Search

Objectives: To characterize the effect of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (UPA15) on enthesitis in patients with PsA from the SELECT-PsA Phase 3 trials., Methods: Patients with an inadequate response/intolerance to one or more non-biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 1) or one or more biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2) received UPA15, adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo (weeks 0-24) switched to UPA15 (week 24 onward). The Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index were used to assess improvement in enthesitis, enthesitis resolution, maintenance of enthesitis resolution and protection from enthesitis development through week 56., Results: Data from 639 patients receiving UPA15 and 635 patients receiving placebo (including 317 patients who switched from placebo to UPA15) were analysed. UPA15 led to higher rates of enthesitis resolution vs placebo at week 24 (LEI: 59.8% vs 38.0%; SPARCC index: 50.6% vs 31.5%, respectively) and greater improvements in the LEI (-1.7 vs -1.0) and SPARCC index (-3.4 vs -1.9); improvements were maintained through week 56. Improvements were observed after 12 weeks of UPA15 treatment. Over 90% of patients without enthesitis (LEI = 0) at baseline receiving UPA15 were enthesitis-free at week 56, and UPA15 prevented recurrence of enthesitis at week 56 in >80% of patients with enthesitis at baseline who achieved resolution (LEI = 0) at week 24., Conclusions: UPA15 is associated with a comprehensive improvement in enthesitis, with improvements observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, treatment with UPA15 was associated with maintaining an enthesitis-free state after resolution and protection against new-onset enthesitis., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03104400 (SELECT-PsA 1) and NCT03104374 (SELECT-PsA 2)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Introduction: Pulmonary involvement is one of the most common extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and tenderness. All lung compartments can be interested in the course of RA, including parenchyma, airways, and, more rarely, pleura and vasculature., Areas Covered: The aim of this paper is to review the main RA lung manifestations, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical and therapeutic issues of RA-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite an increasing number of studies in the last years, pathogenesis of RA-ILD remains largely debated and the treatment of RA patients with lung involvement is still challenging in these patients., Expert Opinion: Management of RA-ILD is largely based on expert-opinion. Due to the broad clinical manifestations, including both joints and pulmonary involvement, multidisciplinary discussion, including rheumatologist and pulmonologist, is essential, not only for diagnosis, but also to evaluate the best therapeutic approach and follow-up. In fact, the coexistence of different lung manifestations may influence the treatment response and safety. The identification of biomarkers and risk-factors for an early identification of RA patients at risk of developing ILD remains a need that still needs to be fulfilled, and that will require further investigation in the next years.

Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a rheumatic disorder that may be responsible for relevant articular impairment. The recently licensed Janus Kinase (JaK) inhibitors represent a new opportunity to improve PsA treatment. This review deals with the clinical usefulness of the selective JaK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) in patients with PsA., Covered Areas: Two phase-III studies are available: SELECT-PsA 1, performed in patients with an inadequate response to non-biological therapies, and SELECT-PsA 2, conducted in biologic-experienced patients. Long-term extension results and post-hoc analysis data of these two trials are also available., Expert Opinion: The results provided by the trials indicate that UPA may be used to treat all of the clinical manifestations of PsA. Venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, and malignancy, the most feared adverse events associated with JaK inhibitor use, were not increased in the trial populations, yet long-term observational studies are needed to make sure that UPA is safe in this respect.

Background: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this post-approval study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UPA over 24 weeks and identify clinical predictors of response, in a multicentric cohort of patients affected by PsA., Methods: One hundred and twenty-six patients with PsA treated with UPA were enrolled in 10 Italian centres. UPA effectiveness outcomes, such as the proportion of patients with MDA status, DAPSA remission, and low disease activity, ASDAS-CRP inactive and low disease activity, and change from baseline in DAPSA and ASDAS-CRP scores, were evaluated every 12 weeks until week 24. The proportion of DAPSA minor, moderate, and major improvement, and ASDAS clinically important improvement (CII) and major improvement (MI) were considered as well. All treatment-related adverse events were collected during the observation period. Clinical predictors of MDA response at week 24 were evaluated through multivariate analysis., Results: At baseline, 124/126 (98%) and 54/126 (43%) patients showed peripheral and axial involvement, respectively; 110 (87%) patients were intolerant or resistant to biologic DMARDs.  At 24 weeks, MDA status, DAPSA remission, and ASDAS-CRP inactive disease were achieved in 47%, 23%, and 48% of patients, respectively. Minor, moderate, and major DAPSA improvement was observed in 67%, 39%, and 23%, respectively; while 65% and 35% achieved ASDAS-CRP CII and MI, respectively. The mean change from baseline was 15.9 ± 13.5 (p < 0.001) for DAPSA and 1.21 ± 0.97 (p < 0.001) for ASDAS-CRP. Thirteen patients (10%) discontinued UPA due to a lack of efficacy or non-serious adverse events. No serious adverse events were observed. Male gender (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.03-6.25 p = 0.043), being naïve to biological DMARDs (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.34-12.71, p = 0.013) and elevated baseline CRP (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.02-6.12, p = 0.046) were associated with MDA response at week 24., Conclusions: This is one of the first real-life studies supporting the effectiveness of UPA and its safety profile in PsA patients. Furthermore, the study identifies predictors of MDA response to UPA treatment at 6 months., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background : Tofacitinib (TOFA) was the first Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) to be approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on the retention rate of TOFA therapy are still far from definitive. Objective : The goal of this study is to add new real-world data on the TOFA retention rate in a cohort of RA patients followed for a long period of time. Methods : A multicenter retrospective study of RA subjects treated with TOFA as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was conducted in 23 Italian tertiary rheumatology centers. The study considered a treatment period of up to 48 months for all included patients. The TOFA retention rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) for TOFA discontinuation were obtained using Cox regression analysis. Results : We enrolled a total of 213 patients. Data analysis revealed that the TOFA retention rate was 86.5% (95% CI: 81.8-91.5%) at month 12, 78.8% (95% CI: 78.8-85.2%) at month 24, 63.8% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 36, and 59.9% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 48 after starting treatment. None of the factors analyzed, including the number of previous treatments received, disease activity or duration, presence of rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibody, and presence of comorbidities, were predictive of the TOFA retention rate. Safety data were comparable to those reported in the registration studies. Conclusions : TOFA demonstrated a long retention rate in RA in a real-world setting. This result, together with the safety data obtained, underscores that TOFA is a viable alternative for patients who have failed treatment with csDMARD and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Further large, long-term observational studies are urgently needed to confirm these results.

Introduction: Polymyalgia rheumatica is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease in subjects aged 50 years or older and classically presents with shoulder and/or pelvic girdle pain and prolonged morning stiffness. Glucocorticoids represent the standard of treatment; glucocorticoid therapy is usually required for 1-2 years and often results in significant glucocorticoid-related side effects, especially in the elderly., Areas Covered: In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the management of polymyalgia rheumatica, with a particular focus on adjunctive therapies to the standard glucocorticoid treatment., Expert Opinion: Given the high frequency of disease relapses (one-third of patients) and the adverse events related to prolonged glucocorticoid use, the need for glucocorticoid-sparing agents remains an important issue in the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. In selected patients, who are at risk for glucocorticoid-related side effects or in those with glucocorticoid-refractory disease, the addition of a glucocorticoid-sparing agent, either a synthetic or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, may represent a reasonable and effective therapeutic approach.

Objective: To evaluate tocilizumab (TCZ) efficacy in patients with refractory Behçet disease (BD)., Methods: This is a multicenter study of 30 patients fulfilling the international criteria for BD and treated with TCZ at different European referral centers. The clinical response was evaluated at 6 months from TCZ initiation., Results: Ninety percent of patients with BD were refractory or intolerant to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Overall, TCZ was effective in 25 (83%) patients with BD of whom 18 (60%) and 7 (23%) were complete and partial responders, respectively. The complete response was 67%, 60%, and 42% in patients with uveitis (18/30), neurological manifestations (5/30), and mucocutaneous and/or articular (7/30) manifestations, respectively. TCZ had a significant steroid-sparing effect allowing patients to decrease their median daily prednisone dose from 20 (IQR 10-40) mg/day to 9 (IQR 5-13) mg at 6 months ( P < 0.001). The number of patients with BD needing concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy fell from 7 (23%) to 4 (13%) at 6 months. Mild to moderate side effects were observed in 6 (20%) patients, and 3 (10%) presented with serious adverse events (pneumonia, intestinal perforation, and septicemia) requiring therapy discontinuation in 2 cases., Conclusion: TCZ seems to be an effective alternative to anti-TNF agents in treating BD-related uveitis and neurological manifestations., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: In this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel, Japan, Tunisia and Russia regarding biological-targeted therapies in TAK, since January 2017 to September 2019., Results: A total of 109 TAK patients received at least 3 months tocilizumab therapy and were included in this study. Among them, 91 and 18 patients received intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively. A complete response (NIH <2 with less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone) at 6 months was evidenced in 69% of TAK patients, of whom 57 (70%) and 11 (69%) patients were on intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively (p=0.95). The factors associated with complete response to tocilizumab at 6 months in multivariate analysis, only age <30 years (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.12; p=0.027) and time between TAK diagnosis and tocilizumab initiation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; p=0.034). During the median follow-up of 30.1 months (0.4; 105.8) and 10.8 (0.1; 46.4) (p<0.0001) in patients who received tocilizumab in intravenous and SC forms, respectively, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in TAK patients on SC tocilizumab (HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.02; p=0.033). The overall cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months in TAK patients was at 13.7% (95% CI 7.6% to 21.5%), with 10.3% (95% CI 4.8% to 18.4%) for those on intravenous tocilizumab vs 30.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 54.2%) for patients receiving SC tocilizumab. Adverse events occurred in 14 (15%) patients on intravenous route and in 2 (11%) on SC tocilizumab., Conclusion: In this study, we confirm that tocilizumab is effective in TAK, with complete remission being achieving by 70% of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-refractory TAK patients at 6 months., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 1%. Currently, RA treatment aims to achieve low disease activity or remission. Failure to achieve this goal causes disease progression with a poor prognosis. When treatment with first-line drugs fails, treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors may be prescribed to which many patients do not respond adequately, making the identification of response markers urgent. This study investigated the association of two RA-related genetic polymorphisms, c.665C>T (historically referred to as C677T) and c.1298A>C, in the MTHFR gene as response markers to an anti-TNF-α therapy. A total of 81 patients were enrolled, 60% of whom responded to the therapy. Analyses showed that both polymorphisms were associated with a response to therapy in an allele dose-dependent manner. The association for c.665C>T was significant for a rare genotype ( p = 0.01). However, the observed opposite trend of association for c.1298A>C was not significant. An analysis revealed that c.1298A>C, unlike c.665C>T, was also significantly associated with the drug type ( p = 0.032). Our preliminary results showed that the genetic polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene were associated with a response to anti-TNF-α therapy, with a potential significance for the anti-TNF-α drug type. This evidence suggests a role for one-carbon metabolism in anti-TNF-α drug efficacy and contributes to further personalized RA interventions.

Objectives: To describe the effectiveness and safety of biologics for the treatment of relapsing and/or refractory polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)., Methods: A retrospective European collaborative study was conducted in patients with PAN who received biologics for relapsing and/or refractory disease., Results: Forty-two patients with PAN received a total of 53 biologic courses, including TNF-α blockers in 15 cases, rituximab (RTX) in 18 cases, tocilizumab (TCZ) in 10 cases and other biologics in 10 cases. TNF-α blockers and TCZ were mainly used for refractory diseases whereas RTX was mainly initiated for relapsing disease. After a median follow-up of 29 (8-50) months, remission, partial response, treatment failure and treatment discontinuation due to severe adverse events occurred in, respectively, 40%, 13%, 40% and 7% of patients receiving TNF-α blockers, 50%, none, 30% and 20% of TCZ recipients, and 33%, 11%, 56% and none of the RTX recipients. No remission was noted in patients treated with other biologics. Severe adverse events were observed in 14 (28%) patients without significant differences between the three biologics, leading to early biologics discontinuation in only three cases., Conclusion: These results suggest that TCZ may be effective in relapsing and/or refractory PAN. Our data warrant further study to confirm these findings., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Methotrexate (MTX) is considered the first choice among disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. However, response to it varies as approximately 40% of the patients do not respond and would lose the most effective period of treatment time. Therefore, having a predictive biomarker before starting MTX treatment is of utmost importance. Methylation of long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) is generally considered a surrogate marker for global genomic methylation, which has been reported to associate with disease activity after MTX therapy., Methods: We performed a prospective study on 273 naïve early RA (ERA) patients who were treated with MTX, followed up to 12 months, and classified according to their therapy response. The baseline LINE-1 methylation levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of cases were assessed by bisulfite pyrosequencing., Results: Baseline LINE-1 methylation level per se turned out not to predict the response to the therapy, nor did age, sex, body mass index, or smoking status. However, if cases were stratified according to positivity to rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) or seronegativity, we observed an opposite association between baseline LINE-1 methylation levels and optimal response to MTX therapy among responders. The best response to MTX therapy was associated with hypermethylated LINE-1 among double-positive ERA cases ( p -value: 0.002) and with hypomethylated LINE-1 in seronegative ERA patients ( p -value: 0.01)., Conclusion: The LINE-1 methylation level in PBMCs of naïve ERA cases associates with the degree of response to MTX therapy in an opposite way depending on the presence of RF and ACPA antibodies. Our results suggest LINE-1 methylation level as a new epigenetic biomarker for predicting the degree of response to MTX in both double-positive and seronegative ERA patients.

Objective: There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence., Methods: In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03)., Conclusion: Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

The concern about the offspring's health is one of the reasons for a reduced family size of women with rheumatic diseases (RD). Increased risk of autoimmune diseases (AD) and neurodevelopmental disorders (ND) has been reported in children born to patients with RD. Within a nationwide survey about reproductive issues of women with RD, we aimed at exploring the long-term outcome of their children. By surveying 398 patients who received their diagnosis of RD during childbearing age (before the age of 45), information about the offspring were obtained from 230 women who declared to have had children. A total of 148 (64.3%) patients were affected by connective tissue diseases (CTD) and 82 (35.7%) by chronic arthritis. Data on 299 children (156 males, 52.1%; mean age at the time of interview 17.1 ± 9.7 years) were collected. Twelve children (4.0%), who were born to patients with CTD in 75% of the cases, were affected by AD (8 cases of celiac disease). Eleven children had a certified diagnosis of ND (3.6%; 6 cases of learning disabilities); 9 of them were born to mothers with CTD (5 after maternal diagnosis). No association was found between ND and prenatal exposure to either maternal autoantibodies or anti-rheumatic drugs. Absolute numbers of offspring affected by AD and ND were low in a multicentre cohort of Italian women with RD. This information can be helpful for the counselling about reproductive issues, as the health outcomes of the offspring might not be an issue which discourage women with RD from having children., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: Autoimmune systemic diseases (ASD) represent a predisposing condition to COVID-19. Our prospective, observational multicenter telephone survey study aimed to investigate the prevalence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 in Italian ASD patients., Methods: The study included 3,918 ASD pts (815 M, 3103 F; mean age 59±12SD years) consecutively recruited between March 2020 and May 2021 at the 36 referral centers of COVID-19 and ASD Italian Study Group. The possible development of COVID-19 was recorded by means of a telephone survey using a standardized symptom assessment questionnaire., Results: ASD patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19 (8.37% vs. 6.49%; p<0.0001) but a death rate statistically comparable to the Italian general population (3.65% vs. 2.95%). Among the 328 ASD patients developing COVID-19, 17% needed hospitalization, while mild-moderate manifestations were observed in 83% of cases. Moreover, 12/57 hospitalized patients died due to severe interstitial pneumonia and/or cardiovascular events; systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients showed a significantly higher COVID-19-related death rate compared to the general population (6.29% vs. 2.95%; p=0.018). Major adverse prognostic factors to develop COVID-19 were: older age, male gender, SSc, pre-existing ASD-related interstitial lung involvement, and long-term steroid treatment. Of note, patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) showed a significantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 compared to those without (3.58% vs. 46.99%; p=0.000), as well as the SSc patients treated with low dose aspirin (with 5.57% vs. without 27.84%; p=0.000)., Conclusion: During the first three pandemic waves, ASD patients showed a death rate comparable to the general population despite the significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19. A significantly increased COVID-19- related mortality was recorded in only SSc patients' subgroup, possibly favored by preexisting lung fibrosis. Moreover, ongoing long-term treatment with csDMARDs in ASD might usefully contribute to the generally positive outcomes of this frail patients' population., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Objectives: To ascertain if the use of hydroxychloroquine(HCQ)/cloroquine(CLQ) and other conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and rheumatic diseases per se may be associated with COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization and mortality., Methods: This case-control study nested within a cohort of cDMARD users was conducted in the Lombardy, Veneto, Tuscany and Lazio regions and Reggio Emilia province. Claims databases were linked to COVID-19 surveillance registries. The risk of COVID-19-related outcomes was estimated using a multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis comparing HCQ/CLQ vs MTX, vs other cDMARDs and vs non-use of these drugs. The presence of rheumatic diseases vs their absence in a non-nested population was investigated., Results: A total of 1275 patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 were matched to 12 734 controls. Compared with recent use of MTX, no association between HCQ/CLQ monotherapy and COVID-19 hospitalization [odds ratio (OR) 0.83 (95% CI 0.69, 1.00)] or mortality [OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.85, 1.67)] was observed. A lower risk was found when comparing HCQ/CLQ use with the concomitant use of other cDMARDs and glucocorticoids. HCQ/CLQ was not associated with COVID-19 hospitalization as compared with non-use. An increased risk for recent use of either MTX monotherapy [OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.05, 1.34)] or other cDMARDs [OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.08, 1.36)] vs non-use was found. Rheumatic diseases were not associated with COVID-19-related outcomes., Conclusion: HCQ/CLQ use in rheumatic patients was not associated with a protective effect against COVID-19-related outcomes. The use of other cDMARDs was associated with an increased risk when compared with non-use and, if concomitantly used with glucocorticoids, also vs HCQ/CLQ, probably due to immunosuppressive action., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disease activity, treatment adherence, and work ability in the real-world setting in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: QUASAR was a prospective 12-month, observational study involving 23 rheumatology centres across Italy, including adult patients with axSpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. Patients were followed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months for disease activity and health-related QoL (HRQoL), treatment adherence and work ability. Regression analysis was used to assess the association between treatment and outcome variables., Results: 413 (80.7%) out of axSpA 512 patients were diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 99 (19.3%) with non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). Nr-axSpA and AS patients had similar baseline disease activity and HRQoL. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were the most frequent medication (n=426, 83.2%). Over the 1-year follow-up, disease activity measures (joint pain and swelling, CRP, global assessment, BASDAI, ASDAS), HRQoL and work ability significantly improved, while few differences emerged between nr-axSpA and AS patients. Treatment satisfaction and adherence questionnaires improved over the 12 months. Patients treated with bDMARDs showed improved outcomes for disease activity measures and HRQoL variables, greater benefit observed in patients with AS., Conclusions: We found clinical and HRQoL improvement over 1 year in a large, real-world population of nr-axSpA and AS patients treated with bDMARDs or conventional synthetic DMARDs.

Objectives: Efficacy evaluation of GCA treatment is primarily based on non-specific symptoms and laboratory markers. We aimed to assess the change in vascular inflammation in patients with large vessel (LV)-GCA under different treatments using [18F]FDG PET/CT., Methods: Observational study on patients with new-onset, active LV-GCA starting treatment with either prednisolone monotherapy (PRED) or combination with MTX or tocilizumab (TOC). All patients underwent baseline and follow-up PET/CT. The aorta and its major branches were assessed using PET vascular activity score (PETVAS) by independent readers. Cumulative glucocorticoid doses and cessation of glucocorticoid treatment were documented in all patients., Results: We included 88 LV-GCA patients, 27 were treated with PRED, 42 with MTX and 19 with TOC. PETVAS decreased from 18.9-8.0 units at follow-up in the overall population (P <0.001). PETVAS changes were numerically higher in patients receiving MTX (-12.3 units) or TOC (-11.7 units) compared with PRED (-8.7). Mean cumulative prednisolone dosages were 5637, 4418 and 2984 mg in patients treated with PRED, MTX and TOC (P =0.002). Risk ratios for glucocorticoid discontinuation at the time of follow-up PET/CT were 6.77 (95% CI: 1.01, 45.29; P =0.049) and 16.25 (95% CI: 2.60, 101.73; P =0.003) for MTX and TOC users compared with PRED users., Conclusion: Treatment of LV-GCA inhibits vascular inflammation in the aorta and its major branches. While similar control of vascular inflammation was achieved with PRED, MTX and TOC treatments, TOC showed a strong glucocorticoid sparing effect, supporting the concept of initial combination therapy., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Biologic drugs (bDMARD), especially TNF-α-inhibitors (TNFi), are used in refractory Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) patients. Up to 23% of patients are switched to a different bDMARD because of inefficacy. No data are available on which strategy is more efficient after TNFi failure. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether a switch or swap strategy should be preferred in TAK patients failing TNFis., Methods: TAK patients treated with a second bDMARD after the failure of the first TNFi were identified from 3 referral centres. Patients were classified as switch if treated with a different TNFi, and swap if treated with a non-TNFi bDMARD. Baseline features were evaluated. Efficacy and safety of the second bDMARD at 6 and 12 months were assessed and a comparison between switch and swap patients was made., Results: Twenty-four TAK patients were identified. Eleven patients (46%) were switched and 13 patients (54%) were swapped (12 to tocilizumab, 1 to ustekinumab). Baseline features of patients in the 2 groups were comparable. At 12 months, the second bDMARD was suspended in 4 switch (36%) and in 5 swap (42%) patients. Second biologic drug survival and relapse-free survival were equivalent between the two groups at 6 and 12 months. A vascular worsening was observed in 4 switch (40%) and 2 swap (25%) patients. Severe infections, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or cancer were recorded in no patient., Conclusions: Our retrospective study suggests that in first-line TNFi failure TAK patients both switch and swap strategies can be considered suitable approaches.

Objective: To evaluate the susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with autoimmune conditions treated with antimalarials in a population-based study., Methods: All residents treated with chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) from July through December 2019 and living in 3 provinces of Regione Emilia-Romagna were identified by drug prescription registries and matched with the registry containing all residents living in the same areas who have had swabs and tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated., Results: A total of 4,408 patients were identified. The prevalence of patients receiving antimalarials was 0.85 per 1,000 men and 3.3 per 1,000 women. The cumulative incidence of testing during the study period was 2.7% in the general population and 3.8% among those receiving CQ or HCQ, while the cumulative incidence of testing positive was 0.55% in the general population and 0.70% among those receiving CQ/HCQ. Multivariate models showed that those receiving CQ/HCQ had a slightly higher probability of being tested compared to the general population (OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.94-1.28]), the same probability of being diagnosed as having COVID-19 (OR 0.94 [95% CI 0.66-1.34]), and a slightly lower probability of being positive once tested (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.56-1.23]). None of the differences were significant., Conclusion: Our findings do not support the use of antimalarials as a prophylactic treatment of COVID-19., (© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Recently, research has been focused on the identification of predictors of response to treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict the clinical response at 6 months in patients with PsA starting the anti-tumour necrosis factor-α golimumab., Methods: This prospective observational study explored a range of factors, including demographic data and baseline characteristics of the disease, measures of disease activity and functional disability, and potential laboratory biomarkers in the prediction of response, defined as the achievement of modified-minimal disease activity (mMDA), to golimumab in PsA patients., Results: We studied 151 PsA patients starting golimumab because of their active disease. After 6 months, the rate of drug persistence on golimumab was 80%, and mMDA was achieved in 44.3% of patients. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, lower disease activity in PsA score (DAPSA) at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96, p<0.001) was independent predictor of mMDA at 6 months. High sensitivity C-reactive protein value (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.13, p=0.026) at baseline also was a predictive factor of mMDA achievement at 6 months in the laboratory-enhanced prediction model. Golimumab was safe and well tolerated., Conclusions: The identification of factors predictive of response to treatment may help in better understanding the response to golimumab and in identifying PsA patients that are most likely to achieve mMDA following therapy with golimumab.

Background: Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) in 2009, several relevant randomised clinical trials and cohort analyses have been published, which have the potential to change clinical care and therefore supporting the need to update the original recommendations., Methods: Using EULAR standardised operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations, the EULAR task force undertook a systematic literature review and sought opinion from 20 experts from 13 countries. We modified existing recommendations and created new recommendations., Results: Three overarching principles and 10 recommendations were formulated. We recommend that a suspected diagnosis of LVV should be confirmed by imaging or histology. High dose glucocorticoid therapy (40-60 mg/day prednisone-equivalent) should be initiated immediately for induction of remission in active giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK). We recommend adjunctive therapy in selected patients with GCA (refractory or relapsing disease, presence of an increased risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events or complications) using tocilizumab. Methotrexate may be used as an alternative. Non-biological glucocorticoid-sparing agents should be given in combination with glucocorticoids in all patients with TAK and biological agents may be used in refractory or relapsing patients. We no longer recommend the routine use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for treatment of LVV unless it is indicated for other reasons., Conclusions: We have updated the recommendations for the management of LVV to facilitate the translation of current scientific evidence and expert opinion into better management and improved outcome of patients in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EB received consultancies from Roche (payed to the University Medical Center Groningen). FB received grants from Horizon and Mundipharma and speaker fees and/or consultancies from Horizon, Mundipharma, Roche and Sanofi. HB received a grant and speaker fees from Roche. BD received consultancies and/or speaker fees from BMS, Chugai, GSK and Roche. CD received and grant from Celgene and speaker fees and/or consultancies from Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Roche and Sanofi. BH received speaker fees and/or consultancies from Abbvie, Boehringer, Chugai, Celgene, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. SM received speaker fees and consultancies from Roche and Chugai. WS received a grant from Roche and speaker fees and consultancies from Chugai, GSG, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi. CT received a grant from BMS and speaker fees and/or consultancies from Abbvie, BMS, Pfizer and Roche. PV received a grant for conducting an RCT in GCA from Roche. All other authors have no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To describe the baseline characteristics of the patients enrolled in the QUality of life in patients with Axial SpondyloARthritis (QUASAR) study in terms of quality of life (QoL), disease activity, therapy adherence, and work ability in a real-world setting., Methods: QUASAR is an Italian multicentre, prospective 12-month observational study, including consecutive adult patients classified as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for axSpA., Results: Of 512 patients enrolled in 23 rheumatology centres, 80.7% had ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 19.3% had non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). Mean ages were 34.1±13.3 years at axSpA symptoms onset and 39.5±13.0 years at diagnosis. Of the patients, 51.4% presented with ≥1 extra articular manifestation (EAM); the most common were psoriasis (17.8%) and uveitis (16.4%). Patients with nr-axSpA and AS had similar EAM rates, disease activity, and QoL. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; 83.2%) were the most commonly received medication, followed by conventional synthetic DMARDs (22.9%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 16.6%). At baseline, higher treatment satisfaction was reported with bDMARDs which, together with NSAIDs, were associated with the best overall scores for disease activity, function, and QoL in the overall population and AS subgroup., Conclusions: QUASAR is the first Italian prospective study that comprehensively evaluated a large axSpA patient sample in a real-world setting. This interim analysis at baseline confirmed that i) patients with AS and nr-axSpA have similar QoL and disease burden, ii) nearly all axSpA patients receive treatment, and iii) bDMARDs and NSAIDs, overall, yield better disease activity and QoL.

Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a chronic (auto)-inflammatory disorder characterized by different clusters of symptoms, including mucocutaneous and ocular involvements. Interleukin-1 inhibitors anakinra (ANA), canakinumab (CAN), and gevokizumab (GEV) represent a promising therapeutic alternative in BS. To date, evidence on the use of ANA, CAN, and GEV is mainly based on small isolated studies or case series, and the real place of anti-IL1 agents in the treatment of BS is still unclear. We performed a systematic review of current evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-IL1 agents in BS. The PubMed search yielded a total of 398 references, from which we retrieved 24 studies for inclusion (4 clinical trials, 6 observational studies, 14 case reports, case series or letters to the editor). Four studies evaluated the overall efficacy of IL-1 inhibitors, 15 studies focused on the specific efficacy of ANA, whereas efficacy of CAN and GEV was evaluated in 8 and 3 studies, respectively. Both ANA and CAN were associated with good control of mucocutaneous and ocular manifestations. ANA resulted effective also for osteoarticular manifestations. GEV was studied only for ocular manifestations, but gave contrasting results. Discordant evidence supports the use of ANA and CAN in pediatric setting and for first-line treatment of general BS manifestations. Most frequent side effects were local or diffuse cutaneous reactions and injection site reactions, particularly for ANA treatment. Blocking the IL-1 pathway could be an effective therapeutic strategy in particular BS involvements.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and prior inadequate response to or intolerance of 1 or 2 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi)., Methods: In this phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients with an inadequate response to or intolerance of 1 or 2 TNFi and an established diagnosis of axial SpA (according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society [ASAS] criteria for radiographic axial SpA, with radiographic sacroiliitis defined according to the modified New York criteria and ≥1 feature of SpA) were recruited and randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo or 80-mg subcutaneous ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or 4 weeks (IXEQ4W), with an 80-mg or 160-mg starting dose. The primary end point was 40% improvement in disease activity according to the ASAS criteria (ASAS40) at week 16. Secondary outcomes and safety were also assessed., Results: A total of 316 patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 104), IXEQ2W (n = 98), or IXEQ4W (n = 114). At week 16, significantly higher proportions of IXEQ2W patients (n = 30 [30.6%]; P = 0.003) or IXEQ4W patients (n = 29 [25.4%]; P = 0.017) had achieved an ASAS40 response versus the placebo group (n = 13 [12.5%]), with statistically significant differences reported as early as week 1 with ixekizumab treatment. Statistically significant improvements in disease activity, function, quality of life, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging-evident inflammation were observed after 16 weeks of ixekizumab treatment versus placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) with ixekizumab treatment were more frequent than with placebo. Serious AEs were similar across treatment arms. One death was reported (IXEQ2W group)., Conclusion: Ixekizumab treatment for 16 weeks in patients with active radiographic axial SpA and previous inadequate response to or intolerance of 1 or 2 TNFi yields rapid and significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of radiographic axial SpA versus placebo., (© 2018 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS)., Methods: A total of 159 patients with biological-naïve AS, with active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score of ≥4), were randomised (1:1:1:1) to risankizumab (18 mg single dose, 90 mg or 180 mg at day 1 and weeks 8, 16 and 24) or placebo over a 24-week blinded period. The primary outcome was a 40% improvement in Assessment in Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS40) at week 12. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug., Results: At week 12, ASAS40 response rates were 25.5%, 20.5% and 15.0% in the 18 mg, 90 mg and 180 mg risankizumab groups, respectively, compared with 17.5% in the placebo group. The estimated difference in proportion between the 180 mg risankizumab and placebo groups (primary endpoint) was -2.5% (95% CI -21.8 to 17.0; p=0.42). Rates of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups., Conclusions: Treatment with risankizumab did not meet the study primary endpoint and showed no evidence of clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in patients with active AS, suggesting that IL-23 may not be a relevant driver of disease pathogenesis and symptoms in AS., Trial Registration Number: NCT02047110; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DB reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, Novartis and Eli Lilly and part-time employment at UCB. MØ reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AbbVie, BMS, Merck, UCB and Novartis; grants and personal fees from Celgene; personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, Pfizer and Roche; and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Regeneron, Orion and Hospira. JS reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. PJ reports grants from AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB and grants and personal fees from BMS and Pfizer. YD, CP, SV, DBH, SA, PS and SJP report being employees of Boehringer Ingelheim., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 46 TA patients treated with tocilizumab. We analyzed factors associated with response to tocilizumab (assessed using NIH score)., Results: Forty-six patients with TA were included, with a median age of 43 years [29-54], and 35 (76%) females. We observed a decrease in the median NIH scale (from 3 [2-3] at baseline to 0 [0-1] and 0 at 3 and 6 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). The daily prednisone dose also decreased from 15 mg [8-19] at baseline to 4 mg [5-21] and 5 mg [4.5-9] at 3 and 6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001) under tocilizumab. The overall tocilizumab failure free survival was 81% [CI 95%; 0.7-0.95], 72% [CI 95%; 0.55-0.95] and 48% [CI 95%; 0.2-0.1] at 12, 24 and 48 months, respectively. The presence of constitutional symptoms (HR 5.6 [CI 95%; 1.08-29], p = 0.041), and C-reactive protein level (HR 1.16 [CI 95%; 1.01-1.31], P = 0.003) at the time of tocilizumab initiation were significantly associated with tocilizumab event-free survival. The event-free survival was significantly better under tocilizumab therapy in comparison to DMARDs (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: This large multicenter study shows that tocilizumab is efficient and may reduce the incidence of relapses in TA., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are chronic diseases affecting the striated muscles with variable involvement of other organs. Glucocorticoids are considered the cornerstone of treatment, but some patients require adjunctive immunosuppressive agents because of insufficient response to glucocorticoids, flares upon glucocorticoid tapering, or glucocorticoid-related adverse events. Areas covered: The aim of this article was to review (PubMed search until February 2018) the evidence on established and new therapies derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on adult DM and PM. In addition, key data from open-label trials, case reports, and abstracts were included where data from RCT were lacking. Expert commentary: Numerous synthetic and biological immunosuppressive agents are currently available to treat the IIM, sometimes in combination. The choice of the specific medication in the individual patient depends upon the disease phenotype and patient's characteristics. Exercise improves muscle performance without causing disease flares and should be an integral part of the treatment of the IIM. Prompt diagnosis and treatment can lead to better outcome.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex on response to treatment and disease remission in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with axSpA, according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA, and treated with adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab, were studied. We compared clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, disease activity, function, and response to treatment in male and female patients with this disease., Results: Three hundred forty patients with axSpA (270 with ankylosing spondylitis, 19 with psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement, and 51 with nonradiographic axSpA) were studied. Male subjects had a significantly higher prevalence of grade IV sacroiliitis, higher levels of serum C-reactive protein, lower Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, and fatigue when compared with females. Further, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of partial remission, ASAS40 response, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) major improvement, but not ASDAS inactive disease, were significantly lower in female patients., Conclusion: Our data suggest that female sex was associated with a lower rate of response to treatment and of disease remission in patients with axSpA treated with antitumor necrosis factor-α drugs.

Objectives: To update the 2011 Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) recommendations for the use of biologics and other novel agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: To create this new set of recommendations, the SIR "Spondyloartritis and Psoriatic Arthritis study group - A. Spadaro" went through the following steps: literature search, identification of the items of interests for each of the four previously identified clinical domains of PsA and the different treatment phases, achievement of the consensus on all topics, and generation of the recommendations., Results: An update on the available evidence on all of the biologics and new small molecules tested in PsA is reported, comprising the data for each of the individual articular manifestation. Indications for therapy inclusion criteria, choice of the drug, disease assessment, response definition, therapy failure management, and disease remission management for PsA peripheral joint arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and spondylitis are provided. Suggestions for the treatment of patients with PsA and concomitant extra-articular manifestations are also given., Conclusions: These evidence-based recommendations may be used for guidance in the complex and fast-evolving field of the treatment of PsA.

Objectives: To perform a population-based study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic treatments., Methods: 1087 patients with RA were enrolled; inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed RA, already diagnosed RA with high disease activity (HDA) (DAS28≥4.2) starting biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), already diagnosed RA with HDA continuing with conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). The following data were collected: demographics, clinical and laboratory features, imaging and prescribed drugs. All parameters except immunology and imaging (performed yearly) were repeated at each follow-up evaluations (after 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter every 12 months). In order to evaluate clinical response, the EULAR response criteria were used as the gold standard., Results: 414 (38.1%) newly diagnosed patients with RA, 477 (43.9%) RA patients who started bDMARDs and 196 (18.0%) RA patients who continued with cDMARDs were enrolled from April 2012 to March 2015 at 12 Rheumatology Centres in the Emilia Romagna Region. Statistical analyses showed a relative risk ratio (RRR) for moderate response of 1.65 in RA patients who started bDMARDs (p=0.16) and 2.49 for newly diagnosed RA (p=0.01). Sex, age and Health Assessment Questionnaire were not statistically significant. A RRR of 2.00 has been confirmed for RA patients who started bDMARDs (p<0.0005) for a good response as well as 2.20 for newly diagnosed RA (p<0.0005). An increase in adverse events among bDMARDs was found, but when looking at infections or neoplasia, no differences were highlighted between RA which started bDMARDs and RA who continued with cDMARDs., Conclusions: Our results are in line with already published papers from British and Swedish Registries: a greater likelihood to have a good response is demonstrated for not longstanding RA starting cDMARDs or RA with HDA when a bDMARD is started. Also a good safety profile is demonstrated.

The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) in a large series of Behçet's disease (BD)-related uveitis. We performed a multicenter retrospective observational study including 40 selected patients (66 eyes) receiving ADA. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed at baseline, at 3 and 12 months of treatment. Primary end point was reduction of ocular inflammatory flares. Secondary end points were improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reduction of macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), reduction in the occurrence of vasculitis assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA), and evaluation of statistically significant differences between patients treated with ADA monotherapy and those undergoing ADA plus DMARDs and in patients firstly treated with ADA compared to patients previously administered with other biologics; ADA steroid sparing effect was also evaluated. During the first 12 months of ADA therapy, the number of flares significantly decreased from 200 flares/100 patients/year to 8.5 flares/100 patients/year (p < 0.0001). Similarly, BCVA improved if compared to baseline (7.4 ± 2.9 versus 8.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.03). OCT findings significantly improved showing a mean reduction of central macular thickness (CMT) of 27.27 ± 42.8 μm at the end of follow-up (p < 0.006). FA identified retinal vasculitis in 22 cases at baseline (55%), 8 (20%) cases after 3 months, and in only one (2.5%) case at 12-month follow-up. FA improvement was highly significant at 3- and 12-month follow-up if compared to baseline (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006, respectively). ADA is highly effective and safe for the treatment of BD-related uveitis, providing a long-term control of ocular inflammation.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to have an overview of the current approach to psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by a group of Italian rheumatologists., Methods: Rheumatologists from all around Italy were asked to participate in a survey to give their opinion on a number of statements made by a panel of rheumatologists who are experts in PsA. The survey was conducted through two rounds using a Delphi-like method. The two rounds yielded a consensus on the management of PsA., Results: Fifty rheumatologist from 50 rheumatology centres participated in the survey. Of the 117 proposed statements, only 10 did not reach the 66% concordance threshold. The main results of the survey were that diagnosis of PsA should be made using both the CASPAR criteria and clinical judgment, that all of the features of the psoriatic disease are relevant in the assessment and therapy of PsA, that treatment recommendations are taken into account, that all of the available biological agents may be used in bio-naïve patients, that anti-drug antibody testing is still not used in daily practice, that both switching or swapping are useful options in the case of bio-failure because of lack or loss of efficacy, and that swapping is considered the best choice in the case of bio-failure due to adverse events., Conclusions: The results of this survey showed that a comprehensive evaluation of the patient and a therapy choice based on both patient clinical features and evidence of drug efficacy and safety are considered the current best of care for PsA patients.

Aims: Primary: to investigate Italian rheumatology practice regarding latent tubercular infection (LTBI) detection and tuberculosis (TB) prevention in patients requiring anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Secondary: to assess the overall number of TB cases over 10 years and their distribution by drug., Methods: An anonymous, 24 multiple-response questionnaire was completed by 393/449 (87.5%) rheumatologists prescribing anti-TNF therapy. Six questions provided setting information, and 18 the compliance with recommendations and the recorded TB cases., Results: The Italian recommendations were used by 323 (82%) and other sets by 60 (15%). TB specialists were always consulted by 81 (21%) and occasionally by 73 (19%). LTBI screening was made using chest radiograph (CR) by 5%, tuburculin skin test (TST) by 5.3%, CR + TST by 35.6%, interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) by 7.4%, CR + IGRAs by 26% and CR + TST + IGRA by 20.6%. Isoniazid was initiated in the presence of positivity of TST by 97 (24.7%), TST + IGRA by 101 (25.7%) and IGRA by 195 (49.6%). Anti-TNF starting delay was 1 month in 63.1% of the cases, 3 months in 27.7%, concomitantly in 5.6%. Overall, 317 TB reactivation cases occurred in 39 353 patients, with an incidence rate of 80.5 cases/100 000/year (10 times higher than in the Italian general population). TB occurred during TB prophylaxis in 192 (60.6%). TB cases incidence rate divided by drug was: etanercept (ETN) 51 (16%), 28/100 000/year, adalimumab (ADA) 98 (31%), 89/100 000/year, infliximab (IFX) 137 (43.2%), 211/100 000/year, with a significantly lower frequency in the ETN group compared to ADA and IFX groups (χ(2)  = P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Italian rheumatologists are highly aware of anti-TNF-related TB risk with variable LTBI screening and TB prevention strategies. TB outcome was significantly lower in the ETN group., (© 2015 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate rate and predictive factors of loss of remission and disease flare in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment., Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with axSpA, according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria, treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab with a minimum followup of 12 months and satisfying the ASAS partial remission criteria and/or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease were studied. Disease flare was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score > 4.5 or ASDAS score > 2.5 on at least 1 occasion., Results: One hundred seventy-four patients with axSpA were studied. After a median [interquartile range (IQR)] followup of 4 years (2-6), 37 patients (21.2%) experienced a loss of remission and 28 (16.1% of the whole study group) a disease flare. Median (IQR) duration of remission in patients who lost this status was 1 year (0.625-2). Higher median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values, continuous nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and an ASDAS-CRP ≥ 0.8 during the remission period were significantly associated with both loss of remission and disease flare. At the multivariate analysis, continuous NSAID intake (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.4-11.74, p = 0.010) and ESR > 15 (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.23-6.82, p = 0.015) were the only factors predictive of disease reactivation., Conclusion: In this study, loss of remission and disease flares occurred, respectively, in about 21% and 16% of the patients with axSpA who achieved a state of remission while receiving anti-TNF therapy. Residual disease activity was associated with disease reactivation.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting peripheral and axial joints, usually associated with psoriasis (PsO) and involving various systems and organs (eye inflammation, such as uveitis; and involvement of nail and enthesis), and it usually requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is overexpressed in psoriatic synovium and skin plaques and its selective inhibition by anti-TNF-α agents has been demonstrated to reduce TNF-α levels in the articular environment, reversing the synovial hyperproliferative phenotype. Studies performed on anti-TNF-α agents in PsA demonstrated that they are able to reduce neutrophil and macrophage infiltration as well as vascular cell adhesion protein 1 expression with ensuing synovial thickness normalization. The efficacy of anti-TNF-α agents for all PsA manifestations (peripheral arthritis, axial involvement, enthesopathy, and skin disease) suggests that anti-TNF-α efficacy might be related to the ability to influence angiogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, reduce synovial inflammation, and slow radiological disease progression. This review describes the role of anti-TNF-α in each manifestation of PsA.

Introduction: Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in association with methotrexate (MTX)., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX-MTX combination therapy compared with RTX alone in the treatment of RA., Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study, the Italian biologic register GISEA, to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab. Moreover, the adverse events (AE) and the causes of discontinuation therapy were analyzed., Results: We identified 338 RA patients, 162 treated with RTX and 176 with RTX-MTX. After 52 and 104 weeks of therapy the disease activity score in 28 joints and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Score were available in 168 patients (78 with RTX-MTX and 60 with RTX alone), showing significant reduction without differences among the two groups. AE were reported in 142 patients (42%), for a total of 368 recorded side effects. The majority (90.5%) of AE were mild to moderate in severity. Comparable percentages of severe AE were reported in the 2 groups (9.9% for RTX alone and 9.3% for RTX+MTX). A poor disease control was observed in 14.2% and 13.5% of patients treated with RTX+MTX and RTX, respectively; while 12 patients (4.5% in RTX+MTX, and 2.5% in RTX group) suspended therapy for AE., Conclusions: RTX showed a good efficacy and safety profile in the real-life management of RA patients regardless of the association with MTX., (Copyright © 2014 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors for achieving partial remission (PR) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with anti-TNFα. We longitudinally enrolled in a multi-center study 214 AS patients, classified according to New York criteria, treated with anti-TNFα drugs adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (INF) with at least 12 months of follow up. PR was reached when the score was &lt;20 mm (on a visual analogue scale of 0-100 mm) in each of the following 4 domains: 1) patient global assessment (in the last week); 2) pain (spinal pain); 3) function [measured by the bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI)]; 4) inflammation [mean of intensity and duration of morning stiffness, from the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI)]. Two hundred fourteen AS patients (M/F=160/54; median age/range=43.2/19-78 years; median disease duration/ range=96/36-189 months) were treated with ADA (15.8%), ETA (28.9%) and INF (55.1%). At 12 and 24 months, high serum level of C reactive protein (CRP) (≥2 vs ≤0.8 mg/dL) were associated with higher rate of PR in AS patients treated with anti-TNFα drugs. At 24 months, PR was associated with shorter disease duration (≤36 vs ≥189 months) and higher erythrosedimentation rate (ESR) values (≥45 vs ≤17 mm/h). In male patients lower bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI) (≤2 vs ≥6) and absence of psoriasis were associated with higher PR rate only at 12 months. Other parameters assessed before treatment, such as BASDAI, BASFI, peripheral arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and uveitis were not associated with PR. Our long-term longitudinal study in a setting of clinical practice showed that inflammatory parameters (i.e. CRP, ESR) and disease duration represent the most important predictive variables to achieve PR with an anti-TNFα treatment.

The prognosis for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritides has improved dramatically due to earlier diagnosis, recognition of the need to treat early with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), alone or in combinations, the establishment of treatment targets, and the development of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). Many patients are now able to achieve clinical remission or low disease activity with therapy, and reduce or eliminate systemic corticosteroid use. Guidelines recommend methotrexate as a first-line agent for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; however, a majority of patients will require a change of csDMARD or step up to combination therapy with the addition of another csDMARD or a bDMARD. However, treatment failure is common and switching to a different therapy may be required. The large number of available treatment options, combined with a lack of comparative data, makes the choice of a new therapy complex and often not evidence based. We summarize and discuss evidence to inform treatment decisions in patients who require a change in therapy, including baseline factors that may predict response to therapy.

Objectives: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an effective treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. However, only few studies in real life have evaluated the efficacy of TCZ in long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (LSRA). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in refractory LSRA., Methods: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with refractory LSRA treated with at least one biologic agent were enrolled in a 19-month study in a single centre. Demographic [age, gender, disease duration, body mass index (BMI), previous therapies], clinical [total swollen and tender joints count (SJC-TJC) on 28, 44 and 68 joints, DAS28, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), infections, cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary and metabolic comorbidities], and serological [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies] data were collected. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and after three and six months., Results: Mean disease duration was 16.75±9.94 years. Seventeen out of 27 (62.9%) were RF positive and 13/27 (48.1%) were CCP positive. All of them experienced at least one previous biological agent (mean value 1.9±1.15; range 1-6). We observed a progressive reduction in all clinical and clinimetric features evaluated as well as a progressive reduction in steroids use. The EULAR response also improved. By analysing the RF positive subgroup we found that there is a better clinical response both at the 3rd and 6th month., Conclusions: TCZ is an effective and safe treatment in refractory LSRA.

Objective: The primary objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the possibility of achieving partial remission (PR) in AS patients treated with anti-TNF-α antagonists, such as adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (INF), in a real clinical practice setting. Predictors of PR were also evaluated., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with AS treated with ADA, ETA and INF from 2000 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to determine the rates of PR during the treatment with anti-TNF-α drugs., Results: A total of 283 patients with AS were treated with ADA (18.7%), ETA (26.8%) and INF (54.4%) as first anti-TNF-α drugs, with a PR rate of 57.6%. The probability of obtaining PR with ADA, ETA or INF was not significantly different among all anti-TNF-α patients. AS patients treated with a second anti-TNF-α drug had a PR rate of 40.5%, but after switching for lack of response, the probability of obtaining PR with a second anti-TNF-α drug was significantly lower from that of the first anti-TNF-α drug (P = 0.0039). The probability of obtaining PR in patients with enthesitis (P = 0.04) or psoriasis (P = 0.0016) or low levels of CRP (P = 0.0225) was significantly lower compared with that of patients without these manifestations at baseline., Conclusion: Our real-life study on PR confirmed the effectiveness of ADA, ETA or INF as first or second anti-TNF-α drugs. The presence at baseline of enthesitis or psoriasis or low CRP values yielded a lower probability of obtaining PR.

Polymyalgia rheumatica is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology affecting individuals aged fifty years and older, mainly of Caucasian ethnicity. Polymyalgia rheumatica is associated with giant cell arteritis more frequently than expected by chance alone. In both conditions, females are affected two to three times more often than males. The clinical hallmark manifestations of polymyalgia rheumatica are aching and morning stiffness in the shoulder girdle and often in the pelvic girdle and neck. Serum inflammatory markers are typically elevated, while the most consistent abnormal finding on imaging studies is bursitis in the symptomatic areas. A dramatic response to glucocorticoids is characteristic of polymyalgia rheumatica. Many patients are able to discontinue glucocorticoids six months to two years after the onset of clinical symptoms, but some patients may require longstanding glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid-sparing agents may be helpful in patients with chronic relapsing courses and those at high risk of glucocorticoid-related adverse events., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Obesity is a mild, long-lasting inflammatory disease and, as such, could increase the inflammatory burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study aim was to determine whether obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in RA patients requiring anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy for progressive and active disease despite treatment with methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs., Methods: Patients were identified from 15 outpatient clinics of university hospitals and hospitals in Italy taking part in the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Early Arthritis network. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), body mass index (BMI; categorized as <25, 25-30, and >30 kg/m(2) ), acute-phase reactants, IgM rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody values were collected. DAS28 remission was defined as a score of <2.6 lasting for at least 3 months., Results: Six hundred forty-one outpatients with longstanding RA receiving anti-TNFα blockers (adalimumab, n = 260; etanercept, n = 227; infliximab, n = 154), recruited from 2006-2009 and monitored for at least 12 months, were analyzed. The mean ± SD DAS28 at baseline was 5.6 ± 1.4. A BMI of >30 kg/m(2) was recorded in 66 (10.3%) of 641 RA patients. After 12 months of anti-TNFα treatment, a DAS28 of <2.6 was noted in 15.2% of the obese subjects, in 30.4% of the patients with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m(2) , and in 32.9% of the patients with a BMI of <25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.01). The lowest percentage of remission, which was statistically significant versus adalimumab and etanercept (P = 0.003), was observed with infliximab., Conclusion: Obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in patients with longstanding RA treated with anti-TNFα agents. A personalized treatment plan might be a possible solution., (Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Etanercept is a recombinant soluble tumour necrosis factor alpha receptor administered subcutaneously at the dose of 50 mg weekly (or 25 mg/twice weekly) for the treatment of the main chronic arthritides: rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. It shows high qualities in terms of efficacy and manageability. Favourable results were reported in all localisations of spondyloarthropathies: axial disease, peripheral arthritis, and enthesitis. In particular, several studies demonstrated its efficacy on the clinical and functional indicators of ankylosing spondylitis. Similar data were also reported for psoriatic arthritis in which, in addition, a significant reduction in the progression of erosive damages was widely described. Furthermore, although only a few studies are available, very interesting results have been obtained in patients suffering from undifferentiated spondyloarthropathies and severe enthesitis.

Etanercept (ETN) and other anti-TNF-α agents have revolutionised the management of spondyloarthropathies (SpA). With the increasingly widespread and prolonged use of these drugs an assessment of their long-term safety is extremely important. An additional concern regarding biological agents is their higher costs compared with conventional drugs. We examined safety data regarding ETN from clinical reports, clinical trials, review articles, databases and registries. In addition, evidence was reviewed about the cost effectiveness of ETN in the treatment of patients with SpA. Our review suggests that ETN is well tolerated as long-term, continuous treatment of SpA with a favourable risk-benefit ratio maintained from 4 to 5 years. Diversity in structure and mode of action could explain some differences in the safety profile of ETN with respect to the other anti-TNF agents. In particular, ETN is less immunogenic and is less likely to induce tuberculosis re-activation than the other TNF-α antagonists. Although ETN is considerably more expensive than conventional therapy, it reduces direct and indirect costs associated to SpA by improving disease activity and quality of life. Recent pharmacoeconomic studies have demonstrated its cost-effectiveness in the treatment of SpA.

Given the availability of novel biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), various national scientific societies have developed specific recommendations in order to assist rheumatologists in prescribing these drugs. The Italian Society for Rheumatology (Società Italiana di Reumatologia, SIR) decided to update its recommendations and, to this end, a systematic literature review was carried out and the evidence derived from it was discussed and summarised as expert opinions. Levels of evidence, strength of recommendations and levels of agreement were reported. The recommendations reported are intended to help prescribing rheumatologists to optimise the use of biologic agents in patients with RA seen in everyday practice; they are not to be considered as a regulatory rule.

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of etanercept on axial manifestations of a group of patients with established psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: This was a multicentre observational study. PsA was classified based on the CASPAR criteria. Inclusion criteria were refractory PsA with axial manifestations and suitability for anti TNF-α therapy. Effectiveness was defined according to the ASAS response criteria (BASDAI: 50% relative or absolute change of 20mm and expert opinion in favour of continuation), and on the improvements of BASFI, anthropometric measures, PASI, ESR and CRP at 12 months. PASI 50 and 75 were also assessed, as well as the ACR20 and ACR50 response criteria for patients with peripheral arthritis. Comparisons between baseline and after 12-month treatment were done using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for the end-points considered., Results: The study included 32 patients (25/7 M/F; median age 51yrs; 25th-75th percentiles: 34.5-58.7; median disease duration 14.5 yrs; 25th-75th percentiles: 9.2-17.00). Effectiveness of etanercept was observed in 72% of patients for the BASDAI (p<0.001), in 68% for the BASFI (p<0.001), in 76% for ESR (p<0.001) and in 68% of patients for CRP (p<0.01). The PASI improved in 72% of patients treated (p<0.0001), while PASI 50 and PASI 75 was reached in 81% and 55% of patients, respectively. ACR 20 and 50 was reached in 78 and 56% of patients with peripheral involvement respectively., Conclusions: The present study has shown that etanercept is effective on axial manifestations of established PsA, confirming the positive effects of anti TNF-α therapy on clinical manifestations of the disease.