Search

Background: Glofitamab monotherapy induces durable remission in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more previous therapies, but has not previously been assessed as a second-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of glofitamab plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Methods: The phase 3, randomised, open-label STARGLO trial was done at 62 centres in 13 countries in Asia and Australia, Europe, and North America. We recruited transplant-ineligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous therapies. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks (block size of six) via an interactive voice or web response system (2:1; stratified by 1 vs ≥2 previous lines of therapy and relapsed vs refractory status) to Glofit-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus glofitamab step-up dosing to 30 mg; for a total of eight cycles, plus four additional cycles of glofitamab monotherapy) or R-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus rituximab 375 mg/m 2 ; for a total of eight cycles). The trial independent review committee, which evaluated all response-based endpoints, was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients. We present results from both the primary analysis (cutoff: March 29, 2023) and updated analysis after all patients had completed study therapy (cutoff: Feb 16, 2024). Safety analyses included all patients who received any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04408638, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment)., Findings: From Feb 23, 2021, to March 14, 2023, 274 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive Glofit-GemOx (n=183) or R-GemOx (n=91). 158 (58%) patients were male and 116 (42%) were female; median age was 68 years (IQR 58-74). At the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 11·3 months (95% CI 9·6-12·7), overall survival was significantly improved with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median not estimable [NE; 95% CI 13·8 months-NE] vs 9·0 months [7·3-14·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·59 [95% CI 0·40-0·89]; p=0·011). At the updated analysis after a median follow-up of 20·7 months (19·9-23·3), a consistent improvement in overall survival was observed with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median 25·5 months [18·3-NE] vs 12·9 months [7·9-18·5]; HR 0·62 [0·43-0·88]). In the safety sets, 180 (100%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and 84 (96%) of 88 patients in the R-GemOx group had at least one adverse event during the study period. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 76 (44%) of 172 glofitamab-exposed patients and was predominantly low grade. Deaths related to glofitamab or rituximab occurred in five (3%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and in one (1%) patient in the R-GemOx group., Interpretation: Glofit-GemOx had a significant overall survival benefit compared with R-GemOx, supporting its use in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous lines of therapy., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JSA has received grants or contracts from BMS, Cellectis, Merck, Mustang Bio, Regeneron, and Seagen; consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Cellectar, Caribou Biosciences, Century Therapeutics, Celgene, Epizyme, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech, Gilead, Interius, Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Seagen, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Regeneron. MKu has received grants or contracts and consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche; a grant from BeiGene; and consulting fees from AbbVie. MH has received grants from Janssen and F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, Gilead, and Pfizer; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead. CPF has received grants or contracts from BeiGene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, and AbbVie; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, SOBI, and Takeda; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI. DHY has received grants or contracts from AbbVie, BeiGene, Boryung, Celltrion, Kyowa Kirin, Janssen, Samyang, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Antengene, BMS, Boryung, GSK, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, and Janssen; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio. HA has received grants or contracts from Morphosys, Genentech, Novartis, BMS, Epizyme, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Genentech; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie. WT has received grants or contracts and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, AbbVie, Sobi, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, Gilead, and AbbVie; and is grateful for and acknowledges funding and support from the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre. CH has received grants or contracts from Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JMZ has received consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pierre Fabre, Takeda, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and AbbVie; and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. CYC has received grants or contracts from BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, MSD, and Lilly; consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS. HG has received consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, AbbVie, and Takeda. SS is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from Genentech; and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. VO-N is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. RT is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JR is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MD is an employee of, has provided all support for the present manuscript for, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MKa is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has received grants or contracts from Roche Diagnostics International and F Hoffmann-La Roche. EM is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. HH is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche. LL is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received royalties or licences from, has patents planned, issued or pending with, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. GPG has received grants or contracts from BeiGene and Merck; consulting fees from Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Prelude Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead and F Hoffmann-La Roche; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche and Prelude Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are prototypical epigenetic malignancies with invariably poor prognoses. Novel and effective therapeutic strategies are needed to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in relapsed/refractory patients., Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of azacitidine and chidamide, alone or in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx), in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs (registration number: ChiCTR2000037232). The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate., Findings: As of May 1st, 2024, thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The best overall response rate was 53.3%, meeting its primary endpoint. Among the patients with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL; N = 19), a numerically higher response rate was observed, regardless of whether chemotherapy was combined, compared to patients with non-AITL. After a median follow-up of 36.6 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients with AITL who received combination chemotherapy (N = 12) achieved the most promising response rates (overall response rate, 91.7%; complete remission rate, 66.7%) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival, 17.2 months; median overall survival, 38.8 months). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40.0%) and thrombocytopenia (30.0%)., Conclusions: The combination of epigenetic therapy with GemOx was well tolerated and highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs. Patients with AITL, in particular, may benefit more from this combination treatment and should be the focus of future studies., Funding: This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20232039)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score is the newest prognostic model for patient with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Pathological and radiological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are key factors for prognostic stratification of these patients. The present study aims to evaluate the GAME-score's ability to predict pathological and radiologic responses to NAC., Methods: CRLM patients who underwent liver resection after NAC from January 2010 to December 2021 were categorized by GAME scores: low risk (LR, 0-1), moderate risk (MR, 2-3), and high risk (HR, ≥4). Correlations between groups and radiological/pathological features were analyzed. Poor pathological response was defined as Tumor Regression Grade 4-5., Results: Of 1054 liver resections for CRLMs, 448 were included. GAME scores were LR: 80 (18 %), MR: 228 (51 %), and HR: 140 (31 %). In this cohort, HR-GAME scores were associated with lower pathological response (LR: 67.1 %, MR: 74.9 %, HR: 82.6 %; p = 0.010). Radiologic progression occurred in 10 % of HR patients, significantly more than in LR (3.8 %) and MR (3.5 %) groups (p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis for independent predictors of pathological response confirmed HR-GAME (RR 1.843, p=0.025) along with age higher than 70 years (RR 2.111, p=0.022) and irinotecan-based NAC (RR 3.066, p < 0.001). For radiological progression disease after NAC, the HR-GAME score (RR 2.77, p=0.016) was the only independent predictor. HR-GAME scores were also associated with higher rates of mucinous differentiation (p = 0.021), satellitosis (p = 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.011), and perineural invasion (p = 0.010)., Conclusions: GAME score category should be considered into planning of therapeutic strategy of patients with CRLMs., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC)., Methods: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0., Results: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs., Conclusions: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC)., Methods: Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety., Results: A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported., Conclusion: Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The retrospective study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of GemOx (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin) plus sintilimab (belongs to the class of drugs known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly targeting the PD-1 receptor) in relapse or refractory nodal PTCLs., Methods: Patients with nodal PTCL who initiated salvage therapy with sintilimab and GemOx between January 2020 to September 2021 were identified from the database of the hematology department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. All patients received 2-4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of treatment of sintilimab (200 mg, I.V, D1) in combination with GemOx. Treatment response was assessed every six weeks during the salvage treatment phase. Eligible patients received maintenance therapy according to the investigator's decision. Follow-ups were routinely conducted every three months., Results: 31 patients with r/r nodal PTCLs were enrolled, including 23 PTCL-NOS, 4 AITL, and 4 ALCL. 21 (67.7%) patients received at least two lines of therapy. 71.0% (95% CI, 53.4%-83.9%) of patients documented objective response of 2-4 cycles of sintilimab plus GemOx therapy, including 9 complete response and 13 partial response. 21 (67.7%) patients received consolidation therapy, including 5 autologous stem-cell transplantation and 12 histone deacetylase inhibitors. After a median 25.6 months follow-up, the median PFS was 22.0 (95% CI,11.8-24.7) months, and the median OS was 26.2 (95% CI, 24.4 -NA) months. 29 (93.5%) patients experienced at least one adverse event, and 26 (83.9% patients only had mild (grade 1-2) AEs.Univariable Cox regression showed the progression risk of AITL is 22.7 (3.9- 131.0, p < 0.01) times of PTCL-NOS, while the HR of ALCL was 1.14 (0.33-3.96,p = 0.833)., Conclusion: Sintilimab plus GemOx showed encouraging activity and manageable toxicity for patients with r/r PTCL., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC)., Methods: From 2005 to 2016, a total of 408 LA-NPC patients treated with GP or TPF sequential chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively included. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline variables. Survival outcomes and acute toxicities were compared between both groups., Results: A total of 230 patients were selected by 1:1 PSM. At a median follow-up of 91 months, no significant differences were observed between the matched GP and TPF groups regarding 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregionally relapse-free survival (83.4% vs. 83.4%, P = 0.796; 75.6% vs. 68.6%, P = 0.301; 86.7% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.096; and 87.4% vs. 87.2%, P = 0.721). Notable disparities in adverse effects were identified, with higher incidences of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in the GP group while grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia in the TPF group. Though not recorded in our cohort, combined with the FAERS database, thrombotic adverse reactions are a concern for the GP regimen, while the TPF regimen requires vigilance for life-threatening adverse reactions such as septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and laryngeal edema., Conclusion: No significant difference in long-term outcomes was observed between the GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens for LA-NPC. Differences in adverse effects should be noted when choosing the regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery., Patients and Methods: OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into the mesocolic fat ≥5 mm or T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population., Results: Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77])., Conclusion: NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.

Purpose: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that the oxaliplatin dose of 85 mg/m 2 used in various gastrointestinal cancer regimens may be infused over a rapid rate of 85 min instead of the standard time of 120 min. We evaluated the safety outcomes of rapid administration of oxaliplatin compared to standard infusion., Methods: We performed a retrospective, cohort study by chart review. Adult patients who received oxaliplatin as part of a FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI, or FOLRINOX chemotherapy regimen from January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021, were included. Primary outcomes were the incidence of hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) and treatment modification of oxaliplatin due to adverse drug events. Secondary outcomes included peripheral neuropathy (PN), myelosuppressive signs, and oxaliplatin-related emergency department visit and/or hospital admission., Results: A total of 178 patients were included (90 and 88 in the rapid-rate and standard-rate groups, respectively). Rapid-rate oxaliplatin was not associated with increased HSR or difference in toxicity requiring dose reduction, delayed dose, or slowed infusion rate, but was associated with increased rate of permanent discontinuation of oxaliplatin, 7.8% and 1.1% in the rapid-rate group and standard-rate groups, respectively ( p  = 0.032). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 72.2% and 42% of patients in the rapid-rate group and standard-rate groups, respectively (relative risk for PN, 2.09; 95%, CI: 1.43-3.04; p  < .001). There were no differences in any other adverse drug event measured., Conclusion: Rapid-rate oxaliplatin was associated with minimal treatment modifications; however, there was an increase in PN incidence. A faster rate of oxaliplatin administration may not be worth the increased risk of PN., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Abstract: A 60-year-old man diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent FDG PET/CT. After completing 9 cycles of combination chemotherapy with nivolumab and FOLFOX, he had multiple new nodular uptakes in the bilateral cervical chains and mediastinum. The pathology of the right neck node confirmed reactive lymph node hyperplasia without evidence of malignancy, suggesting pseudoprogression after immunotherapy. It is worthwhile to report these PET image patterns, as they could significantly influence clinical decision-making., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients., Materials and Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared., Results: The median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: GEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment., Trial Registration Number: NCT02635971., Date of Registration: 21/12/2015., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after TNT may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes., Methods: In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N +) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N + vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (± 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 312 evaluable patients (156 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect a 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha = 0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse event rates. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and had accrued 330 patients as of May 2024. Study support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ., Discussion: Building on data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy yields a significant survival benefit in stage III colon cancer and is the standard of care. Simultaneously, it causes dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy that may increase the risk of fall-related injury (FRI) such as fracture and laceration. Because these events carry significant morbidity and the global burden of colon cancer is on the rise, we examined the association between treatment with a full versus shortened course of adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment FRI and fracture., Methods: In this overlap propensity score weighted, retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 18 years with resected stage III colon cancer diagnosed 2007-2019 and treated with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine; capecitabine [CAPOX] or 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FOLFOX]). Propensity score methods facilitate the separation of design from analysis and comparison of baseline characteristics across the weighted groups. Treatment groups were defined as 50% (4 cycles CAPOX/6 cycles FOLFOX) and > 85% (7-8 cycles CAPOX/11-12 cycles FOLFOX) of a maximal course of adjuvant chemotherapy to approximate the treatment durations received in the IDEA collaboration. The main outcomes were time to any FRI and time to fracture. We determined the subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) estimating the association between FRI/fracture and treatment group, accounting for the competing risk of death., Results: We included 3,461 patients; 473 (13.7%) received 50% and 2,988 (86.3%) received > 85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy. For post-treatment FRI, median follow-up was 4.6 years and total follow-up was 17,968 person-years. There were 508 FRI, 301 fractures, and 692 deaths. Treatment with > 85% of a maximal course of therapy conferred a sHR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62-1.13) for post-treatment FRI and a sHR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.49-1.06) for post-treatment fracture., Conclusion: For patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing treatment with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, any potential neuropathy associated with longer durations of treatment was not found to result in greater rates of FRI and fracture. Within the limits of this retrospective study, our findings suggest concern about FRI, while mechanistically plausible, ought not to determine treatment duration., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with PM have a poor prognosis, and for those who are not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), palliative chemotherapy is currently the only option. Recently, we conducted a phase I trial (INTERACT) in which irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally (IP) to 18 patients ineligible for CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective was to evaluate covariates influencing the PK profile of irinotecan and SN-38 after IP administration. Secondly, a population PK model was developed to support the further development of IP irinotecan by improving dosing in patients with PM. Patients were treated with IP irinotecan every 2 weeks in combination with systemic FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Irinotecan and SN-38 were measured in plasma (588 samples) and SN-38 was measured in peritoneal fluid (267 samples). Concentration-Time data were log-transformed and analyzed using NONMEM version 7.5 using FOCE+I estimation. An additive error model described the residual error, with inter-individual variability in PK parameters modeled exponentially. The final structural model consisted of five compartments. Weight was identified as a covariate influencing the SN-38 plasma volume of distribution and GGT was found to influence the SN-38 plasma clearance. This population PK model adequately described the irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma after IP administration, with weight and GGT as predictive factors. Irinotecan is converted intraperitoneal to SN-38 by carboxylesterases and the plasma bioavailability of irinotecan is low. This model will be used for the further clinical development of IP irinotecan by providing dosing strategies., (© 2024 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated remarkable local therapeutic efficacy in treating patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Additionally, the combination of lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has demonstrated promising antitumor effects in unresectable HCC. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining HAIC with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line therapeutic approach in high-burden HCC patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients diagnosed with high-burden HCC who had major portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp3 and Vp4) or tumor occupancy exceeding 50% of the liver. These patients received a first-line treatment consisting of HAIC with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), along with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors between November 2020 and June 2023. The primary endpoints of this study included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)., Results: Ninety-one patients were enrolled in this study, with a median PFS of 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.75-11.78) and a median OS of 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.23-17.31). According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, the ORR was 52.7%, and DCR was 95.6%. According to the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 72.5%, and the DCR was 96.5%. Among all patients, 86 (94.5%) experienced TRAEs, and there were no instances of treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: The combination of HAIC-FOLFOX with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line therapy has exhibited notable therapeutic efficacy and well-tolerated adverse events among patients with high-burden HCC., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

FOLFOX regimen, composed of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (OXP), has been used as clinical standard therapeutic regimen in treatments of colorectal cancer (CRC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). To further improve its therapeutic outcomes, FOLFOX was combined with anti-PD-1 antibody to form an advanced chemo-immune combination strategy, which has been proven more efficient in controlling cancer progression and prolonging patients' survival in various clinical trials. However, bad tumor accumulation, relative high toxicity, numerous treatment cycles with high fees and low compliance as well as drug resistance seriously limit the prognosis of FOLFOX regimen. The "all-in-one" formulations, which could precisely delivery multidrug regimen into tumor sites and cells, showed a promising application prospect for targeted drug delivery as well as reducing side effects. However, the design and preparation of the "all-in-one" formulation with high drug encapsulation efficiencies for all drugs was still challenging. Herein, a lipid core-shell nanoparticle codelivery platform was designed for simultaneous encapsulation of variant FOLFOX composed of miriplatin (MiPt), 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-monophosphate (FdUMP), calcium folinate (CF) and PD-L1 siRNA (siPD-L1) with high efficiencies, and their synergistic anti-tumor mechanisms were studied, respectively. MiPt, a precursor of OXP, was validated capable of inducing efficient immunogenic cell death (ICD) in this work. Additionally, ICD-mediated release of damage associated molecular patterns functionalized synergistically with PD-L1 silence by siPD-L1 to overcome chemoresistance, reverse suppressive tumor microenvironment and recruit more CD8 + T cells. FdUMP, as the intracellular active form of 5-FU, could induce large amounts of reactive oxygen species to enhance the ICD. CF worked as the sensitizer of FdUMP. The enhanced long-term anti-tumor effect of the prepared "all-in-one" formulation compared to free drug regimen and other controls, was verified in heterotopic CRC mice models and ESCC mice models, providing new thoughts for researchers and showing a promising prospect of translation into clinical applications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing financial interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: This trial investigates the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy with fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in a 2:1 randomised, controlled, open-label, phase II trial in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients with R0/1-resected liver metastases., Experimental Design: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) two years after randomisation. The experimental arm (12 weeks of biweekly mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab followed by 12 weeks of panitumumab alone) was considered active if the two-year PFS rate was ≥65%. Based on historical data, a two-year PFS rate of 50% was estimated in the control arm (12 weeks of biweekly FOLFOX). The trial was performed with a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01384994., Results: The full analysis set consists of 70 patients (pts) in the experimental arm and 36 pts in the control arm. The primary endpoint was missed with a two-year PFS of 35.7% with FOLFOX plus panitumumab and 30.6% in the control arm. In comparative analyses, trends towards improved PFS (HR 0.83; 95%CI, 0.52-1.33; P = 0.44) and OS (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.46; P = 0.34) were observed in favour of the panitumumab-based study arm. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with FOLFOX plus panitumumab following liver resection., Conclusion: The PARLIM trial failed to demonstrate a two-year PFS rate of 65% after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The positive trends in survival endpoints may support future trials evaluating treatment with anti-EGFR agents after resection of liver metastases., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent data suggest that BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with right-sided tumours and ECOG-PS = 0 may achieve benefit from the triplet regimen differently than those with left-sided tumours and ECOG-PS > 0., Methods: The predictive impact of primary sidedness and ECOG-PS was evaluated in a large real-life dataset of 296 BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC patients treated with upfront triplet or doublet ± bevacizumab. Biological differences between right- and left-sided BRAFV600E-mutated CRCs were further investigated in an independent cohort of 1162 samples., Results: A significant interaction effect between primary sidedness and treatment intensity was reported in terms of both PFS (p = 0.010) and OS (p = 0.003), with a beneficial effect of the triplet in the right-sided group and a possible detrimental effect in the left-sided. No interaction effect was observed between ECOG-PS and chemo-backbone. In the MSS/pMMR population, a consistent trend for a side-related subgroup effect was observed when FOLFOXIRI ± bevacizumab was compared to oxaliplatin-based doublets±bevacizumab (p = 0.097 and 0.16 for PFS and OS, respectively). Among MSS/pMMR tumours, the BM1 subtype was more prevalent in the right-sided group (p = 0.0019, q = 0.0139). No significant differences were observed according to sidedness in the MSI-H/dMMR population., Conclusions: Real-life data support the use of FOLFOXIRI ± bevacizumab only in BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC patients with right-sided tumours., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: To evaluate response rate, toxicity, and efficacy of the novel combination of nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin [FOLFOX-A] in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]., Methods: BrUOG-292 and BrUOG-318 were two concurrently run, prospective, single-arm phase II studies evaluating FOLFOX-A as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic and locally advanced/borderline resectable PDAC respectively. The FOLFOX-A regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1200 mg/m 2 /d as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV, and nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m 2 IV on day 1 every 14 days up to a maximum of 12 cycles. Patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable disease were permitted to stop treatment after 6 cycles and receive radiation therapy and/or surgical exploration if feasible. The primary end point was overall response rate [ORR]. Secondary end points were median progression-free survival [PFS], median overall survival [OS], and safety., Results: Seventy-eight patients with previously untreated PDAC were enrolled between June 2014 and November 2019; 76 patients were evaluable. The median follow-up was 40 months and 32 months, respectively. overall response rate was 34%. Among the patients enrolled on BrUOG-292 [48 patients], the PFS was 5 months and OS was 11 months, respectively. For those enrolled on BrUOG 318 [28 patients], the PFS was 11 months and OS was 22 months. Treatment-related toxicities included grade 3 fatigue [40%], diarrhea [14%], and neuropathy [2%]., Conclusions: The combination of FOLFOX-A has promising activity in PDAC and may represent an alternative to FOLFIRINOX when reduction of gastrointestinal toxicity is required., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: In a previous phase II trial, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) yielded higher treatment responses than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the overall survival of patients treated with FOLFOX-HAIC versus TACE as first-line treatment in this population., Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, open-label trial, adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (largest diameter ≥ 7 cm) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were randomly assigned 1:1 to FOLFOX-HAIC (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 , leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 , fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m 2 on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2,400 mg/m 2 for 24 hours, once every 3 weeks) or TACE (epirubicin 50 mg, lobaplatin 50 mg, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles). The primary end point was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of study treatment., Results: Between October 1, 2016, and November 23, 2018, 315 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX-HAIC (n = 159) or TACE (n = 156). The median overall survival in the FOLFOX-HAIC group was 23.1 months (95% CI, 18.5 to 27.7) versus 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 17.9) in the TACE group (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.75; P < .001). The FOLFOX-HAIC group showed a higher response rate than the TACE group (73 [46%] v 28 [18%]; P < .001) and a longer median progression-free survival (9.6 [95% CI, 7.4 to 11.9] v 5.4 months [95% CI, 3.8 to 7.0], P < .001). The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the TACE group than in the FOLFOX-HAIC group (30% v 19%, P = .03). Two deaths in the FOLFOX-HAIC group and two in the TACE group were deemed to be treatment-related., Conclusion: FOLFOX-HAIC significantly improved overall survival over TACE in patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Purpose: The randomized PANAMA trial investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) when added to maintenance therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: Following first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, responding patients (stable disease or partial or complete remission) were randomly assigned (1:1, open-label) to maintenance treatment with either FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of progression-free survival (PFS, time from random assignment until progression or death) in favor of FU/FA plus Pmab with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, a power of 80%, and a significance level of 10%. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate of maintenance therapy, and toxicity. Survival end points were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test and Cox regressions. Dichotomous variables were compared by Fisher's exact test; odds ratios were indicated when appropriate. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873)., Results: Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned and received maintenance therapy with either FU/FA plus Pmab (125 patients) or FU/FA alone (123 patients). At data cutoff, with 218 events (of 218 needed), PFS of maintenance therapy was significantly improved with FU/FA plus Pmab (8.8 months v 5.7 months; HR, 0.72; 80% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P = .014). Overall survival (event rate 54%) numerically favored the FU/FA plus Pmab arm (28.7 months v 25.7 months; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.18; P = .32). Objective response rates were 40.8% in patients receiving FU/FA plus Pmab versus 26.0% in patients receiving FU/FA alone (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.36; P = .02). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event grade ≥ 3 event during maintenance therapy was skin rash (7.2%)., Conclusion: In RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, maintenance therapy with FU/FA plus Pmab induced a significantly superior PFS compared with FU/FA alone. If active maintenance therapy is aspired following induction therapy with FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, FU/FA plus Pmab appears to be the most favorable option., Competing Interests: Dominik Paul ModestHonoraria: Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Onkowissen, Sanofi, LillyConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Serono, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Servier, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Cor2Ed, IQvia, OnkowissenResearch Funding: Amgen, ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier Meinolf KarthausConsulting or Advisory Role: AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen Stefan FruehaufStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Merck Ullrich GraevenHonoraria: Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Servier, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck KGaA, Bristol Myers Squibb, Hexal, Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MSD OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck KGaA, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline Lothar MüllerHonoraria: Roche Alexander Otto KönigHonoraria: Ipsen, Pierre FabreConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche Pharma AG Ludwig Fischer von WeikersthalHonoraria: Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Lilly GmbH Albrecht KretzschmarHonoraria: Roche Pharma AG, Merck Serono, Shire, Amgen, Medac, Servier, Sanofi, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Schering Pharma, Aspen Pharma, Roche PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche Pharma AG, Shire, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: PharmaMar, Merck Serono, Ipsen, Medac Eray GoekkurtConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi Annika KurreckHonoraria: ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Medac Arndt StahlerHonoraria: Roche, Servier, Taiho PharmaceuticalTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Roche, Lilly, Pfizer Anke Reinacher-SchickHonoraria: Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi/Aventis, Merck Serono, Celgene, Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, MSD, Aurikamed, IOMEDICO, Promedicis, MCI Group, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Baxalta, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pierre FabreResearch Funding: Roche, Celgene, Ipsen, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Servier, AIO-Studien, Georgius Agricola Stiftung Ruhr, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, ERYTECH Pharma, BioNTechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ipsen, Amgen, Roche, Servier, MCI Group, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, MSD Stefan KasperHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Lilly, Sanofi/AventisConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, MSD Oncology, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Servier, Janssen-CilagResearch Funding: Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, Servier, Roche/GenentechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, RocheOther Relationship: Sanofi, Amgen, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Lilly Volker HeinemannHonoraria: Roche, Celgene, Amgen, Sanofi, Merck, Sirtex Medical, Baxalta, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Sirtex Medical, Baxalta, Servier, Halozyme, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD OncologyResearch Funding: Merck, Amgen, Roche, Celgene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sirtex Medical, Shire, ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Amgen, Servier, Shire, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb Sebastian StintzingHonoraria: Merck KGaA, Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Takeda, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Servier, MSDConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck KGaA, Roche, Sanofi, Bayer, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Takeda, MSD, Servier, Pierre FabreResearch Funding: Pierre Fabre, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Merck SeronoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck KGaA, Roche, Sanofi, Bayer, Sirtex Medical, Amgen, Lilly, Takeda, Pierre Fabre Tanja TrarbachResearch Funding: AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ipsen, Takeda, OMT, AbbVie, Novartis, MSD, Sanofi/Aventis, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson/JanssenNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Objective: Since 2016, bevacizumab has been widely used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Indonesia. Nevertheless, the high cost of bevacizumab has raised the question of whether the therapy is considered cost-effective and should be included in the national health insurance system. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of mCRC patients., Methods: A Markov model was applied using the perspective of the Indonesian healthcare system to assess cost-effectiveness. The health outcomes were expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the validated EuroQoL-5D-5L instrument. Data for medical costs were collected from hospital billings in four hospitals located in three different cities in Indonesia. Meanwhile, data for utility were obtained from interviewing 90 patients who came to the hospital. We compared those mCRC patients who received chemotherapy alone either with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, versus patients who received the addition of bevacizumab., Results: With the perspective of societal, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of adding bevacizumab was USD 49,312 per QALY gained using secondary data and USD 28,446 per QALY using real world data., Conclusion: Using either a healthcare or societal perspective, the addition of bevacizumab for mCRC treatment was considered not cost-effective.

Objective: Cisplatin(CDDP)is a key drug for head and neck cancer therapy, but frequently induces severe adverse events including renal dysfunction. Nedaplatin(CDGP)was developed and is used in Japan; it has certain benefits over CDDP. Unlike CDDP, CDGP treatment does not require hydration. However, CDGP is not used globally and thus safety information is lacking. Therefore, we surveyed safety profiles for CDGP-based chemotherapy., Methods: A survey was conducted at Showa University Hospital. Thirty-eight patients treated for head and neck cancer combined with radiotherapy(RTx)and tegafur- gimeracil-oteracil(S-1)between April 2012 and March 2015 were included. Laboratory-based adverse events(WBC, Hb, platelet[Plt], SCr, Alb)and oral mucositis were assessed according to CTCAE v5.0. Time-onset profiles for adverse events were evaluated after starting chemoradiotherapy., Results: In 38 patients, Plt nadir was observed following 40(30-70)Gy and sustained for 14(7-35)days. WBC patterns followed similar profiles, but for Hb, nadir was observed following 60(40- 70)Gy and was less frequently sustained throughout the RTx. Alb and SCr levels were not correlated with therapy. Oral mucositis was observed following 50(10-70)Gy., Conclusion: In conclusion, at approximately 40 Gy, we observed decreases in WBC and Plt, with an increase in oral mucositis. Based on these results, medical staffs must closely monitor patients, especially at doses within range of 40 Gy.

Competing Interests: The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Competing Interests: The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Background/purpose: To investigate the long-term outcome and entire treatment course of patients with technically unresectable CRLM who underwent conversion hepatectomy and to examine factors associated with conversion to hepatectomy., Methods: Recurrence and survival data with long-term follow-up were analyzed in the cohort of a multi-institutional phase II trial for technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases (the BECK study)., Results: A total of 22/12 patients with K-RAS wild-type/mutant tumors were treated with mFOLFOX6 + cetuximab/bevacizumab. The conversion R0/1 hepatectomy rate was significantly higher in left-sided primary tumors than in right-sided tumors (75.0% vs 30.0%, P = .022). The median follow-up was 72.6 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the entire cohort was 48.1%. In patients who underwent R0/1 hepatectomy (n = 21), the 5-year RFS rate and OS rate were 19.1% and 66.3%, respectively. At the final follow-up, seven patients had no evidence of disease, five were alive with disease, and 20 had died from their original cancer. All 16 patients who achieved 5-year survival underwent conversion hepatectomy, and 11 of them underwent further resection for other recurrences (median: 2, range: 1-4)., Conclusions: Conversion hepatectomy achieved a similar long-term survival to the results of previous studies in initially resectable patients, although many of them experienced several post-hepatectomy recurrences. Left-sided primary was found to be the predictor for conversion hepatectomy., (© 2020 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

A male patient in his 80s, diagnosed with rectal cancer, underwent transverse colon resection(pT3, pN0, cM0, and pStage Ⅱa, RAS wild-type, BRAF-mutant). However, 19 months later, intraperitoneal metastasis was detected and the patient received 8 courses of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab. Following the observation of an allergic reaction that was attributable to oxaliplatin, the regimen was changed to a total of 7 courses of sLV5FU2 plus bevacizumab. Subsequently, a marked decrease was observed in intraperitoneal metastasis. The patient completed sLV5FU2 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy. At 1 year after the marked decrease, the metastatic recurrence was not exacerbated.

We had cases in which peripheral neuropathy was augmented after changing from mFOLFOX6, a chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, to FOLFIRI and comparatively examined disease status and trends. There were no shared points with respect to patient characteristics, timing of peripheral neuropathy augmentation, drug dosage, etc. It appeared that the change in chemotherapy itself had an effect on neuropathic symptoms. Regarding the change in chemotherapy, the therapeutic agent was switched from oxaliplatin to irinotecan; the cause was unknown, but some effects of these two drugs were suggested. Future investigation, including the examination of genetic mutations, is necessary.

A 61-year-old man underwent CapeOX plus bevacizumab chemotherapyafter right hemicolectomyfor metastatic ascending colon cancer. On the 7th dayafter the first administration, he had sudden abdominal pain and nausea. Contrast-enhanced computed tomographyrevealed aortic thrombosis and a superior mesenteric artery(SMA)embolism that was considered to be associated with bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was discontinued and anticoagulation therapyusing heparin and urokinase was performed. Brain infarction of the left middle cerebral arteryoccurred on the 15th dayafter the first administration and thrombectomywas performed. Anticoagulation therapyusing heparin, bayaspirin, and edoxaban tosilate hydrate was performed. The aortic thrombosis and SMA embolism resolved with treatment, but the patient died following an increase in peritoneal dissemination. It should be noted that unexpectedlysevere aortic thrombosis occurred during the first administration of CapeOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colon cancer.

Cost-effectiveness is traditionally treated as a static estimate driven by clinical trial efficacy and drug price at launch. Prior studies suggest that cost-effectiveness varies over the drug's lifetime. We examined the impact of "learning by doing," one of the least studied drivers of changes in cost-effectiveness across the product life cycle. We combined time-series trends in effectiveness over time by cancer regimen using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. We estimated the time-varying effects of treatments in colorectal and pancreatic cancer over their life cycle, including FOLFOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine, on survival of patients. Mean prices over time by strength and dosage form were calculated using historical wholesale acquisition costs. We found consistent downward trends in the mortality hazard ratios, which suggest that effectiveness improves over time. In the case of first-line FOLFOX for colorectal cancer, the implied incremental cost-effectiveness ratio based on the observational data fell from $610,000 per life year gained in 2004 to $27,000 per life year gained in 2011. Cost-effectiveness estimated at launch is unlikely to be representative of cost-effectiveness over the drug's lifetime. In the drugs studied, the impact of time-varying clinical effectiveness dominated the impact of changing prices overtime., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

A 67-year-old man presented with abdominal distention and vomiting.Computed tomography revealed bowel obstruction due to a cecal tumor.We performed laparoscopic ileocecal resection after decompression with an ileus tube. Intraoperative findings included multiple disseminated nodules on the mesenterium surrounding the cecal tumor.The histopathologic diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, which consisted of glandular proliferation of atypical epithelial cells and dispersed infiltration of goblet cells. Immunohistochemistry showed positively stained neuroendocrine markers, such as CD56, chromogranin, and synaptophysin.The patient was diagnosed with goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix and treated with combination chemotherapy of bevacizumab, fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin.He remained free from progression for over 1 and half years with this treatment.Subsequent chemotherapy was ineffective, and he passed away.There is no established chemotherapy regimen for goblet cell carcinoid, which has the aspects of both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors.However, the present case suggested the efficacy of the mFOLFOX6 regimen in combination with bevacizumab for appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of carbohydrate antigen125 (CA125) and carcino embryonic antigen (CEA) expression and its guiding role of choosing chemotherapy regimen in post-operation patients with colorectal carcinoma.The clinical data of all patients, including laboratory data and pathological data, were collected from the electronic medical records. Kaplan-Meier Log rank test, COX regression model and subgroup analyses were employed to assess the correlation between the expression of CA125 and CEA in patients with colorectal carcinoma and the survival, and the effect on chemotherapy efficacy.Kaplan-Meier showed that CA125 expression is negatively related to the progression-free survival (PFS) of the post-operative patients, Median PFS was 1140 days in the patients with high expression, and Median PFS was 1387 days in the patients with low expression (χ = 4.715, P = .030); CEA expression is also negatively associated with the PFS of the post-operative patients, Median PFS was 1197 days in the patients with high expression, and Median PFS was 1424 days in the patients with low expression (χ = 4.992, P = .025). Subgroup analysis also showed that the patients with normal CA125 and CEA had better prognosis, median PFS was 1505 days, and the patients with CA125 and (or) CEA high expression had poor prognosis and median PFS was 1162 days (χ = 13.346, P = .001), and found that there was no statistical difference in patients with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and Calcium folinate (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in patients with CA125 and CEA low expression. However, in these patients with CA125 or (and) CEA high expression, the median PFS of patients treated with XELOX was 1082 days, and the median PFS of patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy was 1335 (χ = 4.547, P = .033).Expression of CA125 and CEA associated with the survival of patients, and have some guiding significance for chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer after operation; Compared with XELOX, FOLFOX chemotherapy is more effective for CA125 or (and) CEA high expression patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Perioperative chemotherapies are expected to improve prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM). In patients with a resectable CRLM, the adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV effectively prolongs DFS or RFS. In patients with unresectable CRLM, a neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high response rate and high liver resection rate, such as FOLFOX(or CAPOX, SOX)plus bevacizumab, FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, could be an optimal regimen for the conversion therapy.

A 69-year-old man with dyschezia was diagnosed with locally advanced colorectal cancer invading the urinary bladder and pelvis. We performed ileostomy to avoid passage disturbance because curative resection was difficult. The patient received 2 courses of modified FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. The size of the primary tumor and lymph nodes decreased after chemotherapy. High anterior resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed that the tumor stage was pT3, N0, M0, StageⅡ. The patient has been receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with oral UFT/UZEL for 6months. No recurrence has been observed for the past 4 months.

A 71-year-old woman with advanced ascending colon cancer was admitted to our hospital. Abdominal computed tomography( CT)revealed locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with suspected invasion of the liver and duodenum. The clinical stage of the disease was cT4bN3M1a, cStage Ⅳa, with wild-type RAS and UGT1A1 expression. An ileostomy was performed because of bowel obstruction. The patient received 6 courses of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab(Bev). The only adverse event was Grade 3 neutropenia. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was the absence of viable, Grade 3 carcinoma cells. This result suggested that preoperative FOLFOXIRI plus Bev chemotherapy is useful for the treatment of locally advanced colon cancer.

A 73-year-old woman presenting with weight loss was diagnosed as having ascending colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. The liver metastasis was solitary but it occupied the medial and anterior segments. The size was over 9 cm in diameter and was located adjacent to the left, middle, and right hepatic veins, making it initially unresectable. Following surgical resection of the primary tumor, she received mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy, resulting in a decrease in size of the liver metastasis. During the 15 courses of chemotherapy, an allergic reaction to oxaliplatin occurred and oxaliplatin administration was stopped. Although the liver metastasis was considered to be in a stable disease state according to the RECIST criteria at the time following 32 courses of chemotherapy, we discontinued chemotherapy due to various reasons of the patient. However, the liver metastasis continues to be in the stable disease state, and has not grown for over 5 years since initiating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy and for over 3 years since discontinuing the chemotherapy.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to elective surgery for obstructing left-sided colon cancer., Methods: Eleven consecutive patients with obstructing left-sided colon cancer between May 2014 and November 2015 were included retrospectively. All patients received SEMS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome measure was stoma and laparoscopic surgery., Results: Chemotherapy was with two cycles of CAPOX (54.5%) or three cycles mFOLFOX6 (45.5%). Median serum albumin and hemoglobin levels before surgery were significantly higher than before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.01 and p = 0.008 respectively) and before SEMS (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). Median bowel wall thickness proximal to the upper edge of tumor was significantly more before neoadjuvant chemotherapy than before stent (p = 0.003), and significantly less before surgery than before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). No patient underwent stoma creation. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in nine (81.8%) patients. No local recurrence or metastases developed over median cancer-specific follow-up of 44 months (range, 37-55 months)., Conclusion: SEMS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to elective surgery appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with obstructing left-sided colon cancer.

We report 2 cases of advanced colorectal cancer achieving complete response by FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Case 1 was a 65-year-old male diagnosed with descending colon cancer with multiple liver metastases. Six courses of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab were administered after laparoscopic-assisted left hemicolectomy. Ten partial hepatectomies and 1 radiofrequency ablation were performed as the liver metastases resolved. A pathological complete response was confirmed. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered, and recurrence-free survival was 21 months after hepatectomy. Case 2 was a 77-yearold male diagnosed with rectal cancer invading the pelvic wall and sacral foramen with bilateral lateral lymph node metastasis. Additionally, there was a cancer embolism in the right internal iliac vein. Six courses of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab were administered, and the cancer tissue was absent on subsequent CT and MRI. The cancer was scarred by colonoscopy, and the biopsy showed no malignant cells. Six courses of FOLFIRI plus panitumumab were administered as second-line chemotherapy, and the patient survived without any recurrence after 12 months from initiation of chemotherapy.

A 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with simultaneous hepatic metastasis of rectal cancer with portal venous tumor thrombi(Vp3)that developed in the bifurcation of the portal vein. Four days from the first visit, abdominal dynamic contrastenhanced CT image on the portal venous phase shows that the tumor thrombi progressed in the main trunk of the portal vein (Vp4). We decided that it was a condition of oncologic emergency and initiated FOLFOXIRI plus BV therapy. After 12 courses, tumor shrinkage and regression of the portal venous tumor thrombi were achieved, but conversion surgery was impossible because the collateral circulation of the hepatic portal region remained. The treatment target was changed to the extension of the survival period. The initiation and reinitiation of FOLFOXIRI plus BV therapy and maintenance of 5-FU/l-LV plus BV therapy contributed to disease control in 24 months and survival period of 36months.

The patient was a 79-year-old man. He had ascending colon carcinoma and multiple hepatic metastases, and right hemicolectomy( D2)was performed in June 2012(SE, N1, P0, M1[H3], Stage Ⅳ). After surgery, 8 courses of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab biweekly, then, 5-FU/l-LV biweekly and panitumumab every 4 weeks were administered because he had wild- type KRAS. Before chemotherapy, his serum CEA level was 122 ng/mL, but the value decreased rapidly to a normal level after 7months. The hepatic metastases also decreased, and the lesion was only slightly observed on CT after 7months. Five years after the surgery, images and his CEA level are both normal, and the effectiveness is maintained. Even for right colon cancer, anti-EGFR antibodies might be effective if RAS is wild-type.

We report a case of locally advanced rectal cancer presenting with perforation that was successfully resected after preoperative chemotherapy. A 66-year-old woman visited our emergency room complaining of lower abdominal pain. Abdominal CT showed a rectal tumor with fluid collection and free air in the pelvis. The patient was diagnosed with panperitonitis secondary to cancerous perforation and underwent sigmoid colostomy. A biopsy specimen of the rectal tumor showed well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and wild-type RAS. After 8 courses of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab, the tumor shrank remarkably, and radical surgery(low anterior resection with D3 lymph node dissection)was performed. Microscopic examination of the resected specimen showed that almost half of the tumor cells were replaced by histiocytes and necrotic tissue. Preoperative chemotherapy with panitumumab may be an effective treatment for RAS wild-type locally advanced colon cancer, even if the primary tumor develops perforation.

The safety and feasibility of chemotherapy for elderly patients is unclear. We report a super-elderly patient with liver metastases from colorectal cancer successfully treated with capecitabine plus bevacizumab chemotherapy. An 87-year-old woman underwent a colectomy for transverse colon. At 4 months postoperatively, she underwent hepatectomy for liver metastases. At 9 months after the first surgery, a new liver metastases(S4)was found. At this time, she rejected another hepatectomy. Therefore, we selected capecitabine plus bevacizumab chemotherapy, considering her age. After 18 courses of administration, the liver metastasis did not progress, and no new metastatic lesions were found on CT examination. Although as adverse events Grade 2 hand-foot syndrome developed, no other adverse event occurred. The patient's PS score was maintained at 0. We suggest capecitabine plus bevacizumab chemotherapy is an effective regimen for super-elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

We report a case of advanced sigmoid colon cancer that was resected after chemoradiation therapy(CRT)following ineffective chemotherapy. A 59-year-old woman harbored a lower abdominal tumor the size of an infant's head and was diagnosed with a huge sigmoid colon cancer with invasion to the urinary bladder and metastases to the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient received 2 courses of modified FOLFOX6(mFOLFOX6)plus cetuximab therapy, which was assessed as ineffective; She then received CRTwith 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions plus concurrent oral S-1(100mg/day for 28 days). Tumor shrinkage in the primary lesion was achieved after CRT; total pelvic exenteration with the removal of metastatic para-aortic lymph nodes was then performed 5 months after the first diagnosis. This case of locally distant advanced colon cancer in the pelvic cavity coexisting with resectable metastatic lesions suggested that CRTmight contribute to successful local treatment after the failure of preoperative chemotherapy.

A 70 -year-old male patient was referred to our hospital with the chief complaint of hemafecia. Colonoscopy was performed and revealed bulky rectal cancer at 10 cm from the anal verge. After 4 courses of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin(Ca peOX)therapy as preoperative chemotherapy, colonoscopy and computed tomography(CT)revealed significant reduction of the tumor. We performed laparoscopic lower anterior resection and ileostomy. Histopathological examination revealed no residual tumor cells, and a diagnosis of pathological complete response was made. The patient has been disease-free for 1 year postoperatively.

Introduction: The clinical benefit of double-front-line therapy (including oxaliplatin or irinotecan or bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine) compared to monotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) in elderly (> 70 years) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized studies., Materials and Methods: The selection of the studies was carried out using PubMed with the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "elderly," "oxaliplatin," "irinotecan," "bevacizumab," "survival." The efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected from the studies and pooled. By convention, an HR < 1 was a result in favor of biotherapy., Results: This meta-analysis (MA) included ten studies: three assessing irinotecan (FFCD 2001-02, CAIRO, and an already published MA by Folprecht), three assessing oxaliplatin (FOCUS2, FFCD 2000-05, and a published study by De Gramont), and four assessing bevacizumab (PRODIGE-20, AVEX, AGITG-MAX, and "AVF2192g" by Kabbinavar). Our MA included 1652 patients (62% of men). Concerning age, we chose a cut-off of 70 years or a cut-off of 75 years, corresponding to the available data for each study. The performance index (PS) was 0-1 for about 90% of patients, with the exception of FFCD 2001-02 and FOCUS2 which included 30% of patients with PS2. Overall, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin statistically improves both OS and PFS (HR = 0.78; CI 0.63-0.96 and HR = 0.55; CI 0.44-0.67, respectively). The addition of oxaliplatin did not statistically improve OS (= 0.99; CI 0.85-1.17) but improves PFS (HR = 0.81; CI 0.67-0.97) as well as the addition of irinotecan (HR = 1.01; CI 0.84-1.22 and HR = 0.82; CI 0.68-1.00, respectively)., Conclusion: In previously untreated elderly patients with MCRC, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin appears more effective in terms of OS or PFS than the addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan.

Important developments in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer over the last years are reviewed, with an emphasis on the most recently published data from clinical trials. The systematic review of current literature was conducted involving Pubmed Central ® research and full articles were obtained and analyzed when appropriate. Fluorouracil still constitutes the backbone of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment; fluorouracil combination plus either irinotecan (FOLFIRI), oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (CAPOX or XELOX) are chemotherapy protocols established as treatments producing similar outcomes. Actual treatment involves these chemotherapy protocols in combination with new molecular targeted drugs: bevacizumab and aflibercept (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody) and cetuximab and panitumumab (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody for patients with wild type KRAS) which confer significant survival benefits in select patients as first- or second-line therapies. The factors affecting the decisions for one treatment over other are related to the patient and toxicity drug. Finally, metastatic colorectal cancer patients progressing after all standard therapies (maintaining a good ECOG performance status) could be candidates for further therapies such as regorafenib and TAS-102. Regarding the future, promising therapies are under development for the metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and several agents are currently being evaluated in different clinical trials., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.