Search

Background and Aim: Accurate information on the epidemiology of hepatitis C and B infection is mandatory to establish a national/regional plan. We aim to update the prevalence of hepatitis C and B infection in Catalonia using point-of-care tests to analyze the risk factors related and to implement a linkage-to-care circuit., Methods: This is a community-based study. A random list of adult individuals was retrieved from censuses of primary care centers. Point-of-care tests for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and a questionnaire for risk factor assessment were performed. Positive results were validated and a circuit for linkage-to-care was established., Results: A total of 3328 individuals were included. The anti-HCV and HBsAg overall prevalence were lower than expected [1.02%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.39; and 0.52%, 95% CI 0.26-0.77, respectively]. Anti-HCV positive subjects were mostly (88%) autochthonous. The prevalence increased with age; only 12% were under age 40. The associated risk factors were drug use, blood transfusion, relative with HCV, and diabetes. Notably, the prevalence of active infection was only 0.49% (95% CI 0.23-0.74), 40% less than previously reported, reflecting the impact of direct acting antiviral therapy. Differently, HBsAg positive subjects were mostly foreign migrants (53%) with no other risk factors. Despite the implementation of a linkage-to-care circuit, one third of HBsAg positive subjects were lost., Conclusions: The prevalence of HCV infection was lower than previously reported, showing a strong impact of direct acting antiviral therapy in the last years. Because of hepatitis B universal vaccination, HBV infection in Catalonia is mainly associated with migrant population. Linkage-to-care in patients with hepatitis B was challenging and warrants additional efforts., (© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

A percentage of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients fail direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based treatment regimens, often because of drug resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). The aim of this study was to characterize the resistance profile of a large cohort of patients failing DAA-based treatments, and investigate the relationship between HCV subtype and failure, as an aid to optimizing management of these patients. A new, standardized HCV-RAS testing protocol based on deep sequencing was designed and applied to 220 previously subtyped samples from patients failing DAA treatment, collected in 39 Spanish hospitals. The majority had received DAA-based interferon (IFN) α-free regimens; 79% had failed sofosbuvir-containing therapy. Genomic regions encoding the nonstructural protein (NS) 3, NS5A, and NS5B (DAA target regions) were analyzed using subtype-specific primers. Viral subtype distribution was as follows: genotype (G) 1, 62.7%; G3a, 21.4%; G4d, 12.3%; G2, 1.8%; and mixed infections 1.8%. Overall, 88.6% of patients carried at least 1 RAS, and 19% carried RAS at frequencies below 20% in the mutant spectrum. There were no differences in RAS selection between treatments with and without ribavirin. Regardless of the treatment received, each HCV subtype showed specific types of RAS. Of note, no RAS were detected in the target proteins of 18.6% of patients failing treatment, and 30.4% of patients had RAS in proteins that were not targets of the inhibitors they received. HCV patients failing DAA therapy showed a high diversity of RAS. Ribavirin use did not influence the type or number of RAS at failure. The subtype-specific pattern of RAS emergence underscores the importance of accurate HCV subtyping. The frequency of "extra-target" RAS suggests the need for RAS screening in all three DAA target regions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare that no public or private company has had any role in the study design, data collection, experimental work, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Roche Diagnostics S.L. provided support in the form of a salary for one of the authors [Josep Gregori], but the company did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No other Competing Interests to declare. Thus, our adherence to Antiviral Research policies on sharing data and materials is not altered., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Limited data are available on the effectiveness and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapies in the real world for HCV-infected patients with comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV (3D/2D regimen) with or without ribavirin (RBV) in HCV or HCV/HIV co-infected patients with GT1/GT4 and CKD (IIIb-V stages), including those under hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in routine clinical practice in Spain in 2015., Material and Methods: Non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter data collection study in 31 Spanish sites. Socio-demographic, clinical variables, study treatment characteristics, effectiveness and tolerability data were collected from medical records., Results: Data from 135 patients with a mean age (SD) of 58.3 (11.4) years were analyzed: 92.6% GT1 (81.6% GT1b and 17.6% GT1a) and 7.4% GT4, 14 (10.4%) HIV/HCV co-infected, 19.0% with fibrosis F3 and 28.1% F4 by FibroScan®, 52.6% were previously treated with pegIFN and RBV. 11.1%, 14.8% and 74.1% of patients had CKD stage IIIb, IV and V respectively. 68.9% of patients were on hemodialysis; 8.9% on peritoneal dialysis and 38.5% had history of renal transplant. A total of 125 (96.2%) of 135 patients were treated with 3D, 10 (7.4%) with 2D and 30.4% received RBV. The overall intention-to-treat (ITT) sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) was 92.6% (125/135) and the overall modified-ITT (mITT) SVR12 was 99.2% (125/126). The SVR12 rates (ITT) per sub-groups were: HCV mono-infected (91.7%), HCV/HIV co-infected (100%), GT1 (92.0%), GT4 (100%), CKD stage IIIb (86.7%), stage IV (95%) and stage V (93%). Among the 10 non-SVR there was only 1 virologic failure (0.7%); 4 patients had missing data due lost to follow up (3.0%) and 5 patients discontinued 3D/2D regimen (3.7%): 4 due to severe adverse events (including 3 deaths) and 1 patient´s decision., Conclusions: These results have shown that 3D/2D regimens are effective and tolerable in patients with advanced CKD including those in dialysis with GT 1 or 4 chronic HCV mono-infection and HIV/HCV coinfection in a real-life cohort. The overall SVR12 rates were 92.6% (ITT) and 99.2% (mITT) without clinically relevant changes in eGFR until 12 weeks post-treatment. These results are consistent with those reported in clinical trials., Competing Interests: MCL has served as consultant for AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, BMS and Gilead; MRB has received grant Research from Gilead Science, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead and MSD; MR has received speaker fees from AbbVie; MJDM has served as speaker for AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, and MSD and as a consultant for MSD; MAS has served as advisor for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, MSD and Roche; CAN has served as consultant for AbbVie and Bayer, and has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Gilead; SMS has served as speaker for AbbVie and MSD; AC has served as consultant for Janssen, and has received speaker fees from Gilead and Janssen; MD has received grant support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead and Merck, Sharp & Dhome; FGR has served as speaker for AbbVie, Gilead and BMS; MLM has served as a speaker for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD and ViiV; as a consultant for AbbVie, BMS and Janssen and has received research funding from FIPSE 36465/03, FIPSE 36680/07.-NEAT IG5 (NEAT is a project funded by the European Union under the 6th Framework programme) contract number LSHP-CT-2006–037570; MAC has served as a consultant for Gilead and and ViiV healthcare, and has received speaker fees from Janssens, Gilead, ViiV Healthcare; MMA reports personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, AbbVie and ABBOTT Laboratories, outside the submitted work; AR has received consultancy and speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences and Merck Sharp & Dohme; JM has received honoraria, speaker fees, consultant fees or funds for research from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Roche and ViiV; GB has served as speaker for Nutricia and Palex Medical, and has participated in mentoring for Nefralia and Vifor Fresenius; EGP has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Gilead; LGB has served as consultant for AbbVie and Intercept and has received speaker fees from Gilead and MSD; AA, RMG, CB, TAE, MLG, BPL, LIC, SB, LB, JGS, MJP, IMG, LM, LIdlS, ML and JEL don’t have a financial interest or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this paper; CdA and AM are paid employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background & Aims: The efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis C. We aimed to evaluate the impact of DAA therapy on the composition of the liver transplant (LT) waiting list and the early post-transplant survival., Methods: We evaluated all patients admitted to the waiting list for a primary LT between 1st January 2008 and 31st of December 2016 in Catalonia, Spain. Time span was divided into two periods according to the availability of different antiviral therapies: 2008-2013 (interferon-based therapies) and 2014-2016 (DAA). Changes in the indications of LT and the aetiology of liver disease, as well as post-LT patient survival, were evaluated according to the year of inclusion and transplantation, respectively., Results: We included 1,483 patients. Admissions in the waiting list for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease decreased significantly, from 47% in 2008-2013 to 35% in 2014-2016 (p <0.001), particularly because of a reduction in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. In contrast, NASH-related inclusions increased from 4% to 7% (p = 0.003). Three-year post-LT patient survival increased significantly in the second period in the whole cohort (82% vs. 91%, p = 0.002), because of better survival in anti-HCV positive patients (76% vs. 91%, p = 0.001), but not in anti-HCV negative patients (88% vs. 91% p = 0.359). Anti-HCV positive serology, the time period of 2008-2013 and higher donor age were independently associated with post-LT mortality in the whole cohort; while time period and donor age were independently associated with post-LT mortality in anti-HCV positive recipients., Conclusions: The high efficacy of DAAs is associated with significant changes in the composition of the LT waiting list and, more importantly, results in improved post-transplant survival., Lay Summary: The efficacy of the new direct-acting antivirals is associated with a significant improvement in survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation because of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease. In addition, it has decreased the number of patients with hepatitis C that need a liver transplant., (Copyright © 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Hepatitis C (HCV) therapy with Sofosbuvir (SOF)/Simeprevir (SMV) in clinical trials and real-world clinical practice, showed high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in non-cirrhotic genotype (GT)-1 and GT-4 patients. These results were slightly lower in cirrhotic patients. We investigated real-life effectiveness and safety of SOF/SMV with or without ribavirin (RBV) in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients., Methods: This collaborative multicentre study included data from 968 patients with cirrhosis infected with HCV-GT1 or 4, treated with SOF/SMV±RBV in 30 centres across Spain between January-2014 and December-2015. Demographic, clinical, virological and safety data were analysed., Results: Overall SVR was 92.3%; the majority of patients were treated with RBV (62%) for 12 weeks (92.4%). No significant differences in SVR were observed between genotypes (GT1a:94.3%; GT1b:91.7%; GT4:91.1%). Those patients with more advanced liver disease (Child B/C, MELD≥10) or portal hypertension (platelet count≤100×10 9 /L, transient elastography≥21 Kpa) showed significantly lower SVR rates (84.4%-91.9%) than patients with less advanced liver disease (93.8%-95.9%, P<.01 in all cases). In the multivariate analysis, the use of RBV, female gender, baseline albumin≥35 g/L, MELD<10 and lack of exposure to a triple therapy regimen were independent predictors of SVR (P<.05). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and SAE-associated discontinuation events occurred in 5.9% and 2.6%., Conclusions: In this large cohort of cirrhotic patients managed in the real-world setting in Spain, SOF/SMV±RBV yielded to excellent SVR rates, especially in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. In addition, this combination showed to be safe, with low rates of SAEs and early discontinuations., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Interferon-free therapies have an improved safety and efficacy profile. However, data in elderly patients, who have frequently advanced liver disease, associated comorbidities, and use concomitant medications are scarce. The im of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of all-oral regimens in elderly patients in real-life clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients aged ≥65 years receiving interferon-free regimens within the Spanish National Registry (Hepa-C)., Results: Data of 1,252 patients were recorded. Of these, 955 (76%) were aged 65-74 years, 211 (17%) were aged 75-79 years, and 86 (7%) were aged ≥80 years at the start of antiviral therapy. HCV genotype-1b was predominant (88%) and 48% were previous non-responders. A significant proportion of patients had cirrhosis (922; 74%), of whom 11% presented decompensated liver disease. The most used regimens were SOF/LDV (33%), 3D (28%), and SOF/SMV (26%). Ribavirin was added in 49% of patients. Overall, the sustained virological response (SVR12) rate was 94% without differences among the three age categories. Albumin ≤3.5 g/dl was the only independent negative predictor of response (0.25 (0.15-0.41); P<0.01). Regarding tolerability, the rate of severe adverse events increased with age category (8.8, 13, and 14%; P=0.04). In addition, the main predictors of mortality (2.3%) were age ≥75 years (2.59 (1.16-5.83); P =0.02) and albumin ≤3.5 (17 (6.3-47); P <0.01)., Conclusions: SVR rates with interferon-free regimens in elderly patients are high and comparable to the general population. Baseline low albumin levels (≤3.5 g/dl) was the only predictor of treatment failure. Importantly, the rate of severe adverse events and death increased with age. Elderly patients (≥75 years) or those with advanced liver disease (albumin ≤3.5) presented higher mortality. Thus a careful selection of patients for antiviral treatment is recommended.

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are highly effective and well tolerated in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis. However, fewer data are available in patients with more advanced liver disease. Our retrospective, noninterventional, national, multicenter study in patients from the Spanish Hepa-C registry investigated the effectiveness and safety of interferon-free DAA regimens in patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis, in routine practice (all currently approved regimens were registered). Patients transplanted during treatment or within 12 weeks of completing treatment were excluded. Among 843 patients with cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh [CTP] class A, n = 564; CTP class B/C, n = 175), 90% achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Significant differences in SVR12 and relapse rates were observed between CTP class A and CTP class B/C patients (94% versus 78%, and 4% versus 14%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were more common in CTP class B/C versus CTP class A patients (50% versus 12%, respectively; P < 0.001). Incident decompensation was the most common serious adverse event (7% overall). Death rate during the study period was 16/843 (2%), significantly higher among CTP class B/C versus CTP class A patients (6.4% versus 0.9%; P < 0.001). Baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score alone (cut-off 18) was the best predictor of survival., Conclusion: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis receiving DAAs present lower response rates and experience more SAEs. In this setting, a MELD score ≥18 may help clinicians to identify those patients with a higher risk of complications and to individualize treatment decisions. (Hepatology 2017;65:1810-1822)., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Patients with HCV genotype 3 (GT3) infection and cirrhosis are currently the most difficult to cure. We report our experience with sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (SOF+DCV) or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), with or without ribavirin (RBV) in clinical practice in this population. This was a multicenter observational study including cirrhotic patients infected by HCV GT3, treated with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (May 2014-October 2015). In total, 208 patients were included: 98 (47%) treatment-experienced, 42 (20%) decompensated and 55 (27%) MELD score >10. In 131 (63%), treatment was SOF+DCV and in 77 (37%), SOF/LDV. Overall, 86% received RBV. RBV addition and extension to 24 weeks was higher in the SOF/LDV group (95% vs 80%, P=.002 and 83% vs 72%, P=.044, respectively). A higher percentage of decompensated patients were treated with DCV than LDV (25% vs 12%, P=.013). Overall, SVR12 was 93.8% (195/208): 94% with SOF+DCV and 93.5% with SOF/LDV. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of decompensated patients. Eleven treatment failures: 10 relapses and one breakthrough. RBV addition did not improve SVR (RR: 1.08; P=.919). The single factor associated with failure to achieve SVR was platelet count <75×10E9/mL (RR: 3.50, P=.019). In patients with MELD <10, type of NS5A inhibitor did not impact on SVR12 (94% vs 97%; adjusted RR: 0.49). Thirteen patients (6.3%) had serious adverse events, including three deaths (1.4%) and one therapy discontinuation (0.5%), higher in decompensated patients (16.7% vs 3.6%, P<.006). In patients with GT3 infection and cirrhosis, SVR12 rates were high with both SOF+DCV and SOF/LDV, with few serious adverse events., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: The development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) is a major step forward in the treatment of hepatitis C (HCV). The aims of the study were to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of DAAs in kidney transplant (KT) recipients., Methods: Hepa-C is a Spanish registry of patients treated with DAAs in which clinical, virological and analytical data were prospectively included. We report on the data from 103 KT recipients who received DAAs., Results: The most commonly used DAAs combinations were sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (n=59, 57%) and sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (n=18, 17%). Ribavirin was used in 41% of patients. Sustained viral response after 12weeks (SVR12) rate was 98%. Grade 2 or 3 anemia appeared in 14 (33%) of patients receiving ribavirin and in 9 (15%) without (p=0.03). There were three episodes of acute humoral graft rejection. No patient discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Importantly, 57 (55%) patients required immunosuppression dose adjustment. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean level of serum creatinine, eGFR and proteinuria before and after treatment. Nonetheless, seventeen (16%) patients experienced renal dysfunction (increase in serum creatinine >25%) during antiviral therapy, of whom 65% were cirrhotic in comparison with only 29% cirrhotic patients who did not develop significant renal dysfunction (p=0.004)., Conclusions: Antiviral therapy with DAAs was highly efficacious and safe in KT recipients. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients, most of them cirrhotic, developed mild allograft dysfunction and a significant proportion of patients required immunosuppression dose adjustment, warranting a close follow-up during therapy., Lay Summary: Infection by hepatitis C virus is often found in kidney transplant patients and its presence increases mortality and graft failure. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the new direct-acting hepatitis C antivirals in this population, in which previous information is scarce. Our data shows that, as occurs in the non-transplant setting, new anti-HCV antivirals are highly efficacious kidney transplant patients. Overall, this therapy is also quite safe, although worsening of renal function is observed in 16% of patients warranting a close follow-up observation of graft function during antiviral therapy., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an opportunistic infection frequently found after solid organ transplantation, and it contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity. CMV-seronegative recipients of grafts from CMV-seropositive donors have the highest risk of CMV disease. The most appropriate strategy for preventing CMV disease in this population is a matter of active debate. In this study, we compared prophylaxis and preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+ /R-) liver recipients. To this end, we selected a retrospective cohort of liver recipients (1992-2009) for analysis. D+ /R- patients were identified from the liver transplant program database. Eighty of 878 consecutive liver recipients (9%) were D+ /R-. Six of these patients died within 30 days of transplantation and were excluded. Thirty-five of the remaining D+ /R- patients (47%) received prophylaxis, and 39 patients (53%) followed a preemptive strategy based on CMV antigenemia surveillance. Fifty-four (73%) were men, the median age was 49 years (range = 15-68 years), and the mean follow-up was 68 months (range = 8-214 months). The baseline characteristics and the initial immunosuppressive regimens were similar for the 2 groups. Ganciclovir or valganciclovir was the antiviral drug used initially in both strategy groups. CMV disease occurred more frequently among D+ /R- liver recipients receiving preemptive therapy (33.3% versus 8.6% for the prophylaxis group, P = 0.01), whereas late-onset CMV disease was found only in patients receiving prophylaxis (5.7% versus 0% for the preemptive therapy group, P = 0.22). No significant differences in acute allograft rejection, other opportunistic infections, or case fatality rates were observed. According to our data, prophylaxis was more effective than preemptive therapy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Introduction: At present, there is little published information on the outcome of treatment with pegylated interferon (Peg-IF alpha 2a) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected hemodialysis patients awaiting renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of Peg-IF alpha 2a in this population., Patients and Methods: Twelve noncirrhotic HCV-infected patients (10 men, 50 +/- 8 years of age, genotype 1b 84%), were prescribed Peg-IF alpha 2a, at 135 microg/wk for 48 weeks. Liver biopsy was performed in 11 of 12 cases., Results: Six patients completed 48 weeks of treatment, with one end of treatment response (ETR), two sustained viral responses (SVRs), and three HCV relapses. Treatment was shorter in the six remaining patients: two cases 24 weeks (one due to medical reasons with relapse, one due to nonresponse), one patient chose to discontinue at 14 weeks (with relapse), one patient died of stroke at 10 weeks, and in two additional patients interferon was withdrawn at 18 weeks because of severe anemia (SVR) and at 26 weeks due to prolonged fever (relapse). Other secondary treatment-related events included anemia (requiring transfusion in two patients and major erythropoietin administration in six), and fever in four patients., Conclusions: Peg-IF had limited efficacy in this group, with ETR in 83%, SVR in only 25%, and recurrence in 50%. Tolerance was moderate, with 4/12 (33%) discontinuing treatment due to adverse events, personal decision, or death. Large randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the role of Peg-IF treatment in this population.

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding adefovir to lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients resistant to Ramivudine., Patients and Methods: Among 17 studied patients, 7 had chronic active HBV infection and 10 were posttransplant with HBV infection (9 with de novo HBV). They received lamivudine plus adefovir therapy for 2 years. We assessed reductions in serum HBV-DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, loss of HBeAg (in HBeAg+ cases), and HBsAg clearance., Results: A virological response, as defined by HBV-DNA below the cut off by hybridization, was observed in 12 (70.6%) patients and loss of HBeAg in 4 (44.4%) of the 9 initially HBeAg-positive cases. A biochemical response, defined as a decreased serum ALT to the normal range, occurred in 4 (26.7%) patients. Median serum creatinine increased in 3 of 15 (20%) patients, excluding those on hemodialysis. There were two noteworthy cases of sustained HBsAg seroconversion with adefovir (11.8%): one patient with de novo HBV infection posttransplantation and positive hepatitis C virus-RNA serology, and one patient with decompensated HBV cirrhosis in whom viral replication ceased, making him eligible for transplantation., Conclusions: Currently, adefovir is an effective rescue therapy that broadens the existing range of options for patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection, particularly those with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting a liver graft, and those with recurrent posttransplantation HBV. The relatively small biochemical response seen in these patients may be attributable to the high prevalence of concomitant hepatitis C virus infection (41%).

Objectives: Interferon-alpha (IFN) may have undesirable effects on a functioning graft. The aim of this study was to evaluate IFN treatment in kidney transplant candidates during the hemodialysis period as well as the results after transplantation., Methods: A total of 29 noncirrhotic hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (based on long-term rise in ALT, HCV serology, HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction methods, and histological evidence) were included. Tolerability to IFN treatment, pre- and posttransplantation therapeutic results, and long-term outcome were recorded. IFN regimen consisted of 3 million units (MU) times per week after hemodialysis sessions for 6 months, followed by 1.5 MU after each hemodialysis session for an additional 6 months. All patients gave informed consent for participation., Results: IFN therapy was fairly well tolerated. Adverse effects due to IFN toxicity, renal disease, or causes related to the immunological properties of IFN were observed in 24% of patients. At the end of treatment, ALT had normalized in 23/28 patients (82.1%), and HCV RNA had cleared in 23/28 patients (82.1%). During follow-up, HCV RNA was persistently negative in 18 patients (64%, including transplant recipients). A total of 14 patients (nine HCV RNA-negative) received a kidney transplant. Mean follow-up after the procedure was 41 +/- 28 months. In all, 12 patients had a functioning graft, one had acute vascular rejection, and one died of carcinoma. All transplanted patients maintained normal ALT levels, and eight remained HCV RNA-negative., Conclusions: Treatment results in our study population were better than those observed in the general population. The long-term response achieved, which was maintained after transplantation, supports the use of IFN for HCV hepatitis in kidney transplant candidates under hemodialysis.