Search

The development of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has been a breakthrough in rheumatology. In this article, the general principles of bDMARD-treatment will be described based on 2 patient cases. Most bDMARDs inhibit cytokines: signaling molecules that transmit messages within the immune system. Because specific cytokines play a dominant role in different rheumatic diseases, this determines which agent is used for which indication. Another group of bDMARDs targets B cells, and is increasingly used for the treatment of SLE and vasculitis. Finally, we will briefly discuss side effects and precautions to provide an optimal overview for understanding rheumatologic bDMARD-treatment.

Objectives: In RA, the relationship between autoantibody status and treatment response to MTX remains unclear. We investigated the association between autoantibody status and early remission in newly diagnosed RA patients treated with MTX using real-world data., Methods: RA-patients initially treated with MTX were selected from an international observational database (METEOR). Patients were stratified into autoantibody-positive (RF- and/or ACPA-positive) or autoantibody negative (RF- and ACPA-negative). The effect of autoantibody status on the chance of achieving remission within 3 to 6 months was analysed using Cox-proportional hazards regression., Results: Data from 1826 RA patients were available for analysis. DAS remission was achieved in 17% (318/1826). This was similar in autoantibody-positive [17% (282/1629)] and -negative patients [18% (36/197)]. Hence, autoantibody positivity was not associated with remission [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.57, 1.38]. Similar findings were found when stratified for MTX monotherapy (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41, 1.37) or combination treatment (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37, 1.54). Good physical function (HAQ < 0.5) was achieved in 33% (530/1590) of all patients. Autoantibody-positivity was also not associated with HAQ < 0.5 (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71, 1.57)., Conclusion: Autoantibody status is not associated with early remission in newly diagnosed RA-patients receiving MTX. This indicates that MTX is effective as an initial treatment strategy regardless of autoantibody status.

Objectives: To compare the prevalence of and predictors for sustained drug-free remission in two cohorts of patients with recent-onset RA treated with DAS-driven therapy or non-DAS-driven therapy., Methods: Sustained drug-free remission was assessed after 5 years of follow-up in 508 patients treated with DAS-driven therapy (DAS ≤ 2.4) in a randomized treatment cohort, and in 424 patients who received non-DAS-driven therapy in a prospective inception cohort. The design of the DAS-driven cohort required systematic joint assessments with DAS-driven restart of therapy. Predictors for remission were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression in each cohort separately and in a combined multivariate logistic regression analysis corrected for propensity scores, including a sensitivity analysis on patients receiving initial monotherapy., Results: Patients in the DAS-driven cohort had more active disease at baseline, but the prevalence of sustained drug-free remission was similar after DAS-driven (9.8%) and non-DAS-driven therapy (10.6%). Among patients with ACPA, drug-free remission was more frequently achieved after DAS-driven than after non-DAS-driven therapy (5.4 vs. 2.1%, OR = 2.68, 95% CI 0.97, 7.43). Absence of ACPA and short symptom duration were independent predictors for sustained drug-free remission in both cohorts. Initial treatment choice and inclusion period were not predictive. The sensitivity analysis yielded comparable results., Conclusion: Retrospectively comparing a DAS-driven to a non-DAS-driven therapy cohort, the occurrence and predictors of sustained drug-free remission were similar. The DAS-driven cohort had a more unfavourable prognosis. DAS-driven therapy may improve the chance of sustained drug-free remission in ACPA-positive patients with recent-onset RA.

Objective: During the last decade, rheumatologists have learned to initiate disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) early to improve the outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the effect of delay in assessment by a rheumatologist on the outcome of RA has scarcely been explored. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between delay in assessment by a rheumatologist, rates of joint destruction, and probability of achieving DMARD-free remission in patients with RA. Patient characteristics associated with components of delay (by the patient, by the general practitioner [GP], and overall) were assessed., Methods: A total of 1,674 early arthritis patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic cohort were evaluated for patient delay, GP delay, and total delay in assessment by a rheumatologist. Among 598 RA patients, associations between total delay, achievement of sustained DMARD-free remission, and the rate of joint destruction over 6 years followup were determined., Results: The median patient, GP, and total delays in seeing a rheumatologist among patients with early arthritis were 2.4 weeks, 8.0 weeks, and 13.7 weeks, respectively. Among all diagnoses, those diagnosed as having RA or spondylarthritis had the longest total delay (18 weeks). Among the RA patients, 69% were assessed in ≥12 weeks; this was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.87 for not achieving DMARD-free remission and a 1.3 times higher rate of joint destruction over 6 years, as compared with assessment in <12 weeks. Older age, female sex, gradual symptom onset, involvement of the small joints, lower levels of C-reactive protein, and the presence of autoantibodies were associated with longer total delay., Conclusion: Only 31% of the RA patients were assessed in <12 weeks of symptom onset. Assessment in <12 weeks is associated with less joint destruction and a higher chance of achieving DMARD-free remission as compared with a longer delay in assessment. These results imply that attempts to diminish the delay in seeing a rheumatologist will improve disease outcome in patients with RA., (Copyright © 2010 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Remission has become an attainable goal of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, especially since the advent of biologic antirheumatic therapy. Because little is known about patients who achieve disease remission with conventional treatment, we used 2 large independent inception cohorts to study the prevalence of and predictive factors for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-free sustained remission after treatment with conventional therapy., Methods: Remission of disease was assessed in 454 patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) and in 895 patients from the British Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (ERAS) who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria for the classification of RA and were treated with conventional therapy. Sustained DMARD-free remission was defined as fulfilling the following criteria for at least 1 year: 1) no current DMARD use, 2) no swollen joints, and 3) classification as DMARD-free remission by the patient's rheumatologist. Predictive factors were identified by Cox regression analysis., Results: Sustained DMARD-free remission was achieved by 68 of 454 patients (15.0%) in the Leiden EAC and by 84 of 895 patients (9.4%) in the ERAS. Six factors were associated with sustained DMARD-free remission in both cohorts: acute onset, short symptom duration before inclusion, not smoking, little radiographic damage at baseline, absence of IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF), and absence of HLA shared epitope alleles. In the ERAS, low disease activity at baseline was also predictive of remission. Multivariate analyses revealed symptom duration and the absence of autoantibodies (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 and IgM-RF) as independent predictors., Conclusion: Sustained DMARD-free remission in RA patients treated with conventional therapy is not uncommon. Symptom duration at presentation and the absence of autoantibodies are associated with sustained DMARD-free remission.

Findings from basic research in combination with precise clinical observations of the disease course in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have led to the development of a multistage model to explain the pathophysiology of RA. Different cellular and soluble mediators, which play principal roles at different phases of the disease, have been identified. New therapeutic agents, which specifically target these factors, now allow us to intervene at several levels of the pathogenesis. This has already resulted in significant improvements for patients suffering from RA, and the development of new promising agents continues at a high pace. However, many questions concerning the optimal use of the new therapies remain unanswered. Combined efforts of basic research and clinical trials investigating the optimal timing and combination of the new treatments will be necessary to allow them to achieve their full potential and to result in the maximum benefit for patients.