Search

Background: Osimertinib is now a standard treatment for patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We here investigated whether the combination of osimertinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy might hold additive efficacy, as well as tolerability., Patients and Methods: We conducted an open-label randomised phase 2 study to evaluate osimertinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed combination in comparison with osimertinib monotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients who experienced disease progression associated with the emergence of the T790M resistance mutation of EGFR during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, with secondary endpoints, including OS, response, and safety. Given that osimertinib was approved as a first-line treatment during the study, patient accrual was discontinued, and a final analysis was performed for the 62 enrolled patients., Results: Median PFS was 15.8 months for the osimertinib monotherapy group and 14.6 months for the combination therapy group (hazard ratio of 1.09, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.51-2.32; P = .83). Median OS was not reached in either group. The overall response rate was 71.4% in the osimertinib monotherapy group and 53.6% in the combination group. The frequency or severity of known adverse events in the combination group was comparable to those with carboplatin and pemetrexed previously reported, and novel adverse events were not observed in this study., Conclusion: This is the first randomised study to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of osimertinib and cytotoxic chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The addition of chemotherapy to osimertinib as a second-line treatment did not prolong survival, while it was found to be generally tolerable. This combination strategy will be further validated in the first-line setting., Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) identifier: jRCTs071180062., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Dr Tanaka has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Novartis and Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr Asahina has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology outside the submitted work. Dr Kishimoto has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr Miyata has no conflict of interest disclosures. Dr Uchida has no conflict of interest disclosures. Dr Watanabe has no conflict of interest disclosures. Dr Hamai has no conflict of interest disclosures. Dr Harada had no conflict of interest disclosures. Dr Tsubata has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai Pharmaceutical and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr. Sugawara AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Yakult. Dr Kobayashi has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Dr Sugio has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology. Dr Oizumi has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca; personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan KK; grants from Abbvie, Ono Pharmaceutical, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. Dr Okamoto has received grants and personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Chugai Pharmaceutical; grants from Astellas Pharma, Novartis and AbbVie; and personal fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is now a standard treatment of previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, disease progression occurs within 19 months of treatment. In the NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus carboplatin plus pemetrexed demonstrated significantly better progression-free and overall survival compared with gefitinib monotherapy. Furthermore, the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu and North East Japan Study Group, major clinical trial groups in Japan, conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line osimertinib plus carboplatin plus pemetrexed versus osimertinib monotherapy for patients with disease progression during first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and the EGFR T790M resistance mutation (TAKUMI trial; trial registration no., jRCTs071180062). In the first treatment course for the initial 24 patients, no safety issues were reported in the combination arm. Thus, we have planned this phase II study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of osimertinib plus cisplatin/carboplatin plus pemetrexed therapy for patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC., Patients and Methods: A total of 66 patients will be enrolled, because this sample size will be adequate for assessing treatment safety and efficacy. The co-primary endpoints include safety and the objective response rate, and the secondary endpoints include the complete response rate, disease control rate, and progression-free survival., Conclusions: This is the first study to explore the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Our findings could provide valuable information for phase III studies such as FLAURA2 and for developing treatment strategies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of platinum plus gemcitabine (P/G) combinations as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Patients with postoperative stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP arm) or carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GC arm) every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses., Results: A total of 102 patients were randomized (stage IB, 22%; II, 36%; IIIA, 42%; histology: 74% adenocarcinoma). Of the 51 patients in each arm, 37 (73%) completed 4 cycles. During follow-up (median 5.8 years; range 0.1-9.7 years), estimated DFS and OS rates at 2 years were 59.6% and 86.3% with GP and 68.0% and 86.3% with GC, respectively. No significant difference in DFS was noted between arms (P = 0.163), although 3-, 4-, and 5-year DFS rates were higher with GC. Hematological toxic effects were comparable and non-hematological toxic effects were infrequent. DFS was significantly higher in the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1)-low group than in the ERCC1-high group for the GP arm (P = 0.045)., Conclusion: Both P/G combination regimens were feasible and well-tolerated, and thus may represent valid options for postoperative adjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Although no significant differences in DFS were evident between regimens, the present data favor the adoption of GC for further evaluation., Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR ( https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ) identifier: UMIN000000913.

Objectives: Patients with concomitant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are excluded from most clinical chemotherapy trials because of the high risk of exacerbating the latter condition. This study prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with carboplatin in patients with both advanced NSCLC and ILD., Patients and Methods: The enrolled patients had treatment-naïve, advanced NSCLC with ILD. Patients received 100 mg/m 2 nab-paclitaxel weekly and carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 once every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled between April 2014 and September 2017. Sixteen patients (44.4%) had adenocarcinoma, 15 (41.7%) had squamous cell carcinoma (Sq), and 5 (13.9%) had non-small cell carcinoma. The median number of cycles administered were 4 (range: 1-6). The ORR was 55.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.6-70.5). The median PFS and OS were 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.2) and 15.4 months (95% CI: 9.4-18.7), respectively. A greater proportion of patients with Sq experienced improvements than did those with non-Sq: ORRs, 66.7% (95% CI: 41.7-84.8) vs. 47.6% (95% CI: 28.3-67.6) (P = 0.254); median PFS, 8.2 months (95% CI: 4.0-10.2) vs. 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.3-5.4) (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.30-1.20]; P = 0.15); and median OS, 16.8 months (95% CI: 9.8-not reached) vs. 11.9 months (95% CI: 7.3-17.4) (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.24-1.28]; P = 0.17). Two patients (5.6%) experienced grade ≥2 pneumonitis and 1 patient (2.8%) died., Conclusion: Weekly nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatin showed favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity in patients with both advanced NSCLC and ILD., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Regulatory T cells (Tregs) expressing CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) can suppress antitumor immune responses and are associated with poor prognoses in several cancers. We assessed the safety and efficacy of combined mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4 antibody) and nivolumab [anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody] in immunotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors., Patients and Methods: This study (NCT02476123) comprised dose-escalation (3+3 design) and expansion parts. Patients received nivolumab (3.0 mg/kg) every 2 weeks, with mogamulizumab (0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg in dose escalation, 1.0 mg/kg in expansion) once weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was safety; secondary objectives were antitumor effects, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted., Results: Ninety-six patients were enrolled (July 2015-November 2016): six patients in the dose-escalation part and 90 in the expansion part. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the dose-escalation part. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 29% of patients in the expansion part (no grade 5 TRAEs). The most frequent TRAEs were rash (39%), rash maculopapular (20%), diarrhea (13%), stomatitis (12%), and pruritus (11%). There were four (27%) confirmed tumor responses among 15 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and one confirmed and two unconfirmed responses among 15 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. During treatment, populations of effector Tregs (CD4 + CD45RA - FoxP3 high ) decreased and CD8 + T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes increased., Conclusions: Combining an anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, with a Treg-depleting anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab, provides an acceptable safety profile, antitumor activity, and a potentially effective option in cancer immunotherapy., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switch maintenance erlotinib and bevacizumab after induction therapy with carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with wild-type EGFR., Methods: Enrolled patients had treatment-naïve, advanced non-squamous NSCLC with wild-type EGFR. Carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5.0], pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) were administered on day 1 every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles. Maintenance therapy with erlotinib (150 mg/body) on day 1 through 21 plus bevacizumab on day 1 every 3 weeks was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL)., Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled between September 2011 and June 2014. The median number of cycles for induction and maintenance therapy was 4 (range 1-6) and 4 (range 1-20). Twenty-nine patients (58%) received maintenance therapy. The 6-month PFS rate was 59.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0-72.6%]. The ORR was 48.0% (95% CI 34.8-61.5%), and disease control rate was 86.0% (95% CI 73.8-93.0%). The median PFS and OS were 6.5 months (95% CI 5.8-7.2 months) and 21.4 months (95% CI 15.9-26.9 months), respectively. Although grades ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 33 patients (66.0%), most were hematologic; there was no febrile neutropenia. QOL was maintained throughout treatment., Conclusions: Carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab followed by erlotinib and bevacizumab maintenance showed modest efficacy and was well tolerated in non-squamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR., Trial Registration: UMIN000005872.

Purpose: Amrubicin and re-challenge of platinum doublet are both effective treatments for sensitive-relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, no comparative study of these treatments has been reported. This randomized study was conducted to select the most suitable regimen for future evaluation., Patients and Methods: SCLC patients who had relapsed more than 90 days after their first-line platinum-doublet regimen were randomized to receive amrubicin (40mg/m(2), days 1-3) or re-challenge with platinum doublet. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and toxicity profiles. We assumed that an ORR of 50% indicates potential usefulness, while that of 30% would constitute the lower limit of interest (alpha 0.1; beta 0.1). Initial estimated accrual was 28 patients to each arm., Results: From February 2008 to June 2013, 60 patients were enrolled and 57 patients (27 amrubicin and 30 re-challenge) were found to be evaluable for efficacy and safety. The ORR and PFS were 67% (90% confidence interval, 52-82) and 5.4 months in the amrubicin group, and 43% (90% confidence interval, 28-58) and 5.1 months in the re-challenge group, respectively. Although grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in 19% of patients in the amrubicin group, these episodes were transient and manageable. Non-hematological toxicities were generally moderate and no treatment-related death was observed in either group., Conclusion: Only amrubicin met the primary endpoint. Moreover, amrubicin demonstrated superior efficacy over re-challenge of platinum with acceptable levels of toxicity. Further evaluation of amrubicin for sensitive-relapsed SCLC is warranted., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. However, it is unknown whether second-line platinum-based chemotherapy after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy could lead to better outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy after gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancers harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (the NEJ002 study)., Methods: Seventy-one non-small cell lung cancers, treated with gefitinib as first-line therapy and then receiving platinum-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy were evaluated in NEJ002. Patients were evaluated for antitumor response to second-line chemotherapy by computed tomography according to the criteria of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors group (version 1.0)., Results: Of the 71 patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy after first-line gefitinib, a partial response was documented in 25.4% (18/71), stable disease in 43.7% (31/71) and progression of disease in 21.1% (15/71). The objective response and disease control rates were 25.4% (18/71) and 69% (49/71), respectively. There was no significant difference between first- and second-line chemotherapy in objective response and disease control rates for advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. In the analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types, the objective responses of deletions in exon 19 and a point mutation in exon 21 (L858R) were 27.3% (9/33) and 28.1% (9/32), respectively, but these differences between objective response rates were not significant., Conclusions: The efficacy of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed at progression by gefitinib was similar to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types did not influence the efficacy of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: This phase II study evaluated the response rate (RR) and safety of combination therapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) and pemetrexed (PEM) in Japanese patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC). Further, the relationship between therapy efficacy/toxicity and genetic polymorphisms associated with PEM metabolism was analyzed., Methods: Forty-one patients received CBDCA at a dose targeting an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL × min and PEM of 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the thymidylate synthase (TYMS) coding gene, the variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) in the TYMS, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) coding gene were analyzed., Results: The overall RR was 36.6 %. Median progression-free survival and median survival time were 4.7 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.9-5.6 months] and 16.2 months (95 % CI 6.1-26.2 months), respectively. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations were detected in 6 patients (14.6 %). The VNTR in the TYMS significantly correlated with anemia (p = 0.047) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.038)., Conclusions: This combination therapy was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced non-sq NSCLC. The VNTR in the TYMS appears to be a predictive factor for anemia and thrombocytopenia in patients treated with this regimen.

Background: Amrubicin (AMR), a new anthracycline agent, has shown promising results for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), although the efficacy of AMR alone against refractory relapsed SCLC is insufficient. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of AMR and carboplatin (CBDCA) in patients with refractory relapsed SCLC., Methods: Patients with advanced SCLC who relapsed within 90 days after the completion of first-line chemotherapy received AMR (30mg/m(2), days 1-3) and CBDCA (area under the curve 4.0mgmL(-1)min(-1), day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of this study was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and the toxicity profile. Assuming that an ORR of 45% in eligible patients would indicate potential usefulness and an ORR of 20% would be the lower limit of interest, with α=0.10 and β=0.10, at least 24 patients were required., Results: Among 29 eligible patients, the ORR was 34% (90% confidence interval, 20-48). The median PFS was 3.5 months, whereas the median survival time was 7.3 months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (79%), although only one patient (3%) suffered from febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicities were of moderate severity and no treatment-related death was observed., Conclusions: This is the first prospective study of AMR combined with CBDCA for refractory relapsed SCLC, which was effective and well tolerated. However, further investigation of this regimen is warranted., (Copyright © 2014 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens were collected from advanced NSCLC patients enrolled in LETS phase III trial comparing first-line S-1/carboplatin with paclitaxel/carboplatin and subjected to multiplex genotyping for 214 somatic hotspot mutations in 26 genes (LungCarta Panel) and 20 major variants of ALK, RET, and ROS1 fusion genes (LungFusion Panel) with the Sequenom MassARRAY platform. MET amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A somatic mutation in at least one gene was identified in 48% of non-squamous cell carcinoma and 45% of squamous cell carcinoma specimens, with EGFR (17%), TP53 (11%), STK11 (9.8%), MET (7.6%), and KRAS (6.2%). Mutations in EGFR or KRAS were associated with a longer or shorter median overall survival, respectively. The LungFusion Panel identified ALK fusions in six cases (2.5%), ROS1 fusions in five cases (2.1%), and a RET fusion in one case (0.4%), with these three types of rearrangement being mutually exclusive. Nine (3.9%) of 229 patients were found to be positive for de novo MET amplification. This first multiplex genotyping of NSCLC associated with a phase III trial shows that MassARRAY-based genetic testing for somatic mutations and fusion genes performs well with nucleic acid derived from FFPE specimens of NSCLC tissue.

Introduction: Although paclitaxel with carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy has improved survival for patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal dose of paclitaxel has not been well defined in Japan. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy (thoracic RTRT)., Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were eligible. Before treatment, gold markers were inserted into the lung and the mediastinum of all patients. RTRT comprised a total of 66 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, for 7 weeks. Patients received paclitaxel at a starting dose of 40 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin at a fixed area under the curve (AUC) of 2, as a weekly regimen with RTRT. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 5mg/m(2) per level., Results: Eight patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were enrolled and treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel (40 mg/m(2) and 45 mg/m(2)), carboplatin (AUC=2) and RTRT. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at Level 1 (paclitaxel, 40 mg/m(2) and carboplatin, AUC=2). At Level 2 (paclitaxel, 45 mg/m(2) and carboplatin, AUC=2), two of five patients experienced DLTs, in the form of esophagitis and discontinuation of chemotherapy more than twice. The MTD and RD of paclitaxel were thus defined as 45 mg/m(2) and 40 mg/m(2), respectively., Conclusions: This phase I study was well tolerated and the RD of paclitaxel and carboplatin with RTRT is 40 mg/m(2) at AUC=2, respectively. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Platinum-free regimens can represent an alternative for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) if similar efficacy is provided with better tolerability. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined irinotecan and S-1 for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC., Methods: Chemotherapy consisted of 4-week cycles of intravenous irinotecan (100 mg/m(2), days 1 and 15) and oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2), days 1-14). The primary endpoint was response rate, while secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety., Results: A total of 112 cycles was administered to 40 patients (median 3 cycles; range 1-6 cycles). Twelve patients showed partial response and 17 patients had stable disease, representing a response rate of 30% and a disease control rate of 72.5%. Median survival time and median PFS were 16.1 and 4.8 months, respectively. Hematological toxicities of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (32.5%) and anemia (5.0%). The most common nonhematological toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included diarrhea (15.0%) and anorexia (17.5%). Patients homo- or heterozygous for UGTA1A*6 tended to show a higher incidence of grade 3 diarrhea (p = 0.055)., Conclusion: The combination of irinotecan and S-1 offers good efficacy and tolerability for previously untreated advanced NSCLC., (Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Combination chemotherapy of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and cisplatin is a standard treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, inhibits topoisomerase II. We investigated a sequential triplet chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan and cisplatin followed by amrubicin in patients with extensive-stage SCLC., Methods: Eligible patients were aged 20 to 70 years and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable lesions, and adequate organ functions. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 60 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m on day 1 every 3 weeks for three cycles and then amrubicin 40 mg/m alone on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks for three cycles., Results: From September 2004 to September 2006, 45 patients were enrolled, 43 were evaluable for response and survival, and 44 were evaluable for toxicity. Twenty-eight patients (64%) completed the full planned chemotherapy. One patient achieved complete response and 33 had partial response for an overall response rate of 79%. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months. Median overall survival was 15.4 months. Major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 57%, 7%, 0%, and 7% of patients during irinotecan/cisplatin cycles and in 91%, 27%, 9%, and 15% of patients during amrubicin cycles, respectively., Conclusions: The sequential triplet chemotherapy, irinotecan and cisplatin followed by amrubicin, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Further investigation of this treatment is warranted.

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer with sensitive mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib, but little is known about how its efficacy and safety profile compares with that of standard chemotherapy., Methods: We randomly assigned 230 patients with metastatic, non-small-cell lung cancer and EGFR mutations who had not previously received chemotherapy to receive gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points included overall survival, response rate, and toxic effects., Results: In the planned interim analysis of data for the first 200 patients, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gefitinib group than in the standard-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death or disease progression with gefitinib, 0.36; P<0.001), resulting in early termination of the study. The gefitinib group had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (10.8 months, vs. 5.4 months in the chemotherapy group; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.41; P<0.001), as well as a higher response rate (73.7% vs. 30.7%, P<0.001). The median overall survival was 30.5 months in the gefitinib group and 23.6 months in the chemotherapy group (P=0.31). The most common adverse events in the gefitinib group were rash (71.1%) and elevated aminotransferase levels (55.3%), and in the chemotherapy group, neutropenia (77.0%), anemia (64.6%), appetite loss (56.6%), and sensory neuropathy (54.9%). One patient receiving gefitinib died from interstitial lung disease., Conclusions: First-line gefitinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were selected on the basis of EGFR mutations improved progression-free survival, with acceptable toxicity, as compared with standard chemotherapy. (UMIN-CTR number, C000000376.), (2010 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Background: Combination chemotherapy comprising amrubicin and vinorelbine as a second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully evaluated. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD), the present phase I study examined patients with advanced NSCLC., Methods: The subjects were nine patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, prior platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, and measurable or evaluable lesions. Treatment consisted of five dose levels, with amrubicin 35-45 mg/m2 administered as a 5-min intravenous infusion on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 15-25 mg/m2 given as a 1-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks., Results: All patients had received carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in two of six patients (febrile neutropenia and deep vein thrombosis ) at level 1, allowing us to conduct level 2. At level 2, all three patients experienced DLT (leucopenia > or =4 days in one patient; febrile neutropenia in three patients; and infection in two patients), and this level was determined as the MTD. Subsequently, level 1 (amrubicin 35 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2) was defined as the RD. Responses in the nine patients included a partial response in one patient and stable disease in four patients., Conclusion: As second-line therapy, the RD of the combination of amrubicin and vinorelbine is 35 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2, respectively. Further study should proceed to clarify the efficacy of this regimen.