Search

Background & Aims: Oral antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is well-tolerated and lifesaving, but real-world data on utilization are limited. We examined rates of evaluation and treatment in patients from the REAL-B consortium., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study nested within our retrospective multinational clinical consortium (2000-2021). We determined the proportions of patients receiving adequate evaluation, meeting AASLD treatment criteria, and initiating treatment at any time during the study period. We also identified factors associated with receiving adequate evaluation and treatment using multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: We analyzed 12,566 adult treatment-naïve patients with CHB from 25 centers in 9 countries (mean age 47.1 years, 41.7% female, 96.1% Asian, 49.6% Western region, 8.7% cirrhosis). Overall, 73.3% (9,206 patients) received adequate evaluation. Among the adequately evaluated, 32.6% (3,001 patients) were treatment eligible by AASLD criteria, 83.3% (2,500 patients) of whom were initiated on NAs, with consistent findings in analyses using EASL criteria. On multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, cirrhosis, and ethnicity plus region, female sex was associated with adequate evaluation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, p = 0.004), but female treatment-eligible patients were about 50% less likely to initiate NAs (aOR 0.54, p <0.001). Additionally, the lowest evaluation and treatment rates were among Asian patients from the West, but no difference was observed between non-Asian patients and Asian patients from the East. Asian patients from the West (vs. East) were about 40-50% less likely to undergo adequate evaluation (aOR 0.60) and initiate NAs (aOR 0.54) (both p <0.001)., Conclusions: Evaluation and treatment rates were suboptimal for patients with CHB in both the East and West, with significant sex and ethnic disparities. Improved linkage to care with linguistically competent and culturally sensitive approaches is needed., Impact and Implications: Significant sex and ethnic disparities exist in hepatitis B evaluation and treatment, with female treatment-eligible patients about 50% less likely to receive antiviral treatment and Asian patients from Western regions also about 50% less likely to receive adequate evaluation or treatment compared to Asians from the East (there was no significant difference between Asian patients from the East and non-Asian patients). Improved linkage to care with linguistically competent and culturally sensitive approaches is needed., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon-based treatment was previously the only antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection; however, development of interferon-free, direct-acting antivirals, in 2014, markedly improved treatment efficacy and safety. Treatment indications were expanded to include elderly adults, patients with advanced liver fibrosis, and patients with chronic hepatitis C infection complicated by chronic kidney disease, for whom antiviral therapy had been difficult or contraindicated. The median age of patients with chronic HCV infection in Japan is 70 years, older than in other countries. Because diminished renal function is common in elderly adults, a safe and effective treatment for chronic hepatitis C complicated by chronic kidney disease has been expected in Japan. In addition, the HCV antibody-positive rate is higher in hemodialysis patients than in non-hemodialysis patients in Japan. Numerous studies have reported that direct-acting antivirals are safe and effective for hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis. This review summarizes treatments available in Japanese clinical practice for patients with chronic HCV infection complicated by chronic kidney disease, including hemodialysis patients.

Background: Direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) have markedly improved the effectiveness of anti-viral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. In a phase III trial in Japan, treatment with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a small number of patients with refractory factors. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of G/P, especially among patients with these refractory factors, and the influence of these factors on treatment., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study involving 33 medical institutions, 1439 patients were treated with G/P, and their efficacy, safety, and most frequent adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed., Results: Overall SVR12 rates were 99.1% (1397/1410) in the per-protocol-analysis, and genotype sustained virologic response SVR12 rates were: genotype 1, 99.4% (707/711); genotype 2, 99.4% (670/674); genotype 3, 80.0% (16/20). DAA-naïve patients (p = 0.008) with HCV genotype except 3 (genotype 1 vs. 3, p = 2.68 × 10 -5 ; genotype 2 vs. 3, p = 3.28 × 10 -5 ) had significantly higher SVR12 rates. No significant difference was observed between CKD stage 1-3 (99.1% [1209/1220]) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4-5 (98.9% [188/190]) patients, or between cirrhotic (99.0% [398/402]) and non-cirrhotic (99.1% [999/1008]) patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that genotype 3 [OR 33.404, 95% CI (7.512-148.550), p value (p = 4.06 × 10 -5 )] and past experience of IFN-free DAAs [OR 3.977, 95% CI (1.153-13.725), p value (p = 0.029)] were both significantly independent predictors of non-SVR12. AEs were reported in 28.2% of patients, and 1.6% discontinued treatment owing to drug-related AEs. AEs were significantly higher in CKD stage 4-5 (41.6% [79/190]) than CKD stage 1-3 (26.1% [319/1220]) patients (p = 2.00 × 10 -5 ). AEs were also significantly higher in cirrhotic (38.6% [155/402]) than in non-cirrhotic (24.1% [243/1008]) (p = 2.91 × 10 -18 ) patients., Conclusions: G/P regimen is highly effective and safe to treat CHC patients even with refractory factors such as CKD and advanced liver fibrosis. However, patients with past experience of IFN-free DAA treatment and genotype 3, CKD stage 4 or 5, and advanced liver fibrosis should be more closely observed.

Based on high efficacy and safety demonstrated in clinical trials, treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks is recommended for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who are direct-acting antiviral (DAA) naïve, genotype 1 or 2, and noncirrhotic. The aim of this study was to validate real-world experience with 8-week G/P treatment in Japan. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in 554 patients who underwent 8-week treatment from among 1,022 patients who initiated G/P therapy. The majority (54.5%) were male, with a median age of 66 years, and HCV genotype distribution was genotype 1, 43.8%; genotype 2, 55.3%; and mixed subtype, 0.9%. Overall, the sustained virologic response rate at 12 weeks (SVR12) was 92.8% (530/571) in the intention-to-treat population and 99.3% (526/530) in the per-protocol population. The SVR12 rates by subgroups were as follows: subtype 1a, 100% (6/6); 1b, 100% (189/189); 2a, 99.3% (150/151); 2b, 99.0% (103/104); and mixed subtype, 50% (2/4). Among four patients with virologic failure following 8-week treatment with G/P, none had baseline polymorphisms or treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in NS3. However, 2 of 4 patients with virologic failure had treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in NS5A. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 21.5% of patients and 1.2% of patients discontinued due to drug-related AEs. In conclusion, G/P treatment for 8 weeks was safe and effective for DAA-naïve noncirrhotic genotype 1 or 2 patients in a real-world clinical setting in Japan., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Nowadays, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment is the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C patients. Some DAA regimens are highly effective and safe even for those with renal dysfunction/failure including those receiving HD. However, it remains unclear to what extent HD specialists gain knowledge about advances in anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. To clarify the current situation and identify problems in the treatment of HD patients with chronic hepatitis C, we performed a questionnaire survey at 36 HD facilities between June 2016 and September 2017. In a total of 3418 HD patients, 179 (5.2%) were positive for anti-HCV antibody, and among these patients, 110/125 (88.0%) were positive for serum HCV RNA. Of the latter, only 42/110 (38.2%) patients received antiviral therapy. Moreover, HCV serotyping or genotyping was performed in 23/110 (20.9%) patients. In 26/49 (53.1%) of the remaining 68 untreated patients, "HD specialists do not know any HCV-specific treatments" and "HD specialists have no opportunity to consult with a hepatologist" were the reasons cited for the lack of anti-HCV treatment. This epidemiological study found that some HD patients with chronic hepatitis C had not yet received antiviral treatment despite the emergence of DAAs. To overcome such undesirable circumstances, medical cooperation between HD specialists and hepatologists should be required., (© 2018 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.)

Background/aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy for genotype 1b in chronic hepatitis C patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3., Methods: In a multicenter collaborative retrospective study, 706 patients who have received ledipasvir which is NS5A inhibitor, and sofosbuvir 400 mg which is NS5B nucleoside polymerase inhibitor daily for 12 weeks between September 2015 and January 2017 were subjected to this analysis. Virologic response and adverse events in patients with CKD stage 3 were compared with those in patients with CKD stages 1 and 2., Results: The rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 97.0% in patients with CKD stage 1, 97.1% in patients with CKD stage 2, and 94.7% in patients with CKD stage 3, respectively. There were no significant differences in the SVR rates between CKD stages 1 and 2, and CKD stage 1 and stage 3. The incidence of adverse events over than grade 2 was 0% in patients with CKD stage 1, 0.5% in patients with CKD stage 2, and 3.0% in patients with CKD stage 3, respectively. For treatment and follow-up period, eGFR levels in the patients with CKD stage 3 were not worsened compared to those at baseline., Conclusion: This study suggested that the virologic response of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in patients with CKD stage 3 was not inferior to those with CKD stages 1 and 2. In addition, administration of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir did not affect eGFR levels in the patients with CKD stage 3.

Background: The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ribavirin therapy for elderly patients with genotype 2-infected chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in Japan., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ribavirin based on real-world clinical data., Results: The subjects consisted of 270 patients, 47.0% of whom were aged ≥65 years. The sustained virological response rates in patients aged <65 and ≥65 years were 98.6% and 95.3%, respectively. Hemoglobin levels decreased during treatment due to ribavirin-related hemolysis, and were significantly lower in patients aged ≥65 years than those aged <65 years at all time-points. A reduction in ribavirin dose was necessary in 31.0% (26/84) of patients with hemoglobin levels <13.0g/dL and in 70.7% (39/127) of those aged >65 years. Although the most frequent adverse event was anemia, no patients discontinued the use of either ribavirin or sofosbuvir. The incidence of ribavirin-related anemia in patients aged ≥65 years was 34.6% and significantly higher compared with that in patients aged <65 years (2.8%)., Conclusions: Treatment with sofosbuvir/ribavirin for genotype 2-infected CHC was effective and safe even for elderly patients, although the incidence of adverse events including ribavirin-related anemia was relatively high., (Copyright © 2017 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although several vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms were reported to affect the outcome of pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PR) therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients, there are no reports on the impact of the vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms in PR therapy combined with protease inhibitor (PI). Vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms were determined in 177 genotype 1b-infected chronic hepatitis C patients who received 12 weeks of PR therapy with telaprevir, a first-generation PI, followed by 12 weeks of PR therapy. The sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 83.1% (147 of 177 patients). The frequencies of vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms were: 83 non-TT and 94 TT genotypes for GC, 97 non-AA and 80 AA genotypes for DHCR7, 151 non-AA and 26 AA genotypes for CYP2R1, 162 non-GG and 15 GG genotypes for CYP27B1, and 105 non-GG and 72 GG genotypes for VDR gene. Multivariate analysis extracted IL28B TT genotype (P = 2.05 × 10(-6)) and serum 25(OH) D3 level (P = 0.024) as independent factors contributing to the achieving of SVR. The SVR rate in IL28B TT genotype patients with serum 25(OH) D3 level of < 25 ng/ml was significantly low compared to other patients. None of the vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms affected the treatment outcome and serum 25(OH) D3 level. In conclusions, the IL28B polymorphism and serum 25(OH) D3 level contributed significantly and independently to SVR in PR combined with PI for genotype 1b-infected chronic hepatitis C patients. However, none of vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms had an impact on the treatment outcome and serum 25(OH) D3 level., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: Pegylated-interferon/ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV) therapy with a protease inhibitor is the standard therapy for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C. Despite improving treatment outcomes, patients with thrombocytopenia are often difficult to treat because interferon commonly exacerbates thrombocytopenia. In this study, partial splenic embolization (PSE) was performed in patients with hypersplenism-induced thrombocytopenia to determine the effectiveness of this method as a potential treatment., Methods: Patients were pretreated with PSE and then received triple combination therapy. The safety and efficacy of PSE was evaluated., Results: Eighteen patients were analyzed, including 12 patients with the interleukin 28B (IL28B) major genotype and 12 patients with the inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) major genotype. The median embolization rate with PSE was 70% (range: 40-85%). PSE increased the patients' platelet counts from 71.5×10(3) /μL (53-99×10(3) /μL) to 121.5×10(3) /μL (70-194×10(3) /μL; p=0.0002). The patients' platelet counts fluctuated above 50×10(3) /μL during the treatment. Specifically, the increase in the platelet count was significantly associated with the ITPA major genotype compared with the minor genotype (p=0.0057 at 2 weeks, p=0.0031 at 3 weeks, and p=0.0148 at 4 weeks). Adherence to peg-IFN-α2b was sufficient (1.38 μg/kg/week). The rapid viral response rate was 72.2% (13/18), the end of treatment response rate was 88.9% (16/18), and the sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 66.7% (12/18). The SVR rate for patients with the IL28B major genotype was 83.3% (10/12). No adverse effect due to PSE pretreatment was found in any patients. Furthermore, no patient discontinued treatment due to thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: PSE, in conjunction with triple combination therapy, is a useful and safe method to treat genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients with hypersplenism-induced thrombocytopenia.

Objectives: This study investigated the relationship between hepatitis C virus (HCV) dynamics and sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the efficacy of an extended treatment with telaprevir-based triple therapy among patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b., Methods: Among 220 patients receiving triple therapy for 24 weeks, the SVR rate was analyzed at each time point at which HCV RNA became undetectable. The SVR rates in the patients who did not achieve a rapid virological response (RVR) were compared with those in 27 patients who received triple therapy for 48 weeks., Results: The SVR rates of interleukin 28B (IL28B) TT and non-TT patients were 100 versus 66.7% after 1 week, 97.6 versus 72.2% after 2 weeks, 95.2 versus 84.2% after 3 weeks, 93.1 versus 72.2% after 4 weeks, 76.9% versus 11.1% after 6 weeks, and 88.9 versus 14.3% after 8 weeks, respectively. All of the IL28B TT patients who showed undetectable HCV RNA levels until week 8 achieved an SVR. In contrast, the SVR rates in the IL28B non-TT patients who did not achieve RVR with 24 and 48 weeks of treatment were 11.8 and 62.5%, respectively (P=0.017)., Conclusion: These results suggest that an SVR can frequently be achieved by IL28B TT patients, even with 24 weeks of treatment, when HCV RNA remains undetectable until week 8, and also that IL28B non-TT patients should have RVR values to achieve an SVR with 24 weeks of treatment. The SVR rate was low in IL28B non-TT patients treated for 24 weeks who did not achieve an RVR; however, it could increase when the treatment duration was extended to 48 weeks.

Background: Close relationships between chronic hepatitis C and vitamin D levels have been reported. For genotype 1b infection, the current standard of care is pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy combined with a protease inhibitor. The present study analyzed the relationship between outcomes of triple therapy and serum 25(OH)D3 levels., Methods: Factors contributing to sustained virological response were investigated in 177 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received telaprevir-based triple therapy in this prospective study., Results: The sustained virological response rate was 86.9% in patients with 25(OH)D3 levels of >18 ng/ml; this was higher than the 66.7% in patients with 25(OH)D3 levels of ≤ 18 ng/ml (P=0.003). 25(OH)D3 levels and IL28B genotype were identified as significantly independent factors contributing to sustained virological response. The sustained virological response rate did not differ according to 25(OH)D3 levels in patients with the IL28B major genotype. The sustained virological response rate was 64.9% in patients with the IL28B minor genotype and 25(OH)D3 levels of >18 ng/ml, and was 38.5% in those with decreased 25(OH)D3 levels (P=0.045)., Conclusions: In triple therapy, 25(OH)D3 levels were an independent factor contributing to sustained virological response. Of particular note, the sustained virological response rate was significantly lower in patients with the IL28B minor genotype., (Copyright © 2014 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: The most important factor influencing the effect of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin therapy (PEG) for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b with high viral load is the interleukin 28B (IL28B) genotype. We investigated the usefulness of lead-in twice-daily interferon (IFN)-β/ribavirin therapy (IFN-β), and the early hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) dynamics was compared between PEG and IFN-β groups according to the IL28B genotype., Methods: Forty-six patients were randomly allocated to PEG and IFN-β groups, and HCV-RNA dynamics in an early phase of treatment were analyzed., Results: The patients with minor IL28B genotype was 6/23 and 8/23 in IFN-β and PEG groups, respectively. In the patients with IL28B major genotype, viral load reduction was marginally greater in IFN-β group than in PEG group. In contrast, in the patients with the IL28B minor genotype, viral load reduction was significantly and numerically greater in IFN-β group than in PEG group at 1 week (2.07 vs. 0.76 log IU/mL, P = 0.038), 2 weeks (2.73 vs. 1.01, P = 0.009), 4 weeks (2.72 vs. 1.55, P = 0.059), and 12 weeks (4.56 vs. 3.24, P = 0.104). The sustained virological response rates in the IL28B major genotype were similar between IFN-β group (47.1%, 8/17) and PEG group (53.3%, 8/15). In contrast, the sustained virological response rates in the IL28B minor genotype were numerically higher in IFN-β group (50.0%, 3/6) than in PEG group (12.5%, 1/8), although not statistically significant., Conclusion: It was suggested that lead-in twice-daily IFN-β/ribavirin treatment followed by PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy may modify the HCV-RNA dynamics compared with that by PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy, and it is particularly useful for the IL28B minor genotype., (© 2012 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Background and Aim: Although the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) effect of statins in vitro and clinical efficacy of fluvastatin combined with Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have been reported, the details of clinical presentation are largely unknown. We focused on viral relapse that influences treatment outcome, and performed a post-hoc analysis by using data from a randomized controlled trial., Methods: Thirty-four patients in the fluvastatin group and 33 patients in the non-fluvastatin group who achieved virological response (complete early virological response [cEVR] or late virological response [LVR]) with PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy were subjected to this analysis. Factors contributing to viral relapse were identified by using multiple logistic regression analysis., Results: Relapse rate in patients with cEVR was significantly lower in the fluvastatin group (2 of 23, 8.7%) than in the non-fluvastatin group (9 of 26, 34.6%; P = 0.042). The use of fluvastatin decreased relapse rate in patients with LVR (27.3% vs 57.1%), though not significantly. Overall, relapse rate was significantly lower in the fluvastatin group (14.7%; 5 of 34) than in the non-fluvastatin group (39.4%; 13 of 33; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified absence of fluvastatin (P = 0.027, odds ratio [OR] = 3.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-15.11) and low total ribavirin dose (P = 0.002, OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.38-4.19) as independent factors contributing to relapse., Conclusion: The concomitant addition of fluvastatin significantly suppressed viral relapse, resulting in the improvement of sustained virological response rate, in PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy for CHC patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load., (© 2012 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin combination therapy is the standard-of-care (SOC) treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b and high viral load. The addition of fluvastatin to SOC treatment has been suggested to be effective for better outcome in retrospective pilot analyses. We investigated whether the combination of fluvastatin with PEG-IFN/ribavirin could actually improve sustained viral response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. A randomized, open-labeled, controlled study was conducted between July 2008 and December 2009 in 101 chronic hepatitis C patients allocated to PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy with or without fluvastatin. SVR rates were calculated in groups, stratifying host and viral factors. We also analyzed predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate regression analysis. Rapid and early virological, and end of treatment response rates in the fluvastatin group were not significantly different from those in the non-fluvastatin group. Notwithstanding, SVR rate was significantly higher in the fluvastatin group than in the non-fluvastatin group (63.0%vs 41.7%, P = 0.0422). Comparison of the two groups stratifying demographic data and HCV characteristics showed significantly higher SVR rates to more than 80% in males, more than two mutations in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR), and a history of relapse among the fluvastatin group than the non-fluvastatin group. Being male and major genotype IL28B single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were independent predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate analysis. Fluvastatin-combined with PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy significantly improves SVR rates in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. Male and major genotype IL28B SNPs were independent predictors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin combination therapy., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)