Search

Background: We performed a phase-II-study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i. e., ifosfamide (5 g/m (2) on day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m (2) on day 1) and etoposide (150 mg/m (2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, to assess the treatment benefit for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. To date this is mainly done by measurement of response rates and overall survival, as it can be widely found in the literature. In fewer cases there is also a quality of life assessment. Here we describe an instrument well-capable for a more comprehensive statement on the therapeutic benefit by linking several study end points including quality of life assessment, the Modified Brunner-Score (MBS)., Material and Methods: The Modified Brunner Score (MBS) was used for this assessment. MBS integrates progression free survival, change of physical performance (WHO-index), a quality of life self-assessment by the patient and toxicity. A positive score means a therapy benefit and vice versa., Results and Conclusions: Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 22 were evaluable for assessment. Overall survival and progression free survival for all patients was 76 weeks (95 % CI 65.4 weeks - 87.8 weeks) and 29.6 weeks (95 % CI 24.4 weeks - 34.7 weeks) respectively. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and affection of the GI tract, like mucositis, nausea and vomiting. Mean Improvement of Performance Index (WHO) was 0.29 points. The MBS showed a score of 4.21 points (- 4.43 - 16.45 range) for the overall study group. 16 of 22 evaluable patients achieved a positive score. MBS is a suitable tool to evaluate the treatment benefit especially in non-standard therapy approaches. For WBH plus ICE, it showed a beneficial effect on overall quality of life in the majority of patients.

We performed a phase II study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (150 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 25 patients were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 20% (five partial remissions; 95% CI 8.9-39.1%). Median survival time from the start of treatment for all patients was 76.6 weeks (95% CI 65.4-87.8 weeks). Progression free survival for all patients measured 29.6 weeks (95% CI 24.4-34.7 weeks). One year overall survival was 68% and 2 year overall survival was 20%. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 74 and 33% of treatment cycles, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis. These promising results are consistent with continued clinical investigation; a phase III clinical trial with whole body hyperthermia as the independent variable has been initiated.

Background: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH., Methods: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim., Results: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction., Conclusion: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

We developed a mouse model in a representative human derived head and neck cancer cell line for preclinical studies to evaluate antitumor response, tumor-free survival and host toxicity of alkylating agents, antimetabolites, platinum analogs and taxanes alone or in combination. Ninety athymic NMRI mice were inoculated with human derived oral squamous cell carcinoma cells growing on the hind paw to an average volume of 180 +/- 80 mm3. Animals were stratified according to tumor volume into 10 groups (n=6-10) and treated with ifosfamide (65 mg/kg b.w.), docetaxel (24 mg/kg b.w.), cisplatin (2 mg/kg b.w.), carboplatin (6 or 10 mg/kg b.w.), methotrexate (1 mg/kg b.w.), and fluorouracil (15 mg/kg b.w.) intravenously in single agent or combination (ifosfamide plus docetaxel or ifosfamide plus carboplatin) treatment schedules or controls. Tumor volume was measured 3 times per week for 60 days. The average tumor volume, the overall survival time and the response rates (CR, PR) of the treated animals were compared with the data obtained from untreated controls and statistically evaluated. Untreated tumors showed rapid and exponential tumor growth. Single agent therapies with ifosfamide, cisplatinum, and docetaxel lead to significant tumor regression and improved overall survival. Low dose carboplatin monotherapy induced significant tumor growth delay, but not significant tumor regression. Most impressive tumor-free survival was achieved by combination treatment with ifosfamide and docetaxel. This preclinical study demonstrates an animal model capable of differentiating various chemotherapy regimens.

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of radiochemothermotherapy (triple-modality therapy) in patients with inoperable recurrent breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with inoperable recurrent lesions, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 2 or greater, life expectancy of more than 3 months, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function were eligible for this Phase I/II study. Conventionally fractionated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) was performed. Once-weekly local hyperthermia (HT) combined with chemotherapy (CT; epirubicin 20 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 1.5 g/m(2)) was applied within 30 min after RT., Results: Twenty-five patients, all heavily pretreated (18/25 preirradiated), received a mean total dose of 49 Gy. The median number of HT/CT sessions was 4. Skin toxicity was low, whereas bone marrow toxicity was significant (leucopenia Grade 3/4 in 14/1 patients). The overall response rate was 80% with a complete response (CR) rate of 44%. Response rates in patients with noninflammatory disease (n = 14; CR 10 patients, partial response [PR] 3 patients) were far better than in patients with inflammatory disease (n = 11; CR 1 patient, PR 6 patients)., Conclusions: In patients with recurrent breast cancer, triple-modality therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. High remission rates can be achieved in noninflammatory disease, however, local control is limited to a few months. Whether the addition of chemotherapy has a clear-cut advantage to radiothermotherapy alone remains an open question.

History and Clinical Findings: A 57-year-old man presented with dyspnoea, cough, fatigue and weight loss. He had been exposed to asbestos 30 years ago. Physical examination was unremarkable apart from a suspected pleural effusion., Investigations: Computed tomography (CT) of the thorax showed multiple pleural masses with pleural effusion on the left side. CT of the abdomen and bronchoscopy were normal. The patient underwent explorative thoracoscopy; biopsies were taken, and diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma was demonstrated., Treatment and Course: The patient was evaluated at the University Hospital Lübeck for Phase II experimental therapy with whole-body hyperthermia (WBH). The pretreatment evaluation revealed normal cardiorespiratory function and a normal contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. The patient's haematologic profile and electrolytes were normal. The WBH-radiant heat device (RHD) used for therapy was Aquatherm provided by the Cancer Research Institute (CRI, New York, USA). The patient received ifosfamide (5 g/m2, day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1), etoposide (150 mg/m2, days 2-3) combined with WBH at 41.8 degrees C (for 60 minutes). Two cycles were applied without complications and a partial remission of the disease was observed., Conclusion: Radiant heat whole body hyperthermia, in conjunction with a defined anticancer treatment and pharmacological approach to sedation, was a safe and effective palliative treatment in this patient.

Recent studies have shown that recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is effective in correcting anaemia in about 50% of tumour patients. Predictive parameters for the response to rHuEPO still need to be established. In the present prospective study, rHuEPO therapy was scheduled in 22 patients with solid tumours for 12 weeks (3x10,000 U rHuEPO/week s.c.). If response was not achieved within 4 weeks, the dose was increased to 3x20,000 U rHuEPO/week. All patients received combined chemotherapy (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) before and during rHuEPO therapy. 10 of the 22 patients responded to rHuEPO and did no longer need blood transfusions. In 8 of the 10 responders and in 2 of the 12 non-responders serum creatinine concentration was increased before rHuEPO therapy was started. In addition, the endogenous serum EPO concentrations were significantly lower in the responders versus the non-responders. We conclude that rHuEPO is primarily effective in patients with chemotherapy-induced renal impairment. The rate of the response to rHuEPO is high when the baseline serum EPO level is <75 U/l and the serum creatinine concentration is greater than normal (or the estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min).

It was previously postulated on the basis of clinical data that the cardiovascular sequelae of extracorporeal whole-body hyperthermia (e-WBH), i.e., hypotension (which requires catecholamine support) results in unique nephrotoxicity in combination with select chemotherapeutic agents. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, we mimicked e-WBH physiological conditions in a rat model. Animals were treated with and without ifosfamide (IFO) and/or carboplatin (CBDCA) at 37 degrees C or 41.5-41.8 degrees C, with blood pressure monitoring and catecholamine support comparable to the clinical setting. Ex vivo post-treatment data (24 h) from artificially perfused kidneys (i.e., histology, urine volume, perfusion rate, glomerular filtration rate, and the reabsorption of sodium, glucose, and water) demonstrated unique toxicity including proximal tubular necrosis for the combination of WBH and IFO, for WBH and CBDCA and for WBH and IFO plus CBDCA, but not for IFO and CBDCA without WBH. These data, considered together with results derived from a subsequent clinical trial and the laboratory work of others were consistent with the hypothesis.

Whole Body Hyperthermia (WBH) has been shown to have physiological effects on myeloid and megakaryocytic haematopoietic tissue via both cytokine induction, as well as hormonal changes. In order to extend this knowledge base to the erythroid cells, endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) levels were studied in 17 cancer patients receiving 41.8 degrees C WBH and/or chemotherapy, as well as in 53 anaemic and non-anaemic control patients. Pre-treatment EPO levels showed a 'blunted' EPO response in cancer patients compared to the control patients. Post-treatment data demonstrated a significant chemotherapy induced increase in EPO levels with a peak at 36 to 48 hours (independent of changes in haemoglobin) and 10 to 13 days post chemotherapy (simultaneously with a drop in haemoglobin levels). The early change in EPO levels was not influenced by the addition of 41.8 degrees C (x 60 min) WBH to the same chemotherapy regimen, i.e., ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide. Taken collectively, our data show that endogenous EPO levels in cancer patients can be effected by chemotherapy (independent of changes in haemoglobin). This EPO response to chemotherapy is not impacted on by 41.8 degrees C WBH. A relevant secondary conclusion can also be derived from this investigation, i.e., caution should be exercised as to the use of EPO levels during chemotherapy as predictors of exogenous EPO efficacy.

Preclinical studies are consistent with the concept that 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) can enhance the therapeutic index of specific chemotherapeutic agents. These laboratory investigations resulted in 2 phase I clinical studies, which also support this hypothesis. These trials were extended to 2 sequential phase II investigations of WBH plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for refractory sarcoma patients. The first study (involving 12 patients) using extra-corporeal WBH was prematurely closed to adopt a less toxic WBH technology, i.e., the radiant heat Aquatherm. To date, 12 patients have been accrued to the Aquatherm trial. Projections regarding reduced morbidity were correct. The response rate for ICE/WBH is currently 63%. The review to follow will summarize the results of these trials, as well as the laboratory and clinical data which serve to explicate the dramatic clinical results observed to date.

Preclinical data is consistent with the concept that the timing of chemotherapy during radiant heat-whole body hyperthermia (WBH) should affect therapeutic index. In order to test this hypothesis, a controlled clinical investigation was initiated. Patients received carboplatin (CBDCA) on an early or late schedule with respect to achieving target temperature (i.e. 41.8 degrees C) in alternating treatment cycles. The first cycle was randomized between patients regarding the early or late schedule for two planned sets per patient (i.e. four cycles). Ifosfamide, etoposide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor were delivered during all cycles with a standardized schedule. A total of 53 cycles involving 17 patients were analyzed. Detailed toxicity evaluation (i.e. delay in therapy secondary to thrombocytopenia, need for platelet transfusions, and days of hospitalization) taken collectively demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant advantage to delivering CBDCA 10 min after target temperature, during the plateau phase of WBH.

Tumor size is a significant prognostic variable for attaining complete regression (CR) with local hyperthermia (HT) and radiation therapy (RT). The addition of weekly chemotherapy was evaluated to improve the efficacy of thermoradiotherapy in poor-prognosis lesions (i.e. > or = 7 cm2 or > or = 14 cm3) which have an expected CR rate of approximately 30 +/- 8%. Patients were entered into a two-arm phase-II study: arm 1 = breast cancer (10 patients), ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2) + epirubicin (20 mg/m2) + HT + RT; arm 2 = sarcoma (7 patients) and head and neck cancer (9 patients), cisplatin (40 mg/m2) + HT + RT. Therapy encompassing 106 triple-modality sessions was generally well tolerated for both arms; 2 instances of grade-3 and 1 of grade-4 (arm 2) local toxicity (WHO criteria) were observed. There were 4 instances of grade-3 myelosuppression (arm 1). The CR rates for arms 1 and 2 were 70 and 19%, respectively, suggesting that the combination of ifosfamide/epirubicin/HT/RT deserves further investigation in the context of localized breast cancer.

Two earlier studies resulted in the design of a phase II trial of 41.8 degrees C (x 60 min) extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia (WBH) with ICE, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m2), carboplatin (300 mg/m2), and etoposide given with WBH, as well as, day 2 and 3 post-WBH (100 mg/m2) for adult patients with refractory sarcoma. 12 patients entered this trial; all were evaluable. 8 patients had a history of prior chemotherapy associated with disease progression. Following WBH/ICE, 7 partial remissions were observed (58%); 3 patients experienced disease stabilisation; the aforementioned 10 patients each received four cycles of therapy. 2 patients exhibited progressive disease. Episodes of WHO graded (grade 3; grade 4) toxicity observed included: anaemia (2;2); leucopenia (5;7); thrombocytopenia (1;6); renal (0;1). Other toxicities (grade 1 and 2) included: anasarca, diarrhoea, ventricular arrhythmias, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, biological interactions, and toxicities of ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 1 h in a pilot clinical study. Nineteen patients with refractory sarcoma or malignant teratoma were treated. To obtain baseline pharmacokinetic data for ifosfamide, the first chemotherapy course was given without WBH in six patients. This enabled comparison of systemic toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the drug combination with and without WBH (+/- WBH). All other patients received three thermochemotherapy treatments every 3 weeks. Ifosfamide was escalated from 5 to 10 g/m2 with a fixed carboplatin dose of 480 mg/m2. WBH was induced by extracorporally heated blood (in a hemodialysis apparatus) with general anesthesia. The drugs were given at target temperature. A total of 49 thermochemotherapy treatments was administered. The use of the hemodialysis device resulted in an approximate one-third reduction of blood concentrations of 4-hydroxyifosfamide, one activated intermediate metabolite of ifosfamide and carboplatin, but in an increase of chloroacetaldehyde, the other main ifosfamide metabolite. The WBC counts and the platelet nadirs (up to WBH grade 4) were not significantly different +/- WBH. Of 19 evaluable patients, 7 partial remissions, 8 disease stabilizations (average duration, 3 months), and 4 patients with progressive disease were observed. There was no WBH-related mortality. Toxicities observed included mild (anasarca, diarrhea, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex) and severe (reversible neuropathy, cardiopulmonary distress, and severe renal dysfunction). No hepatic or central nervous system toxicity occurred. Nephropathy was the dose-limiting toxicity. In conclusion, ifosfamide and carboplatin can be administered with extracorporally induced WBH with acceptable toxicity. Results obtained are consistent with continued evaluation of this combined modality approach.