Search

Background: Breast cancer (BC) has the highest global prevalence among all malignancies in women and the second highest prevalence in the overall population. Paclitaxel (PTX), a tricyclic diterpenoid, is effective against BC. However, its poor solubility in water and the allergenicity of its dissolution medium limited its clinical application., Methods: In this work, we established a multifunctional graphene oxide (GO) tumor-targeting drug delivery system using nanosized graphene oxide (nGO) modified with D-tocopherol polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) for PTX loading., Results: The obtained RGD-TPGS-nGO-PTX was 310.20±19.86 nm in size; the polydispersity index (PDI) and zeta potential were 0.21±0.020 and -23.42 mV, respectively. The mean drug loading capacity of RGD-TPGS-nGO-PTX was 48.78%. RGD-TPGS-nGO-PTX showed satisfactory biocompatibility and biosafety and had no significant toxic effects on zebrafish embryos. Importantly, it exerted excellent cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231 cells, reversed multi-drug resistance (MDR) in MCF-7/ADR cells, and showed significant anti-tumor efficacy in tumor-bearing nude mice., Conclusion: These findings strongly suggested that the multifunctional GO tumor-targeting drug delivery system RGD-TPGS-nGO-PTX could be used in clinical settings to improve PTX delivery, reverse MDR and increase the therapeutic efficacy of BC treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article., (© 2022 Mo et al.)

Background: There are no clinically available prognostic models for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer treated with everolimus. We aimed to develop a tool to predict the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients and to identify optimal candidates who would benefit from everolimus-based treatment in this heterogeneous patient population., Methods: The clinical data of patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving everolimus between May 2012 and January 2018 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively retrieved. Based on potential prognostic factors derived from multivariate Cox analysis, we established predictive nomogram models for PFS and OS and evaluated their predictive values by means of the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were used to estimate the consistency between the actual observations and the nomogram-predicted probabilities., Results: A total of 116 patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in this study. Three independent prognostic factors, including the line of everolimus in the metastatic setting, everolimus clinical benefit rate and number of liver metastatic lesions, were identified from the multivariate Cox analysis. Prognostic models for individual survival prediction were established and graphically presented as nomograms. The C-index was 0.738 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.710-0.767) for the PFS nomogram and 0.752 (95% CI: 0.717-0.788) for the OS nomogram, which showed favourable discrimination. The calibration curves for the probabilities of 6-, 9-, and 12-month PFS and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS suggested satisfactory consistency between the actual observations and the predicted probabilities., Conclusion: We constructed convenient nomogram models for patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer to individually predict their potential benefits from everolimus in the metastatic setting. The models showed good performance in terms of accuracy, discrimination capacity and clinical application value., Competing Interests: All authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare., (© 2021 Duan et al.)

Background: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a dose-limiting adverse effect. Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) functions as a neuroprotective factor. We assessed the effects of GM1 on the prevention of TIPN in breast cancer patients., Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 206 patients with early-stage breast cancer planning to receive taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy with a follow-up of more than 1 year. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive GM1 (80 mg, day -1 to day 2) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment Neurotoxicity subscale score after four cycles of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included neurotoxicity evaluated by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group neuropathy scale. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: In 183 evaluable patients, the GM1 group reported better mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment Neurotoxicity subscale scores than patients in the placebo group after four cycles of chemotherapy (43.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.05 to 43.49 vs 34.34, 95% CI = 33.78 to 34.89; mean difference = 8.96, 95% CI = 8.38 to 9.54, P < .001). Grade 1 or higher peripheral neurotoxicity in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 scale was statistically significantly lower in the GM1 group (14.3% vs 100.0%, P < .001). Additionally, the GM1 group had a statistically significantly lower incidence of grade 1 or higher neurotoxicity assessed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group neuropathy scale sensory neuropathy (26.4% vs 97.8%, P < .001) and motor neuropathy subscales (20.9% vs 81.5%, P < .001)., Conclusions: The treatment with GM1 resulted in a reduction in the severity and incidence of TIPN after four cycles of taxane-containing chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Patients suffering from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have poor prognosis mainly because no standard treatment is currently available. Our objectives were to explore the prognostic factors for first relapse of patients with TNBC. A cohort of 687 patients with TNBC, diagnosed and treated between January 1995 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, were retrospectively analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to explore factors that predict relapse development. Survival rate was computed using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The median age of the 687 patients was 46 (range 16-76 years), and 64.8% of the patients were pre-menopausal. The median follow-up time was 56 months (range 14-156 months), in which 194 patients had recurrence, and 115 died. The median recurrence-free time was 25 months (range 4-143 months), with 118 (60.8%) of the cases first relapsing at a single site. The three- and five-year disease-free survival rates were 79.7 and 72.6%, respectively. Primary tumor size at diagnosis, lymph node status, and type of regimen used in the (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were considered independent predictors of first relapse. CMF-containing adjuvant chemotherapy significantly decreased recurrence compared with the anthracycline- or taxane-based regimens (RR = 0.66, 95%; CI 0.45-0.96; P = 0.030). The median time from first relapse to death was 26 months (range 2-121 months). The two- and five-year survival rates were 60.6 and 36.6%, respectively. Liver metastasis at first recurrence and progression-free survival over 12 months after first-line therapy were two important factors that affected survival rate after recurrence. The median relapse time of TNBC was about 2 years after diagnosis. CMF regimens for TNBC patients may be more effective than anthracycline- or taxane-based regimens. Liver metastasis at first recurrence signifies unfavorable prognosis.

Background: Despite significant survival improvement in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade for HER2-positive breast cancer, resistance to anti-HER2 remains inevitable. Subsequent anti-HER2 with continuing trastuzumab beyond progression is acceptable with limited efficacy when other anti-HER2 treatment is unavailable. This single-arm, phase II study (SYSUCC-005) aimed to explore the efficacy of switching mode for HER2-positive refractory metastatic breast cancer.Methods: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer rapidly progressing during pre-trastuzumab from six hospitals in China were designed to switch to lapatinib 1,250 mg orally once per day continuously plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1-14) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8) of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Results: Between January 5, 2015 and May 31, 2020, 159 patients were eligible in this study. The median follow-up was 33.1 months, a median PFS of 8.5 months was achieved. Brain metastases (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.582, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.019- 2.453, P = 0.041) and ≥ 2 metastatic sites (HR = 1.679, 95% CI 1.151-2.450, P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were diarrhea (3.8%) and hand-foot syndrome (9.4%).Conclusion: The switching mode showed predominant efficacy, which might be a prior therapeutic option over continuing mode in subsequent anti-HER2 therapy for patients with HER2-positive refractory metastatic breast cancer.Trial Registration: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02362958 ) on 13/02/2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lessons Learned: Fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy showed a clinical benefit rate of 76% and median progression‐free survival of 16.1 months in patients who achieved objective responses or disease control after first‐line chemotherapy.Adverse events with fulvestrant maintenance therapy were consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. Background: Evidence for maintenance hormonal therapy after chemotherapy for estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy in patients after first‐line chemotherapy. Methods: We enrolled postmenopausal women with ER‐positive/HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer who attained tumor responses or disease control with four to eight cycles of chemotherapy as first‐line treatment. Fulvestrant 500 mg was injected on days 1, 15, and 29 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR); the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: We included 58 patients; the median follow‐up duration was 32.6 months. The CBR since commencing fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%–86%), and ORR was 14% (95% CI, 6%–25%); eight patients achieved partial response. The median PFS for fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 16.1 months (95% CI, 10.3–21.0 months). Thirty‐nine patients (67%) reported at least one adverse event, of which most were grade 1/2, whereas three patients (5%) reported grade 3 adverse events. Conclusion: Fulvestrant 500 mg is a feasible and promising hormonal maintenance strategy in patients with ER‐positive/HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer who have no disease progression after first‐line chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lessons Learned: Studies targeting the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway in aromatase inhibitor (AI)‐resistant breast cancer are limited.Bicalutamide, one of the commonly used AR inhibitors in prostate cancer, in combination with AI, did not show synergistic activity in patients with estrogen receptor‐positive and AI‐resistant disease in this phase II, single‐arm study.The clinical benefit rate and objective response rate at 6 months were 16.7% and 0%, respectively, and the study was terminated after the first stage. Background: Endocrine resistance is a major problem in clinical practice. Studies have shown that androgen receptor (AR) signaling activation may be one of the mechanisms, and targeting AR showed some promising results in AR‐positive triple‐negative breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide plus another aromatase inhibitor in patients with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) or steroidal AI resistance and estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive and AR‐positive advanced breast cancer. Methods: A Simon's two‐stage, phase II, single‐arm study was conducted. We assumed the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 40% would be significant in clinical practice. In this case, if ≥4 patients of the 19 patients in the first stage benefited from treatment, the CBR would achieve the assumed endpoint. If fewer than four patients benefited from treatment in the first stage, the trial would be terminated. All patients received bicalutamide 50 mg per day orally plus another aromatase inhibitor. The primary outcome was CBR; secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and tolerability. Results: A total of 19 patients enrolled in the first stage, and 18 patients met all criteria for analysis. The trial terminated according to protocol after the first stage. After a median follow‐up of 14 months, the CBR at 6 months was 16.7% (3/18); no patients with partial or complete response were observed. The median PFS was 2.7 months. Bicalutamide in combination with AI was well tolerated. Conclusion: Bicalutamide in combination with another AI did not show synergistic activity in patients with ER‐positive breast cancer and AI resistance. Results suggest that no more large‐sample clinical trials should be conducted in this population for overcoming endocrine resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Utidelone, a genetically engineered epothilone analogue, has shown promise as a potential treatment for breast cancer in phase 1 and 2 trials. The aim of this phase 3 trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of utidelone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Methods: We did a multicentre, open-label, superiority, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in 26 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were female patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy regimens. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) using computer based randomisation and block sizes of 6 to a 21-day cycle of either utidelone (30 mg/m2 intravenously once per day on days 1-5) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1-14), or capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1-14), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patients, physicians, and assessors were not masked to treatment allocation; however, an independent radiology review committee used to additionally assess response was masked to allocation. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed (by an independent radiology review committee) progression-free survival, and analysed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02253459.Findings: Between Aug 8, 2014, and Dec 14, 2015, we enrolled and randomly assigned 270 patients to treatment with utidelone plus capecitabine, and 135 to capecitabine alone. Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 6·77 months (IQR 3·81-10·32) for the utidelone plus capecitabine group and 4·55 months (2·55-9·39) for the capecitabine alone group. Median progression-free survival by central review in the utidelone plus capecitabine group was 8·44 months (95% CI 7·95-9·92) compared with 4·27 months (3·22-5·68) in the capecitabine alone group; hazard ratio 0·46, 95% CI 0·36-0·59; p<0·0001. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common grade 3 adverse event in the utidelone plus capecitabine group (58 [22%] of 267 patients vs 1 [<1%] of 130 patients in the capecitabine alone group). Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia was the most prominent grade 3 adverse event in the capacitabine alone group (in 10 [8%] of 130 patients) and was the next most frequent grade 3 event in the utidelone plus capecitabine group (in 18 [7%] of 267 patients). 16 serious adverse events were reported in the combination therapy group (diarrhoea was the most common, in three [1%] patients) and 14 serious adverse events were reported in the monotherapy group (the most common were diarrhoea, increased blood bilirubin, and anaemia, in two [2%] patients for each event). 155 patients died (99 in the combination therapy arm, 56 in the monotherapy arm). All deaths were related to disease progression except for one in each group (attributed to pericardial effusion in the combination therapy group and dyspnoea in the monotherapy group) that were considered possibly or probably treatment-related.Interpretation: Despite disease progression with previous chemotherapies, utidelone plus capecitabine was more efficacious compared with capecitabine alone for the outcome of progression-free survival, with mild toxicity except for peripheral sensory neuropathy, which was manageable. The findings from this study support the use of utidelone plus capecitabine as an effective option for patients with metastatic breast cancer.Funding: Beijing Biostar Technologies, Beijing, China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]