Search

Background: Less than 3% of older patients with cancer are enrolled in clinical trials. To reverse this underrepresentation, we compared older patients enrolled with older-patient-specific trials, defined as those designed for older patients with cancer, with those enrolled in age-unspecified trials., Materials and Methods: We focused on individual patient data from those ≥65 years (younger patients excluded) and included all Alliance phase III adjuvant breast cancer trials from 1985-2012., Results: Among 2,277 patients, 1,014 had been enrolled to older-patient-specific and 1,263 to age-unspecified trials. The median age (range) in the older-patient-specific trials was 72 (65-89) years compared with 68 (65-84) years in the cohort of older patients in age-unspecified trials; p < .0001. A greater percentage of patients 75 years or older had enrolled in older-patient-specific trials compared with the cohort of age-unspecified trials: 26% versus 6% ( p < .0001). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-13.7) and 13.5 years (95% CI, 12.9-14.1) for older-patient-specific and age-unspecified trials, respectively. OS was comparable (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.28; p = .34; referent: age-unspecified trials), after adjusting for age, estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and lymph node status. Similar findings were reached for recurrence-free survival. A lower rate of grade 3-5 adverse events (hematologic and nonhematologic) was reported in older-patient-specific trials (43% vs. 58%; p < .0001). Sensitivity analysis with chemotherapy only trials and subset analysis, adjusted for performance score, yielded similar OS results., Conclusion: Older-patient-specific trials appear to address this underrepresentation of older patients with ostensibly comparable outcomes. Clinical trial identification numbers . NCT00003088 (CALGB 9741); NCT00024102 (CALGB 49907); NCT00068601 (CALGB 40401); NCT00005970 (NCCTG N9831) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work underscores the importance of clinical trials that focus on the recruitment of older patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Purpose: A few previous studies report a direct relationship between older age and chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. This study further evaluated this adverse event's age-based risk., Methods: CALGB 40101 investigated adjuvant paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 once per week or 175 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks) in patients with breast cancer and served as a platform for the current study that investigated age-based differences in neuropathy. Grade 2 or worse neuropathy, as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4, was the primary endpoint; patients were assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually for 15 years., Results: Among these 1,881 patients, 230 were 65 years of age or older, 556 were 55-64 years, and 1,095 were younger than 55; 1,226 neuropathy events (commonly grade 1 or 2) were reported in 65% of the cohort. The number of grade 2 or worse events was 63 (27%), 155 (28%), and 266 (24%) within respective age groups ( p = .14). In univariate analysis, only motor neuropathy had a higher age-based incidence: 19 (8%), 43 (8%), and 60 (5%), respectively ( p = .04); in multivariate analyses, this association was no longer statistically significant. Other endpoints, such as time to onset of neuropathy (time from trial enrollment to neuropathy development) and time to improvement (time from maximal grade sensory neuropathy to a one-category improvement), showed no statistically significant age-based differences. In contrast, obesity was associated with neuropathy, and every 2-week paclitaxel was associated with trends toward neuropathy., Conclusion: Although paclitaxel-induced neuropathy is common, older age is not an independent risk factor. Clinical trial identification number . NCT00041119 (CALGB 40101)., Implications for Practice: Age alone is not an independent risk factor for paclitaxel-induced neuropathy., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2018.)

Objective: This study sought to define the role of first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: We analyzed three first-line NSCLC trials: CALGB 9730, CALGB 30203, and CALGB 30801, which tested carboplatin and paclitaxel; carboplatin and gemcitabine; and carboplatin with either pemetrexed or gemcitabine, respectively. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Age-based comparisons with a cutpoint of 65 years were performed with Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for sex, tumor histology, cancer stage, chemotherapy, and smoking history and after stratifying by performance score. Secondary endpoints were grade 3-5 adverse events, chemotherapy cycles completed, and whether toxicity prompted chemotherapy discontinuation., Results: 730 patients were included; 337 (46%) were 65+ years of age. No statistically significant difference in survival was observed for older (≥65) versus younger patients (HR = 1.096; 95% CI = (0.94, 1.28); p = 0.25). A trend emerged with increased odds of a grade 3-5 adverse event for patients ≥65 years versus <65 years (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = (0.99, 2.31); p = 0.05). The proportion of completed chemotherapy cycles was marginally lower in older patients (difference = -5%; 95% CI = (-9, 0.2); p = 0.06) for those ≥65 years versus <65 years, but no statistically significant difference occurred in the rate of chemotherapy discontinuation for toxicity (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = (0.85, 2.19); p = 0.21) for patients ≥65 years versus <65 years. A cutpoint of 70 years yielded similar results., Conclusion: These findings support carboplatin doublet-based chemotherapy in select older patients with advanced NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) is the interval from chemotherapy initiation to premature discontinuation. We evaluated TTF based on age., Methods: Pooled analyses were conducted with first-line chemotherapy trials for advanced NSCLC (CALGB 9730, 30203, and 30801). Comparisons among patients who were 65 years and older and 70 years and older were performed for TTF (primary endpoint), reasons for early chemotherapy cessation, grade 3+ adverse events, and overall survival., Results: Among 1006 patients, 460 (46%) were older than 65 years of age. One hundred forty-five older patients (32% of this age cohort) completed all six planned chemotherapy cycles as did 170 (32%) younger patients. Median TTF was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval: 2.7- 3.2) in older patients and 3 months (95% confidence interval: 2.9-3.5) in younger patients; adjustment for performance status and stratification by chemotherapy by trial yielded no statistically significant age-based difference in TTF. However, reasons for early chemotherapy cessation differed between age groups (multivariate p = 0.004). Older patients were less likely to discontinue from cancer progression (41% versus 55%) and more likely from toxicity or patient choice (16% and 15%, respectively) compared to younger patients (13% and 6%, respectively). Older patients were more likely to experience grade 3+ adverse events (86% versus 79%) with no statistically significant difference in survival. An age cutpoint of 70+ years showed no difference in TTF, a lower trend of early cessation due to cancer progression, and somewhat shorter older patient survival., Conclusions: TTF was comparable between older and younger patients; but different, age-based, and potentially modifiable reasons account for it., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a common management strategy for select patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis, but no trials have documented improved overall survival., Methods: Eighty-nine patients with biopsy-proven immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis were allowed to select treatment with melphalan plus dexamethasone (n = 34) or SCT (n = 55); all patients were transplant eligible. Treatment preference resulted in imbalanced study arms. Patients who selected SCT were younger, more frequently had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score less than 2, had lower-stage amyloidosis, and had a lower incidence of cardiac amyloidosis., Results: Patients receiving melphalan plus dexamethasone had a 3-year progression-free survival rate of 29.1% and an overall survival rate of 58.8%. Patients undergoing SCT had a 3-year progression-free survival rate of 51.7% and an overall survival rate of 83.6%. An attempt to match patients between the 2 arms in terms of risk produced 24 matched triplet sets (2 SCT patients for each melphalan-dexamethasone patient); there was no difference in hematologic response, but there was better survival after autologous SCT. A propensity score-matched analysis of the cohorts (melphalan plus dexamethasone vs SCT) showed an overall mortality hazard ratio of 2.56 (P < .01)., Conclusions: Although the study had limitations, similar hematologic responses and improved survival were observed after SCT versus melphalan plus dexamethasone. Cancer 2016;122:2197-205. © 2016 American Cancer Society., (© 2016 American Cancer Society.)