Search

Purpose: This phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/pemetrexed combined with 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab followed by pemetrexed/bevacizumab maintenance therapy as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) limited to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-wild type., Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-wild type NSCLC aged < 75 years old were enrolled in the study. The patients were treated with four cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 , day 1), pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 , days 1), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1), every 3 weeks, followed by pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance until progression for achieving a response over stable disease after induction chemotherapy., Results: Partial response and stable disease were observed in 35 (objective response rate: 70, 95% CI: 55.4-82.1%) and 9 patients, respectively, and 39 (78%) patients received pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 12.0 months (95% CI: 7.5-16.5 months) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 22.2-39.8 months), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (14%), nausea (10%), anorexia (18%), and hypertension (8%). Coagulation disorder was observed in one patient, but all of these events were reversible and resulted in no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: The combination of cisplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab followed by pemetrexed/bevacizumab maintenance therapy exhibited favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity profiles in patients with EGFR-wild type non-squamous NSCLC (UMIN-CTR number: UMIN000003645).

Purpose: This phase I/II study was designed to evaluate a combination of irinotecan and S-1 a new regimen for salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: The study group comprised patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had previously received at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients received irinotecan on days 1, 15 and oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice daily as a fixed dose) on day 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle., Results: In the phase I part, irinotecan was given in escalating doses of 70 (Level 1), 80 (Level 2), and 90 mg/m(2) (Level 3). Three of the 5 patients given Level 3 had dose-limiting toxicity, and Level 2 (80 mg/m(2) of irinotecan) was designated as the recommended dose. In phase II, 38 patients received a median of 7.4 cycles of irinotecan at the recommended dose. The overall response rate was 15.8 % (90 % confidence interval (CI): 6.1-25.5 %), and the median progression-free and overall survival times were 4.5 months (95 % CI: 3.5-5.0) and 15.0 months (95 % CI: 9.5-20.6) months, respectively. Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3 or higher toxicity included neutropenia in 17.9 % of the patients, thrombocytopenia in 5.1 % and nausea in 7.7 %., Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and irinotecan was considered an effective salvage regimen in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and feasibility of combination with nedaplatin (NDP) and paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifteen patients under 75 years old, with unresectable NSCLC who had not previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with a performance status of 0-1, were enrolled. The dose escalation levels (NDP/Paclitaxel; mg/m2 day 1) were 80/150 (level 1), 80/180 (level 2), 90/180 (level 3) and repeated every 28 days. All patients receiving level 3 had dose-limiting toxicity. One patient developed grade 4 neutropenia with infection, two had incomplete recovery of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia by the 28th day after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Non-hematologic toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and hypersensitivity reaction, were tolerated. Three of the 15 patients achieved partial responses. We concluded that the recommended dose was paclitaxel 180 and NDP 80 mg/m2 due to the hematologic toxicity.

A 54-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnea. Radiographic examination showed an anterior mediastinal mass and pericardial effusion. Serum calcium and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) levels were elevated, and serum CYFRA 21-1 level was extremely high. Results of percutaneous needle biopsy under computed tomography guidance led to a diagnosis of moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistological staining showed the tumor cells to be positive for PTHrP and cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies. Postmortem findings were considered to indicate thymic carcinoma. Thymic carcinoma is rare, but our case indicates that thymic squamous cell carcinoma can be identified in terms of paraneoplastic hypercalcemia.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, feasibility, and efficacy of bi-weekly-administered paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In a dose-escalation study, 18 patients, under 75 yr old, with unresectable NSCLC that had relapsed or was resistant after platinum-containing chemotherapy with performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel and gemcitabine bi-weekly. The dose escalation levels of paclitaxel (mg/m2) at a fixed dose of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 were 110 (level 1), 130 (level 2), 150 (level 3), and 170 (level 4), respectively. All patients were eligible for evaluation of toxicities. At level 4, one patient developed an infection with grade 3 neutropenia and two other patients developed severe neurotoxicity (over grade 3). Thus, the recommended dose for phase II was paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 due to dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Partial response was seen in 4 cases of the 18 assessable patients, with an overall response of 22%. Bi-weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine is feasible and appears to be an efficacious combination chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy in refractory and recurrent patients with NSCLC who had been previously exposed to platinum-containing chemotherapy.