Search

A murine P388 leukemia line fully resistant to thiarabine was obtained after five courses of intraperitoneal treatment (daily for nine consecutive days). The subline was sensitive as was the parental P388/0 line to 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, melphalan, BCNU, mitomycin C, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide, irinotecan, vincristine, and paclitaxel, but was cross resistant (at least marginally) to three antimetabolites: palmO-ara-C, fludarabine phosphate, and methotrexate. The deoxycytidine kinase activity in the subline was comparable to that for P388/0, whereas the dCMP deaminase activity was 43% of that for P388/0. No deoxycytidine deaminase activity was detected in either of the leukemias. There appeared to be little, if any, difference in the metabolism of deoxycytidine, cytidine, or thiarabine in the two leukemias.

Clofarabine, an approved anticancer drug, was evaluated in combination with radiation in six subcutaneously implanted human tumor xenograft models. Clofarabine had no effect on the growth of SF-295 glioblastoma, which was not enhanced by radiation. There was no difference between clofarabine with and without radiation in the DU-145 prostate model. The combined effect on NCI-H460 lung tumors appeared to be additive. SR475 head and neck, PANC-1 pancreatic, and HCT-116 colon tumors were radiomodified by clofarabine. The radiomodifying capacity of clofarabine was superior to that for gemcitabine in two models (PANC-1 and HCT-116) and was comparable in the other four models.

Thiarabine was evaluated for antitumor activity in seven human leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma xenograft models to explore the activity in hematological malignancies. Thiarabine was active against all of the human leukemia and lymphoma lines tested, being curative against HL-60 leukemia and AS283 lymphoma and effecting tumor regressions in CCRF-CEM, MOLT-4, and K-562 leukemia and RL lymphoma models, but did not exhibit any appreciable activity against RPMI-8226 myeloma. For the leukemia/lymphoma models, thiarabine was more efficacious than ara-C/palmO-ara-C (four models), clofarabine (three models), fludarabine monophosphate (five models), cladribine (four models), and gemcitabine (six models). Thiarabine warrants future clinical trials with leukemias/lymphomas.

A murine P388 leukemia line fully resistant to clofarabine was obtained after only two courses of intraperitoneal treatment (three times a day for nine consecutive days). The resistance was stable for at least 13 weeks without treatment. The subline was as sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, melphalan, BCNU, doxorubicin, etoposide, irinotecan, vincristine, and docetaxel as was the parental P388/0 line but was cross-resistant to five antimetabolites [palmO-ara-C, 4'-thio-ara-C, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine, and gemcitabine-all of which require deoxycytidine kinase for activation] and paclitaxel. The subline had less than 1% of the deoxycytidine kinase activity in comparison to P388/0.

Purpose: 4'-Thio-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (4'-thio-ara-C), which has shown a broad spectrum of antitumor activity against human tumor systems in mice and is undergoing clinical trials, was evaluated for cross-resistance to seven clinical agents in order to identify potentially useful guides for patient selection for further clinical trials of 4'-thio-ara-C and possible noncross-resistant drug combinations with 4'-thio-ara-C., Methods: A drug resistance profile for 4'-thio-ara-C, which was administered intraperitoneally daily for nine consecutive days, was obtained using seven drug-resistant P388 and L1210 leukemias that were implanted intraperitoneally in mice., Results: Multidrug-resistant P388 leukemias (leukemias resistant to doxorubicin, etoposide, or paclitaxel) exhibited no cross-resistance to 4'-thio-ara-C. Leukemias resistant to camptothecin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil were also not cross-resistant to 4'-thio-ara-C. Only the leukemia resistant to 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine was cross-resistant to 4'-thio-ara-C., Conclusions: The data suggest that (1) it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and (2) the lack of cross-resistance seen with 4'-thio-ara-C may contribute to therapeutic synergism when 4'-thio-ara-C is combined with other agents.

Diverse physiological and therapeutic insults that increase the amount of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) induce the unfolded protein response, an evolutionarily conserved protective mechanism that manages ER stress. Glucose-regulated protein 78/immunoglobulin heavy-chain binding protein (GRP78/BiP) is an ER-resident protein that plays a central role in the ER stress response and is the only known substrate of the proteolytic A subunit (SubA) of a novel bacterial AB(5) toxin. Here, we report that an engineered fusion protein, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-SubA, combining EGF and SubA, is highly toxic to growing and confluent epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing cancer cells, and its cytotoxicity is mediated by a remarkably rapid cleavage of GRP78/BiP. Systemic delivery of EGF-SubA results in a significant inhibition of human breast and prostate tumor xenografts in mouse models. Furthermore, EGF-SubA dramatically increases the sensitivity of cancer cells to the ER stress-inducing drug thapsigargin, and vice versa, demonstrating the first example of mechanism-based synergism in the action of a cytotoxin and an ER-targeting drug.

Purpose: Clofarabine increases the activation of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl cytosine (araC) in tumor cells, and combination of these two drugs has been shown to result in good clinical activity against various hematologic malignancies. 1-beta-D-[4-thio-arabinofuranosyl] cytosine (T-araC) is a new cytosine analog that has exhibited excellent activity against a broad spectrum of human solid tumors and leukemia/lymphoma xenografts in mice and is currently being evaluated in patients as a new drug for the treatment of cancer. Since T-araC has a vastly superior preclinical efficacy profile in comparison to araC, we have initiated studies to determine the potential value of clofarabine/T-araC combination therapy., Methods: In vitro studies have been conducted to determine the effect of clofarabine on the metabolism of T-araC, and in vivo studies have been conducted to determine the effect of the clofarabine/T-araC combination on five human tumor xenografts in mice., Results: Initial studies with various tumor cells in culture indicated that a 2-h incubation with clofarabine enhanced the metabolism of T-araC 24 h after its removal by threefold in three tumor cell types (HCT-116 colon, K562 leukemia, and RL lymphoma) and by 1.5-fold in two other tumor cell types (MDA-MB-435 breast (melanoma), and HL-60 leukemia). Pretreatment with clofarabine resulted in a slight decrease in metabolism of T-araC in RPMI-8226 myeloma cells (65% of control) and inhibited metabolism of T-araC in CCRF-CEM leukemia cells by 90%. In vivo combination studies were conducted with various human tumor xenografts to determine whether or not the modulations observed in vitro were reflective of the in vivo situation. Clofarabine and T-araC were administered on alternate days for five treatments each (q2dx5) with the administration of T-araC 24 h after each clofarabine treatment. Combination treatment of HCT-116, K562, HL-60, or RL tumors with clofarabine and T-araC resulted in dramatically superior anti-tumor activity than treatment with either agent alone, whereas this combination resulted in antagonism in CCRF-CEM tumors. The in vivo antitumor activity of clofarabine plus T-araC against HCT-116 tumors was much better than the activity seen with clofarabine plus araC., Conclusions: These studies provide a rationale for clinical trials using this combination in the treatment of acute leukemias as well as solid tumors and suggest that this combination would exhibit greater antitumor activity than that of clofarabine plus araC.

Seven new (2-chloroethyl)nitrosocarbamates have been synthesized as potential anticancer alkylating agents. These compounds were designed with carrier moieties that would either act as prodrugs or confer water solubility. All compounds were screened in an in vitro panel of five human tumor cell lines: CAKI-1 (renal), DLD-1 (colon), NCI-H23 (lung), SK-MEL-28 (melanoma), and SNB-7 (CNS). Several agents showed good activity with IC(50) values in the range of 1-10 microg/mL against at least two of the cell lines. One compound, carbamic acid, (2-chloroethyl)nitroso-4-acetoxybenzyl ester (3), was selected for further study in vivo against intraperitoneally implanted P388 murine leukemia. In addition to the aforementioned compound, both carbamic acid, (2-chloroethyl)nitroso-4-nitrobenzyl ester (9) and carbamic acid, (2-chloroethyl)nitroso-2,3,4, 6-tetra-O-acetyl-1-alpha,beta-D-glucopyranose ester (24) were evaluated against subcutaneously implanted M5076 murine sarcoma in mice. None of these compounds were active in vivo.

The antimicrotubule agent taxol (NSC 125973) has shown clinical antitumor activity against several classically refractory tumors. We developed a drug-resistance profile for taxol using ten drug-resistant P388 leukemias to identify potentially useful guides for patient selection for further clinical trials of taxol and possible non-cross-resistant drug combinations with taxol. Multidrug-resistant P388 leukemias exhibited either clear (leukemia resistant to amsacrine) or marginal cross-resistance (leukemias resistant to doxorubicin, actinomycin D, and mitoxantrone) to taxol. Leukemias resistant to vincristine (non-multidrug-resistant leukemia), camptothecin, melphalan, cisplatin, 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, and methotrexate were not cross-resistant to taxol. The data suggest that (1) it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with amsacrine, doxorubicin, actinomycin D, or mitoxantrone and (2) a combination of one of the non-cross-resistant drugs and taxol might exhibit therapeutic synergism.

Since 1978, over 50 clinically useful antitumor drugs or new candidate antitumor agents have been evaluated in vivo against cisplatin-resistant P388 leukemia (P388/DDPt) in our laboratories. Analysis of this data base has yielded insights into the cross-resistance, collateral sensitivity, and mechanisms of resistance of P388/DDPt. P388/DDPt was cross-resistant or marginally cross-resistant to eight agents [carmethizole.HCl, rhizoxin, dibromodulcitol, spirohydantoin mustard, hepsulfam, arabinosyl-5-azacytosine (ara-AC), tiazofurin, and deoxyspergualin]. Of these eight agents, the latter six have entered various phases of clinical trials. For these trials, it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with cisplatin. P388/DDPt was collaterally sensitive to six agents [fludarabine phosphate (2-F-ara-AMP), amsacrine (AMSA), mitoxantrone, etoposide (VP-16), batracylin, and flavone acetic acid] and, possibly, to two others (merbarone and echinomycin). These observations of collateral sensitivity suggest that a combination of cisplatin plus any one of these drugs might exhibit therapeutic synergism. Therapeutic synergism has been observed in animal models for combinations of cisplatin plus VP-16, AMSA, or mitoxantrone. The observation of collateral sensitivity for P388/DDPt to four agents (AMSA, mitoxantrone, merbarone, and VP-16) that have been reported to interact with DNA topoisomerase II suggests the possible involvement of the latter in cisplatin resistance. Both the increased sensitivity of P388/DDPt to these agents and a portion of its resistance to cisplatin could be the result of an increase in DNA topoisomerase II activity.