Search

Purpose: To investigate whether infusional high-dose 5-flurouracil (HD-FU) provides a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with a standard bolus 5-FU regimen (Mayo Clinic) in patients with curatively resectable stage III colon cancer., Methods: Patients (n=1601) were randomised to receive either the Mayo Clinic regimen or one of the three HD-FU regimens; LV5FU2, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO) or the Grupo Espaňol para el Tratamiento Digestivos (TTD), the data from which were combined to provide the HD-FU arm for final analysis., Results: Patients were evenly balanced for age, TMN, tumor grade and vascular and lymphatic invasion. Median follow-up was approximately 42months, RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.997) and OS (HR=0.96) (primary end-point) were not statistically different between the two treatment arms. Infusional HD-FU was generally better tolerated than bolus 5-FU regimen., Conclusions: Infusional HD-FU does not improve RFS and OS in curatively resected stage III colon cancer patients compared to the Mayo Clinic regimen, but is less toxic., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative radiotherapy with capecitabine and mitomycin C in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer., Methods: A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, phase II study was performed on 49 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Preoperative radiotherapy was conducted on linear accelerators (15 or 18 MV) with a tumor dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, combined with mitomycin C 7 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 and oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-35. Surgery was performed 5-6 weeks after the end of chemoradiation. The primary study endpoint was histopathological complete regression rate (pCR; Dworak grade 4)., Results: Disease stage at diagnosis was T3 in 34 patients (69%) and T4 in 15 patients (31%). Positive lymph nodes were diagnosed in 28 patients (57%). Toxicity (all grades) was documented in 35 patients (71%). Grade 3 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (25%), diarrhea (2%), neutropenia (2%), and granulocytopenia (2%). No patient experienced grade 4 toxicity. A pCR was seen in 8 (16%, 95% CI 9-29%) patients, a major response was noted in 24 (49%) patients and a minor response in 14 (29%) patients. R0 resection was performed in 46 patients (93.9%) and R1 in 3 patients (6.1%). Histopathological tumor downstaging was documented in 26 patients (53%). One-year disease-free survival was 93.3% and 1-year survival was 97.7%., Conclusion: Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine and mitomycin C appeared to be effective with low toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Purpose: To compare a bi-weekly infusion of leucovorin (LV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 2 days, plus oxaliplatin (LV5- FU2-oxaliplatin) and LV5-FU2-cisplatin (CDDP) regimens with respect to toxicity, objective response rates, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients received LV5-FU2- oxaliplatin (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), day 1; folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), days 1-2; 5-FU 400 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus, days 1-2; 5-FU 600 mg/m(2), 22-hour continuous infusion, days 1-2) or LV5- FU2-CDDP (CDDP 50 mg/m(2), day 1; plus LV5-FU2). A total of 72 patients were enrolled into this study (36 vs. 36)., Results: A total of 305 cycles were administered in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm (median 8) and 272 cycles in the LV5-FU2-CDDP arm (median 8). Grades 3-4 toxicity were as follows (LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin %/LV5-FU2-CDDP %; p<0.05): neutropenia 5/49, thrombocytopenia 2/6, anemia 6/16 nausea/vomiting 2/15, and mucositis 0/3. Response rate of LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin was 41% (partial response/PR 41%, stable disease/SD 31%, progressive disease/PD 28%; 95% confidence internal/95% CI 27-58) and of LV5-FU2-CDDP was 25% (PR 25%, SD 36%, PD 39%; 95% CI 14-41; p =0.013). The median TTP of the patients in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm was 8 months and 6 months for those in the LV5- FU2-CDDP arm (p=0.073). The median survival time of the patients in the LV5-FU2-oxaliplatin arm was 10 months and 7 months for those in the LV5-FU2-CDDP arm (p=0.003)., Conclusion: Our study showed that oxaliplatin may be substituted for cisplatin with LV5-FU2 with favorable safety and efficacy profile. The encouraging results from our study support the effectiveness of oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine- containing chemotherapy in gastric cancer and could provide a new core on which to add other agents in future investigations.

Objectives: PETACC-1 assessed if raltitrexed is non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in adjuvant stage III colon cancer., Methods: Non-inferiority required both HR for RFS and OS<1.25 at 1-sided alpha=0.05. Patients (1921) were randomised to six cycles of 5-FU/LV (n=969) or eight cycles of raltitrexed (n=952). We report the final results in 993 eligible patients who started and completed the allocated treatment (489 5-FU/LV and n=504 Raltitrexed) of whom respectively 146 and 148 died, respectively., Results: The trial closed prematurely when 17 (1.9%) raltitrexed-related deaths were reported. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were more frequent with 5-FU/LV, liver toxicities with raltitrexed. Raltitrexed was stopped for toxicity in 13.2% and 5-FU/LV in 8.5%. Sixty-day mortality was 9% versus 7%. With 4.1 years median follow-up, the HR for RFS was 1.16 (90% CI 0.99-1.37) and that for OS was 1.01 (90% CI 0.84-1.23)., Conclusion: The trial failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of raltitrexed., Funding: Free drugs and financial support from AstraZeneca.

Background: The primary objective of the analysis was to compare duration of survival in patients who received bevacizumab plus 5FU/LV, irinotecan or oxaliplatin based chemotherapy with the survival rate in a combined control groups of patients who received the same protocols alone, without bevacizumab., Methods: Pooling of the data from the several studies allows evaluation of efficacy end points with greater statistical power to detect real differences between the groups of patients who were and were not treated with bevacizumab. The 10 studies have to be used for analysis were well designed, prospective trials conducted in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma., Results: The median duration of survival was 18/12/11 months median duration of progression free survival was 8.8/7/6.7 months and response rate was 34/14/12% in the 5-FU/LV/bevacizumab group, 5-FU/LV CI group, and bolus 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Difference in OS for patients who received bevacizumab with 5-FU/LV in comparison to 5-FU/LV alone is up to 7 months. The median duration of survival for bevacizumab plus irinotecan-based chemotherapy was 20 months, median duration of progression free survival was 11 months and response rate was 45%. Difference in OS, PFS and RR for patients who received bevacizumab plus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in comparison to irinotecan-based chemotherapy alone is up to 5 months, 4.5 months and 10%. For oxaliplatin-based protocols tumor response was 43-53%, overall survival was 16.4-19.4 months and the median progression free survival was 8-9 months. The median duration of survival was 26 months (benefit is up to 10 months), median duration of progression free survival was 19 months (benefit is up to 10 months) and response rate was 59% (benefit is up to 16%) were achieved for bevacizumab plus FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin/inf.5FU/LV)., Conclusions: Addition of bevacizumab to 5-FU/LV, irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy provided significantly and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, disease-free survival and response rate compared with 5-FU/LV, irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic CRC.

Background: To investigate the activity and toxicity of high dose (HD) infusional 5-FU in comparison to EAP regimen as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Histologically confirmed measurable advanced gastric cancer, age < 72 yr, ECOG performance status 0-2, no prior chemo- and radiotherapy, adequate organ functions., Treatment: EAP arm: doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2)), etoposide (360 mg/m(2)), and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) every 28 d; HD 5-FU arm: 5-FU 2.6 g/m(2) 24 h infusion, biweekly., Results: Sixty patients were randomized. Patient characteristics (arms EAP/HD 5-FU): Median age 57/55 yr, median PS 1/1, LAD (patients) 3/8, M1 (patients) 27/22. Median number of cycles (range): EAP arm 4 (2-8), HD 5-FU arm 2 (1-8). Worst toxicity per cycle (grade 3 and 4 in%): Neutropenia 20/3, thrombocytopenia 9/0, anemia 9/13, diarrhea 3/10, nausea 17/7, vomiting 10/0 for EAP and HD 5-FU arms, respectively. All patients were eligible for response in both arms. Confirmed response rate (95%CI): EAP arm 34% [16-50%]/HD 5-FU arm 10% (0-21%), no change: 46/40%, progression of disease: 20/50, respectively. Overall survival (range): EAP arm A 7 mo [3-27], HD 5-FU arm 6 mo (4-25)., Conclusions: Infusional HD 5-FU showed a low incidence of severe toxicity. But given the low efficacy of 5-FU in the dosage we applied in the study, it cannot be recommended as a single treatment for further studies. Assessment of higher dose intensity and/or dose density of 5-FU, with introduction of other active drugs in combination, could be an option for further studies.

Metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has an inevitable fatal outcome except in a small percentage of selected patients, approximately 10-20%, with good prognosis after successful complete operative removal of the liver metastases. In patients not eligible for surgical resection of the liver metastases, chemotherapy is currently the only widely available treatment option. Controversy still exists about the criteria for operability of CRC liver metastases, and some patients, still undergo ineffective, i.e. unnecessary surgery. The aim of this paper is to analyse and compare the overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in patients who underwent incomplete removal of liver CRC metastases followed by chemotherapy, and patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Seventy-three patients with CRC liver metastases underwent incomplete operative removal of the metastases followed by FOLFIRI (Cohort A - 27 patients) or with FOLFIRI alone (Cohort B - 46 patients). Patients received FOLFIRI until progression. FOLFOX4 was used as second line chemotherapy. The median OS in Cohort A was 8 months, the median TTP was 5 months, and the response rate was 44%; the median OS in Cohort B was 19 months, the median TTP was 8m, and the response rate was 39%. There was a significant difference in OS and in TTP (p < 0.01) in favour of the chemotherapy alone group (B). Patients undergoing incomplete removal of the liver metastases had shorter survival and TTP in comparison with patients treated with chemotherapy alone.

As the number of active drugs for colorectal cancer increases, we continually revisit the question of how best to integrate them. We investigated whether sequential chemotherapy consisting of only bolus plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid could be comparable, concerning overall survival, to sequential chemotherapy consisting of bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus "new-generation" drugs like CPT-11 or oxaliplatin. Patients with histologically verified locally advanced disease and/or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, without possibility for surgical resection, were eligible for the study. The treatments were: Cohort A--Mayo Clinic Regimen (MCR) in first line, "de Gramont" regimen in second line; Cohort B--MCR in first line, CPT-11 (350mg/m2) in second line; Cohort C--MCR in first line, oxaliplatin (85mg/m2) plus "de Gramont" regimen in second line. A total of 89 patients received first plus second line chemotherapy and all of them were analyzed for survival. Number of patients/cohort: A-32 B-27; C-30. The median survival time of the patients was 15, 11, and 17 months for the patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Survival of the patients in cohort C was significantly better than survival of the patients in cohort B (log-rank test, p=0.04). There was not a significant difference in overall survival between the cohorts A vs. C (log-rank test, p=0.52) and B vs. C (log-rank test, p=0.27). It is conceivable that infusional HD 5-FU could serve as a basis for first and second-line protocols in which other drugs are added to this regimen. Infusional 5-FU plus oxaliplatin in sequential pattern of application after bolus 5-FU has the best overall survival in comparison to other cohorts. CPT-11 applied as a single drug, was not effective enough in comparison to other treatment options.

The aim of this randomized four-arm phase III study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in activity between regimens containing dacarbazine and regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma, whether there is a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine, and whether non-dacarbazine-containing aggressive regimens are in any way superior to non-aggressive ones. A total of 219 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were included in this study; 196 of them were evaluable for activity. The patients were randomized into four treatment arms: arm A (standard dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, carmustine (BCNU) 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm B (high-dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine and BCNU as in arm A and dacarbazine 600 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm C ('aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), vindesine 3 mg/m2 on day 1, bleomycin 7 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-4, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 5-8; arm D ('non-aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), BCNU 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and procarbazine 90 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-10. The four arms were well balanced with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. On an intend-to-treat basis, the response rate was 11 out of 49 (22%) in arm A, nine out of 47 (19%) in arm B, 16 out of 63 (25%) in arm C and nine out of 60 (15%) in arm D. There was a large overlap between the 95% confidence intervals and no significant differences in the response rates between the four arms. Median survival in the four treatment arms was 4, 5, 6 and 4 months, respectively, again with no significant differences. Median survival for responders (8, 11, 10 and 13 months, respectively) in all four arms was significantly longer than in non-responders (4, 3, 5 and 4 months, respectively). Arms A, B and C were significantly more toxic compared with arm D, which was for all practical purposes devoid of toxicities. The efficacy of all four regimens thus appeared comparable both in terms of response rate and survival. Responders in all four arms achieved a survival benefit. There does not seem to be a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma. Chemotherapy from arm D, might be well suited for 'fragile' or elderly patients due to the lack of toxicity.

Objectives: Amsacrine, as a single agent, was reported to be effective in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Amsacrine is also associated with a lower toxicity than cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and cisplatin therapy and has similar activity. But amsacrine has been forgotten in clinical studies of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. The aim of present study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of amsacrine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder., Methods: We have treated 54 patients (41 males/13 females) with a median age of 62 (38-72) years. Performance status was 0/2, I/27 II/17 and III/8. The treatment included: amsacrine 85 mg/ m(2), days 1-2, and cisplatin 30 mg/m(2), days 2-5. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. We applied 169 cycles (median 3/patient). Of 54 patients, 39 had previous surgery and 12 had previous radiotherapy. Histological tumor grade was I/7, II/27 and III/20., Results: 51 patients were evaluable for response (3 patients refused further treatment during the first cycle): 2 complete remission (4%); 15 partial remission (29%); 23 stable disease (45%), and 11 progressive disease (22%). The response rate was 33% (95% CI 21-46). On an intent-to-treat basis the response was 32% (95% CI 19-44). Durations of complete and partial responses were 14 (range 12-16) and 6.5 (range 3-11) months, respectively. Median survival was 9 (range 3-21) months. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grades III-IV toxicity was as follows: anemia 11%; neutropenia 37%, and thrombocytopenia 20%. None of the patients was excluded from the study because of toxicity., Conclusion: The combination of amsacrine and cisplatin is a regimen with mild and manageable toxicity. The present regimen seems to be active. Randomized study of the present regimen versus another low-toxicity regimens are necessary, especially for poor prognosis patients including those with a low performance status.

First-line treatments of metastatic melanoma are usually decarbazine (DTIC) and/or alpha-interferon based, with response rates in the range of at most 20-30%. In this study, initiated, in fact, by a temporary DTIC shortage in the country, we have assessed the efficacy and toxicity of a vinblastine-carboplatin regimen for metastatic melanoma. The regimen was subsequently applied in two cohorts of patients: a chemotherapy-naive one and in DTIC failures (because the regimen was claimed non-cross-resistant). The regimen contained 6 mg/m2 vinblastine on d 1 and 450 mg/m2 carboplatin on d 1 for 3 wk. In the chemotherapy-naïve cohort, 50 patients were included, 29 males and 21 females, median age 54 yr (range: 33-68), performance status 0+1 for 26 patients and 2+3 for 24 patients. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for activity. The response was the following: complete response (CR), 1/48 (2%); partial response (PR), 13/48 (27%); stable disease (SD), 20/48 (42%); progressive disease (PD), 14/48 (29%). The overall response rate was 14/48 (29%). The median response duration was 7 mo (range: 3-14); the median time to progression was 4 mo (range: 2-14). Toxicity included granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia grade IV in 3/50 patients and nausea grade II in 8/50 patients. In the DTIC-failures cohort, 58 patients were included, 38 males and 20 females, median age 51 yr (range: 20-65), performance status 0+1 for 25 patients and 2+3 for 33 patients. All 58 patients were evaluable for activity. The response was the following: CR 3/58 (5%), PR 4/58 (7%), SD 10/58 (17%), PD 41/58 (71%). The overall response rate was 7/58 (12%). The median response duration was 11 mo (range: 3-24); the median time to progression was 4 mo (range: 2-24). Toxicities included granulocytopenia grade IV in 4/58 patients and nausea grade II in 4/58 patients. Thus, despite the fact that the regimen achieved a response rate comparable to DTIC in a first-line setting, the lack of cross-resistance did not prevent it from being of limited activity in DTIC failures, although, even in this group, several long-lasting responses and stabilizations were noted.

Background: Doxorubicin (40 mg/m2/cycle), etoposide (360 mg/m2/cycle) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2/cycle) comprise an efficient regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, its excessive hematological toxicity led doctors to avoid using the combination. Doxorubicin is the main cause of myelotoxicity in the EAP regimen. The aim of this study was to compare an eight-hour infusion of doxorubicin (arm A) with intravenous injection of doxorubicin (arm B) in the EAP regimen with respect to toxicity, objective responses, time to progression (TTP) and survival in patients with AGC., Patients and Methods: One-hundred twenty chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable AGC were randomised between September 1994 and August 1998. Sixty patients in arm A and sixty patients in arm B were considered as fully evaluable. The arms were well balanced for age, sex distribution, previous therapy, histological grade and performance status. One-hundred eighty cycles were applied in arm A (median 2) and 201 in arm B (median 4)., Results: No difference was detected (P = 0.28) in the response rate of arm A 20% (CR 3; PR 9; 95% CI: 10-30) and B 28% (CR 3; PR 14; 95% CI: 17-40). But there was a significant difference in PD (P = 0.005) between arm A (51%) and arm B (36%). TTP (P = 0.01) and survival (P = 0.02) analyses detected an advantage for arm B vs. arm A. Grades 3-4 toxicity were as follows (arms A%/B%): anemia 8/10, leukopenia 24/26, thrombocytopenia 6/16 (significance, P = 0.05), nausea/vomiting 5/8, diarrhea 6/2, mucositis 8/5. Apart from the trombocytopenia, there was no significant difference in toxicity grades 3-4 between the two arms. Four treatment-related deaths occurred, two in each arm., Conclusions: Bolus injection of doxorubicin is superior to eight-hour doxorubicin infusion in the EAP regimen in terms of survival, TTP and PD without being significantly more toxic.

Stable disease is a category which is not included in the evaluation of the overall treatment response rate. In many studies with a response rate below 20%, chemotherapy almost doubles the survival of patients. In the most chemotherapy trials with advanced colorectal cancer patients, about 30-50% had stable disease. Despite belonging to the same category of therapy response, some patients with stable disease have achieved symptom improvement, but some have not. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the stabilization of the disease with clinical benefit is associated with benefit in survival. A total of 99 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with carboplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1-7), 5-FU (750 mg/m2, day 1-5), leucovorin (100 mg/m2, day 1-5) every 4 weeks. After 4 courses, in the case of stable disease (SD), the patients were stratified according to clinical benefit achievement in: Group A--patients with clinical benefit who continued with chemotherapy until 8 cycles or until disease progression; group B--patients without clinical benefit in whom chemotherapy was stopped after 4 cycles. Clinical benefit was a composite of assessment of pain, ECOG performance status, weight and temperature. Clinical benefit required a sustained improvement in at least one parameter without worsening in any other. Of 97 evaluable patients 48 achieved stable disease. Of 22 pts. with SD clinical benefit performance status improvement was recorded in 17, pain relief in 14, improvement in body weight in 14 and temperature disappearance in 8 pts. Of 26 pts. with SD without clinical benefit, 7 were asymptomatic from beginning of the chemotherapy. No difference was detected in the survival between responders and SD clinical benefit pts. (p = 0.24), but there was significant difference between responders and SD pts. without clinical benefit (p = 0.0004). SD clinical benefit pts. had significant difference in survival in comparison to pts. with progressive disease (p = 5.1 x 10(-6)). The results of our study indicate that under category "stable disease" there are two different subpopulations of patients with quite different symptom response to chemotherapy, different time to progression and possible different survival.

Introduction: Fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the mainstay of treatment of advanced colorectal cancer disease for nearly 40 years, and despite the implementation of various strategies to increase response rates no substantial improvement in survival has been achieved. 5-FU efficacy has been enhanced by modulating its cytotoxicity with leucovorin (LV) or by administering it as a continuous intravenous infusion. These regimens resulted in a few-fold improvement of tumour response rate in patients with metastatic disease compared with standard 5-FU treatment. The figures are still low (25%), and survival is affected only modestly [1, 2]. Cisplatin and carboplatin are also able to modulate 5-FU cytotoxicity in experimental systems [3]. Recent results of experimental studies suggested that high doses of carboplatin were necessary to achieve biochemical modulation of 5-FU cytotoxicity in vivo [6]. The use of chronobiologically determined drug over a 24-hour period may allow an increase in antitumour effect and a decrease in side effects. Experiments in animals revealed large changes in the toxic effects of 5-FU and platinum analogues, depending on the circadian rhythm of drug administration [9, 10]. The aim of the study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of combination of high dose carboplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. Carboplatin and 5-FU were administered in circadian-dependent rhythm regimen in a 4-h infusion., Patients and Methods: An open, prospective study was carried out in 99 patients enrolled in the study. The following treatment schedule was used: carboplatin 150 mg, a 4-hour-infusion, start at 8 a.m., day 1-7; 5-FU 750 mg/m2, a 4-hour-infusion, start at 6 p.m., day 1-5; leucovorin 100 mg/m2, bolus i.v. at 8 p.m., day 1-5. The cycles were repeated every 28 days. Dose modifications were not planned. Treatment response and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO criteria [11]. Time to progression was calculated from the beginning of chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from start of chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method [12]., Results: We treated 99 patients (27 colon and 72 rectal cancers) with metastatic diseases. There were 52 males and 47 females, average age 58 years (range 34-72). There were 82 patients (pts) with previous surgical treatment, 30 pts. with previous radiotherapy and 19 pts. with previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Performance status was 0 for 9 pts., 1 for 53 pts., 2 for 33 pts. and 3 for 4 pts. We carried out 469 cycles (mean 4/pts.). Ninety seven pts. were evaluated. The response rate was 28% (95% CI: 19.9-37.9) with 4/97CR, 23/97PR, 48/975D and 22/97PD. Mean time to progression was 5.5 months (range 2-18). The mean survival time was 7 months (range 4-27). The mean survival time was 11 months for responders and 6 months for non-responders. WHO grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were observed in 19 pts (19.2%). WHO grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 21 (21.2%) pts. The main nonhaematologic toxicity were diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and mucositis. No grades 4 of nonhaematological toxicity were seen, except diarrhea grade 4 was observed in one patient. There was no life-threatening toxicity., Discussion: Carboplatin is able to modulate 5-FU cytotoxicities [3]. A high dose of carboplatin is necessary to achieve biochemical modulation of 5-FU cytotoxicities in vivo [6]. The studies of colon tumour cell lines demonstrated sensitivities to carboplatin when used at clinically achievable dose level [4]. Clinical studies of carboplatin, as a single agent or in combination, in the treatment of colorectal cancer, reported controversial results [19, 20]. Animal studies indicated large and predictable changes in the toxic effects of carboplatin and 5-FU, depending on the circadian rhythm of drug administration. Mechanisms included 24 h changes in the activities of several enzymes involved in 5-FU and carboplatin catabolism or in the anabolism of its cyt

The aim of the present study, which included 24 pretreated patients (both with radiotherapy and/or cisplatin-containing chemotherapy) with histological grade I/II head and neck cancer, was to investigate whether the enhancing action of cytosine arabinoside on cisplatin antitumor activity might be evidenced without excessive hematological toxicity with the administration of short infusional high-dose cytosine arabinoside, applied before cisplatin. Cytosine arabinoside was administered on day 1 of the treatment cycle at 0h and 12h at the dosage of 500 mg/m2 (1 hour infusion), and cisplatin at 6h and 18h of the same day with a dose of 20 mg/m2. On days 2, 3 and 4, only cisplatin 30 mg/m2/24h was administered. 19 patients were evaluable for activity including 14 patients pretreated with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. 2/19 achieved complete response (CR), 2/19 a partial response (PR), 8/19 had stable disease and 7/19 progressive disease. Objective responses (2 CR and 1 PR) were evidenced in 3/14 patients previously resistant to cisplatin at the same dosage as in the present regimen. WHO grade IV toxicity for granulocytes was recorded in only one patient.

This report deals with results of chemotherapy with different antracycline combination in advanced malignant mesothelioma. Two patients were treated with CYVADIC combination including Adriamycin 40 mg/m2. There was no treatment response and both patients were evaluated as stable disease with median survival 5.5 months and median time to progression 4 months. Four patients were treated with Adriamycin 75 mg/m2 and Cisplatin 120 mg/m2. Two patients achieved a partial response with median survival 8 months and median time to progression 6.5 months. Combination treatment with Epirubicin 180 mg/m2 and Cisplatin 120 mg/m2 was applied to 5 patients, 4 being evaluable for activity. There was one partial response, median survival in this group was 5 months and median time to progression 3.5 months. The Adriamycin dose of 75 mg/m2 and the Epirubicin dose of 180 mg/m2, which were used in our patients are the highest escalated doses, not reported in literature data. Using the meta-analysis of both literature data and our study, which can be considered as a pilot study for dose escalation, there seems to be dose-effect relationship for antracyclin activity in malignant mesothelioma. The meta-analysis registers also slightly better treatment results (response rate 12.6% in 277 patients) with antracyclin containing regimens as compared to combination chemotherapy which does not include antracyclines (response rate 10.3% in 175 patients).

The response rate of advanced gastric cancer to cisplatin monotherapy averages 20% and in colorectal cancer no activity of cisplatin monotherapy has been detected in initial studies. Cytarabine is ineffective in gastric cancer and displays borderline activity in colorectal cancer. In vitro studies on cell lines from human digestive cancers have demonstrated a dose and timing dependent enhancing effect of cytarabine on cisplatin antitumor activity. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether this enhancing activity can also be demonstrated in vivo. We have treated 37 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer (21 gastric and 16 colorectal), poorly differentiated G3-G4. The treatment included-Day 1: cytarabine 500 mg/m2 0 h and 12 h, cisplatin 15 mg/m2 6 h and 18 h. Day 2-4:cisplatin 30 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Thirty four patients were evaluable for objective response. The overall response rate was 16.7% (CR 2/18, PR 1/18, SD 5/18, PD 10/18) for patients with gastric cancer and 25% (CR 1/16, PR 3/16, SD 7/16, PD 5/16) for patients with colorectal cancer. Grade 4 anemia (WHO criteria) occurred in 1/37 and thrombocytopenia in 1/37 patients. These patients had previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Vomiting grade 3 occurred in 4/37 and hepatotoxicity grade 3 in 1/37 patients. There were no toxic deaths. Our study did not demonstrate any enhancement of cisplatin activity by high dose cytarabine in advanced gastric cancer. There appears to be an enhancing activity on colorectal cancer although true synergism can not be ruled out since cytarabine has a borderline activity in this type of human cancer.

Background: Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF, humanized mAb that is the most advanced agent of its class in clinical development. Several studies have examined bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first- and second-line settings in patients with metastatic CRC. Despite of that, there is lack of information concerning the extent to which bevacizumab can be used to treat metastatic CRC. We still need more evidence related to efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in different settings, or sequential treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy and safety of bevacizumab added to different chemotherapy in patients with metastatic CRC. Methods: This was a controlled, prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Thirty patients with advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled into this study. Bevacizumab was applied with oxaliplatin-, irinotecan-, 5FU- or capecitabine -based chemotherapy in the first-, second- or third-therapy lines. Totally 261 cycles were applied. The median number of applied cycles per patient was 8 (range 2-16). Results: Objective tumor response (RR) was seen in 11 patients 37% (95%CI 19-69%) calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. The median duration of response was 12 months. Three of 11 patients (27%) with PR had secondary surgery. RR was seen in 9 of 16 patients (56%) who received bevacizumab in the first-line treatment and in 2 of 14 patients (14%) who received therapy in the second+ lines (p=0.02). Clinical benefit (PR+SD) was seen in 22 (74%) patients. 75% of patients achieved clinical benefit in the first-line and 74% in the second+ chemotherapy lines. The median time to progression (TTP) of the patients is was 9 + months (95%CI 7 - + ∞) at the moment of this analysis. The median TTP of patients who received bevacizumab in the first line was 11 months (95%CI 8 - + ∞). The median TTP of patients who received bevacizumab in the second+ lines was 5.5 months (95%CI 4 - + ∞) (p=0.015). The median survival time (OS) for all patients was 9 + months (95%CI 7 - + ∞). The median OS at the moment of analysis was 11 months (95%CI 9 - + ∞) for patients receiving bevacizumab in the first line, and 7 months for patients receiving the drug in the second+ lines (95%CI 6 - + ∞) (p=0.024). The incidence of any toxicity grade 3-4 was less than 10%. Bevacizumab associated incidence of grade 3-4 side effects did not exceed 5%. Hypertension 5% and thromboembolism 5% were the most frequent events. Gastrointestinal perforation did not occur. There was one toxic death due to sepsis and not directly associated with bevacizumab toxicity. Conclusion: Bevacizumab can safely be added to different chemotherapeutic regimens in first- and second+ line. The conferred benefit in overall survival, TTP and response rate obviously requires randomized trials.

For almost 40 years, the only option for patients with unresectable metastases was treatment with 5-fluorouracil. In the last decade, new drugs became available that changed attitude toward treatment of metastatic CRC as well as the prognosis for some patients although the "story" of 5-FU is not finished yet. Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and oral fluoropyrimidines produces higher response rates, longer symptom control and longer survival for the majority of the patients with unresectable metastases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is particularly interesting, because according to the results of some studies, it actually allows curative resections of previously unresectable liver metastases. This paper deals with the current status of chemotherapy of metastatic CRC, and some dilemmas about that issue. Also, we report results of third line chemotherapy of metastatic CRC patients treated at the Institute for Oncology and radiology of Serbia (IORS).

Gastric carcinoma is a frequent malignancy throughout the world and endemic in many of its regions. Advanced gastric carcinoma is often diagnosed. Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a median survival of 6-8 months and chemotherapy is palliative. Even in patients with resectable disease 5-year survival is generally poor. Chemotherapy is usually accepted as standard treatment for advanced disease. None of existing chemotherapy regimens has been established as standard, and chemotherapy within the controlled clinical trials is still the best option for advanced gastric cancer patients. In some trials a response rate of more than 50% has been achieved for multidrug regimens. It seems that the important story in gastric cancer is not told by focusing on the response rates in serial phase II or even phase III trials. In this disease, the success with respect to high response rates has been virtually canceled out by the fact that tumor shrinkage seems to be evanescent. There has not yet been a regimen reported that leads to a 50% survival probability at one year. A 2-year survival rate of 14% is considered noteworthy as a "long-term survival". Toxicity including nausea, vomiting, asthenia, anorexia, neutropenia, and treatment related morbidity, in patients with gastric cancer remain substantial issues, especially with multidrug therapy. Among the newer agents, oral fluoropyrimidines, taxanes, irinotecan and oxaliplatin appear to be relevant candidates for improved palliation and extension of survival. Further clinical studies are certainly needed to define the optimal role for these drugs. Gastric carcinoma has a variety of molecular abnormalities. Many of these molecules can be targeted theoretically, however, practical applications are yet to be fully developed. Limited number of studies has been done using specific targets against gastric carcinoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as the standard of care for patients with node-positive resected colon cancer. 5-fluorouracil modulated with leucovorin given for six months is currently the most widely accepted "standard" regimen. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II remain investigational and some prognostic indicators that correlate with higher risk for subsequent recurrence may be used for these patients when consider adjuvant chemotherapy. Other investigational approaches include regional portal vein infusion and intraperitoneal therapy, immunotherapy, and new drugs, with proven activity in metastatic disease. Patients older than 70 years are also candidate for adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer is often associated with radiotherapy and enhances local control seen with radiotherapy and improves survival of these patients.