treatment goal. In response, certain groups have opposed the decision to initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower blood pressure (BP) at systolic BP ≥150 mm Hg and treat to a goal systolic BP of <150 mm Hg in the general population age ≥60 years. This paper contains 3 sections-an introduction followed by the opinions of 2 writing groups-outlining objections to or support of maintaining this proposed strategy in certain at-risk populations, namely African Americans, women, and the elderly. Several authors argue for maintaining current targets, as opposed to adopting the new recommendations, to allow for optimal treatment for older women and African Americans, helping to close sex and race/ethnicity gaps in cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Accurate measurement of arterial pressure is necessary for diagnosis of hypertension and for assessment of its therapy. The development and growing application of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) furthers these goals. Use of ABPM has defined white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH), important prognostic diagnoses. ABPM categorizes blood pressure in several ways that increase accuracy for diagnosis and prediction of cardiovascular risk. Measurements of blood pressure throughout the day, at night during sleep, during the morning surge, and, in some instances selected intervals can be especially valuable for both research and clinical management. ABPM is being explored for its value in measuring pulse pressure and a derived index of arterial stiffness. ABPM has also shown to be valuable for defining the effects of antihypertensive drugs therapy. Results of such studies are crucial for advancing antihypertensive management. This review will summarize the important and emerging role of ABPM in defining risk for cardiovascular disease.

Accurate identification of hypertension is crucial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) provides superior prediction of cardiovascular disease, compared with clinic pressures. HBPM can be a valuable resource for the effective treatment of hypertension, when combined with other modalities used to improve patient education, lifestyle enhancement, adherence to medication and reduction of unnecessary clinic visits. In some developed nations, more than half of households with a hypertensive patient have a device for HBPM. The use of HBPM by patients and the acceptance of HBPM measurements by providers is increasing. The long-term effectiveness of HBPM, combined with telemetry for disease prevention, is promising. More research is still needed to establish its full value. It is predicted that HBPM has definite potential for more effective strategies to control hypertension and reduce the need for on-site clinical care.

Many people receiving drug treatment for hypertension have had good control of their blood pressure for several years. It is feasible, and might be desirable, to discontinue drug treatment in selected groups of these patients if their long term outcome was not adversely affected. A few small series and 2 larger trials indicate that withdrawal of antihypertensive medication can be followed by 1 to 4 years of normal blood pressure, especially for those with mild hypertension (pretreatment diastolic blood pressure < 100mm Hg) and who have no evidence of target organ damage. In the 2 randomised trials of withdrawing medication emerging from the High Blood Pressure Detection and Follow-up Program, the addition of nutritional interventions (bodyweight reduction and/or dietary salt restriction) was shown to enhance the likelihood that antihypertensive drugs could be deferred for long intervals. Sustained bodyweight reduction for overweight patients with mild hypertension was the most successful approach. Short term nonpharmacological programmes have been evaluated for their economic effects on this process through cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. The available studies imply that reduced costs and decreased adverse effects associated with withdrawal of antihypertensive medication are offset by cost of the nonpharmacological interventions needed to maximise continued blood pressure control. Other influences, such as willingness to pay for nonpharmacological management or change in sense of well-being when on or off medication, need consideration for comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypertension may be attributable to various disorders involving the central or peripheral adrenergic (catecholamine) pathways. Pheochromocytoma is the best known of these disorders, but many syndromes mimic the clinical features of this tumor. In adreno-medullary hypertension, cardiovascular tissues are stimulated by activation of alpha or beta adrenergic receptors, or both. Specific diagnosis of adreno-medullary hypertension depends on careful clinical assessment and selection of sensitive and specific biochemical tests for measuring the catecholamines and their principal metabolites in urine or plasma. If such tests indicate the presence of a chromaffin cell neoplasm, accurate localization (imaging) is provided by computed axial tomography (CAT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Adreno-medullary hypertension is effectively controlled, pharmacologically, by alpha and beta receptor antagonists, which may be given intravenously for emergencies. Excess catecholamine synthesis by pheochromocytomas can be reduced by methyltyrosine. Surgical cure of pheochromocytomas can be expected in most instances, but long-term surveillance for recurrent tumors, some of which may be malignant, is needed. Chemotherapy can reduce the tumor bulk of a malignant pheochromocytoma. Recent use of molecular biology techniques may be helpful in early detection of malignant transformation.

The antihypertensive and renin-lowering efficacy and side effects of tolamolol, a beta adrenergic blocking drug with cardioselectivity, were examined in 10 patients with mild essential hypertension while on regular diet. Tolamol, at a dose of 300 to 900 mg per day, given over a period of 2 to 4 wk significantly decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures in both the recumbent and standing positions. Normal blood pressure (140/90 mm Hg or less) was attained in 8 subjects. Mean heart rate and ambulatory midday plasma renin activity (PRA) decreased significantly; however, there was no significant correlation between blood pressure decrease and either the pretreatment PRA or decrease in PRA. Body weight did not change significantly. No adverse side effects were detected and no changes in the liver or renal function or in the blood count were observed. It is concluded that tolamolol is effective in lowering blood pressure and PRA in patients with hypertension.