Search

Background: The phase III PROSELICA (NCT01308580) and FIRSTANA (NCT01308567) trials investigated taxane chemotherapy among men with postdocetaxel metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, respectively. We present a post hoc analysis of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients with or without a clinical (pain, tumor, or prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) response., Materials and Methods: PROSELICA and FIRSTANA HRQL and pain data were collected and analyzed using protocol-defined Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and McGill-Melzack (Present Pain Intensity scale) questionnaires. Outcomes included definitive FACT-P Total Score (TS) improvements and longitudinal assessment of FACT-P TS., Results: In PROSELICA and FIRSTANA, the proportion of patients receiving taxane chemotherapy with a definitive FACT-P TS improvement was significantly higher among patients with versus without a pain or PSA response (pain: PROSELICA: 67% vs. 33.5%; p < .001; FIRSTANA: 75.2% vs. 45.8%; p < .001; PSA: PROSELICA: 50.3% vs. 34.2%; p < .001; FIRSTANA: 49.8% vs. 38.9%; p = .001). In PROSELICA, the proportion of patients receiving taxane chemotherapy with a definitive FACT-P TS improvement was significantly higher among patients with versus without a tumor response; the proportion was numerically higher in FIRSTANA (PROSELICA: 54.4% vs. 36.7%; p = .001; FIRSTANA: 50.6% vs. 45.3%). FACT-P TS was significantly improved or maintained for the majority of treatment cycles analyzed., Conclusion: In PROSELICA and FIRSTANA, HRQL improvements were significantly higher among patients with a pain, tumor, or PSA response versus those without, with the exception of patients with a tumor response in FIRSTANA., Implications for Practice: Using data from the FIRSTANA and PROSELICA phase III clinical trials, this study demonstrated that patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving docetaxel or cabazitaxel who exhibited a response (pain, tumor, prostate-specific antigen), often experienced significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQL) compared with patients without a response. For patients with a pain response, significant HRQL improvements occurred early and were maintained. This study provides further insight into the impact of taxane chemotherapy on the HRQL of patients with mCRPC and allows for a better understanding of the relationship between treatment, response, and HRQL, supporting therapeutic decision making., (© 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) offer the potential of maximizing efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. ASG-5ME, an SLC44A4-targeting antibody carrying monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting agent, was investigated in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Methods The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose. Secondary objectives were safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic properties, immunogenicity, and the detection of SLC44A4 on circulating tumor cells. Patients (pts) were treated among 7 dose levels every 21 days. A dose expansion phase enrolled 20 additional pts. at the MTD. Results Twenty-six and 20 pts. were treated in dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts respectively. The MTD was 2.7 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 4 pts.: grade 3 fatigue (n = 1); grade 3 abdominal pain, diarrhea and fatigue (n = 1); grade 4 neutropenia and hyponatremia and grade 3 maculopapular rash, constipation and hypoxia (n = 1); grade 3 troponin elevation without cardiac sequelae (n = 1). Fatigue and diarrhea were the most prevalent adverse events (AEs) across all cycles. Two grade 5 AEs occurred in the dose expansion cohort, each after 1 dose: 1 pt. developed grade 3 hyperglycemia, renal insufficiency and leukopenia; 1 pt. developed grade 3 hyperglycemia complicated by bacteremia. Free MMAE levels did not accumulate with repeat dosing. Of evaluable pts., 52% had either stable disease or a partial response. Conclusions Further development of ASG-5ME is not being pursued due to its narrow therapeutic index. Some toxicities were potentially related to on-target effects on normal tissue expressing the SLC44A4 protein. However, other toxicities were consistent with studies of previous MMAE-containing ADCs. Unconjugated MMAE is a less likely etiology based on prior data.

Background: In men with a rising PSA following radical prostatectomy, salvage radiation therapy (SRT) offers a second chance for cure. Hormonal therapy can be combined with SRT in order to increase prostate tumor control, albeit with associated higher rates of treatment side effects. This trial studies the effectiveness of SRT combined with hormonal therapy using a more potent anti-androgen with a favorable side effect profile. Enzalutamide, a next generation selective androgen receptor antagonist, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) where it has been shown to improve overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination SRT and enzalutamide for freedom-from-PSA-progression. Secondary objectives include time to local recurrence within the radiation field, metastasis-free survival and safety as determined by frequency and severity of adverse events., Methods/design: This is a randomized, double-blind, phase II, prospective, multicenter study in adult males with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Following registration, enzalutamide 160 mg or placebo by mouth (PO) once daily will be administered for 6 months. Following two months of study drug, external beam radiotherapy to 66.6-70.2 Gray (Gy) will be administered to the prostate bed over 7-8 weeks while continuing daily placebo/enzalutamide. This is followed by two additional months of placebo/enzalutamide., Discussion: The SALV-ENZA trial is the first phase II placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized study to test SRT in combination with a next generation androgen receptor antagonist in men with high-risk recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The primary hypothesis of this study is that clinical outcomes will be improved by the addition of enzalutamide compared to standard-of-care SRT alone and pave the path for phase III evaluation of this combination., Trial Registrations: ClinicaltTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02203695 Date of Registration: 06/16/2014. Date of First Participant Enrollment: 04/16/2015.

Purpose Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m 2 (C25) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus mitoxantrone ( P < .001) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase III TROPIC study. The phase III PROSELICA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308580) assessed the noninferiority of cabazitaxel 20 mg/m 2 (C20) versus C25 in postdocetaxel patients with mCRPC. Methods Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, measurability of disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and region, and randomly assigned to receive C20 or C25. To claim noninferiority of C20 (maintenance of ≥ 50% of the OS benefit of C25 v mitoxantrone in TROPIC) with 95% confidence level, the upper boundary of the CI of the hazard ratio (HR) for C20 versus C25 could not exceed 1.214 under a one-sided 98.89% CI after interim analyses. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor and pain responses and progression, health-related quality of life, and safety. Results Overall, 1,200 patients were randomly assigned (C20, n = 598; C25, n = 602). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median OS was 13.4 months for C20 and 14.5 months for C25 (HR, 1.024). The upper boundary of the HR CI was 1.184 (less than the 1.214 noninferiority margin). Significant differences were observed in favor of C25 for PSA response (C20, 29.5%; C25, 42.9%; nominal P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median: C20, 5.7 months; C25, 6.8 months; HR for C20 v C25, 1.195; 95% CI, 1.025 to 1.393). Health-related quality of life did not differ between cohorts. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were 39.7% for C20 and 54.5% for C25. Conclusion The efficacy of cabazitaxel in postdocetaxel patients with mCRPC was confirmed. The noninferiority end point was met; C20 maintained ≥ 50% of the OS benefit of C25 versus mitoxantrone in TROPIC. Secondary efficacy end points favored C25. Fewer adverse events were observed with C20.

Background: We previously showed that pretreatment detection of androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from men with castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide, but not to taxane chemotherapies. Here, we conducted serial measurements of AR-V7 and evaluated patterns of longitudinal AR-V7 dynamics over the course of multiple sequential therapies., Patients and Methods: Metastatic prostate cancer patients treated at Johns Hopkins with AR-directed therapies or taxane chemotherapies underwent serial liquid biopsies for CTC-based AR-V7 analysis at baseline, during therapy, and at progression. We used a CTC enrichment platform followed by multiplexed reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis to detect full-length androgen receptor and AR-V7 transcripts. Patients selected for inclusion in this report were those who provided ≥4 CTC samples, at least one of which was AR-V7 positive, over the course of ≥2 consecutive therapies., Results: We identified 14 patients who received a total of 37 therapies and contributed 70 CTC samples for AR-V7 analysis during a median follow-up period of 11 months. Three patients remained AR-V7 positive during the entire course of therapy. The remainder underwent transitions in AR-V7 status: there were eight instances of 'conversions' from AR-V7-negative to -positive status (during treatment with first-line androgen deprivation therapy, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and docetaxel), and six instances of 'reversions' from AR-V7-positive to -negative status (during treatment with docetaxel and cabazitaxel)., Conclusions: AR-V7 is a dynamic marker, and transitions in AR-V7 status may reflect selective pressures on the tumor exerted by therapeutic interventions. While 'conversions' to AR-V7-positive status were observed with both AR-directed therapies and taxane chemotherapies, 'reversions' to AR-V7-negative status only occurred during taxane therapies. Serial blood-based AR-V7 testing is feasible in routine clinical practice, and may provide insights into temporal changes in tumor evolution., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the backbone of treatment for metastatic prostate cancer since the 1940s. We assessed whether concomitant treatment with ADT plus docetaxel would result in longer overall survival than that with ADT alone., Methods: We assigned men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to receive either ADT plus docetaxel (at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks for six cycles) or ADT alone. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that the median overall survival would be 33.3% longer among patients receiving docetaxel added to ADT early during therapy than among patients receiving ADT alone., Results: A total of 790 patients (median age, 63 years) underwent randomization. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, the median overall survival was 13.6 months longer with ADT plus docetaxel (combination therapy) than with ADT alone (57.6 months vs. 44.0 months; hazard ratio for death in the combination group, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median time to biochemical, symptomatic, or radiographic progression was 20.2 months in the combination group, as compared with 11.7 months in the ADT-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72; P<0.001). The rate of a prostate-specific antigen level of less than 0.2 ng per milliliter at 12 months was 27.7% in the combination group versus 16.8% in the ADT-alone group (P<0.001). In the combination group, the rate of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia was 6.2%, the rate of grade 3 or 4 infection with neutropenia was 2.3%, and the rate of grade 3 sensory neuropathy and of grade 3 motor neuropathy was 0.5%., Conclusions: Six cycles of docetaxel at the beginning of ADT for metastatic prostate cancer resulted in significantly longer overall survival than that with ADT alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00309985.).

Purpose of Review: Prognostic clinical, pathological, and molecular parameters identify patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer that are at risk for the development of future metastatic disease and shorter survival. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, docetaxel-based chemotherapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life, and is the standard of care. It may be rational to hypothesize that early utilization of chemotherapy may delay the onset of distant metastasis and prolong survival in the earlier nonmetastatic disease. A discussion on ongoing clinical trials and natural history aspects applicable to clinical trials design in this setting are presented herein., Recent Findings: Preliminary data suggest that chemotherapy is well tolerated, feasible, and potentially active in nonmetastatic prostate cancer. However, results from prospective randomized trials were not published yet., Summary: In nonmetastatic prostate cancer, application of chemotherapy remains an open question awaiting prospective validation and should be routinely applied outside of clinical trials. In view of the long natural history, evaluation of conventional endpoints as time to distant metastasis and survival are challenging even in the high-risk patients. Appropriate patient selection based on predictive biomarkers and surrogate endpoints may provide critical information for patient selection and study design.

Purpose: The TAX-327 study randomized 1,006 men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer to receive 3-weekly docetaxel, weekly docetaxel, or mitoxantrone, each with prednisone., Experimental Design: We used the TAX-327 database to address (a) the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and pain; (b) whether minimally symptomatic patients benefit from treatment or have treatment-related decline in QoL; (c) the relationships between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, pain response, and QoL response; (d) the times at which these responses are first observed; and (e) whether PSA, pain, and/or QoL response predict for overall survival., Results: At baseline, 374 of 815 men assessed for QoL had major pain; of these, 92% had substantial impairment of QoL compared with 75% without major pain (P < 0.001). Men with minimal symptoms had prolonged survival (median, 25.6 months) compared with symptomatic patients (median, 17.1 months; P = 0.009); they were more likely to have initial deterioration of QoL if treated with weekly docetaxel. PSA response and pain response, but not QoL response, were independently associated with survival in landmark analysis. Median times to PSA and pain response were 44 and 27 days, respectively; some men had initial increase in serum PSA before subsequent decline., Conclusions: Symptoms other than pain contribute to impaired QoL in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Those with minimal symptoms have prolonged survival. Both pain and PSA response are associated with survival but are not adequate to use as surrogate end points in phase 3 studies. Early increases in serum PSA (up to 12 weeks) should be ignored when determining response or progression.

The combination of temozolomide (TEM) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) previously demonstrated a 30% response rate in metastatic melanoma. A single institution, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of TEM/IFN in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted. Safety and tumor response were the main outcomes. Eligible patients received 200 mg/m(2)/day TEM orally on days 1-5 every 28 days, with IFN 2.5 million U/m(2)/day subcutaneously (s.c.) three alternate days/week for days 1-15 first cycle, then 5 million U/m(2)/day s.c. 3 alternate days/week throughout each 28-day cycle. Efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks, and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were treated with dose reductions of the culprit drug. Sixteen patients (ages 37-67) were initially enrolled. Of the 14 evaluable patients, there was one minor response. Best response was stable disease, with 7 patients remaining on study for > or =6 months. Five were alive for more than 2 years, and 2 remain alive at 45 and 50 months after enrollment. DLTs included TEM-induced myelosuppression and IFN-induced fever/chills. Other toxicities were mild to moderate (grades 1-3). The combination of TEM/IFN proved quite tolerable. This regimen appears inactive in terms of response in this population with poor prognosis, but the patients with stable disease > or =6 months remain of interest.

Purpose: Sodium phenylbutyrate (PB) demonstrates potent differentiating capacity in multiple hematopoietic and solid tumor cell lines. We conducted a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of PB by continuous infusion to characterize the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with a 120-h PB infusion every 21 days. The dose was escalated from 150 to 515 mg/kg/day. Pharmacokinetics were performed during and after the first infusion period using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and single compartmental pharmacokinetic model for PB and its principal metabolite, phenylacetate., Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled on study, with hormone refractory prostate cancer being the predominant tumor type. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 89 cycles were administered. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neuro-cortical, exemplified by excessive somnolence and confusion and accompanied by clinically significant hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hyperuricemia. One patient at 515 mg/kg/day and another at 345 mg/kg/day experienced this DLT. Toxicity resolved < or =12 h of discontinuing the infusion. Other toxicities were mild, including fatigue and nausea. The maximum tolerated dose was 410 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics demonstrated that plasma clearance of PB increased in a continuous fashion beginning 24 h into the infusion. In individuals whose V(max) for drug elimination was less than their drug-dosing rate, the active metabolite phenylacetate accumulated progressively. Plasma PB concentrations (at 410 mg/kg/day) remained above the targeted therapeutic threshold of 500 micromol/liter required for in vitro activity., Conclusion: The DLT in this Phase I study for infusional PB given for 5 days every 21 days is neuro-cortical in nature. The recommended Phase II dose is 410 mg/kg/day for 120 h.

Purpose: Validated end points are lacking for clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Controversy remains regarding the utility of a posttreatment decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether posttreatment declines in PSA were associated with clinical measures of improvement in a randomized phase III trial of suramin plus hydrocortisone versus placebo plus hydrocortisone., Patients and Methods: A total of 460 HRPC patients were randomized to receive suramin plus hydrocortisone (n = 229) or placebo plus hydrocortisone (n = 231). All patients had symptomatic, metastatic HRPC requiring opioid analgesics. Clinical end points evaluated included overall survival, objective progression-free survival (OPFS), and time to pain progression (TTPP). An evaluation of overall survival, OPFS, and TTPP as a function of a PSA decline of > or = 50%, lasting at least 28 days, was undertaken by using a landmark analysis at 6, 9, and 12 weeks. A multivariate analysis of the impact of PSA decline was performed on these clinical end points., Results: A decline in PSA of > or = 50% lasting > or = 28 days was significantly associated with a prolonged median overall survival, OPFS, and TTPP, both in the entire group and the suramin plus hydrocortisone group at all three landmarks in both univariate and multivariate analysis., Conclusion: In this prospective, randomized trial of suramin plus hydrocortisone versus placebo plus hydrocortisone, a posttherapy decline in PSA of > or = 50%, lasting 28 days, was associated with prolonged median overall survival, improved median progression-free survival, and median TTPP. This analysis suggests that a posttreatment decline in PSA may be a reasonable intermediate end point in HRPC trials and calls into question the clinical utility of preclinical assays evaluating the in vitro effect of given agents on PSA secretion.

Purpose: Suramin is a novel agent that has demonstrated preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A prospective randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate pain and opioid analgesic intake as surrogates for antitumor response in HRPC patients with significant, opioid analgesic-dependent pain., Patients and Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients to receive a 78-day, outpatient regimen of either suramin plus hydrocortisone (HC, 40 mg/d) or placebo plus HC. Treatment assignment was unblinded when either disease progression or dose-limiting toxicity occurred; placebo patients were allowed to cross-over to open-label suramin plus HC. In addition to pain and opioid analgesic intake, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, time to disease progression, quality of life, performance status, and survival were compared., Results: Overall mean reductions in combined pain and opioid analgesic intake were greater for suramin plus HC (rank sum P =.0001). Pain response was achieved in a higher proportion of patients receiving suramin than placebo (43% v 28%; P =.001), and duration of response was longer for suramin responders (median, 240 v 69 days; P =.0027). Time to disease progression was longer (relative risk = 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.9) and the proportion of patients with a greater than 50% decline in PSA was higher (33% v 16%; P =.01) in patients who received suramin. Neither quality of life nor performance status was decreased by suramin treatment, and overall survival was similar. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity and were easily managed medically., Conclusion: Outpatient treatment with suramin plus HC is well tolerated and provides moderate palliative benefit and delay in disease progression for patients with symptomatic HRPC.

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients often have nonmeasurable disease. In such patients, predictive biomarkers other than tumor response may be required to compare therapeutic effects. We examined the predictive value for survival of various clinical and laboratory parameters, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA), in HRPC patients treated with suramin. Data from 103 HRPC patients were analyzed using various survival analyses, the likelihood ratio approach, and logistic regression analyses. When pretreatment factors, percentage decrease in PSA at 4 weeks from start of treatment (deltaPSA), and updated survival data were fit by a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, acid phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and deltaPSA were significant, with risk ratios close to 1. There was a decrease in likelihood ratio with increasing APSA. A logistic regression model was developed to predict the probability of <1 year of survival from the start of treatment. Hemoglobin and deltaPSA were found to be significant variables. However, in view of the complexities involving the relationship between PSA expression and prostate cancer growth and possible selective effect of treatment on PSA, further prospective testing is necessary. Therefore, deltaPSA cannot necessarily be used as a biomarker for survival response in individual patients during the evaluation of the therapeutic response of HRPC to new antineoplastic drugs.

Suramin is an investigational drug that has shown therapeutic activity in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer in Phase I/II trials. Dose-limiting neurotoxicity remains the most serious complication of suramin treatment. We performed a prospective study to define the incidence, severity, characteristics, and dose relationships of suramin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Twenty-two patients who received suramin in a Phase-I trial underwent baseline and serial follow-up neurological evaluations consisting of history, examination, nerve conduction studies and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Suramin was administered intravenously in escalating dosages by using a 5-day schedule (repeated monthly), with the dose, determined by a population pharmacokinetic model, to accomplish 30-min post-infusion concentrations of 300 micrograms ml-1 (cohort I), 350 micrograms m-1 (cohort II) and 400 micrograms ml-1 (cohort III). Twelve patients developed a mild, axonal, length-dependent, sensory-motor poly-neuropathy. Three other patients developed a subacutely progressive, functionally disabling, demyelinating neuropathy; sural nerve biopsy in two patients showed lymphocytic inflammation. These three patients improved after drug discontinuation and plasmapheresis. Although there was no apparent correlation between the cumulative dose and the severity of the neuropathy, no patient from cohort I, but 88% of patients from cohorts II and III, developed neuropathy. We conclude that when suramin is used at peak concentrations of > or = 350 micrograms ml-1 its administration is associated with two patterns of neuropathy, a distal axonal neuropathy and an inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy that is partially reversible. Neurological monitoring for development of neuropathy will improve the safety of suramin use in future clinical studies.

Purpose: Therapy with suramin sodium has been associated with photophobia, iritis, optic atrophy, and vortex keratopathy. We studied the ocular findings in patients who underwent treatment with suramin sodium for metastatic cancer of the prostate., Methods: In a prospective study, 114 patients who underwent treatment with suramin sodium for cancer of the prostate had an ophthalmologic examination with two weeks of onset of treatment and two weeks after termination of therapy. Additional examinations were performed on patients who developed ocular symptoms during suramin sodium therapy., Results: Nineteen (16.6%) of 114 patients developed ocular symptoms and signs while taking suramin sodium. Thirteen of these patients developed bilateral corneal epithelial whorllike deposits. In ten patients, the corneal deposits were associated with foreign body sensation and lacrimation. Symptoms in all of these patients resolved with topical lubricants. Three patients developed asymptomatic corneal deposits. Seven patients had blurred vision and were found to have a mean hyperopic shift in refractive error of 1.13 +/- 0.45 diopters (range, 0.75 to 2.00 diopters) that persisted throughout their treatment course. None of these patients had a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity., Conclusions: In this study, ocular symptoms and signs associated with suramin sodium were common but were not considered a dose-limiting toxicity. Hyperopic shift in refractive error is a previously unreported ocular finding in association with suramin sodium therapy.

Purpose: We evaluated the surrogate role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using prospectively collected information from patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with suramin., Materials and Methods: Data from 103 patients were analyzed using survival analysis, exploratory analysis, and regression analysis., Results: There was a significant survival difference between groups of patients with a PSA decrease of < or = 0% or greater than 0% (P = .018). There were no significant overall survival differences between groups of patients with PSA decreases less than 50% or > or = 50% and less than 75% or > or = 75%. Tree-based modeling did not define a specific threshold percentage PSA change as a response criterion. For a response of 1-year survival, sensitivity increased (0.91 v 0.69), but specificity decreased (0.37 v 0.62), with a 75% versus 50% PSA decrease used as classification criterion. Differences between the area under the receiver-operating curves (ROCs) with 50% and 75% PSA decreases as threshold values were small. For a response of 1-year survival, attributable proportions were 0.38 and 0.68, respectively, with 50% and 75% PSA decreases as threshold values. When pretreatment variables were assessed by Cox proportional hazards model, hemoglobin level was the most significant predictor of survival. When percentage PSA change was included in the model, hemoglobin level remained the most significant factor, but percentage PSA change was also a weak, but statistically significant, factor. PSA was a weak, but statistically significant, predictor of survival in Cox proportional hazards model with PSA as a time-variant covariate., Conclusion: Reduction in PSA level has weak prognostic significance with respect to survival in HRPC patients, but, currently, PSA reduction cannot be used as a reliable response criterion to evaluate treatment efficacy in individual patients. Prospective, randomized studies, including prospective measurement of other indices related to symptomatic clinical benefits, are required.

Background and Design: During a trial of suramin for advanced solid tumors, a high rate of cutaneous adverse reactions was observed. We present a prospective study, describing the clinical, histopathologic, histochemical, and immunochemical findings of the cutaneous reactions observed in 60 patients treated with suramin., Results: Forty-nine (82%) of the 60 patients studied experienced at least one cutaneous reaction attributable to suramin therapy. Although morbilliform reactions predominated, a wide variety of eruptions was observed. Most reactions occurred within the first 24 hours of therapy and were self-limited despite continued drug infusion. Distinctive cutaneous findings included scaling erythematous papules (suramin keratoses) and a predilection of many eruptions for previously sun-exposed areas. Six patients experienced severe cutaneous reactions, but no patient permanently withdrew from therapy because of cutaneous toxic reactions. Common histopathologic findings included hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, spongiosis, acanthosis, exocytosis, apoptosis, a perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, upper dermal edema, and increased dermal mucin. Staining with S100 antigen was markedly positive in several specimens. Only trace amounts of suramin were detected in skin samples tested with high-pressure liquid chromatography., Conclusions: The incidence of cutaneous toxic reactions from suramin greatly exceeds that seen with other medications. A wide spectrum of skin manifestations were observed, including suramin keratoses and UV recall, although serious reactions were infrequent. Cutaneous toxic reactions neither predicted nor correlated with other toxic reactions from suramin. Suramin may soon become more widely used; practitioners should be aware of the high incidence and wide spectrum of cutaneous toxic reactions to this drug.

CHIP, a second generation analogue of cisplatin, was subjected to a Phase II trial for the treatment of advanced, hormonally refractory carcinoma of the prostate. Forty-six patients were treated with CHIP 300 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks. Evaluations for tumor response were done after three cycles of therapy. Among 40 evaluable patients there were no complete responses, but there were 6 partial responses for an overall response rate of 15% (95% confidence interval of 5.7 to 29.8%). The median time to response was 2.4 months and the median progression-free survival was 4.1 months. Median survival was 8.4 months. The most common toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal. While CHIP can be administered on an outpatient basis, its response rate for prostatic carcinoma appears to be similar to that of cisplatin.

Didemnin B, a dipsipeptide isolated from the Caribbean tunicate Trididemnum with antitumor and antiviral activity was evaluated in a phase II trial in the treatment of metastatic, hormonally refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Thirteen patients were treated with didemnin B at 3.5 mg/m2 and 20 patients were treated at 6.3 mg/m2 intravenously every 28 days. Response was assessed every 8 weeks. Of 32 evaluable patients there was one partial response for an overall response rate of 3% (95% confidence interval of 0.1-16%). The most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Serious cardiac and pulmonary toxicities were also noted. This drug does not appear to warrant further evaluation in this disease as a single agent.

Amonafide (benzisoquinolinedione; NSC 308847) was subjected to a Phase II trial for the treatment of advanced hormone-refractory carcinoma of the prostate. In addition to adequate baseline organ functions, patients were required to have a favorable performance status, bidimensionally measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. Amonafide was given at a dose of 225 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Dose escalation and reduction schema were used based upon toxicities from preceding cycles. Of 47 patients enrolled, 43 were evaluable. The most common toxicities were hematologic to include leukopenia (72%), granulocytopenia (32.6%), and thrombocytopenia (44.2%). There were no complete responses and only 5 partial responses for an overall response rate of 12% (95% confidence interval: 4-25%). The results indicate that Amonafide, in the dose and schedule tested, lacks sufficient activity against hormone-refractory prostate cancer to warrant further trials.

Purpose: To assess the impact of prognostic factors, including continued (orchiectomy) versus discontinued androgen-suppression (nonorchiectomy) therapy, on chemotherapy response and survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer., Methods: Analysis of five consecutive Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) phase II chemotherapy trials was undertaken., Results: Two hundred five hormone-refractory patients were evaluated. Eighty-four percent had been orchiectomized. The median survival durations for the nonorchiectomy and orchiectomy patients were 6 and 7 months, respectively (P = .73). In a univariate analysis, orchiectomy patients had a significantly longer median time from diagnosis to first hormone therapy (1.1 v 0.1 years, P = .003), were more likely to have had chemotherapy initiated > or = 2 years from diagnosis (75% v 56%, P = .03), had a lower incidence of liver metastases (16% v 30%, P = .05), and had lower likelihood of being black (8% v 18%, P = .05) when compared with the nonorchiectomy group. Orchiectomy patients had a marginally significant longer median time from initial hormone treatment, more prior endocrine manipulations, lower median baseline alkaline phosphatase levels, and a lower likelihood of response to chemotherapy when compared with the nonorchiectomy group. Absence of liver metastases (P = .004), hemoglobin level > or = 10 g/dL (P < .001), acid phosphatase level > or = 1.2 IU/L (P = .05), response to chemotherapy (P = .001), and > or = 2 years from initial hormone treatment (P = .01) are important factors for survival., Conclusion: This study failed to show obvious advantages in response to chemotherapy or survival for patients with continued gonadal suppression. A prospective randomized trial is suggested to evaluate the effect of this factor on progression-free and overall survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic model for suramin; (2) use Bayesian methods to assess suramin pharmacokinetics in individual patients; (3) use individual patients' pharmacokinetic parameter estimates to individualize suramin dose and schedule and maintain plasma suramin concentrations within predetermined target ranges; and (4) assess the feasibility of outpatient administration of suramin by intermittent, short infusions., Methods: Plasma suramin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and compartmental pharmacokinetic models were fit using a Bayesian algorithm. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using an iterative two-stage approach. Estimates of each patient's central-compartment volume were used to calculate suramin dosage. Simulation of that patient's suramin clearance was used to predict the time of his next dose. Using this approach, plasma suramin concentration was maintained at between 200 and 300, 175 and 275, 150 and 250, or 100 and 200 microgram/mL in four sequential patient cohorts. The ability of two- and three-compartment, open, linear models to fit the pharmacokinetic data was compared. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, using both two- and three-compartment structural models in 69 hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients., Results: Target plasma suramin concentrations in individual patients were rapidly achieved. Concentrations were maintained within desired ranges for > or = 85% of treatment duration in all cohorts. A three-compartment, open, linear model described suramin pharmacokinetics better than did a two-compartment, open, linear model. Population pharmacokinetic estimates generated for two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic models demonstrated modest interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the long terminal half-life of suramin., Conclusion: Suramin can be administered by intermittent short infusion. Adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing facilitated precise control of plasma suramin concentrations and allowed a number of different concentration ranges to be studied. This approach is expensive and labor-intensive. Although we have demonstrated the ability to control drug exposure, simpler dosing schedules require critical evaluation. Population pharmacokinetic parameters generated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer will facilitate rational design of such schedules.

Background: Previous studies indicate that suramin may be an active agent for treatment of solid tumors. The clinical use of suramin is complicated by a broad spectrum of toxic effects and complex pharmacology. Studies have suggested that the dose-limiting neurotoxicity of this agent is closely related to sustained plasma drug concentrations of 350 micrograms/mL or more., Purpose: This phase I clinical trial in patients with solid tumors was designed to determine whether plasma concentrations resulting in both antitumor activity and manageable toxicity could be achieved with short, intermittent infusions of suramin., Methods: Thirty-seven patients, including 33 with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer, collectively received 43 courses of suramin designed to maintain a plasma concentration range of 200-300, 175-275, or 150-250 micrograms/mL. Patients received a test dose of 200 mg and an initial loading dose of 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of therapy. Subsequent suramin doses and schedules were individually determined using a strategy of adaptive control with feedback, which used a maximum a posteriori Bayesian algorithm to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Patients were treated until dose-limiting toxicity or progressive disease developed., Results: Thirty-five of the 37 study patients and 31 of the 33 with prostate cancer were assessable for toxicity and response. Treatment was discontinued in 28 patients because of dose-limiting toxicity consisting of a syndrome of malaise, fatigue, and lethargy; recurrent reduction in creatinine clearance of 50% or more; or axonal neuropathy. Evidence of major antitumor activity was observed in patients with prostate cancer treated at all three plasma drug concentrations. Measurable responses (one complete response and five partial responses) were noted in six of 12 patients with measurable disease. Twenty-four (77%) of 31 patients had a reduction in prostate-specific antigen of 50% or more, and 17 (55%) of 31 had a reduction of 75% or more. Twenty (83%) of 24 patients reported reduction in pain., Conclusions: Suramin can be safely administered as an intermittent bolus injection by use of adaptive control with feedback to control plasma drug concentrations; toxicity is significant but manageable and reversible. Suramin is active against hormone-refractory prostate cancer., Implications: Future trials should address the role and necessary extent of therapeutic drug monitoring; the optimal plasma drug concentration range and duration of therapy; and the activity of suramin in combination with other agents, in earlier stages of prostate cancer, and in other tumor types.

A substantial proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck have extensive locoregional disease at presentation. While extensive surgical procedures may completely eradicate local disease with acceptable morbidity for smaller tumors, in patients with stage III and IV disease, high local relapse rates and relatively short survival times still characterize the course of the majority of such patients. For patients with locally unresectable disease, the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation has resulted in encouraging data both in terms of local control and survival. Combined-modality programs frequently employ platinum coordination complexes, and standard or hyperfractionated radio-therapy toxicity data suggest that the overall tolerance of such programs is acceptable and, more important, long-term follow-up has shown that function can be largely preserved. In this review we illustrate the experience with combined single-agent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and discuss the methodologic difficulties of clinical trials in this setting. We describe our experience with combined carboplatin and simultaneous conventional radiation in patients with extensive unresectable locoregional disease. Encouraging results and modest toxicity clearly support further testing with this approach, especially in patients with less advanced and bulky disease.

The experience with cytotoxic drugs in penile and urethral carcinomas is limited to small series, frequently with inconclusive results. However, the preliminary evidence indicates that these tumors are responsive to drugs, particularly cisplatin, bleomycin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, as well as combinations of these agents. Efforts should continue to identify active regimens, and newer therapies such as biologic response modifiers, differentiation-inducing agents, and biochemical modulations should be tested vigorously. The potential of postoperative or postradiation adjuvant chemotherapy also warrants exploration. Because these tumors are so uncommon, penile and urethral carcinomas should be the focus of investigations by multi-institutional cooperative groups.

Most of the chemotherapeutic agents available for clinical practice have been employed against prostatic cancer, either alone or in combination. Evaluation of the results has been complicated by various factors, not the least of which relates to the nature of the disease itself. In this comprehensive review of the literature, the authors have compiled the results to date.

Extensive experience with chemotherapy in prostatic cancer has accumulated over the past several years. Assessment of antitumor activity is complicated by a lack of uniform and reproducible criteria in past studies and by difficulties in quantitating tumor mass. Overall, the data illustrate that therapeutic benefits have been marginal at best and survival of patients with endocrine-resistant disease is not affected by chemotherapy. Major efforts should focus on the development of new, effective chemotherapeutic approaches.

Carboplatin (CBDCA, Bristol-Meyers, New York) is a second generation platinum analog. Preclinical and phase I clinical studies have indicated a different spectrum of toxicity compared with the parent compound. In order to study the activity of carboplatin against cancer of the head and neck, 31 patients with recurrent or metastatic disease (30 squamous-cell and one adenoid cystic carcinoma) were treated with doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 administered daily by intravenous (IV) bolus injections for five days, repeated at every 4- to 5-week intervals. In most cases, treatment was administered on an outpatient basis. Eight patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, 12% to 45%) had complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) with a median duration of 4.5 months. Moderate bone marrow suppression was the main toxicity. Mild nausea and vomiting was unusual and no neuro- or nephrotoxicity were seen. These preliminary data suggest that carboplatin has activity against advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck comparable with the results reported with cisplatin alone in similar patient populations. The potential advantages over the parent compound relate to the absence of nephrotoxic effects and mild gastrointestinal toxicity which allows for outpatient treatment. Because carboplatin toxicity is directly dependent on its mechanism of renal excretion, particular attention should be given for its use in patients with impaired renal function or when combined with nephrotoxic agents. Similarly, because the dose limiting toxicity with this agent is primarily hematologic, its use in combination with other myelotoxic agents should be carefully undertaken. Further studies are indicated in order to define the spectrum of activity of the new generation platinum analogs in various tumors in humans.

To test the hypothesis that maximal androgen blockade improves the effectiveness of the treatment of prostatic cancer, we conducted a randomized, double-blind trial in patients with disseminated, previously untreated prostate cancer (stage D2). All 603 men received leuprolide, an analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone that inhibits the release of gonadotropins, in combination with either placebo or flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen that inhibits the binding of androgens to the cell nucleus. As compared with the 300 patients receiving leuprolide and placebo, the 303 patients randomly assigned to receive leuprolide and flutamide had a longer progression-free survival (16.5 vs. 13.9 months; P = 0.039) and an increase in the median length of survival (35.6 vs. 28.3 months; P = 0.035). The differences between the treatments were particularly evident for men with minimal disease and good performance status; however, further studies should be conducted in this subgroup. Symptomatic improvement was greatest during the first 12 weeks of the combined androgen blockade, when leuprolide alone often produces a painful flare in the disease. We conclude that in patients with advanced prostate cancer, treatment with leuprolide and flutamide is superior to treatment with leuprolide alone.

Thrombocytopenia, the dose-limiting toxicity of carboplatin, is manageable and predictable with the dosing equation: Dose (mg/m2) = (0.091) (creatinine clearance)/(body surface area) (desired percentage change in platelet count) + 86. We used this equation to dose patients receiving carboplatin (day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 days 1 to 3). An initial cohort of 14 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with 75% of the calculated dose of carboplatin (29 evaluable courses) as a precaution against added myelosuppression from combination chemotherapy. The observed reduction in platelets was essentially equal to the reduction in platelets predicted if patients had received carboplatin alone. Subsequently, a second cohort of 20 evaluable patients with NSCLC received the full calculated dose of carboplatin and etoposide (51 evaluable courses). There was a linear relationship between observed (o) and predicted (p) reductions in platelets. With full-dose carboplatin in combination with etoposide, there was a significantly greater carboplatin dosage administered, greater reduction in platelets, and lower platelet nadir. Among 34 evaluable patients (80 courses) there was one complete response (CR) and four partial responses (PRs) for an overall response rate of 15% (90% confidence +/- 9%). The median duration of survival for responders was 336+ days and for nonresponders was 204+ days. Therapy was well tolerated. This study, in addition, supports our concept of individualized dosing of carboplatin and the underlying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships and represents an interesting pharmacodynamic and quantitative approach to studying potential drug-drug interactions and defining appropriate dosages for combination chemotherapy.

The palliative role of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of endocrine-resistant prostatic carcinoma has not been established. Conventional means of quantifying tumor response are most frequently not applicable in this disease because of the lack of measurable objective parameters to allow for a reliable estimation of antitumor effects. While this problem is not unique to prostatic carcinoma, this review illustrates its magnitude in this disease. Only approximately 5% of patients studied fulfill the various criteria for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or both, while the vast majority of patients reported as responders are actually in the stable disease category. Stable disease is highly questionable as an indicator of antitumor response and should not be used as a criterion for response in conventional phase II studies unless it is convincingly demonstrated that it occurs as a result of treatment. A study design that may allow a more reliable assessment of the value of the stable disease category is described in the text. More effective means for assessing tumor responses and better instruments to measure aspects of quality of life are needed. Review of several prospective randomized clinical trials showed that no treatment program tested during the last decade resulted in a survival advantage when compared with a concurrently treated control group. Furthermore, in two such trials, four different single chemotherapeutic agents widely used in the treatment of this disease (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, estramustine phosphate, and streptozocin) either alone or in combination, did not produce any prolongation of survival when compared to a no chemotherapy (standard treatment) control arm. Survival curves for endocrine-resistant patients fall within a relatively narrow and possibly predictable range that may be used as an additional endpoint in conjunction with response (CRs and PRs only) in phase II trials. More definitive evidence of therapeutic efficacy in this disease should derive from phase III trials using survival as one of the major endpoints. Because of the poor results observed with chemotherapy thus far, we suggest that the appropriate control arm for phase III testing in endocrine-resistant patients continues to be a no chemotherapy control arm consisting of a best symptomatic care or a uniformly applied second-line endocrine manipulation.

The prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) of the head and neck (H&N) depends on the primary site and anatomical extent of the disease. Recurrence rates after conventional surgery (S) and/or radiotherapy (RT) remain low for localized tumors, whereas in advanced loco-regional disease they occur in over 60% of all cases. Several combinations of treatment modalities have been attempted in order to improve local control in Stages III and IV. Unfortunately, the recurrence rate remains high with added morbidity when conventional surgery is combined with pre or post-operative radiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy (CT) with Cisplatinum and Bleomycin has resulted in severe toxicities when combined with radiotherapy. To evaluate the toxicity of Carboplatin (CBDCA), a second generation platinum analog, when given simultaneously with conventional doses of radiotherapy, 26 patients with Stage IV SQC of the head and neck were treated at the University of Maryland Medical Systems. There were 23 males and 3 females; median age was 59 years and median Karnofski performance status was 60. Twenty patients had received no prior therapy; six had surgical exploration and excision with measurable residual disease. Anatomically, six patients had tumors of the oral cavity, twelve in the pharynx, one in the nasopharynx, four in the larynx, one in the hypopharynx, one in the maxillary antrum, and one was an unknown primary. These patients were treated as out-patients with weekly injections of Carboplatin. The dose was escalated: two patients received 60 mg/M2, seven received 75 mg/M2, thirteen were treated with 100 mg/M2, and four with 400 mg/M2. The radiotherapy was given daily with conventional fractions of 180 cGy and total tumor doses of 60-75 Gy. Toxicities were mainly hematological with median nadirs decreasing with increasing doses of Carboplatin. Mucositis was seen in over 80% of the patients, but interestingly enough, it has never been more severe than that observed with radiotherapy alone. So far, there has not been any kidney, ear, or neurotoxicities. Of 25 evaluable patients, 19 (76%) responded with 13 (52%) showing complete response. The overall median survival time is 266+ days (324+ for responders and 179+ for non-responders). The follow-up is still short, 10-14 months, but 9 of 13 patients with complete response have not yet progressed.

ICRF-187 was given to 62 evaluable patients with advanced solid tumors in a Phase I clinical trial. Weekly infusions were given in dosages ranging from 0.85 g/m2 to 7.42 g/m2 for a total of four weeks with a two week rest period between courses. Dose-limiting hematological toxicity was seen in heavily pretreated patients at a dose of 3.8 g/m2/week. All patients also developed reversible SGOT elevations. In patients with less prior therapy hematologic toxicity was not dose-limiting but hepatotoxicity, manifest by transient SGOT levels greater than 5 times baseline was seen at 7.42 g/m2/week even though only 3/6 patients could receive 4 consecutive weekly doses. At virtually all dose levels tested some patients developed anemia. Other toxicities, including alopecia, nausea, vomiting and reversible serum amylase elevations, were mild. Cumulative monthly doses achieved on this weekly schedule are significantly higher than a 48-hour infusion or daily times 3 or 5 schedule in adults and a daily times 3 schedule in children. Pharmacokinetic studies in eight patients indicate that the drug disappears from the plasma biphasically with a terminal t1/2 of 3.2 +/- 0.9 hr. The total clearance was 288.7 +/- 85.0 ml/hr/kg and the volume of distribution (Vda) was 1.3 +/- 0.4 l/kg. Pharmacokinetics were not dose-dependent from 3.8-7.4 g/m2 and no difference in pharmacokinetics was found in patients studied during the first and second treatments of a course. If Phase II trials of ICRF-187 are to be pursued on this schedule, appropriate doses would be 3.8 g/m2/week X 4 for heavily pretreated and 7.42 g/m2/week for "good risk" patients. Because of erratic hematologic toxicity in heavily pretreated patients, some might only tolerate three weekly doses. In good risk patients transaminitis was significant but reversible, thus, Phase II protocols should include dose escalation schemata.

BackgroundFor patients with metastatic prostate cancer, treatment is primarily palliative, relying mainly on the suppression of systemic androgen hormone levels. To help document the achievement of palliation and to characterize positive and negative effects of treatment, we evaluated quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to two methods of androgen deprivation.MethodsPatients (n = 739) with stage M1 (bone or soft tissue metastasis) prostate cancer were enrolled in a QOL protocol that was a companion to Southwest Oncology Group INT-0105, a randomized double-blind trial comparing treatment with bilateral orchiectomy (surgical castration) plus either flutamide or placebo. Patients completed a comprehensive battery of QOL questionnaires at random assignment to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months later. Data were collected on three treatment-specific symptoms (diarrhea, gas pain, and body image), on physical functioning, and on emotional functioning. All P values are two-sided.ResultsQuestionnaire return rates for this study never dropped below 80%; only 2% of the patients did not submit baseline QOL assessments. Cross-sectional analyses (corrected for multiple testing) identified statistically significant differences that favored orchiectomy plus placebo for two of the five primary QOL parameters as follows: patients receiving flutamide reported more diarrhea at 3 months (P = .001) and worse emotional functioning at 3 and 6 months (both P

Background: Previous studies indicate that suramin may be an active agent for treatment of solid tumors. The clinical use of suramin is complicated by a broad spectrum of toxic effects and complex pharmacology. Studies have suggested that the dose-limiting neurotoxicity of this agent is closely related to sustained plasma drug concentrations of 350 micrograms/mL or more.Purpose: This phase I clinical trial in patients with solid tumors was designed to determine whether plasma concentrations resulting in both antitumor activity and manageable toxicity could be achieved with short, intermittent infusions of suramin.Methods: Thirty-seven patients, including 33 with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer, collectively received 43 courses of suramin designed to maintain a plasma concentration range of 200-300, 175-275, or 150-250 micrograms/mL. Patients received a test dose of 200 mg and an initial loading dose of 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of therapy. Subsequent suramin doses and schedules were individually determined using a strategy of adaptive control with feedback, which used a maximum a posteriori Bayesian algorithm to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Patients were treated until dose-limiting toxicity or progressive disease developed.Results: Thirty-five of the 37 study patients and 31 of the 33 with prostate cancer were assessable for toxicity and response. Treatment was discontinued in 28 patients because of dose-limiting toxicity consisting of a syndrome of malaise, fatigue, and lethargy; recurrent reduction in creatinine clearance of 50% or more; or axonal neuropathy. Evidence of major antitumor activity was observed in patients with prostate cancer treated at all three plasma drug concentrations. Measurable responses (one complete response and five partial responses) were noted in six of 12 patients with measurable disease. Twenty-four (77%) of 31 patients had a reduction in prostate-specific antigen of 50% or more, and 17 (55%) of 31 had a reduction of 75% or more. Twenty (83%) of 24 patients reported reduction in pain.Conclusions: Suramin can be safely administered as an intermittent bolus injection by use of adaptive control with feedback to control plasma drug concentrations; toxicity is significant but manageable and reversible. Suramin is active against hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Implications: Future trials should address the role and necessary extent of therapeutic drug monitoring; the optimal plasma drug concentration range and duration of therapy; and the activity of suramin in combination with other agents, in earlier stages of prostate cancer, and in other tumor types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]