Search

Background The efficacy to monotherapy with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in advanced cancer is often limited due to therapy resistance. Combining everolimus with metformin may decrease the chance of therapy resistance. Methods Patients received everolimus and metformin in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. Objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, toxic effects, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumour efficacy. Results 9 patients received study treatment for a median duration of 48 days (range: 4-78). 6 patients discontinued due to toxicity and 3 patients because of progressive disease. At the starting dose level of 10 mg everolimus qd and 500 mg metformin bid, 3 out of 5 patients experienced a DLT. After de-escalation to 5 mg everolimus qd and 500 mg metformin bid, considerable toxicity was still observed and patient enrollment was terminated. In pharmacokinetic analyses, metformin was eliminated slower when co-administered with everolimus than as single-agent. After 9 weeks of treatment, 3 patients were still on study and all had stable disease. Conclusion The combination of everolimus and metformin is poorly tolerated in patients with advanced cancer. The pharmacokinetic interaction between everolimus and metformin may have implications for diabetic cancer patients that are treated with these drugs. Our results advocate for future clinical trials with combinations of other mTOR inhibitors and biguanides.

Purpose: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has become the standard treatment strategy for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. This multicenter phase 2 study investigated the efficacy of the addition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor panitumumab to a preoperative CRT regimen with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and radiation therapy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer., Methods and Materials: Patients with resectable cT1N1M0 or cT2-3N0 to -2M0 tumors received preoperative CRT consisting of panitumumab (6 mg/kg) on days 1, 15, and 29, weekly administrations of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 2), and paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)) for 5 weeks and concurrent radiation therapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, 5 days per week), followed by surgery. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. We aimed at a pCR rate of more than 40%. Furthermore, we explored the predictive value of biomarkers (EGFR, HER 2, and P53) for pCR., Results: From January 2010 until December 2011, 90 patients were enrolled. Patients were diagnosed predominantly with adenocarcinoma (AC) (80%), T3 disease (89%), and were node positive (81%). Three patients were not resected due to progressive disease. The primary aim was unmet, with a pCR rate of 22%. Patients with AC and squamous cell carcinoma reached a pCR of 14% and 47%, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 95% of the patients. Main grade 3 toxicities were rash (12%), fatigue (11%), and nonfebrile neutropenia (11%). None of the biomarkers was predictive for response., Conclusions: The addition of panitumumab to CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated but could not improve pCR rate to the preset criterion of 40%., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The patient experienced bilateral blue toe syndrome which we related to sunitinib use. Discontinuation of sunitinib to lower the patient's prothrombotic state and increase the ability to form collaterals, together with the addition of low-molecular-weight heparin to treat the occluding thrombi, resulted in waning of the blue toe syndrome. This case adds to the accumulating evidence of possible untoward cardiovascular side effects that should be taken into consideration in patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib.

Background: The European Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (EU-ARCCS) expanded-access study provided sorafenib to advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in whom previous systemic therapy had failed. The study assessed the safety and use of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced RCC in a large community-based patient population across 11 countries in Europe., Patients and Methods: EU-ARCCS was a single-arm, open-label trial of sorafenib in advanced RCC patients. End points included safety, time to progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, prior therapy, and number and sites of metastases., Results: About 1159 advanced RCC patients were enrolled. Most patients (94%) experienced drug-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with the most common grade ≥3 AEs including hand-foot skin reaction (13%), diarrhea (7%), fatigue (7%), hypertension (6%), and rash/desquamation (5%). The incidence of AEs in the subgroups was similar to that in the overall population. Median PFS was 6.6 months; DCR at ≥8 and ≥12 weeks was 85% and 78%, respectively., Conclusions: The sorafenib safety profile in European community-based practice settings was similar to that reported in clinical trials. The heterogeneous advanced RCC patient population in EU-ARCCS permitted assessment of sorafenib in important subpopulations of advanced RCC patients.

Background: Angiogenesis inhibition is a rational treatment strategy for high-grade glioma (HGG). Combined antiangiogenic therapy and chemotherapy could be beneficial, taking advantage of different mechanisms of antitumour activity of both therapies. We carried out a phase I-II clinical trial with the combination of bevacizumab and continuous dose-intense temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with a recurrent HGG after first- or second-line treatment., Patients and Methods: Twenty-three HGG patients were treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks) and TMZ (daily 50 mg/m(2)), until clinical or radiological progression. Conventional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were carried out on days -4, 3 and 21 and until clinical or radiological progression., Results: Overall response rate (20%), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) (17.4%), median progression-free survival (13.9 weeks) and median overall survival (OS) (17.1 weeks) were considerably lower compared with most other studies with bevacizumab-containing regimens. The dynamic MRI parameters contrast transfer coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume decreased rapidly during the early phases of treatment, reflecting changes in vascularisation and vessel permeability but not in tumour activity. In addition, >50% of patients showed oedema reduction and a reduced shift on T1 images., Conclusion: Treatment with bevacizumab and TMZ is feasible and well tolerated but did not improve PFS6 and median OS.

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma is evolving rapidly due to the advent of novel targeted therapies. Improved knowledge of the underlying pathogenesis has led to the development of drugs that modulate the dominant signal transduction pathways for this disease, which results in inhibition of angiogenesis. Recent evidence indicates that the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib prolongs progression-free survival compared with interferon-alpha, especially in patients with intermediate risk. Immunotherapy with interferon-alpha or high-dose interleukin-2 should still be considered for low-risk patients, particularly those with clear-cell tumours and metastases of the lung only. In patients who fail treatment with interferon-alpha, sorafenib has been shown to improve progression-free survival. High-risk patients may benefit from treatment with temsirolimus, which inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase activity and has shown to improve overall survival. These angiogenesis inhibitors did not receive mention in the recently published guideline 'Renal cell carcinoma'.

Background: The high costs of new disease-modifying, but non-curative, treatments in advanced cancer are increasingly regarded as problematic. Little is known about oncologists' beliefs regarding their ethical obligations for cost considerations about these types of treatments., Participants and Methods: This study used in-depth interviews to explore how physicians in The Netherlands view their role regarding the cost of potentially beneficial but expensive drugs, especially for new disease-modifying treatments in advanced cancer. Thirty-six physicians, 19 physicians caring for patients with advanced cancer and 17 physicians participating in four national oncology guideline committees, were interviewed., Results: Physicians identified cost considerations on three levels: individual patient care, hospital policies and national guideline development. Generally, physicians were reluctant to consider costs in individual patient care, believing this compromised their ethical obligations. They did consider costs relevant at the level of hospital policies regarding coverage for drugs. They were divided regarding the role of cost considerations in national practice guideline development., Conclusions: The distinctive levels of decision-making were understood to be morally relevant as physicians separated their role as direct care provider from that of taking part in decisions about coverage. Because of the fundamental tension between the physician obligation to act in the best interest of the individual patient, the vulnerability of having a life-threatening illness and the inevitability of sharing resources in modern health care, cost considerations will always be problematic for physicians. The roles physicians play at different levels, especially at the levels of hospital policies and national practice guidelines, should further be developed and explicated.

Background: Retrospective analyses of clinical trials and prospective clinical studies have suggested that heparins may have an effect on cancer survival. This putative anti-cancer activity of heparins is supported by data from studies in animal tumour models., Objective: To clarify the various potential mechanisms of heparin anti-cancer activity we evaluated the data from pre-clinical studies in which heparins have been tested as anti-cancer therapy., Methods: Pre-clinical studies, published between 1960 and 2005 were assessed. Data were collected on the type and dose of heparin used, duration of exposure to heparin, interval between heparin administration and cancer cell inoculation, and the animal tumour model used. In addition, a distinction was made in the analysis between heparin effects on the primary tumour or on established metastases and effects on the metastatic potential of infused cells., Results: Heparins seemed to affect the formation of metastasis rather than the growth of primary tumours. Chemically modified heparins with no or limited anticoagulant activity also showed anti-metastatic properties. Possible mechanisms to explain the effects on the process of metastases include inhibition of blood coagulation, inhibition of cancer cell-platelet and -endothelial interactions by selectin inhibition and inhibition of cell invasion and angiogenesis., Conclusion: The anti-cancer activity of heparins depends more on inhibition of metastasis formation than on the effects on primary tumour growth. These effects are probably related to both coagulation and non-coagulation dependent factors. For a definitive proof of the anti-cancer activity of heparins in the clinic, prospective randomized trials especially in patients with early metastatic disease or in the adjuvant setting are urgently needed.

An evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal carcinoma was developed on the initiative of the Netherlands Society of Gastroenterohepatology in cooperation with the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO) and the Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. If a patient with oesophageal carcinoma is eligible for treatment with curative intent, they should undergo thoracic and abdominal CT, ultrasound investigation of the supraclavicular region and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging purposes. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred treatment for high-grade dysplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus confined to the mucosa. Surgical resection is indicated if the tumour invades the submucosa. If resection of the oesophageal carcinoma is performed with curative intent, one should aim for radical resection. The type and extent of the resection depends on the location of the tumour. There is evidence that the mortality rate following surgery can be reduced by performing it in centres with ample experience with oesophageal cancer surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy may improve survival in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Palliative treatment for oesophageal carcinoma should be considered in cases of local invasion of surrounding organs, metastases, poor physical condition of the patient or recurrent disease after previous curative treatment. Psychosocial support is an important element in the follow-up of patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Purpose: The efficacy of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib was assessed in a phase II study in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Several biologic features were investigated as potential markers of gefitinib activity., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer, who had failed one line of prior chemotherapy, were administered gefitinib 500 mg/d. Response was evaluated every 8 weeks. Tumor material obtained before gefitinib treatment was investigated for gene mutations in EGFR, k-ras, and PIK3CA; protein expression levels of EGFR, p-Akt, and p-Erk; and EGFR gene amplification., Results: Of the 36 enrolled patients, one (2.8%) achieved a partial response, 10 (27.8%) had stable disease, 17 (47.2%) experienced progression on treatment, and eight (22.2%) were not assessable for response. The progression-free survival time was 59 days, and the median overall survival time was 164 days. Although EGFR or PIK3CA mutations were absent, k-ras mutations were found in two patients with progressive disease. High EGFR gene copy number was identified in two patients experiencing partial response or progressive disease. A higher disease control rate (response plus stable disease) was observed in females (P = .038) and in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; P = .013) or high EGFR expression (P = .002)., Conclusion: Gefitinib has a modest activity in second-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. However, the patient outcome was significantly better in female patients and in patients demonstrating high EGFR expression or SCC histology. The selection of esophageal cancer patients for future studies with EGFR-TKIs based on the level of EGFR expression in their tumors or SCC histology should be considered.

Purpose: Determine whether standard or high-dose chemotherapy leads to changes in fatigue, hemoglobin (Hb), mental health, muscle and joint pain, and menopausal status from pre- to post-treatment and to evaluate whether fatigue is associated with these factors in disease-free breast cancer patients., Patients and Methods: Eight hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned between two chemotherapy regimens both followed by radiotherapy and tamoxifen. Fatigue was assessed using vitality scale (score < or = 46 defined as fatigue), poor mental health using mental health scale (score < or = 56 defined as poor mental health) both of Short-Form 36, muscle and joint pain with Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and Hb levels were assessed before and 1, 2, and 3 years after chemotherapy., Results: Fatigue was reported in 20% of 430 assessable patients (202 standard-dose, 228 high-dose) with at least a 3-year follow-up, without change over time or difference between treatment arms. Mean Hb levels were lower following high-dose chemotherapy. Only 5% of patients experienced fatigue and anemia. Mental health score was the strongest fatigue predictor at all assessment moments. Menopausal status had no effect on fatigue. Linear mixed effect models showed that the higher the Hb level (P = .0006) and mental health score (P < .0001), the less fatigue was experienced. Joint (P < .0001) and muscle pain (P = .0283) were associated with more fatigue., Conclusion: In 3 years after treatment, no significant differences in fatigue were found between standard and high-dose chemotherapy. Fatigue did not change over time. The strongest fatigue predictor was poor mental health.

Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors - HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) have been approved for the treatment of lipid disorders. Recently, in vivo studies with experimental animals and in vitro studies indicated a possible role for statins in the treatment of malignancies. Inhibition of the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase results in decreased farnesylation and geranylgeranylation of several proteins essential for cellular proliferation and survival. Inhibition of Ras farnesylation was originally thought to be the mechanism that mediates statin-induced effects in cancer. Consequently, specific inhibitors of the enzyme farnesyltransferase (FTIs) were developed. Currently, the mechanisms that mediate statin- and FTI-induced antitumour effects are questioned. It remains unclear which proteins and signal transduction cascades are involved. This review focuses on the effects and possible therapeutic application of statins and FTIs. Antitumour properties such as induction of growth arrest and apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis and inhibition of angiogenesis are discussed. Furthermore, the mechanisms of statin- and farnesyltransferase inhibitor-induced effects and the involvement of a number of cellular components (such as farnesylated and geranylgeranylated proteins, the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway, the phosphoinositide 3'-kinase signalling pathway, and cell cycle regulatory proteins) are reviewed. In addition, clinical and epidemiological data with respect to statins and farnesyltransferase inhibitors are summarised. We propose that inhibitors of the mevalonate pathway are particularly effective when administered in combination with other drugs. Therefore, the mechanisms and effects of combined therapy of statins or farnesyltransferase inhibitors with chemotherapeutics, biphosphonates, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, specific inhibitors of geranylgeranyltransferase and inhibitors of tyrosine kinase activity are discussed.

Cardiotoxicity is a well-known side effect of several cytotoxic drugs, especially of the anthracyclines and can lead to long term morbidity. The mechanism of anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity seems to involve the formation of free radicals leading to oxidative stress. This may cause apoptosis of cardiac cells or immunologic reactions. However, alternative mechanisms may play a role in anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity. Cardiac protection can be achieved by limitation of the cumulative dose. Furthermore, addition of the antioxidant and iron chelator dexrazoxane to anthracycline therapy has shown to be effective in lowering the incidence of anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity. Other cytotoxic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and the taxoids are associated with cardiotoxicity as well, although little is known about the possible mechanisms. Recently, it appeared that some novel cytotoxic drugs such as trastuzumab and cyclopentenyl cytosine also show cardiotoxic side effects.

Background: Various studies suggest that aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are promising anticancer agents. Epidemiological studies have found that long-term use of NSAIDs is associated with a reduced incidence of colorectal, gastric and oesophageal cancers, while experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that treatment with NSAIDs causes a statistically significant reduction in both the number and the size of polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients., Methods: In this review, the mechanisms by which NSAIDs exert their chemopreventive and antineoplastic effects are described., Results: Although the precise anticancer actions of NSAIDs are not fully explained, they probably involve inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX), which is the rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. Two isoforms of this enzyme (COX-1 and COX-2) have been identified. COX-1 is constitutively expressed and considered to be a housekeeping gene, while COX-2 is not usually detectable in normal tissues, but can be readily induced in processes like inflammation, reproduction and carcinogenesis. The mechanisms by which COX-2 is thought to be involved in the carcinogenesis include resisting apoptosis, increasing cell proliferation, stimulating angiogenesis and modulating the invasive properties of cancer cells., Conclusion: This report reviews the mechanisms by which COX-2 can contribute to carcinogenesis, its role in prognosis, and the possible place of selective COX-2 inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, focusing particularly on oesophageal cancer.

Purpose: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles., Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups., Conclusion: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Background: Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation is rapidly replacing autologous bone marrow transplantation as hematological support after high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma or solid tumors. Controversy exists concerning the number of progenitor cells required for rapid and sustained bone marrow recovery, and as to which of the widely available methods for estimating this number should be employed., Methods: Forty consecutive patients with solid tumors or lymphomas received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral stem cell reinfusion. All stem cell harvests had been performed after mobilization with standard-dose chemotherapy followed by 300 micrograms G-CSF daily. Hematopoietic reconstitution was studied in relation to pertinent patient characteristics, to the size of the graft (in terms of the total number of mononuclear cells (MNC), the number of granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and the number of CD34+ cells, and to the use of G-CSF after stem cell reinfusion., Results: Both the numbers of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells reinfused, but not those of the MNC, correlated with granulocyte and platelet recovery. Patients who received at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight achieved platelet transfusion independence on day 12 after reinfusion (range: day 7-37), significantly earlier than patients who had received less (p = 0.001). Thirty patients who received G-CSF (300 micrograms s.c. daily) after reinfusion achieved granulocyte recovery (> or = 500 x 10(6)/l) on day 9 (range: day 8-12), while this took a median of 15 days (range: day 10-28) in 10 consecutive patients not receiving G-CSF (p = 0.0003). In one patient who had received 1.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, secondary bone marrow failure developed 3 months after transplantation. Reinfusion of cryopreserved autologous bone marrow was followed by prompt recovery., Conclusion: Peripheral stem cells, mobilized by moderate-dose chemotherapy and G-CSF, lead to rapid and durable engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy when at least 3-5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg are reinfused. Lower numbers may also be satisfactory, but are associated with slower granulocyte and platelet recoveries. A moderate dose of G-CSF after reinfusion significantly hastens granulocyte recovery without interfering with platelet recovery.

In the present study we demonstrate that Aza-dC in combination with Amsacrine has major antileukaemic properties in patients who have not already received extensive Ara-C therapy. Eight out of 11 patients in their first relapse of acute leukaemia achieved complete remission. Cross resistance between Ara-C and Aza-dC was revealed by the lack of antileukaemic activity in five patients with with Ara-C resistant leukaemia. Combination therapy with Aza-dC/Ams-acrine induced a considerable period of a granulocytopenia (28-35 days), while the toxic effect on erythro- and megakaryopoiesis was comparable to that reported for high dose Ara-C/Amsacrine chemotherapy. Remarkable is the long disappearance time for leukaemic blast cells in bone marrow, i.e. 3-5 weeks in some cases. Analysis of cell membrane markers showed a loss of the early differentiation antigens CD34 and CD33 from leukaemic bone marrow cells after 7 days of Aza-dC treatment, which is suggestive of leukaemic cell differentiation. In the small group of patients tested for DNA hypomethylation no association existed between the degree of hypomethylation and clinical response. Non-haematologic side effects were considerable in patients receiving the highest dosages of Aza-dC and consisted of severe, although usually reversible, gastrointestinal and neurological complications. In comparison with Ara-C, Aza-dC causes less nausea and vomiting and is therefore better tolerated.

Using a Brown Norway rat leukaemia model (BNML), which is a realistic model of human myelocytic leukaemia, we compared the antileukaemic activity, influence on cell cycle kinetics and effect on normal haematopoiesis of 5 aza-2-deoxycytidine (aza-dC) and arabinofuranosyl-cytosine (ara-C). The antileukaemic activity was evaluated by means of a survival study. For aza-dC a dose-response relationship was demonstrated for doses up to 50 mg kg-1 (3 times q 12 h); a higher dose resulted in only a slight increase in median survival time (MST). For ara-C a weak dose-response relationship was observed. At the maximum dose of aza-dC and ara-C tested, aza-dC induced a 10-day longer survival time than ara-C, which means 2 logs more of leukaemic cell kill for aza-dC. By means of flow cytometric analysis and a 3HTdR uptake study it was shown that aza-dC does not influence the cell cycle kinetics in the first 24 h after exposure, in contrast to ara-C which caused the characteristic G1/S blockage and synchronization. The influence of aza-dC and ara-C on normal haematopoiesis was evaluated with the CFU-S assay. The dose-response curve for CFU-S did not show a significant difference in stem cell cytotoxicity between aza-dC and ara-C. In the BNML model aza-dC is a much more effective antileukaemic agent than ara-C, while the toxic effect on normal haematopoiesis is comparable to that of ara-C.