Search

Background: Outcomes for patients with blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia are poor. Long-term survival depends on reaching a second chronic phase, followed by allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated whether the novel combination of the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor ponatinib with fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin (FLAG-IDA) could improve response and optimise allogeneic HSCT outcomes in patients with blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. The aim was to identify a dose of ponatinib, which combined with FLAG-IDA, showed clinically meaningful activity and tolerability., Methods: MATCHPOINT was a seamless, phase 1/2, multicentre trial done in eight UK Trials Acceleration Programme-funded centres. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥16 years) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive or BCR-ABL1-positive blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, suitable for intensive chemotherapy. Participants received up to two cycles of ponatinib with FLAG-IDA. Experimental doses of oral ponatinib (given from day 1 to day 28 of FLAG-IDA) were between 15 mg alternate days and 45 mg once daily and the starting dose was 30 mg once daily. Intravenous fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 for 5 days), cytarabine (2 g/m 2 for 5 days), and idarubicin (8 mg/m 2 for 3 days), and subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (if used), were delivered according to local protocols. We used an innovative EffTox design to investigate the activity and tolerability of ponatinib-FLAG-IDA; the primary endpoints were the optimal ponatinib dose meeting prespecified thresholds of activity (inducement of second chronic phase defined as either haematological or minor cytogenetic response) and tolerability (dose-limiting toxicties). Analyses were planned on an intention-to-treat basis. MATCHPOINT was registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, ISRCTN98986889, and has completed recruitment; the final results are presented., Findings: Between March 19, 2015, and April 26, 2018, 17 patients (12 men, five women) were recruited, 16 of whom were evaluable for the coprimary outcomes. Median follow-up was 41 months (IQR 36-48). The EffTox model simultaneously considered clinical responses and dose-limiting toxicities, and determined the optimal ponatinib dose as 30 mg daily, combined with FLAG-IDA. 11 (69%) of 16 patients were in the second chronic phase after one cycle of treatment. Four (25%) patients had a dose-limiting toxicity (comprising cardiomyopathy and grade 4 increased alanine aminotransferase, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, grade 3 increased amylase, and grade 4 increased alanine aminotransferase), fulfilling the criteria for clinically relevant activity and toxicity. 12 (71%) of 17 patients proceeded to allogeneic HSCT. The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were lung infection (n=4 [24%]), fever (n=3 [18%]), and hypocalcaemia (n=3 [18%]). There were 12 serious adverse events in 11 (65%) patients. Three (18%) patients died due to treatment-related events (due to cardiomyopathy, pulmonary haemorrhage, and bone marrow aplasia)., Interpretation: Ponatinib-FLAG-IDA can induce second chronic phase in patients with blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, representing an active salvage therapy to bridge to allogeneic HSCT. The number of treatment-related deaths is not in excess of what would be expected in this very high-risk group of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. The efficient EffTox method is a model for investigating novel therapies in ultra-orphan cancers., Funding: Blood Cancer UK and Incyte., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MC has received research funding from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyclacel, and Takeda/Incyte; is an advisory board member for Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Incyte, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer; has received honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer, and Gilead. JLB is on the advisory board for and has received honoraria from Incyte. KR is on the advisory board for Novartis; and has received honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo. KB is employed by UCB; has received personal fees from Eli Lilly and Invex Therapeutics; has received reimbursement from Merck and Roche; and holds shares in AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. HDL has received research funding from Incyte and Bristol Myers Squibb; and has received speaker fees from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. REC has received research support and honoraria from Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb; and has received honoraria from Pfizer in the past 3 years. MLS is on the advisory board for Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer; and has received honoraria from ARIAD. DM has received honoraria and been part of the speakers bureau for Novartis, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. CY has received personal fees from Celgene and Faron Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response., Method: We analyzed 1222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (a) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (b) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs, and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone), and (c) the time to best response (Early ie, best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good ie, VGPR or better vs Poor)., Results: The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (P = .65) or OS (P = .61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (P = .31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (P = .83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, P-value = .02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (≥VGPR) post-transplant., Conclusion: The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

As part of the randomized MRC Myeloma IX trial, we compared an attenuated regimen of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTDa; n = 426) with melphalan and prednisolone (MP; n = 423) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoints were overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). The overall response rate was significantly higher with CTDa than MP (63.8% vs 32.6%; P < .0001), primarily because of increases in the rate of complete responses (13.1% vs 2.4%) and very good partial responses (16.9% vs 1.7%). Progression-free survival and OS were similar between groups. In this population, OS correlated with the depth of response (P < .0001) and favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization profile (P < .001). CTDa was associated with higher rates of thromboembolic events, constipation, infection, and neuropathy than MP. In elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (median age, 73 years), CTDa produced higher response rates than MP but was not associated with improved survival outcomes. We highlight the importance of cytogenetic profiling at diagnosis and effective management of adverse events. This trial was registered at International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number as #68454111.

The role of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in relapsed follicular lymphoma remains controversial. This study analysed 126 patients with relapsed, advanced stage follicular lymphoma who received BEAM (BCNU [carmustine], cytarabine, etoposide, melphalan)-alemtuzumab allogeneic HSCT (BEAM-allo) (n = 44) or BEAM-autologous HSCT (BEAM-auto) (n = 82). The BEAM-allo group had a younger median age (48 years vs. 56 years, P < 0.001) but received a higher median number of therapies pretransplant (P = 0.015) compared with the BEAM-auto group. There was a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the BEAM-allo group compared with the BEAM-auto group at 1 year (20% vs. 2%, P = 0.001). Older age and heavily pretreated patients were associated with a higher NRM and poorer survival in the BEAM-allo group. There was, however, a significantly lower relapse rate (20% vs. 43%, P = 0.01) at 3 years with BEAM-alemtuzumab, with no relapses after 2 years, compared with a continued pattern of relapse in the autologous group. No difference in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.99) or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.90) was identified at 3 years, whereas a plateau in OS and DFS with crossing of the survival curves in favour of BEAM-allo group was observed. Furthermore, the ability to re-induce remissions with donor leucocytes provides additional benefit in favour of allogeneic HSCT.

A total of 143 patients with relapsed (n = 90), primary refractory (n = 32) and first line chemotherapy responsive (n = 21) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin disease (HD) were treated with IVE (ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin) chemotherapy with the intent to proceed to high-dose therapy with either autologous or allogeneic transplantation, following peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation. A major response (complete/partial response) to IVE was seen in 115 patients (80.4%) with 5-year overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) of 53% and 43%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed overall response rates of 93.1% for HD with a 5-year OS and EFS of 62% and 52% respectively, while NHL showed response rates of 78.0% with 5-year OS and EFS of 50% and 39% respectively. The median number of CD34 +ve cells mobilised following IVE was 7.86 x 10(6) (range 1.72-42.91 x 10(6)), with 60% mobilising >2 x 10(6)/kg in a single collection. Grade IV neutropenia was seen in 79.6% patients and 77/270 cycles required intravenous antibiotic treatment. We conclude that IVE has a high response rate across a range of refractory and relapsed lymphoma with acceptable toxicity and excellent PBSC mobilising characteristics.

Autologous transplantation has an established role in the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders, but allogeneic transplantation remains controversial. In an attempt to reduce the high procedure-related mortality reported with allografting in lymphoma, we have used BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan), a standard conditioning regimen for autologous transplantation. As BEAM may be insufficiently immunosuppressive to permit durable engraftment in the allogeneic setting, patients received additional pretransplant immunosuppression with the anti-CD52 antibody CAMPATH-1G from day -5 to day -1. Twelve patients (median age 46 years) underwent allogeneic transplantation for lymphoma (n = 11) or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 1) from HLA-identical (n = 9) or mismatched (n = 3) sibling donors. Cyclosporin A and methotrexate were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. One patient died of progressive lymphoma at day +12, the remaining 11 patients engrafted rapidly, with eight demonstrating full donor chimerism. One patient had an episode of rejection and received a further stem cell infusion with sustained recovery. Only one patient developed GVHD (grade I). The low incidence of acute GVHD may be in part related to persisting levels of in vivo CAMPATH-IG at the time of transplantation. Of 11 evaluable patients, nine achieved complete remission (CR), and a further patient achieved CR after donor lymphocyte infusion at 5 months. Our preliminary experience is that this regimen was well tolerated with a low risk of GVHD and appears no more toxic than a BEAM autograft. Further follow-up is required to see whether the low incidence of GVHD impacts upon relapse risk.

The prognosis for patients with secondary AML, primary resistant AML or ALL and early (<12 months) relapse of acute leukaemia remains extremely poor with conventional chemotherapy. As part of a strategy to improve the outcome for these patients we have treated 22 consecutive patients (18 AML, four ALL, median age 35 years) with either primary resistant disease (n=3), early relapsed leukaemia (n= 12) or secondary AML (n= 7, four RAEBt, two antecedant ALL and one antecedant Hodgkin's disease) with 'FLAG' induction chemotherapy with the aim of proceeding to early allogeneic transplantation either from sibling or unrelated donors. Eighteen patients achieved CR after one course of FLAG, including five patients who had documented p-glycoprotein-induced multidrug resistance and 10 patients with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Eight patients were consolidated with a second course of FLAG prior to transplantation and so far 16 patients have undergone allogeneic transplantation, 10 from unrelated donors and six from sibling donors (one mismatched). By the time of transplant three patients had progressed and were in early relapse and all have relapsed post BMT. Of the remaining 13 patients transplanted in remission, nine remain in CCR at a range of 4-26 months, three have died of transplant-related complications (18%) and one patient has relapsed. We conclude that the use of FLAG induction therapy followed by early allogeneic transplantation from either a sibling or unrelated donor can be an effective strategy for the treatment of this difficult group of young patients with poor risk acute leukaemia and appears to be associated with a low procedure-related risk.