Search

Studies demonstrated increased obstetric and neonatal complications in women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), but most inadequately addressed confounders and rarely considered antipsychotic effects. We conducted a meta-analysis and a population-based cohort study evaluating associations of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes with SSD and prenatal antipsychotic use. In the meta-analysis, we searched four databases from inception to October-31-2023 and generated pooled risk estimates using random-effect models. In the cohort study, we identified women aged 15-50 years with SSD-diagnosis from electronic-heath-record database of public healthcare-services who delivered first/singleton children between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong. Propensity-score weighted regression-analyses incorporating important confounders including maternal pre-existing and gestational morbidities, substance/alcohol abuse, and psychotropic use, were performed to assess risk of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes in SSD-women versus non-SSD-women, and subsequently treated-SSD and untreated-SSD subgroups to disentangle effects of SSD from antipsychotic exposure. The meta-analysis (studies = 18, women = 37,214,330, including 42,926 SSD-women) found significant associations of SSD with 12 of 17 analyzed negative obstetric/neonatal outcomes (with pooled relative risk ranged:1.12-2.10), including placental complications, induced labor, Caesarean delivery, fetal distress, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, low birth weight, low APGAR scores, neonatal and post-neonatal deaths. However, the cohort study (466,358 women, including 804 SSD-women) revealed that elevated risk of most study outcomes in unadjusted-models were markedly-attenuated or became non-significant in propensity-score weighted adjusted-models, except index-delivery hospitalization ≥7 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 [95% CI = 1.33-2.34]), preterm birth (OR = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.09-2.00]) and neonatal special-care admission (OR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.35-2.01]). Apart from higher neonatal special-care admission in treated-SSD than untreated-SSD women (OR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.23-2.52]), no significant between-group differences emerged in other outcomes. In sum, elevated risk of most obstetric/neonatal complications reported in SSD-women might largely be explained by maternal physical comorbidities, substance/alcohol use disorders and other confounders. Interventions targeting modifiable maternal risk factors should be incorporated in prenatal care for SSD-women to minimize avoidable adverse outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Car dio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. The other authors declare no competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 18-654). All methods adopted by the study were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. As the study was based on a health-record database, the requirement for informed consent was waived. There were no identifiable images from human research participants published in the study and thus no written informed consent for publication of the images would be required., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Previous research examining bipolar-disorder (BD) and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes yielded mixed results, were mostly derived from Western countries and rarely delineated effect between disorder and mood-stabilizers. This population-based study identified women age 15-50 years who delivered first/singleton child in 2003-2018 in Hong Kong, utilizing territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Propensity-score weighted logistic-regression analyses adjusted for confounders were employed to examine risk of adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes associated with BD and mood-stabilizers (lithium, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics). Exploratory unadjusted-analyses were conducted to assess risk for congenital-malformations. Of 465,069 women, 302 had BD-diagnosis, including 168 redeemed ≥ 1 prescription of mood-stabilizers during pregnancy (treated-BD) and 134 gestationally-unexposed to mood-stabilizers (untreated-BD). BD was significantly-associated with increased risk of gestational-diabetes (adjusted-odds-ratio: 1.75 [95 % CI: 1.15-2.70]) and maternal somatic hospitalization ≤ 90 days post-discharge from index-delivery (2.12 [1.19-3.90]). In treatment status-stratified analyses, treated-BD women exhibited significantly-increased rate of gestational-diabetes (2.09 [1.21-3.70]) relative to controls (non-BD and gestationally-unexposed to mood-stabilizers). No significant association of BD or mood-stabilizers with other adverse outcomes was observed. Overall, our findings indicate that BD and mood-stabilizers are not associated with most adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes. Further research clarifying comparative safety of individual mood-stabilizing agents on pregnancy/neonatal outcomes is required., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is growing concern regarding teratogenic effect of antipsychotics. Previous research assessing association between antipsychotics and congenital malformations (CMs) yielded mixed results and were all derived from Western countries. We aimed to examine risk of major and organ/system-specific CMs associated with prenatal antipsychotic exposure in Hong Kong., Methods: This population-based study identified women aged 15-50 years who delivered their first/singleton child between 2003-2018 from public healthcare service database. Propensity score (PS)-weighted logistic-regression analyses were performed to examine risk of CMs following first-trimester exposure to antipsychotic classes (second- and first-generation antipsychotic; SGA and FGA) and six most frequently-prescribed individual antipsychotics., Results: Of 465,069 women, 419 and 420 redeemed ≥1 prescription of SGA and FGA during first-trimester, respectively. Prevalence of any CMs was 4.9% (95%CI:4.9-5.0%) in unexposed-infants, 9.1% (6.7-12.3%) in SGA-exposed infants, and 6.2% (4.3-9.0%) in FGA-exposed infants. SGA exposure (adjusted-odds-ratio: 2.11 [95%CI:1.19-3.86]) was associated with increased risk of CMs. This finding was consistent with sensitivity analyses addressing exposure misclassification and confounding by treatment indication, but not with PS-matched sensitivity analysis. Elevated risk of CMs was observed in infants exposed to high-dose olanzapine (7.50 [1.65-36.13]) and high-dose quetiapine (15.03 [4.86-56.72]), but with wide-CIs. Organ/system-specific malformations were not associated with SGA, FGA or individual antipsychotics., Conclusion: We observed a small increased risk of major malformations associated with SGA, but was not consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses, precluding firm conclusions. Research with large sample size clarifying comparative safety of individual antipsychotics on specific malformations is warranted.

Aims: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders., Methods: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium ( n = 1028), valproate ( n = 3580), olanzapine ( n = 797), quetiapine ( n = 1975) or risperidone ( n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy., Results: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk., Conclusion: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.

Despite growing concern about reproductive safety of antipsychotics, there is a paucity of research specifically assessing prenatal antipsychotic prescribing practices for psychotic disorders. This population-based cohort study identified women aged 15-50 years with diagnosis of psychotic disorders, who delivered their first and singleton child between 2003-2018 in Hong Kong, with an aim to examine temporal trends and predictors of prenatal antipsychotic use as well as antipsychotic utilization patterns before and during pregnancy. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Of 804 women, 519 (65%) redeemed at least one prescription for antipsychotics during pregnancy. Older age at conception (25-34 years: OR 2.12 [95% CI 1.22-3.67]; 35-50 years: 2.52 [1.38-4.61]; 15-24 years as reference category) and antipsychotic treatment within 12 months pre-pregnancy (24.22 [16.23-36.16]) were significantly associated with prenatal antipsychotic use. Second-generation-antipsychotic (SGA) use during pregnancy increased over 16-year study period, while prenatal first-generation-antipsychotic (FGA) use showed declining trend. Overall antipsychotic and SGA use progressively decreased across pre-pregnancy and trimesters of pregnancy. Further analyses on antipsychotic use trajectories revealed that 87.4% (n = 459) of 529 women receiving antipsychotics in 12-month pre-pregnancy redeemed antipsychotic prescription during pregnancy, and 63.4% (n = 333) continued antipsychotic treatment throughout pregnancy. Only 7.5% of the cohort (n = 60) commenced antipsychotics in pregnancy. This is one of the few studies evaluating real-world prenatal antipsychotic utilization among women with psychotic disorders. Future research delineating risk conferred by illness-related factors and antipsychotic exposure on adverse maternal and fetal outcomes is warranted to facilitate treatment guideline development., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Despite growing concern about reproductive safety of psychotropic drugs, there is a paucity of research assessing prenatal prescribing practices for bipolar disorder (BD). This population-based cohort study identified women aged 15-50 years with BD diagnosis, who delivered their first and singleton child between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong, with an aim to examine temporal trends and predictors of prenatal psychotropic drug use as well as drug utilization patterns before and during pregnancy were evaluated. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Of 302 identified women, 202 (66.9%) and 180 (59.6%) redeemed at least 1 prescription for psychotropic drugs in 12 months pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy, respectively. Psychotropic drug treatment (OR = 16.14 [95% CI: 8.79-29.65]) and psychiatric admission (OR = 4.12 [95% CI: 1.66-10.24]) within 12 months pre-pregnancy were associated with prenatal drug use. Second-generation antipsychotic use during pregnancy increased over time, while prenatal use of lithium, anti-epileptics and first-generation-antipsychotics showed declining trend. Use of psychotropic drugs progressively decreased across pre-pregnancy and trimesters of pregnancy. Forty-two (23.3%) women received polypharmacy during pregnancy. Antidepressant use accounted for 17% of all monotherapy episodes. A significant proportion of women exposed to valproate in 12 months pre-pregnancy (27.2%) and first-trimester (16%). In conclusion, our results generally indicate trajectories of reduced psychotropic drug use across pregnancy. Deviations between real-world prescribing patterns and treatment guidelines underscore the need for comprehensive review of current clinical practices. Further research clarifying relationships of prenatal psychotropic drug exposure with maternal and fetal outcomes is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.)