Search

Background: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies., Methods: ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards., Results: Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions., Conclusion: The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG) and 'ESMO Open-Cancer Horizons' roundtable discussion brought together stakeholders from several European Union (EU) countries involved in drug development, drug authorisation and reimbursement or otherwise affected by delayed and unequal access to innovative anticancer drugs. The approval process of drugs is well established and access delays can be caused directly or indirectly by national or regional decision-making processes on reimbursement. The two key aspects for those involved in reimbursement decisions are first the level of evidence required to decide and second pricing, which can be challenging for some innovative oncology compounds, especially in Eastern and South-Eastern European countries. Other important factors include: available healthcare budget; the structure and sophistication of healthcare authorities and health technology assessment processes; societal context and political will. From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, better alignment between stakeholders in the process and adaptive pathway initiatives is desirable. Key aspects for patients are improved access to clinical trials, preapproval availability and reports on real-world evidence. Restricted access limits oncologists' daily work in Eastern and South-Eastern EU countries. The roundtable discussion suggested considering the sequencing of regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions together with more flexible contracting as a possible way forward. The panel concluded that early and regular dialogue between all stakeholders including regulators, payers, patient stakeholders and industry is required to improve the situation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The current work of AB (for MoCA and as unpaid expert for the Austrian Federal Administrative Court) informs about payers’ attitudes/concerns regarding the reimbursement of expensive medicines. However, the opinions expressed here cannot be construed as an official position of any payer organisation. LKS received relevant financial funding for activities outside the submitted work, which are speaker’s fees from Roche, Novartis, BMS and MSD. GK received relevant financial funding outside the submitted work from MSD. AL: the views expressed in this article are the personal views of the the co-author and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of the European Medicines Agency or one of its committees or working parties. LM is a paid employee of Fight Bladder Cancer UK, and a volunteer board member of the World Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition. Fight Bladder Cancer UK has received financial support from BMS, Janssen, MSD and F. Hoffman-La Roche AG. The World Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition has received financial support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, F. Hoffman-La Roche AG, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD and Photocure. AR is an employee of MSD International and owns shares of MSD. MSD has supported this meeting together with Boehringer Ingelheim. NW received project grants and consulting and speaking fees from a large number of pharmaceutical companies, including MSD. CZ received honoraria from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Imugene, Ariad, Pfizer, Merrimack/Shire, Merck KGaA, Fibrogen, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Gilead, Servier, Eli Lilly and Amgen., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Purpose: To better understand the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit score version 2 (ASCO-NHB v2), ESMO and ASCO collaborated to evaluate the concordance between the frameworks when used to assess clinical benefit attributable to new therapies., Methods: The 102 randomized controlled trials in the noncurative setting already evaluated in the field testing of ESMO-MCBS v1.1 were scored using ASCO-NHB v2 by its developers. Measures of agreement between the frameworks were calculated and receiver operating characteristic curves used to define thresholds for the ASCO-NHB v2 corresponding to ESMO-MCBS v1.1 categories. Studies with discordant scoring were identified and evaluated to understand the reasons for discordance., Results: The correlation of the 102 pairs of scores for studies in the noncurative setting is estimated to be 0.68 (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; overall survival, 0.71; progression-free survival, 0.67). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified thresholds for ASCO-NHB v2 for facilitating comparisons with ESMO-MCBS v1.1 categories. After applying pragmatic threshold scores of 40 or less (ASCO-NHB v2) and 2 or less (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for low benefit and 45 or greater (ASCO-NHB v2) and 4 to 5 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for substantial benefit, 37 discordant studies were identified. Major factors that contributed to discordance were different approaches to evaluation of relative and absolute gain for overall survival and progression-free survival, crediting tail of the curve gains, and assessing toxicity., Conclusion: The agreement between the frameworks was higher than observed in other studies that sought to compare them. The factors that contributed to discordant scores suggest potential approaches to improve convergence between the scales.

The oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib had beneficial effects in randomized clinical phase III trials compared to the placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed on standard therapies. The factors which influence regorafenib response and therapy sequence during treatment history are still highly discussed, and herein we analyzed the therapy algorithm, outcome and clinical markers following regorafenib application in a single center register study. Clinical data for 48 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were collected from 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2016. Treatment effects according to various patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. The 48 patients comprised 14 (29%) females and 34 (71%) males, with mean age 64.2±9 and ECOG 0-1. Progression free survival under regorafenib therapy was 2.9 months (quartiles 2.2; 4.4) and the overall response rate was 2 (4%) and disease control rate was 19 (40%). Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were investigated under regorafenib in the chemotherapy regimen given immediately before and afterthis treatment. Variables including tumor localization, Ras status, CEA and CA 19-9 plasma levels were analyzed for their impact on PFS, and the regorafenib-related adverse events were also observed. Our study confirms the efficacy of regorafenib in a real-life setting. We established that response rate and PFS in regorafenib treatment are independent of tumor localization, Ras status or biomarkers such as CEA and CA 19-9. Trifluridin/tripacil application or re-induction of chemotherapy +/- target therapy was effective following regorafenib therapy.

Background: Vinorelbine constitutes effective chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and acts synergistically with trastuzumab in HER-2/neu positive disease. The present study was set out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine when combined with lapatinib, an anti-HER2 tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, as late-line regimen administered beyond previous disease progression on prior lapatinib in patients with HER-2/neu- positive MBC., Methods: The CECOG LaVie study was designed as open-labeled, single-arm, multicenter phase II trial. Patients had to be pretreated with lapatinib plus chemotherapy, and received lapatinib at a daily dose of 1250 mg in combination with vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a three-week cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as primary study endpoint; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate according to RECIST 1.1, and safety. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual., Results: A total number of nine patients were included; lapatinib administered beyond disease progression combined with vinorelbine resulted in a median PFS of 7.7 months (95% CI 0.56-14.91) and a median OS of 23.4 months (95% CI 16.61-30.13), respectively. Partial remission was seen in one of nine patients, three patients had stable disease of > six months, whereas the remaining five patients had primary disease progression. In two patients, modification of vinorelbine dose due to toxicity became necessary; no dose modification was needed for lapatinib. The majority of reported adverse events (AE) were grade 1 and 2 in severity with diarrhea being the most commonly observed AE CONCLUSION: In this heavily pretreated patient population, combination of vinorelbine plus lapatinib showed encouraging activity and was characterized by an acceptable safety profile. Despite the low patient number, lapatinib plus vinorelbine may constitute a potential treatment option in heavily pretreated patients with HER-2/neu-positive MBC previously exposed to lapatinib., Trial Registration: EudraCT number 2009-016826-15, (15. 10.2009).

Unlabelled: ESSENTIALS: Hemostasis biomarkers impact thrombosis occurrence and survival in cancer patients. We performed a longitudinal analysis of hemostatic parameters in 112 cancer patients. Hemostatic parameters are associated with disease state, patients' prognosis, and the risk of VTE. The procoagulant state exists not only at diagnosis, but also during the course of disease., Background: Hemostasis biomarkers are known to have an impact on venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence and survival in cancer patients., Objectives: As there are almost no data on longitudinal changes, we aimed to evaluate those in the present prospective observational study during chemotherapy and the course of disease., Patients/methods: Patients with cancer of the brain (n = 39), lung (n = 41), colon (n = 15) or pancreas (n = 17) were included before initiation of antitumor therapy. Blood samples for determination of factor VIII, thrombin peak height, D-dimer, F1 + 2 , fibrinogen and soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) were drawn on a monthly basis. The study endpoints were death, VTE occurrence, or completion of the study period., Results: Overall, 546 blood samples of 112 patients were analyzed. D-dimer and sP-selectin levels were significantly higher in patients with distant metastasis than in those without. Patients with complete remission had significantly lower levels of F1 + 2 , D-dimer and fibrinogen. Peak height thrombin levels showed a decrease over time in all tumor types. Levels of biomarkers behaved differently in the various tumor types. Patients who developed VTE (n = 14) showed increasing levels of FVIII, sP-selectin, and D-dimer. At the last blood sampling time-point before VTE occurrence, in 13 patients the D-dimer level was above the median, and in seven of these patients it was even above the 75th percentile; however, the individual course was highly variable. Regarding survival, steadily increased FVIII, sP-selectin and D-dimer levels were associated with higher mortality., Conclusions: Hemostatic parameters show an association with disease state, prognosis, and the risk of VTE, not only at diagnosis, but also during the course of antineoplastic treatment., (© 2015 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Treatments of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-particularly of the squamous subtype-are limited. In this article, we describe the immunomodulatory environment in NSCLC and the potential for therapeutic targeting of the immune system through cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint pathway blockade., Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed and presented abstracts for publications describing the clinical benefit of checkpoint blockade in NSCLC., Results: Antibody-mediated checkpoint molecule blockade is being investigated in NSCLC, and of these approaches, the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab has undergone the most extensive clinical study. By targeting the immune system rather than specific antigens, checkpoint blockade agents differ from vaccine therapy. In a phase II study in advanced NSCLC, phased ipilimumab with chemotherapy demonstrated the greatest efficacy in squamous NSCLC. A phase I study of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has suggested that this agent is also active against squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. Ongoing phase III studies are evaluating the therapeutic potential of these agents., Conclusions: Although treatment options for NSCLC are limited, a better understanding of the immune profile of this disease has facilitated the development of immunotherapeutics that target checkpoint blockade molecules, and clinical evaluation to date supports combining checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for squamous NSCLC.

Background: Trastuzumab-based therapy after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) may improve survival due to prolonged systemic disease control. We investigated whether lapatinib may yield additional survival benefit., Methods: Eighty patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of at least 70 was required. We included a control group of 37 patients treated before 2003, when continuation of trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was not yet recommended. Remainders received either trastuzumab or lapatinib and trastuzumab (either concomitantly or sequentially) with or without chemotherapy., Results: Median overall survival (OS) in patients receiving trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was 13 months; corresponding numbers were 9 months in patients treated with chemotherapy, and 3 months with radiotherapy alone. Median OS was not reached in the lapatinib group. Addition of lapatinib prolonged OS over trastuzumab alone (P=0.002). After correction for potential confounders, lapatinib therapy remained an independent positive predictor for survival (HR 0.279; P=0.012)., Interpretation: This retrospective single-centre study suggests that the introduction of lapatinib improved survival in patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with KPS ≥70 may benefit when treated with lapatinib in addition to trastuzumab after completion of local therapy.

Background: First line treatment with temsirolimus is considered standard of care in poor risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The role of temsirolimus in pretreated patients with any risk profile is unclear. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the impact of temsirolimus in patients who had progressed on various treatment lines., Material and Methods: From April 2007 to July 2009, all patients who had progressed on receptor-tyrosine kinase-inhibitors, VEGF-antibodies and other agents were treated with temsirolimus (25 mg weekly). Physical examination, white blood cell count and chemistry were obtained weekly and tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks., Results: Thirty patients with a median age of 68 years range (44-81) received treatment with temsirolimus. Most patients were categorized intermediate risk (60%) and the majority had three or more metastatic sites (56.7%). Temsirolimus was median the fourth (range 2-5) systemic treatment line. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare and consisted of anemia, thrombocytopenia and hyperglycemia. Objective remission and stable disease were achieved in 13.3% and 60% of the patients, respectively. The median progression free survival was 4.9 months (2.93-6.81 95% CI)., Conclusion: Temsirolimus appears feasible, safe and active in heavily pretreated patients.

Bortezomib-dexamethasone (Btz/Dex) is an active regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and has been used in few patients with amyloidosis. Here, we report a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of Btz/Dex in 26 patients with AL amyloidosis (AL). Eighteen patients (69%) received Btz/Dex as first-line treatment. Organs most frequently involved were kidneys (100%) and heart (35%); five patients (19%) had less than two organs involved. The overall response rate was 54% (14 of 26 patients), with eight patients (31%) achieving a hematologic complete remission (CR). All patients who reached a CR received Btz/Dex as first-line therapy. Median time to response was 7.5 weeks. Improvement in organ function was noticed in three patients (12%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 5.0 and 18.7 months, respectively; in CR patients, however, median PFS and OS have not yet been reached. Toxicities were manageable, with hematological side effects being most common. No grade 3/4 neuropathy was observed. Our results confirm the activity of bortezomib/dexamethasone in patients with AL amyloidosis and suggest that patients achieving a CR have a marked benefit for survival.

Biological features of tumor cells relevant to progression, metastasis, and prognosis in cancer patients have been investigated for many years. During the past few years, the concept of tumor stem cells has gained widespread acceptance. The cancer stem cell (CSC) model is based on the observation that continuous growth of tumors depends on a small population of immature neoplastic cells with unlimited proliferative potential. In contrast to these CSC, more mature clonal cells in the same neoplasm undergo apoptosis and die after a variable number of cell divisions. The self-renewal capacity of CSC plays a central role in this scenario and enables permanent tumor cell repopulation in vivo in patients as well as in experimental animals, e.g., immunodeficient mice. Based on the stem cell concept, it is clear that the success of an anti-neoplastic approach depends on efficient targeting and elimination of CSC. An important aspect of CSC is their intrinsic resistance against conventional drugs. Therefore, a major focus in current research is molecular targets and their expression in CSC, with the goal to use targeted drugs for CSC elimination. It is the hope for the future that therapeutic approaches involving CSC-targeting concepts will lead to sustained remission and thus improvement of prognosis in leukemia and cancer patients.

Background: Patients with metastatic central nervous system (mCNS) disease progression from breast cancer have a poor prognosis and often develop associated neurological complications. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positivity status increases the risk of developing mCNS disease. Trastuzumab is an mAb that targets HER2 and is known to extend survival across all stages of HER2-positive breast cancer., Design: This review considers evidence from preclinical and clinical studies examining the value of continuing trastuzumab treatment in patients who develop mCNS disease. A wealth of data from clinical studies showed that trastuzumab prolonged survival in patients with mCNS disease, compared with no trastuzumab treatment, by effectively controlling their non-CNS disease. Trastuzumab has also been shown to penetrate an impaired blood-brain barrier to a limited degree, such as during radiotherapy, and intrathecal delivery of trastuzumab to the central nervous system (CNS) has shown promise. Research efforts are focussing on improving the delivery of trastuzumab to the CNS., Conclusion: Evidence indicates that patients with mCNS disease from HER2-positive breast cancer should continue to receive trastuzumab to control HER2-positive metastases outside the CNS and receive established therapies to control the mCNS disease.

Background: Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures., Design: To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC., Results: Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated., Conclusions: The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.

Background: Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease., Methods: This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804., Findings: All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001)., Interpretation: Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer., Funding: Eli Lilly.

Heat shock protein 32 (Hsp32), also known as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), is a stress-related anti-apoptotic molecule, that has been implicated in enhanced survival of neoplastic cells and in drug-resistance. We here show that Hsp32 is expressed in most solid tumors and hematopoietic neoplasms and may be employed as a new therapeutic target as evidenced by experiments using specific siRNA and a Hsp32-targeting pharmacologic inhibitor. This Hsp-32 targeting drug, SMA-ZnPP, was found to inhibit the proliferation of neoplastic cells with IC(50) values ranging between 1 and 50 microM. In addition, SMA-ZnPP induced apoptosis in all neoplastic cells examined. Furthermore, SMA-ZnPP was found to synergize with other targeted and conventional drugs in producing growth-inhibition. Resulting synergistic effects were observed in all tumor and leukemia cells examined. Interestingly, several of the drug partners, when applied as single agents, induced the expression of Hsp32 in neoplastic cells, suggesting that synergistic effects resulted from SMA-ZnPP-induced ablation of a Hsp32-mediated survival-pathway that is otherwise used by tumor cells to escape drug-induced apoptosis. Together, Hsp32 is an important survival factor and target in solid tumors and hematopoietic neoplasms, and may be used to optimize anticancer therapy by combining conventional or targeted drugs with Hsp32-inhibitors. Based on these data, it seems desirable to explore the value of Hsp32-targeting drugs as anti-cancer agents in clinical trials.

Melanoma is highly resistant to chemotherapy. In melanoma, the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is constitutively activated through multiple mechanisms. Several experimental studies suggest that targeting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is a promising strategy to overcome chemoresistance. This is the first report describing a chemosensitizing effect of mTOR inhibition in patients with melanoma. We report two cases of patients with metastatic melanoma who showed significant remission after combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus. Our case report, together with the literature discussed, suggests that mTOR inhibition possibly enhances the sensitivity of melanoma cells to chemotherapy and should prompt in-depth and clinical investigation.

The serum cytokine levels (in particular interleukine-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)) of 61 advanced stage cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy as outpatients were determined with quantikine immunoassays. The values were correlated with body mass index (BMI), weight loss and appetite. Furthermore cytokine levels of patients who have died within one year were compared with those of patients who have survived more than a year. Serum levels of IL-6 (median: 1.93 pg/ml, range: 0.32-42.87) and of TNF-alpha (median: 2.55 pg/ml, range: 1.03-34.06) did not correlate with BMI, weight loss and appetite. Serum IL-6 levels of patients with survival time less than one year were significantly higher than the levels of patients who survived more than one year, no significant differences in TNF-alpha serum levels were evident. The data of this observation are consistent with current literature. Due to changes in serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in response to chemotherapy and additional therapy, it is unlikely that IL-6 and TNF-alpha can be used as independent indicators for weight loss and appetite. Nevertheless, high serum levels of IL-6 correlate with short-time mortality.

Purpose: In previous phase I to III studies docetaxel and vinorelbine have shown promising activity in androgen independent prostate cancer. In the present trial we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of single agent low dose docetaxel vs vinorelbine in patients with advanced androgen independent prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: A total of 40 chemotherapy naive patients with histologically proven androgen independent prostate cancer, adequate androgen ablation, and clinical and/or biochemical progression were randomly assigned to receive either 25 mg/m(2) docetaxel (arm A) or 25 mg/m(2) vinorelbine (arm B) weekly. Treatment was continued until clinical and/or biochemical progression. In cases of progression patients switched to the alternative treatment arm. The primary end point was time to disease progression. Secondary end points included prostate specific antigen response rates in sequential treatment, analgesic response and toxicity., Results: The current analysis showed a doubled risk of progression in treatment arm B. The median time to first disease progression was 14.5 months for arm A vs 4.4 months for arm B. The proportion of patients with a greater than 50% prostate specific antigen decrease on first line therapy was significantly higher in arm A (62.5%) compared to arm B (11.1%) (p = 0.0033). After progression to docetaxel second line vinorelbine yielded a greater than 50% prostate specific antigen response rate of 28.6% vs 62.5% for second line docetaxel. Clinically significant toxicity occurred more often in arm B with neutropenia grade 4 seen in 22% and grade 3 in 28% of patients (p = 0.0005) during the first treatment phase., Conclusions: While weekly application of both cytotoxic agents was well tolerated, this study demonstrates the superiority of docetaxel vs vinorelbine as monotherapy in the treatment of androgen independent prostate cancer.

Studies of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) suggested that bortezomib may be active even in the presence of adverse prognostic factors. We therefore evaluated 62 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who were treated with single-agent bortezomib, and addressed the question whether or not the negative prognostic impact of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities may be overcome by bortezomib. By interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a deletion of chromosome 13q14 [del(13q14)] was present in 33 patients (53%). Overall response rates to bortezomib were similar in patients with and without del(13q14) (45 versus 55%; P=0.66), and rates of complete remission (CR) near CR were also not different between the two patient populations (18 versus 14%). Three patients had a t(4;14)(p16;q32) in addition to del(13q14), and all of them had a >50% paraprotein reduction. Median duration of response was 12.3 months in patients with del(13q14) compared with 9.3 months in patients with normal 13q-status (P=0.25), and survival was also not different between the two patient populations. Patients not benefiting from single-agent bortezomib were characterized by the combined presence of a del(13q14) and low serum albumin (median survival 4.6 months). Our results provide evidence for remarkable activity of bortezomib in MM with del(13q14). Patients who do not respond to bortezomib and consecutively have short time to treatment failure and overall survival can be identified by low serum albumin in addition to del(13q14) and should be considered for bortezomib combinations.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is not only a major risk factor for infection-related morbidity and mortality, but is also a significant dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment. Patients developing severe (grade 3/4) or febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy frequently receive dose reductions and/or delays to their chemotherapy. This may impact on the success of treatment, particularly when treatment intent is either curative or to prolong survival. The incidence of severe or FN can be reduced by prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), such as filgrastim, lenograstim or pegfilgrastim. However, the use of G-CSF prophylactic treatment varies widely in clinical practice, both in the timing of therapy and in the patients to whom it is offered. While several academic groups have produced evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in an effort to standardise and optimise the management of FN, there remains a need for generally applicable, European-focused guidelines. To this end, we undertook a systematic literature review and formulated recommendations for the use of G-CSF in adult cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced FN. We recommend that patient-related adverse risk factors such as elderly age (>or=65 years), be evaluated in the overall assessment of FN risk prior to administering each cycle of chemotherapy. In addition, when using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in >20% patients, prophylactic G-CSF is recommended. When using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in 10-20% patients, particular attention should be given to patient-related risk factors that may increase the overall risk of FN. In situations where dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy strategies have survival benefits, prophylactic G-CSF support is recommended. Similarly, if reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity or density are known to be associated with a poor prognosis, primary G-CSF prophylaxis may be used to maintain chemotherapy. Finally, studies have shown that filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim have clinical efficacy and we recommend the use of any of these agents to prevent FN and FN-related complications, where indicated.

Purpose: The primary objective of this randomized phase III study was to show significant difference in median time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent gemcitabine maintenance therapy versus best supportive care following gemcitabine plus cisplatin initial first-line therapy., Patients and Methods: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days. Patients achieving objective response or disease stabilization following initial gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy were randomized (2:1 fashion) to receive maintenance gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) plus best supportive care (GEM arm), or best supportive care only (BSC arm)., Results: Between November 1999 and November 2002, we enrolled 352 patients (median age: 57 years; stage IV disease: 74%; Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >80: 41%). Following initial therapy, 206 patients were randomized and treated with gemcitabine (138) or best supportive care (68). TTP throughout the study period was 6.6 and 5 months for GEM and BSC arms, respectively, while values for the maintenance period were 3.6 and 2.0 months (for p < 0.001 for both). Median overall survival (OS) throughout study was 13.0 months for GEM and 11.0 months for BSC arms (p = 0.195). The toxicity profile was mild, with neutropenia being most common grade 3/4 toxicities., Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with gemcitabine, following initial therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, was feasible, and produced significantly longer TTP compared to best supportive care alone. Further studies are warranted to establish the place of maintenance chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Lymphoepitheloid cell lymphoma (Lennert's lymphoma) is a rare malignant disease usually affecting patients at advanced age. Although classified as a "low-grade" lymphoma in the past, the clinical course is highly unfavorable and currently available chemotherapeutic regimens have given disappointing results. We present the case of a 74-year-old male suffering from disseminated Lennert's lymphoma. The patient underwent standard treatment approaches including chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP); fludarabin and cyclophosphamide; and ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE). Due to progressive disease with all these regimens, chemotherapy was discontinued. As cells stained highly positive for CD52, immunotherapy with alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) was started using a standard dosing regime of 30 mg every third day. Although the patient received prophylactic anti-infective medication, leucocytopenia with reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was observed and the administration of alemtuzumab had to be stopped temporarily. Re-assessment of disease 5 weeks after the start of alemtuzumab disclosed a significant reduction of all thoracic and abdominal lesions, and therapy with alemtuzumab was continued after normalization of the number of CMV copies and is currently ongoing. Our observations indicate clinical activity of alemtuzumab in the treatment of Lennert's lymphoma, including even bulky nodal disease, particularly for patients who have failed conventional therapies.

We evaluated a treatment strategy targeting both lymphoma cells (by rituximab) and the microenvironment (by thalidomide) in 16 patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m(2) for 4 weekly doses concomitantly with thalidomide (200 mg daily, with a dose increment to 400 mg on day 15), which was continued as maintenance therapy until progression/relapse. Thirteen patients (81%) experienced an objective response, with 5 complete responders (31%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-23.6 months), and estimated 3-year survival was 75%. In patients achieving a complete response, PFS after rituximab plus thalidomide was longer than PFS after the preceding chemotherapy. Severe adverse events included 2 thromboembolic events and 1 grade IV neutropenia associated with thalidomide. Our results suggest that rituximab plus thalidomide has marked antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory MCL and a low toxicity profile, which warrants further evaluation in MCL.

Proteolytic cleavage of the Her-2/neu extracellular domain (ECD) has been shown to initiate receptor phosphorylation representing Her-2/neu activation in vitro. The present investigation was performed to evaluate the clinical relevance of ECD cleavage for Her-2/neu activation and the consequences of active intracellular Her-2/neu signalling reflected by tyrosine kinase phosphorylation in patients treated with the anti-Her-2/neu antibody trastuzumab. Sera from 62 patients receiving trastuzumab-based treatment for Her-2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer were assessed for pretreatment ECD levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In parallel, Her-2/neu activation status of tumour specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry using a Her-2/neu phosphorylation state specific antibody (PN2A) and correlated with the patients' ECD levels and clinical course of disease. Serum ECD levels were significantly higher in 15 (24%) patients with tumours exhibiting activated Her-2/neu as compared to those without detectable Her-2/neu phosphorylation (median 148.2 vs 28.5 ng ml(-1), P=0.010). Whereas response rate only showed a trend to be higher in patients with Her-2/neu-phosphorylated breast cancer (47 vs 34%, P=0.197), both uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that the median progression-free survival under trastuzumab-based treatment was significantly longer in patients with Her-2/neu-phosphorylated breast cancer-11.7 (95% CI 5.2-18.3) months-when compared to the progression-free survival of 4.5 (95% CI 3.4-5.6) months observed in patients with tumours lacking phosphorylated Her-2/neu (P=0.001). Proteolytic cleavage of the ECD represents a biologically relevant ligand-independent mechanism of Her-2/neu activation in vivo. The influence of Her-2/neu activation status upon the outcome of trastuzumab-based therapies merits further investigation in larger prospective trials.

Chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis represents a therapeutic challenge frequently encountered in cancer patients. This side effect causes significant morbidity and may delay the treatment plan, as well as increase therapeutic expenses. The pathogenesis of this debilitating side effect can be attributed to the direct mucosal toxicity of cytotoxic agents and ionizing radiation and to indirect mucosal damage caused by a concomitant inflammatory reaction exacerbated in the presence of neutropenia, and the emergence of bacterial, mycotic, and viral infections. The prophylactic and therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of oral mucositis consists of locally and systemically applied nonpharmacological measures and pharmacotherapeutics.

Purpose: During the past 30 years, radiation therapy with 28 to 30 Gy for para-aortic and ipsilateral iliac node areas was the standard adjuvant treatment for clinical stage I seminoma after orchiectomy. However, late effects of radiotherapy prompted a search for alternative adjuvant treatment approaches, including surveillance and application of carboplatin. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of two adjuvant single-agent carboplatin courses in 107 patients who were diagnosed with clinical stage I seminoma at our study centers between 1988 and 1999., Patients and Methods: All 107 patients (median age, 39 years; range, 24 to 63 years) received two postoperative adjuvant cycles of carboplatin (400 mg/m(2)). The pathologic tumor stage was pT1 in 84 patients, pT2 in 18 patients, and pT3 in five patients. Whole blood count and serum chemistry were evaluated weekly during treatment to assess hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity., Results: Six patients died from tumor-unrelated causes. The remaining 101 patients are currently alive and free of disease after a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 5 to 145 months). A detailed analysis of hematologic toxicity showed only World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 leukocytopenia in 10.7% of all cycles and WHO grade 2 leukocytopenia in 2.1% of all cycles., Conclusion: Regarding the absence of tumor recurrences in our retrospective analysis and the favorable toxicity profile with no episodes of long-term toxicity, we suggest that two adjuvant courses of single-agent carboplatin for clinical stage I seminoma patients might be equivalent to radiotherapy.

Only in a small proportion of patients is advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resectable, so the need for effective non-surgical treatments is obvious. We present details of a 72-year-old woman with inoperable HCC and chronic infection with hepatitis C virus, proved by the presence of antibodies directed against hepatitis C virus and positive polymerase chain reaction. The patient was treated with subcutaneous recombinant human interferon-alpha-2b. Within a few weeks, a partial tumour remission, paralleled by a decrease in serum levels of tumour markers and liver enzymes, was observed. In addition, polymerase chain reaction became negative. This observation facilitates the hypothesis that the anti-viral effects of interferon might have been jointly responsible for the anti-tumour activity observed. Interferon-alpha might serve as a treatment option in patients with unresectable hepatoma and chronic active viral hepatitis, but prospective studies are warranted.

Background and Objectives: Surgery is the main treatment for extra-abdominal desmoid tumors, but the results of further management remain uncertain. Therefore, a retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) +/- tretinoin in this setting., Methods: Thirteen patients with extra-abdominal desmoid tumors and a median age of 32 years (range, 15-73) received IFN-alpha. Seven of these patients received a combination of IFN-alpha and tretinoin in order to test further enhancement., Results: After a mean observation period of 27 +/- 15 months (mean +/- standard deviation) under treatment with IFN-alpha +/- tretinoin, local control was seen in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Seven patients had no evidence of disease at a mean disease-free interval of 22 +/- 18 months; in two patients progressive disease occurred after only 7 and 9 months, respectively, of observation. In another four patients, progression of the desmoid tumor was stabilized., Conclusions: The data of this retrospective, nonrandomized study on therapy with IFN-alpha +/- tretinoin suggest that such treatment may be effective in prolonging the disease-free interval of patients after intralesional or marginal surgery. Because of the encouraging response rate, this regimen appears to be another nonsurgical treatment alternative., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objectives: During the past 25 years, radiotherapy has been considered the standard adjuvant treatment for clinical Stage I seminoma after orchiectomy. However, the late effects of this treatment have prompted a re-examination of the alternatives, including surveillance and adjuvant administration of carboplatin. To our knowledge, the present clinical study is the first to report the effects of two adjuvant courses of single-agent carboplatin on the pituitary-testicular axis and on sperm analysis., Methods: Twenty-two patients with clinical Stage I seminoma participated in a prospective investigation of gonadal function before and after carboplatin therapy. After orchiectomy but before chemotherapy, blood samples for determination of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) serum levels were obtained from all 22 patients. Seventeen patients provided a semen sample at the same time, but 5 were unable to do so. At the end of chemotherapy, all 22 patients provided repeated semen samples starting 1 year after the termination of treatment and continuing at intervals of 12 months. FSH serum levels were determined at the same time. The study period was 48 months., Results: Before chemotherapy, 2 patients (12%) had azoospermia, 9 (53%) had oligospermia, and 6 (35%) had normospermia. During the study period, sperm counts continued to increase in all patients. After 4 years, 7 patients (32%) had oligospermia and 15 (68%) normospermia. The mean prechemotherapy FSH level (15.5 IU/L) was increased in accordance with subnormal spermatogenesis, but a constant trend toward normalization was observed thereafter., Conclusions: Our results show recovery of spermatogenesis after adjuvant single-agent carboplatin for clinical Stage I seminoma in a remarkably high percentage of patients.

The endocrine action of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) has been claimed to be of a glucocorticoid-like nature. Upon clinical observation, MPA has been shown to improve life quality and overall well-being in patients with advanced breast cancer, renal carcinoma, prostatic carcinoma, and uterine adenocarcinoma. The authors have evaluated MPA endocrine action by the administration of human corticotropin releasing factor (hCRF) in a 90-minute assay in 15 patients with advanced breast cancer or renal cell carcinoma both, before the initiation of oral high-dose MPA treatment (1000 mg MPA) as well as after at least 10 days of therapy. The curves for corticotropin, beta-endorphin, and cortisol responses to hCRF of tumor patients who were tested before the initiation of MPA treatment were parallel to the curves of a healthy control group of probands tested under equal conditions, although at significantly higher respective hormone levels. In patients with malignant disorders assayed after MPA administration, both basal and peak hormone levels were found to be comparable with values obtained in healthy controls. In conclusion, MPA appeared to act at a suprapituitary level since pituitary responsiveness to hCRF was preserved under MPA treatment. Moreover, it appeared that MPA brought the hormonal stress state found in patients with malignant tumors back to normal.

Adrenal carcinomas constitute very rare diseases. In the case of adrenocortical carcinoma, cytostatic drugs can be used for palliation of symptoms, whereas no clearly effective cytostatic preparations have been found for the treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma. Radiotherapy can be used in both instances for the palliation of symptoms.

Unstimulated IFN- and IL2-stimulated (NK) cell activities were investigated in patients with breast cancer who had received either local radiotherapy alone or adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment with CMF combined with radiotherapy 12 to 18 months previously. When tested against the primarily NK-sensitive K562 cell line, patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment with CMF were shown to have a significantly decreased unstimulated and IFN-stimulated NK cell activity, as compared to both patients after radiotherapy only (P less than 0.002) and P less than 0.005, respectively) and healthy control persons (P less than 0.05). The former group of patients also had a significantly decreased IFN-stimulated NK cell activity, when tested against the primarily NK-insensitive Chang hepatoma cell line, as compared to patients after radiotherapy only (P less than 0.005) and healthy controls (P less than 0.05). Moreover, patients after radiotherapy only proved to have a significantly increased unstimulated (P less than 0.01) and IFN-stimulated NK cell activity (K562: P less than 0.05; Chang hepatoma cell line: P less than 0.05), as compared to healthy control individuals. In contrast, no difference in IL2-stimulated NK cell activity was detected. The investigation for the expression of CD3 and/or Leu 19 antigens as phenotypic markers of cells with non-MHC restricted cytotoxicity showed a significantly lower percentage of cells with the CD3+ phenotype in patients with breast cancer, irrespective of the chosen post-operative treatment, as compared to healthy controls (P less than 0.01). Finally, patients with breast cancer who had received radiotherapy only had a significant trend towards an increased percentage of CD3+/Leu 19+ PMNC, as compared to both patients after CMF treatment (P less than 0.05) and healthy controls (P less than 0.025). We conclude that patients with breast cancer vary on a long-term basis in their NK activity and in the phenotype of their PMNC depending on their post-operative adjuvant management.

Background:The randomised phase III TURANDOT trial compared first-line bevacizumab-paclitaxel (BEV-PAC) vs bevacizumab-capecitabine (BEV-CAP) in HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). The interim analysis revealed no difference in overall survival (OS; primary end point) between treatment arms; however, progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate were significantly superior with BEV-PAC. We sought to identify patient populations that may be most appropriately treated with one or other regimen.Methods:Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomised to either BEV-PAC (bevacizumab 10 mg kg−1 days 1 and 15 plus paclitaxel 90 mg m−2 days 1, 8 and 15 q4w) or BEV-CAP (bevacizumab 15 mg kg−1 day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg m−2 bid days 1-14 q3w). The study population was categorised into three cohorts: triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and low-risk HR+. High- and low-risk HR+ were defined, respectively, as having ⩾2 vs ⩽1 of the following four risk factors: disease-free interval ⩽24 months; visceral metastases; prior (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane; and metastases in ⩾3 organs.Results:The treatment effect on OS differed between cohorts. Non-significant OS trends favoured BEV-PAC in the TNBC cohort and BEV-CAP in the low-risk HR+ cohort. In all three cohorts, there was a non-significant PFS trend favouring BEV-PAC. Grade ⩾3 adverse events were consistently less common with BEV-CAP.Conclusions:A simple risk factor index may help in selecting bevacizumab-containing regimens, balancing outcome, safety profile and patient preference. Final OS results are expected in 2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00600340). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The value of any new therapeutic strategy or treatment is determined by the magnitude of its clinical benefit balanced against its cost. Evidence for clinical benefit from new treatment options is derived from clinical research, in particular phase III randomised trials, which generate unbiased data regarding the efficacy, benefit and safety of new therapeutic approaches. To date, there is no standard tool for grading the magnitude of clinical benefit of cancer therapies, which may range from trivial (median progression-free survival advantage of only a few weeks) to substantial (improved longterm survival). Indeed, in the absence of a standardised approach for grading the magnitude of clinical benefit, conclusions and recommendations derived from studies are often hotly disputed and very modest incremental advances have often been presented, discussed and promoted as major advances or 'breakthroughs'. Recognising the importance of presenting clear and unbiased statements regarding the magnitude of the clinical benefit from new therapeutic approaches derived from high-quality clinical trials, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a validated and reproducible tool to assess the magnitude of clinical benefit for cancer medicines, the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). This tool uses a rational, structured and consistent approach to derive a relative ranking of the magnitude of clinically meaningful benefit that can be expected from a new anti-cancer treatment. The ESMO-MCBS is an important first step to the critical public policy issue of value in cancer care, helping to frame the appropriate use of limited public and personal resources to deliver cost-effective and affordable cancer care. The ESMO-MCBS will be a dynamic tool and its criteria will be revised on a regular basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major risk factor for infection-related morbidity and mortality and also a significant dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment. Patients developing severe (grade 3/4) or febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy frequently receive dose reductions and/or delays to their chemotherapy. This may impact the success of treatment, particularly when treatment intent is either curative or to prolong survival. In Europe, prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), such as filgrastim (including approved biosimilars), lenograstim or pegfilgrastim is available to reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, the use of G-CSF prophylactic treatment varies widely in clinical practice, both in the timing of therapy and in the patients to whom it is offered. The need for generally applicable, European-focused guidelines led to the formation of a European Guidelines Working Party by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the publication in 2006 of guidelines for the use of G-CSF in adult cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced FN. A new systematic literature review has been undertaken to ensure that recommendations are current and provide guidance on clinical practice in Europe. We recommend that patient-related adverse risk factors, such as elderly age (⩾65years) and neutrophil count be evaluated in the overall assessment of FN risk before administering each cycle of chemotherapy. It is important that after a previous episode of FN, patients receive prophylactic administration of G-CSF in subsequent cycles. We provide an expanded list of common chemotherapy regimens considered to have a high (⩾20%) or intermediate (10–20%) risk of FN. Prophylactic G-CSF continues to be recommended in patients receiving a chemotherapy regimen with high risk of FN. When using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in 10–20% of patients, particular attention should be given to patient-related risk factors that may increase the overall risk of FN. In situations where dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy strategies have survival benefits, prophylactic G-CSF support is recommended. Similarly, if reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity or density are known to be associated with a poor prognosis, primary G-CSF prophylaxis may be used to maintain chemotherapy. Clinical evidence shows that filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim have clinical efficacy and we recommend the use of any of these agents to prevent FN and FN-related complications where indicated. Filgrastim biosimilars are also approved for use in Europe. While other forms of G-CSF, including biosimilars, are administered by a course of daily injections, pegfilgrastim allows once-per-cycle administration. Choice of formulation remains a matter for individual clinical judgement. Evidence from multiple low level studies derived from audit data and clinical practice suggests that some patients receive suboptimal daily G-CSFs; the use of pegfilgrastim may avoid this problem. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]