Search

Objectives: We aimed to determine whether non-A non-B aortic dissection (AD) differs in morphologic and haemodynamic properties from type B AD., Methods: We simulated and compared haemodynamics of patients with acute type B or acute non-A non-B AD by means of computational fluid dynamics. Wall pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) in both the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) at early, mid- and late systole were evaluated. Morphology, WSS and the FL/TL wall pressure ratio were compared between groups., Results: Nineteen patients (type B, n = 7; non-A non-B, n = 12) were included. The median age (51 [46, 67] vs 53 [50, 63] years; P = 0.71) and a complicated course (14% vs 33%; P = 0.6) did not differ between the type B group and the non-A non-B group. However, the median entry tear width was increased in the non-A non-B group (9.7 [7.3, 12.7] vs 16.3 [11.9, 24.9] mm; P = 0.010). Streamlines showed, in patients with non-A non-B AD, blood from the TL flowed into the FL via the entry tear. Prevalence of a FL/TL wall pressure ratio >1.0 (type B versus non-A non-B) at early, mid- and late systole was 57% vs 83% (P = 0.31), 43% vs 83% (P = 0.13) and 57% vs 75% (P = 0.62), respectively. WSS did not differ between the groups., Conclusions: The increased FL/TL wall pressure ratio observed during systole in non-A non-B AD may beget a complicated presentation., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: The incidence rate of distal stent graft-induced new entry (d-SINE) after frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic dissection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and seek the clinical and anatomical predictive factors., Methods: This study is a retrospective multicentre evaluation of complications including d-SINE, aortic events and reintervention after the frozen elephant trunk procedure for aortic dissection., Results: Our cohort included a total of 177 consecutive patients who underwent the frozen elephant trunk procedure for acute and chronic aortic dissection at 5 centres in Japan from May 2014 to March 2021. The incidence rate of d-SINE was 14.1% (25/177 patients). The cumulative incidence of d-SINE was 7.1%, 12.4% and 21.4% after 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively. d-SINE was not associated with mid-term survival rate. After competing risk regression analysis, onset time >48 h (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-12.79; P = 0.031) was detected as an independent predictor., Conclusions: Awareness that there is a relatively higher incidence of d-SINE after frozen elephant trunk procedures is important. Non-hyper-acute phase was detected as an independent risk factor. Pre-emptive endovascular repair may be appropriate to protect new entry in high-risk patients., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We investigated factors contributing to coagulopathy in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and coagulopathy's influence on patient outcomes., Methods: We grouped 420 patients who underwent ATAAD repair-none under anticoagulation therapy or with liver disease-by the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) at admission:  <  1.2 (no coagulopathy, n  =  371), 1.2-1.49 (mild coagulopathy, n  =  33), or  ≥  1.5 (severe coagulopathy, n  =  16). We then compared the clinical presentation, dissection morphology, and outcomes among the groups. We assessed the PT-INR in relation to the preoperative hemodynamics and searched for factors predictive of a PT-INR  ≥  1.2., Results: The transfusion volume and operation time were increased among patients with coagulopathy (P  <  0.05). The in-hospital mortality (15.2-37.5% vs. 5.1%, P  < 0.001) and 5-year survival (61.1-74.4% vs. 87.6%) were relatively poor for these patients. The median PT-INR was 1.03 (0.97-1.1) for patients with stable hemodynamics (n  =  318), 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for those in shock (blood pressure  <  80 mmHg) not given cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (n  =  81), and 1.1 (1.0-1.54) for those in shock given CPR (n  =  21) (P  < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified shock (P  <  0.001), a partially thrombosed false lumen (P  =  0.006), and mesenteric malperfusion (P  =  0.016) as predictive variables., Conclusions: Shock, a partially thrombosed false lumen, and mesenteric malperfusion appear to be predictive of dissection-related coagulopathy, which influences outcomes negatively., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Objectives: Outcomes of planned and unplanned (rescue) double arterial cannulation (DAC) in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were investigated retrospectively., Methods: The study involved 805 patients who were divided into 4 groups according to the cannulation strategy: single cannulation of the femoral artery (n = 338), axillary artery (n = 256), left ventricular apex (n = 52) or ascending aorta (n = 5) (total, n = 57), and DAC (n = 154). Patients who underwent DAC were divided between planned (n = 132) and rescue (n = 22) usage. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Both unmatched and propensity score-matched analyses were performed., Results: Shock (39%, 19%, 33% and 14%, in the femoral artery, axillary artery, left ventricular apex/ascending aorta and DAC, respectively) and leg malperfusion (5%, 16%, 16% and 26%, respectively) differed significantly (P < 0.001), but in-hospital mortality did not (9%, 8%, 18% and 7%, respectively; P = 0.096). The 5-year survival rates were 79.4%, 79.7%, 78.6% and 82.2%, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis showed no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality rates (10%, 12%, 14% and 9%, respectively; P = 0.78) and 5-year survival rates (78.4%, 72.3%, 82.3% and 78.0%, respectively). The leading vessel combination and indications for planned and rescue DAC were the femoral and axillary arteries (98%) and true lumen narrowing and/or leg malperfusion (34%), and the axillary followed by femoral (77%) artery and low cardiopulmonary bypass flow (36%). In-hospital mortality in the planned and rescue DAC groups was 7% and 9%, respectively., Conclusions: DAC seems effective for both prevention and management of intraoperative malperfusion., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Aortic dissection may induce a systemic inflammatory reaction. The etiological backgrounds for elevation of the white blood cell count remain to be clarified. In 466 patients with acute type A aortic dissection treated surgically within 48 hours of symptom onset, the etiologic background of an elevated admission white blood cell count and the effect of such elevation on outcomes were assessed retrospectively. Patients' white blood cell count differed significantly in relation to the extent of dissection, with a median (25th, 75th percentile) white blood cell count of 10.4 (8.1, 13.9) x 103/μL for dissection confined to the ascending aorta, 10.5 (8.2,13.) 103/μL for dissection extending to the aortic arch/descending aorta, 11.1 (8.2, 13.7) x 103/μL for extension to the abdominal aorta, and 13.3 (9.8, 15.9) x 103/μL for extension to the iliac artery (p<0.001). With 11.0 x 103/μL used as the cut-off value for white blood cell count elevation, multivariable analysis showed current smoking (p<0.001; odds ratio, 2.79), dissection extending to the iliac artery (p = 0.006; odds ratio, 1.79), age (p = 0.007, odds ratio, 0.98), and no coronary ischemia (p = 0.027, odds ratio, 2.22) to be factors related to the elevated white blood cell count. Mean age differed significantly between patients with and without an elevated white blood cell count (62.3 vs. 68.3 years, p <0.001). Although in-hospital mortality was similar (7.5% vs.10.9%, p = 0.19), 5-year survival was lower in patients without an elevated count (85.7% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.019), reflecting their more advanced age. In conclusion, our data suggest that dissection morphology and patient age influence the acute phase systemic inflammatory response associated with an elevated white blood cell count in patients with ATAAD. A better understanding of this relation may help optimize diagnosis and perioperative care., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection with D-dimer elevation have not been clarified., Methods and Results: D-dimer was measured preoperatively within 24 hours of symptom onset in 262 patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The median (and interquartile range) admission D-dimer concentration in our total patient group was 26.7 (8.3-85.9) μg/mL. Median (interquartile range) D-dimer concentrations were 5.0 (2.6-18.0) μg/mL for complete false lumen thrombosis (n=33), 60.9 (19.4-160.4) μg/mL for partial thrombosis (n=81), 26.5 (10.0-70.6) μg/mL for a patent false lumen (n=131), and 8.7 (3.2-26.9) μg/mL for ulcerlike projection (n=17) ( P< 0.01). With a D-dimer concentration of ≤8.3 μg/mL representing the lower quartile, we then investigated predictors of a low D-dimer level. Multivariate analysis showed dissection limited to the ascending aorta ( P< 0.01; odds ratio, 9.81) or descending aorta ( P< 0.01; odds ratio, 7.68), a completely thrombosed false lumen ( P< 0.01; odds ratio, 4.02), and absence of brain ischemia ( P= 0.013; odds ratio, 4.74) to be predictors of the lower D-dimer concentration. Compared with patients with a low D-dimer concentration (≤8.3 μg/mL, n=66), patients with a D-dimer concentration >8.3 μg/mL (n=196) had a reduced preoperative platelet count and increased operation time and transfusion volume. In-hospital mortality was elevated in this group (1.5% versus 11.2%; P= 0.031), although 7-year survival did not differ for hospital survivors (lower versus higher, 93.1% versus 79.1%; P =0.21)., Conclusions: D-dimer concentrations are strongly influenced by the extent of dissection and false lumen status. Operative risks are increased in patients with a relatively high D-dimer concentration., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)