Search

Background Doravirine is the latest NNRTI to be approved for the treatment of HIV-1 and has a different resistance profile from first-generation NNRTIs. Our aim was to investigate the virological efficacy of antiretroviral treatment including doravirine in people living with HIV-1 (PLWHIV), the factors associated with virological failure (VF) and those associated with the emergence of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations in the case of VF. Methods A retrospective national survey of PLWHIV who were either naive or experienced on antiretroviral treatment including doravirine was conducted. VF was defined as two consecutive plasma viral loads (VLs) of ≥50 copies/mL or one VL of ≥200 copies/mL. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted using the Stanford (v9.4.1) and ANRS (v33) algorithms. Results Of the 589 PLWHIV treated with a doravirine-containing regimen, 8.5% were naive and 91.5% had prior antiretroviral experience; 56.9% were infected with HIV-1 B subtype. Overall, 88.3% and 85.1% of participants were virologically controlled at Month (M)3 and M6 of doravirine treatment, respectively. In multivariable analysis, CRF02_AG subtype, higher zenith plasma HIV-1 RNA VL, doravirine initiation in the context of failure and baseline V179D mutation presence were associated with VF. Among 88 PLWHIV who experienced virological failure at M6, 15.9% had a median of 2 (IQR 1–3) HIV RT mutations. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with the occurrence of mutations was a genotypic sensitivity score that was not fully sensitive. Conclusions This study is one of the largest to characterize the virological efficacy of doravirine-containing regimens in clinical practice and to identify factors associated with VF or emergence of resistance mutations that should be considered in clinical management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the routine use of the Sentosa ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) system for HIV-1 polymerase resistance genotyping in treatment-naïve individuals and to analyse the virological response (VR) to first-line antiretroviral treatment.Methods: HIV drug resistance was determined on 237 consecutive samples from treatment-naïve individuals using the Sentosa UDS platform with two mutation detection thresholds (3% and 20%). VR was defined as a plasma HIV-1 virus load <50 copies/mL after 6 months of treatment.Results: Resistance to at least one antiretroviral drug with a mutation threshold of 3% was identified in 29% and 16% of samples according to ANRS and Stanford algorithms, respectively. The ANRS algorithm also revealed reduced susceptibility to at least one protease inhibitor (PI) in 14.3% of samples, to one reverse transcriptase inhibitor in 12.7%, and to one integrase inhibitor (INSTI) in 5.1%. For a mutation threshold of 20%, resistance was identified in 24% and 13% of samples according to ANRS and Stanford algorithms, respectively. The 6 months VR was 87% and was similar in the 58% of patients given INSTI-based treatment, in the 16% given PI-based treatment and in the 9% given NNRTI-based treatment. Multivariate analysis indicated that the VR was correlated with the baseline HIV virus load and resistance to at least one PI at both 3% and 20% mutation detection thresholds (ANRS algorithm).Conclusions: The Vela UDS platform is appropriate for determining antiretroviral resistance in patients on a first-line antiretroviral treatment. Further studies are needed on the use of UDS for therapeutic management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We estimated the prevalence of transmitted-drug-resistance-associated mutations (TDRAMs) in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-1-infected patients.Patients and Methods: TDRAMs were sought in samples from 660 diagnosed HIV-1-infected individuals in 2015/2016 in 33 HIV clinical centres. Weighted analyses, considering the number of patients followed in each centre, were used to derive representative estimates of the percentage of individuals with TDRAMs. Results were compared with those of the 2010/2011 survey (n = 661) using the same methodology.Results: At inclusion, median CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA were 394 and 350/mm3 (P = 0.056) and 4.6 and 4.6 log10 copies/mL (P = 0.360) in the 2010/2011 survey and the 2015/2016 survey, respectively. The frequency of non-B subtypes increased from 42.9% in 2010/2011 to 54.8% in 2015/2016 (P < 0.001), including 23.4% and 30.6% of CRF02_AG (P = 0.004). The prevalence of virus with protease or reverse-transcriptase TDRAMs was 9.0% (95% CI = 6.8-11.2) in 2010/2011 and 10.8% (95% CI = 8.4-13.2) in 2015/2016 (P = 0.269). No significant increase was observed in integrase inhibitor TDRAMs (6.7% versus 9.2%, P = 0.146). Multivariable analysis showed that men infected with the B subtype were the group with the highest risk of being infected with a resistant virus compared with others (adjusted OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.3-3.9).Conclusions: In France in 2015/2016, the overall prevalence of TDRAMs was 10.8% and stable compared with 9.0% in the 2010/2011 survey. Non-B subtypes dramatically increased after 2010. Men infected with B subtype were the group with the highest risk of being infected with a resistant virus, highlighting the need to re-emphasize safe sex messages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance profiles and factors associated with resistance in antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients failing an INSTI-based regimen in clinical practice.Methods: Data were collected from patients failing an INSTI-containing regimen in a multicentre French study between 2014 and 2017. Failure was defined as two consecutive plasma viral loads (VL) >50 copies/mL. Reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase coding regions were sequenced at baseline and failure. INSTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) included in the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA genotypic algorithm were investigated.Results: Among the 674 patients, 359 were failing on raltegravir, 154 on elvitegravir and 161 on dolutegravir therapy. Overall, 90% were experienced patients and 389 (58%) patients showed no INSTI RAMs at failure. The strongest factors associated with emergence of at least one INSTI mutation were high VL at failure (OR = 1.2 per 1 log10 copies/mL increase) and low genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) (OR = 0.08 for GSS ≥3 versus GSS = 0-0.5). Patients failing dolutegravir also had significantly fewer INSTI RAMs at failure than patients failing raltegravir (OR = 0.57, P = 0.02) or elvitegravir (OR = 0.45, P = 0.005). Among the 68 patients failing a first-line regimen, 11/41 (27%) patients on raltegravir, 7/18 (39%) on elvitegravir and 0/9 on dolutegravir had viruses with emergent INSTI RAMs at failure.Conclusions: These results confirmed the robustness of dolutegravir regarding resistance selection in integrase in the case of virological failure in routine clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Minority resistant variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) could influence the virological response to treatment based on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Data on minority rilpivirine-resistant variants are scarce. This study used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify patients harboring minority resistant variants to nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and NNRTIs and to assess their influence on the virological response (VR). Methods. All the subjects, 541 HIV-1--infected patients started a first-line regimen containing rilpivirine. VR was defined as a HIV-1 RNA load <50 copies/mL at month 6 with continued suppression at month 12. NGS was performed at baseline (retrospectively) on the 454 GS-FLX platform (Roche). Results. NGS revealed resistance-associated mutations accounting for 1% to <5% of variants in 17.2% of samples, for 5%-20% in 5.7% of samples, and for >20% in 29% of samples. We identified 43 (8.8%) and 36 (7.4%) patients who harbored rilpivirine-resistant variants with a 1% sensitivity threshold according to the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis and Stanford algorithms, respectively. The VR was 96.9% at month 12. Detection of minority rilpivirine resistant variants was not associated with virological failure (VF). Multivariate analysis indicated that VF at month 12 was associated with a CD4 count <250 cells/µL at baseline, a slower decrease in viral load at month 3, and rilpivirine resistance at baseline using the Stanford algorithm with a 20% threshold. Conclusions. Minority resistant variants had no impact on the VR of treatment-naive patients to a rilpivirine-based regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To track changes in the V3 env region of HIV-1 quasispecies and determine virus coreceptor use in cell reservoirs of patients on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients and methods Ten patients whose plasma viraemia had been suppressed for a median of 5.5 years were followed for 5 years. The V3 env regions of viruses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analysed by ultra-deep sequencing (UDS). HIV-1 tropism was predicted using the geno2pheno 5.75 algorithm and a phenotypic assay. Results The UDS and phenotypic assay data were concordant for predicting HIV-1 tropism. CXCR4-using viruses detected by UDS accounted for 14.7%–76.5% of the virus populations in samples from five patients at enrolment. Five patients harboured pure R5 virus populations and no X4 viruses emerged during the 5 years. The selection pressures estimated by the dN/dS ratio were acting on the V3 region to produce diversification of the quasispecies in CXCR4-infected patients and purification of the quasispecies in R5-infected patients on effective ART. Conclusions UDS showed that the virus quasispecies in cell reservoirs of patients on long-term suppressive ART continued to evolve. CXCR4-using variants became more diversified. Analysis of the selection pressures on the virus quasispecies could provide a clearer picture of virus persistence in patients on effective ART. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "High sensitivity of specific genotypic tools for detection of X4 variants in antiretroviral-experienced patients suitable to be treated with CCR5 antagonists," by E. Seclén and colleagues.