Search

Complete response (CR) was an uncommon event in elderly myeloma patients until novel agents were combined with standard oral melphalan-prednisone. This analysis assesses the impact of treatment response on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed 1175 newly diagnosed myeloma patients, enrolled in 3 multicenter trials, treated with melphalan-prednisone alone (n = 332), melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (n = 332), melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (n = 257), or melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib-thalidomide (n = 254). After a median follow-up of 29 months, the 3-year PFS and OS were 67% and 27% (hazard ratio = 0.16; P < .001), and 91% and 70% (hazard ratio = 0.15; P < .001) in patients who obtained CR and in those who achieved very good partial response, respectively. Similar results were observed in patients older than 75 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the achievement of CR was an independent predictor of longer PFS and OS, regardless of age, International Staging System stage, and treatment. These findings highlight a significant association between the achievement of CR and long-term outcome, and support the use of novel agents to achieve maximal response in elderly patients, including those more than 75 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00232934, #ISRCTN 90692740, and #NCT01063179.

In older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the prevention of relapse has remained one of the major therapeutic challenges, with more than 75% relapses after complete remission. The anti-CD33 immunotoxin conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) has shown antileukemic remission induction activity in patients with relapsed AML. Patients with AML or refractory anemia with excess blasts in first complete remission attained after intensive induction chemotherapy were randomized between 3 cycles of GO (6 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks) or no postremission therapy (control) to assess whether GO would improve outcome. The 2 treatment groups (113 patients receiving GO vs 119 control patients) were comparable with regard to age (60-78 years, median 67 years), performance status, and cytogenetics. A total of 110 of 113 received at least 1 cycle of GO, and 65 of 113 patients completed the 3 cycles. Premature discontinuation was mainly attributable to incomplete hematologic recovery or intercurrent relapse. Median time to recovery of platelets 50 x 10(9)/L and neutrophils 0.5 x 10(9)/L after GO was 14 days and 20 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild overall, but there was 1 toxic death caused by liver failure. There were no significant differences between both treatment groups with regard to relapse probabilities, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, or disease-free survival (17% vs 16% at 5 years). Postremission treatment with GO in older AML patients does not provide benefits regarding any clinical end points. The HOVON-43 study is registered at The Netherlands Trial Registry (number NTR212) and at http://www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN77039377.

Objective: Polypharmacy is frequent among older cancer patients and increases the risk of potential drug‐related problems (DRPs). DRPs are associated with adverse drug events, drug‐drug interactions and hospitalisations. Since no standardised polypharmacy assessment methods for oncology patients exist, we aimed to develop one that can be integrated into routine care. Methods: Based on the Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP), we developed OncoSTRIP, which includes a polypharmacy anamnesis, a concise geriatric assessment, a polypharmacy analysis taking life expectancy into account and an optimised treatment plan. Patients ≥65 years with ≥5 chronic drugs visiting our outpatient oncology clinic were eligible for the polypharmacy assessment. Results: OncoSTRIP was integrated into routine care of our older cancer patients. In 47 of 60 patients (78%), potential DRPs (n = 101) were found. In total, 85 optimisations were recommended, with an acceptance rate of 41%. It was possible to reduce the number of potential DRPs by 41% and the number of patients with at least one potential DRP by 30%. Mean time spent per patient was 71 min. Conclusions: Polypharmacy assessment of older cancer patients identifies many pharmacotherapeutic optimisations. With OncoSTRIP, polypharmacy assessments can be integrated into routine care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]