Search

In order to identify factors predictive of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, we reviewed the histories of 579 patients treated with epirubicin-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival plots, Cox's regression analysis and competing risk analysis using the cumulative incidence. Median follow-up-time was 137 months (range 0-183+). In this period, one hundred and twenty-four patients (21.4%) developed CNS metastasis. Lung, liver, and lymph node metastases and oestrogen receptor negative or unknown tumor were predictive as well. However, increased pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration in serum above the upper normal limits was the strongest single risk factor and should therefore be measured. The risk of CNS metastasis differed considerably among risk groups. Patients without risk factors had a cumulative incidence on 9%, compared to a cumulative incidence of 42%, when the serum LDH concentration was elevated to more than twice the upper normal limits.

Background: To determine the cardiotoxicity of paclitaxel (T) plus doxorubicin (A) combination therapy in women with advanced breast cancer. To define a dose range of A for use in AT., Patients and Methods: The effect of cumulative A dose on risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) and alterations of myocardial contractility (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] decrease > or = 20% or to <50%) was estimated from pooled data from 10 trials of AT., Results: Thirty-one of 657 patients (4.7%) developed CHF at a median of 6.6 months (range 0.3-24.6) after initiation of AT. CHF was stabilized in 29 patients at a median of 17.3 months after diagnosis (range 4.1-31.2 months). The risk of developing CHF was < or = 5% at a total A dose < or = 380 mg/m2. In patients who received a total A dose > 440 mg/m2, the incidence of CHF was >25% but similar to that of A monotherapy. The risk of CHF was similar in women receiving AT or A monotherapy at a dose < or = 380 mg/m2 (2%-3%). LVEF progressively decreased in patients who received AT, especially at a cumulative A dose > 380 mg/m2. LVEF decreases were more frequent in patients who later developed CHF, but the majority of CHF patients did not experience LVEF alterations prior to symptoms. LVEF recovered after discontinuation of A in 25 of 67 women who developed LVEF < 50%., Conclusion: The reported cardiac effects are consistent with anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity. AT is associated with a cardiac risk similar to that of A monotherapy up to a cumulative A dose of 340-380 mg/m2.

Purpose: A prospective randomized trial in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was performed to determine if intensification of the platinum dose by giving cisplatin and carboplatin in combination to patients with SCLC yields higher response rates and survival, than carboplatin alone in a combination chemotherapy regimen., Patients and Methods: Between September 1992 and October 1997, 280 patients were included in a two armed prospective randomized trial, stratified by stage of disease, LDH and performance status. The treatment was in arm A: three courses induction chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 4, day 1), cisplatin (35 mg/m2, days 2 and 3), teniposide (50 mg/m2, day 1-5), vincristine (1.3 mg/m2, day 1) every four weeks, followed by cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2, day 84), 4-epirubicin (4-epidoxorubicin) (150 mg/m2, day 112), and finally one course cisplatin, carboplatin, teniposide and vincristine, (days 140-144). Arm B also comprised a total of six courses, identical to those in arm A except for omission of cisplatin., Results: There were no significant differences in the overall treatment outcome for A vs. B, in terms of response rates (72% in both arms), complete response rates (40% and 34%, respectively), or median survival (314 days and 294 days, respectively). However, for patients with limited disease both the CR rate (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.05), overall survival (log-rank test, P < 0.05), and the two-year survival rate (11% vs. 6%, P < 0.05) were higher in the high-dose platinum arm compared to the carboplatin alone arm., Conclusions: The intensification of platinum dose (cisplatin plus carboplatin) in combination chemotherapy significantly increased the complete response rate, overall survival and number of two-year survivors among SCLC patients with limited disease compared to combination therapy with carboplatin alone, suggesting that a more aggressive treatment to this category of patients is worthwhile, while no difference in treatment outcome was observed for patients with extensive disease.

Effective antiemetic treatment of patients who have previously experienced chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of a single intravenous dose of granisetron plus a 3-day oral treatment with prednisolone 25 mg once a day plus metopimazine 30 mg four times a day in patients refractory to previous antiemetic treatment with granisetron or with prednisolone plus metopimazine. The study population was made up of 25 consecutive women with stage I or II breast cancer, who were treated with multiple cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil plus methotrexate or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin plus fluorouracil given i.v. every 3 weeks. Patients received the three-drug combination of antiemetics during a total of 113 cycles of chemotherapy. No emetic episodes were reported in 88.9% cycles on day 1, in 94.7% cycles on days 2 through 5 and in 85.8% cycles on days 1 through 5 after chemotherapy. No nausea was reported in 43.4% cycles on day 1, in 49.6% cycles on days 2 through 5 and in 34.5% cycles on days 1 through 5. Nineteen patients (76.0%) completed the scheduled nine cycles of chemotherapy, 1 being withdrawn because of > or =5 emetic episodes and 5, because they were not satisfied with the antiemetic treatment. The treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, granisetron plus prednisolone plus metopimazine is a highly effective antiemetic treatment in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy refractory to antiemetic therapy with granisetron or prednisolone plus metopimazine.

The efficacy of combined endocrine therapy with tamoxifen (TAM), aminoglutethimide (AG), and hydrocortisone (H) or tamoxifen and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was evaluated against treatment with tamoxifen alone in 311 patients above 65 years of age with a first recurrence of a metastatic breast cancer. A total of 279 patients were eligible. The response rates were assessed for 258 fully evaluable patients and were the following for the TAM (N = 94), the TAM+AG+H (N = 83), and the TAM+FLU (N = 81) groups, respectively, PR: 14, 18, and 21%, and CR: 20, 11, and 23%. The overall response rates are not statistically different (p = 0.30). The 95% CL of difference in response rates for TAM vs. TAM+AG+H are -9-19% and for TAM vs. TAM+FLU -4-25%. Time to treatment failure was comparable with median values of 9.2, 7.7, and 9.2 months in the TAM, TAM+AG+H, and TAM + FLU group, respectively (p = 0.17). The corresponding figures for survival are median times of 22.0, 24.1, and 21.1 months with a p-value of 0.62. Toxicity was more pronounced in both the combined treatment groups, and could in most instances be attributed to treatment with either AG+H or FLU. Currently, new specific aromatase inhibitors with lesser toxicity than AG are being evaluated in combination with TAM for treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. In conclusion, the simultaneous use of TAM and AG +H or FLU does not seem to improve the therapeutic efficacy in elderly postmenopausal patients with metastatic disease. So far, combined endocrine therapy in this group of patients should only be used in the context of clinical trials.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of epirubicin to that of the combination of epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer., Patients and Methods: A total of 155 patients were randomized to receive either epirubicin (70 mg/m2) days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks or epirubicin (60 mg/m2) days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin (100 mg/m2) day 1 every 4 weeks. Epirubicin was continued until disease progression or to a cumulative dose of 1000 mg/m2. Cisplatin was discontinued after six cycles. In 45 premenopausal women an oophorectomy was performed. None of the evaluable patients had received chemotherapy for metastatic disease., Results: Among evaluable patients (74 in the epirubicin group and 65 in the epirubicin plus cisplatin group) there were 19% vs 29% complete responses, and 42% vs 37% partial responses, with no significant difference. In the epirubicin plus cisplatin group the response rate was significantly higher in previously untreated patients as compared with patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy (74% vs 55%, P = 0.002). Median times to disease progression were 8.4 months in the epirubicin group and 15.3 months in the epirubicin plus cisplatin group (P = 0.045). Median survival times were 15.1 and 21.5 months, respectively (P = 0.41). In the epirubicin plus cisplatin group leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly more frequent, 29% of the patients developed mild to moderate peripheral neurotoxicity, 34% reported tinnitus and hearing changes, 6 patients developed nephrotoxicity (one died due to nephrotic syndrome), and 3 patients developed leukaemia (two died of this cause). Congestive heart failure occurred in six patients in the epirubicin group and three patients in the epirubicin plus cisplatin group., Conclusion: Cisplatin plus epirubicin is an active, although highly toxic regimen when used as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. The time to disease progression was significantly longer in the cisplatin plus epirubicin group (increased by 82%). Due to toxicity, the combination regimen cannot be recommended. However, the study indicated a very high activity of cisplatin in advanced breast cancer. Studies of first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer including cisplatin or other platin derivatives in combination with, for example, the taxanes are suggested.

Following modified radical mastectomy, pre- and perimenopausal (amenorrhoea for < 5 years) patients with stage II or III breast cancer received CMF (cyclophosphamide 600, methotrexate 40, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks, 9 cycles). The effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) to adjuvant chemotherapy was examined by randomisation either to no additional treatment (n = 314), or concurrently TAM 30 mg daily for 1 year (n = 320). 40% had positive, 12% negative and 48% unknown receptor status. One year after surgery 21% versus 35% (CMF + TAM versus CMF) were still menstruating (P < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 12.2 years there was no difference in RFS (10-year RFS 34% versus 35%, P = 0.81) or OS (45% versus 46%, P = 0.73). In a Cox proportional hazards model, tumour size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, frequency of metastatic nodes in relation to total number of nodes removed, degree of anaplasia, age, and menostasia within the first year after operation were significant independent prognostic factors for RFS, and the same factors except age for OS. No significant interactions with TAM were seen. Thus, in this group of pre- and perimenopausal high-risk early breast cancer patients with heterogeneous receptor status given CMF i.v., concurrent TAM for 1 year did not improve the outcome. These results do not exclude that receptor positive patients may benefit from adjuvant TAM for longer periods given sequentially to chemotherapy.

Background: Paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin are each active in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and with different modes of action. Hence, a phase II study combining these drugs were conducted., Patients and Methods: Treatment was paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 day 1 and 15, with gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 day 1, 8, and 15, every four weeks. Patients had previously untreated NSCLC, measurable disease, age 18-70 years, performance status < or = 2, and no brain metastases., Results: Among 49 patients, 6 (group 1) received chemotherapy as described above, while 43 patients (group 2) did not receive gemcitabine day 8. In group 1, all experienced grade 4 neutropenia and four achieved a partial response (67%). In group 2, neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 58%, with one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic death. No other grade 4 toxicities occurred, while grade 3 toxicity occurred with respect to thrombocytopenia (9%), nausea/vomiting (12%), neurotoxicity (12%), and nephrotoxicity (7%). There were 3 complete and 20 partial responses (response rate 54%, 95% confidence limits 38%-69%), median response duration 29 weeks (range 10-66+), median time to progression 28 weeks (range 4-66+), median survival 46 weeks (4-89+) and one-year survival rate 42%., Conclusion: This regimen of paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin has neutropenia as dose limiting toxicity, but septicemic episodes were rare and toxic death did not occur. Other grade 4 toxicities than neutropenia did not occur. The regimen appears safe and with a noteworthy activity both in terms of response rate, time to progression, and survival.

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel study compared the anti-emetic efficacy and tolerability of the serotonin antagonist granisetron with prednisolone plus the dopamine D2 antagonist metopimazine during nine cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy naive women with stage I or II breast cancer scheduled to intravenous cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and methotrexate or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil every 3 weeks were included. Patients received a single intravenous dose of granisetron 3 mg or a 3-day oral treatment with prednisolone 25 mg once a day plus metopimazine 30 mg four times a day. A total of 223 women were enrolled and 218 patients (97.8%) were evaluable for efficacy. Granisetron (n = 109) was superior to prednisolone plus metopimazine (n = 109) in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting during the first cycle of chemotherapy (P < 0.001) and prednisolone plus metopimazine was superior on days 2-5 (P = 0.002). Overall, granisetron was superior on days 1-5 (P = 0.009). The median number of cycles completed with granisetron was five (95% confidence interval 4-6) compared with two (95% confidence interval 2-2) for prednisolone plus metopimazine (P = 0.0019). Constipation and rash were reported more frequently with granisetron (P < 0.001 and P = 0.043 respectively) and palpitations more frequently with prednisolone plus metopimazine (P = 0.015). In conclusion, the number of cycles completed with granisetron was significantly higher than the number completed with prednisolone plus metopimazine, but the anti-emetic efficacy of both treatments declined during multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Based on an increased frequency of early death (death within the first treatment cycle) in our two latest randomized trials of combination chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), we wanted to identify patients at risk of early non-toxic death (ENTD) and early toxic death (ETD). Data were stored in a database and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for early death. During the first cycle, 118 out of 937 patients (12.6%) died. In 38 patients (4%), the cause of death was sepsis. Significant risk factors were age, performance status (PS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and treatment with epipodophyllotoxins and platinum in the first cycle (EP). Risk factors for ENTD were age, PS and LDH. Extensive stage had a hazard ratio of 1.9 (P = 0.07). Risk factors for ETD were EP, PS and LDH, whereas age and stage were not. For EP, the hazard ratio was as high as 6.7 (P = 0.0001). We introduced a simple prognostic algorithm including performance status, LDH and age. Using a prognostic algorithm to exclude poor-risk patients from trials, we could minimize early death, improve long-term survival and increase the survival differences between different regimens. We suggest that other groups evaluate our algorithm and exclude poor prognosis patients from trials of dose intensification.

Because both vindesine and gemcitabine are active drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with different modes of action and only partly overlapping toxicity, a phase II study was performed. Gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, while vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered weekly for 7 weeks, then every 2 weeks. A total of 42 patients with nonresectable NSCLC were included. The median age of patients was 56 years; 57% were men, 52% had adenocarcinoma, 31% squamous cell carcinoma and 17% had large-cell carcinoma. The performance status ranged from 0 to 2 with 83% in performance status 1. The majority (55%) had stage IV disease, while 40% had stage III B and 5% stage III A disease. WHO grade 3-4 leucopenia occurred in five patients (12%) and 9% had grade 4 neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 was observed in six patients (15%). There were no septic death or bleeding episodes. One patient had a transient WHO grade 4 increase in bilirubin, and four patients had a decrease in glomerular filtration rate below the normal limit; one of these patients developed a non-reversible renal insufficiency. Ten patients (24%) complained of dyspnoea of uncertain mechanism, possibly involving bronchoconstriction. There were one complete and seven partial responses among 40 assessable patients (20%, 95% confidence limits 9-36%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range 11-83 weeks) and median survival time 31 weeks (range 2-171 weeks). The current combination of gemcitabine and vindesine does not appear to be promising for further examination because of the toxicity and somewhat disappointing activity.

To evaluate the substitution of methotrexate with doxorubicin (Dox) in CMF-(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) containing regimen for advanced breast cancer, 415 postmenopausal patients below the age of 66 years, naïve to chemotherapy, were accrued from 1980 to 1984 and followed-up until 1995. They received tamoxifen 30 mg daily orally and by randomisation either 400 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 doxorubicin and 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (CAF) or 40 mg/m2 methotrexate instead of Dox (CMF) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 + 8 repeated every 4 weeks. Dox was substituted by methotrexate at a cumulative dose of 550 mg/m2. Among 341 eligible patients the response rate and median time to progression was significantly in favour of CAF: 53% CAF versus 36% CMF (P = 0.002) and 11.8 months CAF versus 6.5 months CMF (P = 0.001). Median duration of response was 19.5 CAF versus 18.0 CMF months, and survival 20.8 CAF versus 17.4 CMF months (non-significant). The two regimens were equimyelotoxic. There were no treatment-related fatalities but 1 patient with congestive heart failure on CAF was reported. Nausea/vomiting, stomatitis and infections were modest in both groups, whilst alopecia was more common with CAF. Regression analysis showed that long recurrence free interval, good performance status, and no visceral involvement was significantly related to long-term survival, whilst the treatment regimen was not. It is concluded that in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced breast cancer Dox-containing regimens are superior and remain the first choice of chemotherapy, especially in patients with visceral metastases, until newer drugs and combinations have been proven to be superior.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are new cytotoxic agents that have been used both as single agents and in combination, particularly with cisplatin, in the therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with promising results. The lack of overlapping toxicities and different mechanisms of action of gemcitabine and paclitaxel make the combination of these drugs appealing in the treatment of NSCLC. A number of phase I and II trials are evaluating the use of this combination of cytotoxic agents as first-line therapy and as second-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In ongoing phase II trials using a 21-day schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel therapy appears to be well-tolerated, with response rates ranging from 29% to 58% and hematologic toxicities that are mild to moderate in severity. Other reported toxicities included alopecia, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms, which were also mild to moderate. However, grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was also reported. In conclusion, preliminary results from these early phase II trials of gemcitabine/paclitaxel combination therapy in advanced NSCLC are encouraging.

During the past two decades many different treatment regimens of combination chemotherapy have been applied in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study was carried out to identify whether these modifications have resulted in an improved overall survival for extensive stage during the past two decades. In total, 1111 patients with extensive stage SCLC were included in six consecutive randomised trials in our setting from 1973 until 1992. Of these, 526 patients treated in the early period (1973-1981) were compared with 585 patients treated in the late period (1981-1992) with respect to pretreatment prognostic factors, staging, treatment and outcome. No change in the distribution of prognostic factors was detected and the frequency of patients with extensive stage was equal in the two periods, and no difference in overall response rates and survival was observed (P = 0.49). Median survival in the two periods was 208 days and 215 days, respectively. No stage migration or treatment-related improved outcome was observed in extensive disease. We suggest restricting aggressive treatment to patients with favorable prognosis and long-term survival as a realistic aim.

The combination of bolus doxorubicin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) as a 3-hour infusion is highly active in patients with metastatic breast cancer, but it has considerable cardiotoxicity. In this ongoing study, the potential effect of increasing the interval between administration of a short infusion of doxorubicin followed by a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel was evaluated. Included were patients with metastatic breast cancer, who received doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 at intervals of 30 minutes, 4 hours, and 24 hours every 3 weeks. As of February 1997, 34 patients have been enrolled, two patients are too early to evaluate, and 13 are continuing treatment. The preliminary response rate is 69% (95% confidence interval, 50% to 84%), ranging from 60% to 80% within the three schedules. The main toxicities consisted of grade 3/4 neutropenia in 65% of all courses, with febrile neutropenia in 2%. Stomatitis and paresthesia were rare. To date, eight of 32 patients have developed abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction values and one patient has developed congestive heart failure. Our preliminary conclusions are that bolus doxorubicin followed by a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is highly active against metastatic breast cancer. The potential for cardiotoxicity with the regimen is reduced considerably if the maximum recommended cumulative dose of doxorubicin is reduced to 360 mg/m2 with a maximum single dose of 50 mg/m2.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and cisplatin are cytotoxic drugs active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that possess additive cytotoxicity in animal tumors. Paclitaxel and cisplatin are active in patients with advanced NSCLC when given on a 3-weekly schedule. In an attempt to increase activity, we designed a phase II study with a biweekly schedule. Paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion, followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m2 via intravenous infusion. Treatment was scheduled every 2 weeks. Of the 42 patients treated, 19 were men and 23 were women, with a median age of 54 years (range, 31 to 69 years). Four patients had stage IIIA NSCLC, 18 stage IIIB, and 20 stage IV. Median World Health Organization performance status was 1 (range, 0 to 2), and adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (52%). A median of nine cycles was administered (range, one to 24 cycles), with more than 360 cycles administered. Rates of frequency of World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia, 20%; thrombocytopenia, 2%; nausea/vomiting, 7% (despite prophylactic treatment with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists plus prednisolone); neurotoxicity, 2%; and nephrotoxicity, 2%. There were three septicemic episodes, no bleeding episodes, and no toxic deaths. Dose reduction was performed in 15 patients (36%), due to nephrotoxicity in 14 cases. Treatment delay was necessary in 23 patients (55%), most often due to neutropenia (nine cases). Forty patients are currently evaluable for response, with two complete and 15 partial responses (overall response rate, 43%; 95% confidence limits, 27% to 59%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range, 9 to 85 weeks). The biweekly schedule of paclitaxel plus cisplatin has noteworthy activity in patients with NSCLC. A relatively large fraction of patients required either dose reduction and/or treatment delay, but World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 toxicity was rare, apart from the neutropenia that caused only a few septicemic episodes.

For the past decades the anthracyclines have been regarded as among the most active drugs for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. However, the 5-year survival rate in patients with stage IV breast cancer continues to be below 20%, and new active drugs and drug combinations clearly must be explored. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been demonstrated to be highly effective in treating patients with advanced breast cancer, including those with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, a fact that has led to efforts to combine paclitaxel and anthracyclines. Several studies aiming to define the optimal dose and schedule of combination paclitaxel/doxorubicin have now been completed or are ongoing. Phase I/II studies have yielded encouraging preliminary response rates but quite variable toxicity profiles depending on the schedule used. These clinical trials involving combination paclitaxel/doxorubicin are reviewed, with special emphasis on the short-infusion trials.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is active against advanced breast cancer and anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin followed by a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in women with advanced breast cancer. Participants could have received at most one prior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, but no previous exposure to anthracyclines or taxanes was permitted. The patients were treated every 3 weeks with doxorubicin (50 or 60 mg/m2) followed 30 minutes later by paclitaxel (155, 175, or 200 mg/m2). After reaching the maximum cumulative doxorubicin dose, treatment could be continued with paclitaxel alone. Thirty women were included, of whom 29 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 83% (95% confidence interval, 64% to 94%), with 24% of patients attaining complete remission. Median response duration for complete responders was 8+ months (range, 4 to 13 months) and median time to progression was 9 months (range, 2 to 18 months). Main toxicities were neutropenia, paresthesia, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, myalgia, and cardiotoxicity. In 15 patients (50%), the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to below normal levels; six patients (20%) developed congestive heart failure. In conclusion, the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel is highly active; dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia, neuropathy, and cumulative cardiotoxicity.

Background: Paclitaxel has shown activity in metastatic breast cancer, including anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. The efficacy, toxicity and optimal scheduling of the combination of the two drugs needs to be defined., Patients and Methods: Thirty women with advanced breast cancer who had undergone at most one prior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, were treated at three different dose levels with doxorubicin (50, 60 and 60 mg/m2) followed 30 minutes later by paclitaxel (155, 175 and 200 mg/m2, respectively) every 3 weeks., Results: The overall response rate was 83% (95% CI: 64-94), with 24% of patients achieving CR. The median response duration for complete responders was 11 months (range 4-14+) and median survival 18 months (range 3-28+). Two hundred sixty-five treatment courses were given (median 9, range 3-13) and the median cumulative dose of doxorubicin was 369 mg/m2 (range 114-550). The main toxicities were neutropenia, parestesia, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, myalgia and cardiotoxicity. Fifteen patients (50%) had reductions of left ventricular ejection fraction of below normal levels and 6 of these patients (20%) developed congestive heart failure., Conclusion: The combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel is highly active, but is accompanied by the dose-limiting toxic effects of neutropenia, neuropathy and cardiotoxicity.

Purpose: The introduction of platinum compounds and epipodophyllotoxins in combination with vincristine as induction chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in order to: (1) compare the efficacy of cisplatin with that of carboplatin in combination with teniposide and vincristine as inducers of remission over three cycles; (2) compare the toxicity pattern of carboplatin and of cisplatin when given in combination regimens; and (3) compare a chemotherapeutic regimen consisting of three alternating combinations with that of regimens consisting of four alternating combinations., Patients and Methods: From November 1985 to September 1991, 484 consecutive, previously untreated patients with SCLC, performance status 0-4, entered a three armed randomized trial with three cycles of cisplatin (arm I) or carboplatin (arm II) in combination with teniposide and vincristine alternating with three treatment blocks of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, lomustine and vincristine (block A), doxorubicin and vincristine (block B) and cisplatin, hexamethylmelamine and vindesine (block C) versus alternating treatment with block A, B and C (arm III)., Results: No difference in efficacy or toxicity was found between cisplatin and carboplatin at the present dosages. Induction chemotherapy with teniposide plus cisplatin or carboplatin did not result in higher complete response rates (objective response rates 63%, 72% and 65%, respectively) or in significantly greater toxicity, but overall survival was superior compared with the arm III (log-rank test, P = 0.02). The median survival difference was 7 weeks, and two year survival 15% versus 9%. The Cox regression analysis identified the arm III, poor performance status and elevated LDH as factors with statistically significant negative impact on survival., Conclusion: Cisplatin and carboplatin produced similar response and survival rates and similar toxicity. Induction with platinum and epipodophyllotoxins did not improve objective response rates, but significantly improved survival without increasing the toxicity.

The activity of single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been documented in untreated and previously treated metastatic breast cancer, including both patients with anthracycline-resistant disease and those with extensive pretreatment. Such activity has prompted investigations of the optimal doses and schedules of paclitaxel/doxorubicin combinations. With one exception, paclitaxel has been administered as either a 24- or a 3-hour infusion, while the administration times for doxorubicin vary from bolus injection to 72-hour infusion. Results of these completed phase I and II trials are reviewed. Also reported are two European trials that have achieved promising results. In Milan, a phase I/II trial has shown a preliminary response rate exceeding 90% in 32 chemotherapy-naive patients treated with an alternating schedule of paclitaxel given over 3 hours and intravenous bolus doxorubicin. At doses of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, the dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia, oral mucositis, myalgias, and peripheral neuropathy. Congestive heart failure occurred in six patients. A phase I/II study of a 30-minute doxorubicin infusion preceding a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion every 3 weeks in minimally pretreated patients also is reported. Of 29 patients evaluable for response, 17 have achieved partial responses and seven complete responses, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% confidence interval, 79% to 99%). Toxicities observed were grades 3 to 4 neutropenia and moderate paresthesias, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, myalgia, and mucositis. Cardiotoxicity also occurred, as 15 patients had a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction measured by isotope cardiography. Six of these developed congestive heart failure. This effect has been observed only in studies using short infusions of both drugs, and it is now being investigated whether lowering the peak doxorubicin concentration will preclude it.

The activity of single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) against untreated and previously treated metastatic breast cancer (documented in anthracycline-resistant disease and in extensively pretreated patients as well) has prompted investigations of the optimal doses and schedules of paclitaxel/doxorubicin combinations. With one exception, paclitaxel has been administered in either a 24- or a 3-hour infusion, while the administration times for doxorubicin vary from bolus injection to a 72-hour infusion. Results of these completed phase I and II trials are reviewed. Also reported are two ongoing European trials that have achieved promising preliminary results. In Milan, a phase I trial has achieved a preliminary response rate exceeding 90% in 30 chemotherapy-naive patients treated with an alternating schedule of paclitaxel over 3 hours and intravenous bolus doxorubicin. At doses of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, the dose-limiting toxicity is leukopenia and mucositis. Furthermore, congestive heart failure has occurred in six patients. We are conducting a phase I/II study in minimally pretreated patients, with a 30-minute doxorubicin infusion preceding a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion every 3 weeks. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, five have achieved partial responses and three complete responses. (Another five partial and two complete responses need confirmation.) Of the two dose levels now given, all responses occurred at the higher paclitaxel/doxorubicin level, 175 and 60 mg/m2, respectively. Despite grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 31% and 60% of courses, respectively, only six patients have been hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. Of concern, the left ventricular ejection fraction has decreased to below normal in six patients and two have developed symptomatic congestive heart failure. Whether lowering the peak doxorubicin concentration will preclude this effect, which has been observed only in the studies using short infusions of both drugs, is under investigation.

The present article is a review of recent treatment protocols for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCCL) treated in Copenhagen from 1985 to 1990. Furthermore, preliminary data on long-term survivors (> 5 years) from 9 treatment protocols since 1973 are reviewed. For 484 patients < or = 70 years old, no survival difference was observed between 2 platinum (cis-platinum or carboplatin) containing regimens, while the survival was better in these two induction regimens compared to an alternating control arm. For patients > 70 years old, Etoposide (VP-16) and Teniposide (VM-26) were compared in a randomized fashion. Both drugs were highly active, and no significant difference in activity was observed. All together 1527 patients have been included in clinical trials in the Copenhagen Lung Cancer Study Group since 1973. The rates of 5- and 10-years survivors were 3.5% and 1.8% respectively. Long-term survival can be achieved in all stages of SCCL.

The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the therapeutic activity and toxicity of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in previously untreated patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Treatment consisted of an intravenous bolus injection of doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 followed by a 24-h infusion of ifosfamide at 5 g/m2 plus mesna, with therapy being repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Of the 203 patients entered, 175 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 35% (95% confidence interval, 28%-42%), with 9% of patients achieving complete responses and 26% showing partial responses. The median time to progression was 29 weeks for all evaluable patients and 67, 40, and 28 weeks for complete and partial responders and patients with stable disease, respectively. The median duration of survival was 58 weeks. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, resulting in leukopenia (World Health Organization grades 3 and 4) in 73% of the evaluable patients. Other side effects were rare and usually well manageable.

Purpose: To report five cases of acute monocytic or myelomonocytic leukemia after chemotherapy with 4-epidoxorubicin for breast cancer and to evaluate the risk of leukemia after the use of this drug., Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to either 4-epi-doxorubicin plus cisplatin or 4-epi-doxorubicin alone. An additional 203 patients were treated prospectively with 4-epi-doxorubicin alone. All were observed closely for leukemic complications., Results: Three patients from the randomized study developed leukemia; all were in the subgroup of 74 patients who received 4-epi-doxorubicin plus cisplatin, whereas no leukemia was observed among the remaining 83 patients in the randomized study or among the additional 203 patients who were treated prospectively with 4-epi-doxorubicin alone (P = .023, log-rank test). In the subgroup of 74 patients who were treated with 4-epi-doxorubicin plus cisplatin, the cumulative risk of leukemia was 16.0% +/- 9.9% (mean +/- SE) 33 months after the start of therapy; the relative risk was 668 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 138 to 1,953). Two other cases of acute monocytic and myelomonocytic leukemia were observed after 4-epi-doxorubicin plus alkylating agents were administered for breast cancer. Three of five cases of leukemia presented balanced translocations to chromosome band 11q23 and two, loss of a whole chromosome no. 7 or its long arm., Conclusions: 4-epi-doxorubicin is leukemogenic, and the leukemias are often acute monocytic or myelomonocytic with balanced chromosome translocations to band 11q23, such as in the leukemias after therapy with the epipodophyllotoxins. Furthermore, our results suggest a synergistic effect in leukemogenesis between 4-epi-doxorubicin targeting DNA-topoisomerase II and directly genotoxic drugs such as cisplatin or alkylating agents.

The outcome of two different alternating regimens of chemotherapy was investigated in a prospective controlled trial in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both regimens comprised cyclophosphamide, lomustine, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin and etoposide administered in different schedules. The investigative regimen (B) included simultaneous administration of cyclophosphamide + lomustine alternating with cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin, and with doxorubicin + lomustine. The hypothetical superiority of this regimen was based on data from experimental animal tumors suggesting potentiated efficacy of the three specific combinations. A total of 234 patients were included, and 113 vs 108 patients were eligible. Median survival in both groups was 48 weeks (p = 0.89). Complete remissions were observed in 36/101 and in 42/99 patients evaluable for response. There was no significant difference in response duration. At restaging after 18 months of chemotherapy 27 patients (16%) and 22 patients (16%), respectively, were free of disease. Six patients, three in each arm, are still alive, 8+ to 10.5+ years after diagnosis. Scheduled doses of the six agents were the same in the two regimens except for a 30% reduction of every second dose of cyclophosphamide in regimen B. Nevertheless, regimen B resulted in significantly more leukopenic patients, septicemic episodes, and blood transfusions, and the dosage of etoposide was more often reduced in arm B than in arm A. The increased toxicity was not associated with improved treatment results.

One hundred thirty-three evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer entered a randomized trial comparing epirubicin 60 mg/m2 with a combination of epirubicin 45 mg/m2 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. In all 10 premenopausal women an oophorectomy was performed. Seventy-five patients had previously received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for advanced disease and 68 had received adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide or CMF). Among evaluable patients (72 in the epirubicin group and 61 in the epirubicin + vindesine group) response rates were as follows: complete response--seven versus six; partial response--31 versus 22; no change--16 versus 17 (p greater than 0.40). Median time to disease progression was 6 months in both groups and median survival times were identical (12 months). Thrombocytopenia was less frequent in the epirubicin + vindesine group (p less than 0.01). In the epirubicin + vindesine group, mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy was observed in 40% of the patients. Congestive heart failure developed in one patient with a cumulative dose of epirubicin less than 1000 mg/m2 and in 7 of 15 patients who had greater than 1000 mg/m2. Four died of this cause. In conclusion, epirubicin is effective as a single agent for advanced breast cancer. The combination with vindesine does not increase its efficacy.

The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the therapeutic activity and toxicity of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in previously untreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Treatment was doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed by a 24 h infusion of ifosfamide 5 g/m2 plus mesna 2.5 g/m2 repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Of 203 patients entered, 175 were evaluable for response. The response rate was 35% (95% CI 28-42%), with 9% of the patients achieving a complete remission and 26% a partial remission. The median time to progression was 29 weeks for all evaluable patients, and 67, 40 and 28 weeks for complete and partial responders and patients with stable disease, respectively. The median duration of survival was 58 weeks. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, resulting in leukopenia (WHO grade 3 and 4) in 73% of evaluable treatment courses. Other side-effects were rare and usually well manageable.

In a prospective study the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), systolic blood pressure, ECG, and heart rate were recorded at rest and during submaximal work to compare the cardiotoxic effect of epirubicin with a combination chemotherapy without known cardiotoxicity. A total of 14 females with advanced breast cancer were treated with epirubicin at a median cumulative dose of 827 mg/m2 (range, 550-1244). These patients had previously received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or cyclophosphamide alone as adjuvant treatment, or CMF for advanced disease. The control group consisted of 11 females with advanced breast cancer given CMF only. The systolic blood pressure at rest as well as during submaximal work was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) after treatment in the epirubicin group than in the CMF controls. With regard to LVEF, the median value of 54% at rest was significantly lower after treatment in the epirubicin group than in the controls (59%). There was a significant fall in LVEF at rest and during exercise in the epirubicin group, whereas no such changes were found in the CMF controls after treatment. The RVEF was unaffected. In the epirubicin-treated group one patient developed fatal congestive heart failure, and in the remaining 13 patients treatment was discontinued due to progression of the cancer and not to cardiotoxicity. Thus, the cardiotoxicity of epirubicin changed the clinical outcome in only 1 of 14 patients with advanced breast cancer.

This prospective randomized trial, conducted by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, is the largest study, so far, of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer. The trial is unique in that it is nationwide and based on a nonselected population of patients, and is the only adjuvant trial studying the effect of cyclophosphamide monotherapy. After total mastectomy with axillary node sampling, followed by local radiotherapy, 1,032 pre- and perimenopausal women with operable breast cancer were randomized to observation alone, or to adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year with either cyclophosphamide monotherapy or with a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). As of January 1987, median follow-up was 68 months. From early on both cyclophosphamide alone and CMF were found to improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) significantly and to a similar degree (P = .0001). However, an overall survival advantage did not become evident until 5 years after the start of treatment. So far, this advantage appears to be more pronounced in CMF (P = .0065) than in cyclophosphamide-only patients (P = .08). Thus, the study confirms the findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) and Milan trials that adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs the survival of premenopausal women with early breast cancer. A retrospective analysis revealed that, in contrast with CMF, cyclophosphamide alone did not improve RFS significantly in subsets of patients without amenorrhea, with estrogen-receptor (ER) negative tumors, and with tumors of low histological differentiation. Assuming that cyclophosphamide alone is a less tumoricidal treatment than CMF, these findings suggest that the effect of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy is mediated partly through chemical castration, and partly through a purely cytotoxic effect.

The therapeutic efficacy of combined endocrine therapy with tamoxifen, aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone (T+AG+H) was evaluated against treatment with tamoxifen (T) alone in 210 patients above 65 years of age with metastatic breast cancer. The treatment results have been assessed for the 166 fully evaluable patients and were the following for the T and T+AG+H groups, respectively: PD: 31 and 35%; NC: 35 and 37%; PR: 13 and 16%; and CR: 21 and 12%. The overall treatment results are not statistically different (p = 0.35) and the 95% C.L. of the difference of the response rates are -8% to +20%. The median duration of remission was approximately 24 months in both treatment groups (p = 0.31). The time to treatment failure was comparable with median values of 10 and 8 months in the T and the T+AG+H groups respectively (p = 0.17). Toxicity was more frequent and severe in the combined treatment group and could in most instances be attributed to treatment with AG+H. In conclusion, the simultaneous use of T and AG and H does not seem to improve the therapeutic results in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer.

Prednimustine is an ester of chlorambucil and prednisolone. The drug has had some activity in experimental as well as in human tumors, including breast cancer. The objective of the current study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and toxicity of prednimustine with its components of chlorambucil plus prednisolone, and to compare the clinical effectiveness and toxicity of a continuous treatment with an intermittent one. Two hundred and one patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to the following treatments: I: prednimustine continuously; 40 mg/m2 d; II: prednimustine intermittently, 160 mg/m2 d 1 to 5, repeated every three weeks; and III: chlorambucil 8 mg/m2 d plus prednisolone 8 mg/m2 d, both given continuously. All treatments were given orally. One hundred and ninety five patients were evaluable for assessment of response to the treatments. The response rates were 21% in both of the prednimustine-treated groups, whereas only 11% of the patients treated with chlorambucil and prednisolone responded. The duration of remission with continuous prednimustine was longer than with the other two treatment groups, but not significantly so. One hundred and ninety five patients were evaluable for assessment of hematologic toxicity. No differences were observed between the two prednimustine-treated groups, whereas the group treated with chlorambucil plus prednisolone experienced a significantly higher degree of leukopenia and/or thrombopenia. Subjective toxicities, nausea, vomiting and psychical symptoms were only moderate in the three treatment groups, but significantly more pronounced in the group treated with intermittent prednimustine. Because of these promising results, prednimustine should be compared to other alkylating agents in patients with advanced breast cancer in randomized trials.

In a 2-year period, 146 patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung, staged as having extensive disease, were randomized to receive either continuous chemotherapy consisting of (a) 1-(2-chloroethyl-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and vincristine followed by (b) 4'-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-[4,6-O-(R) ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside] and doxorubicin at progression of disease or a regimen of (a) alternating with (b). Seventy-six patients received the continuous regimen; 70 patients received alternating treatment. Response rates were 68 and 72%, respectively. The median duration of response was 16 weeks in patients receiving continuous treatment compared to 28 weeks in patients receiving alternating treatment (p less than 0.05). No survival time difference was observed between the groups, median survival being 36 and 38 weeks, respectively. Four patients became long-term survivors (5.6 +, 5.5 +, 5.1, and 4.7 + years). All received alternating therapy. Six toxic deaths were observed among patients receiving continuous therapy compared to only one death among those in the alternating regimen. In conclusion, alternating combination chemotherapy leads to prolonged duration of remission. Duration of survival is not prolonged in uncured patients, but an increased possibility of long-term disease-free survival cannot be precluded.

Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with extensive small-cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were entered into a three-arm prospective randomized trial. The purpose was both to compare etoposide with methotrexate (MTX) in a combination chemotherapy regimen otherwise consisting of vincristine (VCR), lomustine (CCNU), and cyclophosphamide (CTX) and to evaluate a treatment design based on cell kinetic observations suggesting enhanced sensitivity to etoposide three to six days after administration of VCR, CCNU, and CTX. In all three treatment arms, VCR, CCNU, and CTX were administered on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. In arm A, MTX was administered on days 14 and 17, while in arm B, MTX was replaced by etoposide administered on days 14 through 17. In arm C, MTX was also replaced by etoposide, but administered on days 3 through 6. Overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with "early" etoposide (arm C; median, 33 weeks) as compared with arm A (MTX; median, 23 weeks) (P less than .05), but not statistically different from "late" etoposide administration (arm B; median, 27 weeks). However, for patients with initial favorable performance status (0 + 1), a significantly longer survival was obtained for those treated with early etoposide (arm C. median, 51 weeks) as compared with patients in arm A (median, 32 weeks) and arm B (median, 36 weeks) (P less than .05). Two-year survival was obtained in six patients (7%) in arm C compared with three patients (3%) in arm B and none in arm A. The study confirmed that etoposide is an active drug in the treatment of SCCL and when combined with CTX, CCNU, and VCR, the cell kinetic approach of an early administration yields the best results.

Mortality and morbidity was investigated in a consecutive series of 72 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who were found to be disease-free at restaging after 18 months of treatment. These patients were all the long-term survivors among 874 patients included in one of six trials between 1973 and 1981. All studies used combination chemotherapy with or without irradiation. Follow-up of the patients varied between 4 and 11 years. The estimated 5-year survival rate subsequent to discontinuation of therapy was 0.24, corresponding to a death rate of 0.25 per year or ten times greater than the expected mortality for persons of the same age group. This high mortality was primarily related to recurrent SCLC, the estimated cumulative risk of relapse reaching 46% at the time of the latest recurrence 5 years from diagnosis. The risk of relapse was generally independent of the pretreatment disease stage although it was reduced in patients with resectable disease and was greater in those with pretreatment liver or bone marrow metastases. Equal risks of relapse were related to the use of regimens with and without radiotherapy. The cumulative risk of relapse in patients surviving 3 years from initiation of the treatment was less than 15% and accordingly, 3 years of follow-up seems sufficient for comparison of long-term results obtained in different trials. The second factor resulting in death or disease was second cancer, for which the cumulated risk increased to 32%, the latest occurring 5.4 years from the diagnosis of SCLC. Five of these cases were non-small-cell lung cancers and three were secondary leukemias. The estimated mortality related to non-neoplastic conditions was just significantly greater than expected. In spite of the increased mortality in this series, 38 of 54 2-year disease-free survivors and 20 of 22 5-year survivors resumed a lifestyle similar to that before diagnosis of SCLC.

Two hundred seventy-nine patients with previously untreated nonresectable adenocarcinoma of the lung (ACL) entered a prospective randomized trial, comparing vindesine (VDS) to a combination of lomustine (CCNU), cyclophosphamide (CTX), and methotrexate (MTX), and to a regimen including all four drugs. Response assessment was possible in 218 patients, while 259 were evaluable for survival. Response rates were similar (22%, 23%, and 27%, respectively) as were median durations of response (15 weeks overall) and survival (29 weeks overall). Patients with dose-limiting toxicity had significantly higher response rate and longer survival than patients without toxicity. The major toxicity was peripheral neuropathy with VDS treatment and myelosuppression with the other two regimens. The VDS single-agent activity in ACL was confirmed, but addition of VDS to the three-drug regimen did not increase activity. Future studies of VDS in combination with other active agents, and comparison to a matched control group on supportive care, are indicated.

From 1977 until 1980, 179 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stages IIB, III or IV ovarian adenocarcinoma were randomized in a two-armed clinical trial: dihydroxybusulfan (B) 600 mg/m2 p.o. for 4-6 weeks q 12 weeks or cyclophosphamide (C) 150 mg/m2 p.o. for 7 days q 4 weeks vs a combination of cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 i.v., doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 i.v., days 1 and 8 q 4 weeks (CAF). In addition, stage IIB patients were randomised to +/- pelvic irradiation. The patients were stratified according to anatomic stage. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to performance status, age and histology. Twenty-three patients were excluded because of protocol violation, leaving 156 patients evaluable for survival with an observation period of 3-6 yr. Twenty patients were in stage IIB, while the remaining 136 patients were classified as stages III and IV. No statistically significant difference was found in survival or response between the two single agents. The overall median response rate (single drug: 27%; CAF: 47%) and the median response duration (single drug: 5 months; CAF: 10 months) were significantly superior for the CAF group compared to the single agent group. No statistical difference in median survival was observed between single-drug treatment (12 months) and CAF (14 months), despite the fact that responders lived significantly longer than nonresponders (17 vs 10 months). In stage IIB patients receiving chemotherapy no benefit of pelvic irradiation was found. Thirty patients (19%) underwent second-look laparotomy, with 15 (50%) being completely free of disease. So far only one patient (7%) has relapsed. Two additional patients, who had microscopic disease removed at second-look laparotomy, seem to have been rescued by this procedure.