Search

Purpose: Vasomotor hot flashes are a common problem in menopausal women. Given concerns regarding estrogen and/or combined hormonal therapy, other treatment options are desired. Prior trials have confirmed that progestational agents and newer antidepressants effectively reduce hot flashes. This current trial compared a single intramuscular dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), depot preparation, versus daily oral venlafaxine as treatment for hot flashes., Methods: Women with bothersome hot flashes were entered onto this trial, were randomly assigned to treatment, and then had a baseline week where hot flash scores were recorded without treatment. They were then treated and observed for 6 weeks; daily diaries were used to measure hot flash frequencies and severities. There were 109 patients per each arm randomly assigned to receive MPA 400 mg intramuscularly for a single dose versus venlafaxine 37.5 mg per day for a week, then 75 mg per day., Results: During the sixth week after random assignment, hot flash scores were reduced by 55% in the venlafaxine arm versus 79% in the MPA arm (P < .0001). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 46% of venlafaxine patients (50 of 109) compared with 74% of the MPA patients (81 of 109) had a decrease in hot flashes by more than 50% from baseline (P < .0001). Less toxicity was reported in the MPA arm., Conclusion: A single MPA dose seems to be well tolerated and more effectively reduces hot flashes than does venlafaxine.

There continues to be a need for new systemic approaches for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor activity of the somatostatin analogue octreotide to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in a Phase III setting. Eighty-four patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and limited tumor volume were randomized to receive octreotide 200 microg three times daily or 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin. After the first 12 patients had been randomized to octreotide, we increased the dose in the remaining patients to 500 microg three times daily. This change was based on early reports in other studies, suggesting that our original dose may not have been effective and that higher doses of octreotide were well tolerated. A planned interim analysis performed after 84 patients were enrolled demonstrated inferior time to progression and survival for the patients randomized to octreotide. Further accrual to the octreotide arm of this protocol was therefore terminated. Octreotide in doses of 200-500 microg three times daily does not delay progression or extend survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer compared with treatment with 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin.

The goals of this clinical trial involving postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were to: (a) examine the effects of letrozole on tamoxifen (TAM) pharmacokinetics; (b) examine estrogen suppression in patients receiving TAM plus letrozole; and (c) evaluate tolerability, toxicity, objective response, and time to progression for the combination. Postmenopausal women with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer received TAM (20 mg daily) for 6 weeks, and then letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was added. To examine for any effect of letrozole on the levels of TAM and two metabolites [N-desmethyl-TAM and 4-hydroxy-TAM], serum samples were obtained at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. To examine for aromatase inhibition, serum samples were obtained before treatment and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks for estradiol, estrone (E1) E1 sulfate, and sex hormone-binding globulin. A total of 34 patients were entered on this trial, and 23 patients were still on study at week 24, 18 of whom had blood samples available at both week 6 and week 24. The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between levels at week 24 and levels at week 6 was -34 to 15 ng/ml for TAM, -35 to 45 ng/ml for N-desmethyl-TAM, and -1 to 2 for 4-hydroxy-TAM. For estradiol, a significant decrease (median, 88.5%; range, 73.7-95.2%) was identified after 6 weeks of letrozole, which was maintained for an additional 12 weeks. Similar significant reductions were identified for E1. E1 sulfate levels increased after 6 weeks of TAM alone but then decreased significantly after the addition of letrozole. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were significantly elevated after 6 weeks of TAM alone and remained elevated after the addition of letrozole. Six of the 34 patients (17.6%) achieved an objective response (95% confidence interval, 6.8-34.5%), with a median time to disease progression of 7.6 months. There was no indication of a systematic decrease in TAM, N-desmethyl-TAM, or 4-hydroxy-TAM after the additional of letrozole. Estrogen suppression induced by letrozole was substantial despite the concomitant administration of TAM. The antitumor effect of TAM plus letrozole was less than expected.

Background: Tamoxifen (TAM) is generally considered the hormonal agent of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast carcinoma. The somatostatin analogues, including octreotide, have demonstrated inhibition of breast carcinoma cell lines and multiple endocrinologic actions, including reduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent mitogen for breast carcinoma cells. In an attempt to improve the efficacy of TAM, this randomized trial was performed., Methods: One hundred thirty-five eligible postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma were randomized to TAM (10 mg twice daily) alone or combined with octreotide 150 microg (administered subcutaneously thrice daily). The two groups were well balanced, except the TAM group had higher proportions of patients with visceral disease (50% vs. 37%) and a disease free interval longer than 5 years (47% vs. 34%). A cohort of 18 patients was evaluated for the impact of treatment on serum IGF-I, free IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 levels, and total IGF binding capacity., Results: The median time to progression was estimated to be 14.2 months with TAM and 10.3 months with TAM plus octreotide. The distribution of progression free survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.26), and the progression hazard ratio (TAM/TAM + octreotide) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.17). The distribution of survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.92), and the death hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.62-1.55). When the 106 patients with measurable or evaluable disease were considered, the objective response rate was 49% with TAM alone and 43% with TAM plus octreotide (P = 0.70). Patients who received TAM plus octreotide had higher incidences of nausea, diarrhea, and steatorrhea. The percentage of decline in serum IGF-I, from pretreatment levels to those following 3-6 weeks of treatment, was significantly greater (P < 0.01) with TAM plus octreotide than with TAM alone., Conclusions: There is no indication that the combination of TAM plus octreotide as administered in this study is substantially more efficacious than TAM alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma. The limited cohort included in IGF-I studies suggests that TAM plus octreotide produces a significantly greater reduction in serum IGF-I levels.

The authors conducted a phase II study of somatostatin analogue in 18 patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (four with previous treatment, 14 without previous treatment). Patients received 2,000 mg subcutaneously thrice daily. They were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2 and acceptable pretreatment biochemical parameters. No patient responded to treatment. The median time to progression was 44 days. The median survival was 106 days. Toxicity related to treatment consisted of mild diarrhea and anorexia. Somatostatin analogue is not active as a single agent in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To compare failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy., Patients and Methods: Between August 1, 1987 and July 15, 1995 138 (136 eligible) premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive metastatic breast cancer were entered by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Prior chemotherapy or hormone therapy for metastatic disease was not allowed. Patients were randomly assigned to goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks; (n = 69) versus surgical ovariectomy (n = 67). The study was initially designed as an equivalence trial with 80% power to rule out a 50% improvement in survival due to ovariectomy. However, accrual was slow and the study was terminated early, which resulted in a final power of 60% for the alternative hypothesis of equal survival distributions., Results: FFS and OS were similar for goserelin and ovariectomy. The goserelin/ovariectomy death hazards ratio was .80 and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) was .53 to 1.20. The test of 50% improvement in survival due to ovariectomy was rejected at P = .006. Goserelin lowered serum estradiol to postmenopausal levels. Hot flashes (75% v 46%) and tumor flare (16% v 3%) were more common with goserelin., Conclusion: Goserelin and ovariectomy resulted in similar FFS and OS. We can rule out a moderate advantage for ovariectomy. Goserelin was safe and well tolerated.

Background: It is common practice to utilize a series of different hormonal agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women who, despite disease progression, continue to be candidates for hormonal therapy on a clinical basis. Letrozole is a new highly selective and potent aromatase inhibitor. There are limited data on third-line hormonal therapy in general, and this study was undertaken to evaluate letrozole in this context., Methods: A randomized trial involving two independent Phase II trials of two letrozole dosage levels, 0.5 mg and 2.5 mg per day, was performed. Eligibility requirements included failure on two prior hormonal therapies and measurable or evaluable disease., Results: Ninety-one patients, 46 receiving 0.5 mg and 45 receiving 2.5 mg of letrozole per day, were assessable for response. At the lower dose, 9 patients (20%) achieved an objective response; 6 patients (13%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. At the higher dose, 10 patients (22%) achieved a response; 8 patients (18%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. The median times to progression were 97 days for the lower dose and 154 days for the higher dose. Toxicity was considered acceptable., Conclusions: Letrozole has definite antitumor activity as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma at doses of 0.5 and 2.5 mg per day. It is an effective and generally well-tolerated hormonal agent.

Background: Information regarding prognostic factors and survival in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen is limited., Methods: The data from 4 prospective clinical trials were analyzed, including information on 396 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. Emphasis was placed on 184 elderly patients (age greater than 65 years) to characterize the response to therapy, time to progression TTP), overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and treatment-related toxicity., Results: Among 363 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, the objective response rates were higher in the elderly patients (46% versus 33%, P = 0.06); but age did not achieve significance in a logistic regression analysis (P= 0. 1). The median TTP (10.5 months versus 6.2 months, log rank P = 0.002) and OS (35.7 months versus 28.8 months, log rank P = 0.02) were superior in the elderly cohort. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis approached statistical significance (P = 0.055) for TTP but was not significant for OS (P = 0.17). Among elderly patients, disease free interval (DFI) (greater than 5 years), dominant disease site (soft tissue), prior adjuvant chemotherapy, positive estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) and performance status (PS) were independent prognostic factors. Hot flashes were common in both younger and older cohorts (25% versus 33%, P = 0.14), while anorexia (14% versus 22%, P = 0.04) and mood changes (2% versus 6%, P = 0.03) were more common in the elderly patients., Conclusions: There was no indication that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have a poorer outcome with regard to response rate, TTP or OS; in fact, they appeared to have a slightly better prognosis although this was not significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors. In elderly patients, DFI, PS, positive ER or PGR, and dominant disease site are independent prognostic factors.

Purpose: To perform a randomized three-arm comparison of tamoxifen (TAM; 20 mg/d) and two separate doses of toremifene (TOR; 60 mg/d [TOR60] and 200 mg/d [TOR200]) in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer., Materials and Methods: Six hundred forty-eight patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive TAM (n = 215), TOR60 (n = 221), or TOR200 (n = 212)., Results: The combined response rates (by intent to treat) were as follows;: TAM, 44%; TOR60, 50%; and TOR200, 48%. Complete and partial response rates were as follows: TAM, 19%; TOR60, 21%, and TOR200, 23% (not statistically different). Median times to progression and overall survival were not significantly different. Adverse events (lethal, serious but nonlethal, and important but non-life-threatening) were similar in all three arms, except that patients in the TOR200 arm had a statistically significantly increased rate of nausea (37% v 26% and 26% for TOR200, TAM, and TOR60, respectively; P = .027). Quality-of-life assessments were not different among the three arms., Conclusion: The activity, toxicity, and side effects of TOR in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer are similar if not equivalent to those of TAM. We detected no clear evidence of a dose-response effect for TOR. TOR60 is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and can be considered an alternative to TAM as first-line treatment for such patients.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine by randomized, controlled, double-blind evaluation whether therapy with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, would delay tumor progression and improve survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas who were ambulatory with no significant symptoms., Methods: Two hundred sixty patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and without symptoms related to colon cancer were randomized to receive 150 micrograms of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily or, initially, no treatment. After 91 patients were entered in the double-blind study, saline placebo injections were used for patients in the control arm., Results: The randomization culminated in balanced assignment of patients with respect to disease site(s), presence or absence of measurable or evaluable disease, and interval from diagnosis of metastasis to protocol entry. Steatorrhea and diarrhea, usually mildly severe, resulted more often from treatment than from the placebo. The major end points were time to progression and survival. Curves for both parameters overlapped in the blind and open trial segments., Conclusion: Octreotide at a dose of 150 micrograms given three times daily is not effective therapy for patients with advanced asymptomatic colon carcinoma.