Search

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching the third drug of antiretroviral treatment to maraviroc in aviraemic subjects infected with R5 HIV., Patients and Methods: This is a pilot, prospective, randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT00966329). Eighty HIV-1-infected aviraemic adults on stable antiretroviral treatment for ≥1 year and no antiretroviral drug resistance were screened for the presence of non-R5 HIV by triplicate proviral V3 population sequencing. From them, 30 subjects with R5 HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to switch the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to maraviroc (n = 15) or to continue the same antiretroviral treatment (controls, n = 15). The principal endpoint was the proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48. Ultrasensitive proviral HIV-1 tropism testing (454 sequencing) was performed retrospectively at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48., Results: One subject in the maraviroc arm and one control had non-R5 HIV in proviral DNA by retrospective 454 sequencing. The subject receiving maraviroc was the only individual to develop virological failure. However, plasma HIV at failure was R5. Switching to maraviroc was well tolerated and associated with small, but statistically significant, declines in total, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Median (IQR) triglyceride [1 (0.67-1.22) versus 1.6 (1.4-3.1) mmol/L, P = 0.003] and total cholesterol [4.3 (4.1-4.72) versus 5.4 (4-5.7) mmol/L, P = 0.059] values were lower in the maraviroc arm than in controls at week 48., Conclusions: In this pilot, prospective, randomized clinical trial, switching the third drug to maraviroc was safe, efficacious and improved lipid parameters.

While human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 chemokine co-receptors 5 tropism and the GWGR motif in the envelope third variable region (V3 loop) have been associated with a slower disease progression, their influence on antiretroviral response remains unclear. The impact of baseline V3 characteristics on treatment response was evaluated in a randomised, double blind, prospective cohort study with patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir or efavirenz plus azithothymidine/3TC (1:1) over 48 weeks. Similar virological and immunological responses were observed for both treatment regimens. The 43 individuals had a mean baseline CD4 T cell count of 119 cells/mm(3) [standard deviation (SD) = 99] and a mean viral load of 5.09 log(10) copies/mL (SD = 0.49). The GWGR motif was not associated with a CD4 T cell response, but predicted R5 tropism by the geno2pheno([clinical20%]) algorithm correlated with higher CD4 T cell levels at all monitoring points (p < 0.05). Moreover, higher false-positive rates (FPR) values from this analysis revealed a strong correlation with CD4 T cell recovery (p < 0.0001). Transmitted drug resistance mutations, documented in 3/41 (7.3%) cases, were unrelated to the assigned antiretroviral regimen and had no impact on patient outcomes. In conclusion, naÏve HIV-1 R5 infected patients exhibited higher CD4 T cell counts at baseline; this difference was sustained throughout therapy. The geno2pheno([clinical]) option FPR positively correlated with CD4 T cell gain and may be useful in predicting CD4 T cell recovery.

Disease progression during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection has been associated with a switch of viral coreceptor usage from CCR5 to CXCR4. The current study investigates the effect of anti retroviral therapy (ART) on the viral tropism in a group of patients based on the V3 loop sequence, in ART naïve patients prior to and 24 weeks after ART. Genomic DNA was extracted from the PBMCs of these patients, and the C2-V5 region of the HIV-1 env genes were cloned and sequenced. The coreceptor usage was predicated based on V3 loop amino acid sequences using Geno2pheno and PSSM programs. Our results indicate that following ART, the plasma viral loads of both CXCR4 and CCR5 viruses were significantly decreased. We observed a relatively higher ratio of R5 than X4 virus after 24 weeks of ART and both the positive charges and the net charges of the V3 regions were decreased significantly (p < 0.05) after ART. We conclude that ART significantly, reduced both X4 and R5 viruses with a preferential suppression of X4 virus. These data will help improve prognostic outcomes and help clinicians determine the course of treatment in patients who exhibit virologic failure while taking a CCR5 antagonist.

Objectives: The use of maraviroc as part of a simplification of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is hampered by the difficulty of assessing viral tropism in patients with undetectable viraemia. In this context, information on tropism might be obtained from testing either older stored viraemic sera collected before initiation of ART or current proviral DNA in peripheral blood cells., Methods: HIV-1-infected individuals who had initiated ART and had undetectable viraemia for >2 years were identified. V3 genotyping was performed in parallel from plasma HIV-RNA and proviral DNA before starting ART and from proviral DNA while on suppressive ART. Viral tropism was interpreted using geno2pheno (false positive rate = 10%) and an optimized version of position specific scoring matrices (PSSM) with a greater sensitivity to detect X4 variants (PSSM(X4/R5-8))., Results: A total of 78 HIV-1 infected individuals were examined. Mean time under suppressive ART was 3.5 years (interquartile range: 2.3-4.4). The rate of X4 variants in plasma and proviral DNA samples at baseline was 32.8% and 34.0%, respectively. It was 33.9% after >2 years of suppressive ART in DNA samples. Paired RNA/DNA tropism results at baseline could be obtained for 38 patients, with an overall 82% concordance. After >2 years of suppressed plasma viraemia, HIV tropism was re-assessed in proviral DNA; tropism switches were uncommon, especially comparing baseline and most recent DNA longitudinal specimens (12%)., Conclusions: HIV tropism switches over time under suppressive ART are rare. There is a relatively good correlation between RNA and DNA tropism estimations using genotypic tests. Thus, HIV-1 tropism might confidently be examined either in older stored viraemic plasma specimens or in current proviral DNA samples.

The influence of antiretroviral therapy on co-receptor tropism remains controversial. To verify if co-receptor tropism shift was affected by HAART, the evolution of proviral DNA V3 genotype after 12 months of a new antiretroviral regimen was compared between responder and non-responder patients. Baseline blood samples were collected from 36 patients infected with HIV-1 subtype-B (18 naïve and 18 experienced) for virus isolation and env V3 genotyping from plasma HIV-1 RNA and PBMC DNA. DNA V3 genotyping was repeated after 12 months from initiating HAART. WebPSSM was used for categorizing V3 sequences into X4 or R5; for analysis purposes, dual/mixed viruses were considered as X4. From the 10 (28%) patients changing their proviral DNA V3 genotype during therapy, six shifted from R5-to-X4 and four from X4-to-R5. The lack of reaching virological suppression was not associated with an X4-to-R5 (P = 0.25) or R5-to-X4 (P = 0.14) shift; time-to-viral suppression and CD4 increase were similar in both groups. No association was found between tropism shift and patient baseline characteristics including age, sex, CDC stage, CD4 count, viral load, exposure and length of previous HAART, enfuvirtide use in the new regimen, number of reverse transcriptase and protease resistance-associated mutations. Conversely, CD4 nadir was correlated to emergence of X4 virus in proviral DNA (mean 27.2 +/- 30.6 in R5-to-X4 shifting patients vs. 161.6 +/- 150.6 in non-shifting patients, P = 0.02). The occurrence of a tropism shift in both directions was independent of HAART use, irrespective of its efficacy. The CD4 count nadir was the only baseline characteristic able to predict an R5-to-X4 viral shift., ((c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)