Search

Objective: We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission., Methods: This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression., Results: Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4)., Conclusion: The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy., (© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To assess, in patients with recent-onset arthritis, whether a self-reported familial occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a clinical presentation of the disease, final diagnosis, long-term outcome and treatment decisions., Methods: The study was conducted from data of patients included between 2002 and 2005 in the early arthritis ESPOIR cohort. Patients were recruited on the basis of having at least two swollen joints for >6 weeks and <6 months, no other diagnosis than RA and no previous exposure to glucocorticoids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients were stratified into two groups according to the presence of a self-reported familial occurrence of RA at baseline. Data concerning final diagnosis (2-year visit), long-term outcome (5-year visit) and therapeutic decisions were compared between the 2 groups of patients, using logistic and Cox regression models., Results: At baseline, 115 patients (14.1%) reported a familial occurrence of RA and showed, as compared with the remaining participants, higher prevalence of extra articular manifestations (EAMs) (51.8% vs. 39.6%, p=0.01) and severe EAMs (7.9% vs. 3.1%, p 0.01). Both unadjusted (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.1-2.21; p = 0.01) and adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06-2.15; p=0.02) identified a higher probability for the initiation of a targeted DMARD over time among patients with a self-reported familial occurrence of RA., Conclusions: In the specific context of early arthritis, a self-reported familial occurrence of RA is associated with the future decision to initiate a targeted DMARD.

Background: To validate the ability of PROS (vitamin K-dependent protein S) and CO7 (complement component C7) to predict response to the methotrexate (MTX)/etanercept (ETA) combination in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who received this therapeutic combination in a well-documented cohort., Method: From the ESPOIR cohort, RA patients having received the MTX/ETA or MTX/adalimumab (ADA) combination as a first-line biologic treatment were included. Serum concentrations of PROS and CO7 were measured by ELISA prior to the initiation of ETA or ADA, at a time where the disease was active (DAS28 ESR > 3.2). The clinical efficacy (response/non-response) of both combinations has been evaluated after at least 6 months of treatment, according to the EULAR response criteria with some modifications., Results: Thirty-two were treated by MTX/ETA; the numbers of responders and non-responders were 24 and 8, respectively. Thirty-three patients received the MTX/ADA combination; 27 and 5 patients were respectively responders and non-responders. While there were no differences for demographic, clinical, biological, and X-rays data, as well as for CO7, serum levels of PROS tended to be significantly higher in responders to the MTX/ETA combination (p = 0.08) while no difference was observed in the group receiving MTX/ADA. For PROS, the best concentration threshold to differentiate both groups was calculated at 40 μg/ml using ROC curve. The theranostic performances of PROS appeared better for the ETA/MTX combination. When considering the response to this combination, analysis of pooled data from ESPOIR and SATRAPE (initially used to validate PROS and CO7 as potential theranostic biomarkers) cohorts led to a higher theranostic value of PROS that became significant (p = 0.009)., Conclusion: PROS might be one candidate of a combination of biomarkers capable of predicting the response to MTX/ETA combination in RA patients refractory to MTX., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03666091 and NCT00234234 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To report the 10-year outcome of an inception cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the ESPOIR cohort, and predictors of outcome., Methods: From 2003 to 2005, 813 patients were included if they had early arthritis (<6 months) with a high probability of RA and had never been prescribed DMARDs. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome., Results: In total, 521 (64.1%) RA patients were followed up for 10 years; 35 (4.3%) died, which appears to be similar to the French general population. Overall, 480 (92.1%) patients received a DMARD; 174 (33.4%) received at least one biologic DMARD, 13.6% within 2 years. At year 10, 273 (52.4%) patients were in DAS28 remission, 40.1% in sustained remission, 14.1% in drug-free remission, 39.7% in CDAI remission. Half of the patients achieved a health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) < 0.5. SF-36 physical component and pain were well controlled. Structural progression was weak, with a mean change from baseline in modified Sharp score of 11.0  (17.9). Only 34 (6.5%) patients required major joint surgery. A substantial number of patients showed new comorbidities over 10 years. Positivity for anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA) was confirmed as a robust predictor of long-term outcome., Conclusions: We report a very mild 10-year outcome of a large cohort of patients with early RA diagnosed in the early 2000s, which was much better than results for a previous cohort of patients who were recruited in 1993. This current favourable outcome may be related to more intensive care for real-life patients., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Antirheumatic disease therapies have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the current evidence., Methods: A search of published and preprint databases in all languages was performed. Included studies described ≥1 relevant clinical outcome for ≥5 patients who were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and were treated with antirheumatic disease therapy between January 1, 2019 and May 29, 2020. Pairs of reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A meta-analysis of effect sizes using random-effects models was performed when possible., Results: The search identified 3,935 articles, of which 45 were included (4 randomized controlled trials, 29 cohort studies, and 12 case series). All studies evaluated hospitalized patients, and 29 of the 45 studies had been published in a peer-reviewed journal. In a meta-analysis of 3 cohort studies with a low risk of bias, hydroxychloroquine use was not significantly associated with mortality (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.41 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83, 2.42]). In a meta-analysis of 2 cohort studies with some concerns/higher risk of bias, anakinra use was associated with lower mortality (pooled HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.12, 0.52]). Evidence was inconclusive with regard to other antirheumatic disease therapies, and the majority of other studies had a high risk of bias., Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, hydroxychloroquine use was not associated with benefit or harm regarding COVID-19 mortality. The evidence supporting the effect of other antirheumatic disease therapies in COVID-19 is currently inconclusive., (© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To evaluate the association of baseline serum level of vitamin D with disease activity, disability, and radiographic damage over the first year in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Among early arthritis patients included in the ESPOIR cohort, patients with early RA were evaluated. Levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D2 and D3 were measured at baseline. Baseline associations between vitamin D level and 28-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS) were assessed. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the association between vitamin D level and radiographic progression (mTSS increased by ≥ 1 point) or disability (HAQ-DI ≥ 0.5) over 12 months. Forward stepwise multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association of baseline variables and outcomes., Results: Among 813 patients with early arthritis, data for 645 patients with RA were analyzed. Vitamin D level was < 10 ng/mL (deficiency, group 1), 10-29.9 ng/mL (low level, group 2), and ≥ 30 ng/mL (normal, group 3) for 114 (17.7%), 415 (64.54%), and 114 (17.7%) patients, respectively. At baseline, DAS28-ESR and HAQ-DI were higher with vitamin D deficiency compared with groups 2 and 3 combined ( P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively), as was mean mTSS, but not significantly (p = 0.076). On multivariate analysis, baseline vitamin D deficiency was associated with HAQ-DI at 6 months (OR 1.70) and mTSS at 12 months (OR 1.76)., Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency was associated with more active and severe disease at baseline and may predict disability and radiographic progression over 1 year in early RA patients. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03666091].

Background: Rheumatologists must contend with COVID-19 pandemic in the management of their patients and many questions have been raised on the use of both anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). The French Society of Rheumatology (SFR) selected the most critical ones to the daily practice of a rheumatologist and a group of 10 experts from SFR and Club Rheumatism and Inflammation (CRI) boards proposed responses based on the current knowledge of May 2020., Methods: Following the availability of the first 18 questions and statements, 1400 individuals consulted the frequently asked questions between the March 31, 2020 and April 12, 2020. As a result, 16 additional questions were forwarded to the SFR, and answered by the board. An additional round of review by email and video conference was organized, which included updates of the previous statements. The scientific relevance of 5 of the questions led to their inclusion in this document. Each response received a final assessment on a scale of 0-10 with 0 meaning no agreement whatsoever and 10 being in complete agreement. The mean values of these votes for each question are presented as the levels of agreement (LoA) at the end of each response. This document was last updated on April 17, 2020., Results: Based on current scientific literature already published, in most circumstances, there is no contraindication to the initiation or continuation of anti-inflammatory drugs as well as DMARDs. If signs suggestive of infection (coronavirus or other) occur, treatments should be discontinued and resumed, if necessary, after 2 weeks without any symptoms. Only, some signals suggest that people taking an immunosuppressive dose of corticosteroid therapy are at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. Intra-articular injections of glucocorticoids are allowed when there is no reasonable therapeutic alternative, and providing that precautions to protect the patient and the practitioner from viral contamination are adopted, included appropriate information to the patient., Conclusions: Currently available data on managing patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic are reassuring and support continuing or initiating symptomatic as well as specific treatments of these diseases, the main target of their management remaining their appropriate control, even during this pandemic., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies suggested that obesity could negatively affect the response to antitumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) agents in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data are lacking on whether obesity affects the response to abatacept (ABA). We aimed to determine whether body mass index (BMI) affects the response to ABA in RA., Materials and Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we included RA patients who received ABA. BMI was calculated at the initiation of treatment. After 6 months of treatment, change from baseline in DAS28, pain on a visual analog scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, tender and swollen joint count were analysed. The primary endpoint was decrease in DAS28 ≥ 1·2. Secondary outcomes were good response and remission by EULAR criteria., Results: At baseline, among 141 RA patients included, the median [interquartile range] BMI was 26·0 [22·9-30·8] kg/m². The number of patients with normal weight, overweight and obesity was 64 (45·4%), 38 (27%) and 39 (27·6%), respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the three BMI subgroups. Univariate analysis revealed no difference in BMI between responders and nonresponders: DAS28 decrease ≥ 1·2 (25·0 [23·4-31·3] vs. 26·3 [22·9-30·2], P = 0·95), EULAR good response (26·4 [23·5-30·9] vs. 26·0 [22·9-30·6], P = 0·96) and remission (26·7 [21·7-30·3] vs. 26·0 [23·0-30·1], P = 0·83)., Conclusion: In our real-life study, BMI did not affect the response to ABA in RA. If confirmed, these results suggest that obesity is not a limitation of ABA use in RA., (© 2016 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.)

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a Treat-to-Target strategy with certolizumab pegol in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the context of a pay-for-performance agreement in which medication costs are refunded in case of discontinuation during the first 3 months of treatment., Methods: The Treat-to-Target strategy consisted of a systematic switch to second-line tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α inhibitor in case of an unmet ACR50 response at 3 months compared to current routine clinical practice. A reference cohort treated first-line with certolizumab pegol according to current practice without systematic switching was considered as the comparator. A decision-tree model was constructed to estimate clinical outcome (health assessment questionnaire-disability index or HAQ-DI score), time spent in ACR50 response (ACR 50), and direct costs of treatment over a 2-year period. HAQ scores were derived from American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) responses. All TNFα inhibitors were assumed to have equivalent efficacy and tolerability. Costs were estimated at 2013 French retail prices (date of the pay-for-performance agreement)., Results: The mean duration of an ACR50 response was 1.23 years in the Treat-to-Target strategy certolizumab pegol cohort vs 0.98 years in the reference cohort, resulting in a mean gain in HAQ at 24 months of 0.117. The Treat-to-Target strategy with a mix of TNFα inhibitors as second-line therapy was more expensive than the reference strategy in absolute terms, but this difference was entirely offset by the pay-for-performance agreement. The Treat-to-Target strategy was, thus, cost-neutral over a 2-year period after the payback of CZP cost for patients not achieving the target at 3 months., Conclusions: In the context of a pay-for-performance agreement, the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a Treat-to-Target strategy with certolizumab pegol in first line is dominant compared to standard use of this drug in the French setting in 2013.

The disabling and painful disease osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. Strong evidence suggests that a subpopulation of OA patients has a form of OA driven by inflammation. Consequently, understanding when inflammation is the driver of disease progression and which OA patients might benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment is a topic of intense research in the OA field. We have reviewed the current literature on OA, with an emphasis on inflammation in OA, biochemical markers of structural damage, and anti-inflammatory treatments for OA. The literature suggests that the OA patient population is diverse, consisting of several subpopulations, including one associated with inflammation. This inflammatory subpopulation may be identified by a combination of novel serological inflammatory biomarkers. Preliminary evidence from small clinical studies suggests that this subpopulation may benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment currently reserved for other inflammatory arthritides.

Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at an increased risk of developing comorbid conditions. A close monitoring of the disease targeting a status of low disease activity is associated with a better outcome. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the impact of a nurse-led programme on comorbidities and the impact of patient self-assessment of disease activity on the management of RA., Methods: We enrolled 970 patients (mean age 58 years, 79% women) in a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, 6-month trial. In the comorbidity group (n=482), the nurse checked comorbidities and sent the programme results to the attending physicians. In the self-assessment group (n=488), the nurse taught the patient how to calculate his/her Disease Activity Score which had to be reported on a booklet to be shared with the treating rheumatologist. The number of measures taken for comorbidities and the percentage of patients recording a change (initiation, switch or increased dose) in disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the 6 months follow-up period of the study defined the outcomes of the trial., Results: The number of measures taken per patient was statistically higher in the comorbidity group: 4.54±2.08 versus 2.65±1.57 (p<0.001); incidence rate ratio: 1.78 (1.61-1.96) and DMARD therapy was changed more frequently in the self-assessment group: 17.2% versus 10.9% (OR=1.70 (1.17; 2.49), p=0.006)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the short-term benefit of a nurse-led programme on RA comorbidity management and the impact of patient self-assessment of disease activity on RA treatment intensification., Trial Registration Number: NCT #01315652., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objectives: This 52-week, randomised, double-blind phase IIIb study assessed efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) as add-on therapy to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low to moderate disease activity, and stopping therapy in patients in sustained remission., Methods: Patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP (400 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo (every 2 weeks) plus current non-biologic DMARDs. At week 24, patients who achieved the primary endpoint of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at both weeks 20 and 24 stopped study treatment and continued in the study until week 52., Results: Of 194 patients (CZP=96; placebo=98), >90% had moderate disease activity at baseline. Significantly more CZP patients met the primary endpoint than placebo patients (week 20 and 24 CDAI remission rates: 18.8% vs 6.1%; p≤0.05). At week 24, 63.0% vs 29.7% of CZP versus placebo patients (p<0.001) achieved LDA. Disease activity score (ESR) based on 28-joint count and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission rates were also significantly higher with CZP versus placebo (19.8% vs 3.1%; p≤0.01 and 14.6% vs 4.1%; p≤0.05). CZP patients reported improvements in physical function versus placebo (mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability-Index change from baseline: CZP, -0.25 vs placebo, -0.03; p≤0.01). During the period following withdrawal of CZP or placebo, only 3/17 prior CZP patients and 2/6 prior placebo patients maintained CDAI remission until week 52, but CZP reinstitution allowed renewed improvement. Adverse and serious adverse event rates were comparable between CZP and placebo groups., Conclusions: Addition of CZP to non-biologic DMARDs is an effective treatment in RA patients with predominantly moderate disease activity, allowing low-disease activity or remission to be reached in a majority of the patients. However, the data suggest that CZP cannot be withdrawn in patients achieving remission., Trial Registration Number: NCT00674362., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Introduction: In clinical practice, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly discontinued after response to biologic therapy is achieved in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but the impact of NSAID discontinuation has not been assessed in prospective controlled trials. The aim of the SPARSE study was to evaluate the effects of the anti-tumor necrosis factor agent etanercept on NSAID intake and conventional clinical outcomes in axSpA patients., Methods: In the double-blind, placebo-controlled period, patients with active (mini Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥4) axSpA despite optimal NSAID intake were randomized to receive etanercept 50 mg or placebo once weekly for 8 weeks. All patients were advised to taper/discontinue their NSAID intake during the treatment period. NSAID intake was self-reported by diary and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID scores calculated based on ASAS recommendations. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in ASAS-NSAID score (analysis of covariance)., Results: In 90 randomized patients at baseline, mean age (standard deviation) was 38.9 (11.8) years; disease duration, 5.7 (8.1) years; 59/90 (66%) were human leukocyte antigen-B27 positive; 51/90 (57%) had radiographic sacroiliitis; and 45/90 (50%) were magnetic resonance imaging sacroiliitis-positive. Mean ASAS-NSAID scores were similar between etanercept and placebo groups at baseline (98.2 (39.0) versus 93.0 (23.4)), as were BASDAI (6.0 (1.7) versus 5.9 (1.5)), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (5.2 (2.1) versus 5.1 (2.2)). Mean changes (SE) in ASAS-NSAID score from baseline to week 8 were -63.9 (6.1) and -36.6 (5.9) in the etanercept and placebo groups (between-group difference, -27.3; P = 0.002). Significantly higher proportions of patients receiving etanercept versus placebo had an ASAS-NSAID score <10 (46% versus 17%; P = 0.008) and ASAS-NSAID score of 0 (41% versus 14%; P = 0.013) at this time point. Significantly more patients in the etanercept versus placebo group achieved BASDAI50 (39% versus 18%; P = 0.032) and ASAS40 (44% versus 21%; P = 0.028) at week 8., Conclusions: In patients with axSpA, etanercept was associated with clinically relevant NSAID-sparing effects in addition to significant improvements in conventional clinical outcomes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01298531. Registered 16 February 2011.

Objective: To report the 5-year outcome of a large prospective cohort of patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify factors predictive of outcome., Methods: Patients were recruited if they had early arthritis of < 6 months' duration, had a high probability of developing RA, and had never been prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) or steroids. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors that predict outcome., Results: We included 813 patients from December 2002 to April 2005. Age was 48.1 ± 12.6 years, delay before referral 103.1 ± 52.4 days, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) 5.1 ± 1.3, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) 1.0 ± 0.7; 45.8% and 38.7% had rheumatoid factor or antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), respectively; 22% had hand or foot erosions; 78.5% fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for RA at baseline and 93.8% during followup. At 5 years, 573 patients were evaluated. The outcome was mild for most patients: disease activity (median DAS28 = 2.5) and HAQ disability (median 0.3) were well controlled over time; 50.6% achieved DAS28 remission and 64.7% low disease activity. Radiographic progression was low (2.9 Sharp unit/year) and only a few patients required joint surgery. Nevertheless, some patients developed new comorbidities. During the 5 years, 82.7% of patients had received at least 1 DMARD (methotrexate, 65.9%), 18.3% a biological DMARD, and about 60% prednisone at least once. Anti-CCP was the best predictor of remaining in the cohort for 5 years, of prescription of synthetic or biologic DMARD, and of radiographic progression., Conclusion: The 5-year outcome of an early RA cohort in the 2000s was described. Anti-CCP was a robust predictor of outcome. The generally good 5-year outcome could be related to early referral and early effective treatment, key processes in the management of early RA in daily practice.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in several subsets of spondyloarthritis (SpA) using the data of the AIR (Autoimmunity and Rituximab) registry., Methods: All patients receiving RTX for SpA, and prospectively included in the AIR registry from September 2005 to September 2010, were retrospectively analyzed. The response to treatment was evaluated by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index for axial disease, joint count for peripheral disease, and C-reactive protein reduction., Results: Among the 595 patients included in the AIR registry, 26 patients with SpA from 13 centers were reported: ankylosing spondylitis (10), undifferentiated SpA (7), and psoriatic arthritis (9). Mean disease duration was 8.8 years (range 1-40). The extraarticular features found were psoriasis, 12 cases; uveitis, 4 cases; and Crohn's disease, 3 cases. The mean number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs before RTX was 2.4; previous anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents were taken in 23 cases. The mean number of RTX courses was 1.5 (range 1-5), with a total of 35.6 patient-years. Efficacy was noted in 11/23 cases: 3 out of 3 anti-TNF-naive patients and 8 out of 20 anti-TNF nonresponder patients. No predictive factors of response could be identified, particularly in diagnosis subsets or clinical presentation (axial or peripheral)., Conclusion: In this nationwide study of several subsets of SpA, RTX had only a moderate efficacy that was more marked in patients who were anti-TNF-naive.

Objectives: To assess the effect of biotherapies vs placebo on fatigue in two situations: inadequate response to conventional treatments (IR-DMARD) and inadequate response to anti-TNF (IR-anti-TNF) in RA., Methods: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of biotherapies vs placebo on fatigue, in combination with DMARDs. Fatigue was measured using the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) or short-form 36 (SF-36) vitality scores at baseline and at Week 24. The results were in effect size (ES) for each biotherapy (or class of biotherapy) vs placebo. An ES of <0.5 was considered as small, between 0.5 and 0.8 as moderate and >0.8 as important., Results: From the 763 published studies, 10 RCTs were included in the analysis: seven involved IR-DMARD RA and three IR-anti-TNF. Among the 3837 included patients with established RA, 1227 patients were treated with an anti-TNF, 420 with rituximab, 258 with abatacept, 205 with tocilizumab and 1727 received placebo. The overall ESs of all biotherapies vs placebo on fatigue were small (ES = 0.45; 95% CI 0.31, 0.58) as well as for anti-TNFs (ES = 0.36; 95% CI 0.21, 0.51). The ESs were small in IR-DMARD RA (ES = 0.38; 95% CI 0.30, 0.46), similar between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF agents and moderate in IR-anti-TNF RA (ES = 0.57; 95% CI 0.27, 0.86)., Conclusion: Few studies reported the impact of biotherapies on fatigue. The effect of biotherapies on fatigue in RA is small.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with that of other anticytokine agents indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with identical therapeutic indication (anti-tumor necrosis factor-α, anti-interleukin 1 or 6), with the objective of determining the noninferiority of CZP., Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of anticytokine agents in combination with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) after 6 months of treatment, using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, in patients with RA who have shown inadequate response to DMARD including methotrexate. Indirect treatment comparisons were carried out by a multiple-treatment Bayesian random-effects metaanalysis. Data were analyzed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Noninferiority of CZP was assessed in comparison with a predefined equivalence margin of 5%., Results: Nineteen placebo-controlled studies were identified: 14 evaluated the efficacy of 5 anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, CZP) and 5 evaluated efficacy of 2 anti-interleukin agents (anakinra, tocilizumab). Every treatment showed significant efficacy versus placebo in individual studies. The multiple-treatment metaanalysis showed a highest OR for CZP on ACR20 response. Metaanalysis indicates that the efficacy of CZP according to ACR20 response is superior to that of infliximab, adalimumab, and anakinra, and equivalent or superior to that of etanercept, golimumab, and tocilizumab. According to ACR50 response, the efficacy of CZP is equivalent or superior to that of all other anticytokines., Conclusion: Results of this original multiple-treatment Bayesian metaanalysis indicate that certolizumab pegol is at least as efficacious as the preexisting antirheumatic anticytokine biotherapies.

A systematic review of the clinical trials in osteoarthritis registered on the public website of the Clinical Trials Data Bank at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been performed. Such a review should cover the majority of the ongoing or forthcoming trials in the disease. This review focusses on trials designed to test safety and/or efficacy of targeted therapies in osteoarthritis., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In early and active RA despite MTX, continuous treatment with TNF blockers in combination with MTX is recommended. To compare this strategy with an initial combination of MTX and adalimumab (ADA) given for 3 months and then adjusted based on the disease activity status., Methods: Prospective unblinded randomized multicentre controlled 1-year trial in which 65 patients with early (<6 months) and active [disease activity score (DAS28(ESR)) >5.1] RA were assigned to Group 1 (32 patients): MTX (0.3 mg/kg/week, maximum of 20 mg/week, without escalating dose regimen) or to Group 2 (33 patients): initial combination therapy with MTX (as in Group 1) and ADA (40 mg eow). In both groups, treatment was adjusted every 3 months. The aim was to achieve a low DAS (DAS28(ESR) <3.2)., Results: From Week 12 until Week 52, seven patients in Group 1 and 11 patients in Group 2 remained in low disease activity state while receiving MTX monotherapy (P = 0.28). The 1-year area under the curve (AUC) of DAS28 was lower in Group 2 owing to an initial better response. The total intake of anti-TNF-alpha and the mean increase in total modified Sharp score was similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Initial combination of MTX and ADA and then an adjusted based on the disease activity status achieved a faster control of disease activity but did not increase the number of patients for whom anti-TNF-alpha treatment was not needed after 12 weeks nor a better subsequent clinical or radiological outcome than a 3-month delayed initiation of anti-TNF in patients with still active disease despite MTX.

Objective: Because anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) has emerged as a highly effective treatment for numerous inflammatory arthritides, which are a common cause of AA amyloidosis, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of anti-TNF in a nationwide study., Methods: The rheumatology departments of all French teaching hospitals were contacted by mail to obtain the files of patients with histologically proven secondary AA amyloidosis and renal involvement who were treated with anti-TNF. Efficacy was assessed as a sustained decrease in 24-hour proteinuria and a stable/improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR)., Results: Among the 15 patients studied, the 24-hour proteinuria was 4.5 +/- 3.6 gm (mean +/- SD), creatininemia was 178.4 +/- 74.9 micromoles/liter, and GFR was 46 +/- 23 ml/minute before starting anti-TNF. Ten patients received infliximab, 4 received etanercept, and 1 received both types of treatment. The mean followup was 10.4 months. No severe adverse events were recorded; one episode of herpes zoster in the first branch of the trigeminal nerve occurred after one infusion of infliximab. Amyloidosis progressed in 7 patients and was stabilized in 5 patients. Three patients (receiving infliximab alone, infliximab plus methotrexate [MTX], or etanercept plus MTX) experienced rapid, dramatic, and sustained decreases in proteinuria (>or=80%), with the GFR increasing 15-78%., Conclusion: Anti-TNF was well-tolerated and safe in the 15 patients with AA amyloidosis and renal involvement. The pathogenic role of TNF in AA amyloidosis, the sustained proteinuria decrease in 3 patients, and the stabilization of renal parameters in 5 other patients make anti-TNF a promising candidate to treat AA amyloidosis secondary to inflammatory arthritides.