Search

Safety, efficacy, and predictor factors of sustained-virological-response after 24 weeks of new direct-acting antivirals were evaluated in hepatitis C virus patients with different stages of hepatic disease. 260 patients, median age 60 years, of whom 48.1% cirrhotics, 17.7% liver transplant recipients, and 45.7% naïve were treated with Sofosbuvir+Ribavirine, Sofosbuvir+Simeprevir±Ribavirine, Sofosbuvir+Daclatasvir± Ribavirine, Sofosbuvir+Ledispavir±Ribavirine, Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+Ribavirine and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+Dasabuvir±Ribavirine. Therapy outcomes, hematochemical parameters, viral replication, genotype, and resistance-associated-mutations were analyzed retrospectively. Sustained virological response was 90.4% in the whole population, 83.2% in cirrhotics, 85% in patients with previous virological failure, 93.6% in patients >60 years, and 95.6% in liver transplant recipients. SVR24 for each drug regimen was 75% Sofosbuvir+Ribavirine, 80.4% Sofosbuvir+Simeprevir±Ribavirine, 94.3% Sofosbuvir+Daclatasvir±Ribavirine, 98.7% Sofosbuvir+Ledispavir±Ribavirine, 100% Ombitasvir/ Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+Ribavirine and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+Dasabuvir±Ribavirine. The highest sustained virological response rates were obtained with genotype-1b (95.9%). Twenty-five patients, mostly cirrhotics or suffering from severe liver complications, manifested relapse (84%), breakthrough (12%), or non-response (4%). Mild side effects were observed in 41.1% of patients. Model-for-End-Liver- Disease score <10 and alanine aminotransferase ≤20 U/L at week 8 of therapy proved positive predictors of sustained virological response. Direct-acting antiviral therapy is efficacious and safe even in patients with advanced liver disease and/ or previous virological failure; Model-for-End-Liver-Disease <10 and alanine aminotransferase reduction during therapy were found to be reliable predicting markers of sustained-virological-response.

Aim: To evaluate the potential value of using a serological assay to quantitate the hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCV-Ag) when monitoring patients with chronic hepatitis C being treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs)., Methods: Ninety-six patients treated with DAAs, either alone (91) or in combination with PEG interferon (5), were tested for HCV-RNA and for HCV-Ag at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 during treatment and 12 weeks after completion. The concordance and correlation between the viral parameters as well as the respective kinetics during and after treatment were evaluated., Results: A sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 82 patients (91%), whereas 11 relapsed (R) and 1 showed a virological breakthrough while receiving treatment. HCV-RNA and HCV-Ag showed good concordance (kappa = 0.62) and correlation. No significant differences between SVR and R was observed in either assay at 2 and 4 weeks after the start of treatment. At 8 weeks, HCV-Ag showed higher accuracy than HCV-RNA (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.55) and there was a significantly greater decrease from baseline in SVR than in R (4.01 vs. 3.36 log10; p<0.05)., Conclusions: Monitoring during treatment with DAAs by using either HCV-RNA or HCV-Ag has only a limited predictive value for SVR. Since those assays are equivalent for identifying a virological relapse, HCV-Ag may be preferred from an economical and organizational perspective.

Background: Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with IFN-free direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies has recently emerged as a potential risk. Given the potential burden of this issue, further data are needed to establish its actual clinical impact., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to analyze the occurrence of HBV reactivation in a cohort of CHC patient treated with DAAs in routine clinical practice., Study Design: Consecutive CHC patients with different genotypes, treated with DAA between January 2015 and January 2016 were included in the study. Subjects had been tested for HBsAg and anti-HBc antibodies before antiviral therapy. HBV-DNA levels were examined in anti-HBc positive patients at baseline and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Post-treatment HBsAg determination was performed in case of HBV-DNA positivity. Serum anti-HBs kinetics was analysed in anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive subjects., Results: A cohort of 137 consecutive HCV patients treated with IFN-free regimens in routine clinical practice was evaluated. From this cohort, plasma samples of 44 subjects with positive serology for HBV (anti-HBc positive) were tested for HBV-DNA levels at baseline and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Two of them were HBsAg-positive, while the others had signs of a past HBV exposure (HBsAg-negative±HBsAb-positive). No reactivation was found in HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative subjects. In the two HBsAg-positive, one experienced an increase in HBV-DNA levels of ≥2 log 10 IU/mL during treatment. However, the reactivation was without clinical impact and, most important, was followed by HBsAg loss., Conclusions: Based on our experience, a past HBV infection seems not to be a condition predisposing to HBV reactivation. On the contrary, in HBsAg-positive subjects not in suppressive treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs, regular monitoring of HBV-DNA during and after DAA treatment should be considered., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: In patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving Peg interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) who do not achieve ≥ 2 log-reduction in HCV-RNA at week 12 (null responders, NR) and in those with ≥ 2 log-decrease but detectable at week 24 (partial responders, PR) the probability to achieve the sustained virological response (SVR) is almost null. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of individualized schedule of progressively increased RBV doses in the setting of PEG-IFN/RBV treatment., Material and Methods: PR or NR to PEG-IFN/RBV instead of discontinuing treatment were enrolled to receive increasing doses of RBV until a target theoretical concentration ([tRBV]) of ≥ 15 μmol/L (by pharmacokinetic formula based on glomerular filtration rate). HCV-RNA was assessed every 4 weeks and, if detectable, RBV dose was gradually increased until negativization. Twelve weeks later, patients with detectable HCV-RNA discontinued therapy while those with undetectable HCV-RNA continued for further 48 weeks., Results: Twenty genotype-1 patients (8 NR and 12 PR) were enrolled. After 12 weeks 9 (45%) were still HCV-RNA positive and were discontinued, while remaining 11 had undetectable HCV-RNA. One stopped treatment for side effects. Ten completed treatment. Five (all PR) achieved SVR. Side effects incidence was similar to that observed during PEG-IFN/RBV., Conclusions: In conclusion, RBV high doses, according to individualized schedule, increase SVR in PR on a similar extent to that of triple therapy but without increase of side effects. Such treatment should be considered in PR with no access or intolerant to protease inhibitors (PI).

Background: An early drop of HCV-RNA levels is useful in assessing response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C; the first recommended time point is 4 weeks after the start of therapy., Objectives: We evaluated retrospectively HCV-RNA and HCVAg levels at different time points to assess the clinical value of an early monitoring., Study Design: Thirty-five patients with chronic hepatitis C infected by genotype 1b and consecutively enrolled in an open-label study on PegIFN plus Ribavirin and/or ketoprofene were tested for HCV-RNA (real-time PCR) and HCVAg (ARCHITECT) at baseline and after 1 and 2 days and 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the start of treatment. Treatment response was assessed according to the EASL consensus criteria., Results: In the 17 sustained responders (SR) the median log decrease of HCV-RNA and HCVAg at the different time points was 0.40 and 0.37; 1.36 and 0.84; 1.47 and 0.97; 2.34 and 1.86; 2.51 and 2.32; 3.28 and 2.61, respectively. The best time point to predict SR was 2 weeks after the start of therapy, with a sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of 76.9%, 86.7% and 82.1% for HCV-RNA and 81.8%, 75.0% and 76.8% for HCVAg, respectively., Discussion: An early monitoring is at least equally effective than standard monitoring in predicting response to hepatitis C therapy. The similarity of HCV-RNA and HCVAg kinetics suggests that HCVAg may be useful in the early phases as a trigger to evaluate HCV-RNA levels at earlier time points for a personalized approach to therapy monitoring., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the safety of adding ketoprofen to pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) with or without ribavirin and the effect on viral kinetics, STAT1 activity and expression of 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2'-5'OAS) in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in a phase II study., Methods: Forty-five patients were studied: fifteen were randomized to PEG-IFN plus ribavirin (PR), 16 to PEG-IFN plus ketoprofen and 14 to PR and ketoprofen. The molecular study of IFN-dependent signal transduction was conducted in 9 patients from each group., Results: The combination of ketoprofen and PEG-IFN with or without ribavirin was safe and well tolerated. An early activation of STAT1 was observed in ketoprofen-treated patients, but this activation was less sustained over time. Conversely, ketoprofen plus PEG-IFN and ribavirin induced an early and sustained increase of 2'-5'OAS transcription starting 24 h after the first dose until the 36th wk. These data are consistent with the clinical results, showing a better sustained virological response and a lower relapse rate in patients receiving ketoprofen plus PEG-IFN and ribavirin., Conclusion: The addition of ketoprofen to the standard therapy of chronic hepatitis C should be explored in larger randomized clinical studies.

Background: Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment., Methods: The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-alpha2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-alpha2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks., Results: On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%)., Conclusions: Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.