Search

Bipolar disorder is a chronic disease that imposes a lifelong burden on those that suffer from it. Lithium is still considered both gold standard treatment and first-line maintenance treatment, and access to treatment with lithium is paramount to improving patient outcomes. However, access to adequate treatment is not only contingent on symptom recognition, accurate diagnosis, and individualization of treatment, but also affected by racial and ethnic disparities at each stage of patient experience. Individuals of African Ancestry with bipolar disorder are more frequently misdiagnosed with non-affective psychoses, less likely to receive minimally adequate treatment or be prescribed lithium, and more likely to be prescribed antipsychotics. To compare prescription patterns in the treatment of bipolar disorder between individuals of African and European Ancestry, we conducted a pooled meta-analysis of four cohorts spanning different clinical settings, recruitment periods, and ascertainment methods, followed by sex-stratified analyses. We found that, overall, individuals of African Ancestry with bipolar disorder were significantly less likely to be prescribed lithium, and more likely to be prescribed first and second-generation antipsychotics during their lifetime, than those of European Ancestry. Furthermore, both men and women of African Ancestry were independently less likely to be prescribed lithium and more likely to be prescribed second generation antipsychotics than men and women of European Ancestry. However, women appeared to be more burdened by the significantly increased likelihood of first-generation antipsychotic prescription than men, for whom the association was marginally non-significant. This continued underutilization of lithium likely stems from the complex interaction of multiple biases., (Copyright © 1964–2025 by MedWorks Media Inc, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved. Printed in the United States.)

Background: Psychiatric disorders differ in their prevalence, symptom profiles, and disease courses in men and women. However, sex differences in psychiatric disorders have not received enough attention to guide treatment recommendations. This systematic review aims to summarize sex differences in the treatment responses and adverse effects of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics transdiagnostically., Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 statement (CRD42020212478). A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus databases. Studies comparing mood stabilizer or antipsychotic treatment outcomes in men and women were included. JBI critical appraisal checklists were used to assess bias risk., Results: Out of 4866 records, 129 reports (14 on mood stabilizers, 115 on antipsychotics) with varying designs were included. Sample sizes ranged from 17 to 22,774 participants (median = 147). The most common psychiatric diagnoses were schizophrenia spectrum (n = 109, 84.5 %) and bipolar disorders (n = 38, 29.5 %). Only four studies explored sex differences in mood stabilizer treatment response. In 40 articles on antipsychotic treatment response, 18 indicated no sex difference, while 16 showed females had better outcomes. Women had more adverse effects with both mood stabilizers and antipsychotics. The risk of bias was low in 84 (65.1 %) of studies., Limitations: Substantial heterogeneity among the studies precluded performing a meta-analysis., Conclusion: Number of studies focusing on sex differences in treatment outcomes of mood stabilizers is limited. Women may respond better to antipsychotics than men, but also experience more side effects. The impact of pharmacokinetics on sex differences warrants more attention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest ME's spouse is an employee of Sanofi. MAF has received grant support from Assurex Health and Mayo Foundation, received CME travel and honoraria from Carnot Laboratories and American Physician Institute, and has Financial Interest / Stock ownership / Royalties from Chymia LLC. All other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)