Search

Purpose: To determine the long-term impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, when prospectively compared by random allocation with standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive (N+) breast cancer patients., Patients and Methods: Two hundred forty-nine patients with N+ breast cancer, recruited from eight French cancer centers, were randomized to receive 12 monthly cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, either CMF (n = 112) or doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil (AVCF) (n = 136). All had a negative metastatic work-up before inclusion, which was stratified by accrual center, tumor stage (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]), and menopausal status., Results: No severe adverse effect related to grade 4 (World Health Organization [WHO]) toxicity was observed. There was no difference in second primary tumor incidence between the two arms. The treatment given was 88% of planned for AVCF and 75% for CMF in both premenopausal and menopausal patients. With a median follow-up time of 16 years (range, 13 to 17), the OS and DFS rates are significantly longer in the AVCF arm (56% v 41% [P = .01] for OS, and 53% v 36% [P = .006] for DFS). These differences are significant, irrespective of tumor stage (T1 to T2 v T3 to T4), and remain positive in patients with or without postoperative locoregional radiotherapy (55% of cohort). When analyzed according to menopausal status, the differences remain significant only for premenopausal patients., Conclusion: This set of mature controlled data confirms the added value of anthracycline-based combination adjuvant therapy for N+ breast cancer patients when compared with CMF, with both regimens given for 1 year.

0.5 mg tetracosactrin is considered to be equivalent to 40 mg methylprednisolone with regard to the induced cortisol secretion. 97 female breast cancer patients who received their first two FEC courses (epirubicin 50-75 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) entered this randomised crossover study (76 had previously received an adjuvant treatment); tetracosactrin was administered intramuscularly and methylprednisolone intravenously immediately before chemotherapy administration. The tolerability was evaluated using a diary card during 5 days and patients were asked for their preference at the end of the two cycles. There was no difference either for vomiting (dry heaves were included) or nausea between the two treatments (the analysis was performed on day 1, the worse day of days 2 and 3 and the worse day of days 4 and 5). At day 1, 49% of the patients experienced no or mild nausea after tetracosactrin and 62% after methylprednisolone (not significant) (first period analysis); a complete control of vomiting (including dry heaves) was observed in 49% of the patients after tetracosactrin and 53% after methylprednisolone (not significant). No difference was observed between patients with or without previous chemotherapy. However, slightly more patients preferred tetracosactrin (P = 0.048).

Seventy-five breast cancer patients scheduled to receive a first course (in a new cycle) of cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (FAC) or epirubicin (FEC) participated in a double-blind crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032), a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, and metoclopramide. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg loading dose (4 mg intravenously [IV] plus 4 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 8 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. Metoclopramide was given as an 80 mg loading dose (60 mg IV plus 20 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 20 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. A "period" interaction in the analysis of emetic response in the first 24 hours necessitated a parallel group analysis of first treatments only, 68 patients being assessable for this parameter. In the first 24 hours, complete or major control (zero to two emetic episodes) of emesis was achieved in 30 of 35 (86%) patients receiving ondansetron and in 14 of 33 (42%) patients receiving metoclopramide (P less than .001). Ondansetron was also more effective in reducing acute nausea. On days 2 to 3, the complete or major responses were significantly better with ondansetron (81% v 65%; P = .033), but there was no statistical difference in the control of nausea. There was a significant patient preference for ondansetron (63% v 26%; P = .001). Extrapyramidal reactions were observed in two metoclopramide treatments; both treatments were otherwise well tolerated. These results are consistent with serotonin (5-HT), being a significant neurotransmitter of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin- or epirubicin/fluorouracil-induced emesis.

One hundred and thirteen patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck were entered into a multicenter trial. Median age was 54 yr (range: 33-74 yr). Median Karnofsky index was 70 (60-100). Thirty-five patients had had prior induction chemotherapy. The first schedule was carboplatin 300 mg/m2, dl and fluoro-uracil 1000 mg/m2/d administered in continuous IV infusion for 96 h every 4 weeks (group 1). The second schedule was carboplatin 350 mg/m2, dl and fluoro-uracil administered at the same dose every 3 weeks (group II). Median number of cycles was 3 (range: 1-16). Seven patients were not eligible. The response rate was 26% (95% confidence limits: 18-34). Nine patients had a complete response. The median duration of response was 6 months (2-16+). The response rates in the 2 groups were not statistically different (21 and 31%) but disease progression was more frequent in group I (61%) than in group II patients (25%). Six early deaths occurred, without sign of drug toxicity. Grade 2 hematological toxicity between or before any cycle was more frequent in group II patients, in particular for leucopenia (13 vs 42%, P less than 0.05). One death was related to granulopenia. Grade 2 or 3 gastric toxicity was observed in 43 patients. No other major toxicity was observed. In our study, combination therapy with carboplatin and fluoro-uracil was found to be moderately active but myelotoxic.

Thirty patients with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anthracycline and 5 fluorouracil in bolus administration, were evaluated with a chemotherapy regimen generally used in head and neck cancer. Treatment schedule consisted of: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on d 1 and 5 fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 continuous infusion on d 2-3-4-5 every 21 d. With all measurable lesions and 27 evaluable patients, the response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval: 12-47%), with 5 complete responses (3 soft tissue - 2 lung) and 3 partial responses (1 lung - 2 liver). The median duration of response is 4.5 months (range 2-11 months). The 30 patients (93 courses) are evaluable for toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was mild: anemia 68% grade 0, neutropenia 68% grade 0 and thrombocytopenia 83% grade 0. Nausea and vomiting were severe 83% grade 3 + 4 at d 1. Others side effects were mild including 5/91 mucositis grade 2 + 3, peripheral neuropathy 1/31 grade 2 and 2/91 reversible rise in serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl.

50 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with the combination of Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 IV day 2, 5-Fluorouracil 400mg/m2 IV and Cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2 IV day 3, 4, 5, 6 of each monthly cycle. 49 patients are evaluable for toxicity and 47 for efficacy after three months of treatment. Hematologic toxicity was substantial and dose-limiting, with one toxic death early in the trial. Other toxicities were moderate and manageable in this short-term study. The response rate after three cycles was 53% +/- 14% with 4 complete remissions, 21 partial remissions, 16 stable disease and 6 progressions. Using the fixed response rate hypothesis of Gehan generalised by Lee and Wesley, with an expected response rate of 60% consistent with the reported response rate of advanced breast cancer to Adriamycin containing regimens, we conclude that the combination studied is not less efficient for the induction of remissions in advanced breast cancer than comparable combinations with Adriamycin. As there is now substantial experimental and clinical evidence of reduced toxicity, mainly on the cardiac muscle, of Mitoxantrone as compared to Adriamycin, we feel that the routine substitution of the latter by the former in chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer is justifiable.

Adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with AVCF gave significantly longer disease-free survival than CMF in the group of patients taken as a whole, in the subgroup with lymph node involvement and in the premenopausal subgroup. No significant difference was found regarding overall survival.