Search

This sub-study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of favipiravir (FPV) within Thai adults and quantitatively assess differences in exposure to those previously reported in other populations as a basis to understand putative differences in efficacy between studies conducted in different regions. It was nested within a prospective trial of adults with symptomatic COVID-19 infection without pneumonia receiving 1800 mg FPV twice-daily on day 1 and 800 mg twice-daily thereafter. Individual PK profiles were fitted with a one-compartment disposition model (first-order absorption). Eight adults (seven female) with a median age of 39 years and BMI of 27.9 kg/m 2 were included. Seven adults achieved plasma concentrations above the EC 90 in vitro target (25 mg/L), with minimum-maximum concentrations decreasing with repeat dosing. The mean FPV apparent clearance observed in this study was 1.1 L/h (coefficient of variation [CV]: 60%), apparent volume of distribution 20.6 L (CV: 40%), absorption rate constant 6.1 h (CV: 100%), and 2.4 daily % change in apparent clearance (CV: 315%). Higher exposures were observed in these Thai adults compared with data from previous studies in Chinese, Japanese, and Turkish populations, respectively. Current FPV doses recommended in Thailand achieved target plasma concentrations with higher exposures than those described previously in other populations. The limited sample size prohibits firm conclusions from being drawn but the presented data warrants confirmation with a view to interrogate the appropriateness of doses used in randomized clinical trials that failed to demonstrate efficacy., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of molnupiravir and favipiravir in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at risk of severe COVID-19., Methods: In an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter trial in Thailand, participants with moderate COVID-19 and at least one factor associated with severe COVID-19 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral molnupiravir or oral favipiravir (standard of care). Phone calls for remote symptom assessment were made on Days 6, 15, and 29. Participants with worsening symptoms were instructed to return to the hospital. The primary endpoint was pulmonary involvement by Day 29, as evidenced by ≥2 of the following: dyspnea, oxygen saturation <92% or imaging., Results: Nine hundred seventy-seven participants (487 molnupiravir, 490 favipiravir) were enrolled from 8 July 2022 to 19 January 2023. 98% had received ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 83% ≥3 doses. By Day 29, pulmonary involvement occurred in 0% (0/483) in molnupiravir arm versus 1% (5/482) in favipiravir arm (-1.0%; Newcombe 95.2% CI: -2.4% to -0.0%; P = 0.021); all-cause death in 0% (0/483) and <1% (1/482); COVID-19 related hospitalization in <1% (1/483) and 1% (3/482); treatment-related adverse event in 1% (5/483) and 1% (4/486); and serious adverse event in 1% (4/483) and 1% (4/486)., Conclusions: Favipiravir and molnupiravir had a similar efficacy and safety profile. Whether either of the two reduced the risk of complications during the omicron era in this population with a low risk of pulmonary involvement and a high vaccine coverage remains unclear. There were no differences in any of the safety endpoints., Thai Clinical Trials Registry Id: TCTR20230111009., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)