Search

Objective: In the Netherlands, high risk gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) patients are treated in different referral hospitals with a national working party on trophoblastic tumours having a co-ordinating function. Our purpose was to evaluate whether this policy is a satisfactory alternative to complete centralisation., Design: A retrospective study of all etoposide, methotrexate, actomycin D, cyclophosphamide and vincristine (EMA/CO)-treated women in the Netherlands between 1986 and 1997. Data regarding risk factors, treatment results and toxicity were collected., Setting: Ten hospitals; 2 general, 6 academical and 2 oncology centres., Population: Fifty EMA/CO-treated women registered by the central registration unit of the Dutch Working Party on Trophoblastic Disease., Methods: Patients files and quarterly reports of the Dutch Working Party., Main Outcome Measures: Cure rate and consistency of treatment in different hospitals., Results: EMA/CO treatment was administered in 10 different hospitals. All patients were discussed during the meetings of the Dutch Working Party and overall, 86% of patients were cured. Consistency in treatment was good., Conclusions: Cure rates were comparable with results of single institution series. We conclude that treatment of high risk GTD patients in different referral hospitals with concentration of expertise in a working party is a good alternative to centralisation of treatment in GTD specialised hospitals.

Objective: Whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) in combination with chemotherapy is a relatively new promising treatment modality for patients with cancer. The objective of this report is to present the development of an acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) following WBH in combination with chemotherapy. Although WBH can also induce cytokine production, MODS has not been described before in association with WBH., Design: Case report. The patient was treated with WBH (core temperature 41.8 degrees C using a radiant heat device (Aquatherm) ) in combination with polychemotherapy (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) ) in the context of a clinical trial for metastatic sarcomas., Setting: Department of medical oncology and intensive care unit of a university hospital., Patient: A 58-year-old Caucasian woman treated for disseminated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus, who developed SIRS with brain dysfunction, hypotension, respiratory failure and renal dysfunction following WBH/ICE., Interventions: She was successfully treated in the intensive care unit by mechanical ventilation, inotropics and antibiotics., Measurements and Results: There was a remarkable recovery within 2 days: she regained full conciousness, could be extubated, inotropic support was stopped and creatinine levels returned to pre-treatment levels. All cultures remained sterile. After almost complete recovery, 5 days later a second episode of fever during neutropenia occurred and, despite antibiotic treatment, she died of Bacteroides distasonis sepsis., Conclusion: WBH should be added as a new cause to the already known list of physical-chemical insults which can result in MODS.

Hyperthermia in combination with chemotherapy has a strong biological rationale based on thermal enhancement of cytotoxicity and partial circumvention of resistance. Weekly locoregional hyperthermia in combination with cisplatin is an effective treatment (response rate: 52%) for patients with a recurrence of a previously irradiated carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A comparative trial versus cisplatin alone was recently started. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is aimed at situations after optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with carcinomatous peritonitis. The warmth enhances the penetration of the oncolytic agent. Whole-body hyperthermia using the Aquatherm apparatus in combination with chemotherapy is feasible: results in patients with metastatic sarcomas are promising. Trials with whole-body hyperthermia are in progress in patients with platinum refractory ovarian cancer and in patients with a metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Background: In advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or ifosfamide results in response rates of approximately 20%. Continuous infusion of these drugs is on many grounds theoretically attractive and may therefore offer advantages over bolus or short-term infusion., Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with progressive measurable disease and no previous chemotherapy entered the study. After implantation of a subcutaneous infusion chamber patients were treated on days 1-12 with ifosfamide (1.0 g/m2/day) and 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) as a continuous intravenous infusion using a portable infusion pump. Mesna (1.0 g/m2/day) was added as uroprotective agent from day 1-14. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks., Results: Fifteen of the 16 patients were evaluable for response. One partial response was observed (response rate 7% [95% CI: 0%-32%]). Toxicity occurred in 64% of the courses. Dose limiting toxic effects were grade 3 nausea/vomiting (WHO) in 3 patients, grade 2 mucositis in 1 patient and grade 4 leukopenia in 1 patient., Conclusion: Intermittent continuous infusion with ifosfamide, mesna and 5-FU is feasible on an outpatient basis. Although continuous infusion of ifosfamide may have a more favorable toxicity profile, the combination of 5-FU and ifosfamide in this schedule is no more effective than bolus or short-term infusion.