Search

One of the primary objectives of a dose-finding trial for novel anti-cancer agent combination therapies, such as molecular targeted agents and immune-oncology therapies, is to identify optimal dose combinations that are tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. The goal differs from that of a dose-finding trial for traditional cytotoxic agents, in which the goal is to determine the maximum tolerated dose combinations. This paper proposes the new design, named 'BOIN-ETC' design, to identify optimal dose combinations based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes using the waterfall approach. The BOIN-ETC design is model-assisted, so it is expected to be robust, and straightforward to implement in actual oncology dose-finding trials. These characteristics are quite valuable from a practical perspective. Simulation studies show that the BOIN-ETC design has advantages compared with the other approaches in the percentage of correct optimal dose combination selection and the average number of patients allocated to the optimal dose combinations across various realistic settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

One of the primary objectives of an oncology dose-finding trial for novel therapies, such as molecular-targeted agents and immune-oncology therapies, is to identify an optimal dose (OD) that is tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. These new therapeutic agents appear more likely to induce multiple low or moderate-grade toxicities than dose-limiting toxicities. Besides, for efficacy, evaluating the overall response and long-term stable disease in solid tumors and considering the difference between complete remission and partial remission in lymphoma are preferable. It is also essential to accelerate early-stage trials to shorten the entire period of drug development. However, it is often challenging to make real-time adaptive decisions due to late-onset outcomes, fast accrual rates, and differences in outcome evaluation periods for efficacy and toxicity. To solve the issues, we propose a time-to-event generalized Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose finding, accounting for efficacy and toxicity grades. The new design named "TITE-gBOIN-ET" design is model-assisted and straightforward to implement in actual oncology dose-finding trials. Simulation studies show that the TITE-gBOIN-ET design significantly shortens the trial duration compared with the designs without sequential enrollment while having comparable or higher performance in the percentage of correct OD selection and the average number of patients allocated to the ODs across various realistic settings., (© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

One of the primary objectives of an oncology dose-finding trial for novel therapies, such as molecular targeted agents and immune-oncology therapies, is to identify an optimal dose (OD) that is tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. These new therapeutic agents appear more likely to induce multiple low- or moderate-grade toxicities than dose-limiting toxicities. Besides, efficacy should be evaluated as an overall response and stable disease in solid tumors and the difference between complete remission and partial remission in lymphoma. This paper proposes the generalized Bayesian optimal interval design for dose-finding accounting for efficacy and toxicity grades. The new design, named "gBOIN-ET" design, is model-assisted, simple, and straightforward to implement in actual oncology dose-finding trials than model-based approaches. These characteristics are quite valuable in practice. A simulation study shows that the gBOIN-ET design has advantages compared with the other model-assisted designs in the percentage of correct OD selection and the average number of patients allocated to the ODs across various realistic settings., (© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background and Objective: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements (ALKr) resulting in EML4-ALK proteins occur in a subset of solid tumors and are targeted by ALK inhibitors. Given the development of drug resistance to ALK inhibitors, ALK inhibitors with different kinase selectivity are required., Methods: This phase I, non-randomized, open-label study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of ASP3026, a second-generation ALK inhibitor, in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Between 1 June 2011 and 20 January 2014, 29 patients received different daily doses of ASP3026 in the escalation (25 mg, n = 3; 50 mg, n = 3; 75 mg, n = 3; 125 mg, n = 4; 200 mg, n = 3; or 325 mg, n = 7) and expansion (200 mg, n = 6) cohorts., Results: Three patients had DLTs at the 325-mg dose: cataract exacerbation, increased aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase, and impaired hepatic function (all Grade 3 severity). Thus, the maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg. The treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was 100%; the most common events were nausea (n = 8, 27.6%), decreased appetite (n = 10, 34.5%), and fatigue (n = 9, 31.0%) of mild or moderate severity. Six patients were positive for ALK protein and three had ALKr. Two patients achieved partial responses: one with Ewing sarcoma (75-mg dose group) and one with an ALKr-positive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (125-mg dose group)., Conclusion: ASP3026 at a 200-mg dose may provide therapeutic benefit for patients with solid tumors, with a tolerable safety profile., Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01401504 on July 25, 2011.

Background: Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review., Results: In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75-91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2-not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported., Conclusion: Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS., Trial Registration: The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

One of the primary purposes of an oncology dose-finding trial is to identify an optimal dose (OD) that is both tolerable and has an indication of therapeutic benefit for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. In addition, it is quite important to accelerate early stage trials to shorten the entire period of drug development. However, it is often challenging to make adaptive decisions of dose escalation and de-escalation in a timely manner because of the fast accrual rate, the difference of outcome evaluation periods for efficacy and toxicity and the late-onset outcomes. To solve these issues, we propose the time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on cumulative and pending data of both efficacy and toxicity. The new design, named "TITE-BOIN-ET" design, is nonparametric and a model-assisted design. Thus, it is robust, much simpler, and easier to implement in actual oncology dose-finding trials compared with the model-based approaches. These characteristics are quite useful from a practical point of view. A simulation study shows that the TITE-BOIN-ET design has advantages compared with the model-based approaches in both the percentage of correct OD selection and the average number of patients allocated to the ODs across a variety of realistic settings. In addition, the TITE-BOIN-ET design significantly shortens the trial duration compared with the designs without sequential enrollment and therefore has the potential to accelerate early stage dose-finding trials., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

ASP5878 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs). This study investigated safety, tolerability, and antitumor effect of single and multiple oral doses of ASP5878 in patients with solid tumors. This phase 1, open label, first-in-human study comprised dose-escalation and dose-expansion parts. Primary objectives of the dose-escalation part were to identify the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, and recommended dose of ASP5878 for the dose-expansion part. Nine dose cohorts of ASP5878 were evaluated (0.5─2 mg once daily; 2─40 mg twice daily [BID]). A single dose of ASP5878 was followed by a 2-day pharmacokinetic collection, and then either 28-day cycles of daily dosing (ASP5878 ≤ 10 mg BID) or 5-day dosing/2-day interruption (ASP5878 ≥ 20 mg BID). The primary objective of the dose-expansion part was to determine the safety of ASP5878 (16 mg BID) administered in 28-day cycles of 5-day dosing/2-day interruption in patients with urothelial carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, or squamous cell lung carcinoma with FGFR genetic alterations. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Thirty-five patients were enrolled and 31 discontinued in the dose-escalation part; 51 patients were enrolled and 51 discontinued in the dose-expansion part. In the dose-escalation part, 66.7% of patients in the 20 mg BID 5-day dosing/2-day interruption group reported DLTs of hyperphosphatemia. The recommended dose for the dose-expansion part was 16 mg BID. Common AEs included retinal detachment, diarrhea, and increased alanine aminotransferase. One death occurred that was not related to ASP5878. ASP5878 was well tolerated with manageable toxicities including hyperphosphatemia.

Background: The original aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment sequence and anthracycline requirement in docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab therapy. After one death in the anthracycline-containing arm, the protocol was amended to terminate the randomization. The single-docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arm was continued to examine the efficacy and safety of the anthracycline-free regimen., Methods: Women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive, operable and primary breast cancer were randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (four cycles) followed by docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab (four cycles), or docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, or docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab (six cycles). After the protocol amendment, patients were allocated to the docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arm alone. The primary endpoint was a pathological complete response., Results: In total, 103 patients were enrolled between September 2009 and September 2011: 21, 22 and 24 patients in the 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab; docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arms, respectively, and 36 patients in the docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arm after the protocol amendment. In total, 60 patients were allocated to the docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arm, in which the pathological complete response rate was 45.8%, and disease-free survival at 3 years was 96.6%. Patients with stage I or IIA in the docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab arm showed good disease-free survival (100% at 3 years). The comparison of efficacy among the three arms was statistically underpowered. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly after 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab (P = 0.017), but not after docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide or docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab., Conclusions: The pathological complete response rate for docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab was similar to previous reports of anthracycline-containing regimens. Docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab might be an option for primary systemic therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive early breast cancer. A larger confirmatory study is necessary., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Liquid biopsy has been approved as an optional method to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical significance of its utility for monitoring the disease remains elusive. WJOG8114LTR is a prospective, multi-institutional study of liquid biopsy in EGFR mutated patients with NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy naïve, advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR -sensitizing mutation received afatinib 40 mg/body until progressive disease (PD). Plasma DNA was obtained from patients at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and at PD. Three types of clinically relevant EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion, exon 20 T790 M and exon 21 L858R) will be analyzed using plasma DNA with multiplexed, digital PCR assay. This study was registered at UMIN 000015847., Results: Fifty-seven patients were registered in the study. At baseline, 62.5% of patients were positive for EGFR mutation in plasma, and systemic spread of the tumor seemed to correlate with higher detection rate. After treatment, negative conversion of sensitive mutation within four weeks was observed among 87.5% of the patients. These patients demonstrated statistically significant longer progression-free survival than those who did not achieve negative conversion (13.6 months versus 5.1 months, p < 0.0001). Regarding progression, 35.7% of the patients showed recurrence in plasma DNA earlier than radiological progression. However, PFS curve based on plasma recurrence did not show significant difference than that based on RECIST., Conclusion: To predict durable efficacy and progression, liquid biopsy was useful in a part of EGFR mutated NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment-free remission (TFR), the ability to maintain a molecular response (MR), occurs in approximately 50% of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Methods: A multicenter phase 2 trial (Delightedly Overcome CML Expert Stop TKI Trial: DOMEST Trial) was conducted to test the safety and efficacy of discontinuing imatinib. Patients with CML with a sustained MR of 4.0 or MR4.0-equivalent for at least 2 years and confirmed MR4.0 at the beginning of the study were enrolled. In the TFR phase, the international scale (IS) was regularly monitored by IS-PCR testing. Molecular recurrence was defined as the loss of MR4.0. Recurrent patients were immediately treated with dasatinib or other TKIs including imatinib., Results: Of 110 enrolled patients, 99 were evaluable. The median time from diagnosis to discontinuation of imatinib was 103 months, and the median duration of imatinib therapy was 100 months. Molecular recurrence-free survival rates were 69.6%, 68.6% and 64.3% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. After discontinuation of imatinib therapy, 26 patients showed molecular recurrence, and 25 re-achieved deep MR after dasatinib treatment. Molecular response MR4.0 was achieved in 23 patients within 6 months and 25 patients within 12 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that a longer time from diagnosis to discontinuation of imatinib therapy (p = 0.0002) and long duration of imatinib therapy (p = 0.0029) predicted a favorable prognosis., Conclusions: This DOMEST Trial showed the feasibility of TKI discontinuation in a Japanese clinical setting.

Background: In the ABSOLUTE trial, weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (w-nab-PTX) showed non-inferiority to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (w-sb-PTX) for overall survival (OS). Thus, w-nab-PTX might be an option for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, predictive factors for efficacies of these agents have not been evaluated., Methods: Patients previously enrolled in the ABSOLUTE trial were divided into apparent peritoneal metastasis group (PM group) and no apparent peritoneal metastasis group (no PM group) based on baseline imaging evaluated by RECIST ver. 1.1 criteria and amount of ascites. OS, progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared between two arms in each group., Results: This study included 240 and 243 patients in the w-nab-PTX and w-sb-PTX arms, respectively. In the PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 88) had longer OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 103), and median survival time (MST) of 9.9 and 8.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88; P = 0.0060], respectively. In the no PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 140) had shorter OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 152), and MST of 11.6 and 15.7 months (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.06-1.86; P = 0.0180), respectively. After adjusting for prognostic factors, the HR for OS in the w-nab-PTX arm versus the w-sb-PTX arm was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83; P = 0.0023; PM group) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.78; P = 0.0414; no PM group), with significant interaction between treatment efficacy and presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.0003)., Conclusions: The presence of apparent peritoneal metastasis might be a predictive factor for selecting w-nab-PTX for pretreated AGC patients., Trial Registration Number: JapicCTI-132059.

The main purpose of a phase I dose-finding study in the field of oncology is to evaluate toxicity and pharmacokinetic (PK) data and to estimate the optimal dose (OD) for subsequent clinical trials. From a pharmacological perspective, PK information is considered as an appropriate indicator for evaluating the degree of drug intervention in humans. Dose proportionality is typically assessed to investigate the PK properties of a drug. If we rely solely on the dose-exposure relationship, then when this relationship is not proportional, eg, if there is saturation of drug elimination or absorption, the performance of OD selection may be affected. This may be because any exposure ratio between two dose levels differs from the dose ratio between the dose levels. In addition, large inter-individual variability in exposure affects the occurrence of toxicity. Therefore, incorporating PK assessment in a phase I dose-finding trial may enable us to more precisely estimate OD. In most oncology dose-finding clinical trials, however, the result of PK analysis is not explicitly incorporated in the dose-finding determination analysis. In this study, we propose a Bayesian approach to incorporating PK assessment into OD estimation in a dose-finding trial. Our proposed approach incorporates into the statistical model an adjustment based on the latest area under the time-concentration curve assessment. The simulation study shows that compared with standard methods, the proposed method may be better able to select the correct ODs across a variety of realistic settings., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASP8273 is a highly specific, irreversible, once-daily, oral, EGFR TKI that inhibits both activating and resistance mutations. This ASP8273 dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (NCT02192697) was undertaken in two phases. In phase I, Japanese patients (aged ≥20 years) with NSCLC previously treated with ≥1 EGFR TKI received escalating ASP8273 doses (25-600 mg) to assess safety/tolerability and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) by the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method. In phase II, adult patients with T790M-positive NSCLC in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan received ASP8273 at RP2D to further assess safety/tolerability and determine antitumor activity, which was evaluated according to Simon's two-stage design (threshold response = 30%, expected response = 50%, α = 0.05, β = 0.1). Overall, 121 (n = 45 [33W/12M] phase I, n = 76 [48W/28M]) phase 2) patients received ≥1 dose of ASP8273. In phase I, RP2D and MTD were established as 300 and 400 mg, respectively. As 27 of the 63 patients treated with ASP8273 300 mg achieved a clinical response, ASP8273 was determined to have antitumor activity. The overall response rate at week 24 in all patients was 42% (n = 32/76; 95% confidence interval, 30.9-54.0). Median duration of progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.6, upper bound not reached). The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event in phase II was diarrhea (57%, n = 43/76). ASP8273 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in Asian patients with both EGFR-activating and T790M mutations., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations occur in approximately 50% of East Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ASP8273 is an irreversible EGFR-TKI, given orally, that inhibits EGFR activating mutations and has shown clinical activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI-naïve Japanese adult patients (≥20 years) with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02500927). Patients received ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end-point was to determine the safety of ASP8273 300 mg; the secondary end-point was antitumor activity defined by RECIST version 1.1. Thirty-one patients (12 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years [range, 31-82 years]) with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were enrolled; as of 23 February 2016, 25 patients (81%) were still on study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87%) had an exon 19 deletion (n = 13, 42%) or an L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation, and two (7%) had an L861Q mutation. Five patients (16%) had other EGFR activating mutations, two had an activating mutation and the T790M resistance mutation. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (n = 24, 77%). All patients had at least one post-baseline scan; one patient (3%) achieved a confirmed complete response, 13 (42%) had a confirmed partial response, and 15 (48%) had confirmed stable disease (disease control rate, 94% [n = 29/31]) per investigator assessment. Once-daily ASP8273 at 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in TKI-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

One of the main purposes of a phase I dose-finding trial in oncology is to identify an optimal dose (OD) that is both tolerable and has an indication of therapeutic benefit for subjects in subsequent phase II and III trials. Many phase I dose-finding methods based solely on toxicity considerations have been proposed under the assumption that both toxicity and efficacy monotonically increase with the dose level. Such an assumption may not be necessarily the case, however, when evaluating the OD for molecular targeted, cytostatic, and biological agents, as well as immune-oncology therapy. To address this issue, we extend the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design, which is nonparametric and thus does not require the assumption used in model-based designs, in order to identify an OD based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The new design is named "BOIN-ET." A simulation study is presented that includes a comparison of this proposed method to the model-based approaches in terms of both efficacy and toxicity responses. The simulation shows that BOIN-ET has advantages in both the percentages of correct ODs selected and the average number of patients allocated to the ODs across a variety of realistic settings., (Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether schedule modification is safe and effective in patients intolerant to the standard eribulin dose and schedule., Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with both anthracycline and taxane and ≤ 3 prior regimens of chemotherapy for MBC received eribulin at the standard dose and schedule (1.4 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) in the first cycle; change of dosing schedule (1.4 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) was determined by change in neutrophil count, platelet count, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and non-hematological toxicity on day 8 of the first cycle or day 1 of the second cycle. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; primary endpoint), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated., Results: Of the 88 patients who were enrolled and received standard eribulin therapy in the first cycle, 42 patients were moved to the bi-weekly therapy group and 40 continued standard therapy. In the bi-weekly and standard therapy groups, mean relative dose intensity was 62.7 and 90.9%, CBR was 31.0 and 25.0%, median TTF was 81.5 and 75 days, and OS was 523 and 412 days, respectively. Neither group reported severe adverse events., Conclusion: This is the first study to show that a bi-weekly eribulin schedule is tolerable and has comparable efficacy in patients intolerant to the standard eribulin schedule., Clinical Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (ID: UMIN 000008491).

We consider the problem of incorporating historical data from a preceding trial to design and conduct a subsequent dose-finding trial in a possibly different population of patients. In oncology, for example, after a phase I dose-finding trial is completed in Caucasian patients, investigators often conduct a further phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose in Asian patients. This may be due to concerns about possible differences in treatment tolerability between populations. In this study, we propose to adaptively incorporate historical data into prior distributions assumed in a new dose-finding trial. Our proposed approach aims to appropriately borrow strength from a previous trial to improve the maximum tolerated dose determination in another patient population. We define a "historical-to-current (H-C)" parameter representing the degree of borrowing based on a retrospective analysis of previous trial data. In simulation studies, we examine the operating characteristics of the proposed method in comparison with 3 alternative approaches and assess how the H-C parameter functions across a variety of realistic settings., (Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Introduction: We previously reported an interim analysis of the DADI (dasatinib discontinuation) trial. The results showed that 48% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase who maintained a deep molecular response (DMR) for ≥ 1 year could discontinue second- or subsequent-line dasatinib treatment safely at a median follow-up of 20 months. However, the results from longer follow-up periods would be much more useful from a clinical perspective., Patients and Methods: The DADI trial was a prospective, multicenter trial conducted in Japan. After confirming a stable DMR for ≥ 1 year, dasatinib treatment subsequent to imatinib or nilotinib was discontinued. After discontinuation, the loss of DMR (even of 1 point) was defined as stringent molecular relapse, thereby triggering therapy resumption. The predictive factors of treatment-free remission (TFR) were analyzed., Results: The median follow-up period was 44.0 months (interquartile range, 40.5-48.0 months). The estimated overall TFR rate at 36 months was 44.4% (95% confidence interval, 32.0%-56.2%). Only 2 patients developed a molecular relapse after the 1-year cutoff point. The presence of imatinib resistance was a significant risk factor for molecular relapse. Moreover, high natural killer cell and low γδ + T-cell and CD4 + regulatory T-cell (CD25 + CD127 low ) counts before discontinuation correlated significantly with successful therapy discontinuation., Conclusion: These findings suggest that discontinuation of second- or subsequent-line dasatinib after a sustained DMR of ≥ 1 year is feasible, especially for patients with no history of imatinib resistance. In addition, the natural killer cell count was associated with the TFR., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been shown to be effective for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical trials. However, there is a lack of data from routine clinical practice. This study determined treatment and outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC treated in a real world setting., Materials and Methods: Clinical characteristics, information about NSCLC treatment regimens and survival outcomes data were obtained retrospectively from 17 medical centers across Japan. In addition to overall survival (OS), subgroup analyses were conducted based on first- and second-line treatments and combinations, and for patients who had survived >5 years from initiation of first-line treatment., Results: The full analysis set comprised 1656 patients (mean 67 years, 80.6% with performance status 0 or 1). Median follow-up was 29.5 months and median OS was 29.7 months; 3- and 5-year survival rates were 41.2% and 21.5%, respectively. Significant predictors of OS were younger age, no smoking history, histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, less advanced clinical stage, good performance status and major EGFR-activating mutation. Despite some imbalances in baseline characteristics, patients who received first-line chemotherapy had numerically higher 5-year survival rates than those who received first-line EGFR-TKIs., Conclusions: This large, long-term analysis of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients provides useful information about treatment outcomes in clinical practice. Updated analyses are required to determine real world outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with the latest available agents, including immunotherapies., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of the study was to test the efficacy of neoadjuvant palbociclib therapy and to evaluate its impact on cell cycle arrest and changes in EndoPredict (EP) scores before and after treatment. Postmenopausal women with histologically proven ER+ve, HER2-ve invasive breast cancer, 2 cm or greater, were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm study. Twenty eligible patients were given letrozole 2.5 mg per day together with palbociclib 125 mg per day for 3 out of 4 weeks in repeated cycles for 16 weeks (4 cycles) before surgery. The primary end points were clinical response rates (cRR) and preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI). The secondary end points were pathologic response and gene expression testing with EP test on collected tumor samples. The following results were obtained. 17 patients showed a clinical response of 50% or more, including 8 complete responses and 9 partial responses. There was significant reduction in area ( P  < 0.0001) and volume ( P  = 0.017) of the cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in one patient; all cancers were downgraded after treatment. Ki67 ( P  = 0.044) and EP scores ( P  < 0.0001) were significantly reduced after treatment. Analysis of the relative gene expression levels showed that all proliferative genes, IL6ST and RBBP8 were decreased after palbociclib treatment. 6 patients with intermediate and three patients with high PEPI risk scores were found to have low EPclin scores. All patients with high PEPI relapse risk score had high EPclin score. In conclusion, effective clinical response was demonstrated by neoadjuvant letrozole in combination with palbociclib. Compared with PEPI, EPclin might be a better parameter to estimate prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy., (© 2018 The authors.)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) improve the prognosis of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) by inducing substantial deep molecular responses (DMR); some patients have successfully discontinued TKI therapy after maintaining DMR for ≥1 year. In this cessation study, we investigated the optimal conditions for dasatinib discontinuation in patients who maintained DMR for ≥2 years. This study included 54 patients with CML who were enrolled in a D-STOP multicenter prospective trial, had achieved DMR, and had discontinued dasatinib after 2-year consolidation. Peripheral lymphocyte profiles were analyzed by flow cytometry. The estimated 12-month treatment-free survival (TFS) was 62.9% (95% confidence interval: 48.5%-74.2%). During dasatinib consolidation, the percentage of total lymphocytes and numbers of CD3 - CD56 + natural killer (NK) cells, CD16 + CD56 + NK cells and CD56 + CD57 + NK-large granular lymphocytes (LGL) were significantly higher in patients with molecular relapse after discontinuation but remained unchanged in patients without molecular relapse for >7 months. At the end of consolidation, patients whose total lymphocytes comprised <41% CD3 - CD56 + NK cells, <35% CD16 + CD56 + NK cells, or <27% CD56 + CD57 + NK-LGL cells had higher TFS relative to other patients (77% vs 18%; P < .0008; 76% vs 10%; P < .0001; 84% vs 46%; P = .0059, respectively). The increase in the number of these NK cells occurred only during dasatinib consolidation. In patients with DMR, dasatinib discontinuation after 2-year consolidation can lead to high TFS. This outcome depends significantly on a smaller increase in NK cells during dasatinib consolidation., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Orantinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of orantinib combined with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma., Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 75 sites in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, no extra-hepatic tumour spread, and Child-Pugh score of 6 or less were randomly assigned (1:1) by interactive web response system using a computer-generated sequence to receive orantinib or placebo, within 28 days of cTACE. Randomisation was stratified by region, Child-Pugh score (5 vs 6), alpha fetoprotein concentrations (<400 ng/mL vs ≥400 ng/mL), and size of the largest lesion (≤50 mm vs >50 mm). Orantinib at 200 mg, twice per day, or placebo was given orally until TACE failure or unacceptable toxicity. The patients, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the full analysis set (patients who had received at least one dose of study drug). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01465464, and has been terminated., Findings: Between Dec 10, 2010, and Nov 21, 2013, 889 patients were randomly assigned to receive either orantinib (445 patients; 444 treated) or placebo (444 patients; all treated). The study was ended at interim analysis for futility evaluation. Median follow-up was 17·3 months (IQR 11·3-26·4). There was no improvement in overall survival with orantinib compared with placebo (median 31·1 months [95% CI 26·5-34·5] vs 32·3 months [28·4-not reached]; hazard ratio 1·090, 95% CI 0·878-1·352; p=0·435). The main adverse events in the orantinib group were oedema, ascites, and elevation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases. The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or worse in the orantinib group included elevated aspartate aminotransferase (189 [43%] patients in the oratinib group, 161 [36%] patients in the placebo group), elevated alanine aminotransferase (150 [34%] patients in the oratinib group, 132 (30%) patients in the placebo group), and hypertension (47 [11%] patients in the oratinib group, 39 [9%] patients in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were reported in 200 (45%) patients in the orantinib group and 134 (30%) patients in the placebo group., Interpretation: Orantinib combined with cTACE did not improve overall survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma., Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of low-dose dasatinib therapy (50 mg once daily). Methods Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) who were being treated with low-dose imatinib (≤200 mg/day), but were resistant to this agent were enrolled in the current study (referred to as the LD-CML study). Results There subjects included 9 patients (4 men and 5 women); all were treated with dasatinib at a dose of 50 mg once daily. Among 8 patients who had not experienced major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL1 transcript ≤0.1% according to International Scale [IS]) at study enrollment, 5 attained MMR by 12 months. In particular, 3 of 9 patients demonstrated a deep molecular response (DMR; IS ≤0.0069%) by 18 months. Five patients developed lymphocytosis accompanied by cytotoxic lymphocyte predominance. There was no mortality or disease progression, and all continue to receive dasatinib therapy at 18 months with only 2 patients requiring dose reduction. Toxicities were mild-to-moderate, and pleural effusion was observed in 1 patient (grade 1). Conclusion Low-dose dasatinib can attain MMR and DMR without severe toxicity in patients with CML-CP who are unable to achieve MMR with low-dose imatinib. Switching to low-dose dasatinib should therefore be considered for patients in this setting, especially if they are otherwise considering a cessation of treatment.

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate via combined analysis the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed monotherapy for chemo-naïve elderly patients aged ≥80 with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: We conducted a combined analysis from two phase II studies of pemetrexed for chemo-naïve elderly (aged ≥75) (n = 47) and performance status 2 (n = 28) patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Population aged ≥80 (80+ Group) was compared to those aged 70-79 (70's Group)., Results: We analyzed a total of 66 patients (37 70s and 29 80+ Groups) after exclusion of 4 ineligible and 5 aged ≤69 patients. Overall response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival of 70s vs. 80+ Groups were 13.5 vs. 13.8% [p = not significant (NS)], 67.6 vs. 58.6% (p = 0.608), 3.7 months vs. 4.2 months (p = 0.5588) and 18.5 vs. 13.5 months (p = 0.2621), respectively. Non-hematological and hematological toxicities ≥grade 3 of 70s vs. 80+ Groups were 24 vs. 35% (p = 0.4192) and 49 vs. 52% (p = NS), respectively. Dose reduction and/or delay due to toxicities of 70s vs. 80+ Groups was 19 vs. 28% (p = 0.7784). Febrile neutropenia and interstitial lung disease were not observed. Treatment-related death (bacterial pneumonia) was confirmed in one (3%) of 29 80+ Group patients., Conclusions: Pemetrexed monotherapy demonstrated similar efficacy and safety between aged ≥80 and aged 70-79 populations. It could be a therapeutic option in clinical practice for elderly non-squamous NSCLC patients aged ≥80 without indications of carboplatin-based combination regimens or docetaxel monotherapy.

Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non-small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs., Patients and Methods: Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib)., Conclusion: The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Lentinan (LNT) is a purified β-1, 3-glucan that augments immune responses. The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of LNT in combination with S-1 as a first-line treatment for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive S-1 alone or S-1 plus LNT. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end-points were time-to-treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), safety, quality of life (QOL), and biomarker. The percentages of LNT-binding monocytes in peripheral blood prior to treatment were analysed for the biomarker assessment., Results: One hundred and fifty-four and 155 patients were randomly assigned to receive S-1 alone or S-1 plus LNT, respectively. The median OS was 13.8 and 9.9 months (P = 0.208), the median TTF was 4.3 and 2.6 months (P < 0.001), the ORR was 22.3% and 18.7% for the S-1 and S-1 plus LNT groups, respectively. The incidences of haematologic and non-haematologic adverse events were similar, and no significant changes in QOL scores were observed during the treatment in both groups. In a subpopulation of patients with LNT-binding monocytes ≥2%, patients who received more than two cycles of chemotherapy showed a longer survival time in the S-1 plus LNT group., Conclusions: OS did not improve and TTF was significantly worse in the S-1 plus LNT group as compared with the S-1-only group. This study showed no efficacy of LNT when combined with S-1 treatment in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer., Clinical Trial Registration Id Number: UMIN 000000574., (Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to construct a prognostic model to predict survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) receiving palliative chemotherapy using readily available pretreatment factors., Methods: The model was constructed using data from 306 consecutive patients with APC who received palliative chemotherapy between January 2006 and March 2013. The predictive accuracy of the model was assessed using a concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves., Results: Among the 12 potential prognostic factors investigated, multivariate analysis identified the following six independent negative prognostic factors-performance status (PS), the presence of distant metastatic disease, the status of initially unresectable disease, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). A prognostic index (PI) based on the coefficients of these factors was constructed as follows-PI = 2 (if PS 2-3) + 1 (if distant metastatic disease) + 1 (if initially unresectable disease) + 1 (if CEA level ≥5.0 ng/ml) + 1 (if CA 19-9 level ≥1,000 U/ml) + 2 (if NLR ≥5). The patients were classified into three prognostic groups-favorable (PI 0-1, n = 73), intermediate (PI 2-3, n = 145), and poor (PI 4-8, n = 88). The median overall survival times for each prognostic group were 16.5, 12.3, and 6.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Bootstrapping verified the good fitness of this model for predicting 1-year survival, and the c-index was 0.658., Conclusions: This simple prognostic model could help clinicians to estimate survival in patients with APC who receive palliative chemotherapy.

Background: First-line imatinib treatment can be successfully discontinued in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia after deep molecular response has been sustained for at least 2 years. We investigated the safety and efficacy of discontinuing second-line or subsequent dasatinib after at least 1 year of deep molecular response., Methods: The Dasatinib Discontinuation trial was a prospective multicentre trial done in Japan. Eligible patients taking dasatinib and with confirmed stable deep molecular response were enrolled between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2012. All patients received dasatinib consolidation therapy for at least 1 year. In those with sustained deep molecular response, dasatinib was discontinued. Patients were followed up every month in year 1 (clinical cutoff), every 3 months in year 2, and every 6 months in year 3 for deep molecular response and immunological profiles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment-free remission at 6 months after discontinuation. Molecular relapse was defined as loss of deep molecular response at any assessment. This study is registered, number UMIN000005130., Findings: 88 patients were enrolled in the consolidation phase, 24 were excluded from the discontinuation phase due to fluctuations in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels. One patient was excluded because of positive expression of major and minor BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia cells and the detection of minor BCR-ABL1 transcripts during consolidation. Thus, 63 patients discontinued dasatinib treatment. The 25 patients who were excluded from discontinuation continued to receive dasatinib and none showed disease progression. Median follow-up was 20.0 months (IQR 16.5-24.0). Of the 63 patients who discontinued and were not excluded, 30 patients maintained deep molecular response while 33 patients had molecular relapses, all within the first 7 months after discontinuation. The estimated overall treatment-free remission was 49% (95% CI 36-61) at 6 months. No severe treatment-related toxic effects were seen. Treatment was restarted in the 33 patients with relapse; rapid molecular responses were seen in all 33 patients, of whom 29 (88%) regained deep molecular response within 3 months, as did the remaining four by 6 months., Interpretation: Dasatinib discontinuation after sustained deep molecular response for more than 1 year is feasible., Funding: Epidemiological and Clinical Research Information Network (ECRIN)., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Programmed death-1 (PD-1), a coinhibitory immune signal receptor expressed in T cells, binds to PD-1 ligand and regulates antitumor immunity. Nivolumab is an anti-PD-1 antibody that blocks PD-1 signaling. We assessed the safety and antitumor activity of nivolumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer., Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were treated with an intravenous infusion of nivolumab every 2 weeks at a dose of 1 or 3 mg/kg (constituting two 10-patient cohorts) from October 21, 2011. This phase II trial defined the primary end point as the best overall response. Patients received up to six cycles (four doses per cycle) of nivolumab treatment or received doses until disease progression occurred. Twenty nivolumab-treated patients were evaluated at the end of the trial on December 7, 2014., Results: Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in eight (40%) of 20 patients. Two patients had severe adverse events. In the 20 patients in whom responses could be evaluated, the best overall response was 15%, which included two patients who had a durable complete response (in the 3-mg/kg cohort). The disease control rate in all 20 patients was 45%. The median progression-free survival time was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.9 months), and the median overall survival time was 20.0 months (95% CI, 7.0 months to not reached) at study termination., Conclusion: This study, to our knowledge, is the first to explore the effects of nivolumab against ovarian cancer. The encouraging safety and clinical efficacy of nivolumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer indicate the merit of additional large-scale investigations (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000005714)., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Dasatinib is one of the key treatment options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Increase in lymphocyte counts has been known to be predictive of a good treatment response under dasatinib treatment as a second line therapy. However, clinical significance of lymphocyte dynamics in the upfront setting has yet to be clarified. To investigate the significance of lymphocyte dynamics in newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP)-CML, patient data of D-First study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01464411) were analyzed. Fifty-two CML-CP patients enrolled to this study were treated with dasatinib (100 mg day(-1) ) and all were followed-up for 18 months. The incidence of lymphocyosis was observed in 14 (27%), but it was not associated with deep molecular response achievement. However, natural killer (NK) cell or cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) counts at 1 month were significantly higher in patients with deep molecular response (DMR) by 18 months compared to those without DMR. When the patients were divided into two groups according to those calculated thresholds by receiver operating characteristic curve (407/μL for NK cells and 347/μL for CTLs), the cumulative DMR rates by 18 months were significantly better in higher value group compared to lower value group. In contrast, regulatory T cell counts were significantly lower at 12 and 15 months in patients achieved DMR. These results suggest the presence of dual effects of dasatinib on immune system through the cytotoxic lymphocytes activation and Treg deregulation in different periods in newly diagnosed CML-CP., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Low-dose erlotinib may be as effective as gefitinib or erlotinib at full dose in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene., Methods: Patients with chemotherapy pretreated NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations received erlotinib at 50 mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The dose was escalated to 150 mg/d in patients showing no response (i.e. without major tumour shrinkage according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)) to the initial dose during the first 4 weeks. The primary end-point was the objective response rate at the dose of 50 mg/d., Results: Thirty-four patients from seven institutes were enrolled. The study was closed early when no response was confirmed in 15 patients, excluding the possibility that the primary end-point would be met. The objective response and disease control rates at the dose of 50 mg/d as determined by an independent review committee were 54.5% and 84.8%, respectively. Four additional patients achieved partial response with increased 150 mg/d dose. Progression-free survival and median survival times during the entire period of the study were 9.5 and 28.5 months, respectively. Treatment-related toxicities were generally mild, the most common being skin disorders and diarrhoea. Only one case experienced grade 3 toxicity, which was transient increase of hepatic enzymes., Conclusion: The primary end-point was not met; low-dose erlotinib is not recommended for fit patients with NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations. However, it may merit further evaluation for elderly or frail patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous large trials with trastuzumab (TZM) showed improved outcome in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of TZM in Japanese patients have not been fully evaluated. We have therefore conducted an observational study in Japan., Methods: This was a retrospective and a prospective observational study in which data on women with histologically confirmed HER2-positive invasive breast cancer who received TZM for stage I-IIIC disease were collected from 56 institutions that participated in the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group and the efficacy of each treatment regimen analyzed., Results: A total of 2,024 patients treated between July 2009 and June 2011 were initially enrolled in this study; in August 2013, the patient cohort comprised 2,009 patients. Of these, 142 (7.5 %) were aged ≥70 years, 1,097 (58.1 %) had clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer, and 883 (47.4 %) were estrogen receptor-positive. Treatment options were neoadjuvant therapy (662 patients) and adjuvant therapy with TZM (1,228 patients). Three-year overall survival (OS) rates in the entire cohort and in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts, respectively, were 98.9 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 98.2-99.3], 98.3 (95 % CI 96.8-99.1 %), and 99.2 % (95 % CI 98.4-99.6), respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates in the entire cohort and in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts, respectively were 94.2 (95 % CI 93.0-95.2), 94.8 (95 % CI 93.0-95.9), and 93.1 (95 % CI 90.7-94.9 %), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age and nodal status negatively correlated with DFS. Age was the only factor which correlated with OS rate. Adverse events (AEs) associated with TZM and grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 356 (18.8 %) and 14 (0.6 %) patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 cardiac toxicities were reported in 11 patients., Conclusion: Based on data from our patient cohort of Japanese women with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, the efficacy and safety of systemic therapy with TZM are comparable to data from previously conducted large trials. Progress in anti-HER2 therapy for patients aged ≥70 years who have a poorer prognosis is needed.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed monotherapy in chemo-naïve Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type or unknown advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Pemetrexed was administered at 500 mg/m(2) triweekly until progression with supplementations in chemo-naïve ECOG PS 2 patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown advanced non-squamous NSCLC., Results: Between September 2009 and April 2013, twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 75 (range 59-89). Nineteen (68 %) of 28 were ever smoker, and 18 (64 %) had pulmonary emphysema. Sixteen (57 %) had comorbidities such as hypertension, heart disease, and/or diabetes. In 26 eligible patients, the overall response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median overall survival were 11.5, 53.8 %, 3.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.9-5.7] months and 9.5 (95 % CI 3.3-12.5) months, respectively. Median administered course number was 3 (range 1-14). Median duration of PS maintenance ≤2 was 4.9 (95 % CI 1.3-9.7) months. Common (≥10 %) grade 3/4 toxicities included 7 (27 %) neutropenia, 7 (27 %) leukopenia, 4 (15 %) fatigue, and 3 (12 %) thrombocytopenia. Febrile neutropenia and interstitial lung disease were not observed. There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: Pemetrexed monotherapy demonstrated moderate efficacy and good safety in chemo-naïve PS 2 patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown non-squamous NSCLC. It can be a therapeutic option in "frail" PS 2 non-squamous NSCLC patients without the indication of combination regimens, if the patient is EGFR wild-type.

Broglio and Berry (2009) examined the impact of survival postprogression (SPP) on overall survival (OS) when progression-free survival (PFS) was used to assess treatment effect in metastatic cancer. Their simulation studies found no statistical difference in OS because of dilution effect from SPP, although there was a statistical difference in PFS between treatment arms. Recently, two phase III clinical trials showed efficacy of experimental treatments in OS, but not PFS. These results seem counterintuitive, because it may be reasonable to consider that the effect of treatment in prolonging PFS can influence OS prolongation. We conducted simulations to examine the role of SPP in OS under the assumption that only SPP, and not PFS, differed between treatment arms. We also explored the impact of patient heterogeneity on the OS analysis. Our study offers a reasonable explanation for the two phase III trials and recommends further discussion of PFS as an adequate endpoint and what role SPP might play in OS to evaluate current treatment regimens., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

To investigate the factors that affect molecular responses on dasatinib treatment in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP), we performed a clinical trial named the "D-First study." Fifty-two patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were enrolled in this study and received 100 mg dasatinib once daily. A deep molecular response (DMR) was defined as <50 copies/μg RNA of BCR-ABL1 transcript value corrected by GAPDH, which ensures <0.01% of BCR-ABL1 transcript value according to International Scale (BCR-ABL1(IS)). The halving time for BCR-ABL1 transcripts was calculated using transcript levels before dasatinib treatment, transcript levels after 3 months of treatment, and the treatment time between these two points. In terms of molecular response, 38 of 51 (75%) patients reached major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months, and the rate of DMR by 18 months was 59% (30/51). While both BCR-ABL1 transcript levels before treatment and a shorter halving time of BCR-ABL1 transcripts (≤14 days) were significant factors affecting achievement of MMR by 12 months, the Sokal score at diagnosis was not associated with MMR. Importantly, the halving time was the only factor that predicted achievement of DMR by 18 months. We showed that patients with CML-CP treated with dasatinib can be stratified according to the early treatment response as determined by the halving time of BCR-ABL1 transcripts. These data emphasize the significance of the early response from dasatinib treatment in achieving a DMR. (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01464411)., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using cisplatin as an alternative to sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who had not responded to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)., Methods: Medical records of 127 consecutive HCC patients without extrahepatic metastasis (cisplatin, n = 44; sorafenib, n = 83) who had not responded to prior TACE at four institutions were retrospectively reviewed. An inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scoring was used to adjust for the selection bias., Results: Severe adverse events accounting for treatment discontinuation occurred in 2.3% of the patients in the cisplatin group and 32.5% of those in the sorafenib group. The median overall survival (OS) period was 11.2 months (95% CI 4.8-17.7) in the cisplatin group and 10.2 months (95% CI 8.8-11.5) in the sorafenib group, respectively. After an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the survival outcome of the HAIC treatment group was not inferior to that of the sorafenib treatment group (hazard ratio 0.758; 95% CI 0.471-1.219, P = 0.253)., Conclusion: HAIC with cisplatin can be an alternative treatment for the selection of HCC patients who have not responded to prior TACE and cannot tolerate sorafenib., (© 2014 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

The benefits and challenges of incorporating biomarkers into the development of anticancer agents have been increasingly discussed. In many cases, a sensitive subpopulation of patients is determined based on preclinical data and/or by retrospectively analyzing clinical trial data. Prospective exploration of sensitive subpopulations of patients may enable us to efficiently develop definitively effective treatments, resulting in accelerated drug development and a reduction in development costs. We consider the development of a new molecular-targeted treatment in cancer patients. Given preliminary but promising efficacy data observed in a phase I study, it may be worth designing a phase II clinical trial that aims to identify a sensitive subpopulation. In order to achieve this goal, we propose a Bayesian randomized phase II clinical trial design incorporating a biomarker that is measured on a graded scale. We compare two Bayesian methods, one based on subgroup analysis and the other on a regression model, to analyze a time-to-event endpoint such as progression-free survival (PFS) time. The two methods basically estimate Bayesian posterior probabilities of PFS hazard ratios in biomarker subgroups. Extensive simulation studies evaluate these methods' operating characteristics, including the correct identification probabilities of the desired subpopulation under a wide range of clinical scenarios. We also examine the impact of subgroup population proportions on the methods' operating characteristics. Although both methods' performance depends on the distribution of treatment effect and the population proportions across patient subgroups, the regression-based method shows more favorable operating characteristics., (Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Purpose: To elucidate whether adjuvant taxane monotherapy is a feasible and tolerable for postoperative breast cancer patients, we evaluated the severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the relative tolerability of regimens by health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with taxane-containing regimens., Methods: We evaluated CIPN and HRQOL in the first 300 patients enrolled in a larger (1,060 total) multicenter phase III trial randomized to one of four adjuvant regimens: (1) anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP), (2) AC followed by docetaxel (ACD), (3) paclitaxel alone (PTX), or (4) docetaxel alone (DTX). CIPN was assessed by the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, and HRQOL by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). CIPN and HRQOL scores were compared between ACP and ACD vs. PTX and DTX, and ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX., Results: PNQ sensory scores were significantly higher in patients treated with taxane monotherapy compared to treatment with AC followed by taxane (P = .003). No significant differences in PNQ sensory scores were observed between the ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX regimens (P = .669). Regardless of taxane regimen, PNQ severity scores for CIPN appear to be largely reversible within 1 year of adjuvant treatment. No significant difference in FACT-G scores was observed between any regimens during the study treatments., Conclusions: Patient-reported CIPN was significantly more severe with single-agent adjuvant taxane compared to AC followed by taxane treatment; however, the HRQOL findings support that single-agent taxane treatment is tolerable.

Background: For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, first-line gefitinib produced a longer progression-free survival interval than first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel but did not show any survival advantage in the North East Japan 002 study. This report describes the quality of life (QoL) analysis of that study., Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with sensitive EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive gefitinib or chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel). Patient QoL was assessed weekly using the Care Notebook, and the primary endpoint of the QoL analysis was time to deterioration from baseline on each of the physical, mental, and life well-being QoL scales. Kaplan-Meier probability curves and log-rank tests were employed to clarify differences., Results: QoL data from 148 patients (72 in the gefitinib arm and 76 in the carboplatin plus paclitaxel arm) were analyzed. Time to defined deterioration in physical and life well-being significantly favored gefitinib over chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] of time to deterioration, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.50; p < .0001 and HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65; p < .0001, respectively)., Conclusion: QoL was maintained much longer in patients treated with gefitinib than in patients treated with standard chemotherapy, indicating that gefitinib should be considered as the standard first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in spite of no survival advantage.

Background: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene respond well to the EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. However, whether gefitinib is better than standard platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients selected by EGFR mutation is uncertain., Methods: We did an open label, phase 3 study (WJTOG3405) with recruitment between March 31, 2006, and June 22, 2009, at 36 centres in Japan. 177 chemotherapy-naive patients aged 75 years or younger and diagnosed with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer or postoperative recurrence harbouring EGFR mutations (either the exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation) were randomly assigned, using a minimisation technique, to receive either gefitinib (250 mg/day orally; n=88) or cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), intravenously) plus docetaxel (60 mg/m(2), intravenously; n=89), administered every 21 days for three to six cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Survival analysis was done with the modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with UMIN (University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan), number 000000539., Findings: Five patients were excluded (two patients were found to have thyroid and colon cancer after randomisation, one patient had an exon 18 mutation, one patient had insufficient consent, and one patient showed acute allergic reaction to docetaxel). Thus, 172 patients (86 in each group) were included in the survival analyses. The gefitinib group had significantly longer progression-free survival compared with the cisplatin plus docetaxel goup, with a median progression-free survival time of 9.2 months (95% CI 8.0-13.9) versus 6.3 months (5.8-7.8; HR 0.489, 95% CI 0.336-0.710, log-rank p<0.0001). Myelosuppression, alopecia, and fatigue were more frequent in the cisplatin plus docetaxel group, but skin toxicity, liver dysfunction, and diarrhoea were more frequent in the gefitinib group. Two patients in the gefitinib group developed interstitial lung disease (incidence 2.3%), one of whom died., Interpretation: Patients with lung cancer who are selected by EGFR mutations have longer progression-free survival if they are treated with gefitinib than if they are treated with cisplatin plus docetaxel., Funding: West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG): a non-profit organisation supported by unrestricted donations from several pharmaceutical companies., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Goals: The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and validity of a newly developed patient-based instrument--the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ)--for grading chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)., Patients and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 300 female patients who were treated with taxane chemotherapy for primary breast cancer as part of a national multicenter phase III randomized trial (N-SAS BC 02). We evaluated patient compliance with the PNQ and several validation parameters, including concordance between CIPN grades noted by physicians (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) and patients (PNQ), and the concurrent validity and responsiveness of the PNQ versus the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) utilizing data at pre-treatment and before three, five, and seven treatment cycles., Main Results: The questionnaire completion rate was >90% at all assessments. Evaluation by physicians always resulted in lower neuropathy assessment scores compared with those reported directly by patients (weighted kappa coefficients, 0.02-0.06). Both PNQ sensory and motor scores were significantly correlated with the FACT/GOG-Ntx (r = 0.66 and 0.51, respectively). In the repeated measures analysis of variance model, PNQ grades increased considerably as treatment continued, indicating progressively worsening CIPN over time., Conclusions: The PNQ has an applicable degree of feasibility and validity, useful for the diagnosis of CIPN as well as for clinical treatment decision-making, where the development of CIPN is a potential treatment-limiting consideration. Physicians underreport and underestimate the severity of CIPN symptoms compared with patients, thereby supporting the importance of assessing patient-reported outcomes using the PNQ.

Objective: Since there is now growing interest in the incorporation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer clinical trials, a patient-based questionnaire, the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) was developed to quantify the symptoms and severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicians' perspectives regarding the utility and diagnostic value of PNQ., Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 61 physicians who participated in a Phase III randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (AC followed by taxane versus taxane alone) that used the PNQ to assess CIPN., Results: Forty-seven out of 61 physicians (77%) responded. The majority considered neurosensory symptoms the diagnostic hallmark for CIPN and most regarded interference with activities of daily living (ADLs) as definite justification for treatment modifications. For neurosensory disturbance, the majority of physicians indicated that Grade D severity (moderate to severe symptoms interfering with ADLs) should result in treatment postponement and Grade E severity (severe symptoms preventing most ADLs) should result in treatment discontinuation. Similarly, for neuromotor disturbance, over half of the physicians replied that Grade C (moderate symptoms not interfering with ADLs), D and E severity should result in dose reduction, treatment postponement and treatment discontinuation, respectively. Eighty-four percentage of the physicians reported that the use of the PNQ was helpful in the diagnosis and assessment of patients at risk of CIPN., Conclusions: The PNQ appears to be a useful instrument for the diagnosis and grading of CIPN, as well as for clinical decision-making regarding treatment modifications secondary to CIPN.

Background: Radiation or hormonal therapy is considered for prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, these therapies have their own complications. To delay the start of these therapies, we investigated the efficacy and safety of Brazilian green propolis for the treatment for BCR after RP. Materials and Methods: This single-center, single-arm open trial included 22 patients who experienced BCR after RP between 2016 and 2019. The patients received nine softgels of Brazilian green propolis (containing 40 mg propolis per capsule) daily for 6 months. The primary outcome was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. The secondary outcomes included progression-free time, PSA slope (1/PSA doubling time) response rate, quality of life, and safety profile. Results: The PSA response rate was 0%. The mean PSA slopes before and after baseline were 0.12 month−1 and 0.08 month−1, respectively. Fifteen patients (68%) showed a decreased PSA slope after treatment. There were no negative effects on quality of life or serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: There was no significant anticancer response in patients who received Brazilian green propolis. However, the PSA slope was decreased after propolis administration. Further, Brazilian green propolis may be safely consumed by patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12-15% of lung cancers and has a limited prognosis, with approximately one-third of SCLC patients having a poor performance status (PS). Patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC and a poor PS have a poor prognosis. For this population, overall survival from carboplatin and etoposide treatment is 7-8 months, and treatment development is an unmet medical need. Recently, the combination of an anti-PD-L1 (a ligand for programmed cell death 1) antibody and platinum-based chemotherapy has become the standard of care for ES-SCLC patients with a good PS (PS 0-1). We hypothesized that the combination of the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab with carboplatin and etoposide would be feasible and effective for such patients.Methods: We initiated a multicenter phase II study of durvalumab combined with carboplatin and etoposide in previously untreated ES-SCLC patients with a poor PS (PS 2-3). Eligible patients will receive durvalumab plus carboplatin and etoposide every 3 to 4 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dosages of carboplatin and etoposide for the second and subsequent cycles will be adaptively determined based on the adverse events of the first cycle. A total of 56 patients (43 patients with a PS of 2 and 13 patients with a PS of 3) will be enrolled in this study, with a 24-month enrollment period and a 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is the tolerability of carboplatin and etoposide plus durvalumab in previously untreated ES-SCLC patients with a poor PS. The secondary endpoints are the 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, ratio of PS improvement, and safety.Discussion: The results of this study are intended to establish the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and etoposide plus durvalumab in patients with ES-SCLC and a poor PS.Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT), jRCTs031200319. Registered 21 January 2021, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031200319. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eribulin methylate (eribulin) improved the overall survival (OS) of eribulin-treated patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) in prospective and retrospective studies. However, the effect of eribulin on OS as first-line chemotherapy and the characteristics of the patients who benefited from eribulin remain unclear.Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2016, 301 patients with HER2-negative ABC who started first-line chemotherapy at 3 institutions were retrospectively evaluated for OS from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy.Results: We identified 172 patients (119 estrogen receptor-positive [ER+], 47 ER-, 6 unknown) who received eribulin (eribulin group) and 129 patients (92 ER+, 31 ER-, 6 unknown) who did not receive eribulin (non-eribulin group). The median OS from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy in the two groups was not statistically significant (869 vs. 744 days, P = 0.47, log-rank); however, in patients who received eribulin in later lines (≥3rd-line) and who had a history of perioperative chemotherapy with anthracycline- and/or taxane-based regimens, the median OS improved (1001 vs. 744 days, P = 0.037; and 834 vs. 464 days, respectively P = 0.032, respectively; Wilcoxon). Multivariate analyses revealed that a history of perioperative chemotherapy with anthracycline- and/or taxane-based regimens was a predictive factor (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.70) for OS.Conclusions: This study successfully identified subgroups of HER2- ABC patients with improved OS by eribulin therapy. Selecting patients according to their background and line of treatment will maximize the efficacy of eribulin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were eligible. In the phase I dose-escalation cohort (3 + 3 design), patients received nab-paclitaxel (80 or 100 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (60 or 75 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks was selected for the phase II cohort. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).Results: Twenty-three patients (phase I, n = 6; phase II, n = 17) were enrolled, and 22 patients were eligible. The median age was 67.5 years (range 37-75), 90.9% were males, 45.5% had adenocarcinoma and 81.8% had stage IV disease. The ORR was 59.1% (90% confidence interval (CI); 41.8-74.4), and the disease control rate was 86.4% (95% CI; 66.7-95.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI; 4.0-6.7), and the median overall survival was 24.2 months (95% CI; 8.4 months to not estimable). The common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (31.8%), leukopenia (27.3%), lung infection (18.2%) and hyponatremia (18.2%). There was one instance of grade 2 interstitial pneumonia and no treatment-related death.Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin was well tolerated and associated with encouraging response outcomes in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation is warranted.Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000011776; Date of registration: 17 September 2013; Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 23 January 2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dasatinib has shown promising anti-leukemic activity against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, patients receiving dasatinib frequently require dose reductions and treatment interruptions (treatment alteration).Methods: We prospectively analyzed the frequency and significance of treatment alteration during dasatinib therapy in patients with CML. In all patients, trough plasma concentrations of dasatinib (Cmin) at steady state were assessed on day 28 of therapy.Results: 28% of patients had their doses reduced at a median of 42 days, and 25% of patients had temporarily interrupted at a median of 54 days after treatment initiation. The overall dasatinib treatment alteration-free rate at 1 year was 66%. Age was significantly correlated with Cmin on day 28 (p = 0.014), and the correlation remained significant after adjusting dasatinib dose (g), body weight (kg) (Cmin/D/W) (p = 0.026). In the univariate analysis, deep molecular response, advanced PS, higher Cmin/D/W were associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment alteration (HR 4.19, 95% CI: 1.06-16.60, p = 0.041; HR 5.26, 95% CI: 1.33-20.80, p = 0.018; and HR 10.15, 95% CI: 2.55-40.48, p = 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, advanced PS and higher Cmin/D/W were correlated with the incidence of treatment alteration (HR 4.78, 95% CI: 1.01-22.70, p = 0.049; HR 6.17, 95% CI: 1.17-32.50, respectively).Conclusion: Current data demonstrate that patients treated with dasatinib who displayed a high Cmin/D/W value and/or advanced PS were at a high risk for altered treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy (post-Cx) after first-line chemotherapy (1st-Cx) and after second-line chemotherapy (2nd-Cx), and survival benefit of third-line chemotherapy (3rd-Cx) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).Methods: Phase III trials of systemic chemotherapy for AGC published in English between 2005 and 2015 or presented at annual meetings of ASCO or ESMO between 2013 and 2015 were searched. Numbers of patients, types of chemotherapy, patient baseline, proportion of patients receiving post-Cx (post-Cx%), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) of each treatment arm were surveyed; trials not reporting these parameters were excluded. Median post-progression survival (mPPS) was calculated as the difference between mOS and mPFS. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients between post-Cx% and survival outcomes (mOS and mPPS) were calculated. The effect of post-Cx% on survival outcomes adjusted for the types of chemotherapy and patient characteristics was evaluated by meta-regression.Results: Overall, 25 phase III trials of AGC were selected: 15 trials with 31 arms for 1st-Cx, and 10 trials with 16 arms for 2nd-Cx. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients for post-Cx% and mOS/mPPS were 0.520/0.739 for 1st-Cx, and 0.767/0.823 for 2nd-Cx. Meta-regression analyses adjusting for types of chemotherapy, age, and PS showed that a 10% increase in post-Cx% was associated with prolongation of mOS by 1.033 months for 1st-Cx and 0.344 months for 2nd-Cx.Conclusions: Post-Cx% both after 1st-Cx and 2nd-Cx were correlated with mOS/mPPS, suggesting a survival benefit of 3rd-Cx in addition to that of 2nd-Cx for AGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]