Search

Background: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy remains unknown., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma who started first-line systemic chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed between March 2007 and February 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy after failure of platinum plus pemetrexed were identified. We evaluated the efficacy of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and explored the prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models., Results: A total of 54 and 26 patients received platinum plus pemetrexed as first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively (gemcitabine in 12 patients; taxane, six; nivolumab, three; and others, five). In all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy were 16.6 and 7.3 months, respectively. Among patients who received second-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival, progression-free survival, and second-line overall survival were 16.9, 3.2, and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy had longer overall survival after second-line chemotherapy than those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.82; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Second-line chemotherapy may be an option for refractory malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, especially in patients who have completed 6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy.

Background/objective: Elderly patients with cancer are often at risk for undertreatment because of frailty, an aging-specific problem. However, current real-world conditions of recurrent ovarian cancer treatment in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify treatment patterns in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer., Patients and Methods: We used an ovarian cancer database containing the diagnosis and initial therapy of all patients at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2007 to 2014. Patients were stratified into the platinum-sensitive group and the platinum-resistant group. We retrospectively assessed chemotherapy use in patients aged ≤ 64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years., Results: Among 253 patients (sensitive group: 135; resistant group: 118), by age group 91%, 95%, 100%, 100%, and 100% received chemotherapy in the sensitive group, and 79%, 67%, 50%, 29%, 0% received chemotherapy in the resistant group, respectively. In the resistant group, the percentage of patients aged 70-74 or 75-79 years who received chemotherapy was significantly lower than the percentage among patients aged ≤ 64 years, respectively (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.412; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.628-11.959; p = 0.004) and platinum-free interval < 3 months (OR, 3.434; 95% CI, 1.401-8.399; p = 0.007) were inversely associated with chemotherapy use., Conclusions: Doctors and patients did not consider chemotherapy in patients aged ≥ 70 years with platinum-resistant disease. Older age was independently and inversely associated with chemotherapy use in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Our results highlight the importance of demographic information in clinical decision-making for elderly patients.

Background: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been approved since 2013 for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received trastuzumab (Tmab) and taxane. However, no clinical trial has evaluated the efficacy of T-DM1 in those who have previously received pertuzumab (Pmab). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of T-DM1 between patients who had received Tmab and Pmab and those who had received Tmab only in Japanese population., Methods: We identified all patients with HER2-positive MBC who received T-DM1 between April 1, 2014 and February 28, 2017 in our institution. The patients were divided into the Tmab group (i.e., those who received only Tmab before T-DM1 treatment) and the Tmab/Pmab group (i.e., those who received Tmab and Pmab before T-DM1 treatment), and progression-free survival (PFS) and best response were compared between the two groups., Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled for outcome analysis. The median follow-up period was 4.8 months, and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease before T-DM1 was 1 (range 1-2) in the Tmab/Pmab group and 2 (range 0-6) in the Tmab group. The median PFS was 2.8 months in the Tmab/Pmab group (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-4.8 months) and 7.8 months in the Tmab group (95% CI 5.5-15.9 months) (p = 0.0030). The best response was lower in the Tmab/Pmab group (11.1% vs. 25.0%)., Conclusions: Patients with HER2-positive MBC who received Tmab and Pmab treatment before T-DM1 have fewer benefits from T-DM1.

Background To determine the feasibility and efficacy of olanzapine, which is approved by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency as multi acting receptor targeted antipsychotic agent of the thienobenzodiazepine class, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing continuous five-day chemotherapy. Patients and methods This study was a prospective dose escalation study at a single center (UMIN ID: UMIN000015386). Patients received a combination of adriamycin and ifosfamide (AI) or a combination of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP). On days 1-5, all patients received intravenous granisetron (1 mg) and intravenous dexamethasone sodium phosphate (24 mg). Olanzapine was administrated on day-1 to day5 at bedtime. The dose of olanzapine followed a dose-escalation scheme, with monitoring of safety and tolerability at each dose. A 3 + 3 cohort design was used, with three to six patients per cohort. Results Nine patients were enrolled (three for each cohort). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The most frequent adverse events were dry mouth and constipation. In each cohort, the maximum severity of nausea was Grade 2, and no patients experienced a vomiting episode. Conclusion A 2.5 mg/day dosage of olanzapine is sufficient to prevent from CINV in Japanese patients receiving continuous five-day chemotherapy. A dose of 10 mg/day, which is recommended by international CINV guidelines, is also tolerated. If CINV is not controlled by an initial dose of 2.5 mg/day of olanzapine, dosage escalation is encouraged. Future studies should compare olanzapine with aprepitant.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the use of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for predicting disease prognosis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) therapy., Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma treated at our hospital from July 2004 to October 2014. Patients received dd-TC therapy as NAC followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Specimens resected during IDS were divided into 4 groups based on pathological response: grade 1, most tumor cells appeared to be viable; grade 2a, most tumor cells had disappeared, whereas the remaining tumor cells were vacuolated or degenerated; grade 2b, small numbers of viable tumor cells were observed; and grade 3, small aggregations of macrophages were seen., Results: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. The median number of NAC cycles was 3 (range, 2-6), and 51 patients (75.0%) achieved complete resection at IDS. Regarding pathological response, 7 (10.3%) patients were classified as grade 1, 11 (16.2%) as grade 2a, 46 (67.7%) as grade 2b, and 4 (5.9%) as grade 3. In univariate and multivariate analyses, grades 2b and 3 pathological responses were significant favorable prognostic factors for progression-free survival (P = 0.028; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.92)., Conclusions: Although the pathological complete response rate to NAC was low in this study, both complete and good pathological responses to NAC might be favorable prognostic factors for PFS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who receive dd-TC.

Purpose: Weekly dose-dense paclitaxel with carboplatin every 3 weeks (dose-dense TC) provides good efficacy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is common for advanced-stage disease. However, it is unclear the efficacy and safety of dose-dense TC as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, we evaluated neoadjuvant dose-dense TC chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of ovarian carcinoma that were not suited for primary debulking surgery (2003-2014). The patients received neoadjuvant dose-dense TC chemotherapy, followed by interval debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: We identified 74 patients (mean age 60 years, range 39-85 years). The FIGO stages were IIIC (39/74, 52.7%) and IV (34/74, 45.9%). Fifty-six patients (75.6%) had a performance status of 0-1. The adverse events were grade 3/4 neutropenia (55.4%), anemia (44.6%), thrombocytopenia (21.6%), and peripheral neuropathy (8.1%); no treatment-related deaths were observed. Among the 66 patients who underwent debulking (89.2%), 55 patients (74.3%) achieved optimal debulking and 47 patients (63.5%) achieved complete resection. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 19.0 months (95% CI 16.2-23.7 months) and 55.1 months (95% CI 44.6 months to not estimable), respectively. A performance status of 2-3 was independently associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio 3.84; p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant dose-dense TC chemotherapy was effective (complete resection in >60% of cases) and tolerable for advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma.

Purpose: Weekly dose-dense paclitaxel (PTX) in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) every 3 weeks (ddTC therapy) is a standard treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, there is no detailed analysis of the feasibility of ddTC therapy in elderly patients with ovarian cancer., Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who received ddTC therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital from April 2003 to April 2013. We assessed the feasibility of ddTC therapy in elderly patients aged 70 years or older (elderly group), comparing relative dose intensity (RDI) for PTX, CBDCA, and ddTC; adverse events; and rate of chemotherapy discontinuation to those in patients below 70 years of age (younger group)., Results: A total of 143 patients (elderly group, 22; younger group, 121) was analyzed. A comparison of RDI between these two groups showed no significant differences for PTX, CBDCA, and ddTC. Nonhematological and hematological toxicity profiles of the elderly and younger groups were similar, except that severe peripheral neuropathy (Grade 2 or higher) was more common in the elderly group. There was no significant difference in the rate of chemotherapy discontinuation (elderly group, 13.6 % vs. younger group, 7.4 %, p = 0.397)., Conclusions: Our study showed that ddTC therapy was feasible for elderly patients. However, to prevent severe neuropathy, PTX dose reduction deserves consideration.

Background: No standard chemotherapy for adults with recurrent/refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has yet been established. The present study aimed to assess the effect of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) chemotherapy on previously treated RMS., Patients and Methods: Adults with recurrent/refractory RMS were treated with ifosfamide (1,800 g/m(2)/day), etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and mesna (1,080 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 days. The effect and toxicity were evaluated by chart review., Results: Fifteen patients, with a median age of 33 years (range=25-67 years), were treated with IE chemotherapy. A median of six cycles of chemotherapy were administered and an objective response was obtained in eight patients. The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval=2.3-6.7 months) and overall survival was 14.4 months (95% confidence interval=4.6-28.3 months). Toxicity greater than grade 3 was as follows: neutropenia in all patients, anemia in seven, thrombocytopenia in seven and febrile neutropenia in eight., Conclusion: IE chemotherapy could be an alternative optional treatment method in adults with recurrent/refractory RMS., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)