Search

New chemotherapy regimens are continuously explored in patients with high-risk malignant germ cell tumours (MGCTs). This multicentre phase II trial assessed the efficacy and toxicity of C-BOP/BEP chemotherapy in intermediate and poor prognosis MGCT (IGCCCG criteria). C-BOP/BEP treatment consisted of cycles of cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin and carboplatin, followed by one cycle of vincristine and bleomycin and three cycles of BEP (bleomycon, etoposide, cisplatin). The trial was designed to demonstrate a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 80%, that is, to exclude a 1-year rate of 70% or less, with a one-sided significance level of 5%. Secondary end points included toxicity, overall survival and the postchemotherapy complete response rate. In total, 16 European hospitals entered 66 eligible patients (intermediate prognosis group: 37; poor prognosis group: 29). A total of 45 patients (68.2%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 56.9-79.4%) achieved a complete response (intermediate prognosis: 30; poor prognosis: 15). After a median observation time of 40.4 months (range: 13.7-66.3), the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 81.8% 95% CI: 72.5-91.1%). The 2-year overall survival was 84.5% (95% CI: 75.6-93.3%). In all, 51 patients experienced at least one episode of WHO grade 3/4 leucopenia, and at least one event of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 30 patients. There was no toxic death. With an 82% 1-year progression-free survival and a lower limit of the 95% CI above 70%, the efficacy of C-BOP/BEP is comparable to that of published alternative chemotherapy schedules in high-risk MGCT patients. The treatment's toxicity is manageable in a multicentre setting. In poor prognosis patients, C-BOP/BEP should be compared to standard chemotherapy of four cycles of BEP.

A 1-year complete remission could be achieved with high-dose systemic chemotherapy in a 33-year-old patient with relapsed germ cell tumor presenting with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC). Although LC in general has a very poor prognosis for patients with chemosensitive malignancies, systemic chemotherapy should be considered.

Aims: Assessment of the quality of chemotherapy care and its quality assurance in clinical trials and daily practice., Methods: Using Medline, literature was searched combining the following words: quality assurance or quality of care, combined with anti-neoplastic agents. The bibliography of each article was reviewed for additional literature. Those reports in English, French, German or Dutch focusing quality assurance or quality of care and chemotherapy were selected., Results: One hundred and five articles were selected by Medline and after review and adding of additional literature 53 articles remained. In clinical trials information on quality of chemotherapy is sparse. Different cooperative groups reported on suboptimal dosing, suboptimal registration of chemotherapy and several trials indicated that suboptimal dosing led to impaired outcome. Most quality assurance activities in clinical trials are concerned with audit and feedback and on-site visits. In daily practice the quality of chemotherapy is mostly impaired by the fact that it is not given although indicated and if it is given non-evidence based chemotherapy or administration schedules and reduced dose intensity decrease the quality of care. Especially, age, comorbidity and socio-economic status reduce the chance of receiving good quality of care regarding chemotherapy. Activities mostly used for quality assurance are generation of guidelines, specialisation and multidisciplinary care., Conclusions: Most quality assurance activities in clinical trials and daily practice are directed to structure and process parameters. More evidence that quality of care is related to outcome should be sought. Quality assurance in daily practice should aim at guideline implementation, specialisation and multidisciplinary care and should pay attention especially to the older patients, patients with comorbidity and patients from lower socio-economic classes.

Purpose: A randomized phase II/III trial was conducted to determine whether combination treatment with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) was superior to IFN-alpha-2a alone in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Three hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with IFN-alpha-2a plus 13-CRA or to IFN-alpha-2a alone. IFN-alpha-2a was given daily subcutaneously, starting at a dose of 3 million units (MU). The dose was escalated every 7 days from 3 to 9 MU by increments of 3 MU. Patients randomly assigned to combination therapy received oral 13-CRA 1 mg/kg/d plus IFN-alpha-2a., Results: Median time to progression was 5.1 months for patients treated with the combination and 3.4 months for patients on IFN-alpha-2a alone (P = .008). Progression-free survival rates at 6 months were 43% for patients receiving combined therapy and 30% for patients on IFN-alpha-2a, and at 12 months, 27% and 17%, respectively. Median overall survival was 17.3 months for patients on IFN-alpha-2a and 13-CRA, and 13.2 months for patients treated with IFN-alpha-2a (P = .048). Twenty-two percent of the patients receiving the combination stopped treatment due to toxicity, as compared with 16% on IFN-alpha-2a., Conclusion: Progression-free and overall survival for patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IFN-alpha-2a plus 13-CRA were significantly longer compared with patients on IFN-alpha-2a alone (P = .007 and P = .048, respectively). Improvement in efficacy in the combination arm was accompanied by increased, though not serious, toxicity.

An 18-year-old male presented with a 2-week history of rapid progressive dyspnoea and dry cough due to a large mediastinal mass with compression of the trachea. Based on the raised serum values of the tumour markers chorionogonadotrophin and alphafoetoprotein the diagnosis of germ-cell tumour was made. Because of the severity of his symptoms chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin was begun on the same day and before the results of the histology investigations were known. The next day the symptoms were diminished and after completing four courses of chemotherapy there was complete remission. The differential diagnosis of a rapid progressive mediastinal mass is limited and mainly relates to malignant lymphoma and germ-cell tumours. In emergency situations if tumour markers are raised then anti-tumour therapy may be begun before any histological confirmation is available.

Guidelines are tools to improve the quality of care in daily practice. To accomplish adherence, active implementation is needed. The effect of audit, group-oriented feedback and educational activities to increase guideline adherence were investigated in this study. Treatment according to a guideline for premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients from 1988 to 1992 (P1) and from 1996 to 1998 (P2) was assessed using the following indicators: percentage of patients with breast-conserving surgery, secondary surgery, > or = 10 reported resected axillary lymph nodes, reported tumour differentiation grade, reported hormonal receptor status, chemotherapy received (CT), start of CT < or = 28 days after surgery, Dose Intensity (DI) > or = 85% and completion of CT < or = 1 week beyond the ideal duration of CT. Data were audited from patients' records. The first audit resulted in a quality programme with feedback focused on the delivery of chemotherapy and resected axillary lymph nodes and educational sessions. A Fisher's exact test was used to estimate significant differences between the two time periods. In P1, 323 patients and in P2, 155 patients were eligible for treatment according to the guideline. The percentage of patients with > or = 10 lymph nodes improved from 65.3 to 81.3% (P=0.0004), as did the percentage with a reported oestrogen receptor (ER) status, from 84.8 to 96.8% (P=0.00004), progesterone receptor (PR) status from 82.3% to 97.4% (P<0.000001) and with a DI > or = 85%, from 74.9 to 93.9% (P=0.000003). Adherence varied between the hospitals. In conclusion, significant improvements were observed for the indicators of resected axillary lymph nodes and DI of chemotherapy, which may be attributed to the quality programme. Repeated assessment of the adherence to the guideline is important to observe changes and interhospital variations in order to remain focused on areas for improvement.

Purpose: To describe global quality of life (GLQL) in patients with metastatic testicular cancer (TC) treated with four different schedules of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy (four v three cycles given over 5 v 3 days)., Patients and Methods: Quality-of-life data were prospectively collected in 666 patients with metastatic TC entered into the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 30941/United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trial TE20, using the EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 and a TC module. Data were analyzed by a mixed effects model and by evaluation of clinically relevant changes at 2 years., Results: The pattern of GLQL changes was similar in the four groups. Two years after chemotherapy, 36% of patients displayed improved GLQL as compared with baseline, whereas GLQL had deteriorated in 13%. At 3 months, patients receiving the 3-day regimen experienced increased gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity more than those receiving the 5-day regimen, with the difference reaching the level of clinical relevance (>or = 10-point change) if four cycles were given. The 3-day schedule increased the 2-year risk of tinnitus, with clinical relevance demonstrated after four cycles. Long-term peripheral neuropathy and Raynaud-like phenomena were not associated with the number of cycles or days per cycle. At 2 years, Raynaud-like phenomena, tinnitus, or reduced hearing were reported by 21% to 26% of the patients., Conclusion: Because of the excess of acute GI toxicity and the increased risk of tinnitus after the 3-day regimen, we recommend the 5-day regimen if four cycles of BEP are planned. If only three cycles are to be given, then the 3-day regimen is acceptable, even given the increased risk of nausea/vomiting at 3 months.

Purpose: This randomized trial evaluated antitumor activity of and survival asociated with high-dose-intensity chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HD-MVAC) versus MVAC in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC)., Patients and Methods: A total of 263 patients with metastatic or advanced TCC who had no prior chemotherapy were randomized to HD-MVAC (2-week cycles) or MVAC (4-week cycles)., Results: Using an intent-to-treat analysis, at a median follow-up of 38 months, on the HD-MVAC arm there were 28 complete responses (CRs) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PRs) (41%), for an overall response of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 70%). On the MVAC arm, there were 12 CRs (9%) and 53 PRs (41%), for an overall response of 50% (95% CI, 42% to 59%). The P value for the difference in CR rate was.009; and for the overall response, it was.06. There was no statistically significant difference in survival (P =.122) or time to progression (P =.114). Progression-free survival was significantly better with HD-MVAC (P=.037; hazard ratio.75; 95% CI.58 to.98). The median progression-free survival time was 9.1 months on the HD-MVAC arm versus 8.2 months on the MVAC arm. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 24.7% for HD-MVAC (95% CI, 17.1% to 32.3%) versus 11.6% for MVAC (95% CI, 5.9% to 17.4%)., Conclusion: With HD-MVAC, it was possible to deliver twice the doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in half the time, with fewer dose delays and less toxicity. Although a 50% difference in median overall survival was not detected, a benefit was observed in progression-free survival, CR rates, and overall response rates with HD-MVAC.

Purpose: To test the equivalence of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and of the 5-day schedule versus 3 days per cycle in good-prognosis germ cell cancer., Patients and Methods: The study was designed as a 2 x 2 factorial trial. The aim was to rule out a 5% decrease in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The study included the assessment of patient quality of life. A cycle of BEP consisted of etoposide 500 mg/m(2), administered at either 100 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 165 mg/m(2) days 1 through 3, cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), administered at either 20 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 50 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2. Bleomycin 30 mg was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 during cycles 1 through 3. The randomization procedure allowed some investigators to participate only in the comparison of three versus four cycles., Results: From March 1995 until April 1998, 812 patients were randomly assigned to receive three or four cycles: of these, 681 were also randomly assigned to the 5-day or the 3-day schedule. Histology, marker values, and disease extent are well balanced in the treatment arms of the two comparisons. The projected 2-year PFS is 90.4% on three cycles and 89.4% on four cycles. The difference in PFS between three and four cycles is -1.0% (80% confidence limit [CL], -3.8%, +1.8%). Equivalence for three versus four cycles is claimed because both the upper and lower bounds of the 80% CL are less than 5%. In the 5- versus 3-day comparison, the projected 2-year PFS is 88.8% and 89.7%, respectively (difference, -0.9%, (80% CL, -4.1%, +2.2%). Hence, equivalence is claimed in this comparison also. Frequencies of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were essentially similar. Quality of life was maintained better in patients receiving three cycles; no differences were detected between 3 and 5 days of treatment., Conclusion: We conclude that three cycles of BEP, with etoposide at 500 mg/m(2), is sufficient therapy in good-prognosis germ cell cancer and that the administration of the chemotherapy in 3 days has no detrimental effect on the effectiveness of the BEP regimen.

Background: Based on the favorable results of the combination 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin and interferon-alpha as second-line treatment in advanced metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract a confirmatory study was executed in a multicenter setting., Patients and Methods: In this open label phase II study 43 patients failing adequate previous chemotherapy were treated with IFN-alpha2b 5 MU/m2 subcutaneously for 5 consecutive days starting on day 1 and 22 simultaneous with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion. In between the same dose of IFN-alpha2b was given 3 times weekly with CDDP 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. This cycle was repeated every six weeks., Results: In 40 eligible patients 5 PR were seen (12.5%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 4.1%-26.8%). The major toxicity was hematological. Two toxic deaths were seen due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage., Conclusions: In view of these results this combination can not be recommended as second line treatment for metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma response rates of 7-26% have been achieved with immunotherapy. A high response rate of 48% in 35 patients has been reported for treatment with the combination of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (Atzpodien et al (1993a) Eur J Cancer29A: S6-8). We conducted a multicentre phase II study to confirm these results. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients were treated as outpatients with an 8-week treatment cycle. Recombinant human IL-2 20 MU m(-2) was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) three times a week (t.i.w) in weeks 1 and 4 and 5 MU m(-2) t.i.w. in weeks 2 and 3. Recombinant human IFN-alpha 2a 6 MU m(-2) was administered s.c. once in weeks 1 and 4 and t.i.w. in weeks 2 and 3, and 9 MU m(-2) t.i.w. in weeks 5-8. 5-FU (750 mg m(-2)) was given as a bolus injection intravenous once a week in weeks 5-8. The treatment cycle was repeated once in case of response or minor response. Fifty-two patients entered the study. All had undergone a nephrectomy and had progressive metastatic disease. The median WHO-performance status was 1, the median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range 1-5) and the median time between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the start of treatment was 12.9 months (range 1-153). Among the 51 patients, including four patients with early progressive disease, who were evaluable for response, the response rate was 11.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-20.7%), with no complete responses. Median duration of response was 8.3 (range 3.8-22.4+) months. Median survival was 16.5 (range 1.8-30.5+) months. Grade 3/4 toxicity (WHO) occurred in 29/52 (55.8%) of the patients in cycle 1 and in 6/16 (37.5%) of the patients in cycle 2. It consisted mainly of anorexia, fatigue, nausea, fever and leucocytopenia. We cannot confirm the high response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with the combination of IFN-alpha, IL-2 and 5-FU, as described by Atzpodien et al.

The standard chemotherapy regimen in metastatic germ-cell cancer is bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP). Chemotherapy studies testing cisplatin dosage and the substitution of ifosfamide for bleomycin have not shown this to be superior to BEP. Paclitaxel (Taxol) has demonstrated promising activity as a second-line treatment in patients with relapsing or cisplatin-refractory germ-cell cancer. Hence, the potential of incorporating paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy should be investigated. We assessed the feasibility of the addition of paclitaxel to BEP (T-BEP) in a phase I/II study in patients with intermediate- or poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer or with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Paclitaxel was investigated at dose levels of 75, 125, 175 and 200 mg/m2 given as a 3 hr infusion on day 1, before the start of BEP. BEP comprised etoposide at a dose of either 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 or 100 mg/m2 on days 1-5. To deliver the highest possible dose of paclitaxel into BEP, all patients received filgrastim (G-CSF). Thirty patients were entered, 14 of whom had intermediate- (n = 7) or poor- (n = 7) prognosis germ-cell cancer. Paclitaxel up to 200 mg/m2 and BEP at 360 mg/m2 was well tolerated. There was minimal neurosensory and no neuromotor toxicity with the use of 4 T-BEP cycles. More pronounced myelotoxicity and diarrhea at the higher dose level of etoposide resulted in a recommended dose level for multicenter phase II/III testing of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and BEP 500 mg/m2. Of the 13 evaluable patients with intermediate- or poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer, all achieved complete response. With a median follow-up of 18 months, none of these patients has relapsed. We conclude that T-BEP is a well-tolerated induction regimen that should be further tested for its therapeutic potential. A randomized phase II/III study of T-BEP vs. BEP has been started as an EORTC trial in patients with intermediate-prognosis disease.

Purpose: To prospectively determine the efficacy of repeated high-dose alkylating chemotherapy to salvage patients with germ-cell tumors who relapsed after adequate first-line chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients with germ-cell cancers relapsing from a first, second or third complete remission induced by chemotherapy were offered to participate in a Dutch national prospective trial with broad entry criteria. The salvage treatment began with a conventional dose of ifosfamide (4 g/m2 on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) followed by daily s.c. administration of G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg) until peripheral blood progenitor cells had been harvested. Immediately after bone marrow recovery, an intermediate dose chemotherapy course of carboplatin (target AUC: 10 mg.ml-1 min on day 1) and etoposide (500 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5) was given with G-CSF daily s.c. After bone marrow recovery, two subsequent courses of high-dose 'CTC' chemotherapy were given, each containing cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (480 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target AUC: 20 mg.ml-1 min). The high-dose chemotherapy was administered as 30-60-minute infusions, divided over 4 days and the stem-cell transplants were given 48-72 hours after the last chemotherapy infusion. Whenever possible, residual masses were resected at the end of treatment., Results: Thirty-five patients were treated between January 1994 and October 1997. The toxicity of the treatment was manageable. Second CTC courses were administered in 25 patients and were associated with hemorrhagic cystitis and veno-occlusive disease in 3 and 4 patients, respectively. One patient who had recently undergone a partial hepatectomy, died of veno-occlusive disease. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up of the surviving patients was 37 months (range 12-56 months). The median progression-free survival for all patients was 44 months, and the median overall survival has not been reached. According to the internationally accepted criteria for predicting the outcome of salvage chemotherapy in germ-cell cancer (Beyer et al. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2638-45), 30 patients had 'good risk' criteria. Of these, 29 received high-dose chemotherapy. Of this group, the salvage rate at two years was 65% (95% confidence interval: 49.5%-85.1%)., Conclusions: Over half of the germ-cell cancer patients relapsing from a chemotherapy-induced complete remission can be salvaged by a treatment strategy that incorporates high-dose chemotherapy, even when treatment is given in a multi-center setting. These data confirm the international prognostic model proposed by Beyer et al. in a prospectively studied, independent patient group and provide further evidence that high-dose therapy has a role in the salvage setting of patients with germ-cell cancer.

Background: Because metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer is a rare but treatable cancer, we have explored whether there is an association between the experience of the treating institution with this disease and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly patients with a poor prognosis., Methods: We analyzed data on 380 patients treated in one of 49 institutions participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Medical Research Council randomized trial of four cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin followed by two cycles of etoposide-cisplatin versus three cycles of bleomycin-vincristine-cisplatin followed by three cycles of etoposide-ifosfamide-cisplatin-bleomycin, both treatment regimens given with or without filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Institutions were divided into four groups based on the total number of patients entered in the trial. The groups were compared by use of the Cox proportional hazards model stratified for treatment with filgrastim and for patient prognosis as defined by the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group. With the use of this classification, only 65 % of the patients had a poor prognosis., Results: Patients treated in the 26 institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial had an overall survival that was statistically significantly worse (two-sided P = .010; hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% confidence interval = 1.16-3.03) than that of patients treated in the 23 institutions that entered five patients or more. Overall survival and failure-free survival were similar among institutions that entered at least five patients. The observed effect may be related to differences in adherence to the chemotherapy protocol and in the frequency and extent of surgery for residual masses, although only the differences in dose intensity achieved statistical significance., Conclusions: Patients treated in institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial appeared to have poorer survival than those treated in institutions that entered a larger number of patients with "poor-prognosis" nonseminoma.

Chemotherapy in head and neck cancer can be given in metastatic disease at presentation, in locally far advanced disease not amendable for curative treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy, in the neo-adjuvant setting, in recurrent disease after previous surgery and radiotherapy and either concurrent or alternating with radiotherapy. Most data are gathered in the recurrent and locally far advanced disease setting. Combination therapy (with agents such as cisplatinum, 5-FU and methotrexate) have shown some improvements in response rate, however no obvious survival advantage over monotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic or advanced locoregional cancer of the head and neck has been observed. In the neo-adjuvant setting, chemotherapy is helpful in preserving the larynx and hypopharynx but has no proven impact (positive or negative) on survival. New compounds and approaches are needed to improve survival in head and neck cancer. Among the new options for chemotherapy in metastatic/recurrent disease are the taxanes. With monotherapy docetaxel, response rates of 23%-42% are seen, and, when used in combination with cisplatinum and 5-FU, response rates of 52-100% have been reported in phase I/II trials. A phase III trial of the addition of docetaxel to standard neo-adjuvant therapy with cisplatinum and 5-FU is now underway.

Purpose: To determine the effect of r-metHu granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the proportion of patients with metastatic poor-prognosis malignant germ cell tumors who receive full dose-intensity combination chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: In a phase III study patients received six cycles of BEP/EP (etoposide, and cisplatin, plus or minus bleomycin) or six cycles of BOP/VIP-B (bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin/etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, bleomycin). A subset were secondarily randomized to receive or not receive filgrastim. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was administered subcutaneously on days 3 through 9 after each BOP and on days 6 through 19 after each VIP, BEP, or EP cycle., Results: Eighty-five percent of 120 eligible patients randomized to filgrastim received at least six chemotherapy cycles compared with 70% of 130 patients randomized to not receive filgrastim (VCP = .003). Patients in the filgrastim-arm achieved significantly higher dose-intensities. Neutropenic fever occurred in 25 of 128 filgrastim-patients and in 38 of 129 non-filgrastim-patients (P = .052). Twelve and three toxic deaths occurred in the non-filgrastim- and filgrastim-arms, respectively. Nine of the 12 toxic deaths and all of the three toxic deaths were associated with febrile grade 4 neutropenia. Failure-free and overall survival were similar in both arms., Conclusion: During combination chemotherapy in patients with malignant germ cell tumors, the routine use of filgrastim significantly improved the delivery of the planned treatment schedule without effect on failure-free or overall survival. The use of filgrastim was associated with a clinically important reduction in the number of toxic deaths, confined to the experimental intensified-chemotherapy schedule. This study does not support the routine use of filgrastim during standard chemotherapy with BEP.

Purpose: This prospective randomized multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (CEB) versus cisplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (BEP) in first-line chemotherapy of patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors., Patients and Methods: Between September 1989 and May 1993, a total of 598 patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were randomized to receive four cycles of either BEP or CEB. In each cycle, the etoposide dose was 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and the bleomycin dose was 30 U on day 2. BEP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. For CEB patients, the carboplatin dose was calculated from the glomerular filtration rate to achieve a serum concentration x time of 5 mg/mL x minutes. Chemotherapy was recycled at 21-day intervals to a total of four cycles., Results: Of patients assessable for response, 253 of 268 (94.4%) of those allocated to receive BEP achieved a complete response, compared with 227 of 260 (87.3%) allocated to receive CEB (P = .009). There were 30 treatment failures in the 300 patients allocated to BEP and 79 in the 298 allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 26.9; P < .001), which led to failure-free rates at 1 year of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88% to 94%) and 77% (95% CI, 72% to 82%), respectively. There were 10 deaths in patients allocated to BEP and 27 in patients allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 8.77; P = .003), which led to 3-year survival rates of 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%) and 90% (95% CI, 86% to 94%), respectively., Conclusion: With these drug doses and schedules, combination chemotherapy based on carboplatin was inferior to that based on cisplatin. This BEP regimen that contains moderate doses of etoposide and bleomycin is effective in the treatment of patients with good-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma.

S9788 is a new triazineaminopiperidine derivate capable of reversing multidrug resistance (MDR) in cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin. It does not belong to a known class of MDR revertants, but its action involves the binding of P-glycoprotein. Thirty-eight evaluable patients with advanced colorectal or renal cell cancer were treated with doxorubicin alone (16 patients) followed after disease progression with combination treatment of doxorubicin plus S9788 (12 patients) or upfront with the combination of doxorubicin plus S9788 (22 patients). S9788 was given i.v. as a loading dose of 56 mg m-2 over 30 min followed by doxorubicin given at 50 mg m-2 as a bolus infusion. Thereafter, a 2-h infusion of S9788 was administered at escalating doses ranging from 24 to 120 mg m-2 in subsequent cohorts of 4-10 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that concentrations of S9788 that are known to reverse MDR in vitro were achieved in patients at non-toxic doses. Compared with treatment with doxorubicin alone, treatment with the combination of doxorubicin and S9788 produced a significant increase in the occurrence of WHO grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. Treatment with S9788 was cardiotoxic as it caused a dose-dependent and reversible increase in corrected QT intervals as well as clinically non-significant arrhythmias on 24- or 48-h Holter recordings. Although clinically relevant cardiac toxicities did not occur, the study was terminated as higher doses of S9788 may increase the risk of severe cardiac arrhythmias. Twenty-nine patients treated with S9788 plus doxorubicin were evaluable for response, and one patient, who progressed after treatment with doxorubicin alone, achieved a partial response. We conclude that S9788 administered at the doses and schedule used in this study results in relevant plasma concentrations in humans and can safely be administered in combination with doxorubicin.

High response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma have been achieved with combination chemoimmunotherapy. A response rate of 62% in 45 patients has been reported for treatment with dacarbazine, bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine (BOLD) plus interferon alpha (IFN-alpha). We conducted a multicentre phase II study to confirm these results. Melanoma patients with distant metastases were treated as outpatients with dacarbazine 200 mg m(-2) on days 1-5, vincristine 1 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 4, bleomycin 15 mg on days 2 and 5 i.v. and lomustine 80 mg orally on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. IFN-alpha-2b was initiated s.c. on day 8 at 3 MU daily for 6 weeks, and 6 MU t.i.w. thereafter. Forty-three patients entered the study. The median number of metastatic sites was three (range 1-5), and 81% of patients had visceral metastases. Nine patients had brain metastases, and seven patients were systemically pretreated. Among the 41 patients that were evaluable for response, the response rate was 27% (95% CI 14-3%), with one complete and ten partial remissions. The response rate in 25 previously untreated patients without brain metastases was 40% (95% CI 21-61%). Median duration of response was 6 (range 2-14+) months; median overall survival was 5 (1-26) months. The main toxicity was malaise/fatigue. We confirm that BOLD plus IFN-alpha has activity in metastatic melanoma. The lower response rate in our study compared with the previous report is probably related to patient selection, as in the previous study 46% of patients had stage III disease, whereas all our patients had stage IV disease, which is associated with a worse prognosis.

We investigated the prognostic value of the serum half-life of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) during induction chemotherapy and the relative prognostic importance of initial marker concentrations and marker half-life. Marker half-lives were calculated using two abnormal values observed between day 8 and day 22 of the first chemotherapy cycle. Moreover, analyses were carried out using day 43 as the second measurement point. Treatment failure at any time was chosen as the end point. The relative prognostic influence of marker half-lives and initial marker concentrations was tested in univariate and multivariate analyses. Half-lives were considered to be prolonged if > 3 days for HCG and > 6 days for AFP. In addition, we separated patients into those with half-lives > 6 days for HCG and those with half-lives > 10 days for AFP to examine whether these long half-lives were associated with a poor prognosis. A group of 669 patients treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy was studied. Forty-two per cent of the patients had normal HCG and 37% had normal AFP at the start of chemotherapy. At day 22, HCG was still elevated in 138 patients and AFP in 211. At day 43, the numbers of these patients were 35 and 80 respectively. Based on the measurements obtained on day 8 and day 22, a half-life of HCG > 3 days or > 6 days and/or a half-life AFP > 6 days or > 10 days did not accurately predict treatment failure (P=0.413 and P=0.851, respectively; values obtained using tests for trend). However, initial marker concentrations of HCG and/or AFP > 1000 IU l(-1) were highly significant prognosticators for treatment failure (P=0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively), independent of half-life values. Half-lives calculated with the values obtained on day 43 did not contribute to the accuracy of the prediction of treatment failure. We conclude that half-lives of HCG and AFP during induction chemotherapy are inaccurate parameters for the prediction of treatment failure. In contrast, initial serum concentrations of HCG and AFP are highly significant in the prediction of unfavourable treatment outcome.

We have investigated whether an alternating induction chemotherapy regimen of PVB/BEP is superior to BEP in patients with poor-prognosis testicular non-seminoma. A total of 234 eligible patients were randomised to receive an alternating schedule of PVB/BEP for a total of four cycles or four cycles of BEP. Poor prognosis was defined as any of the following: lymph node metastases larger than 5 cm, lung metastases more than four in number or larger than 2 cm, haematogenic spread outside the lungs, such as in liver and bone, human chorionic gonadotrophin > 10,000 IU l-1 or alphafetoprotein > 1000 IU l-1. The complete response (CR) rates to PVB/BEP and BEP were similar, 76% and 72% respectively (P = 0.58). In addition, there was no significant difference in relapse rate, disease-free and overall survival at an average follow-up of 6 years. The 5-year progression-free and survival rates in both treatment groups were approximately 80%. The PVB/BEP regime was more toxic with regard to bone marrow function; the frequencies of leucocytes below 1000 microliters-1, leucocytopenic fever and platelets below 25,000 microliters-1, throughout four cycles were 28% vs 5% (P < 0.001), 16% vs 5% (P = 0.006), and 10% vs 1% (P = 0.001) respectively. Neuropathy also occurred more often in the PVB/BEP arm: 47% vs 25% (P = 0.001). This study shows that an alternating regimen of PVB/BEP is not superior to BEP and that it is more myelo- and neurotoxic.

Background: In a group of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with high dose immunotherapy, there was an unexpectedly high incidence of severe cardiac adverse effects., Methods: Sixteen patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) and alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN). Each treatment cycle consisted of IL-2 at a dose of 12 MIU/m2 and alpha-IFN at a dose of 3 MIU/m2, given as intravenous bolus injections every 8 hours on Days 1-5, every 3 weeks for a total of three cycles. Before treatment, careful cardiologic screening was performed, including electrocardiogram (ECG), stress test, cardiac multiple uptake-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan, and echocardiography. During therapy, patients were monitored with daily ECG and creatine phosphokinase measurements. Once cardiac damage was suspected, IL-2 and alpha-IFN were discontinued, and echocardiography, stress test and MUGA-scan were repeated. If indicated, cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsies was performed., Results: Despite pretreatment cardiac screening, seven patients (44%) exhibited myocardial injury. Acute myocardial infarction occurred in one patient, cardiomyopathy developed in four, asymptomatic ECG changes appeared in one, and 1 patient died of acute cardiac arrest. Echocardiography showed hypokinesis and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. These abnormalities disappeared within 6 months. Cardiac catheterization in four affected patients revealed normal coronary arteries, but endomyocardial biopsies showed interstitial edema, vacuolation, and degeneration of myocytes. Electron-microscopic examination showed fragmentation of myofibrils, swelling of mitochondria and loss of mitochondrial cristae., Conclusions: This intensive treatment schedule of IL-2 and alpha-IFN is prohibited by severe and life-threatening cardiac toxicity.

The efficacy of tumor therapy using polyethylene-glycol-modified interleukin-2 (PEG-IL-2), alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, was studied in advanced metastatic disease in the guinea pig. Line 10 (L10) tumor cells appeared in the axillary lymph node only 7 days after intradermal tumor-cell inoculation, and lymph-node leukocytes were almost completely replaced by tumor cells on day 28. Local treatment of the intradermally growing L10 hepatocarcinoma in the guinea pig with a relatively low dose of PEG-IL-2 resulted in regression of the primary tumor and prevention of lymph-node metastases. Therapy was completely curative (4 out of 5 animals) when started on day 7 or 14 after tumor-cell inoculation. When started on day 21, therapy was effective in only some (2 out of 5 cured) of the treated animals. Anti-tumor effects against the primary tumor and against lymph-node metastases were observed only after intratumoral (i.t.) administration of PEG-IL-2. Injection of the agent into or near lymph-node metastases in the absence of the primary tumor had no curative effect. In PBS/BSA-treated control animals the primary tumor and metastases grew progressively. In the treatment of far advanced metastatic disease, the combination of i.t. administration of PEG-IL-2 and i.p. injection of cyclophosphamide (Cy) resulted in improved anti-tumoral effects (5/5 guinea pigs were cured) when compared with monotherapy using either agent (one and none out of 5 animals cured, respectively). PBS/BSA heated controls showed progressive tumor-growth. We conclude that large primary tumors and lymph-node metastases can be treated effectively with PEG-IL-2. The i.t. route of administration is of major importance in the treatment of metastases, since administration of PEG-IL-2 near or into the lymph node had no therapeutic effect. Combination of PEG-IL-2 therapy with systemic injections of Cy significantly improved the curative effects of the treatment of advanced metastatic cancer.

Background: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone., Patients and Methods: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone., Results: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms., Conclusion: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), when combined with leucovorin (LV) or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), may result in improved response rates compared with 5-FU alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The authors investigated the clinical efficacy of combining these three agents for patients in this group., Methods: Forty-five patients were administered outpatient high-dose 5-FU, 60 mg/kg/48 hours (2400 mg/m2/48 hours) continuous intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2; LV, 90 mg orally every 6 hour, 8 times during 5FU infusion; and recombinant IFN-alpha-2b, 10 x 10(6) IU/dose subcutaneously on days 1, 3, and 5. Cycles were repeated weekly for 4 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter., Results: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response, and 11 patients (25%; 95% confidence interval, 12-38%) achieved a partial response with a median duration of 11 months. Median survival time for all patients was 11 months. Grade 3 and Grade 4 toxicities occurred in 21 patients (47%), which necessitated discontinuation of treatment in 2 patients (4%); permanent dose reductions were necessary in 11 patients (24%). The addition of IFN-alpha produced more 5-FU-related toxicity compared with a previous study in which the same dosage and schedule of 5-FU plus LV was used., Conclusions: The efficacy of 5-FU continuous infusion combined with LV and IFN-alpha does not appear to differ significantly from earlier reports on treatment using 5-FU plus LV or 5-FU plus IFN-alpha for patients with colorectal cancer. However, this schedule of 5-FU combined with LV and IFN-alpha produces less toxicity compared with previous trials using bolus 5-FU plus IFN-alpha.

Background: The M-VAC regimen (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) has significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer. Growth factors may provide the possibility of treating patients with higher doses of chemotherapy, for longer periods, with less morbidity, and improved results. A trial of an escalated dosage of M-VAC with recombinant GM-CSF (rhGM-CSF) was initiated., Patients and Methods: 23 patients were treated with an escalated dose of M-VAC every 2 weeks plus rhGM-CSF 250 micrograms/m2 s.c. days 4-10. Dose level I (n = 13) was 1.65 times the dose of standard M-VAC. Adriamycin and cisplatin were given at 2.5 times the dose of standard M-VAC. Dose level II (n = 10) was a relative dose intensity of 1.95. Adriamycin and cisplatin were both given at 2.9 times the dose., Conclusions: The response rate was 70% (95% CI 60%-80%). Seven patients (30%) had CR, and 9 (39%) had a PR. Five (22%) patients had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progression. Of the CR patients, 3 had the CR confirmed pathologically (CRp). Response occurred in 11 patients treated at dose level I and 5 at dose level II. Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Dose level II was too toxic due to thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was minimal. The value of this schedule (dose level I) compared to standard M-VAC will be further evaluated in a randomized trial to be initiated by the Genitourinary Group of the EORTC.

In a patient with diffuse pulmonary metastases of a renal cell carcinoma the development of severe pulmonary hypertension is described after reaching a complete remission during treatment with r-IFN-alpha 2c and rIFN-gamma. Rechallenge with interferon after the discovery of recurrent disease did not lead to deterioration of the cardiopulmonary condition. Possible causative mechanisms are discussed.

Nineteen patients, nine men and 10 women, with advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), were treated with cisplatin either alone or in combination with doxorubicin and bleomycin. Median age was 51 years (range: 32-73 years). Two groups of patients were distinguished: Group 1 (N = 10) received single-agent cisplatin (50-120 mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks) for locoregional recurrence (N = 4), pulmonary metastases (N = 5), or as neoadjuvant therapy (N = 1). Five patients failed previous chemotherapy. No objective responses were observed, five patients showed stabilization of their disease for a median duration of 20 months (range: 3-50 months). Group 2 (N = 9) received a combination of cisplatin (20 mg/m2 IV on days 1-5), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 IV on day 1), and bleomycin (30 mg IV on days 1-5), every 3 weeks. A complete remission (CR) was seen in one patient, lasting for 2 years, a partial remission (PR) in two patients (duration: 6 months and 6 years) (33%), and a stable disease (SD) in five patients (median duration: 15 months; range 3-24 months). One patient showed progression from the start. The observed toxicity was acceptable: dose reduction was required in five patients for myelosuppression or impairment of renal function; vomiting grade III (WHO) was seen in 10 patients. The median progression-free survival was 36 months (range: 7-77 months). Median overall survival was 81 months (range: 14-216 months). The role of cisplatin in this disease remains questionable.

The efficacy and safety of two dose schedules of the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron (Zofran) were studied in 35 patients (group A: 19 patients, group B: 16 patients) previously refractory to standard antiemetics after non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy (greater than 5 emetic episodes). The maintenance of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was further studied in 28 patients (13 A, 15 B) in respectively 36 and 48 retreatment courses. Ondansetron was administered as an 8 mg loading dose (A: 4 mg i.v. + 4 mg orally; B: 8 mg i.v.), followed by oral treatment for 5 days (A: 6-hourly; B: 8 mg 8-hourly). In the first treatment cycle acute emesis was completely controlled in 53% of the patients in group A and in 50% of the patients in group B. Delayed emesis was absent in 75% and 38% of the patients in group A and B respectively. In a second treatment cycle acute antiemetic control was achieved in 54% and 53% of the patients in group A and B respectively. Over the third and fourth subsequent treatments, complete control occurred in 56% and 38% of the patients in group A, and in 46% and 56% of the patients in group B respectively. Delayed emesis did not occur over the following courses in 62%, 89% and 75% of the patients on regimen A, in 57%, 60% and 63% of the patients on regimen B. The observed adverse effects were headache (37%) and constipation (42%). No extrapyramidal reactions were seen. Ondansetron is able to re-establish an acceptable antiemetic control in previously refractory patients on non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, without major toxicity. This efficacy is maintained over the three following retreatment courses.

Ten patients with disseminated testicular cancer were studied during 3 cycles of 20 mg/m2/day x 5 d CDDP combined with bleomycin and vinblastine or etoposide. Five of the patients (= group A) received 0.4 mmol KCl/kg/day and 0.3 mmol MgCl2/kg/day; the other five (= group B) received only KCl intravenously during the CDDP infusions. In group A no decrease of serum and red blood cell Mg concentration was noted. In group B the serum Mg concentration decreased from 0.84 +/- 0.04 mmol/l to 0.57 +/- 0.10 (p less than 0.001) on day 47, to 0.64 +/- 0.08 (p less than 0.005) on day 50 and to 0.72 +/- 0.02 (p less than 0.05) on day 57. The Mg concentration in the red blood cells decreased, but not significantly in group B. Furthermore, the fractional calcium excretion in group B was significantly lower than in group A during the CDDP infusions.

In vitro studies have documented the synergistic antiviral and antiproliferative activity of recombinant interferon alpha (rIFN alpha) and rIFN gamma. Furthermore, rIFN gamma is a strong immunomodulator with optimal effects at a relative low dose (0.1 mg/m2). On the basis of these observations, we began a phase I/II study with the combination of rIFN gamma at 100 micrograms/m2 (2 x 10(6) IU/m2) and rIFN alpha 2c 6 micrograms/m2 (2 x 10(6) IU/m2), injected twice a week subcutaneously. In cases of stable or progressive disease we increased the dose of rIFN alpha 2c every 2 weeks by 6 micrograms/m2 until the maximum tolerated dose was reached. A total of 32 patients with proven progressive renal-cell carcinoma were included. Of the 31 eligible patients, 21 were male and 10 female, their average age was 57.2 years (range 35-72), 28 had had nephrectomy, their median Karnofsky performance status was 90% (70%-100%), and their tumors were localized predominantly to visceral tissue. In 2, response was complete and in 6 it was partial, for a response rate of 25%. The disease had stabilized in 5 patients and progressed in 16. The median duration of partial response was 14 months (8-16 months); of 2 cases of complete response, 1 persists (23+ months), and the other suffered a relapse after 22 months. The median time to response was 24 weeks (18-24 weeks). The maximum tolerated dose of rIFN alpha was 30 micrograms/m2 (range of 6-36 micrograms/m2). Side-effects included those known to be associated with interferon treatment. One patient developed septicemia during a period with grade 4 leukopenia. Our study permits no conclusion regarding the additional value of rIFN gamma.

Thirty-two patients with proven progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with the combination of 0.1 mg/m2 (2 X 10(6) IU/m2) r-interferon (r-IFN)-gamma and 6 micrograms/m2 (2 X 10(6) IU/m2) r-IFN-alpha. In case of progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD), after 8 weeks, the dose of r-IFN-alpha was escalated by 6 micrograms/m2 every 2 weeks until the maximum tolerable dose was reached, while r-IFN-gamma was maintained at the low dose. The rationale for this study is provided by the dose-related efficacy of IFN-alpha as a monotherapy, the potent immunostimulatory activity of IFN-gamma, and the alleged synergistic effect of the combination. Fourteen patients are evaluable for 8 weeks of low-dose combination treatment (7 X SD, 5 X PD, 2 X early progression), while so far 6 of 24 patients (25%) who started dose escalation of IFN-alpha have reached a partial response. These data indicate better efficacy with higher doses of IFN-alpha. Because of the infrequent administration and the relative low doses, compared to other trials, the treatment regimen was well tolerated. Although preliminary results are promising, definite efficacy remains to be proven.

Induction combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and 5-fluorouracil, 1,000 mg/m2/24-h infusion days 1-4, was applied in 76 patients with locally far advanced squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck. The treatment program consisted of 3 cycles of chemotherapy, followed by local radiotherapy and/or surgery. Hematologic side effects were leukocytopenia (50%) and thrombocytopenia (35%). Other side effects included renal toxicity (23%), nausea and/or vomiting (86%), alopecia (18%), and phlebitis (45%). Thirteen patients (17%) achieved a complete remission and 37 patients (49%) a partial remission. Median progression-free and overall survival were 8 and 11 months, respectively. Only patients achieving a complete remission had a better prognosis. Although induction chemotherapy may facilitate further local treatment in about half of the patients, on the basis of presently available data, this procedure should not be routinely applied with the aim of better survival.