Search

Aim: Chemotherapy results in permanent loss of ovarian function in some premenopausal women. Accurate identification in women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer (eBC) would allow optimisation of subsequent endocrine treatment. We sought to assess whether analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) using a sensitive automated assay could identify women who would not regain ovarian function after chemotherapy., Methods: Data from women in the Ovarian Protection Trial in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients (OPTION) trial of goserelin (a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue) for ovarian protection were analysed. Women were assessed for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI: amenorrhoea with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)) at 24 months after diagnosis. The accuracy of AMH for the diagnosis of POI and its prediction from measurement at the end of chemotherapy was calculated., Results: AMH below the level of detection showed good diagnostic accuracy for POI at 24 months (n = 73) with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity 1.0 and specificity 0.73 at the assay limit of detection. In women aged >40 at diagnosis who did not receive goserelin, AMH measured at end of chemotherapy also gave good prediction of POI at 24 months (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89 95% CI 0.75-1.0, n = 32), with sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.82, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 42.8. FSH gave slightly lower AUC, and specificity was low at 0.55. Age but not tamoxifen impacted on AMH levels., Conclusion: Using this sensitive AMH assay, the finding of an undetectable AMH level in women aged >40 at the end of chemotherapy for eBC gave a good prediction that ovarian function would not return. This may allow alterations in post-chemotherapy endocrine management., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) impacts fertility and other aspects of women's health. The OPTION trial tested whether administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during chemotherapy for early breast cancer reduced the risk of POI., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group study of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin administered before and during chemotherapy for breast cancer with stage I-IIIB disease. The primary outcome was amenorrhoea between 12 and 24 months after randomization, supported by elevated follicle stimulating hormone concentrations to give an additional analysis as rate of POI., Results: A total of 227 patients were randomized and the primary analysis was conducted on 202 patients. Goserelin reduced the prevalence of amenorrhoea between 12 and 24 months to 22% versus 38% in the control group (P = 0.015) and the prevalence of POI to 18.5% versus 34.8% in the control group (P = 0.048). Follicle stimulating hormone concentrations were also lower in all women treated with goserelin at both 12 and 24 months (P = 0.027, P = 0.001, respectively). The effect of goserelin was not statistically significant in women >40 years. Assessment of the ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone showed a marked fall in both groups during treatment to median values of 5% of pretreatment levels in the control group and 7% in the goserelin group, which were not significantly different between groups., Conclusion: This study shows that goserelin reduced the risk of POI in women treated with chemotherapy for early breast cancer, with particular efficacy in women aged ≤40 years old. The degree of ovarian protection also seems limited and the clinical significance for fertility and longer term prevention of estrogen deficiency-related outcomes needs to be determined., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Myelosuppression is common in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. Radium-223 prolongs overall survival in these patients but may cause myelosuppression; understanding risk factors will improve clinical decision making. We describe hematologic safety of radium-223 in ALSYMPCA and post hoc analyses identifying patients at increased risk for hematologic toxicity., Patients and Methods: Hematologic parameters and adverse events were analyzed. Multivariate analyses assessing baseline risk factors for hematologic toxicities were performed separately for radium-223 and placebo patients., Results: Nine hundred one patients received radium-223 (n = 600) or placebo (n = 301); 65% of radium-223 and 48% of placebo patients had the full 6 cycles. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was more common in radium-223 versus placebo patients (6% vs. 2%). Logistic regression analyses identified significant baseline predictors for grade 2-4 hematologic toxicities related to radium-223 treatment: extent of disease (6-20 vs. < 6 bone metastases; odds ratio [OR] = 2.76; P = .022) and elevated prostate-specific antigen (OR = 1.65; P = .006) for anemia; prior docetaxel (OR = 2.16; P = .035), decreased hemoglobin (OR = 1.35; P = .008), and decreased platelets (OR = 1.44; P = .030) for thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia events were too few in placebo patients for a comparative analysis. There were no significant associations between hematologic toxicities and number of radium-223 injections received (4-6 vs. 1-3)., Conclusion: Radium-223 has a favorable safety profile with a low myelosuppression incidence. Understanding baseline factors associated with myelosuppression may assist clinicians in avoiding severe myelosuppression events with radium-223., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) commonly occur in patients with bone metastases, often leading to hospitalisations and decreased quality-of-life. In the ALSYMPCA trial, radium-223 significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.83, P < 0.001) and prolonged time to first SSE (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83, P = 0.00037) and subsequent SSE (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.83, P = 0.00039) versus placebo in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. Health care resource use (HCRU), including hospitalisation events and days, were prospectively collected in ALSYMPCA. We assessed health care resource use for the first 12 months post-randomisation. Significantly fewer radium-223 (218/589; 37.0%) versus placebo patients (133/292; 45.5%) had at least one hospitalisation event (P = 0.016). However, mean number of hospitalisation events per patient was similar (radium-223 0.69 versus placebo 0.79, P = 0.226), likely due to the significantly longer follow-up time for radium-223 (7.82 months versus 6.92 months for placebo; P < 0.001). There were significantly fewer hospitalisation days per patient for radium-223 (4.44 versus 6.68, respectively, P = 0.004). The reduction in hospitalisation days with radium-223 was observed both before first SSE (2.35 days versus 3.36 days, respectively) and after SSE (7.74 days versus 9.19 days, respectively). Our data suggest that this reduced hospital days along with the survival benefit and reduction in time to SSEs with radium-223 treatment may contribute to improvements in health-related quality-of-life in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases (ALSYMPCA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699751.)., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with second-line chemotherapy for methotrexate-resistant low-risk GTN at the Sheffield Centre, UK between 2001 and 2015, including the novel use of single-agent carboplatin as a strategy to reduce exposure to combination chemotherapy., Methods: 392 low-risk GTN patients were treated with first-line methotrexate. The selection of chemotherapy regimen following methotrexate-resistance depended on the volume of residual disease as indicated by the serum hCG value at the time, with patients switching to either single-agent dactinomycin at an hCG level<150IU/L from 2001-2010 and <300IU/L since 2010, or to combination treatment with etoposide/dactinomycin (EA) above these thresholds. In order to reduce exposure to more toxic combination chemotherapy regimens, our treatment policy was revised in 2011, with the recommendation of single-agent carboplatin as an alternative to EA at hCG levels >300IU/L., Results: 136 (35%) of 392 received second-line chemotherapy following methotrexate-resistance. 59 patients received single-agent dactinomycin with 53 (90%) patients achieving complete hCG response, 3 patients requiring combination chemotherapy or surgery, and 3 patients subsequently spontaneously resolving. 56 patients received EA chemotherapy with hCG complete response in 50 (89%) patients, and the remaining 6 patients were cured with further multi-agent chemotherapy or surgery. With carboplatin, 17/21 (81%) achieved an overall complete hCG response rate, with 4 patients requiring third-line EA. Carboplatin was well tolerated with no significant alopecia; myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity. Overall survival for all patients was 100%., Conclusion: These data show the continued excellent outcomes for methotrexate-resistant low-risk patients treated with single-agent dactinomycin or EA. Our experience with carboplatin is promising and provides an alternative regimen for methotrexate-resistant low-risk disease that avoids alopecia and in-patient treatment., (Crown Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radium-223 prolongs overall survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and symptomatic bone metastases, regardless of prior docetaxel. Whether or not chemotherapy can be safely administered following radium-223 treatment is of clinical importance. An exploratory analysis of prospectively collected data, from the ALSYMPCA (ALpharadin in SYMptomatic Prostate CAncer) patient subgroup who received chemotherapy after radium-223 or placebo treatment, was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy following radium-223., Methods: In ALSYMPCA, CRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and no visceral metastases were randomized 2:1 to receive six injections of radium-223 (50 kBq/kg IV) or placebo plus best standard of care, stratified by prior docetaxel, baseline alkaline phosphatase, and current bisphosphonate use. In this exploratory analysis, chemotherapy agents administered following study treatment were identified; timing and duration were calculated. Hematologic safety was reviewed, and overall survival analyzed., Results: Overall, 142 radium-223 and 64 placebo patients received subsequent chemotherapy; most common were docetaxel (70% radium-223, 72% placebo) and mitoxantrone (16% radium-223, 20% placebo). The majority of patients (61% radium-223, 58% placebo) had received prior docetaxel. Radium-223 patients started subsequent chemotherapy later than placebo patients; chemotherapy duration was similar between groups. In radium-223 and placebo patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy, median hematologic values (hemoglobin, neutrophils, and platelets) remained nearly constant up to 18 months following start of chemotherapy, regardless of prior docetaxel treatment. A low percentage of patients in both groups had grades 3-4 hematologic values (<10%). Platelet count decline, from last measurement before chemotherapy, was numerically greater in radium-223 versus placebo patients. Median overall survivals from start of chemotherapy were 16.0 and 15.8 months following radium-223 and placebo, respectively., Conclusions: Chemotherapy following radium-223, regardless of prior docetaxel, is feasible and appears to be well tolerated in patients with CRPC and symptomatic bone metastases. Prostate 76:905-916, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Bisphosphonates have been studied in randomised trials in early breast cancer to investigate their ability to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and reduce the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis. Treatment benefits have been reported but bisphosphonates do not currently have regulatory approval for either of these potential indications. This consensus paper provides a review of the evidence and offers guidance to breast cancer clinicians on the use of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer. Using the nominal group methodology for consensus, a systematic review of the literature was augmented by a workshop held in October 2014 for breast cancer and bone specialists to present and debate the available pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. This was followed by a questionnaire to all members of the writing committee to identify areas of consensus. The panel recommended that bisphosphonates should be considered as part of routine clinical practice for the prevention of CTIBL in all patients with a T score of <-2.0 or ≥2 clinical risk factors for fracture. Compelling evidence from a meta-analysis of trial data of >18,000 patients supports clinically significant benefits of bisphosphonates on the development of bone metastases and breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women or those receiving ovarian suppression therapy. Therefore, the panel recommends that bisphosphonates (either intravenous zoledronic acid or oral clodronate) are considered as part of the adjuvant breast cancer treatment in this population and the potential benefits and risks discussed with relevant patients., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

We designed a mathematical model to describe and quantify the mechanisms and dynamics of tumor growth, cell-kill and resistance as they affect durations of benefit after cancer treatment. Our aim was to explore how treatment efficacy may be related to primary tumor characteristics, with the potential to guide future trial design and appropriate selection of therapy. Assuming a log-normal distribution of both resistant disease and tumor doubling times generates disease-free survival (DFS) or invasive DFS curves with specific shapes. Using a multivariate mathematical model, both treatment and tumor characteristics are related to quantified resistant disease and tumor regrowth rates by allowing different mean values for the influence of different treatments or clinical subtypes on these two log-normal distributions. Application of the model to the CALGB 9741 adjuvant breast cancer trial showed that dose-dense therapy was estimated to achieve an extra 3/4 log of cell-kill compared to standard therapy, but only in patients with more rapidly growing ER-negative tumors. Application of the model to the AZURE trial of adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment suggested that the 5-year duration of zoledronic acid was adequate for ER-negative tumors, but may not be so for ER-positive cases, with increased recurrences after ceasing the intervention. Mathematical models can identify different effects of treatment by subgroup and may aid in treatment design, trial analysis, and appropriate selection of therapy. They may provide a more appropriate and insightful tool than the conventional Cox model for the statistical analysis of response durations.

Background: Neo-adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials of zoledronic acid (ZOL) have shown that patients with oestrogen negative (ER-ve) tumours have improved disease outcomes. We investigated the molecular mechanism behind this differential anti-tumour effect according to ER status, hypothesising it may in part be mediated via the activin signaling pathway., Methods: The effects of activin A, its inhibitor follistatin and zoledronic acid on proliferation of breast cancer cells was evaluated using either an MTS proliferation assay or trypan blue. Secretion of activin A and follistatin in conditioned medium (CM) from MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, MCF7 and T47D cell lines were measured using specific ELISAs. The effects of ZOL on phosphorylation domains of Smad2 (pSmad2c + pSmad2L) were evaluated using immunofluorescence. Changes seen in vitro were confirmed in a ZOL treated subcutaneous ER-ve MDA-MB-436 xenograft model., Results: Activin A inhibits proliferation of both ER-ve and oestrogen positive (ER + ve) breast cancer cells, an effect impaired by follistatin. ZOL significantly inhibits proliferation and the secretion of follistatin from ER-ve cells only, which increases the biological activity of the canonical activin A pathway by significantly increasing intracellular pSmad2c and decreasing nuclear accumulation of pSmad2L. In vivo, ZOL significantly decreases follistatin and pSmad2L expression in ER-ve subcutaneous xenografts compared to saline treated control animals., Conclusions: This is the first report showing a differential effect of ZOL, according to ER status, on the activin pathway and its inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. These data suggest a potential molecular mechanism contributing to the differential anti-tumour effects reported from clinical trials and requires further evaluation in clinical samples.

The survival prospects for many patients with cancer are steadily improving. As a result, survivorship issues are of increasing importance as attempts are made to minimize the long-term adverse effects of cancer treatments. Cancer therapies can adversely affect bone health, particularly in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer. Strategies for screening patients at increased risk for fragility fracture, and treatment algorithms using both bone-targeted treatments and other therapeutic interventions, are being developed. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab have been evaluated as treatments to prevent or reverse the bone loss associated with cancer treatments. Zoledronic acid is the most extensively assessed agent and has been shown to prevent bone loss in patients with breast cancer experiencing a premature menopause, in postmenopausal women receiving an aromatase inhibitor and in patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). To date, the improvements in bone mineral density have not translated into a reduced fracture rate. However, in a large phase III trial, denosumab has been shown to reduce vertebral fractures in men receiving ADT for prostate cancer. These bone-targeted treatments have also been shown to modify the course of the underlying cancer and prevent metastasis, although the beneficial effects are confined to patients with low levels of circulating reproductive hormones.

Purpose: Survival is highly variable in women with bone metastases from breast cancer and prognostic factors are needed. We analyzed data from a phase III trial comparing zoledronic acid (ZOL) with pamidronate in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases to identify variables prognostic for overall survival., Experimental Design: Patients who received ZOL (n = 435) with bone marker assessments and complete baseline data were included. Relative risks (RR) of death over 24 months were assessed using a stratified Cox regression analysis. A reduced model was generated using stepwise backward elimination until only significant (P < 0.05) variables remained., Results: Only 5 of 19 variables analyzed remained significantly prognostic for survival in the reduced multivariate model. These included age more than 50 years (RR 1.78-2.53, P ≤ 0.01 for each decade >50 versus ≤ 50); Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score less than 65 units (P < 0.05 vs. ≥ 75 units); impaired (PS ≥ 1) versus fully active (PS = 0) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (RR 1.74, P < 0.01); prior versus no prior chemotherapy (RR 1.97; P < 0.01), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Lactate dehydrogenase ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) but < 2 × ULN correlated with a two-fold increased risk of death, and LDH > 2 × ULN correlated with a six-fold increased risk of death versus LDH < ULN (P < 0.0001 for both). Baseline bone marker levels were not significantly correlated with survival after adjustment for other significant covariates., Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that LDH levels correlate strongly with survival in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer and confirms the relevance of previously described prognostic factors., (©2012 AACR.)

Current clinical treatment guidelines recommend cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or both (with targeted therapy if indicated) for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer, depending on the biologic characteristics of the primary tumor. Some of these therapies can induce premature menopause or are specifically designed to suppress ovarian function and reduce circulating estrogen levels. In addition to bone loss associated with low estrogen levels, cytotoxic chemotherapy may have a direct negative effect on bone metabolism. As a result, cancer treatment-induced bone loss poses a significant threat to bone health in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Clinical trials of antiresorptive therapies, such as bisphosphonates, have demonstrated the ability to slow or prevent bone loss in this setting. Current fracture risk assessment tools are based on data from healthy postmenopausal women and do not adequately address the risks associated with breast cancer therapy, especially in younger premenopausal women. We therefore recommend that all premenopausal women with breast cancer be informed about the potential risk of bone loss prior to beginning anticancer therapy. Women who experience amenorrhea should have bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and receive regular follow-up to monitor bone health. Regular exercise and daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation are recommended. Women with a Z-score <-2.0 or Z-score ≤-1.0 and/or a 5-10% annual decrease in bone mineral density should be considered for bisphosphonate therapy in addition to calcium and vitamin D supplements., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), an investigator-led study in 4,724 postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer has demonstrated clinically important benefits from switching adjuvant endocrine therapy after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to exemestane. Now, with longer follow-up, a large number of non-breast cancer-related events have been reported. Exploratory analyses describe breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and explore incidence and patterns of the different competing events., Patients and Methods: Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen or switch to exemestane to complete 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. At this planned analysis, the median follow-up was 91 months. Principal analysis focuses on 4,052 patients with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive and 547 with ER-unknown tumors., Results: In all, 930 BCFS events have been reported (exemestane, 423; tamoxifen, 507), giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92; P = .001) in favor of exemestane in the ER-positive/ER unknown group. Analysis partitioned at 2.5 years after random assignment showed that the on-treatment benefit of switching to exemestane (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.75; P < .001) was not lost post-treatment, but that there was no additional gain once treatment had ceased (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10; P = .60). Improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, with 352 deaths in the exemestane group versus 405 deaths in the tamoxifen group (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; P = .04). Of these, 222 were reported as intercurrent deaths (exemestane, 107; tamoxifen, 115)., Conclusion: The protective effect of switching to exemestane compared with continuing on tamoxifen on risk of relapse or death was maintained for at least 5 years post-treatment and was associated with a continuing beneficial impact on overall survival.

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD)-based guidelines for bone-directed therapy in women with early breast cancer (EBC) appear inadequate for averting fractures, particularly during aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Therefore, an algorithm was developed to better assess risk and direct treatment (Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1407-1416). Here, we provide updated guidance on pharmacologic interventions to prevent/treat aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL)., Design: Systematic literature review identified recent advances in preventing/treating AIBL. Individual agents were assessed based on trial size, design, follow-up, and safety., Results: Fracture risk factors in patients with EBC remain unchanged (Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1407-1416). The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool algorithm includes fracture risk factors plus BMD but does not adequately address AIBL effects. Several antiresorptives can prevent/treat AIBL. However, concerns regarding compliance and long-term efficacy/safety remain. Overall, evidence is strongest for twice-yearly zoledronic acid (ZOL), and recent advances support additional anticancer benefits from ZOL., Conclusions: All patients initiating AIs need advice regarding exercise, calcium/vitamin D supplements, baseline BMD monitoring (when available), and bone-directed therapy if T-score <-2.0 or at least two fracture risk factors were observed. Patients with T-score > -2.0 and no risk factors should be managed based on BMD loss during years 1-2. Unsatisfactory compliance/decreasing BMD after 12-24 months on oral bisphosphonates should trigger a switch to i.v. bisphosphonate.

Background: 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (PET) and gallium-67 citrate (gallium) response after chemotherapy are powerful prognostic factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, clinical outcomes when consolidation radiation therapy (RT) is administered are less defined., Patients and Methods: We reviewed 99 patients diagnosed with DLBCL from 1996 to 2007 at Duke University who had a post-chemotherapy response assessment with either PET or gallium and who subsequently received consolidation RT. Clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test., Results: Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Stage distribution was I-II in 70% and III-IV in 30%. Chemotherapy was R-CHOP or CHOP in 88%. Median RT dose was 30 Gy. Post-chemotherapy PET (n = 79) or gallium (n = 20) was positive in 21 of 99 patients and negative in 78 of 99 patients. Five-year in-field control was 95% with a negative PET/gallium scan versus 71% with a positive scan (P < 0.01). Five-year event-free survival (EFS; 83% versus 65%, P = 0.04) and overall survival (89% versus 73%, P = 0.04) were also significantly better when the post-chemotherapy PET/gallium was negative., Conclusions: A positive PET/gallium scan after chemotherapy is associated with an increased risk of local failure and death. Consolidation RT, however, still results in long-term EFS in 65% of patients.

The adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer is associated with adverse effects on bone health. We previously reported a decline in bone mineral density (BMD) following the switch from tamoxifen to exemestane in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES). Here we report effects of endocrine treatment withdrawal on BMD, bone turnover markers (BTM) and fracture rates. 4,724 patients took part in IES, and 206 patients were included in a bone sub-study. BMD and BTM were assessed pre-randomization, during and after the end of treatment (EOT). To evaluate treatment withdrawal effects, 12- and 24-month post EOT BMD results are available for 122 and 126 patients, respectively. Similar patient numbers had BTM measured post EOT. Following treatment withdrawal, the differences in BMD observed between the two endocrine strategies were partially reversed. At 24 months from EOT, spine BMD increased by 1.53% (95%CI 0.63-2.43; p = 0.001) after stopping exemestane and fell by 1.93% (95%CI -2.91 to 0.95; p = 0.0002) following tamoxifen withdrawal. A similar pattern of changes was observed at the hip. At 2 years post EOT, BMD changes from baseline were similar with both treatment strategies. Corresponding inverse changes in BTM were seen, with an increase following tamoxifen withdrawal and a reduction after exemestane. A higher number of fractures occurred during exemestane treatment, but fracture rates were similar after treatment withdrawal. With the switch strategy used in IES, the on treatment adverse bone effects of exemestane are reversed. Ongoing monitoring of BMD is therefore not routinely required.

Trastuzumab delivery and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in 110 patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab in routine practice are investigated. The potential impact of new, less stringent UK cardiac monitoring guidelines is examined. 86 patients (78%) completed trastuzumab on schedule. 11 (10%) completed treatment despite delay(s) to allow LVEF recovery, 7 (6%) discontinued trastuzumab because of insufficient LVEF recovery, 2 (2%) of whom developed symptomatic cardiotoxicity. 6 (5%) discontinued trastuzumab for non-cardiac reasons. With the newer guidelines, the value of LVEF lower limit of normal is important in determining the proportion of patients who require angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and cardiology referral: up to 100% could potentially complete trastuzumab on schedule with up to 60% receiving ACEIs and 25% requiring cardiology referral. Adjuvant trastuzumab was well tolerated overall. The new guidelines potentially allow more patients to complete trastuzumab on schedule but require higher levels of cardiological intervention., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, which is increased when cancer cells invade bone, and are used in the treatment of metastatic bone disease to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events. In addition, preclinical studies have shown that bisphosphonates, especially potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, have direct anticancer actions. Anticancer activity includes induction of apoptosis, and inhibition of invasion, in addition to synergistic activity with chemotherapy agents, antiangiogenic properties, and modulating effects on the immune system. In terms of potential clinical anticancer activity, early data suggest that zoledronic acid may have a role to play in preventing metastatic disease. The definitive answer is not known as yet; however, with more than 20,000 patients with breast, prostate, or lung cancer currently participating in adjuvant bisphosphonate randomized trials, results should be available in the next few years. This will establish whether bisphosphonates given early in the course of cancer will be able to prevent formation of metastases, in or out of the bone environment. This review will focus on emerging evidence of the anticancer activities of bisphosphonates and possible underlying mechanisms of action., (2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This review of practice assessed all early breast cancer patients diagnosed over 12 months to determine the frequency of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity and trastuzumab use. The frequency of HER2 positivity in routine practice (185/1319; 14%) was less than expected. A significant proportion of patients (56/185; 30%) did not receive trastuzumab, largely due to concerns about chemotherapy tolerability., (Copyright 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Certain primary tumours including breast and prostate cancers have a particular propensity for metastasis to bone. Metastatic bone disease can have significant impact on morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Skeletal-morbidity (spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, fracture, need for radiotherapy and surgery to bone) can be effectively reduced by bisphosphonates, a class of anti-resorptive drugs. They are also effective in relieving pain from bone metastases, and may improve survival in patients with accelerated bone resorption. Additionally, there is an exciting body of evidence that suggest these drugs may have anti-tumor effects that may be exploited to prevent or delay the development of bone metastases. Reported effects include inhibition of cancer cell migration, adhesion and invasion as well as anti-angiogenic and immunomodulating effects. The pre-clinical evidence is compelling, and some recently reported randomised clinical studies go part way to support their use in clinical practice at earlier stages of the disease to prevent bone metastases. However, further results are awaited before routine clinical use in the adjuvant setting can be recommended.

Accelerated bone loss is a common clinical feature of advanced breast cancer, and anti-resorptive bisphosphonates are the current standard therapy used to reduce the number and frequency of skeletal-related complications experienced by patients. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption, acting by inducing osteoclast apoptosis and thereby preventing the development of cancer-induced bone lesions. In clinical use bisphosphonates are mainly considered to be bone-specific agents, but anti-tumour effects have been reported in a number of in vitro and in vivo studies. By combining bisphosphonates with chemotherapy agents, growth and progression of breast cancer bone metastases can be virtually eliminated in model systems. Recent clinical trials have indicated that there may be additional benefits from bisphosphonate treatment, including positive effects on recurrence and survival when added to standard endocrine therapy. Whereas the ability of bisphosphonates to reduce cancer-induced bone disease is well established, their potential direct anti-tumour effect remain controversial. Ongoing clinical trials will establish whether bisphosphonates can inhibit the development of bone metastases in high-risk breast cancer patients. This review summarizes the main studies that have investigated the effects of bisphosphonates, alone and in combination with other anti-cancer agents, using in vivo model systems of breast cancer bone metastases. We also give an overview of the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of breast cancer, including examples of key clinical trials. The potential side effects and future clinical applications of bisphosphonates will be outlined.

Background/aims: The cytotoxic agent paclitaxel and the anti-resorptive drug zoledronic acid are used in the early and advanced breast cancer setting, respectively. Both agents have been demonstrated to have anti-tumour and anti-endothelial actions. Combining paclitaxel with zoledronic acid induces a synergistic increase in apoptotic breast cancer cell death in vitro, suggesting an increased anti-tumour effect in vivo, but any specific effects on the normal microvasculature and potential side-effects of this combination remain to be established., Methods: The effects of zoledronic acid and paclitaxel were investigated, alone and in combination, on human microvascular endothelial cells in vitro, using functional assays including proliferation, migration, tubule formation and apoptosis. The in vivo effect of the drugs on the normal microvasculature was determined using the dorsal microcirculation chamber model., Results/conclusion: Zoledronic acid reduced human dermal microvascular endothelial cell (HuDMEC) proliferation, caused accumulation of cells in S phase, and inhibited migration, tube formation and Rap1a prenylation. Paclitaxel significantly inhibited tube formation and proliferation, and increased endothelial necrosis; the combination induced HuDMEC apoptosis and further enhanced the inhibition of tube formation and migration. The combination caused minimal effects on the normal microvasculature in vivo, suggesting that this potential therapeutic strategy is not associated with deleterious microvascular side-effects., (Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

There is increasing evidence of anti-tumour effects of bisphosphonates from pre-clinical studies, supporting a role for these drugs beyond their traditional use in treatment of cancer-induced bone disease. A range of model systems have been used to investigate the effects of different bisphosphonates on tumour growth, both in bone and at peripheral sites. Most of these studies conclude that bisphosphonates cause a reduction in tumour burden, but that early intervention and the use of high and/or repeated dosing is required. Successful eradication of cancer may only be achievable by targeting the tumour cells directly whilst also modifying the tumour microenvironment. In line with this, bisphosphonates are demonstrated to be particularly effective at reducing breast tumour growth when used in combination with agents that directly target cancer cells. Recent studies have shown that the effects of bisphosphonates on breast tumours are not limited to bone, and that prolonged anti-tumour effects may be achieved following their inclusion in combination therapy. This has opened the field to a new strand of bisphosphonate research, focussed on elucidating their effects on cells and components of the local, regional and distal tumour microenvironment. This review highlights the recent developments in relation to proposed anti-tumour effects of bisphosphonates reported from in vitro and in vivo models, and summarises the data from key breast cancer studies. Evidence for effects on different processes and cell types involved in cancer development and progression is discussed, and the main outstanding issues identified.

Purpose of Review: Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption that reduce the risk of skeletal complications and prevent treatment-induced bone loss. However, recent data suggest that bisphosphonate use in breast cancer may provide more than just supportive care and modify the course of the disease by disrupting the metastatic process., Recent Findings: Research in the metastatic setting is focused on refining treatment, using bone markers to identify high-risk patients and define optimal schedules, potentially leading to personalized therapy. In the prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL), a large number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates and recent guidelines have defined management strategies for CTIBL. Preclinical studies have reported direct antitumour effects of bisphosphonates, particularly in combination with chemotherapy. In the clinical setting the antitumour effect is less clear, but recent data suggest that zoledronic acid may modify the course of the disease and reduce disease recurrence., Summary: Bisphosphonates are comprehensively established in the treatment of metastatic bone disease and significantly reduce skeletal morbidity. Their role in the prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone disease is also defined. The potential antitumour and disease-modifying role of adjuvant bisphosphonates holds promise but results from ongoing studies must be awaited before this becomes standard practice.

Patients with advanced breast cancer frequently develop bone metastases, and at this stage, the disease is considered incurable. Here, we show that a 6-week course of weekly administration of doxorubicin (2 mg/kg), followed 24 hours later by the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (100microg/kg), causes substantial inhibition of MDA-MB-436 breast tumor burden in bone of immunocompromised mice, compared with administration of the single agents. Molecular analysis of tumors from animals treated sequentially with doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid showed reduced numbers of proliferating tumor cells and decreased expression of cyclins E1, B, D1, and D3 as well as cdk2 and cdk4. Tumors from the sequential treatment group also displayed increased levels of apoptosis, increased expression of bcl2-associated X protein, decreased expression of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma 2, and activation of caspase 3, 8, and 9. Zoledronic acid caused a small reduction in tumor volume, reduced tumor cell proliferation, and decreased expression of cyclins D1 and D3, compared with tumors from animals treated with saline or doxorubicin. Doxorubicin had no effect on tumor growth, cell cycle, or apoptosis in vivo, but did cause increased accumulation of a bisphosphonate in MDA-MB-436 cells in vitro, suggesting that doxorubicin may affect subsequent uptake of zoledronic acid. In support of this, accumulation of unprenylated Rap1A, a surrogate marker of zoledronic acid, was only detected in tumors following sequential treatment, and not following treatment with zoledronic acid alone. Our data are the first to show the specific molecular pathways by which sequential treatment with doxorubicin and zoledronic acid induce tumor cell apoptosis and inhibit proliferation in an in vivo model of breast tumor growth in bone.

Purpose: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases are commonly treated with chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin and zoledronic acid to control their bone disease. Sequential administration of doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid has been shown to increase tumor cell apoptosis in vitro. We have therefore investigated the antitumor effects of clinically relevant doses of these drugs in a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastasis., Experimental Design: MDA-MB-231/BO2 cells were injected via the tail vein into athymic mice. Tumor-induced osteolytic lesions were detected in all animals following X-ray analysis 18 days after tumor cell inoculation (day 18). Mice were administered saline, 100 microg/kg zoledronic acid, 2 mg/kg doxorubicin, doxorubicin and zoledronic acid simultaneously, or doxorubicin followed 24 h later by zoledronic acid. Doxorubicin-treated animals received a second injection on day 25. Tumor growth in the marrow cavity and on the outside surface of the bone was measured as well as tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation. The effects of treatments on bone were evaluated following X-ray and muCT analysis., Results: Sequential treatment with doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid caused decreased intraosseous tumor burden, which was accompanied by increased levels of tumor cell apoptosis and decreased levels of proliferation, whereas extraosseous parts of the same tumors were unaffected. Administration of zoledronic acid, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, resulted in significantly smaller tumor-induced osteolytic lesions compared with control or doxorubicin-treated animals., Conclusions: This is the first study to show that sequential treatment with clinically relevant doses of doxorubicin, followed 24 h later by zoledronic acid, reduces intraosseous but not extraosseous growth of BO2 breast tumors. Our results suggest that breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease may benefit from sequential treatment using doxorubicin and zoledronic acid.

Bone is the most common site for metastasis in cancer and is of particular clinical importance in breast and prostate cancers due to the prevalence of these diseases. Bone metastases result in considerable morbidity and complex demands on health care resources, affecting quality of life and independence over years rather than months. The bisphosphonates have been shown to reduce skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma as well as a wide range of solid tumours affecting bone by 30-50%. Quite appropriately, these agents are increasingly used alongside anticancer treatments to prevent skeletal complications and relieve bone pain. The use of bisphosphonates in early cancer is also increasingly important to prevent the adverse effects of cancer treatments on bone health. These include ovarian suppression and the use of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients and androgen deprivation therapy in those with prostate cancer. Bisphosphonate strategies, similar to those used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, have suggested that bisphosphonates are a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of treatment-induced bone loss. When compared to other cancer therapies, the frequency and severity of adverse events related to bisphosphonate therapy are generally mild and infrequent; thus, the benefits of treatment with any bisphosphonate almost always outweigh the risks. However, renal dysfunction may occasionally occur and over recent years, a new entity, bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), has been described. The incidence, clinical importance and prevention strategies to minimise the impact of this problem on patients requiring bisphosphonates is discussed.

The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and intracerebral distribution of a recombinant toxin (TP-38) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors using the intracerebral infusion technique of convection-enhanced delivery (CED). Twenty patients were enrolled and stratified for dose escalation by the presence of residual tumor from 25 to 100 ng/ml in a 40-ml infusion volume. In the last eight patients, coinfusion of (123)I-albumin was performed to monitor distribution within the brain. The MTD was not reached in this study. Dose escalation was stopped at 100 ng/ml due to inconsistent drug delivery as evidenced by imaging the coinfused (123)I-albumin. Two DLTs were seen, and both were neurologic. Median survival after TP-38 was 28 weeks (95% confidence interval, 26.5-102.8). Of 15 patients treated with residual disease, two (13.3%) demonstrated radiographic responses, including one patient with glioblastoma multiforme who had a nearly complete response and remains alive >260 weeks after therapy. Coinfusion of (123)I-albumin demonstrated that high concentrations of the infusate could be delivered >4 cm from the catheter tip. However, only 3 of 16 (19%) catheters produced intraparenchymal infusate distribution, while the majority leaked infusate into the cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Intracerebral CED of TP-38 was well tolerated and produced some durable radiographic responses at doses

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a novel drug delivery technique that uses positive infusion pressure to deliver therapeutic agents directly into the interstitial spaces of the brain. Despite the promise of CED, clinical trials have demonstrated that target-tissue anatomy and patient-specific physiology play a major role in drug distribution using this technique. In this study, we retrospectively tested the ability of a software algorithm using MR diffusion tensor imaging to predict patient-specific drug distributions by CED. A tumor-targeted cytotoxin, cintredekin besudotox (interleukin 13-PE38QQR), was coinfused with iodine 123-labeled human serum albumin (123I-HSA), in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. The spatial distribution of 123I-HSA was then compared to a drug distribution simulation provided by the software algorithm. The algorithm had a high sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (100%) for identifying the high proportion (7 of 14) of catheter trajectories that failed to deliver drug into the desired anatomical region (p = 0.021). This usually occurred when catheter trajectories crossed deep sulci, resulting in leak of the infusate into the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid space. The mean concordance of the volume of distribution at the 50% isodose level between the actual 123I-HSA distribution and simulation was 65.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.0%-79.5%), and the mean maximal inplane deviation was less than 8.5 mm (95% CI, 4.0-13.0 mm). The use of this simulation algorithm was considered clinically useful in 84.6% of catheters. Routine use of this algorithm, and its further developments, should improve prospective selection of catheter trajectories, and thereby improve the efficacy of drugs delivered by this promising technique.

Background: Tamoxifen preserves bone in postmenopausal women, but non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors accelerate bone loss and increase fracture risk. We aimed to study the effect on bone health in a subgroup of women included in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), a large randomised trial that compared the switch to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane with continuation of tamoxifen in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer., Methods: Results were analysed from 206 evaluable patients from the IES, in which postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed and completely resected unilateral breast cancer (that was oestrogen-receptor positive or of unknown status), who were disease-free after 2-3 years of treatment with tamoxifen were randomised to continue oral tamoxifen 20 mg/day or switch to oral exemestane 25 mg/day to complete a total of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint was change in bone-mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover were also analysed in this substudy, and the incidence of fractures in the entire study reported. The IES is registered on the Current Controlled Trials website ., Findings: Within 6 months of switching to exemestane, BMD was lowered by 0.051 g/cm(3) (2.7%; 95% CI 2.0-3.4; p<0.0001) at the lumbar spine and 0.025 g/cm(3) (1.4%; 0.8-1.9; p<0.0001) at the hip compared with baseline. BMD decreases were only 1.0% (0.4-1.7; p=0.002) and 0.8% (0.3-1.4; p=0.003) in year 2 at the lumbar spine and hip, respectively. No patient with BMD in the normal range at trial entry developed osteoporosis. Bone resorption and formation markers increased at all time points in women receiving exemestane (p<0.001). With a median follow-up in all IES participants (n=4274) of 58 months, 162 (7%) and 115 (5%) patients in the exemestane and tamoxifen groups, respectively, had fractures (odds ratio 1.45 [1.13-1.87]; p=0.003)., Interpretation: These results indicate that the increase in survival shown previously with the IES switch strategy is achieved at the expense of some detriment to skeletal health, so the risk-benefit ratio to women needs to be individually assessed.

Purpose: There are concerns over the late effects of cancer therapy, including accelerated bone loss leading to increased risk of osteoporosis. Treatment-related bone loss is well recognized in breast and prostate cancer, due to overt hypogonadism, but there has been little evaluation of the skeletal effects of chemotherapy alone in adults. This study assesses the extent of bone loss due to previous chemotherapy in men., Experimental Design: The bone mineral density (BMD) of men who had received previously chemotherapy with curative intent for lymphoma or testicular cancers was compared with that of an age-matched population of men from a cancer control population that had not received chemotherapy. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray scanning. Additionally, measurement of sex hormones and the bone turnover markers N-telopeptide fragment of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were done. All statistical tests were two sided., Results: One hundred fifteen chemotherapy-treated patients and 102 cancer controls were recruited. There was no statistical difference in BMD between the chemotherapy and control groups at either spine or hip and the mean BMD values in both groups were no lower than that of a reference population. There were no significant differences in estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone, but follicle-stimulating hormone values were significantly higher in the chemotherapy group (P=0.011). The mean values of NH2-terminal telopeptide fragment of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were within the reference ranges., Conclusions: The absence of accelerated bone loss following chemotherapy is reassuring and suggests that standard dose cytotoxic chemotherapy has no lasting clinically important direct effects on bone metabolism.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are stable pyrophosphate analogs currently used in the treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease, known to affect bone resorption by reducing osteoclast activity. Use of these drugs in adjuvant therapy is currently under investigation following reports of an effect of BPs on tumor cell apoptosis in preclinical models. Recent evidence has suggested that BPs might also affect tumor cell invasion in vitro, and the component processes of adhesion, migration and degradation, through mechanisms including inhibition of prenylation of intracellular small GTPases such as Ras and Rho. The effects potentially may be enhanced through co-administration with chemotherapy agents, as both synergistic and additive effects have been described in vitro. This review discusses the preclinical evidence for the potential use of BPs and cytotoxic drugs for inhibiting tumor cell invasion, a key process in cancer progression.

A randomised phase III trial was conducted to assess the role of interferon-alpha (INFalpha) 2a as maintenance therapy following surgery and/or chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Patients were randomised following initial surgery/chemotherapy to interferon-alpha 2a as 4.5 mega-units subcutaneously 3 days per week or to no further treatment. A total of 300 patients were randomised within the study between February 1990 and July 1997. No benefit for interferon maintenance was seen in terms of either overall or clinical event-free survival. We conclude that INF-alpha is not effective as a maintenance therapy in the management of women with ovarian cancer. The need for novel therapeutics or strategies to prevent the almost inevitable relapse of patients despite increasingly effective surgery and chemotherapy remains.

Bisphosphonate drugs are a group of pyrophosphate analogues which bind avidly to hydroxyapatite bone mineral surfaces and their major action is to inhibit osteoclast activity and thus bone resorption. In oncology, their role in metastatic bone disease is well established, but there is increasing interest in their potential role in preventing and treating cancer-induced bone loss and their possible anti-tumour effects. Metastatic bone disease is associated with a variety of skeletal complications, including pathologic fractures, bone pain, impaired mobility, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia. Intravenous bisphosphonates, particularly zoledronic acid, in conjunction with rehydration, are now established as the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia. For treatment of bone pain, it has also been shown that bisphosphonates can be an effective supplementary approach to radiotherapy. In breast cancer and myeloma, bisphosphonates have now become part of standard therapy to treat and prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) and, until recently, treatment was largely with intravenous pamidronate or oral clodronate. However, large, randomised, multicentre trials using intravenous administration of the highly potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid every 3-4 weeks have recently demonstrated a reduction of 20% in the risk of developing an SRE compared with pamidronate for patients with breast cancer. Moreover, these trials have demonstrated, for the first time, that a bisphosphonate significantly reduces the occurrence of skeletal events in hormone-refractory prostate cancer and in non-small cell lung cancer and a range of other solid tumours. Investigations into the potential of the relatively low potency bisphosphonate, clodronate, for the prevention of bone metastases in breast cancer have produced conflicting data. Further large, randomised studies with clodronate and zoledronic acid are planned and until the results are available it is not possible to identify a definite adjuvant role for bisphosphonates. Evidence is accumulating in vitro that bisphosphonates are also able to directly affect tumour cells, in addition to their effects on osteoclasts, with zoledronic acid being particularly potent. Over recent decades there has been a significant improvement in cure rates and survival times in certain cancers and the use of chemotherapy and hormone therapy has expanded greatly, leading to increasing numbers of long-term survivors who have received these treatments. Management of treatment-induced bone loss is therefore assuming a greater importance and bisphosphonates represent an attractive treatment option in such patients. Several placebo-controlled trials using oral clodronate, oral risedronate, intravenous pamidronate and intravenous zoledronic acid have all now demonstrated benefits in reducing the loss in bone mineral density., (Copyright 2004 Society for Endocrinology)

Hormonal and chemotherapies have been shown to have a profound, positive impact on survival in cancer patients but are associated with adverse effects on bone. The abrupt decrease in bone mineral density caused by these therapies is an emerging treatment challenge. In particular, as the aromatase inhibitors are more widely used, studies indicate that there will be an increased fracture risk. Adjuvant therapy with selective estrogen receptor modifiers spares bone loss in postmenopausal women but not in premenopausal women. Thus other strategies to protect bone are needed. This article discusses various treatments that attempt to offset this bone loss--mainly the protective effects of several bisphosphonates.

Background: Treatment with zoledronic acid (Zol) was compared with a dose of 90 mg of pamidronate (Pam) in breast carcinoma (BC) patients with at least 1 osteolytic lesion based on data from a Phase III, randomized trial., Methods: Overall, 1130 patients with breast carcinoma who had all types of bone metastases (osteolytic, mixed, or osteoblastic by radiology) were randomized to receive treatment with either 4 mg of Zol or 8 mg of Zol as a 15-minute infusion or 90 mg of Pam as a 2-hour infusion every 3-4 weeks for 12 months. A skeletal-related event (SRE) was defined as a pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiotherapy, or surgery to bone., Results: Among all patients with BC, the proportion of those who had an SRE (primary endpoint) was comparable between treatment groups (43% of patients who received 4 mg of Zol vs. 45% of patients who received Pam). Among patients who had breast carcinoma with at least 1 osteolytic lesion (n = 528 patients), the proportion with an SRE was lower in the 4-mg Zol group compared with the Pam group (48% vs. 58%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058). The time to first SRE was significantly longer in the 4-mg Zol group compared with the Pam group (median, 310 vs. 174 days; P = 0.013). Moreover, multiple-event analysis demonstrated significant further reductions in the risk of developing SREs over the reduction achieved with Pam (30% in the osteolytic subset [P = 0.010] and 20% for all patients with BC [P = 0.037])., Conclusions: The current data indicate that treatment with 4 mg of Zol was more effective than 90 mg of Pam in reducing skeletal complications in a subset of patients with breast carcinoma who had at least 1 osteolytic lesion at study entry., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

The compound CMB-401 is an immunoconjugate consisting of the monoclonal antibody (MAb) hCTM01 directed against polymorphic epithelial mucin covalently bound to the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin by an amide linker. We evaluated CMB-401 as monotherapy for the treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Twenty-one 21 women aged 38 to 80 years with recurrent EOC (recurrence >6 months after initial platinum-containing chemotherapy) were enrolled. Tumor response and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels were assessed before and after active treatment. After an initial intravenous (i.v.) dose of hCTM01 (without calicheamicin), the calicheamicin-linked CMB-401 (16 mg/m(2 ) i.v.) was administered over 60 min for up to 7 cycles, with 4 weeks between cycles. Nineteen patients were evaluable. Measurable changes observed following administration of CMB-401 did not meet the criteria for partial remission (PR). CMB-401 was not effective as monotherapy for this type of EOC. Adverse events experienced by patients in the study included nausea (95%), asthenia (90%), abdominal pain (62%), headache (57%), anorexia (57%), and diarrhea (57%), mostly at a toxicity grade level of 1 or 2. Based on published efficacy of conjugates that deliver calicheamicin via hybrid (bifunctional) linkers [e.g. gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) in acute myeloid leukemia], we hypothesize that the amide linker used in CMB-401 may have contributed to its failure to induce PR in patients in this study. Use of hybrid linkers to target hCTM01 or other antibodies to EOC may warrant further investigation.

Background: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a decoy receptor for OPG ligand (OPGL), or receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL). RANKL/RANK interaction is important in terminal differentiation and activation of osteoclasts. In binding to RANKL, OPG blocks differentiation and activation of osteoclasts. AMGN-0007 is a recombinant OPG construct developed as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of bone disease., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, single-dose, dose escalation study was conducted to determine the safety and effect on bone resorption of AMGN-0007 in patients with multiple myeloma (n = 28) or breast carcinoma (n = 26) with radiologically confirmed lytic bone lesions. Patients were randomized (3:1 ratio) to receive a single dose of either AMGN-0007 (subcutaneously [SC]) or pamidronate (90 mg intravenously) and were followed for 56 days. Medications or other diseases affecting bone metabolism and chemotherapy within 28 days of dosing were exclusion criteria. Biologic activity of AMGN-0007 was assessed by measurement of the surrogate marker of bone resorption, urinary N-telopeptide of collagen (NTX)., Results: AMGN-0007 caused a rapid, sustained, dose-dependent decrease in NTX/creatinine levels, which was at least comparable to the profile observed with pamidronate. Four serious adverse events were reported, three in breast carcinoma patients: a fracture in the left femur (pamidronate, considered unrelated), extreme fatigue (0.3 mg/kg AMGN-0007, considered unrelated), and congestive heart failure (1.0 mg/kg AMGN-0007, considered by the investigator to be probably related to doxorubicin and radiation therapy); one event occurred in a multiple myeloma patient: Herpes zoster (pamidronate, considered unrelated). Two multiple myeloma patients (1.0 mg/kg AMGN-0007) had albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels of 1.9 mmol/L on Day 8 but without clinical symptoms., Conclusions: A single SC dose of AMGN-0007 suppressed bone resorption as indicated by a rapid, sustained, and profound decrease of urinary NTX/creatinine in multiple myeloma and breast carcinoma patients. Changes were comparable to those with pamidronate. AMGN-0007 was well tolerated., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11138)

At least 25% of patients with breast cancer develop skeletal metastases, with bone the site of disease producing the greatest morbidity. It is apparent that the bisphosphonates present an important component of the treatment strategy. They are now the treatment of choice in tumour-induced hypercalcaemia, and they can reduce bone pain and skeletal complications such as pathological fractures. In addition, bisphosphonates are being increasingly evaluated in the prevention of bone metastases and to prevent and treat cancer therapy-induced osteoporosis. Ongoing research is aimed at trying to define the optimum route, dose, schedule and type of bisphosphonate.

Purpose: Zoledronic acid, a new and more potent bisphosphonate, was compared with pamidronate, the current standard treatment for patients with osteolytic or mixed bone metastases/lesions., Patients and Methods: A total of 1,648 patients with either Durie-Salmon stage III multiple myeloma or advanced breast cancer and at least one bone lesion were randomly assigned to treatment with either 4 or 8 mg of zoledronic acid via 15-minute intravenous infusion or 90 mg of pamidronate via 2-hour intravenous infusion every 3 to 4 weeks for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing at least one skeletal-related event over 13 months., Results: The proportion of patients with at least one skeletal-related event was similar in all treatment groups. Median time to the first skeletal-related eventwas approximately 1 year in each treatment group. The skeletal morbidity rate was slightly lower in patients treated with zoledronic acid than in those treated with pamidronate, and zoledronic acid (4 mg) significantly decreased the incidence and event rate for radiation therapy to bone, both overall and in breast cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy. Pain scores decreased in all treatment groups in the presence of stable or decreased analgesic use. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) and pamidronate were equally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were bone pain, nausea, fatigue, and fever and < 5% of serious adverse events were related to the study drug. The incidence of renal impairment among patients treated with 4 mg of zoledronic acid via 15-minute infusion was similar to that among patients treated with pamidronate., Conclusions: Zoledronic acid (4 mg) via 15-minute intravenous infusion was as effective and well tolerated as 90 mg of pamidronate in the treatment of osteolytic and mixed bone metastases/lesions in patients with advanced breast cancer or multiple myeloma. (Can-

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity of pemetrexed in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. 38 patients, median age 52 years (range 36-71 years), were given pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) as a 10-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks. Median time from diagnosis to study entry was 48 months (range 14.7-310 months). 33 of 38 patients had prior chemotherapy; 16 adjuvant, 12 metastatic and 5 in both settings. Sites of disease included skin and soft tissue (19/38) nodes (18/38), lung (17/38), liver (13/38) and bone (3/38). An overall response rate of 28% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.2-45.2%) in 10/36 evaluable patients (1 complete response (CR), 9 partial responses (PR)), included reductions in hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 5 of 10 responders had received taxoid or anthracycline therapy for metastatic disease; 3 of these 5 had also received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median duration of response was 8 months (range 1.6-14+ months), and median survival was 13 months (95% CI 9.56-17.38 months). 167 courses were given (median five per patient; range 1-9), with 37 reductions and 33 delays. Reasons for reduction included neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (5%), with delays due to raised LFTs (21%), neutropenia (12%) and other non-treatment related events. The major haematological toxicities (Common Toxicity Criteria) (CTC) were grade 3/4 neutropenia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%) of patients. There was one report of a grade 3 infection. Non-haematological toxicities (all grades 2/3) included elevated transaminases (92%), vomiting (34%), nausea (34%) and mucositis (32%). One episode of grade 4 diarrhoea was reported. Other toxicities included a skin rash, grade 2 (42%), 3 (5%) and 4 (13%), which was ameliorated by the use of prophylactic dexamethasone. These results suggest that pemetrexed has significant antitumour activity in advanced breast cancer with responses in patients who had previously received anthracyclines and taxoids.

Preclinical studies with zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, NJ) have shown its potential in malignant bone disease. Clinical studies in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy have been completed, as have phase I and II trials in patients with cancer and pre-existing bone metastases. Three randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III trials are ongoing to establish the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases. In one study, 4 mg zoledronic acid is compared with the standard therapy, 90 mg pamidronate, in treatment of osteolytic lesions in patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Two other studies, one in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases and another in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and other tumor types, are placebo-controlled. The primary end point in all three studies is the frequency of skeletal complications resulting from bone metastases. Adjuvant trials that assess the ability of zoledronic acid to prevent or reduce the incidence of bone metastases in patients at high risk for future skeletal metastasis are also planned or ongoing. The rationale and design of these ongoing and planned studies is discussed.

Purpose: We have performed a phase I study of the cytotoxic immunoconjugate CMB-401 in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). CMB-401 is a directed chemotherapy that comprises a genetically engineered human antibody against polymorphic epithelial mucin, to which is attached covalently two to three molecules, on average, of the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin. The primary objectives of this two-centre study were to identify end-organ toxicities and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-four patients aged 37-75 years with progressive EOC not amenable to platinum/standard therapy, and with satisfactory WHO performance status (0-2) were recruited. Patients had received a mean of 3.2 previous chemotherapeutic regimens with a median interval since last chemotherapy of 182 days (range 34-1217). Patients received up to four cycles of a dual infusion of 35 mg/m2 hCTMO1 'predose' followed by doses of CMB-401 which were increased for each cohort--a regimen which minimises drug uptake in normal tissues whilst enhancing delivery to the ovarian tumour. CMB-401 dosing commenced at 2 mg/m2 and progressed via seven cohorts to 16 mg/m2., Results: CMB-401 was generally well tolerated. However, transient fever and emesis occurred, necessitating routine prophylaxis, and increasingly significant malaise was reported as the dose increased. WHO grade 3-4 toxicities, irrespective of causality, included: anaemia 21%, granulocytopenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 9%, liver transaminases 3%, sepsis 3%, haemorrhage 6%, nausea/vomiting 76%; pulmonary 6%, and conscious state/somnolence 6%. The MTD was reached at 16 mg/m2. During the study four patients had a greater than 50% reduction in CA125, and three patients had radiological evidence of reduction in tumour bulk., Conclusions: CMB-401 appears to have an acceptable toxicity profile with demonstrable activity against EOC.

Metastatic bone disease develops as a result of the many interactions between tumour cells and bone cells. This leads to disruption of normal bone metabolism, with the increased osteoclast activity seen in most, if not all, tumor types providing a rational target for treatment. The clinical course of metastatic bone disease in multiple myeloma, breast and prostate cancers is relatively long, with patients experiencing sequential skeletal complications over a period of several years. These include bone pain, fractures, hypercalcaemia, and spinal cord compression, all of which may profoundly impair a patient's quality of life. External beam radiotherapy and systemic endocrine and cytotoxic treatments are the mainstay of treatment in advanced cancers. However, it is now clear that the bisphosphonates provide an additional treatment strategy, which reduces both the symptoms and complications of bone involvement. Pamidronate (Aredia(TM)) is the most widely evaluated bisphosphonate and is recommended for most patients with multiple myeloma or breast cancer with bone metastases. Current research aims include the evaluation of new potent bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (Zometa(TM)). It is hoped that this compound is not only more convenient and easier to administer but also more effective in inhibiting skeletal morbidity. Zometa may also have some direct anticancer activity. Preclinical studies with Zometa have demonstrated its potential in malignant bone disease. Clinical studies in treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy have been completed, as have Phase I and II trials in patients with cancer and pre-existing bone metastases. Three randomized, double-blind, controlled Phase III trials are now ongoing to establish the efficacy and safety of Zometa in treatment of bone metastases in patients with osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions. Additionally, new specific molecules such as osteoprotogerin have been developed that are based on our improved understanding of the cellular signalling mechanisms involved in cancer induced bone disease. These potent molecules are now entering clinical trials. Ongoing research is aimed at trying to define the optimum route, dose, schedule and type of bisphosphonate in metastatic bone disease and their use in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in cancer patients. In vitro suggestions of direct anti-cancer activity and some promising clinical data in early breast cancer have resulted in considerable interest in the possible adjuvant use of bisphosphonates to inhibit the development of bone metastases.

47 patients with progressive, painful, predominantly lytic bone metastases from breast cancer were included in a randomised double-blind phase II trial comparing the effects of pamidronate 150 and 300 mg daily. Oral pamidronate produced either sclerosis or stabilisation of lytic metastases for at least 24 weeks in 5 of 24 and 3 of 23 patients at the 300 and 150 mg dose levels, respectively. Evidence of symptomatic improvement was observed in 5 of 22 (23%) and 7 of 22 (32%) patients for symptomatic disease at the respective doses. These improvements were accompanied by a reduction in the rate of bone resorption as shown by suppression (P = < 0.01) of urinary calcium and a non-significant fall in deoxypyridinoline. No obvious differences in efficacy were observed between the two dose levels. Gastrointestinal adverse events, principally comprising nausea and vomiting, were the most commonly reported side-effects leading to discontinuation of trial treatment in 4 of 24 and 2 of 23 patients at 300 and 150 mg dose levels, respectively. The poor tolerability of oral pamidronate coupled with the modest clinical effects reported here suggest that oral pamidronate will not replace the current strategy of regular intravenous infusions of pamidronate for the treatment of osteolytic bone disease.

The management of ovarian cancer is developing rapidly with the improvements in specialist multidisciplinary care. Most patients present with advanced disease and require careful surgical debulking followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. The recent introduction of paclitaxel appears to have improved the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer by an increment that is similar in size to that seen after the introduction of cisplatin in the 1970s. Further clinical trials are required to define the optimum combination and dose of the platinum and taxane analogues, and to establish the role of the many new agents currently undergoing clinical testing. Useful chemotherapy for second-line treatment in platinum-refractory patients is now available, which, combined with more aggressive surgical management, is leading to modest improvements in survival. Improvements in supportive care have enabled increasingly intensive chemotherapy to be given safely. Bone marrow support and inhibitors of specific organ toxicities are likely to be incorporated into treatment protocols over the next decade. The impact of these treatments on patients' quality of life and the economic consequences of a more active approach to management will require careful evaluation.

Bisphosphonates, in conjunction with rehydration, are now the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia of malignancy. They can also relieve bone pain and improve quality of life as single agent therapy and, in conjunction with systemic anticancer treatments, can prevent skeletal complications and slow down the metastatic process. The clinical effects are greatest and most clearly defined in breast cancer and multiple myeloma, but, theoretically, clinical benefit should be achievable across the entire spectrum of metastatic bone disease. The new biochemical markers for measuring bone resorption are for the first time providing a direct assessment of the effects of treatment on bone. It is hoped that they will enable a more scientific selection of the type, dose and schedule of bisphosphonate required for the best compromise between efficacy, convenience and patient acceptability. We can expect to see a rapid increase in the use of bisphosphonates in malignancy (especially breast cancer and myeloma). Careful assessment of the health-care economics of this new treatment modality is urgently needed.

Thirty-four evaluable patients were treated with vinorelbine, a novel, semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. They received vinorelbine 25 mg m-2 i.v. given weekly for a maximum of 16 cycles. Two patients achieved a complete remission and 15 a partial remission, giving a response rate of 17/34 (50%; 95% CI of 34-66%); median response duration was 5.8 months. The median progression-free interval was 4.4 months and median survival 9.9 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Fatigue was the most common side-effect. The main reason for dose adjustments was myelosuppression; 68% of patients had WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and there was one death attributed to neutropenic sepsis. Nausea/vomiting and neuropathy were mild and alopecia was uncommon. This study confirms vinorelbine as a highly active, well-tolerated agent in advanced breast cancer worthy of evaluation in combination chemotherapy regimens.

Mitoxantrone (dihydroxyanthracenedione) is a substituted anthraquinone with a similar spectrum of activity to adriamycin in experimental tumours. One hundred and thirty-four patients with advanced breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with mitoxantrone (14 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks), of whom 99 are presently evaluable for response and all for toxicity. Six patients achieved a complete response and 29 a partial response, the overall response rate being 35% (95% confidence limits, 25-45%). Median time to treatment failure was greater than 46 weeks. Mitoxantrone was well tolerated, myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. The most frequent nonhaematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting (40%), but these were rarely severe. Total alopecia occurred in only 6 patients. Four patients developed clinically significant evidence of cardiotoxicity after cumulative mitoxantrone doses of 174-256 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone offers comparable efficacy and less acute toxicity than the most active currently available single agents in advanced breast cancer.

Thirty-four patients with advanced breast cancer, who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were treated with mitoxantrone 14 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. Eleven of 33 evaluable patients (33%) achieved a partial response; there were no complete responders. Before commencing mitoxantrone, and 3-monthly thereafter, radionuclide assessment of ventricular performance was obtained at rest and in response to stress. Ten patients showed a deterioration in ejection fraction, two of whom developed congestive cardiac failure. Dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Nausea and vomiting were generally mild and transient. Alopecia was minimal in most patients. Mitoxantrone is an active, well-tolerated new drug in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, but cardiotoxicity may occur in a proportion of patients. Further investigation is required to determine the precise nature, incidence and prognosis of cardiotoxicity encountered with mitoxantrone.